Sukhoi Fighter Jet- NAF Rebels Point Out Kiev False Flag At MH-17 Crash Site Which Fits Australian News Release Scenario- (Eng Subs)

This is the first time the entire OSCE arrival at the MH-17 crash site has been seen in it's entirety and with subtitling (for English speaking audiences) which shows that the separatist rebels in Donbass fully believed that the downing of MH-17 was a provocation (false flag attack) conducted by the Kiev regime, who, incidentally, had conducted numerous false flags on civilians in Odessa, Mariupol and Lugansk previously.. This possibility is backed up by the fact that Rupert Murdochs Australian News outlet recently released a full 17 minute transcript that reveals a Sukhoi fighter jet and parachutists were witnessed on multiple occasions the day MH-17 was shot down. Link here to the Australian News release (western MSM source) full transcript that reveals there was a 2nd plane - a fighter jet, and parachutists that were seen crawling:

www.news.com.au/national/full-transcript-russian-backed-rebe

Below are the cut out portions from the official Australian News released transcript from the 17 minute video they did not release. For reasons unexplained, Australian News chose to only release a 4 minute portion of the 17 minute video but also release the full transcript for the full 17 minute video which they withheld. Their error here may be due to being encapsulated in their own media bubble and their belief in their own fabrications. In other words, they may have gotten sloppy by releasing the full transcript which matches the rebels dialogue with the OSCE upon their arrival at the crash site.




Transcript:




Cmdd: They say the Sukhoi (Fighter) brought down the civilian plane and ours brought down the fighter.


Background: But where is the Sukhoi?


Where is the Sukhoi then?


Background: It’s confusing. No idea where the Sukhoi is, it’s burning here and there and debris everywhere.


They saw a pilot crawling at Rassipnaya. A pilot was seen crawling.


Cmdr: The other plane that fell down, they are after them, the pilots.


Background: The second one?


Cmdr: Yes, there’s 2 planes taken down. We need the second.


Background: The second one is a civilian too?


Background: The fighter jet brought down this one, and our people brought down the fighter.


Background: They decided to do it this way, to look like we have brought down the plane.


Yes Kalyian. I understood you, but we’re already at the crash site. A passenger plane was brought down. They brought down the passenger plane and we brought down the fighter.


We’re at the crash site.


On the other side of the field.


Cmdr: The parachute jumpers are there.


Background: But there are two planes, from my understanding.


Background: And what’s the other one? A Sukoi?


Cmdr: A Sukhoi.


The Sukhoi brought down the plane and we brought down the Sukhoi.


Is it far from here? Where did it fall?


Looks like … Where’s the smoke coming from?


Somewhere else it is burning, the 49 village.


I mean … the two pilots landed on parachutes.


Cmdr: Five parachutes jumped off this plane. Five people jumped off this plane on the bird site. How to get there?


OK we’ll go there soon. We’ll see. OK then.






It is recommend to save screen shots of these pages before Australian News realizes their mistake and they are taken down.




The fighter jet scenario also fits the information that the Russian Civil Aviation Authorities released on July 21, 2014, four days after MH-17 was shot down. The professional and technologically impressive radar presentation revealed that Russian civil aviation radar picked up the fighter jet along with numerous other civilian aircraft that accurately match the data related to the aircraft corridor. Link to the official Russian Civil Aviation Ministry radar presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSpeo5RcQQo All civilian planes are accurately represented as proven by looking at Flight Tracker data on the day of the tragedy. There is no possibility that the Russian radar presentation is manipulated in any way, shape or form due to other aircraft matching the correct flight paths and timeframes. The Russian radar also picked up the Air India Flight that was directly behind MH-17, thereby authenticating it's accuracy.




The Air India flight 25 km for MH-17 reveals additional information. The DSB preliminary report makes no mention of the conversation that was picked up by Air India pilots which according to the Time of India stated the following:

timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Air-India-flight-was-90-se
Minutes before the crash caused by a missile strike, the AI pilots had also heard the controller give the Malaysian aircraft MH17 what is called "a direct routing". This permits an aircraft to fly straight, instead of tracking the regular route which is generally a zig-zag track that goes from one ground-based navigation aid or way point to another. "Direct routing saves fuel and time and is preferred by pilots. In this case, it proved fatal," said an airline source. "The AI Dreamliner was less than 25km away from the Malaysian aircraft when the latter was hit by a missile. When the pilots learnt the cause of the crash later, they were stunned. It's like the person standing next to you has been hit by a sniper bullet," said the source.




