Safe Mode: On
Did Romney strap Obama to the roof of his car?

Here's an open debate - Romney or Obama. Capitalism or Socialism?

 
Poll
Who won the debate
The poll already expired - voting is no longer possible!
Results:
Obama
(15) 21.43%
Romney
(46) 65.71%
Lehrer
(9) 12.86%
 
Total Votes 70
Expiration Date 10/11/2012

Added: Oct-4-2012 Occurred On: Oct-4-2012
By: RomeoTango1
In: Other
Tags: Obama, Romney, Debate
Location: Hell, Michigan, United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 1662 | Comments: 64 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.

  • Romney. Total domination even when Lehrer tried to call him on something once and gave Obama more time a couple times.

    Even the liberal media hacks saw it. Anybody who thinks Obama somehow won that debate should have his his head examined.

    Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
    john1054 (5081.84)  

    (8)

  • "President Obama had better hope that a kicked ass is covered under ObamaCare"
    ~Dennis Miller,after the debate

    Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
    Fire37Rescue (12159.10)  

    (7)

  • Romney owned Obama during the entire debate and after it was over, sold Obama as scrap waste.

    Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
    Fire37Rescue (12159.10)  

    (6)

    • @Fire37Rescue

      He wiped that dog eating grin off Obama's face.

      Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
      e4bannan (27879.54)  

      (8)

    • @e4bannan
      about damn time someone did.Time for Obama to go on the View,Ellen and MSNBC to lick his wounds. I doubt Hollywood can clean up this hot mess of a performance.

      Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
      Fire37Rescue (12159.10)  

      (8)

    • @Fire37Rescue

      I tell ya, it was a tough night for the big O. Got F'd in the A twice. First in front of tens of millions on tv then again by Mooch at home on their anniversary.

      Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
      e4bannan (27879.54)  

      (6)

    • @Fire37Rescue

      The President finally found somebody willing to disagree with him to his face and the fantasy of "supertalker" was gone in an instant.

      Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
      john1054 (5081.84)  

      (8)

    • @john1054 Talking shit and spewing false information has been brought to you by the Party that took away Fairness Doctrine. If talking back at someone and disagreeing with them is how you think debates are won you are more delusional then you think, better go eat some of that "clean" coal of yours.

      Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
      someone2 (140.52)

      (-4)

  • it doesn't matter who wins the debate......we the voter, citizen and public will always loose, you muppets keep listening to the men behind the curtain telling you what you should be worrying about then take a look at how much of your federal income tax goes to the middle east.........just a giant bullshit storm full of lies and confusion and evasion of the real problem; a war we can never win that will destroy our economy if we let it......just ask the Russians.

    Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
    fern420 (3230.88)  

    (4)

    • @fern420

      And your solution is what, 420?

      Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
      GraveMatter- (1001.02)

      (2)

    • @fern420

      You are wrong it DID already destroy your economy, together with that 'self destroying way of life' (fatness related medicare is causing more financial troubles in the US than any of the wars you fight at the moment)

      The solution of just printing some extra money will stop soon enough also. So yes, America, sorry I mean the US will have some major problems ahead.

      Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
      litebyte (152.70)  

      (0)

    • @GraveMatter-


      get the fuck out of the middle east and keep our noses in our own business and stop trying to help people that do not want our help. D

      more people murdered each day on the streets of Detroit than Afghanistan.......yet no one seems to give a shit....just sayin....we could fix that shit in a week if we stopped spending 6 billion dollars a day on a lost cause and a people who hate our fuking gutz.....we should fix our own fuked up country before we go giving away tax payer dollars More..

      Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
      fern420 (3230.88)  

      (0)

  • Maher : Obama's not looking like he came for a job interview, Romney so far does

    Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
    EMAG-K (518.12)

    (4)

  • Here's my conservative standpoint: Mitt would be Obama-lite. We'll still be going down the same road, but just a tad slower.

    Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
    joe prole (1632.30)  

    (4)

    • @joe prole

      I think the basic difference is, Under Obama as oppression continues, he will push to restrict firearms (which he had to shelve because of Fast & Furious) and Romney won't. Romney seems satisfied with the increased Fed spending from 20% to 26% of GDP under Obama. Romney seems satisfied with the level of taxation, but supposedly wants less redistribution via tax deductions and credits. But I don't think Romney holds a principled difference on the intrusion of gov't into personal More..

      Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
      Yukon6400 (963.32)

      (2)

    • @Yukon6400

      One thing I admire is that Romney actually sat down for an interview with Chris Cox of the NRA-ILA, something Obama would NEVER do. Chris grilled him about the 2nd and Romney is convincingly pro 2nd A for the right reasons. I read about the gun legislature that Mitt passed in Mass. and he simply 'held to his guns' but in a bi-partisan spirit compromised with lefties for some gun control items written into the bill. So where lefties are saying Mitt will implement gun control, they a More..

      Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
      MERCILESS (696.66)  

      (1)

  • Even on Yahoo, a site that reeks of Liberalism, the top story this morning had the following statement - "Even on the most basic political points, Jeff Greenfield says, Obama seemed clueless."

