Safe Mode: On
9-11 Was An Inside Job - John Kerry admits WTC7 building was brought down by controlled demolition

9-11 Was An Inside Job - John Kerry admits WTC7 building was brought down by controlled demolition



Added: Sep-29-2013 Occurred On: Sep-29-2013
By: Vegas Street Prophet
In:
Conspiracy
Tags: 9-11, John Kerry, WTC7 building, controlled demolition
Location: New York, New York, United States (load item map)
Views: 5419 | Comments: 198 | Votes: 4 | Favorites: 3 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • 911 was an outside job.

    Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

    (6) | Report

    • @ChicagoGun 
      Ha! That's what they want you to believe to throw you off from the REAL truth that it was actually an outside-in job.

      Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

    • Comment of user 'morganson281' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • Comment of user 'Mud Duck' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @Mud Duck LOL. READ THE REPORT! http://www.nist.gov/manuscript-publication-search.cfm?pub_id=861610 & discover.
      1:WTC7 came down in 3 phases the 2nd phase stated 1.75sec after phase 1 & was at FREE-FALL.PG46
      2:Though the physical evidence was promptly destroyed 'recycled' NIST states that the collapse initiated in a single column, No '79'due to office fires.
      3:By computer simulation column 79's failure created an asymmetric internal collapse leading to an symmetrical external collaps More..

      Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

      (-1) | Report

    • Comment of user 'Mud Duck' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @Mud Duck does doing source research to you?

      Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

      (-1) | Report

    • Comment of user 'lolrus' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @lolrus actually the official NIST report, not just something I read on the inter-net. Try to read it and comprehend it, perhaps even with a rational critical minds eye, I doubt you could. http://www.nist.gov/manuscript-publication-search.cfm?pub_id=861610

      Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

      (-1) | Report

  • "Controlled Fashion" is referring to the fire department clearing everybody out, pulling all support back from the building in a "controlled fashion", as opposed to scrambling when the collapse became immanent. Get a life truther, even the figureheads of your movement have bailed already.

    Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

    (5) | Report

  • Comment of user 'the wedge' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • These tin foil hatters are no doubt the biggest stoners as well. Fucking paranoid douche bag clowns. lmfao.

    Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

    (4) | Report

    • Comment of user 'nomadlife' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @Stage-Right DC would have never been able to pass the laws it did, and launch the wars it did if it weren't for 9/11. But yeah, it's all paranoia. Those filthy tinfoil hatters have nothing better to do than make shit up for no apparent reason!

      Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @Stage-Right LOL. READ THE REPORT! http://www.nist.gov/manuscript-publication-search.cfm?pub_id=861610 & discover.
      1:WTC7 came down in 3 phases the 2nd phase stated 1.75sec after phase 1 & was at FREE-FALL.PG46
      2:Though the physical evidence was promptly destroyed 'recycled' NIST states that the collapse initiated in a single column, No '79'due to office fires.
      3:By computer simulation column 79's failure created an asymmetric internal collapse leading to an symmetrical external coll More..

      Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

      (-1) | Report

    • @nomadlife  hahahahah nice one ;)

      Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

      (1) | Report

    • @nomadlife.....are you sure? maybe its just a conspiracy....and they just want you to think that. or maybe not...are they conspiring against you? NOW WHAT? who the fuck are they? Maybe LiveLeak is conspiring against you to control your mind.........im sure you`ll get to bottom of it though.  

      Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

  • ........somebody's tin foil hat is on waaay too tight.........this is totally un-adulterated BULLSHIT.........as if John Kerry has any credibility at all.......what a joke he is.............

    Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

    (3) | Report

    • Comment of user 'King Jeremy Von Vedder' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @King Jeremy Von Vedder  .....wtf are you talking about?......

      Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

      (-2) | Report

    • Comment of user 'King Jeremy Von Vedder' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @King Jeremy Von Vedder LOL. READ THE REPORT! http://www.nist.gov/manuscript-publication-search.cfm?pub_id=861610 & discover.
      1:WTC7 came down in 3 phases the 2nd phase stated 1.75sec after phase 1 & was at FREE-FALL.PG46
      2:Though the physical evidence was promptly destroyed 'recycled' NIST states that the collapse initiated in a single column, No '79'due to office fires.
      3:By computer simulation column 79's failure created an asymmetric internal collapse leading to an symmetrical ex More..

      Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @PaulRicketts sometimes when you use too many layers of tin foil, shit goes haywire. To prove my point, put some in the microwave.

      Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

  • Armchair engineers at it again!

    Fires could never bring down a building like wtc7 like that. Just accept it and move on please.

    Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

    (3) | Report

  • Comment of user 'King Jeremy Von Vedder' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @King Jeremy Von Vedder  they all were pre planned... Termite in the rubbble

      Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @recon721 
      Termites? That's a new one, didn't know they eat steel, aluminum, and concrete.

      Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

      (-1) | Report

    • Comment of user 'King Jeremy Von Vedder' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • Comment of user 'King Jeremy Von Vedder' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @King Jeremy Von Vedder LOL. READ THE REPORT! http://www.nist.gov/manuscript-publication-search.cfm?pub_id=861610 & discover.
      1:WTC7 came down in 3 phases the 2nd phase stated 1.75sec after phase 1 & was at FREE-FALL.PG46
      2:Though the physical evidence was promptly destroyed 'recycled' NIST states that the collapse initiated in a single column, No '79'due to office fires.
      3:By computer simulation column 79's failure created an asymmetric internal collapse leading to an symmetrical ex More..

      Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

  • LOL, all he did was say that if anyone has any credible facts, he'd be happy to look at it. Wow!!! More evidence that truthers are just searching for any shred of ostensible evidence and exploit it to the n'th degree.

    LOL LOL LOL

    Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

    (3) | Report

    • @jrusso7660 LOL. READ THE REPORT! http://www.nist.gov/manuscript-publication-search.cfm?pub_id=861610 & discover.
      1:WTC7 came down in 3 phases the 2nd phase stated 1.75sec after phase 1 & was at FREE-FALL.PG46
      2:Though the physical evidence was promptly destroyed 'recycled' NIST states that the collapse initiated in a single column, No '79'due to office fires.
      3:By computer simulation column 79's failure created an asymmetric internal collapse leading to an symmetrical external colla More..

      Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

      (-1) | Report

    • @rozza2012 

      Dude, I can't read that. The glare from your tin foil hat is blinding me.

      Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @jrusso7660 studied in stupidity to the point you cannot even read the official government report.

      Posted Sep-30-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

  • You can't ADMIT what you do not know. Thanks for the misleading title OP

    Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

    (2) | Report

  • yup...just like that silver star he won on the Mekong river...lol

    Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

    (2) | Report

  • How do his comments, in any way, substantiate that 9/11 was "an inside job?"

    Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

    (2) | Report

  • Comment of user 'Rusty-Bumper' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @Rusty-Bumper LOL. READ THE REPORT! http://www.nist.gov/manuscript-publication-search.cfm?pub_id=861610 & discover.
      1:WTC7 came down in 3 phases the 2nd phase stated 1.75sec after phase 1 & was at FREE-FALL.PG46
      2:Though the physical evidence was promptly destroyed 'recycled' NIST states that the collapse initiated in a single column, No '79'due to office fires.
      3:By computer simulation column 79's failure created an asymmetric internal collapse leading to an symmetrical external col More..

      Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

    • Comment of user 'Rusty-Bumper' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @Rusty-Bumper that is the correct answer.

      Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

  • LMFAO!!!!!! I've never believed a damn thing that's come out of this moron's mouth. Do you really think I'd believe anything about what he as to say about 9/11? Get lost poster.

    Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

    (2) | Report

    • Comment of user 'nomadlife' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @nomadlife 
      So you're saying you've found an endless supply of tin foil?

      Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

    • Comment of user 'nomadlife' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @gonehuntin LOL. READ THE REPORT! http://www.nist.gov/manuscript-publication-search.cfm?pub_id=861610 & discover.
      1:WTC7 came down in 3 phases the 2nd phase stated 1.75sec after phase 1 & was at FREE-FALL.PG46
      2:Though the physical evidence was promptly destroyed 'recycled' NIST states that the collapse initiated in a single column, No '79'due to office fires.
      3:By computer simulation column 79's failure created an asymmetric internal collapse leading to an symmetrical external colla More..

      Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @rozza2012 
      I suggest you watch this and then sleep on it a bit.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kSq663m0G8

      Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

  • He's damaged goods, to be sure, but anybody who bought the governments story line is just a fucking retard.

    Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

    (2) | Report

  • John can't remember if his wife took her medication much less be part of a conspiracy where secrecy is a must.

    Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

    (2) | Report

  • I know it's difficult for most Americans but read bin ladens interview about how he wasn't involved http://www.globalresearch.ca/interview-with-osama-bin-laden-denies-his-involvement-in-9-11/24697 and ask yourself if it sounds truthful. If you have an ounce of decency in you I'm sure you will realise you have been lied to. Why would bin laden deny his involvement? This should be his biggest moment yet he denies it! Wake up you fucking morons.

    Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

    (2) | Report

    • @bazeret2 LOL. & READ THE REPORT! http://www.nist.gov/manuscript-publication-search.cfm?pub_id=861610 & discover.
      1:WTC7 came down in 3 phases the 2nd phase stated 1.75sec after phase 1 & was at FREE-FALL.PG46
      2:Though the physical evidence was promptly destroyed 'recycled' NIST states that the collapse initiated in a single column, No '79'due to office fires.
      3:By computer simulation column 79's failure created an asymmetric internal collapse leading to an symmetrical external c More..

      Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @rozza2012 NIST has been compromised, fuck them

      Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @rozza2012 Still waiting on you to answer these questions:


      1.Only an average freefall was measured for 8 stories out of 47 so what is this small period of freefall suppose to mean? (which may I remind you is 1.75 seconds after collapse initiation)

      2.Please clarify this statement you made:

      I asked: So NIST stating freefall 1.75 seconds AFTER the start of the decent of the north wall means what?

      Your reply:It means the structure went from supporting at least 100% of it's weight, it More..

      Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @barogers619 1:Incorrect Pg46 of NIST's report the chart shows 3 distinct phases they then average out the 3 phases in an obvious contradiction & conflation of their own data. 2: Yes free-fall requires the material falling to be offering no resistance to gravity, in WTC7's case that means the buildings own structure. 3:Exactly, it is supporting none of it's own structure, however once again NIST's attempt to conflate data. Their datum & most commonly viewed wall of WTC7's collapse, the More..

      Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @rozza2012 Im still confused as to why you refer to NIST like its the truth?

      1. You didnt answer my question, what does this period of freefall suppose to mean? Is freefall the moment explosives are set off and create the no resistance factor?

      2. You didnt clarify the statement but danced around it with techno babble. If the collapse has already begun then how is still supporting 100% of its weight all the way up to 1.75 seconds?

      4. There was no symmetry in the falling building! Are yo More..

      Posted Dec-4-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

  • It's amusing to read how people debate who was behind the events that day. Meanwhile illegal wars ..., draconian laws passed, freedoms once enjoyed are gone, economy is fucked and isn't going to improve anytime soon. Sometimes it's worth to look at the big picture.

    Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

    (2) | Report

  • so,

    John Kerry is believable now?

    ha, ha, ha!

    Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

    (2) | Report

  • I used to respect this guy after I saw Winter Warrior.
    Sad how he's sold out and become a tool of that which he once opposed.
    Fuckin "Lurch" indeed.


    :/

    Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

    (1) | Report

  • Comment of user 'weshard' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @weshard The questioner specifically asked him about wtc7 what makes you think Kerry is talking about wtc6? That's dumb!

      Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

    • Comment of user 'weshard' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • Kerry is a well-known slobbering oaf who has L and R drawn on the bottom of his shoes to assist him when dressing in the morning. It is of no surprise that a bunch of mentally-ill conspiracy kooks would latch on to a moronic statement like this, especially considering Kerry has been uttering a steady stream of idiotic nonsense for at least the last 30 years.

    Go ahead, feed your little fantasies if it makes you feel better.

    Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

    (1) | Report

  • Comment of user 'garyrob' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • Chemical compounds in the dust that were made up of thermite? Oh you mean metal oxide and paint? Those compounds are usually found in steal structured buildings.

    Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

    (1) | Report

    • Comment of user 'ShouldaListenedToRonPaul' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • Comment of user 'themanpanda' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @ShouldaListenedToRonPaul 

      Redundancy, magma is molten by default. Secondly, molten metal is not magma.

      Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

    • Comment of user 'ShouldaListenedToRonPaul' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • Comment of user 'nomadlife' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • First: I have NO IDEA if there was a conspiracy or not.

    That being said, if it is true that the chemical signature for thermite was found in the WTC dust, it must be explained. Nobody has explained that yet have they? I honestly don't know, so I'm asking. That kinda sounds like direct evidence to me of SOMETHING, tin foil hats or not, assuming it is true.

    Could it be that contractors unknowingly painted nanothermite on inside the WTC while renovations were done? Supposedly, nanothermite ca More..

    Posted Sep-29-2013 By 

    (1) | Report