(The words of the Air India pilots are sadly ironic, considering the Kiev regime had already conducted a false flag attack using snipers in the Hotel Ukraine who were filmed by a BBC camera crew as they were shot at from the Maidan supporter HQ.




Verifiable Proof The BBC Covered Up The Truth Of The Madian Sniper Investigation - BBC Reporter Shot At On Camera

Read more at www.liveleak.com/view?i=91e_1430237505#rAuZUsL2ZXG5yGLb.99


The official DSB preliminary report states that the MH-17 flight path was not adjusted even though MH-17 pilots requested a course change and an altitude increase. This is a significant contradiction. The DSB report also makes no mention of the Air India Flight or the conversation with Dnirpo Control flight tower.




Adversely, western governments led by the US and the Kiev Ministry that falsely accuse Russia of involvement in the downing of MH-17 have never released any professional government information (radar, satellite, FDR's, tower recordings and transcripts, AWAC and ship based radar data) related to the MH-17 tragedy. Instead they have falsely accused the separatists of various crimes and abuse of the deceased passengers and their belongings. They are using a blogger (Elliot Higgins) and a reporter from RTL, who stated he found a few rusty pieces of explosive fragmentation 7 months after the crash, to prove their case. A very strong example of intentional western deception is revealed in the link below in full by both German and Australian mainstream media sources. To put it simply, Western powers intentionally lied about the behavior of rebels at the MH-17 crash site. Video linked here of Special Envoy to the Prime Minister Of Australia (Angus Houston) stating on record that the rebels were professional and incredibly helpful.




German And Australian Investigative Reports Confirm US And UK Media Lied About Separatist Forces At MH-17 Crash Site

Read more at www.liveleak.com/view?i=ac3_1437194648#6XBPRT749eys0YIx.99

The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) also recorded eyewitness statements at the time of the MH-17 disaster. The eyewitnesses, which, incidentally, have not been interviewed by the Dutch Safety Board (a first, as no eyewitnesses have been) clearly state and corroborate that there was a fighter jet in close proximity to MH-17 when it was shot down on July 17, 2014 and that it flew off in the direction of Rostov. The BBC tried to delete these video interviews after they had already been posted online. However, diligent citizen activists were quick to cache the official BBC videos. Link to BBC eyewitness statements corroborating fighter jet scenario: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgCuewzapnc Note that the BBC also did not investigate their own sniper attack in the Live Leak link above related to the snipers in the Hotel Ukraine.
BBC eyewitness statements: Eyewitness #1: … And there was another aircraft, a military one, beside it. Everybody saw it.

Eyewitness #2: Yes, yes. It was flying under it, because it could be seen. It was proceeding underneath, below the civilian one.

Eyewitness #3: There were sounds of an explosion. But they were in the sky. They came from the sky. Then this plane made a sharp turn-around like this. It changed its trajectory and headed in that direction [indicating the direction with her hands].

One more point to take into consideration is that the Kiev regime has stated on numerous occasions that they had no fighter jets in the air on the day MH-17 was shot down, although they had flown numerous sorties previously on over 50 consecutive days prior to the shoot down. Therefore, it seems highly unlikely that they would not fly on that particular day. A British government witness who provided information to The Daily Mail UK is on record as stating that the Kiev air force were flying that day and that MH-17 did request a course change due to the pilots being 'uncomfortable'. The DSB report does not match the British government (RUSI) Whitehall witnesses statements. Link here: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2696975/Putin-blames-Ukrain

More on the RUSI witness here, he had previously worked with Elliot Higgins on spreading 'information' (randomly chosen shell casing videos) on the Syrian False Flag chemical weapons attack of August 2013:

MH-17 Mystery- Dr. Igor Sutyagin - Mi5/Russian Double Agent Who Gave Out Misleading Information On MH-17Read more at www.liveleak.com/view?i=9af_1432256107&;amp;amp;comments=1#16ze80SC72BMB0rs.99

All the information above fits the scenario of a massive global western media and government coverup and points in the direction of the Kiev Ministry as the intentional murderers of the victims on flight MH-17 via a false flag attack that was used to blame the Donbass rebels and indirectly place blame on Russia in order to implement a sanctions regime that would cripple the Russian economy and give the US the proxy war that it needs to maintain global hegemony. Link to video explaining this scenario in detail.

Why does the U.S. need a big war in Europe?

www.liveleak.com/view?i=976_1426892031#jXzeKieTdaCCERZR.99