Safe Mode: On
WTC7 -- This is an Orange

So do you believe what your are told or what you can actually see?
Question is, how could a 47 story steel frame modern high rise with concrete slap floors as observed by multiple video recording from the day came down symmetrically and in near free fall speed?
Symmetrically fall mean it largely kept it's square rectangular shape and profile coming down. This is significant because it means that all the load bearing connections on the 21 vertical columns would have to give way at the same time on every floor all the way down and be unaffected by the additional strengthened floors on 21-14-5 that were mechanical plant floors. Had this not happened or had the building due to fires or damage only to the south side as claimed the building would have been out of structural balance and tipped to the side like when a tree is felled and comes comes down
Free fall is significant because for a


Added: Jul-27-2013 
By: nomadlife
In:
Conspiracy
Tags: WTC7, 911, truth, NYC, conspiracy,
Views: 2734 | Comments: 58 | Votes: 12 | Favorites: 2 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Ill be the first to say... Controlled demolition for sure, by who? Idk... Ill just say the building owners so the Feds don't come running for me. :) (hope the Feds didnt own it)

    Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

    (6) | Report

    • @WW3Powers

      The Feds know where you live.....lock your door,.....

      Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @fingers66 lol the only people listening are the Feds!

      Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

    • Comment of user 'corsarii' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • Comment of user 'nomadlife' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @nomadlife thanks for the lesson, notice how I said "building owners" the guy who owned it supposidly doubled his insurance policy before 911 and had added a condition on seperate attacks on multiple buildings. I think he got $20 bill per tower, at least the main ones.

      Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

      (1) | Report

  • Thanks! Good video, voted.

    Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

    (5) | Report

  • Comment of user 'TheFireTiger' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @TheFireTiger
      Have you ever considered becoming a preacher in a church for simple folk who will believe anything? I think you'd have the required talents .

      Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

    • Comment of user 'TheFireTiger' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @TheFireTiger Yeah we obviously don't have the truth. Clear as day. And we are okay with it or we'd all make like Egypt and flood the streets till the truth was revealed. But instead we talk shit on LiveLeak and make no real attempt to find the truth. Baa.

      Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

  • its absolutely a controlled demolition. im not claiming who did it, why, how etc, but when you see the building fall so uniformly, its controlled. its impossible for a building with fire damage to fall like that.

    Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

    (3) | Report

    • @choongification Some of the greatest building fires took place AFTER it too. The ones in china,spain,and gulf states were EPICally on fire. They did not fall.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eINSQ3YQ65I

      Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

      (3) | Report

  • I just hope i will still be alive and see when the truth behind 9/11 attacks is exposed to public. I'm not sure there was any state-level conspiracy behind this but i don't believe we know the real truth either.

    Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

    (3) | Report

  • Comment of user 'nomadlife' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • The ultimate goal was reached by the invasions of Afghanistan & Iraq, funny that most of the alleged hijackers & Bin Laden where from Saudi Arabia, what action did America take with them? nothing they even flew a private jet around the USA when all other aircraft were grounded so to pick up the rest of the Bin Laden family and fly them safely out of the country, then still do trillions of dollars worth of oil business with the Saudis over the following years, seems like the 9/11 master p More..

    Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

    (3) | Report

    • @Mickeyscouse

      Hard to see any investigation being done 12 years later. They've done we'll to conceal/burn everything. File it next to Vietnam, JFK, Panama, etc (then burn it again just in case)

      Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

      (-1) | Report

  • We believe what we see but the words in this video are also "told". It's called independent thinking. Perhaps this video is also attempting to "told" you. I think so. I've never had a skyscraper fall next to my house but I'm sure I couldn't pass a home inspection afterwards.

    Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

    (2) | Report

  • The buildings in the vid for controlled demolition were no where near 47 stories. Who is to say what their construction was? Anyway, I believe, like most, that fire and damaged caused structural failures beyond the limits these buildings were capable of withstanding. In this video WT7 is dropping in pretty much one piece downward, which says to me that the lower floors, enough supports failed. Why do people believe that steel and concrete are the toughest materials known to man???? If there is a More..

    Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

    (2) | Report

  • Hi guys i just wanted to say that at first I always thought that 9/11 was a terrorist plot and never believed that it was an inside job. However over the years I have just seen more and more information surface on the fact that it was an inside job. There seems to be more info flying about that it was an inside job than what the government provided proving it was a terrorist plot. There are many documentary's on youtube which are interesting to watch and show a lot of proof whereas the governmen More..

    Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

    (2) | Report

  • AMERICA LAND OF THE SHEEP

    Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

    (2) | Report

  • If anyone is interested in some actual science, not politically biased, just google "how did fire cause wtc collapse" while the top link refers mainly to WTC 1 and 2, the same science applies to wtc 7. To say theres no other way a building can fall straight down other than controlled demolition is closed minded and ignores scientific principals like gravity. Looking at film of the outside of a building does not give you any insight as to whats happening inside.

    Also, I find it ha More..

    Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

    (2) | Report

    • Comment of user 'nomadlife' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @nomadlife. I dont have to believe anything, twit. Nor do I ask you to believe anything. If you had read my post you would have read my own words. But since the first sentence mentioned science, you stopped there and believed I was quoting someone, much the way you continue to quote the conspiracy dogma. At least try not to contradict yourself while you're failing, sir

      Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

    • Comment of user 'nomadlife' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • Comment of user 'nomadlife' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @nomadlife the center of these buildings in 95% air. Air resists falling objects less than the outer walls, which are where the most robust support columns are. Not all buildings are built this way. The WTC was built as lightweight as possible but still the towers weighed half a million tons. While weight isnt equal to mass, its obvious that buildings have a lot of mass. Without a force strong enough to change an object's inertia, it will tend to fall toward the direction of gravity's pull. More..

      Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

  • 1:09 "By 5:20 PM most of the fires had been extinguished."

    Uh, no. The fireman "pulled", -ie removed all personnel from the building - because the fire was out of control.

    In less than 4 minutes, WTC7 collpase explained: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kSq663m0G8

    Stop looking at the orange and seeing boogiemen that don't exist.

    Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

    (2) | Report

  • Nevermind what happend. What you SHOULD seriously be worried about is why there has not been a real investigation as to why the three buildings collapsed. Engineers have said that it could not possibly have been due to fire. Office fires simply can't weaken steel enough for it to break. But obviously it did. So why the fuck did it?! Will it happen to more buildings in New York City? What if some slob leaves his oven on by mistake and there's a fire in the building. Will it too collapse? Who desi More..

    Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

    (1) | Report

    • Comment of user 'the wedge' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @Zota
      A two storey building near me burned down. A massive steel girder across the middle had softened and bent due to the heat. This was with fire fighters putting it out. Do I believe office fires can weaken steel enough for it to fail? Fuck yeah - I've seen it.

      Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

  • ... Doublethink is the act of ordinary people simultaneously accepting two mutually contradictory beliefs as correct, often in distinct social contexts.[1] Doublethink is related to, but differs from, hypocrisy and neutrality. Also somewhat related yet almost the opposite; is cognitive dissonance, where contradictory beliefs cause conflict in one's mind. Doublethink is notable due to a lack of cognitive dissonance, —thus the person is completely unaware of any conflict or contradiction.

    The More..

    Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

    (1) | Report

  • Yeah totally a demolition & you got to laugh at the BBC powers of prediction 15 minutes before it was taken down ! Also home to a lot of the alphabet secret agencies & i'm sure i've read that the missing billions that Rumsfeld declared a day earlier had all the paperwork in there too! Think the flight that hit a field was heading for that building possibly, bit of a cluster fuck by the architects of 9/11

    Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

    (1) | Report

  • Comment of user 'sprodge' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • land off the free LOL .....80% are just Dumb 2 and fat

    Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

    (1) | Report

  • Comment of user 'wanderer' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • because denial.

    Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

    (1) | Report

  • Comment of user 'nomadlife' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • i love the excuse "well it burned for hours" thats why it collapsed. and the fire just so happened to be near the main support beam...what r the odds on that. b25 bomber hit the empire state building and it burned for hours no collapse. countless other buildings caught fire and videos were even posted on LL where the building didnt collapse and it burned for hours. the fact is WTC7 is the only building in history to actually collapse the way it did just by a fire. no it was not fr More..

    Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

    (1) | Report

    • @OnlyLiarsBlock The Empire State Building was the first and successfully controlled high rise fire, the fire was extinguished in 40 minutes.

      So using your logic since countless other buildings have burned and didnt collapse then none should burn and collapse!?!?!? Thats illogical and demonstratively false. Take this link for example it states:

      •Concrete:7
      •Structural steel:6
      •Brick/masonry:5
      •Unknown:2
      •Wood:2
      Three of these events for steel occurred on 9/11.

      http://www.h More..

      Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @barogers619

      if you read my comment you will see i said no it was not freefall speed but it was pretty damn close.

      as for your source you provided it states more than half the building listed were less than 8 stories:

      Almost 60% of the cases occurred in the 4-8 story building height range, with the
      remainder affecting much taller buildings. Six collapses occurred in buildings over 20
      stories, with three of these occurring at the World Trace Center complex (WTC 1,WTC 2
      and WTC 7 More..

      Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @OnlyLiarsBlock You said NEAR freefall "speed" and I asked what speed in MPH is NEAR freefall "speed", a numerical value will suffice. Is this NEAR freefall "speed" measurement an average speed, initial speed, or final speed?


      I love how you look at the differences in these collapses and yet ignore the blinding factors in the collapse of the WTC buildings. How many of these "buildings that have never collapsed" been hit by a 767or hit by falling debris More..

      Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

    • Comment of user 'nomadlife' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • Comment of user 'nomadlife' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • easy to pick out all the gubment statist comments they love to call names defending their criminal masters who could never do harm to anyone...always entertaining! "people hate the truth, luckily the truth doesn't care"

    Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

    (1) | Report

    • Comment of user 'nomadlife' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • Comment of user 'nomadlife' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • its noticeable anything put up that makes the front pages and goes against the grain is immediately attacked in the comments wonder how many agents of the state are merely gangstalking to cull the herd

      Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

      (-1) | Report

    • Comment of user 'nomadlife' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GhCKpVwcaQ

    i rest my case.

    Posted Jul-28-2013 By 

    (1) | Report

  • Here we go again, another retarded "Truther" video.

    Fuck you truther cunts.

    Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

    (1) | Report

    • Comment of user 'nomadlife' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @nomadlife

      Here we go again, another retarded "Truther" video.

      Fuck you truther cunts.

      ALL of it was intelligent.

      Posted Jul-27-2013 By 

      (0) | Report

    • Comment of user 'nomadlife' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!