New York Times and Amateur Sleuth Site ACW Caught Fabricating Lies About Ukrainian Buk Missile Systems in MH17 Shootdown Zone

The Ukrainian Buk video attached has been ignored by the Dutch Safety Board. They have instead decided to use pop up amateur sleuth sites to 'investigate' the shootdown of MH17 which killed 298 people on July 17, 2014. The New York Times has recently put out a story citing the amateur sleuth site "Arms Control Wonk" which blames Russia for faking satellite evidence of Ukraine's Buk missile systems in the shootdown zone. The video above proves beyond any doubt that the Kiev coup imposed government and military had numerous Buk missile systems in the Slavyansk area at the time MH-17 was shot down, thus, making the entire NYT/ ACW concocted 'report' irrelevant and show it to be a poorly reported propaganda attempt due to omission of evidence. Simply put, the western media establishment and their hastily assembled amateur sleuth sites intentionally choose to ignore all the video evidence showing Ukraine's Buk missile systems in numerous locations throughout the war zone at the time of the shootdown of MH17. These sites only publish 'evidence' that fits the narrative they put forth and intentionally ignore evidence which doesn't fit into that manufactured narrative.

Link to You Tube video of multiple Ukrainian Buks near Slavyansk, Ukraine published on July 19, 2014.

2nd video of 3 Ukrainian Buk systems on the highway in the first few weeks of the civil war in Ukraine.

Please download and save these videos to your hard drive as other videos of these Ukrainian Buks have been removed from You Tube. Proof of video removals here:;amp;comments=1

Note that Bellingcat, ACW and the Dutch Safety Board has never bothered to geolocate or 'investigate' these Buks in the video above or in the attached below Associated Press link and photo. The AP link shows a Ukrainian Buk missile system being towed by Slavyansk and specifically states Ukrainian government forces maneuver antiaircraft missile launchers Buk as they are transported north-west from Slavyansk, eastern Ukraine Friday, July 4, 2014. (AP Photo/Dmitry Lovetsky )
PrintEmail The Associated Press
on July 04, 2014 at 7:42 PM
Additionally, the Ukrainian military personally uploaded video of one of their own Buk systems with active radar array in use in the warzone which can be seen at the 42 second mark in the following Ukrainian Armed Forces video. Please download and save the aforementioned video to your hard drive also. This video of a Ukrainian Buk in action has also been ignored by Bellingcat and the Dutch Safety Board. The questions remain "why are they continuing to ignore video and photographic evidence that shows the Ukrainian regime had numerous Buk missile systems in the shootdown zone?" "And why did Ukraine have an active radar array for a Buk system when the rebels had no aircraft?"
Link to NY Times report:;amp;action=click&contentCollection=timestopics&region=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacem&_r=0
Link to pop up amateur sleuth site ACW 'report' -

Robert Parry of Consortium News has reported on numerous occasions that a CIA source had informed him in the days after the shootdown of MH17, that U.S. intelligence officials had spotted Buk systems in the area but they appeared to be under Ukrainian government control. The source who had been briefed by U.S. intelligence analysts said the likely missile battery that launched the fateful missile was manned by troops dressed in what looked like Ukrainian uniforms.At that point, the source said CIA analysts were still not ruling out the possibility that the troops might have been eastern Ukrainian rebels in similar uniforms but the initial assessment was that the troops were Ukrainian soldiers. There also was the suggestion that the soldiers were undisciplined and possibly drunk, since the imagery showed what looked like beer bottles scattered around the site, the source said. [See’s “”]

Subsequently, the source said, these analysts reviewed other intelligence data, including recorded phone intercepts, and concluded that the shoot-down was carried out by a rogue element of the Ukrainian government, working with a rabidly anti-Russian oligarch, but that senior Ukrainian leaders, such as President Petro Poroshenko and Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk, were not implicated. However, I have not been able to determine if this assessment was a dissident opinion or a consensus within U.S. intelligence circles.

It should be noted also that numerous Dutch media outlets have reported that the Ukrainian authorities did not submit any radar data for the date MH17 was shot down (July 17,2014) even though they had not reported that the information was missing previously. The DSB appears to have gone ahead with the release of their preliminary animated video report in October 2015 without any raw radar imagery or data from the 3 Ukrainian radar facilities that were obviously in operation, due to the permitting of international flights traversing the country, and of course, a war going on with Ukrainian military aircraft in operation throughout the battlefield.

Links to Dutch media reports on Ukrainian authorities stating all 3 radar systems were non operational at the time of the shootdown.
Experts MH17: Strange that radars were not operational

Piet van Genderen, Radar Expert University of Technology and Riemens, CEO of Air Traffic Control the Netherlands (LVNL) during the hearing on the policy response to the research about the MH17. © Reuters. It is strange that three radar systems in Ukraine were disabled for maintenance during the disaster of flight MH17 said radar expert Piet van Genderen at TU Delft on Friday in the lower house, where among other things the report by the Dutch Safety Board on disaster of flight MH17 is being discussed.
A minimum of four radar systems should have images of MH17 disaster

By Michael van der Galien January 22, 2016

Professor and radar expert Piet van Genderen, TU Delft, says that at least four radars should have picked up the images of flight MH17 being downed.

That is a remarkable statement because it proves the government has no radar images and also has not been able to get their hands on them.

During a hearing in the House, Van Genderen literally said the following:

"The primary radar images of these four facilities are the most important because the chances are that they picked up the image of the BUK missile and it should be seen. Also, the disintegration of the aircraft is on these images, it should almost certainly be noticeable."
our radars were active for MH17 '
by Paul Eldering and Jolanda van der Graaf
The shootdown of down MH17 was imaged by at least four radars in the vicinity said Professor and radar expert Piet van Genderen at TU Delft during a hearing in the Parliament. "The primary radar images of these four facilities are the most important because the chances are that the they picked up a BUK missile and it should be seen. Also, the disintegration of the aircraft is on these images, it should be almost certainly noticeable. "

It involves three Ukrainian systems - one in the Lugansk airport and two long-range radar in the vicinity - and a fourth Russian radar at Rostov.
"That all these facilities were all not in operation or under maintenance as Ukraine and Russia claim is not credible," said the professor.

Like Van Genderen, satellite expert Marco Langbroek believes that the images are crucial to the criminal investigation as to who the perpetrators are. According to Langbroek there must exist a large number of satellite images of the disaster. This includes the so-called Space Based Infrared Systems, the top-secret radar systems of the Americans. "Three of these satellites covered Ukraine at the time of the crash," said Langbroek. "It seems to me that justice has every interest to have this information. Indeed, the evidence can thus be substantiated."

Link to all 3 Dutch news stories at one site:

Note that the mainstream US media apparatus has ignored these important Dutch news stories on MH17. Even Google appears to have failed to provide these links back in December 2015 when they were released.

The real questions should be "why is evidence being ignored by the Dutch Safety Board, western powers and the establishment media?" "And why are they relying on amateur sleuth sites to supply cherry picked 'evidence' rather than taking responsibility themselves through certified credible government organizations that will accept proper responsibility for any evidence put forth?"


By: californiastars (572.10)

Tags: MH17, New York Times, Amateur sleuth sites, propaganda, Ukraine

Location: New York, United States