    That about summed the whole debate up.

    Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
    safetychuck2 (4081.12)  

    (4)

  • Capitalism or Socialism? People on this site are fucking morons.

    Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
    100 Leaves (152.60)  

    (3)

  • Both candidates did pretty well. It was a fairly boring woknfest... but at least we got a little more specificity from Romney.

    The notion that Romney somehow won the debate by virtue of the fact that he didn't shit himself on stage is a bit much.

    Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
    EventHorizon2012 (1854.08)  
    EventHorizon2012
    View Channel
    Send Message

    (3)

    • @EventHorizon2012 you have your third party candidate now..he`s back to the center again..the right winger of the primaries is all but gone.
      as gore vidal made it clear,the potus is a figurehead,the u.s is run from corporate boardrooms,this theater plays to the citizenry like penny novels to 19th century plebes.

      Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
      stixtoo (120.80)

      (3)

    • @EventHorizon2012

      A perfect conclusion Dude. Romney did make a much fresher appearance to me, looked like Obama had some very tired days behind him (well, with all the shit in the middle east it's also no wonder...)

      In someway Romney reminded me of the guy who is selling those 'unbelievable low' mortgages at the bank and Obama the one who is tired of it of warning to not step in it.

      Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
      litebyte (152.70)  

      (1)

    • @EventHorizon2012

      Thumbed you up EH regardless of your condescending remarks about Romney. Looked to me like Obama DID shit himself. Was the FIRST time in over 4 years the dude was challenged on HIS bullsheite! Was refreshing to me and very sorely needed.

      Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
      boomersooner (2092.84)  

      (3)

    • @boomersooner

      Thanks boomer, thumbed you up too... but the condescension wasn't really aimed at Romney.... more at those who think that it was some colossal debate win because he finally managed to put together some sentences without saying something awkward.

      Kind of like saying I won a gunfight because I managed not to shoot myself.

      In all fairness, I think Romney had a few times where he made good points that Obama had no response to, and I would probably have to give him the edge in this More..

      Posted Oct-5-2012 By 
      EventHorizon2012 (1854.08)  
      EventHorizon2012
      View Channel
      Send Message

      (0)

  • Socialism will never work. It is not programmed into human nature. We are a selfish species that only seeks for our own well-being. Most animals are the same nature. To think that government is above human nature is asinine.

    Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
    dbm4891 (47.50)  

    (3)

    • @dbm4891

      That is the dumbest thing I've ever read. LOL. dbm4891 pretending to be some sort of geologist and applying his bullshit theory to government.

      Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
      vbenv (17.60)  

      (0)

  • Comment of user 'DirtyUncleBerty' has been deleted by author!
    • Comment of user 'LSDforuandme' has been deleted by author!

    • @DirtyUncleBerty i see the gothic fantasy continues.

      Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
      stixtoo (120.80)

      (0)

    • Comment of user 'DirtyUncleBerty' has been deleted by author!

    • @DirtyUncleBerty oh im not against it..it might even give it a balanced moral center.

      Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
      stixtoo (120.80)

      (0)

    • Comment of user 'DirtyUncleBerty' has been deleted by author!

  • I'm not sure Romney strapped him to the roof of the car, I think that he shoved Obama up the muffler!

    Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
    Stamp (222.40)  

    (1)

  • Saw this posted online this morning

    I missed the last part if the debate. Did Obama put Honey Boo Boo on his shoulders and dance to "Livin' On A Prayer"?

    Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
    DamnProudAmerican (134.30)
    DamnProudAmerican
    View Channel
    Send Message

    (1)

  • Comment of user 'ALakbar' has been deleted by moderator!

  • Romney had no specifics, just tons of fluff. He is selling Bush 2.0 and he is a good salesman but if you listened to the words and the thought that went into them, Obama made better and more thoughtful points. But yeah, Romney talked over Obama a few times, seemed more energetic and basically dominated the moderator so he won in the "presence" department but lost in the "idea" department.

    More military spending, more tax breaks for the megarich all at the cost of educati More..

    Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
    nkdmansam (252.38)

    (1)

    • @nkdmansam yeah but as far pulling in independent voters Mitt Romney won round 1

      Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
      BloodyStars (43.30)  

      (0)

    • @BloodyStars

      sadly true. There were so many opportunities for Obama to pounce on or zing Romney. Off the top of my head, when Romney said "your money is where your heart is", Obama should've countered with "so why are you running for President of the US and not Switzerland?"

      When Romney talked about subsidies for green energy, Obama should've owned it. It makes sense that new energy technology would require govt. subsidization whereas there is no argument for why major oi More..

      Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
      nkdmansam (252.38)

      (0)

    • @nkdmansam Wasn't himself, in all honesty he looked like he was thinking about something else. But I think no matter what he would have lost this round the economy was bound to be a losing topic but he definitely could have done some damage control. I think he missed his opportunity when Mitt started talking about how much good private insurances do, when all evidence points to how greedy they become.

      Posted Oct-4-2012 By 
      BloodyStars (43.30)  

      (0)