http://www.liveleak.com/browse?q=1930 Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:58:55 -0400 Liveleak http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/ll2/logo.gif http://www.liveleak.com/browse?q=1930 Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:12:20 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=753_1371676350 euronymus Dr. Robert H. Goddard, American Rocketry Pioneer. Dr. Robert Hutchings Goddard is considered the father of modern rocket propulsion. A physicist of great insight, Goddard also had a unique genius for invention. It is in memory of this brilliant scientist that NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., was established on May 1, 1959. By 1926, Goddard had constructed and successfully tested the first rocket using liquid fuel. Indeed, the flight of Goddard's rocket on March 16, 1926, at Auburn, Mass., was as significant to history as that of the Wright brothers at Kitty Hawk. Primitive in their day as the achievement of the Wrights, Goddard's rockets made little impression on government officials. Only through modest subsidies from the Smithsonian Institution and the Daniel Guggenheim Foundation, as well as the leaves of absence granted him by the Worcester Polytechnic Institute of Clark University, was Goddard able to sustain his lifetime of devoted research and testing. Goddard first obtained public notice in 1907 in a cloud of smoke from a powder rocket fired in the basement of the Worcester Polytechnic Institute physics building. School officials took an immediate interest in the work of student Goddard. The school's administration, to their credit, did not expel him. He thus began his lifetime of dedicated work. In 1914, Goddard received two U.S. patents. One was for a rocket using liquid fuel. The other was for a two- or three-stage rocket using solid fuel. At his own expense, he began to make systematic studies about propulsion provided by various types of gunpowder. His classic document was a study he wrote in 1916 requesting funds from the Smithsonian Institution so that he could continue his research. This was later published along with his subsequent research and Navy work in a Smithsonian Miscellaneous Publication No. 2540 (January 1920). It was entitled "A Method of Reaching Extreme Altitudes." In this treatise, Goddard detailed his search for methods of raising weather-recording instruments higher than sounding balloons. In this search, he developed the mathematical theories of rocket propulsion. Toward the end of his 1920 report, Goddard outlined the possibility of a rocket reaching the moon and exploding a load of flash powder there to mark its arrival. The bulk of his scientific report to the Smithsonian was a dry explanation of how he used the $5,000 grant in his research. The press picked up Goddard's scientific proposal about a rocket flight to the moon, however, and created a journalistic controversy concerning the feasibility of such a thing. The resulting ridicule created in Goddard firm convictions about the nature of the press corps, which he held for the rest of his life. Goddard's greatest engineering contributions were made during his work in the 1920s and 1930s. He received a total of $10,000 from the Smithsonian by 1927, and through the personal efforts of Charles A. Lindbergh, he subsequently received financial support from the Daniel and Florence Guggenheim Foundation. Progress on all of his work, titled "Liquid Propellant Rocket Development," was published by the Smithsonian in 1936. Goddard's work largely anticipated in technical detail the later German V-2 missiles, including gyroscopic control, steering by means of vanes in the jet stream of the rocket motor, gimbal-steering, power-driven fuel pumps and other devices. His rocket flight in 1929 carried the first scientific payload, a barometer, and a camera. Goddard developed and demonstrated the basic idea of the "bazooka" two days before the Armistice in 1918 at the Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland. His launching platform was a music rack. In World War II, Goddard again offered his services and was assigned by the U.S. Navy to the development of practical jet assisted takeoff and liquid propellant rocket motors capable of variable thrust. In both areas, he was successful. Robert H. Goddard died on Aug. 10, 1945, four days after the first atomic bomb was dropped on Japan. Goddard was the first scientist who not only realized the potentialities of missiles and space flight but also contributed directly in bringing them to practical realization. Goddard had a rare talent in both creative science and practical engineering. The dedicated labors of this modest man went largely unrecognized in the United States until the dawn of what is now called the "space age." High honors and wide acclaim, belated but richly deserved, now come to the name of Robert H. Goddard. On Sept. 16, 1959, the 86th Congress authorized the issuance of a gold medal in the honor of professor Robert H. Goddard. Dr. Goddard's Major Contributions: -Explored the practicality of using rocket propulsion to reach high altitudes, even the moon (1912) -Proved that a rocket will work in a vacuum, that it needs no air to push against -Developed and fired a liquid fuel rocket (March 16, 1926, Auburn, Mass.) -Shot a scientific payload in a rocket flight (1929, Auburn, Mass.) -Used vanes in the rocket motor blast for guidance (1932, New Mexico) -Developed gyro control apparatus for rocket flight (1932, New Mexico) -Received U.S. patent for of multi-stage rocket (1914) -Developed pumps suitable for rocket fuels -Launched a rocket with a motor pivoted on gimbals under the influence of a gyro mechanism (1937) "It is difficult to say what is impossible, for the dream of yesterday is the hope of today and the reality of tomorrow." - Dr. Robert Hutchings Goddard Experiments made between 1926 to 1930: Experiments made between 1930 to 1931: Experiments made between 1934 to 1935: Experiments made between 1935 to 1936: Experiments made between 1936 to 1938: Experiments made between 1941 to 1945: Hope you liked it. Sources: http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/about/history/dr_goddard.html http://www-istp.gsfc.nasa.gov/stargaze/Sgoddard.htm http://siarchives.si.edu/history/exhibits/stories/robert-h-goddard-american-rocket-pioneer http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=753_1371676350 euronymus Robert Hutchings Goddard and Footage of Rocket Experiments Robert, goddard, rocket, pioneer, american, usa, experiments, footage, nasa, propulsion Tue, 18 Jun 2013 09:59:12 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=5e0_1371562471 euronymus English narration, 1930. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=5e0_1371562471 euronymus Film about Russia in 30s Russia, inside, film, 1930, 30s Sun, 16 Jun 2013 10:11:59 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=52e_1371391402 CuntSeeShitDude 1930's footage http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=52e_1371391402 CuntSeeShitDude Old School Parcours &amp; Stunts Awesome, 1930's, Old School, Parcours, Free Running, Stunts Thu, 13 Jun 2013 21:34:48 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d2b_1371172553 thecleaner001 Doctor Purves demonstrates his remarkable invention in spherical locomotion.... a 1930's invention which will'.. one day revolutionise modern transport'. the Dynasphere a one wheel four seater - safe for all the family... a Pathe Special http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d2b_1371172553 thecleaner001 The Dynasphere the Dynasphere,new road transport,1930's,totally safe - honest,four seater available, Sat, 15 Jun 2013 17:06:30 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=81f_1371330063 Detroit Iron Posted by Edward Cline at 8:22 PM Review: American Betrayal : The Secret Assault on Our Nation's Character , by Diana West Where to begin? In American Betrayal *, Diana West begins in 1933. In the name of establishing historical causo-connections, I would have begun in 1781, when Prussian philosopher Immanuel Kant published his Critique of Pure Reason , a brain-cracking treatise which relied on reality to prove that reality was unknowable. That is, by reading his book, a real thing in your real hands, you were expected to agree with Kant that real things were only rough reflections of things whose "essences" existed beyond the evidence of our benighted, warping senses, in some other realm. Kant counted on everyone not noticing the contradiction and not seeing the ease with which his elaborately constructed mare's nest could be exploded. No contemporary, I gather, ever confronted Kant and said, "Herr Professor! If what you say is true, then this book is just a shadow, and the print in it, and all your words, too! What could they mean? How could they be true? Are your words noumena , or mere phenomena ?" But no one ever did confront Kant with his contradictions, fallacies, and cerebral legerdemain, except some Hegelian hair-splitters, and the Western world has been the worse for it. 1781 . Just as the American Revolution, a product of the Enlightenment, was winding to a close with the surrender of Lord Cornwallis at Yorktown, with reality-loyal Americans winning their freedom from the British monarchy, Kant published his Critique , whose ideas, if not opposed and refuted, were guaranteed to destroy the freedom of their heirs. The Founders, as they later debated in Philadelphia the means and ends of a true republican government that would guarantee men's freedom from each other, were not aware of the incubus that was birthing across the Atlantic and which would eventually infect American political philosophy with the syphilis of collectivism, moral relativism, and statism in the 19thcentury. Kant was an enemy of the Enlightenment. Diana West, among her other arguments, contends that the political and intellectual leaders of the West by 1933 had abandoned reason and all Enlightenment ideas. Nay, with very few exceptions, they became as hostile to them as Kant ever was. West begins in 1933. Of what significance is that year? Adolph Hitler became Chancellor of Germany and Reichsstatthalter of Prussia on January 30th, 1933. From August 1934, he would be F"uhrer of Germany until his suicide in April 1945. Democrat Franklin D. Roosevelt became the 32nd president of the United States on March 4th, 1933. He would remain in that office until his death in April 1945. On November 20, 1933, at Roosevelt's urging, the U.S. recognized the Soviet Union. West writes: The West's decision to recognize the USSR - and its determination to keep recognizing it, no matter how much lying and acquiescence to betrayal that entailed - did more to transform us than any single act before or since. The profound diplomatic shift - part Faustian bargain, part moral lobotomy - didn't just invite the Soviet Union into the community of nations. To make room for the monster-r'egime, the United States had to surrender the terra firma of objective morality and reality-based judgment. No wonder, then, that tens of thousands of Dreyfus cases in Russia meant nothing to the "conscience of the civilized world.... Because the Communist r'egime was so openly and ideologically dedicated to our destruction, the act of recognition defied reason and the demands of self-preservation. Recognition and all that came with it, including alliance, would soon become the enemy of reason and self-preservation.... ...It was here that we abandoned the lodestars of good and evil, the clarity of black and white. Closing our eyes, we dove head first into a weltering morass of exquisitely enervating and agonizing grays. (pp. 195-196) In short, the U.S. government had by 1933 lost the capacity for making moral judgments. It cringed like a coward when asked to make one, and hissed and spat like a rabid animal at the mere suggestion of it. It still does when the subject of Islam comes up. Recognition of the Soviet Union not only granted the murderous Communist dictatorship a moral sanction, it also opened the gates to the wholesale Soviet infiltration and subversive activities of its agents, American sympathizers or "fellow travelers," and members of the Communist Party USA. The Soviets never honored any of the terms of that recognition. The precedent had been set. We can see the insidious parallels today in our government's refusal to withdraw moral sanctions from Islamic r'egimes and its tolerance of terrorist-founded and terrorist state-funded organizations like the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Muslim American Society (MAS) within our own borders. In March 1933, Harry Hopkins, a veteran of former New York Governor Roosevelt's welfare programs, on Roosevelt's invitation joins the new administration, at first running the Federal Emergency Relief Administration (FERA), the Civil Works Administration (CWA) and the Works Progress Administration (WPA). In this pre-war period he also established the National Youth Administration (NYA) and the Federal One Programs for artists and writers. In May 1940, Roosevelt makes Hopkins his first counsel in all matters pertaining to Europe and the new war. Hopkins moves into the Lincoln Bedroom at the White House, his office and residence for the next three and a half years. Hopkins not only advises Roosevelt on foreign policy and war issues, but directs Lend-Lease, a program conceived by Armand Hammer, a notorious Sovietaphile, ostensibly created to aid the British in their fight against the Nazis, but actually intended to aid Josef Stalin and the Soviet Union. Between 1932 and 1933, millions of Russians starved to death as Stalin's government confiscated harvests in the brutal forced collectivization of Russian agriculture. Millions more would perish over the decade from starvation, from being sent as slaves in the Gulag, in mass executions, and in political purges. But 1933, writes West, was a crucial year in American history. In reprising the statements of historians and commentators about the wrongness of recognizing the Soviet r'egime as a legitimate government, given the known horrific consequences of forced collectivization, she states: Dennis J. Dunn agrees with historian David Mayers, who has argued that the failure of the U.S. government under Roosevelt to reckon with the profound crime of the Terror Famine in negotiations over recognition made it - us - "a passive accomplice to Stalin in the Ukraine." I agree. Which makes 1933 the year of America's Fall (p. 243) Diana West steps up to lectern and confronts Professor Kant with some very incisive and inconvenient questions of her own. Who really won World War II? Was it really America's "Good War"? Did the "greatest generation" fight to rid the world of one toxic dictatorship only to enable another to take its place? How is it that the only beneficiary of that war was the Soviet Union, which acquired an Eastern European empire? Were Americans conned, scammed, and robbed throughout the government-perpetuated Depression and then during the war? Who was really establishing American foreign policy in the 1930's and 1940's: Roosevelt, or Stalin through Harry Hopkins, who had Roosevelt's ear 24/7, and countless Soviet agents and traitors embedded in our government dedicated to selling secrets, altruism, self-sacrifice and welfare statism? Hopkins, West suggests, was the Soviets' most important agent in the U.S. government. Whether or not he was "recruited" or "co-opted" by the Soviets, or was a volunteer agent, West was not able to determine with certainty. He is referred to in Soviet cables as "Agent 19." The KGB boasted that he was the Soviet Union's "most important agent." West performs a yeoman's task and gets to the "essence" of that whole sorry and tragic period, proving in her narrative that the reality of our relationship with the Soviets is knowable, and moreover, that its "essence" was ugly, scary, and shameful. I would add, pertaining to all the actors in that period responsible for what West calls the "Big Lie," criminal and treasonous. What precedes and follows West's statement is not for the weak of stomach or faint of heart. With a meticulous and excruciating fealty to the truth, and after exhaustive and often frustrating research (because many documents that once existed and that were evidence of the government's complicity were destroyed or had simply vanished from government archives), West paints a picture of not only FDR's complacency towards Soviet totalitarianism, but Harry Hopkins's contribution to the fall, as well, in addition to that of a legion of liars, fabricators, Communist moles, agents, and spies who populated government positions. If you think the Benghazi cover-up is a classic case of desperate political back-pedaling, official lies and semi-lies, face-saving, and walking away from reality, that episode is merely a miniature of the colossal con pulled on the whole country by Roosevelt and his minions from 1933 onward. West covers several main subjects, among them the extent of Soviet espionage against the U.S. and the extent of Soviet infiltration in our government, an infiltration so common and ubiquitous in numerous Depression Era and wartime agencies that the government was literally top-heavy enough to cause the ship-of-state to list ever Leftward. The government was so saturated with lefties and Communists that they became the de facto architects of domestic and foreign policies. West dates the beginning of the end of a fairly solid and reclaimable constitutional republic - reclaimable from Wilson's Progressive precedents of a central bank, the income tax, and becoming the world's moral policeman, moves which put the country on the road to incremental serfdom - from 1933, when the U.S. recognized the U.S.S.R. as "just another system of government," not much different from our own. Roosevelt, West explains, believed in the "convergence" of our system of government and that of the Soviets. Aside from buttressing his collectivist programs of the New Deal welfare state, the "convergence theory" enabled Roosevelt to be essentially an apolitical pragmatist . There was...one point of ideology that Roosevelt does seem to have fervently embraced, which historian Dennis J. Dunn believes made him an ideologue after all. FDR, Dunn writes, seized on the theory of "convergence" as it applied to the United States and the USSR, the idea being that capitalism and Communism would take on enough characteristics of the other to "converge." ...As Dunn explains it, the convergence theory "held that Soviet Russia and the United States were on convergent paths, where the United States was moving from laissez-faire capitalism to welfare state socialism and the Soviet Union was evolving from totalitarianism to social democracy." (p. 192) There's that Hegelian/Marxist "dialectical" evolutionary force that was somehow ineluctably moving both sides toward "convergence" so that, to the casual observer, when the melding occurred, there wouldn't be a dime's or kopek's worth of difference between the two countries. Human volition and action would have nothing to do with it, neither in acts of Congress nor in executive branch decrees nor in Supreme Court decisions. "Convergence theory" assumed the cognitive powers of a somnambulist. It would "just happen." Don't blame us, counter the advocates of that theory and others. We have nothing to do with it. It's just "history." It would be unfair to both West and her book to attempt anything here other than highlighting some of the revelations she discusses at length throughout American Betrayal . Here are some of them: Lend-Lease Much of West's story focuses on the organized massive theft and redirection of American war productivity to the Soviets that occurred under Lend-Lease. But how did it really begin? As noted above, it was the idea of politically ambidextrous businessman Armand Hammer whose financial and commercial relationship with the Soviets dated back to 1921. (His father, Dr. Julius Hammer, a socialist and later a Communist, named him after the Socialist Labor Party of America's symbol of an arm and hammer.) Worried that a Nazi attack on the Soviet Union would jeopardize his interests in the Soviet Union (and no one in Washington believed the German-Soviet non-aggression pact, signed on August 23rd, 1939, would last), he met with Roosevelt in the White House on November 28th, 1940 and sold the president and Hopkins on the idea of establishing a government entity that would be responsible for aiding the British in their war with Germany (Hopkins later claimed the idea came to him out of the blue), but would actually help Stalin prepare for the expected abrogation of the "non-aggression" pact and enable him to withstand the invasion with American help. It should be noted that this "pact" prepared the way for the co-invasion of Poland by both the Nazis and the Soviets on September 1st, 1939, the spark that began World War II. Both regarded the pact as a temporary truce (in Islam, a hudna contrived to buy time); Stalin wanted to eventually conquer Europe; the Nazis drooled over the oil fields of Baku and the prospect of endless lebensraum . Armand Hammer, who died in 1989, was a walking exemplar of the political "convergence" subscribed to by Roosevelt, a Republican who contributed to Richard Nixon's 1972 presidential campaign, and was a frequent visitor to the White Houses of Presidents Reagan, Carter, and George H.W. Bush. He had met and was on friendly terms with every Soviet dictator but Stalin. Hitler signed the first operational directive to invade the Soviet Union on December 18th, 1940. On March 11, 1941, Congress passed the Lend-Lease bill, and on June 22nd, Hitler invaded Russia. Roosevelt appointed Hopkins as head of Lend-Lease. West details just how much Lend-Lease aided the Soviets. When the U.S. finally entered the war on December 7th, 1941, Hopkins and Lend-Lease gave aiding the Soviets the first priority in planes, tanks, small arms, munitions, Liberty ships, military machine parts, and other materiel, including food, clothing, medical supplies, etc. - over the U.S.'s own warfighting needs . While Americans had to make do with rationed sugar, butter, meat, tires and gasoline, the Soviet government received these things free, without condition, and without interest (on a "loan" which was not expected to ever be paid back by the Soviets, and never was). The Navy and Army had to wait until Soviet quotas were filled before being able to take delivery on their own weaponry and supplies. Harry Hopkins said so, and Roosevelt agreed. West also investigates the likelihood that Hopkins aided the Soviets in acquiring not only information regarding the Manhattan Project to produce the first atomic bomb, but facilitated, through Lend-Lease, the Soviets receiving the actual physical components, such as cadmium rods and uranium, allowing Soviet scientists to fashion their own bomb, first tested in 1949. (pp. 122-123) West writes about the political power Lend-Lease gave Roosevelt and his "co-president," Hopkins. Lend-Lease was ...sold to the American public as a means to keep the United States out of war in Europe - as a substitute for U.S. military involvement, not a means by which to enter the war...The legislation endowed the president with unprecedented powers to bypass the Senate and other checks and balances. For example, Lend-Lease allowed FDR to set the terms of the most massive U.S. expenditures in foreign aid history and their repayment, or nonrepayment. Who, then, needed a Senate to advise and consent on related treaties? The State Department, too, took on attributes of a governmental fifth wheel as Hopkins helmed Lend-Lease and U.S. foreign policy from the White House. (p. 134) Among other things, Singapore, the Philippines and Corregidor fell to the Japanese because all the war materiel that could've saved Americans and the British was instead sent to Russia under Lend-Lease, and FDR and his advisers knew it. Douglas MacArthur had to beg Washington for planes and naval support and relief, but the Soviets came first. Roosevelt said, "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else rather than have the Russian front collapse." (pp. 46-47) The Office of War Information (OWI) West devotes many pages to how the Office of War Information, staffed and controlled largely by Communist Party members, contributed to the white-washing of Soviet Russia, to make "Papa Joe" Stalin and his dictatorship palatable to the American public. Aiding them in this propaganda and agitprop were the press and broadcast luminaries. The overall mantra was: Stalin and Russia were the "good guys," put upon by the "bad guys," the Nazis. Stalin and his r'egime never did a bad thing, they just had a "different" political system, which shouldn't be judged because of the millions it wiped out of existence (those millions never mentioned). This effort ranged from standard pep-talky government propaganda to wartime newsreels to Hollywood movies. The standing orders from the OWI especially were that in no instance was the totalitarian nature of Soviet Russia ever to be revealed, discussed, or even insinuated. A book about novelist Ayn Rand's testimony before the House Un-American Activities Committee in 1947 concerning the propaganda film Song of Russia (1944) is revealing in and of itself. Rand's testimony was solicited because she had escaped Soviet Russia in 1926 and had first-hand knowledge of conditions there. Concerning the lies propagated by the government, one committee member asked her why she objected to the U.S. allying itself with the Soviets to defeat Hitler. Rand answered: That is not what I said. I was not in a position to make that decision. If I were, I would tell you what I would do. That is not what we are discussing. We are discussing the fact that our country was an ally of Russia, and the question is: what should we tell the American people about it - the truth or a lie? If we had good reason, if that is what you believe, all right, then why not tell the truth? Say it is a dictatorship, but we want to be associated with it. Say it is worthwhile being associated with the devil, as Churchill said, in order to defeat another evil which is Hitler. There might be some good argument made for that. But why pretend that Russia was not what it was?** Why pretend, indeed? Because the government didn't want to risk alienating Americans from the war effort. It wouldn't be good for "morale." They might stop buying War Bonds, and demand an end to rationing. They might object to being in league with a devil that wanted to collectivize them, too. Katyn Forest Massacre After Hitler and Stalin had devoured Poland in 1939, both went about "cleansing" Poland of its government and military elements, with the Nazis targeting Polish Jews. We are accustomed to watching videos of the Polish cavalry facing German tanks, but we are rarely informed that in the spring of 1940 the Soviets murdered between 15,000 and 22,000 Polish officers and policemen in Katyn Forest to remove any chance of the Poles resisting the Soviet occupation. Initial blame was put on the equally blood-thirsty Nazis, but it was the Nazis who discovered the mass graves after capturing that region from the Soviets, and who brought in several American and British POWs to see for themselves (hoping to put a chink in the American-Soviet alliance), among them Americans Capt. Donald B. Stewart and Lt. Col. John H. Van Vliet Jr. Stewart later testified before a Congressional committee about what he saw, and Van Vliet wrote two memos, one of which was put into an Orwellian memory hole - by Alger Hiss in the State Department. This information was relayed to Roosevelt, so he and Hopkins knew about the massacre. They suppressed the information. The country would not learn about it until 1950, when Stewart delivered his testimony. Russia would not confess to the massacre until 1990. Diana West discusses this whole shameful episode in her ground-breaking book. (pp. 202-218) The Nuremberg Trials Another issue that sent Diana West off on a wholly justified tear was the hypocrisy of the Nuremberg Trials , two sets of them between November 1945 and October 1946, with the U.S. conducting separate trials in its occupied zone in Germany. Two Soviet judges sat in judgment of their fellow killers, the Germans, alongside their American, British and French colleagues, and one Soviet chief prosecutor argued that justice be meted out to the Germans in the dock. The presiding Soviet judge, Major General Iona Nikitchenko, had previously presided over some of the notorious show trials in the1930's during the Great Purge. But all the judges at Nuremberg took part in a conspiracy of silence about the enormity of guilt shared by Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union in the way of massacres, purges, beginning WWII by invading Poland with Germany, and policies of extermination. West noted: The fact is, not a jot about the Soviet criminal case came to judgment at Nuremberg - not the NKVD massacre of some twenty thousand Polish officers known as the Katyn Forest Massacre (charged to the Germans), not the forced "repatriation" of some two million Soviet-claimed refugees, which occurred thanks to essential assistance from British and U.S. troops - our very own war crime - which was still underway in Germany and elsewhere even as Nuremberg unfolded. (p. 55) No one was supposed to raise so much as an eyebrow, if the ghastly details of Nazi depredations described during the trials seemed to resemble the ghastly details of Soviet depredations. The Soviets commit such crimes? Perish the thought. And thought did indeed perish. Stalin's insistence on a "second front" The conduct of the war was more or less dictated by Stalin and adapted as necessary by Roosevelt and his Hopkins-picked general military staff, which included Generals Dwight D. Eisenhower and George C. Marshall. Stalin's idea was, first, to prolong the war as long as necessary, in order for the Soviets to better defend itself against the Nazis; and second, that the British and Americans should open up a "second front" by invading France. Winston Churchill, increasingly the odd-man-out in the triumvirate, argued fruitlessly to open up the new front by invading through the Balkans or through Italy, the better to cut off Soviet advances into central Europe. Unlike Roosevelt, he had no illusions about Stalin's master plan and motives. Both Roosevelt and Stalin knew alsowhat Churchill was certain would happen if the Soviet armies were able to overrun Eastern Europe and also Germany: those countries would remain under Soviet rule. Roosevelt, the "great liberator," was comfortable with the idea. West writes, quoting Francis Cardinal Spellman's recollections from his September 3rd, 1943 meeting with Roosevelt: "The European people will simply have to endure the Russian domination in the hope that in ten or twenty years they will be able to live well with the Russians," Spellman recounted FDR saying at this pre-Tehran, pre-Yalta moment. Finland, Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Bessarabia, the eastern half of Poland, Czecho-Slovakia, Austria, Hungary, Croatia, Germany - FDR conceded all to Communist r'egimes or Soviet protection! What is most weird and most disturbing about Roosevelt's obdurate fatalism is that the entire Red Army at this time was still inside the USSR . (p. 266) Of course Roosevelt's "fatalism" saved him the necessity of making a moral judgment. That was moral relativism at work, his "convergence" kicking in to relieve him of all responsibility for the certain misery and deaths that were sure to follow a Soviet occupation of Eastern Europe. Don't bother me, don't bother me. I don't want to know. And so Eisenhower became Supreme Allied Commander and began planning D-Day. German overtures to end war in 1943 rejected Integral to understanding why Stalin wanted his "second front" is West's revelations that not only was there an extensive German underground dedicated to ridding the country of Hitler and ending the war - an underground the U.S. refused to assist or aid in any way - but that Roosevelt, beholden to Stalin, rejected several overtures from high-ranking German officers to kill or incarcerate Hitler, establish a provisional, non-Nazi government, and sue for peace - but on the condition that German forces released from fighting the British and Americans be free to repel the Red Army from Germany and other regions then held by the Nazis. The war could have ended in 1943, long before the costly D-Day invasion through France in June 1944. Had that surrender happened, D-Day would never have taken place. It wouldn't have been necessary. Churchill, sympathetic to the idea, was helpless. Stalin wanted Germany reduced to rubble. A German surrender in 1943 would have been premature for Stalin and spoiled his plans to conquer as much of Europe as possible without bumping into Anglo-American forces coming from the west. He insisted on a "second front" and Roosevelt obliged him, with Churchill's strategic advice shunted to the side as irrelevant. All the men in the conspiracy to stage a coup d''etat against Hitler were subsequently executed by Hitler's henchmen, including Admiral Wilhelm Canaris, chief of German military intelligence, who had been aiding British intelligence, and who was baffled by Roosevelt's resistance. (pp. 282-286, pp. 308-309) The repatriation of Russians and Europeans to the Soviets by British and American forces, on order from Washington, was another shameful episode discussed by West, one not known to very many Americans. Ordering General Patton to stop his pell-mell drive so that the Red Army could take Berlin is a bit of history that hasn't been covered up. There is the issue of tens of thousands of American and British POWs in German camps being "liberated" by the Red Army and subsequently incarcerated in Soviet labor camps. There is one pre-war episode not mentioned by West but which has always stuck in my mind, one I read about long ago as a teen and which inaugurated my suspicions that WWII was not entirely conducted as I'd read in history books. This was story about the S.S. St. Louis , which left Hamburg, Germany in May 1939 with 900 Jewish refugees escaping Nazi persecution. After being turned away by Cuba, the ship called on Miami, Florida. No one was allowed to enter the country because of an annual quota on immigrants. After being rebuffed by the Canadians, as well, the ship sailed to Antwerp, where many of the passengers were taken in by Britain, Belgium, France, and the Netherlands. When the Nazis invaded the Continental countries, there was no escape for the remaining 620 passengers taken in by those countries. It is estimated that 254 of them died from one Nazi reason or another. My point here is that the U.S.'s ersatz immigrant quota system denied all those passengers a chance to survive and live. Today, we allow the virtually unlimited immigration of Muslims, and are contemplating allowing millions of illegal Mexican aliens, under the rubric of "amnesty," to remain here to better ensure a Democratic victory in 2016. This is a form of "convergence" not even Roosevelt could have contemplated or imagined. He opened the gates to one form of enemy; Obama and his minions continue to open them to another. Diana West has done this country a favor by putting between two covers the record of a long, disgraceful period in American history. She will not receive very many thanks or compliments for having done so. She is likely to be reviled and smeared, when it is Franklin D. Roosevelt's person and record that should be reviled, together with the Soviets' top agent, Harry Hopkins. Moral and political relativism, she demonstrated, allowed the U.S. to tolerate the Soviets and their murderous totalitarian r'egime in the Red Decade, and then become an "ally" with it to crush a rival totalitarian r'egime, that of the Nazis. It inoculated Roosevelt, a political pragmatist with strong left-wing premises, against knowledge of the terrible and freedom-destroying nature of Communism, while, au contraire , at the same time allowed him and his agents to decry the terrible and freedom-destroying nature of Nazism. West's book initially began as an enquiry into why 9/11 was met with the government's ambivalence and delusions about the nature of Islam. Observing the inroads Islam and Sharia law were making in the U.S., she was certain that Islam was not so much a primitive religion as an all-encompassing totalitarian ideology, one as committed to conquest and slavery as had been Nazism, Communism, and Shintoism. If the government had raised the hue and cry about the evils of Nazism, why not about the evils of Islam? Because Roosevelt, Hopkins, and their allies in the State Department and other government entities practiced their own brand of uncritical "outreach" to Communism and the Soviet Union. Her search for an answer led her to discover and uncover, as far as the surviving records permitted her, all the lies and truths about Roosevelt, Harry Hopkins, Stalin, Communism, and the real reasons why the U.S. was drawn into a war whose only real victor was the Soviet Union. No hue and cry was ever raised by anyone in power about the evils of Communism, she discovered. Why not? And those few who did raise the hue and cry were mocked, smeared, marginalized, discredited, ignored, and banished from serious discussion. Why? What would permit our government, the leader of the "free world," to participate in and perpetuate the suppression of the truth about Communism and the Soviet Union, and to enlarge the area of the unfree world with an insouciant cry of C'est la vie ? What would motivate it to con Americans year after year and throughout a devastating war? If our national character is defined as one of incorrigible individualism and freedom from fiat or arbitrary coercion, what had happened to it? These were the questions she sought answers to. One answer she learned was that by 1933, our government had indeed reached another kind of "convergence," one in which truth and liberty met power-lust at a vector point and were demolished by a craving for power over men as a means of having power over reality, and that such power-lust would readily discard all principles and all commitment to upholding not just the Constitution, but the value of freedom. West does not go into the history of that growing power, which can be traced back to certain ideas and actions taken by men in government in the 19th and early 20th centuries to implement those ideas, and advocated by numerous groups, the most prominent of which were the Progressives. On one hand, the culprits did not value the truth. On the other, they feared its power and went to extraordinary lengths to suppress it, erected ideological barricades to block it from public knowledge, and punished those who spoke the truth or threatened to tell the truth. It's all here in American Betrayal . Read it at your own risk. West's lesson to Americans: Reality can't be redacted, buried, fabricated, falsified, or omitted. Her book is eloquent proof of it. * American Betrayal: The Secret Assault on Our Nation's Character, by Diana West. New York: St. Martin's Press, 2013. http://ruleofreason.blogspot.com/2013/06/our-enemy-inside-gates.html http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=81f_1371330063 Detroit Iron Our Enemy Inside the Gates Roosevelt, Churchill, Stalin Sun, 02 Jun 2013 17:45:42 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=06a_1370208972 mangimages5 A ride on a rare 1930 Waco Taperwing in Delavan Wisconsin on 6/1/13 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=06a_1370208972 mangimages5 <span class="highlight">1930</span> Waco Taperwing ride waco taperwing 1930, plane, rare, cool, neat, Delavan, Wisconsin Thu, 23 May 2013 19:35:30 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=636_1369351448 Regenbogenleiche just ordered two books of her. most amazing and inspiring person i have ever seen... wiki: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helen_Keller http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=636_1369351448 Regenbogenleiche Helen Keller, <span class="highlight">1930</span>: deaf-mute and blind author speaks helen, keller, deaf, mute, deaf-mute, deaf mute, blind, author, 1930, facinating, amazing, motivation, optimism Thu, 23 May 2013 00:25:17 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6a0_1369281238 RickBond From the 1930's. THIS IS NOT FOR EVERYONE!! Click wisely!!! Inside an animation studio making a cartoon http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6a0_1369281238 RickBond Inside a <span class="highlight">1930</span>'s Cartoon Studio Cartoon, studio, 1930s Sun, 09 Jun 2013 23:34:45 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=20e_1370834390 thecleaner001 Part 2 of the Berlin story. Despite it been a silent film the pathos is palpable... http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=20e_1370834390 thecleaner001 The Symphony of a Great City Part 2 Berlin,Part2,silent film,feel the depth,1930's,the Fatherland, Fri, 31 May 2013 18:31:24 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=da1_1370039173 Panzerknacker2 Car of the future, 1930. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=da1_1370039173 Panzerknacker2 R -100 R -100 car vintage Wed, 29 May 2013 01:31:44 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=cc4_1369804784 AlexanderSigal The Palace of Soviets, with a planned height of 420 meters (40 meters taller than the Empire State Building) and topped by a huge statue of Vladimir Lenin, was the biggest of these stillborn projects scheduled to be implemented in Soviet Moscow in the 1930s and 1940s. The project was never constructed, and in 1959 it was decided to use its substructure as a foundation for the Moskva open-air swimming pool. Today the Cathedral of Christ the Savior, a reconstruction of the church that was demolished to make way for the Palace of Soviets, once again occupies the site. In 1947, the USSR Council of Ministers made the decision to build eight skyscrapers in Moscow. Seven were actually built, while the eighth, located in the Zaryadye area, was abandoned at an early stage. Its podium was used in the construction of the Rossiya hotel. The Rossiya hotel was demolished in 2006. Today the site is vacant; the Moscow authorities plan to lay out a modern park there with cutting-edge infrastructure: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IPLFUjPNBk In the 1930s, a tender was held for the design of a complex of buildings for the USSR People's Commissariat of Heavy Industry. Had the project been implemented, Red Square would have become much wider, since demolition of the Upper Shopping Arcade, which stood on the present location of the GUM department store, was planned. With the Commissariat project discarded, the Upper Shopping Arcade was reconstructed and transformed into what we know today as GUM. (Government's Universal MagazineOR ). In 1930, a House of Books hosting many publishing houses and a large bookstore was due to be built on Orlikov Street. The first stage was built along the street by 1933, but the second stage was never undertaken. The design was revised because Soviet architecture had begun leaning toward the classical school. Photo: The part of the House of Books project that was built. In the 1920s, the painter, architect and art theorist El Lissitzky suggested building so-called horizontal skyscrapers on Trubnaya Square along the Boulevard Ring. Photo collage: "Horizontal skyscrapers" on Trubnaya Square. Today, a modern business center overlooks Trubnaya Square instead of the "horizontal skyscrapers." In 1927, a new home for the headquarters of Izvestia newspaper was erected on Pushkinskaya Square. All the architects involved proposed various high-rise solutions. But eventually the design that we can see today on Pushkinskaya Square was chosen and built. In 1934, the USSR Council of People's Commissars ordered the transfer of the Academy of Sciences from Leningrad to Moscow. A site near Krymsky Bridge was chosen for the Presidium of the Academy of Sciences. In 1941, construction work was stopped by the war. By the late 1960s, it was decided that the site would host a park of arts and a new exhibition complex - the Central House of Artists - and a new branch of the Tretyakov Gallery. Read more at http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=fd7_1369713567#JmFEOpJWH5iBaxTq.99 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=cc4_1369804784 AlexanderSigal Ghosts of the USSR: 7 Awesome Projects in Moscow that Remained on Paper Read more at http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=fd7_1369713567#JmFEOpJWH5iBaxTq.99 Moscow, old, Russia, never built Tue, 28 May 2013 00:36:13 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=fd7_1369713567 AlexanderSigal The Palace of Soviets, with a planned height of 420 meters (40 meters taller than the Empire State Building) and topped by a huge statue of Vladimir Lenin, was the biggest of these stillborn projects scheduled to be implemented in Soviet Moscow in the 1930s and 1940s: The project was never constructed, and in 1959 it was decided to use its substructure as a foundation for the Moskva open-air swimming pool. Today the Cathedral of Christ the Savior, a reconstruction of the church that was demolished to make way for the Palace of Soviets, once again occupies the site. In 1947, the USSR Council of Ministers made the decision to build eight skyscrapers in Moscow. Seven were actually built, while the eighth, located in the Zaryadye area, was abandoned at an early stage. Its podium was used in the construction of the Rossiya hotel. The Rossiya hotel was demolished in 2006. Today the site is vacant; the Moscow authorities plan to lay out a modern park there with cutting-edge infrastructure: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IPLFUjPNBk In the 1930s, a tender was held for the design of a complex of buildings for the USSR People's Commissariat of Heavy Industry. Had the project been implemented, Red Square would have become much wider, since demolition of the Upper Shopping Arcade, which stood on the present location of the GUM department store, was planned. With the Commissariat project discarded, the Upper Shopping Arcade was reconstructed and transformed into what we know today as GUM. (Government's Universal MagazineOR ). In 1930, a House of Books hosting many publishing houses and a large bookstore was due to be built on Orlikov Street. The first stage was built along the street by 1933, but the second stage was never undertaken. The design was revised because Soviet architecture had begun leaning toward the classical school. Photo: The part of the House of Books project that was built. In the 1920s, the painter, architect and art theorist El Lissitzky suggested building so-called horizontal skyscrapers on Trubnaya Square along the Boulevard Ring. Photo collage: "Horizontal skyscrapers" on Trubnaya Square. Today, a modern business center overlooks Trubnaya Square instead of the "horizontal skyscrapers." In 1927, a new home for the headquarters of Izvestia newspaper was erected on Pushkinskaya Square. All the architects involved proposed various high-rise solutions. But eventually the design that we can see today on Pushkinskaya Square was chosen and built. In 1934, the USSR Council of People's Commissars ordered the transfer of the Academy of Sciences from Leningrad to Moscow. A site near Krymsky Bridge was chosen for the Presidium of the Academy of Sciences. In 1941, construction work was stopped by the war. By the late 1960s, it was decided that the site would host a park of arts and a new exhibition complex - the Central House of Artists - and a new branch of the Tretyakov Gallery. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=fd7_1369713567 AlexanderSigal Ghosts of the USSR: 7 Awesome Projects in Moscow that Remained on Paper Moscow, Russia, history, park, Hotel Rossiya, never built, project, architecture, old, modern, classic, building, construction