Multiculturalism’s Failure in Europe

Multiculturalism’s failure in Europe

by Hanne Nabintu Herland

"In Malmö foreigners are moving back to their countries of origin like Iraq or Iran, because things are much better in those countries than in Sweden."

Over the past decade the opponents of multiculturalism have multiplied. Leading
politicians such as Angela Merkel, David Cameron and Nicolas Sarkozy have all
condemned this Leftist strategy of integration that equates the ideals of other
cultures with European traditional values. The idea is that Europeans should
not uphold their own cultural roots, but instead listen humbly to new immigrant
residents and accept their traditional norms and customs in the name of

But multiculturalism has in essence turned out quite differently than the utopian
dreamers of the naïve Leftwing socialists hoped for when they first started
out. Today many decline to engage in necessary discussion concerning the need
to uphold traditional European values in a time of upheaval, for fear of
offending non-Western immigrants and being labeled intolerant and racist.

This implies a tragic misunderstanding of what tolerance really means.

To be tolerant means to respect other cultures when visiting their countries, just
as immigrants from foreign cultures are to respect European values and ways of
life when they move to Europe. To be tolerant is to respect the traditions,
values and social norms of the country in which you are staying.

One of the main problems with multiculturalism is that it does not respect the
differences and boundaries between nations and cultures. For instance, for a
number of years there have been demands to tone down the Christmas celebration
and exclude it from school arrangements, justified by Leftist claims that the
holiday’s emphasis on the birth of Jesus Christ and the celebration of Santa
Claus will offend non-Western immigrants. Yet many Muslims object to these
types of multicultural attempts, as they say that they of course have nothing
against celebrating the birth of Jesus, or in Arabic “Isa”. After all, he is a
prophet in Islam.

Similarly, in Norway there are efforts to criticize the traditional use of the Norwegian
flag on Independence Day, the 17th of May, to avoid conflicts with non-Western newcomers.
Hardcore multiculturalists want each person to use the flag of his country of
origin, rather than the Norwegian flag, which symbolizes national unity.

When pride in one’s own traditional values is continuously suppressed and spurned,
the result may be that Europeans feel discriminated against in their own
culture. This becomes a “racism against whites” which in turn creates a growing
environment of displeasure with “non-Western foreigners”. In turn, resentment
fuelled among ethnic groups may grow malicious. The Swedish city of Malmö is an
excellent example of how bad things can get when a sloppy careless
multiculturalism is implemented and society doesn’t demand respect for Swedish
law. In Malmö foreigners are moving back to their countries of origin like Iraq
or Iran, because things are much better in those countries than in Sweden.

The mistake of multiculturalism and its contempt for traditional European values is
that it fails to recognize the need for a strong common ground of cultural

Yet there are many misconceptions about what it means to be against
multiculturalism. Some believe that it involves a general antagonism towards
immigration; that the goal is a society with no foreigners whatsoever, a kind
of monoculture where only the original ethnic population is desired. This is,
however, not the case.

To oppose multiculturalism means to respect the sovereignty of other countries and
their right to define the cultural ideals they wish to emphasize within their
boundaries, and at the same time, to claim this very right in Europe within the
context of European culture. Europeans should define the values and laws that
apply in Europe and immigrants from other cultures should respect these. Just
as Europeans should not dictate norms in other countries and have no right to
intervene in other countries’ internal affairs, non-Westerners should not have
rights to define fundamental values in Europe.

For instance, to respect the right of other cultures to practice polygamy in their
own countries does not necessarily mean that you must accept the same cultural
practice when in Europe. Here European values and marriage laws apply. Those
who are not inclined to conform to European laws are of course free to return
to their countries of origin and practice their religious, marital or cultural
preferences there.

We who are against the injustice of multiculturalism aspire to a globalized world
with a greater degree of international respect based on each country’s right to
determine its own values. The plea is for a Europe where foreigners and all
Europeans receive equal treatment and actively participate in the development
of a society based on the values of the traditional European heritage.

Opponents of multiculturalism have a positive view towards law-abiding working
immigrants, who are welcome, but criminals with no constructive contribution to
make to society should be punished and expelled from communities. If you show
no respect for the country you move to, you lose the right to stay there.

We want a multi-ethnic society that evaluates individuals on an equal basis in
light of their competencies and willingness to work rather than ethnicity. But
multiculturalism is heavily tinted with an underlying socialistic racism which
implies that people with dark skins who do not originate in Europe should be
“pitied”. These people must be helped, provided with welfare benefits and
excused if they commit crimes. This socialistic racism is denigrating, and
today permeates governments and social structures in a number of European
countries, amongst them Norway. Instead of showing immigrants respect by
offering them work, we shuffle the non-Western into an underclass of
welfare-dependent victims. The tragedy of multiculturalism is that it has
created a class-oriented and ethnically segregated environment which places
so-called “non-Western foreigners” at the bottom of the social ladder.

Multiculturalism has slowly robbed ordinary Europeans of pride in their own culture and
awareness of the importance of its values. It was the European cultural
environment that years ago fostered citizens of the Enlightenment with a high
regard for honesty, punctuality, duty, integrity and solidarity. Emphasis on
moral elements such as self-discipline, education, humility and good manners
formed the basis for a society that respected individual differences.
Capitalism joined with the Protestant ethic produced a culture that emphasized
hard work, savings, honesty and the belief that earnings should not merely be
spent, but re-invested. When Europeans relinquish these cultural ideals, the
upshot is today’s moral decline, with financial crises, mediocrity and cultural

Europeans must reinforce a belief in these norms, ideas and guidelines that form the
basis of traditional Western thinking. We must continue to build on common
historical values to which everyone, regardless of ethnic origin, should
respect when living in Europe. This will produce a stronger, more peaceful and
stable Europe for the times ahead.



By: kauan (298.50)

Tags: Sweden Norway Scandinavia Sverige Stockholm Norja Oslo Multiculturalism Political Correctness Socialism Marxism Communism Western World Immigration Integration Diversity Cultures

Location: Norway

Your account has no permission to add replies to this thread!
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report.

Liveleak on Facebook