Safe Mode: On
The assertion that Macro Evolution is scientific is pure propaganda.

Ro 1:25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.

Trillions of fossils are present in the fossil record and billions of specimens have been collected, but none lend credence to the Darwiniam paradigm of MACRO evolution, or the idea that all the species evolved from a common ancestor.

The entire fos r More..ecord is segmented into a relatively small group of historical and present species featuring only minor changes by mechanisms of adaptation, or by the mutation and recombination of DNA to produce relatively small and complexity neutral changes in the species.

If Macro evolution were true the entire fossil record would be replete and evenly distributed with micro intermediate forms from the common ancestor to every other species. Billions of fossils would be found reflecting every micro change for every living organism, from the common ancestor to every current form, as Darwin himself had suggested in his time.

To get around this problem, the evolutionists have carefully manufactured a number mythical intermediate forms centered around a number of carefully conceived frauds mainly from fossil fragments in order to fill the fossil record with the missing links by figments of their imagination. A single skull of unknown origin migh be used to create a whole new species of animal in this way, for example.

These are then presented to the general public not by archeological fossil evidence but by crafty sketches, artist renderings, plastic models and skeletons, and computer generated virtual images and animations that we see in our museums, textbooks, and on the discovery channel every day.

Archeoptrix, or the best example typically presented by evolutionists to support their theory, has long been accepted to be 100% bird by the majority of paleontologists, and has long been discredited as evidence of the missing links supporting macro evolution; not to mention that billions of such examples should be found.

Financial support is provided by special interest groups to all institutions involved in the evolution paradigm under the mandate of either finding or producing and manufacturing evidence to promote and support the Darwinian myth.

Such findings are then deceitfully presented as conforming to some proven scientific method when nothing could be further from the truth. The conclusions presented by the science of geology, archeology, paleontology, genetics, and physics supporting the MACRO evolutionary propaganda hoax are all equally preposterous.

Our ability to manufacture evidence supporting macro evolution is limited only by the "credulity" of our audience, one evolution evidence fabricator admits.

Richard Dawkins relies exclusively on the credulity of his audience when he draws their attention to artist renderings, plastic models, and sketches as irrefutable proof in support of his religious beliefs in evolution.

This monumental fool goes on about the wonders of life in the evolutionary process and how dreadful and short sighted it is to forgo such an illusion in favor of religion.

Is it not infinately more wonderful to have a personal relationship with the creator of all life who no only sacrificed himself so that you might live but who is also the sovereign and omnipotent Lord who will judge and condemn you for all eternity should you reject his plans for your salvation?

Blessed be God, even the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of mercies, and the God of all comfort;

Amen

******
A FEW QUOTES AND COMMENTS BY EVOLUTIONISTS TO CONSIDER.......

"Contrary to what most scientist write, the fossil record does not support the Darwinian theory of evolution, because it is this theory (there are several) which we use to interpret the fossil record. By doing so, we are guilty of circular reasoning if we then say the fossil record supports this theory."-evolutionist Ronald R. West, "Paleontology and Uniformitarianism," in Compass, May 1968, p.216.

Niles Eldredge, head of the Paleontology Department at the American Museum of Natural History, in Chicago, made this comment:

"And this poses something of a problem. If we date the rocks by their fossils, how can we then turn around and talk about patterns of evolutionary change through time in the fossil record?"-Niles Eldredge, Time Frames: The Rethinking of Darwinian Evolution, 1985, p.52.

The curator of zoological collections at Oxford University wrote this:

"A circular argument arises: Interpret the fossil record in the terms of a particular theory of evolution, inspect the interpretation, and note that it confirms the theory. Well, it would, wouldn't it?" - evolutionist Tom Kemp, "A Fresh Look at the Fossil Record," New Scientist 108, December 5, 1985, p.66.

"Are the authorities maintaining, on the one had, that evolution is documented by geology and on the other hand, that geology is documented by evolution? Isn't this a circular argument?" - evolutionist Larry Azar, "Biologists, Help!" BioScience, November 1978, p.714.

What anti-evolutionist have known for over a century, the actual evolutionist scientists are admitting. However, you lay-evolutionists - the whole front of your bodies are CoolAid stained. It's not just on your lip. You guys really haven't thought this out. You have so embraced evolutionism, that you do not realize your analytical arguments to PROVE evolution rely upon the PRESUMPTION that it already has been proven. The proof of evolution is the proof of evolution is the proof of evolution without every having established the proof of evolution.

"...intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic change, and this is perhaps the most obvious and serious objection which can be urged against the theory [of evolution]." -Charles Darwin, Origin of Species, quoted in evolutionist David Raup, "Conflict Between Darwin and Paleontology," in Field Museum Bulletin.

We have a very complete fossil record. 200 million specimens of 250,000 plus species. So where is the gradualism?

"It is not even possible to make a caricature [hazy sketch] of an evolution out of paleobiological facts. The fossil material is now so complete that . . the lack of transitional series cannot be explained as due to the scarcity of the material. The deficiencies are real; they will never be filled." - evolutionist N.Heribert-Nilsson, Synthetische Arbildung (The Synthetic Origin of Species)

Loading the player ...
Embed CodeSwitch Player
Plays: 5200 (Embed: 0)

Added: Mar-25-2010 Occurred On: Mar-25-2010
By: Humility
In:
Other
Tags: evolution, creation, abiogenesis, science, punctuated equilibrium, jesus, christ, christianity, satan, radiometric,
Views: 6953 | Comments: 17 | Votes: 2 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE