Liveleak.com Rss Feed -

Canada MPs pass anti-terror bill

10fold — Wed, 24 Apr 2013 23:07:16 -0400

Bill would increase existing penalties for certain terrorism-related offences CBC News Posted: Apr 24, 2013 5:18 PM ET Last Updated: Apr 24, 2013 10:15 PM ET Read 173comments173 A bill that would revive some provisions of Canada's Anti-terrorism Act passed in the House of Commons Wednesday night. The Liberals joined the Conservatives to pass the bill - known as S-7, the combating terrorism act - by a vote of 183 to 93. It would bring back two central provisions that were originally instituted by the Jean Chr'etien government after the Sept. 11 attacks in New York in 2001 but were "sunsetted" after a five-year period. One allowed for "preventative detention," meaning someone can be held without charge for up to three days just on suspicion of being involved in terrorism. The person can then be bound by certain probationary conditions for up to a year, and if he or she refuses the conditions, can be jailed for 12 months. The second provides for an "investigative hearing" in which someone suspected of having knowledge of a terrorist act can be forced to answer questions. The objective is not to prosecute the person for a criminal offence, but merely to gather information. If he or she refuses, that person can be imprisoned for up to 12 months. When the Harper government, during its first term, tried to bring back the terrorism measures in 2007, the Liberals opposed the move. Now, however, the government has Liberal support and only the official Opposition, the NDP, is protesting the bill. Bill S-7 would also amend the Criminal Code and other acts to increase existing penalties for certain terrorism-related offences and introduce new terrorism offences to prohibit individuals from leaving Canada for the purpose of committing terrorist acts, among other changes. The bill has already been through the Senate, and has been awaiting third reading in the Commons for months, but was rushed suddenly into debate on Monday in the wake of the Boston Marathon bombings. A final vote expected Tuesday was deferred for a day. Opposition critics have accused the government of trying to exploit the events in Boston and have skeptically pointed out the coincidence of pushing the bill to debate on the same day a major terrorist arrest was announced in Toronto. In debate, the NDP pointed out it had proposed 17 amendments to the bill at the committee stage, but all were rejected by the Conservatives, who dominate the committee. The Liberals proposed no amendments. http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2013/04/24/pol-anti-terror-bill-s7-vote.html

THE UTTER INSANITY OF OBAMA AND THE CIA STARTING WORLD WAR 3 IN THE MIDDLE EAST!!!!!!!

True Prophet — Wed, 24 Apr 2013 20:43:21 -0400

THE UTTER INSANITY OF OBAMA AND THE CIA STARTING WORLD WAR 3 IN THE MIDDLE EAST!!!!!!! MUST READ DOCUMENTS Benghazi CIA Compound Attack Explained- Behind the Lies to Start World War 3 http://www.scribd.com/doc/116766999/Benghazi-CIA-Compound-Attack-Explained-Behind-the-Lies-to-Start-World-War-3 Benghazi Explained- Interview With an 'Intelligence Insider' http://www.scribd.com/doc/116756604/Benghazi-Explained-Interview-With-an-Intelligence-Insider Chaffetz- State Dept Hiding Benghazi Survivors http://www.scribd.com/doc/116756607/Chaffetz-State-Dept-Hiding-Benghazi-Survivors WHITE HOUSE INSIDER- 'Barack Obama - The Butcher of Benghazi' http://www.scribd.com/doc/116767020/WHITE-HOUSE-INSIDER-Barack-Obama-%E2%80%93-The-Butcher-of-Benghazi Documents Released Pertaining to Security at the Bengazi CIA Villa http://www.scribd.com/doc/116759802/Documents-Released-Pertaining-to-Security-at-the-Bengazi-CIA-Villa Photos of Bengazi CIA Villa Before and After the 9-11-12 Attack http://www.scribd.com/doc/116759271/Photos-of-Bengazi-CIA-Villa-Before-and-After-the-9-11-12-Attack Benghazi CIA Compound Attack Explained- Behind the Lies to Start World War 3 Please comment on this article at Canada Free Press By Douglas J. Hagmann 2 December 2012: Author's note: This is a special supplement of a multi-part interview with a government insider intimately familiar with the events that took place in Benghazi. It is important to note that the information contained in this series was developed from interviews that spanned over 100 hours. My source requested that the following information be written separately due to its importance. DH: You told me that you wanted to talk about the lies behind Benghazi, said it is critical for everyone to understand the reason for the lies. and asked that we do this separately. Go ahead. II: It's about the lie, and once you understand it, it becomes extremely revealing. It's about what the public has been told from the very beginning. Do you realize that a lot of people, especially Obama's associates and supporters do not believe that they've been lied to? Do you understand that much of the public does not believe that they were lied to? Like a lot of us, you're in this thing so deep that we forget not everyone even believes they've been lied to. They're certainly not going to hear about it in the media. To understand how deep this goes, how important it is, and why it is so important, we've got to go back to the very beginning. Think back to when we were first told that Ambassador Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Dougherty, Tyrone Woods were killed in Benghazi. The media reported that Stevens and the others were killed in an attack on the American consulate in Benghazi. Every major media outlet identified the location of the attack as an American consulate, much like this Reuters report and this from The Washington Times. But there was no U.S. consulate in Benghazi, so where did this information originate? DH: Didn't the administration call it a consulate? II: Exactly. Our embassies and consulate offices are directly under the control of the U.S. State Department. They are areas of sovereign territory. Consulate offices are like satellite offices to each embassy, and they are located in convenient geographic locations in other countries to assist people with routine or minor matters, saving them a trip to the actual embassy. Consulates are easily identifiable and all have U.S. flags flying prominently for easy identification. A listing of U.S. embassies and consulate offices in other countries can be found on the State Department web site. Just about everyone working at State knows the locations of the embassies and consulates, as do most of our leaders in the executive branch. So from the outset, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama certainly knew, without any doubt, that there was no consulate or diplomatic mission in Benghazi. None. In fact, on August 27, 2012, just 15 days before the attack in Benghazi, Ambassador Chris Stevens ceremoniously opened the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli with the U.S. State Department issuing press releases and official statements. Tripoli was the only diplomatic mission in Libya - period. And it was just established. So one of the very first lies was to deliberate misidentify or improperly characterize the compound in Benghazi as a consulate. Was there an American flag flying outside of this compound? No. Was any diplomatic legitimate business being conducted at this compound? No. But they called it a consulate to draw attention away from the fact this was a CIA base of operations. It was located in a relatively rural area, and it consisted of a residence and a separate "annex" located about 1800 feet away. By car, the annex was just over a mile away. It was difficult to find, too. People coming from Tripoli to this compound often got turned around, even with the help of a GPS. So the very first thing everyone must understand is that the administration, including Barack Obama and others in the executive branch, and the State Department, including Hillary Clinton (her official statement identified the compound as a mission, suggesting a 'diplomatic mission') knew that this compound served no legitimate diplomatic purpose. That's the first lie. DH: We now know that it was a CIA compound located in a somewhat rural area and not identifiable as U.S. owned or operated. II: Correct. So think about this. The compound was unmarked, operationally discreet, located in a rural area and difficult to find. How did a few hundred protesters suddenly gather at this location on the evening of 9/11? How did they know where to go, if this was not an embassy or consulate? More to the point, how is it possible that anyone in any official capacity in this administration could realistically describe the attack in terms of a protest gone bad, even at the first reports of trouble? They could not. This was a deliberate lie to the American people. So how is it that U.S. Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice, five days after the attack and after much of the initial dust settled, appeared on five national news shows and still attributed the murders of Americans as a result of protests? Who told her to do that? And, she continued to blame the murders on an obscure internet video. Why? DH: They have since publicly reclassified the description of the location. II: They had to because they could not continue to call the CIA operations center an embassy or consulate. But they have yet to offer any reasonable explanation for what happened there. Barack Obama has yet to look the family members of Tyrone Woods, Sean Smith, or Glen Dougherty in the eyes and tell the truth. He has yet to tell Americans the truth about the events of 9/11, and the reason for the lies, which continue through today. No one has stepped up to tell the truth. We have only seen denials reinforced by distractions., They continue to lie to this day. Who are they lying to and what is the logical reason for the lies? They are only lying to the American people. All other governments know what's going on. And most importantly, the reason they are continuing to lie is to cover up their plans as they are moving forward with their agenda. Everyone must understand how important this is. The Obama plan continues. No one is stopping them or this agenda. And in case you have any questions about what this agenda is, let me explain it clearly and concisely. Obama, Clinton, their foreign policy advisors and the people involved in this agenda intend to start a war that will make Afghanistan and Iraq look like a small police action by comparison. They are going to start a war that will likely grow from a regional war to a global war, or WW III. Afghanistan 'imploded' when attacked, as did Iraq. Syria will not, it will explode . Do the American people understand this? Until now, everyone has been focused on the 'little lies.' The security, the misidentification of the CIA compound, the timeline, and on and on. They want us to focus on the little lies so they can pull off the BIG LIE . The big lie being told is that the U.S. is merely providing minimal support, including humanitarian aid to the Syrians so they can defend themselves from Assad. That's the big lie that covers up what they are really doing in the region. The CIA compound in Benghazi was a logistics hub for weapons, but not only weapons from Libya. Weapons ordered by and destined for other countries, like Saudi Arabia, the UAE and other countries, knowing the plan, were allowing the weapons to be diverted, with Libya acting as the central shipping hub. When Assad falls and U.S. troops are called in for ground support, who will they be fighting? The Syrian army? No, they will be fighting the Iranian army, the Russian army and the Chinese army. Why? Because Iran, Russia and China all have a stake in the region. Putin called Syria his red line in the sand, and stated that WW III will start in Syria, not Iran. Benghazi is a moving target of little lies that serve as cover for the big lie. Are Americans onboard? http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/archives/7210#more-7210 Statement by Secretary Clinton on the Attack in Benghazi Press Statement Hillary Rodham Clinton Secretary of State Washington, DC September 11, 2012 I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. As we work to secure our personnel and facilities, we have confirmed that one of our State Department officers was killed. We are heartbroken by this terrible loss. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family and those who have suffered in this attack. This evening, I called Libyan President Magariaf to coordinate additional support to protect Americans in Libya. President Magariaf expressed his condemnation and condolences and pledged his government's full cooperation. Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind. In light of the events of today, the United States government is working with partner countries around the world to protect our personnel, our missions, and American citizens worldwide. http://statedept.tumblr.com/post/31380336590/statement-by-secretary-clinton-on-the-attack-in Libyans burn U.S. Consulate in Benghazi; U.S. official killed Egyptian protesters climb the walls of the U.S. Embassy during a protest in Cairo on Tuesday, Sept. 11, 2012. (AP Photo/Nasser Nasser) By Ashish Kumar Sen - The Washington Times Tuesday, September 11, 2012 A U.S. official was killed and others injured when an armed mob attacked the U.S. Consulate in Libya's eastern port city of Benghazi on Tuesday. The building has burned down, according to multiple sources in Libya. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton condemned "in the strongest terms" the attack. Mrs. Clinton confirmed that one State Department officer had been killed. "We are heartbroken by this terrible loss," she said. Mrs. Clinton spoke on the phone with Libyan National Assembly President Mohamed Yousef Al-Megariaf to coordinate protection of Americans in his country. The mob in Benghazi was angry over a video reportedly produced in the U.S., which they said was insulting to Islam's prophet, Muhammad. "Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet," Mrs. Clinton said. The U.S. deplores "any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. ... But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind," she added. Earlier, State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland blamed "a group of militants" for the attack. "We are working with the Libyans now to secure the compound," she said in a statement on Tuesday night. "We condemn in strongest terms this attack on our diplomatic mission," she added. In Egypt's capital, Cairo, protesters stormed the U.S. Embassy and tore down the flag. This is the second time the U.S. mission in Benghazi has been attacked. In June, a bomb exploded outside the U.S. diplomatic mission soon after the U.S. confirmed the death of Abu Yahya al-Libi, a Libyan-born cleric and al Qaeda operative, in a drone attack in Pakistan. Al Qaeda leader confirmed al-Libi's death in a message delivered on Tuesday to mark the 11th anniversary of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on the U.S. The revolution against Moammar Gadhafi's regime first started in Benghazi in February of 2011. The uprising quickly spread across Libya and toppled the 42-year-old dictatorship of Gadhafi, who was killed in the custody of rebels in his hometown of Sirte on Oct. 20 last year. About the Author Ashish Kumar Sen Ashish Kumar Sen is a reporter covering foreign policy and international developments for The Washington Times. Prior to joining The Times, Mr. Sen worked for publications in Asia and the Middle East. His work has appeared in a number of publications and online news sites including the British Broadcasting Corp., Asia Times Online and Outlook magazine. http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/sep/11/libyans-storm-burn-us-consulate-benghazi/ Obama vows to track down ambassador's killers . . inShare 0 . Share this . . Email . Print Related News . Intrepid U.S. envoy Stevens nurtured Libyan democracy Wed, Sep 12 2012 . Smoke, confusion and a missing ambassador in Libya attack Wed, Sep 12 2012 . Obama vows justice after U.S. envoy killed in Libya Wed, Sep 12 2012 . U.S.-trained engineer picked as Libya's next premier Wed, Sep 12 2012 . Top U.S. military officer calls pastor over film Wed, Sep 12 2012 . U.S. evacuates staff from Benghazi, cuts Tripoli embassy staff Wed, Sep 12 2012 . New York police add security in wake of Libya protests Wed, Sep 12 2012 By Matt Spetalnick and Hadeel Al Shalchi WASHINGTON/BENGHAZI, Libya Wed Sep 12, 2012 7:49pm EDT WASHINGTON/BENGHAZI, Libya (Reuters) - President Barack Obama branded the killing of the U.S. ambassador to Libya and three other Americans an "outrageous attack" on Wednesday and vowed to track down the perpetrators, while ordering a tightening of diplomatic security worldwide. The ambassador, Christopher Stevens, and the other Americans were killed after Islamist gunmen attacked the U.S. consulate and a safe house refuge in Benghazi on Tuesday night. The attackers were part of a mob blaming America for a film they said insulted the Prophet Mohammad. The violence in the eastern city, a cradle of Libya's U.S.-backed uprising against Muammar Gaddafi last year, came on the anniversary of al Qaeda's attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001. Another assault was mounted on the U.S. embassy in Cairo in which protesters, who included Islamists and teenage soccer fans, tore down and burned a U.S. flag. U.S. government officials said the Benghazi attack may have been planned in advance and there were indications that members of a militant faction calling itself Ansar al Sharia - which translates as Supporters of Islamic Law - may have been involved. They also said some reporting from the region suggested that members of Al-Qaeda's north Africa-based affiliate, known as Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, may have been involved. "It bears the hallmarks of an organized attack," one U.S. official said. However, some U.S. officials cautioned against assuming that the attacks were deliberately organized to coincide with the September 11 anniversary. The violence in Benghazi and Cairo threatened to spread to other Muslim countries on Wednesday. A U.S. official said Washington had ordered the evacuation of all U.S. personnel from Benghazi to Tripoli and was reducing staffing in the capital to emergency levels. Police fired teargas at angry demonstrators outside the U.S. embassy in Tunisia and several hundred people gathered in front of the U.S. embassy in Sudan. In Morocco, a few dozen protesters burned American flags and chanted slogans near the U.S. consulate in Casablanca. Obama vowed on Wednesday to bring the Benghazi killers to justice. He called the attack "outrageous and shocking" but insisted it would not threaten relations with Libya's new elected government. U.S. SECURITY STEPPED UP WORLDWIDE The president said he had ordered an increase in security at U.S. diplomatic posts around the globe. A U.S. official said a Marine anti-terrorist security team was being sent to Libya to boost security there. The attacks could alter U.S. attitudes towards the wave of revolutions across the Arab world, which toppled secularist authoritarian leaders in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia , bringing Islamists to power. The violence could also have an impact on the closely-fought U.S. presidential election campaign. Mitt Romney , Obama's rival in the November vote, criticized the president's response to the crisis. He said the timing of a statement from the U.S. embassy in Cairo denouncing "efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims" made Obama look weak as protesters were attacking U.S. missions. He said it was "disgraceful" to be seen to be apologizing for American values of free speech. Obama's campaign accused Romney of scoring political points at a time of national tragedy. Images of ambassador Stevens purportedly taken after he died circulated on the Internet. One image showed him being carried, with a white shirt pulled up and a cut on his forehead. Libya's Deputy Interior Minister Wanis Al-Sharif said U.S. staff were rushed to a Benghazi safe house after the initial attack on the consulate and an evacuation plane with U.S. commando units then arrived from Tripoli to evacuate them from the safe house. "It was supposed to be a secret place and we were surprised the armed groups knew about it. There was shooting," Sharif said. Two U.S. personnel were killed there, he said. Two other people were killed at the main consular building and between 12 and 17 wounded. The attack raised questions about the future U.S. diplomatic presence in Libya, relations between Washington and Tripoli, and the unstable security situation after Gaddafi's overthrow. Witnesses said the mob included tribesmen, militia and other gunmen. Hamam, a 17-year-old who took part in the attack, said Ansar al-Sharia cars arrived at the start of the protest but left once fighting started. "The protesters were running around the compound just looking for Americans, they just wanted to find an American so they could catch one," he said. "WE STARTED SHOOTING AT THEM" "We started shooting at them, and then some other people also threw hand-made bombs over the fences and started the fires in the buildings," he said. "There was some Libyan security for the embassy outside but when the hand-made bombs went off they ran off and left." Hamam said he saw an American die in front of him in the mayhem that ensued. He said the body was covered in ash. The "Innocence of Muslims," the film blamed for provoking the violence, was the work of a California-based Israeli filmmaker Sam Bacile, according to a report by the Associated Press. It portrays Mohammad as a fool, a philanderer and a religious fake and in one clip posted on YouTube, he was shown in an apparent sexual act with a woman. For many Muslims it is blasphemous even to show a depiction of the Prophet. Bacile, who described himself to AP as an Israeli Jew, spoke to the agency from hiding on Tuesday. He said that the film, which cost $5 million to make, was intended as a political statement and was financed by more than 100 Jewish donors. Egypt's Coptic Orthodox Church, meanwhile, condemned Copts living abroad who it said had financed "the production of a film insulting the Prophet Mohammad". About a 10th of Egypt's 83 million people are Christian. Western countries denounced the Benghazi killings and Russia expressed deep concern, saying the episode underscored the need for global cooperation to fight "the evil of terrorism." Many Muslim states focused their condemnation on the film and will be concerned about preventing a repeat of the fallout seen after publication in a Danish newspaper of cartoons of the Prophet Mohammad. This touched off riots in the Middle East, Africa and Asia in 2006 in which at least 50 people died. Afghan President Hamid Karzai called the making of the movie a "devilish act" but said he was certain those involved in its production were a very small minority. The U.S. embassy in Kabul appealed to Afghan leaders for help in "maintaining calm" and Afghanistan shut down the YouTube site so Afghans would not be able to see the film. General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the U.S. military's Joint Chiefs of Staff, took the unusual step of telephoning a radical Florida Pastor, Terry Jones, and asking him to withdraw his support for the film. Earlier provocative acts by Jones, like publicly burning a Koran, had sparked Muslim unrest. In Egypt, Prime Minister Hisham Kandil called on Washington to act against the film's makers for stirring up strife but condemned the violence saying that they had "no relation to the (U.S.) government." "SMALL AND SAVAGE GROUP" U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the attack was the work of a "small and savage group." Abdel-Monem Al-Hurr, spokesman for Libya's Supreme Security Committee, said Libyan security forces came under heavy fire and "were not prepared for the intensity of the attack." Libya's interim government has struggled to impose its authority on a myriad of armed groups that refused to lay down their weapons and often take the law into their own hands. Security experts say the area around Benghazi is host to a number of Islamist militant groups who oppose any Western presence in Muslim countries. U.S. ambassadors in such volatile countries as Libya have tight security, usually travelling in well-protected convoys. Diplomatic missions are normally protected by Marines or other special forces. Tributes poured in to honor Stevens, who said in a video posted on the embassy website of his involvement in the Libyan revolution: "I was thrilled to watch the Libyan people stand up and demand their rights." Stevens, who was 52, grew up in California, graduated from Berkeley and worked in North Africa as a Peace Corps volunteer. He taught English in Morocco before joining the foreign service where he worked in the Middle East and North Africa. The worst-case scenario for Western governments is that the spate of recent unrest in Libya could be the start of an Iraq-style insurgency by Islamist militants. That could hit oil exports as the energy sector depends on foreign workers. However, security analysts say an insurgency is unlikely to gain the kind of traction it had in Iraq , mainly because Western states have no military presence in Libya. (Additional reporting by Samia Nakhoul in Beirut, Marie-Louise Gumuchian in Tripoli, Hadeel Al Shalchi in Tripoli, Sarah N. Lynch, Arshad Mohammed, Andrew Quinn, Matt Spetalnick, Steve Holland and Mark Hosenball in Washington, and Reuters reporters in Cairo and Benghazi; Writing by David Brunnstrom and Peter Millership) http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/12/us-libya-usa-attack-idUSBRE88B0EI20120912 Administration is engaged in a massive cover-up Benghazi explained: Interview with an "Intelligence Insider" - Doug Hagmann ( Bio and Archives ) Thursday, November 29, 2012 (47) Comments Print friendly Subscribe Email Us Benghazi, Libya CIA Station http://www.cryptocomb.org/Bengazi%20CIA%20Station.jpg Benghazi: Behind the scenes (Part II) This is part one of a multi-part interview with a government insider intimately familiar with the events that took place in Benghazi. In this part, he provides important background, and explains this administration is engaged in a massive cover-up. DH: It's been a while since we've discussed Benghazi. What have you heard lately? II: Before I answer that, I want to get a few things off my chest. Every politician, whether it's a congressman senator, diplomat, or their spokespeople and the media are lying to the American public every time they call the location of the attack a consulate. It was not. There was absolutely no diplomatic consulate in Benghazi. None. Words are important here. They can create a wrong image, an incorrect picture of what was really going on. The property where our Ambassador and other Americans were murdered was a rented villa consisting of a primary residence with a couple of outbuildings behind the actual house. The reason they're still calling it a consulate is to subtly divert any questions about our activities there. DH: Let's go over this again; exactly what was taking place at Benghazi? II: As I said, the place where the attack happened is one of the largest, one of the most active CIA operation centers in North Africa, if not in the entire Middle East. It was not a diplomatic station. It was a planning and operations center, a logistics hub for weapons and arms being funneled out of Libya. Unlike the embassy in Tripoli, there was limited security in Benghazi. Why? So the operation did not draw attention to what was going on there. DH: So in reality there were no actual security issues? II: Oh yes, there were, in Tripoli. Diplomatic cables show that. But it was for the embassy in Tripoli, the Ambassador and the diplomatic staff in general, not specifically for the Benghazi location for two reasons. First, the Benghazi location was a CIA operation, not a diplomatic one. Visible security at that location would draw unwanted attention there. They had to blend in. Remember, the villa was located in a somewhat residential area, sort of like the suburbs. Secondly, additional manpower was not needed there, at this CIA center, as the operation was already winding down. DH: I know you've gone over this before, but let's get into the specifics of the operation at Benghazi. II: Good, I want to be clear. After Gaddafi was taken out, there was the matter of his weapons and arms that were hidden all over Libya, including chemical weapons - gas weapons. According to Obama and Hillary Clinton, we were in Libya to collect and destroy these weapons to make for a 'safer' Libya. That's what they were telling the American public. That's not really what was going on, though, and it seems like all of the other nations except the average American knew it. Anyway, you can find pictures and videos of weapons caches being destroyed, but that is strictly for the public's consumption. What was really happening, before Gaddafi's body was even cold, is that we had people locating caches of weapons, separating the working from those that weren't, and making a big show of destroying the weapons, but only the weapons that were useless. The working weapons were being given to Islamic terrorists. They were being funneled through Libya, crisscrossing Libya on a Muslim Brotherhood managed strategic supply route. In fact, Michael Reagan called it the modern day equivalent of the Ho Chi Minh Trail in a recent article he wrote, and he is correct. The entire arms and weapons running operation was headquartered in Benghazi, The weapons were actually being shipped out of Libya from the port city of Dernah, located about a hundred miles east of Benghazi. That was the 'choke point' of the weapons being shipped out. Remember the Lusitania? Think in those terms, ships carrying weapons hid among 'humanitarian aid.' By the time of the attacks, an estimated 30-40 million pounds of arms were already transported out of Libya. From there, the weapons were being sent to staging areas in Turkey near the Syrian border, for use by the Free Syrian Army and other ragtag terrorist groups to fight against Assad. The objective was and still is to destabilize the Assad government. Why Syria, why not Iran? II: It's both, but Syria is the primary target here for this operation. First, look at the bigger picture, look at the so-called "Arab Spring." Who benefits and by default, who doesn't? Who is the architect for what's going on throughout the Middle East and North Africa? Whose agenda is being implemented? To specifically address Benghazi, though, look at the bigger picture here and what is trying to be accomplished. The Obama administration is playing the role of Saudi Arabia's private army. I think if Americans knew this, they would be outraged. Our service men and women are being sold out as mercenaries for the wants and desires of the Royal family, for the Saudi's interests. It's about religious dominance and oil. Who is really benefitting from, say, what's going on in Egypt? Mubarek is out, and the Muslim Brotherhood is in. Who does that benefit? Saudi Arabia. Look at what we see happening in Egypt. Destabilization. Do you think the Russians want that? Hell no. Syria is Russia's red line in the sand, as you earlier wrote. If Syria is lost to the Muslim Brotherhood by the actions of Obama, Hillary Clinton and others in this administration, what happens? Well, it will have an adverse impact on Russia from a military standpoint. They will likely lose access to their Mediterranean deep water port in Syria, which is Tartus. But think further - three dimensionally. Russia is still the world's largest oil producer, and that's Russia's primary source of income. Then there's Turkey, adjacent to Syria. A large amount of Russian oil and gas, consumed by the West, flows through Turkey, which is also a player in this operation. So, the destabilization of Syria which is exactly what Obama and Clinton are trying to do, presents a direct military and economic threat to Russia. Assad at least has kept things in check in Syria. Can you imagine Assad being replaced by someone like Morsi? That would strike at the very heart of Russia's economic health and military capabilities. Think of what's at stake here. Do Americans want a regional war? World War III? Has Obama or Clinton asked the American people if this is what they want? Make no mistake, we are doing the bidding for Saudi Arabia. The U.S., NATO and other allies are engaged in a proxy war with Iran and Russia. What about Assad's war crimes? Assad is no angel, but don't be fooled by the death toll attributed to him. Now this is important. Remember the first Gulf War? In the run up to Desert Storm, a young woman testified before the Human Rights Caucus - she only testified under her first name, which was Nayirah. Remember that she testified that Iraqi soldiers were taking infants from incubators in Kuwait, leaving them to die? Her testimony was supposedly confirmed by Amnesty International. Her testimony went viral, and every war hawk in the U.S. government cited her testimony, saying we needed to right the wrongs, the inhumanity. It was all one big lie! After Desert Storm, it was revealed that Nayirah's last name was Al-Sabah, and she was the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the United States. Her testimony was part of a publicity campaign organized by Citizens for a Free Kuwait, which was run by Hill & Knowlton, a PR firm out of New York. People must learn the back story. So we see a body count attributed to Assad. Who's doing the killing, Assad's people? Maybe at times, but the Free Syrian Army and other groups are doing most of the slaughter. It's one huge 'false flag' operation and the media is selling it hard. And Americans are buying it, just like the testimony of the girl from Kuwait. It's one big lie being told by Obama, Clinton, Rice, and others. Many Americans are buying the lie, and the media is selling the lie. The people behind this are laughing at us. Don't you get it? They're laughing at us. And do you want to know what's at stake? Four Americans were killed in Benghazi. Forty thousand have been killed so far in Syria. Tens of thousands of Syrian people have become refugees. Why? For what? To advance the agenda of Saudi Arabia. For oil. You know, the so-called right wing establishment were all up in arms about Obama's submissive bow to the Saudi King. Where are they now? Where's the outrage that the body count will be much greater than Forty thousand? It is anticipated that if the Obama plan succeeds, not only will America be committed to yet another war, but the body count could be as high as FOUR MILLION . Christians, among others, will be slaughtered. This could trigger a third world war, it's that serious. What are Russia and Iran doing? Certainly, they must be fighting back. Benghazi was a strike against us, the Obama-Clinton agenda. A visible strike, and I'll explain more about this shortly, because there are events I will point out that will put it all into perspective. But think of it this way. How did we successfully collapse the Soviet Union? I mean, what was the last straw? We attacked their currency - the Ruble. They're still stinging from that, and Putin was in the KGB at the time. Do you think he forgot about that? So, how do, or will Russia and Iran strike back if Obama and Clinton continue this insanity? Militarily? Possibly in regional conflicts, but to take us out, to stop us, what is the one area where we are very vulnerable? It's our economy - our dollar. What's our dollar tied to? Not gold or silver anymore, and some say it's not tied to anything. Well, that's not quite correct. It's tied to OIL. The free-flow of oil. Oil transactions everywhere in the world, including Russia and China, are made with U.S. dollars. We buy their oil with our dollars, and they return with those same paper dollars and employ Americans by buying our goods and services. As Michael Reagan wrote : " his system is also crucial to the security of our diplomatic and legal infrastructure, which is ultimately backed by our military. It's the core of our foreign policy." He also wrote that "any attack on the free flow of oil is an attack on the dollar. Any attack on the dollar is an attack on our ability to project power and protect Western democracies, economies, and ideals. God have mercy on us all if that attack is successful!" Tomorrow Part II Copyright (c) Douglas Hagmann Douglas J. Hagmann and his son, Joe Hagmann host The Hagmann & Hagmann Report , a live Internet radio program broadcast each weeknight from 8:00-10:00 p.m. ET. Douglas Hagmann, founder & director of the Northeast Intelligence Network , and a multi-state licensed private investigative agency. Doug began using his investigative skills and training to fight terrorism and increase public awareness through his website. Doug can be reached at: director@homelandsecurityus.com Older articles by Doug Hagmann http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/51346 Obama does not want the American people to know the truth about what is going on, Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, AQIM Benghazi: Behind the scenes (Part II) - Doug Hagmann ( Bio and Archives ) Friday, November 30, 2012 (44) Comments Print friendly Subscribe Email Us Author's note: This is part two of a multi-part interview with a government insider intimately familiar with the events that took place in Benghazi. It is important to note that the information contained in this series was developed from interviews that spanned over 100 hours. In this part, the insider provides information about the events of the attack and the continuation of the cover-up at the highest levels of our government. ( For Part I, please click here ). We've heard different accounts and different timelines concerning the attack at Benghazi. What exactly happened? First, people must understand that the compound that was attacked was situated in a somewhat rural area and was not a consulate, but a rented villa, or a residential structure. The residence was the primary building, and what has been referred to as the annex was located about 1800 feet away as the crow flies, but just over a mile to travel by road. And again, visible security was not present as the compound was the headquarters for a covert operation. No one wanted to draw attention to what was taking place at this location. The first indications of problems there began at least twelve-(12) hours before the first shot was even fired. One of the men at the compound observed a policeman or Libyan security officer taking photographs outside of the villa. Keep in mind that Ambassador Stevens, the point man in this Obama-sanctioned weapons running operation, was hastily scheduled to meet with the Turkish consul general at this location. The meeting was deliberately planned for dinner tie, toward evening, when the events that happened next could be performed under the cover of darkness. It's also important to consider the location of this meeting. Tripoli is the seat of power in Libya, and a genuine diplomatic meeting could more safely have been conducted there, at the embassy. Also, what most people don't know is that Libya is split, much like East and West Germany before the wall. The eastern part is more closely aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood, the same group that controls Egypt. The Turkish consul general had to meet there, not just with Stevens but with other factions involved in this covert operation. Now I'll digress for a moment. It is reasonable to ask whether the Turkish consul general was setting Stevens up for a hit, like a classic mob-style hit. First, there is no dispute that there was surveillance done at 6:30 a.m. and intermittently throughout the day. Next, consider that three hours before the first shot was fired, about 6:30 p.m. local time, some strange things were observed taking place near the compound. Military type vehicles began closing of the streets with trucks that had 50 caliber guns mounted on them. Checkpoints on the streets and at intersections were being quietly closed off around the compound. Nearby residents began going inside their homes. Anyone walking in the area got off the streets, like a scene from a movie in the Godfather series. It was obvious that the stage was being set for a strike against the compound. This alone reveals preplanning and coordination. It's also noteworthy to point out that the Turkish counsel general most likely passed through one or more of these checkpoints, or at least would have noticed that things were not right in the area. You must remember that just as Stevens was previously CIA working under diplomatic cover, the Turkish counsel general was his counterpart. It's typical spy-versus-spy stuff. Also consider this. One of the men stationed at the compound, a British national, left the compound at about 9:20 p.m., reportedly to get more phone cards. That's right, phone cards, like you would buy at Walmart. Why? Because the men at the compound ran out of minutes. Just who do you think they were talking to that day to burn through the minutes, and why do you think they needed them at that exact time? They were using the phones as a last and perhaps only line of communications to provide assessments of the strange things going on earlier. They knew that something was being planned and they were conveying that information - their observations to those who could assist them, in Tripoli and DC. Based on these activities, it is clear that the men at the compound suspected that they were in trouble long before the first shot was ever fired. They were calling anyone who would listen, or who should have listened. We knew trouble was brewing and no one responded in any meaningful way. Could the man who left to buy more phone cards have known what was about to take place? Well, it's possible, but there is no indication of that. Was the Turkish counsel general in on this, to set Stevens up? Well, what have we heard from our government? Has anyone even bothered to interview him? What did he say? Don't forget, this administration decided to handle this attack as a crime and not a terrorist attack. How long did it take for the FBI to be able to access the 'crime scene' after the attack? More importantly, what was left at the 'crime scene' to examine by the FBI due to this delay? Do you think the delay was accidental? Do you know what was discussed, or the reason for the meeting between Stevens and the Turkish consul general? Yes, I know some key points. First, keep in mind what this arms running operation was all about. It was to topple Assad and replace him with a Muslim Brotherhood leader. It was to destabilize Syria to advance the agenda of Saudi Arabia. They were using U.S. and NATO forces to do exactly that. However, Assad is no Gaddafi, and there is no comparison between Assad's army and the Libyan army. It would take much more than rebels inside Syria to topple Assad. There is no way on earth that the Syrian rebels, or Free Syrian Army, has the capability to accomplish this objective alone. It required U.S. assistance, arms and training. Now, Turkey is a NATO ally. They were assisting the Obama-Clinton-Saudi plan to funnel weapons ultimately to Syria, but the primary staging areas for these weapons were in Turkey near the Syrian border. Visual surveillance by Russia, using satellites and other means amassed photographic documentation of the U.S. assisting the 'anti-Assad rebels' inside Turkey. They developed evidence of the U.S. training these rebels and assisting them into Syria to fight against Assad. Think about this. What if surveillance images observed anti-Assad rebels being trained to handle and mount chemical weapons - gas shells - onto rockets? The process would be apparent and would obviously be detected by a number of visual indicators. Obviously, Syria wanted this to stop. By extension, so did Russia. One aspect of the weapons plan was to set up a false flag operation to make it appear that Assad used chemical weapons against his own people. Imagine the outcry from the civilized world to the news that Assad 'gassed' his own people. That would be an invitation to NATO and the West to openly intervene. Don't forget about the timing of all of this. Two months before the elections, and time was running out. The job of taking out Assad was not yet complete. Such an event would quickly advance this agenda. By this time, however, being caught and placed in a rather unenviable position between Russia and the U.S., the Turkish consul general was in a 'CYA, clean-up' mode, assuring that none of the chemical weapons that might have still been in Libya were headed for Turkey. It is also important to understand that the covert weapons running operation was just about finished. An estimated 40 million pounds of weapons were already shipped from Libya, and things were winding down. There was another issue as well, a very important and telling one. Seven members of the Iranian Red Crescent had been kidnapped or snatched from the streets of Benghazi on or about July 31, 2012. Again you must understand that virtually anyone walking on the streets of Benghazi not indigenous to the area are spies. Covert operatives, operating under various covers. From all nations. Along with the message that the weapons running operation was compromised, the Iranians had good reason to suspect that the 'Red Crescent workers' were snatched by the CIA or with their assistance. Iran wanted them back. They were spies, and countries want their spies back! So part of the meeting was to address this, as there was pressure by Russia against a wavering Turkey to switch sides. Anyway, you'll see how this ties in to the way the actual attack was executed. Please continue. So at 9:30 pm local time, the compound began to take on small arms fire. Based on all reports I've reviewed, there were three twelve-man attack teams armed with small arms, RPGs, and other sophisticated military style weapons. These were not run-of-the-mill street weapons, but military issued type weapons. The types of weapons alone scream that this was a preplanned attack. Eyes on the area confirmed that two of these teams surrounded the villa and the annex. The third team was elsewhere, lying in wait. The two teams began their assault on the compound where Stevens was inside about an hour after the Turkish counsel general left. Remember, he had to pass the checkpoints after the meeting. Just keep that in mind. Anyway, we all know now that there was an intense firefight that lasted nearly nine hours during which four Americans, Ambassador Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Dougherty and Tyrone Woods were killed. And of course that attack was not over a video and there were no protests before the attack. Now there are questions that are not being asked. The two well-armed 'hit teams' had the capability to reduce the compound and annex to rubble quickly. Why a protracted firefight? There are a couple of reasons. First, what was the makeup of the 'hit teams,' or who were the attackers? We have verified that the attackers were a combination of members of Ansar al Sharia and Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), but they were operating under the flag of Ansar al Sharia. Who is Ansar al Sharia? Iranian terrorists. They are a terrorist group that receives their training by and funding from Iran . Now think about this. Carefully consider the implications here. IRAN. It's the elephant in the room no one wants to mention or talk about. The attack on our ambassador and our people - Americans - was an attack by Iran. It was an attack at a nation-state level. AQIM also assisted. They are indigenous to Africa and are extremely dangerous. AQIM is a very 'elite' and extremely well-funded group, and very limited in number. Our last assessment suggests that there are only 400 or so members, but they are very influential across Africa and into South and Central America and Western Europe. Their importance and relevance will become evident shortly. The reason that they did not just take out the compound and everything and everyone in it is that they were looking for their spies. Remember the Red Crescent workers? The Iranian spies? They suspected that they might be held at the annex. As such, they wanted to free them and did not want to risk killing them. Oh, and there were others 'missing' as well. AQIM members. These were terrorists involved in drug running operations from the Tri-border (TBA) areas of South America through North Africa and into Western Europe. By the way, this is the way they made their money. Drugs sell at higher profits in Western Europe than elsewhere, so there is money to be made. The problem is that some of them got caught-snatched up in Benghazi and northeastern Libya. Now regarding AQIM, this has a direct connection not only to South America, but also to Mexico and Mexican drug gangs. You think that what's going on in Libya is just 'over there,' and far away from the U.S. and has nothing to do with our safety and security? Think again, but more on this in a bit. There's also another reason. The hit teams fully expected rescue teams from the U.S. to be dispatched to the compound. Certainly, calls for help went out. By waiting for the back-up or rescue forces, a surprise assault by the other 'hit team' team would have exposed our forces to possible causalities and turned the event into a much bigger event where the actual nature of the operation could be exposed to the world. Instead of being a cover-up for which they have yet to be held accountable, it would have been an international incident that would have exposed the entire affair. So the Ansar al Sharia attack groups deliberately conducted a protracted assault on the compound. Just imagine, our men and even the bad guys never expected team Obama would leave our people twisting in the wind, fighting for their lives. That alone should speak volumes to every American. As daylight approached, they had to wrap things up so they could disappear under the cover of darkness. Oh, and the crowds that are often cited by this administration, did form in the area as the attack progressed, much like a growing mob in riot. They provided the fog, or the cover, that permitted the attackers to escape amid the crowd. You mentioned the missing Iranian Red Crescent workers and members of AQIM. Were they ever released or found? Yes, and this is an extremely important part of this entire story. This reaches into the highest levels of our government. This is so very important that it must be addressed separately. So the attack was first and the crowd came later. I noted that the administration said that there were protests going on at the Embassy in Cairo at the same time and they compared it to Benghazi. Yes, that's their cover story and they know that there is absolutely no comparison. This is one huge lie that is easily addressed and put out of its misery. How soon did U.S. intelligence officials know who was responsible for the attack? Almost immediately, if not concurrent with the attack. Every part of that area is under active aerial surveillance by the U.S. There was SIGINT or communication intercepts at the time of the attack. Then, there was even an admission by the attackers. Obama knew. Hillary knew. Clapper knew. Everyone knew, expect the American people. And you know what? The American media knew as well. I heard a statement that they did not admit knowledge to avoid alerting the perpetrators. Yes, it was said that Rice and others did not want to alert the 'bad guys' or tip their hand or some such nonsense, but did that mean that Susan Rice, for example, had to appear on national television and lie to every one of us, to the country? In my opinion, Rice took on the temporary job of propaganda minister for a day in exchange for a shot at Secretary of State in the future. You are painting quite a dire picture. It gets worse, much worse, and it involves real threats across the globe and even to us here in the United States. But it's all because of our actions, the covert weapons running from Libya to Syria by way of Turkey at the direction of Barack Obama and his Saudi 'handlers.' FORTY THOUSAND men, women and children are dead in Syria as a direct result of this attempt at nation building, or tearing down Assad. There are four dead Americans. We are arming some of the very people who are killing our troops. Not only are we on the wrong side of this, we are actively pushing the world to the precipice of World War III. We are engaged in a real war here with Iran and Syria and by extension, with Russia and China. And we are being lied to about it every step of the way. And the lies are getting worse, but so are the attempts to stop the truth from getting out. What do you mean? What do you think the recent directive issued by Obama, the one you wrote about ' insider threats ,' is all about? Obama does not want the American people to know the truth about what is going on. He's doubled down to stop leaks, like this. But you know what? He just might be too late, because we're not done here. I'm not done talking, and there's much more that needs to be exposed. Copyright (c) Douglas Hagmann Douglas J. Hagmann and his son, Joe Hagmann host The Hagmann & Hagmann Report , a live Internet radio program broadcast each weeknight from 8:00-10:00 p.m. ET. Douglas Hagmann, founder & director of the Northeast Intelligence Network , and a multi-state licensed private investigative agency. Doug began using his investigative skills and training to fight terrorism and increase public awareness through his website. Doug can be reached at: director@homelandsecurityus.com Older articles by Doug Hagmann http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/51400 Advancing the agenda of Saudi Arabia, the Muslim Brotherhood in North Africa, Middle East. We're doing their work, pitting ourselves against Syria, Iran and ultimately Russia and China Benghazi explained: Interview with an "Intelligence Insider" (Part III) - Doug Hagmann ( Bio and Archives ) Wednesday, December 12, 2012 (28) Comments Print friendly Subscribe Email Us Author's note: This is part three of a multi-part interview with a government insider intimately familiar with the events that took place in Benghazi. As previously stated, the information contained in this series was developed from interviews that spanned over 100 hours. Included in this update is the most current information following a more recent interview with this insider. (Click here for Part I and Part II ). Events seem to be changing rapidly in Syria, and we know that the operations in Benghazi played a very important role in Syria. Please update the readers on the current situation, but first give a brief recap for context. Okay, but we're running out of time. The world is running out of time. Remember when we first began this lengthy interview process? It was in response to your report on September 15, 2012, just four days after the attack in Libya. You wrote that the fuse for WW III has been lit. It is now burning rapidly down, although people are still not understanding what's taking place right in front of them. I'll give a brief, perhaps somewhat oversimplified recap going back to the beginning, giving context for what's taking place at this very moment. I suppose I cannot overstate this or say this enough. The so-called "Arab Spring" is an initiative by Obama and his foreign policy advisers, Clinton, in her capacity of Secretary of State, and others including some of the most powerful people in the world. International bankers, the power brokers and string pullers. It is a plan to reshape the Middle East and North Africa, and change the geopolitical balance of power. It's not about some feel-good mission to free the oppressed. Never was. It's about the U.S., through the CIA, using groups ideologically aligned to al Qaeda aligned to overthrow various Middle East nations to install regimes controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood It's a globalist agenda, using the blueprints and agenda created by Saudi Arabia for the North African and Middle East portions of the globe, to shape that area geopolitically. They are using the United States as their surrogate and their military muscle, and the Obama led U.S. "regime" is all too willing to comply. With regard to Libya, it was in March of 2011 when the Clinton State Department, under orders of Obama, appointed Ambassador Stevens as the point man to the al Qaeda linked Libyan opposition forces to topple Qaddafi. Remember, Osama bin Laden was reportedly killed two months later and al Qaeda was supposedly out of existence, according to Obama. But think about this. Under direct orders of Obama, Clinton appointed Stevens to work with the very same people who reportedly killed 3000-plus Americans on September 11, 2001 for the purposes of overthrowing Qaddafi. It worked, and Qaddafi was deposed and murdered in October of 2011. Look at what happened next. Clinton announced that the U.S. was throwing $40 million into Libya to "secure" Qaddafi's weapon arsenals. Oh, really? That's what was being told to the public and to congress, but it's not reality, certainly not from the inside. As I've already explained , that money and our personnel were being used to collect the weapons to send them to Syria to topple Assad. Before getting to Syria, they were placed in staging areas in Turkey near the Syrian border, and other places, including Jordan. They were being collected and sent through northern Libya, and the CIA operations center was the headquarters for this operation. As I've said many times, there was no embassy or consulate in Benghazi. It was a covert CIA operations center. Wait, why do people continue to call it a consulate? Why is it identified on Google maps as a consulate. First, it continues to be called a consulate because this is part of the cover-up. The government is STILL lying to the American people. The media is assisting in the cover-up, and so are some in congress in both parties. For goodness sakes, anyone looking at Google maps on September 10, 2012 will never find the Benghazi location named a consulate. It's a LIE! Sorry, please go on. So every American understands, it is OUR tax money in part that was used to arm Islamic groups ideologically aligned with al Qaeda. Imagine that. Eleven years after 9/11, we're funding and assisting the very same terrorists who attacked our country to topple another country. And other countries are in this up to their necks as well. The Brits for one. The very country or empire that created some of the post-war borders, many knowingly unmanageable from the outset, is now in part responsible for changing them. Anyway, the weapons everyone in government said that were "collected" and destroyed were pieces of junk that never worked. The working weapons, including an estimated 10-15,000 shoulder fired missiles were shipped out of Libya. Stevens was the head of logistics, coordinating this operation. He was working with the Turkish consul general as well, the guy who met with him on the night of his death. We already went over this in detail. The attack was perpetuated by Ansar al-Shariah, an Islamic terrorist group backed by Iran. Also present were members of the terror group AQIM, or al Qaeda in Northern Africa. It was a coordinated attack for a purpose, and never, ever had anythig remotely to do with any internet video. Please touch on the nature of the attack again for those just catching up As I explained before , I have information that three "hit teams" were dispatched to Benghazi . Stevens was lured to the CIA compound to talk about Russia's knowledge of what the U.S. was doing - running weapons to be used against Assad in Syria, which is Russia's "red line." They needed to talk and not at the embassy, but at this out of the way location. The weapons running operation, although it was winding down anyway, was compromised. Over. Done. It is likely that the Turkish consul general told Sevens that the Russians had evidence - proof, of weapons in Turkey, including chemical weapons. Turkey, a NATO ally being squeezed by Russia, wanted the weapons gone from their turf. We also had people up there training the "rebels" on how to use the weapons as well. You heard about training exercises in that area on or about September 11, 2012? Who do you think we were training? Right after the Turkish counsel general left, the attack against the CIA compound began. What was the reason for the attack? Remember the story of the Iranian Red Crescent workers being "snatched" from the streets of Benghazi late on July 31 or the early morning of August 1, 2012? This happened at the same time the CIA compound wall was hit by a mortar. These Red Crescent workers were spies. At the same time, some members of the terror group AQIM were also picked up in Benghazi. It was a mystery! Where did they go? Who had them? The belief was that they were being held at the CIA compound. Iran wanted them back. So, in addition to everything else, Ansar al Shariah was looking for their people. AQIM were looking for their people too. This is the reason the compound was not immediately leveled by the weapons they had on sight. They were trying to find and free their people, who were not being held there, but elsewhere. They were trying to 'smoke" the people out of the compound and rescue the "hostages." Plus, a message had to be sent to Obama, Clinton and others that the weapons operation had to stop. The groups leading the attack, primarily Ansar al Sharia with an AQIM presence as well, were tools of Iran, Syria and of course, Russia. So there were two reasons for the attack: get their spies back, and expose this operation for what it was. Again, we went over this. The snatched Red Crescent Workers play prominently into exposing this operation. Yes, and here is where it gets interesting. They were released exactly 65 days after they were snatched . They were in good health and dropped off on the streets of Tripoli. But why then? This is where it get's damning to Obama, Clinton, and Valerie Jarrett. What is not widely known to Americans is that Obama sent Iranian born Valerie Jarrett to Qatar for high level talks with the Iranians about coming to an agreement before the November elections. This, despite Jarrett not having the capacity as official of the U.S. government. She had no business doing what she was doing. That aside, the plan was that Jarrett would broker a deal, and Obama would announce to the world that he had succeeded in diplomatic negotiations with the Iranians where they would halt their nuclear weapons ambitions and Obama would officially live up to his title as savior of the world. But before the talks kicked into high gear, the Iranians told Jarrett that the Red Crescent workers had to be released before any talks could be done in earnest. Jarrett relayed that to Obama and Clinton, and then, out of nowhere, the missing workers were suddenly released. If there were talks and the "spies" were released, then why was there no agreement? Because Jarrett, Obama and Clinton were being played by the Iranians. It was to buy time, especially since the Obama agenda of arming the anti-Assad rebels was continuing. The Iranians are not stupid. They understood that Obama and Clinton were continuing to support the anti-Assad rebels, and with bipartisan support, STILL ARE! So now we are hearing reports of chemical weapons planned for use by Assad. What's the real story? The world is being set up for a false flag operation. Obama, Clinton and every supporter of the anti-Assad initiative are either lying to the American people or are "dupes." The objective remains taking out Assad and replacing him with a Muslim Brotherhood-backed regime. There have been reports out of the U.S. and the UK that Assad is preparing to use chemical weapons against the rebels. Assad denies that he would ever use them, and there is a reason we should believe him in this case. The condemnation that would result is unnecessary and certainly unwarranted. There reports are to condition people to immediately suspect Assad when a chemical incident occurs. In this case, it's the U.S., the UK and other Western backed countries constantly asserting that Assad will launch a chemical attack, and we're getting ready just for that case. But if you look at the evidence, it's the anti-Assad, Western backed forces that have taken possession of chemical storage areas. There was a recently released video, very graphic in nature of anti-Assad rebels conducting the test of a nerve agent on two rabbits. The video displayed chemicals bottles with the name of a Turkish country on them. I'm not going to give the name or video channel, but people can find the video for themselves on YouTube. It's a set-up to topple Assad and put a Muslim brotherhood leader in his place. I told you before, and you printed what I said, that a chemical weapon attack would justify U.S. and NATO intervention, supported by the outcry of the world against Assad. It's Iraq all over again, except Syria is a hundred times more dangerous. Unlike Iraq, Afghanistan or even Libya, Syria will not implode. It will EXPLODE, and we will be fighting Iranians as well. Russia has "advisers" in Syria as well. Are the American people ready and willing to square off against Iran AND Russia in a regional conflict that will likely turn into a global, full scale war? What's going on with Turkey, Syria and Russia now? It was announced that Turkey will receive patriot Missiles to protect them from the spillover. Actually, these missiles over the northern territory of Syria will create a de-facto no fly zone that will allow the consolidation of anti-Assad rebels to perhaps install a new Western-backed government in the northern part of Syria . Well, Russia deployed Iskander missiles into Syria, rendering the Patriot missiles ineffective. This move shows exactly how serious Russia is. They are not backing down. And you know what else? Sunburn missiles are at Iran's disposal and can be used in that theater. Regardless of what is written or talked about by talking heads, these missiles poses a grave threat to our aircraft carriers. Want to see how fast we can lose an aircraft carrier and the several thousand crew members on board? This is what we face. Russia is doubling down, Iran is doubling down. Assad is doubling down. Meanwhile, Obama and the U.S. State Department continue to lie to the American people. The lie continues, and the fuse to WW III is burning down while the Obama regime is heading full steam ahead toward regional and global war. Why haven't we heard any truth about Benghazi, even from congressional investigators? Because the lie continues, and we are still supporting the overthrow of Assad, despite Putin's warnings. Obama, Clinton, the global leaders and their financiers are continuing to lead us into World War III. The lies continue, and to continue operations, the truth must be kept from the American public. We are continuing our operations to overthrow Assad at full throttle right in front of all Americans. And there will be fallout. In addition to four dead Americans and over 40 thousand dead Syrians, the consequences of our actions will cause the death of an estimated FOUR MILLION in Syria alone, many Christians. When, not if the "conflict" escalates, we'll see many millions dead. And for what? Okay, what's the objective here? Behind the smoke and mirrors is the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. It's their agenda. We're just providing the army, the training, performing the logistics and doing the heavy lifting. It's the Saudi agenda, and it's about power, control and oil. Who do you think controls the Muslim brotherhood? Has anyone asked why Obama, raised in a Muslim culture, is tied at the hip with the Muslim Brotherhood? Why aren't Americans angry that we are using our assets, our men and women to advance the agenda of Saudi Arabia under the orders of Barack Hussein Obama? Why are members of congress so quick to commit our forces to oust Assad when it benefits Saudi Arabia, not the U.S? The agenda of Obama is so overt, so "in your face" yet not one member of congress, not one media outlet is calling him out on this. Some might call this mere conspiracy theory. There's a conspiracy alright, but it involves the government and the media. They are laughing in our faces. In addition to the obvious regional consequences, there will be blowback from the Obama-Clinton agenda. What type of blowback? Well, let's first look at what's happened already as this insane Obama agenda has been going on for some time. Remember the plot to kill the Saudi ambassador to the U.S? On October 11, 2011, the FBI announced that a plot, identified by the FBI as "Operation Red Coalition," was foiled to kill Saudi ambassador Adel al-Jubeir in the United States. It was alleged that Iranian nationals were working with a Mexican drug gang to kill al-Jubeir with a bomb while he was dining at a DC restaurant. Do you think he would have been the only one to die there if that plan succeeded? No, innocent men, women and children would have died as well. Many in the media and the talking heads were having trouble understanding why Iran or Iranian nationals would want the Saudi Ambassador dead. Well, in the context of what you know now, does this make a bit more sense? These events do not happen in a vacuum. But I'm sure people will question why members of a Mexican drug cartel would be enlisted to assist in this operation? This gets a bit complex, but it goes back to AQIM. Remember them? That's al Qaeda in Northern Africa. They are an elite Muslim terror group of perhaps 400 or so members. They carefully screen their members, and do a lot of subcontracting. Despite being Muslim, they are running drugs from South America, specifically the Tri-Border Area (TBA) into North Africa for ultimate distribution into Europe. Why Europe instead of North America? Because the drugs are worth more there, and the profit difference is worth it. While drugs are being funneled from South America, terror groups are also funneling al Qaeda terrorists or terrorists of similar ideology into South America and into Mexico, where they are entering the United States. Think of it as a two-lane highway. Some of these terrorists have been caught at the southern border of the U.S., some with tattoos on their arms of mullahs and Islamic phrases of jihad. Why? Because when the Syria-Iran situation goes hot, there will be terrorists already inside the United States. But we created them and gave them the reason to be here. A few AQIM members, running the drugs east, were caught in Benghazi, which explains their presence and getting picked up there as well. So Ansar al Shariah and AQIM, both present at Benghazi, were looking for their people. But back to the blowback, or the consequences of the Obama foreign policy agenda. There is more, and it much more serious. Attacks in the U.S? For all intents and purposes, the United States, Russia and China are at war. Although the situation in Syria is being described as a civil war, it is the direct result of U.S. involvement by Obama and Clinton at the behest of Saudi Arabia. While real bullets are flying in Syria, an asymmetrical war exists beyond the confines of Syria's borders. Remember, Putin has drawn a hard line in the sand at Syria. The stability of Syria is of extreme strategic economic and military importance to Russia as well as China. Although no hot war exists between Russia, China and the U.S. at the moment, that does not mean things are not taking place behind the scenes in ways that are not readily apparent. One of the biggest threats to the United States right now is an attack on the U.S. Dollar. At this moment, the fate of the U.S. dollar hangs in the balance. What is the U.S. dollar backed by? Gold? Silver? Neither. Some say the dollar is not backed by anything, and although they might be technically accurate, it's not entirely true. At this moment, the dollar is backed by one important thing, which is oil. The stability of the dollar rests on the free and unimpeded flow of oil. Once that is interrupted or even threatened, there is a high degree of risk that the dollar will collapse. The "string pullers" are pulling us into a situation where our actions result in the disruption or the threat of disruption of the free flow of oil. Given the current state of our economy, how fast might this bring down the United States without a shot having to be fired? Now I know I'm stepping out into some areas that people might consider to be fringe, but think about what is taking place in the U.S. and across the globe. People talk about global governance, or a one order under a single currency. What's the quickest way to destroy a country from within? What was the major reason for the collapse of the Soviet Union? Remember the Ruble? I can tell you this, Putin does. So at this point, what's an expeditious way to strike at the very heart of America while also accomplishing other larger global objectives? Take out the U.S. dollar. We are in a period of heightened risk and maximum vulnerability, put here by Obama, his foreign policy advisers, czars, and of course Hillary Clinton. What are their objectives, and those of his closest advisers, especially in terms of the fate of the U.S? Fundamental change in ways that can be hardly imagined. Are you saying that the larger objective is to destroy America? I'm saying that we are advancing the agenda of Saudi Arabia and the Muslim Brotherhood in North Africa and the Middle East. We're doing their work, pitting ourselves against Syria, Iran and ultimately Russia and China. Syria and Iran are firewalls for Russia and China. Russia and China understand the monster created and used by the United States, they understand the Muslim Brotherhood backed terrorists. They will not stop at Syria. They will continue to push into the Federation of Russian States, disrupt oil flow, overthrow nations and threaten the security and sovereignty of Russia and threaten China. We're playing with fire, and to expect no consequences is ridiculous. The path that Obama continues to take, without any objection from congress or others in the U.S., will lead us on a path to self destruction. Perhaps the ultimate question is whether it is by incompetence or by design. Copyright (c) Douglas Hagmann Douglas J. Hagmann and his son, Joe Hagmann host The Hagmann & Hagmann Report , a live Internet radio program broadcast each weeknight from 8:00-10:00 p.m. ET. Douglas Hagmann, founder & director of the Northeast Intelligence Network , and a multi-state licensed private investigative agency. Doug began using his investigative skills and training to fight terrorism and increase public awareness through his website. Doug can be reached at: director@homelandsecurityus.com Older articles by Doug Hagmann http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/51679 Chaffetz: State Dept Hiding Benghazi Survivors by Kerry Picket 12 Dec 2012 667 post a comment Congressman Jason Chaffetz (R- UT) told Breitbart News on Wednesday that he has been "thwarted" by the State Department from seeing any Americans who survived the deadly attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi. Many people forget that there were Americans who survived the Benghazi attack, some of whom were badly injured and are still recovering. "My understanding is that we still have some people in the hospital. I'd like to visit with them and wish them nothing but the best but the State Department has seen it unfit for me to know who those people are-or even how many there are," Rep. Chaffetz said. "I don't know who they are. I don't know where they live. I don't know what state they're from. I don't even know how many there are. It doesn't seem right to me." "This is so patently different than any other experience I've had. Unfortunately, people have been killed and maimed and in harm's way in Afghanistan and Iraq and in points beyond. It's typically been the case that they would release those names but in this case, they won't. My challenge is to the media. You try and figure it out. They won't let Congress know. They won't seem to let the media know either." Breitbart News sent an inquiry to the State Department regarding those who survived the attack in Benghazi and is awaiting a response. http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/12/12/Chaffetz-Benghazi-State-Dept A Timeline of the Benghazi Attacks Reuters John Hudson 3,372 ViewsSep 21, 2012 While the deadly attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi has dominated headlines for more than a week, the facts of what actually happened during the Sept. 11 assault are still far from settled. A myriad of questions remain such as the identity of the attackers, the degree to which the assault was pre-planned and why security at the consulate was so insufficient, but new accounts bring us closer to how events unfolded that night and how U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other U.S. personnel were killed. To help sort it all out, this is a timeline of what we know so far about the attack, sequenced in Benghazi time. 8:00 to 9:30 p.m. This is the most disputed period of the evening. At 8 p.m., Ambassador Stevens finished a meeting with the Turkish consul general and, according to The Wall Street Journal , said he was "retiring for the night." What happened next has still not been established. Obama administration officials say that around 8 p.m.. a mob of Muslim protesters gathered around the U.S. consulate to protest the U.S. film Innocence of Muslims . Yesterday, however, CBS News reported that witnesses at the scene say there was never an anti-American protest outside the consulate. "That is in direct contradiction to the administration's account of the incident," said CBS correspondent Margaret Brennan. In today's paper, The New York Times also reported that witnesses say no anti-American protests occurred at the consulate: "Libyan witnesses, including two guards at the building, say the area around the compound was quiet until the attackers arrived." The map on the right shows a Google satellite image of the consulate. 9:30 p.m. The attackers arrive, approaching the consulate from three sides, armed with rocket-propelled grenades. According to The Journal , the militants breached the front and east walls around the building, and Americans began firing from inside. The Times says 20 Americans are inside at this time. The building was not heavily guarded and at no point were Marines involved in the fighting, despite initial reports. 9:35 to 10:30 p.m. The consulate alarm goes off and Libyan guards call for backup as militants gain access to the compound. "They fire rocket-propelled grenades into the main building. Mr. Stevens, Sean Smith and an American security officer are inside," reports The Times . "The security officer makes it outside. He returns to rescue the others and finds Mr. Smith dead but does not find Mr. Stevens." At 10 p.m., the consulate is burning in flames and, according to the Journal, the security officer was joined by Libyan government reinforcements who just arrived. "They guard front and rear gates as militants begin to crowd at rear gate. U.S. and Libyan guards enter burning building." The guards were also unable to find Ambassador Stevens. 10:45 p.m. At this point, American security personnel try to take back the main building of the consulate but fail. According to The Times they retreat to another compound about a half-mile away traveling in "two cars" according to The Journal. 12:30 a.m. Looters descend on the consulate and pull the ambassador out of the building. According to The Times , these same Libyans were responsible for bringing Stevens to the hospital. Video footage of Stevens being dragged out of the compound later surfaced online (most notably, the Drudge Report), with images of Libyans cheering and praising Allah. 1:00 a.m. A half hour later, Stevens arrives at Benghazi Medical Center and is described as "unresponsive," according to the Journal . The Times says "The doctor who treats him says he may have died from smoke inhalation. Americans are unaware of his whereabouts at this point." The map to the right shows the route from the consulate to the Benghazi Medical Center (5.1 kilometers by car.) 1:30 a.m. Enter the reinforcements: "An American rescue team arrives from Tripoli at Benghazi's airport and drives to the second compound," reports the Times . 2 a.m. This is where phase two of the attack is reported to have begun and where evidence emerges, according to some observers, that the attack was pre-planned and coordinated. "As the staff is preparing to leave the second compound, it comes under fire. More than 20 staff members retreat to a building at the back of the compound," reports the Times . Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty, both American security officers, were killed in the shootout. Describing the confrontation, the Times says "The attackers had lain in wait, silently observing as the rescuers, including eight State Department civilians who had just landed at the airport in Benghazi, arrived in large convoys. This second attack was shorter in duration than the first, but more complex and sophisticated. It was an ambush." 3 to 4 a.m. Ambassador Stevens' body is found at the Benghazi hospital by Libyan security forces. After his colleague's describe his features, Libyans identify the body. 6:30 a.m. Time to leave. The U.S. survivors are flown to Tripoli. Shortly afterwards, the bodies of the murdered Americans are flown out of Benghazi as well. Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments or send an email to the author at jhudson@theatlantic.com. You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire. John Hudson Topics: Afghanistan , Libya http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2012/09/timeline-benghazi-attacks/57124/ WHITE HOUSE INSIDER: "Barack Obama - The Butcher of Benghazi." by Ulsterman on September 20, 2012 with 102 Comments in News "But they are so spooked and confused over the polling data, they released it sooner. That means the Middle East situation has them afraid. People are actually asking some questions now. Sniffing around the situation just a bit. And if they get somebody in the military...somebody like that...to go on the record with this...with whatever had that ambassador acting so strangely right before he was killed...well-well-well..." -WHI NOTE: Readers should know - Insider has been extremely busy of late, and to be given even just a bit of time to sit down face to face again after months of being unable to do so is both unexpected and a welcome privilege. -UM UM: You said I get two main topics to discuss, so let's start with Fast and Furious. Holder. Where are we at and where will it go? Gone in the fall. That's what you promised. Many times. WHI: Yes I did - and I also said...was it last time we talked...also said it's out of our hands now. They got what they need to push him out...they can do it if they're willin' to get just a little bloody. Don't know if they will though. Some of them...some of the Republicans are willin' - that I know. But they ain't leadership. They can move a committee vote on somethin'...but they can't bring it to the floor all by themselves. And then you got the Senate blocking everything...not the Senate. Reid. What they got or what they promised that old motherf-cker...nothing gettin' by him. Read more in News << Obama Flip-Flops On Middle East Embassy Attacks - Now Admits It WAS A Terrorist Attack Against America GUNNERGATE: Obama White House IGNORED Inspector General Gunrunning Investigation >> UM: So it's Boehner? He's blocking taking this to the next level? WHI: Sure...among others. I don't want put all the blame on Boehner...he's seeing how even if the House were to put something strong...hell...they already done good on some of that, right? Even pushing a legal challenge. But that takes a lot of time...and none of that will ever see the light of day until after the election. Might make for a brutal second term for Obama if he wins...but as for real justice? The truth? They are runnin' out the clock. And yeah - Republicans are dragging their feet too. Scared of a fight. A real fight. (Pause) Thing that's got me...well...more than a little pissed off about this is the real potential behind the DOJ investigation. You see, Fast and Furious...the gunrunning bullsh*t. It ties into a whole pile of no good around Obama and Jarrett...there's political stuff there of course. Gun control and all that. None of that has really come out like it should. I promised that memo...said there was a memo on the gun control thing, remember that? Nobody said nothing about it - and then it came out. And I thought "here we go - now it starts". Then nothin'. Media buried it. Deep. Congress hardly touched it. UM: You're talking about the memo stating how the border violence can be used to implement stronger gun regulations? WHI: That's the one - tied directly to Fast and Furious - laid out the real intent of all that gunrunning. They wanted things to get f-cked up. They wanted those drug lords killing off each other and if some poor innocent bastards get blown away in the crossfire, all the better, right? Make Americans...make enough of them, hate the idea of guns. Make them willing to give some of those guns back. Make them...the Dems would need just another 10% or so of the voters, maybe not even that much...and gun rights in America would be transformed forever. Be lucky to get a water gun out there after they done with it. And I ain't talking exaggerations here. The Democrats - ones who control the party now...taking guns away is right at the top of their priorities list. Way up there. UM: Why is that? WHI: It all comes back to control with these people. Soviet Union style control. Where you live. What you eat. What you read. How you work. They want to control all of that. 'Course they go on living however they like. Government becomes the elite class. And we ain't far off from that already. Obama, Jarrett...they want that so bad...they want to control the rest of us because...well we are all just too damn dumb to take care of ourselves, right? It's all for our good, right? UM: Back to Holder. Is he gone or does he stay? WHI: Out of our hands. Republicans have been given what they need. They just gotta get in the ring now and start swinging away. Hit something for f-ck's sake. HARD. UM: How about some of your Democrats help them to do that? WHI: I don't have any of "my Democrats". They are all dead and gone or sittin' back home wondering...same as I wonder...how in the hell it got so bad so fast. (Pause) Democratic Party is dead. Gone. We hung ourselves in 2008. Obama was the rope. Snapped our necks and gave us that sh-t for brains grin while he done it. UM: You helped with that rope in 2008. WHI: F-ck you - we all did. You don't...no need to remind me what I done. ...And if there was a Republican Party with just a little more balls...this thing woulda been wrapped up by now. Holder been gone and gone a long time ago. And back to Chicago with it. They got that - they know the deal there. Investigate that DOJ - investigate those wire taps. Investigate that prosecutor. The guys dyin'. Thing I told you about Vegas...how long ago? Here's the deal - it's all f-cking there. One by one by one...it's a hell of a mess but if they had the nuts to go after it...they could get it done. Media would have to take it on. (Pause) But I'm just an old has-been see? When bodies start showing up...courage leaves the room real fast. Nobody wants to risk anything on principle. Doin' the right thing is doin' the dead thing - that's what back to Chicago is in all of this. Fast and Furious...as bad as that is...that thing was just to get the ball rolling. Get Holder gone, peel away the DOJ onion...and see the real ugly inside. UM: So if Holder were to go...all of the rest - all that Back to Chicago scenario you have always been speaking to...it finally comes out? WHI: Used to think that...there would be a good month or so of chaos at DOJ...a window where people would be given the chance...and maybe find just enough courage to walk upright for once. You know? Man-the-f-ck UP. This thing got dragged out so long though...and Jarrett put West in there...he's hangin' real close to Holder now...sh-t, they probably got a real solid contingency in place by now. This thing took too f-cking long to get on. (Pause) Don't wanna think on that anymore - see what the Republicans do with it this week. F-ck 'em. All of 'em. Democrats. Republicans. It's all bullsh-t. Circle-jerkin' mother-f-ckers. Not a real man in the bunch these days. John f*cking Wayne has left the building man - and he slammed the door behind him. (Pause) Ah...godd-amit, I apologize son...said I wasn't gonna...know you don't like all the cursin'. Been a rough one. Past week. Got me feelin' so damn OLD. UM: How about the Middle East stuff? The embassy attacks? I have been trying to get out as much information on that as possible. Is that going to hurt Obama like it should? WHI: It will - it IS hurting him. Not as much as it should - media is in 24/7 protect mode. That whole things stinks...not just the president's reaction to it. Not just the lying by the administration...but the fella who was killed...that ambassador. Now this is me - this is just me thinkin' here. What my gut is tellin' me on this...that guy was no ambassador. Officially yeah - but off the books. He was CIA. Had to have been. You made a comment in one of your stories...'bout how it was like Fast and Furious except in the Middle East. Somethin' like that. UM: That if Obama was willing to arm Mexican drug lords, why not Muslim extremists. WHI: Right - somethin' like that. Think you might a nailed it there without knowing it. You meant it as...like a bit of sarcasm there at the end of what you wrote - but you actually said what the real deal is. Obama sent a sh-tload of weapons into Libya during the Gaddafi thing. Had no idea who they were going to...just...tens of millions of dollars worth of high grade weaponry. Now you think folks like al Qaeda and other militant groups won't notice? It was a take what you need weapons supermarket courtesy of the Obama government for them! Not much different than what happened in Egypt. UM: How so? WHI: You got Egypt. You got Libya. Both of them were run by...basically they guys running the show were non-practicing Muslims, right? Mubarak - he couldn't stand the Muslim hardliners and he beat the sh-t out of them every chance he got. Him and his military cronies. So he kept the peace that way. He kept business open to American and European interests. Things weren't perfect, but a hell of a lot better than say,Iran. He could tell Iran to shut the f-ck up, and Iran had to consider it because Egypt had some real muscle. It had a military, and it had the backing of the West. (Barack Obama shaking hands with former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak. A year later Obama would be calling for Mubarak's removal from power) Now Libya...Gadaffi was a real sh*t. Sick bastard. But like Mubarak - he didn't like the Muslim hardliners in Libya either. Especially if they were gonna cause trouble for him. So he would intimidate the sh-t out of them too. At least over the last decade or so. Gaddafi had two coming to God moments in his life. The first was when Reagan bombed the hell out of his palace. He knew he coulda died then. He knew the West could come in and take his life if it wanted. So he moderated. Then there was 9-11. And when Bush went into Iraq and did his thing - they found Hussein and put him on trial and hung the bastard...that scared the hell out of Gaddafi. Really got inside his head. So he moderated some more. He was actually...my understanding...he was actually becoming a regular contributor to our Intel. By that time he couldn't stand al Qaeda anymore than we could. Maybe less so because they posed an even more direct threat to him. And what happens? The dumbest pile of sh-t that has ever sat in that White House helps to force Mubarak and Gaddafi out - and we got no real plan for the aftermath. All kinds of people are telling the administration the Muslim Brotherhood could take overEgypt. Could take over Libya. They either ignored those warning or that is EXACTLY what they wanted to happen. They are warned that Gadaffi's departure will create more chaos in Libya and there are a sh-tload of weapons that will be unaccounted for. That is exactly what happens. Obama doesn't give a sh-t. Too busy golfing. Doing the talk shows. Right? Telling Israel to go f-ck themselves. Dancing around Iran instead of punching them right in their f-cking face. Jarrett is Iranian. Jarrett has long ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. You would think, maybe for one f-cking second, enough people in the media would think maybe - just maybe...we should take a closer look at all this. (Pause) What if that ambassador fella...what if he was killed by weapons sent there by Barack Obama? Just like you said in that off-handed way. And what if there are tens of thousands of those weapons being used by al Qaeda right now? Maybe on their way to the Israeli border? And not just guns 'cause that's not all we were sending into Libya you know. We're talking some high powered take down an airliner kinda stuff. And take it a bit further. We did that. And we did it knowingly. We did it willingly. The Obama White House. Their hand picked stooges in the military, in State. They did that. Now let me go one little step more here. What if that ambassador...well...let's say he came across certain information...damaging to the administration. Why is he flying into that consulate in Benghazi? Cover of night. No security precautions. Anti-Western sentiment reaching critical levels. It's almost like he was trying to keep his whereabouts unknown to his own government. Right? And that bullsh-t little YouTube video thing? It had been out for...what - months? Nobody gave a sh-t about it. NOBODY. But then it is being used as the spark to start the fire? Who did that? Who would want to get those sand...get those people are riled up like that? And the administration - they are saying it was that video right out of the gate, right? Like it was a packaged excuse ready to go. Packaged means it was part of something bigger. A bigger plan, right? UM: (Interrupts) Hold on - I apologize. I just want to ask you if this is all your own speculation - or if you received information. (Military Insider?) You're getting pretty specific here - and that usually - all the times we've done this...usually means you received information from another source. WHI: This is me. Just me. ...so like I said...the video thing...it's part of a packaged plan. They are running that excuse HARD. Libyans are saying it's bullsh-t. London media...they got a sh-tload of people in Libya too who know - there is stuff going on between us and the Brits...they ain't happy with Obama. Not all of them. So basically everyone BUT the Obama administration is saying the Benghazi attack was pre-planned, right? Terrorist attack. And what is Barack Obama doing right at that time? He's flying to Vegas. He's doing goofy interviews. His White House just keeps repeating the video excuse over and over again. So is this all just a pile of incompetent sh-t by the Obama administration? By Clinton? Did you notice how Defense said very little? And the CIA...Petraeus... has said nothing? In this town, some times the ones speaking the loudest are the ones not saying a word. UM: And then we get the "secret" Romney 47% video released. WHI: Right - right. Obama was starting to take on just a little bit of heat on the Middle East sh-t and that tape comes out. That thing wasn't meant to come out this early. Late October, maybe - certainly not now. But they are so spooked and confused over the polling data, they released it sooner. That means the Middle East situation has them afraid. People are actually asking some questions now. Sniffing around the situation just a bit. And if they get somebody in the military...somebody like that...to go on the record with this...with whatever had that ambassador acting so strangely right before he was killed...well-well-well... UM: So you're going conspiracy on this? WHI: Oh yeah. That was no accidental killing of the ambassador. And it wasn't just al-Qaeda acting alone. They had approval. From somebody linked with our side of the fence. UM: And you're really just speculating here? WHI: (Pause) ...Sure. Just me on this...just me thinking on Barack Obama - the Butcher of Benghazi. UM: That has a ring to it. WHI: The truth often does. UM: Even if we win this election...Obama is defeated. Is there still time to save this country? Or are we too far gone? WHI: You been talking to the Old Man? 'Cause that's EXACTLY how he put it to me a few days back. Too far gone. Somethin' about...he went on about muni bonds. How that Ponzi scheme...how he didn't think they could stop the collapse. I don't understand all that sh-t. (Pause) You haven't talked to him? UM: No - not recently. WHI: Well...he's...he told me so I don't think he'd mind you knowing. UM: Knowing what? WHI: He's...how'd he put it? Closing shop? Already has the family out you know. Like he said he would. Now he's getting ready...even with his health...he's considering going himself. Not sure how he'd manage his treatments... He's about as paranoid as I've ever seen him...and that goes back a while. UM: Why? Something...was there a specific event that got him so spooked? WHI: I don't wanna talk for him - shouldn't even be talking this much about him. (Pause) He said this though...he said...and maybe this is why he isn't including you. For some kind of protection. Doesn't want you involved. He seems determined about something. Not sure what he's got planned - but he's up to somethin'. ...Said people have forgotten that there is both a loving god and a righteous god and that it's gonna be a righteous god America is about to meet up with. UM: What do you think that's supposed to mean? WHI: Not sure. It means something - he don't talk to talk. But who knows? He's lookin' to meet up with God soon enough I suppose. UM: And he said that the situation is "too far gone" for America? WHI: That's how he put it. Word for word. That's why I thought you talked with him recently. UM: How about my question - what do YOU think? Is America too far gone? WHI: Hell son...I ain't never gonna give up on this old girl. Her and I...it's been a lifelong love affair. She's a tired and cranky b-tch...but so am I. Semper Fi motherf-cker. ...I don't quit. END INTERVIEW. ______________________ RELATED UPDATE - THANK YOU TO ULSTERMANREPORT.COM READER "WHISTLEBLOWER" : DOJ SILENCES OBAMA ASSOCIATE WITH HIS FREEDOM http://www.scribd.com/doc/116778493/The-Utter-Insanity-of-Obama-and-the-CIA-Starting-World-War-3-in-the-Middle-East-Must-Read-Documents

Los Angeles Nuclear Destruction Prophecies

Eternal Agony — Mon, 04 Mar 2013 18:59:39 -0500

Los Angeles Nuclear Destruction Prophecies 22But I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon at the day of judgment, than for you. 23And thou, Capernaum, which art exalted unto heaven, shalt be brought down to hell: for if the mighty works, which have been done in thee, had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day. 24But I say unto you, That it shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom in the day of judgment, than for thee. Holy Bible, Matthew 11:22-24 Los Angeles Destruction Prophecies given through Brian Charles "It all must go by My hand. Great will be her destruction! It is ordained forever!" --Los Angeles "I wanna destroy it-sunken beneath the sea." "It will all be gone." "It will all be blown to rubble-massive nuclear explosion!" "All this will be a memory." --Los Angeles "It'll be submerged beneath the sea." --Sunset Boulevard and all on it "All this richness must be washed away." --Beverly Hills "Suddenly plunged under the sea." "It'll be washed away." --Hollywood "It MUST go-its sin has risen before Me. Great will be its destruction." --Westwood Village, L.A. "It all must be blasted away!" "You see this place? (Westwood Village) It'll all be gone, blasted apart by My hand! These people won't serve Me. They love money. They must be destroyed. Thus says the Lord of Hosts." --Westwood Village "It must be blasted away in an instant! -They won't serve Me." "It must be gone by My hand." "Great will be her destruction." --UCLA "They must go-they won't serve Me." "-Nuclear destruction, blasted apart! Great is her greed. I have remembered every medical statement. It MUST be destroyed!" "Flee this place!" "It must be blasted away! It's a part of My plan! Great will be her nuclear destruction." --UCLA Medical Center "It must be blasted away!" "It's by My hand!" "All this must be gone, by My hand!" "It'll happen!" "Busses must be blasted away-everyone must go!" "Great is her destruction planned!" --Los Angeles "It'll all be swept away by the force of My hand! I'M sick of this wicked land. It must be swept away! Thus says the Lord of hosts." "The city will be destroyed because of them." "They're going to Hell. I have given them many chances to repent. I have said it." --L.A. filmmakers, movie industry "You know, I'M gonna destroy this place suddenly? Let Me do it- I control the nuclear buttons." --Los Angeles "You must go and warn." "You must go and warn My people." "This city will be sunken by My hand!" "It'll be judged by My hand." "It must be destroyed-its sin has risen before Me. You must warn. Thus says the Lord of Hosts." --Los Angeles "Nobody will serve Me. Nobody will do it My way. I must judge for that." "It must be destroyed. I'll judge 'em for that." "The peoples' wickedness-won't listen. They love weed. They'll be destroyed." "It's a reproach in My sight. They must be destroyed." --California marijuana smokers "I'll judge for that!" "I'll definitely judge for that!" --the world getting you hooked with the first one given to you for free "You know this'll be plunged underwater?" "It's about to happen." --Arroyo Grande, CA "I'll judge for both!" --business communities that form controlling 'old boy networks' to price gouge the public, and business communities full of infighting and competition "I'll judge for that!" "I'll definitely judge for that! "You can be sure of that!" "They'll be destroyed forever!" "A mighty nuclear destruction!"--places in Christians' lives where they said "No" to the Lord "Someday it'll blow furious!" "It's My judgment." "Lassen too." --Mount Shasta "It shall come down." --the big I-5 bridge over the reservoir, north of Redding "This will all be sunken." "It will all be submerged underwater." --the Central Valley "It'll be washed underwater." --Santa Cruz "It'll all be swept away." --California coastline "They'll be swept away." The big pine trees of Big Sur "It'll be collapsed." --the coast highway, route 1 "I'll judge all of that!" --squandering money on alcohol, drug abuse "I'll judge all of that!" --business ventures based on greed "Someday it will end. They'll have to use antigravity or bicycles." -- driving cars "I will judge all of that!" --the vileness of the left-wing world "I'll judge for that!" --independent women who want a meal ticket, not a husband "I'll judge for that!" --girls only wanting to be with rich guys "All this will be submerged underwater." --Long Beach rail yards "I will judge those who watch television, idol of the 21 st century." "I will judge them." "They will be destroyed." "I will punish My enemies in Hell forever." "They must be destroyed." --the people who love Satan "I'll judge 'em for that! --With a mighty nuclear destruction!" "They must be judged." --the Los Angeles Satanists, for controlling the media and entertainment "It won't always be." "I shall reclaim some, those that don't worship their bodies." --all the most beautiful women serving Satan "It'll be a reality." "It'll happen all over. Mighty will be the drought. Thus says the Lord." --children starving to death "Destroy My Israel." "The Jews won't obey. They must be destroyed. Thus says the Lord of Hosts." "They must be judged." "Send (judgment prophecies) to them." "I will judge them all! They must be destroyed. Thus says the Lord-I have said it." --the wicked Israelis and godless Jews "They must go-they won't obey. Thus says the Lord of Hosts." --The Israelis "They must be destroyed." "I know everything!" "They must be destroyed!" "They all must go. They refuse to obey." "They must be destroyed, all of them. Few will survive. I have said it- the Lord of Hosts, Mighty in Israel." --the wicked Israelis and godless Jews "I wanna destroy because of that!" --pornography "I don't like 'em." --Harley Davidson motorcycles "We would have healed Babylon, but she is not healed: forsake her, and let us go every one into his own country: for her judgment reacheth unto heaven, and is lifted up even to the skies." Jeremiah 51:9 "And thou, Capernaum , which art exalted unto heaven, shalt be brought down to hell: for if the mighty works, which have been done in thee, had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day." Matthew 11:23 Words of Prophetic Judgment Against Los Angeles California Given through Brian Charles "I'M gonna destroy that place with such mighty force that you won't believe it!" --LosAngeles "I must destroy this place. It's sin has risen before Me. It will be sudden. Flee!" --Los Angeles "This place will be destroyed suddenly. Millions will die." --Los Angeles "You MUST go! Flee the city of My wrath!" --Los Angeles "You like it because it is nice and sunny. Millions will die. It will all be submerged underwater." --Los Angeles "I'll destroy this place suddenly with My mighty hand. They won't obey Me." --L.A. andthe Los Angeles International Airport "The city must be destroyed. It won't obey Me, none of 'em will. See this place willbe destroyed suddenly." --Los Angeles "I'm gonna destroy this place suddenly. Few will survive. Millions will die. Repent!""I must judge this place. Its sin has come up before Me." "This city will be destroyed in a second. Great is My wrath against this place. It's people must repent orelse!" --Los Angeles "I must destroy this place. Its sin has risen before Me." --Los Angeles "All these buildings will be reduced to rubble." "Few will survive My wrath!" --downtown Los Angeles "This will all be destroyed in a second. Great is My wrath against this place." Los Angeles and the Los Angeles International Airport "Someday it'll be gone. It'll all be destroyed. It'll be destroyed by force someday.They'll be desolate (the highways). I'M gonna destroy it suddenly. Few will survive.It's sin has come before Me. I must destroy this place. It'll all be flattened bynuclear explosion. It'll all be wiped away. You'll see-a mighty nuclear explosion.The bombs are already in place. It all must go down." --Los Angeles "I'M gonna bring it all down." --highway overpasses, buildings "All this land will break off into the ocean." --California "California will be a thing of the past, swept into the sea." "Submerged under the sea." --Cajon Summit Mountains "I'M gonna destroy this place with a sudden blast!" --Claremont "Someday this will be a thing of the past, destroyed by My mighty hand." --Los Angeles International Airport "It'll all be submerged underwater. It all must go. Its sin has risen before Me. Yes, I MUST destroy this place. You MUST get out of here! --Los Angeles "That's what's gonna be. Nothing will be left remaining." "People are too selfish to serve Me here. All they want is the world. I must judge them for that-by nuclearfire!" --The Los Angeles megacity totally destroyed "I MUST destroy this place. It's sin has risen before Me. "It'll be crumbled beneath your feet. You'll see-a great nuclear disaster. See what they do? You must go." "Greatis My wrath against this place." --UCLA "All this will be submerged underwater." "Come down in a minute!" --UCLA, L.A. "All this will be submerged underwater." UCLA, Bel Air, Brentwood, Westwood Village, Los Angeles "It will all come down in an instant." --Westwood Gateway Towers "People are too selfish to serve Me here. All they want is the world. I must judge them for that-by nuclear fire!" "Nobody wants to obey Me." "They won't listen. They'llbe all gone." --the people of Los Angeles "I have waited for many to repent, for no avail." "Many will die, judgment will be great." "Someday this will all be underwater." --Los Angeles "They won't serve Me. They serve themselves." --the Jewish People "Great will be the death in the world, starting with My Church." "Few will serve Me My way." "They've all followed their own way and won't obey. I must judge for that. Amen" "My people shall be destroyed, for the sin of their mouths-they talk much but do nothing. They MUST be destroyed. Amen." "I will destroy them all." --God's people, theChurch and the Jewish people "I'll judge for that!" --people talking about problems but doing nothing "I will judge for that." "I expect 'em to help." --God's people saying 'I can't help you,'when they've been prospering materially and financially "Destroy My people with your prophetic word!" "Destroy My people. They won't do My will." "I'M gonna judge My Church because they won't obey Me." "I'M gonna judge My people!" "You'll see-eternal destruction! They won't obey!" "Destroy My people. They won't do anything about it (Planned Parenthood). They MUST be destroyed! That's how it will happensuddenly.Few will survive." "You must tell. You must send." "This land will be destroyed suddenly." "Great will be her destruction. Flee for your life, flee! You must go!" --Los Angeles & California "I will annihilate this race. Few will survive. Amen" --The American People "America will be destroyed by nuclear bombs, because My Church has forsaken Me!" "I must destroy this empire. You'll see it before your very eyes. Its sin has come before Me." "That's why I'M going to destroy the country-the people love lust." --The USA "This country will become an empty wasteland, full of cactus and tumbleweeds." "All this will be empty and waste, because My people don't do My will." --The United States of America "I'll judge for both." "I'll judge for both-a mighty nuclear blast!" --America being founded for the propagation of the Gospel-the work left undone, and to grow and ship tobacco back to England "You must go." "Few will survive." "You'll see-a great nuclear disaster! It must happen. Its sin has come before Me-those high mountains will be submerged under the sea." "Allthis place will be sunken." "It all must go under the sea." "You must get out of here! It'll be all gone!" "You must go!" --Los Angeles and California "Even in disaster I'll be with you." "I will create a new Church." "I'll have mercy on this place because you asked. The judgment will not come immediately." "The judgment will not come immediately. I'm giving time to repent." "I can blast it away. That's what I'll do." --The Ritz Carlton, downtown Los Angeles "I will judge for that!" --pastors who sacrifice Truth for numbers and money and popularity "Those days will return." --the days of having to ride horses to get out West "The Western deserts will flow with blood!" "I'll judge for that!" --women not wanting to depend on a man for their livelihood "I will judge for that." --people always looking for a better deal in life "I'll judge for that." --the racial segregation of the Church "I'll judge for that." --the bias in science against God and Truth in areas of research and study "It's all gonna go belly-up." --the economy "My Church has deserted Me. I must destroy them for that. By nuclear war. Thus says the Lord of Hosts. Amen" "And you, Capernaum, which are exalted unto heaven, shalt be brought down to hell: for if the mighty works, which have been done in you, had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day." Matthew 11:23 "Trust ye in the LORD forever: for in the LORD JEHOVAH is everlasting strength: For He brings down them that dwell on high; the lofty city, He lays it low; He lays it low, even to the ground; He brings it even to the dust. The foot shall tread it down, even the feet of the poor, and the steps of the needy." Isaiah 26:4-6 Prophecy Against Los Angeles As I drive, I see pictures of L.A., raised to the ground. I ask the Lord about the stands of trees. Will they not be left standing.? An occasional trunk may stand but without leaf. I see a devastated wasteland! an empty desert! I listen for the voices of the birds. Even the crows are silent ! Where the city stood and extended, nothing! Cause 1: Global Exportation of a Malevolent Culture God is against you, Los Angeles, city of pornography, city of oppression, home of rape and exploitation. You have beamed evil and malevolence, violence and bloodshed, family dislocation and lewdness, pornography and twisted sexuality across the face of the earth in bold defiance of your God, with your fists raised in challenge to his, saying stop us, God of love. His patience is exhausted. His voice to you has never been silent , from the first preachers on your fields and streets, from the great revivalists to your Jack Hayfords and Lloyd Ogilvies. Every week, your black preachers thunder against your sins, but you do not hear, Los Angeles, and when you do hear a fraction, you cry out that no-one can change these things, let them go on, let them go on... Cause 2: Global Symbol of Chic Greediness So excellent in business, so lazy in morals. Such is the greed that has consumed your very being and that of your citizens. Greed and chic. For you love the shows. You love the glitter. Tinseltown will be no more. Supermodels will perish with the lowly. Mansions will be raised just as surely as the hard won homes of the escaping migrant poor of East L.A. Oh, my people, says the Lord, how could you ignore me and bring such ruin on yourselves? How could you be so ignorant of my ways, not willing to fight for truth in the public office, and control of the pornographic machines of Hollywood ? How could you buy into the lie that the free market is good and godly and should never be interfered with, even when daily the evil seeps into your homes through a cable? How could the godly sit and do nothing effective for decades to destroy the core of Hollywood's evil ? Now it is time. It is too late to redeem or convert these structures. It is too late! Cause 3: City of Incest It is too late to salvage your honor, so many raped, sexually molested, so that the city seethes with guilt, cries out with mental pains, with images no-one ought to bear. The wounds of immorality lie like great wounds across whole communities, as if a butchers cleaver has carved up your fabric. Houses and homes destroyed into bitterness, violence and incest. And you export this! You talk about it on shows! Shows to show evil? And you call it news! How depraved can a city be? And no Christian effectively raises their voice against such abominations? Cause 4: City of Perverted Christianity Except of course in church. I forgot about your churches. So many! So many! So corrupted! So filthy! Greed in the offering basket, oppression and manipulation in the leaderships, tinsel on the stage. But there are some struggling congregations that have not denied my simplicities. Some that seek truth in choosing different pathways of quiet humility. For their sakes I have been trying to speak and have withheld my hand. Tinsel, greed and immorality abound within your walls and reflect in your weekly shows. I cannot abide immorality and worship, injustice and celebrations. An empty Christianity, from liberal to evangelical to Pentecostal to Catholic, there is little difference. Yet there are some who have walked in godly obedience. Cause 5: A City Symbolizing Perverted Justice My children, how I would have lead you to become truly a people. But in the name of freedom you have perverted justice. Are there no law courts that cannot be overturned by the wealth of your wicked? Your Rodney Kings, your O.J.s are only the tip of the iceberg of legalized injustice that marks your land. I cannot bear it. Cause 6: Perversion of Your Gifts to the Nations I hate you, Los Angeles, with a fury, a vengeful hatred for what you have done to your migrants, those who came seeking new life, new hope, and to them you gave only bonded labor. I hate you, Los Angeles, for what you have done against the nations, the shattering of centuries, shattering of marriages and clans. So much I gave you of creativity, and you turned it into evil. Such a great city of literature and research, of books and ideas. And you perverted them into weapons of evil. Called to be a blessing to the nations, you are known as the scourge of the world. Called to be a light, your media has become a purveyor of darkness. My soul knows nothing but fury. Why should I not release on you all the destruction my hands can muster? Why should I not wipe you out of existence? Give me one reason for allowing you to continue in your pornographic fantasies, in your lust and wine, in your screenplays of barbarity? But you can give me no reason. Yet I wait. Yet I delay. I hesitate. For in this great city there are many who know my name. Why did they not rise up? Why did they not speak out? Why did they not even try to mobilize? Was the technology of evil too strong for them? Cause 7: Pastors Failing to Seek Justice How I have loved the pastors of this city, such a bulwark against a collapsing culture, such people of strength when all around is crumbling. There is unity in leadership. But they have not done my will in leading a city into righteousness in its public squares. And there is now insufficient time to redeem. Pastors have played church and failed to organize the workers across the city, across the disciplines into effective strike teams to combat the evil, industry by industry. The pastors wanted the tithe, not the victory outside their churches of societal change for righteousness, loving their own voice, they would not listen to the voices of the workshop, the artisan and the factory worker. So injustice has blossomed and can no longer be cured. Like the bugs on the roots of a dying plant, there is no solution except to root the plant out and burn it. They have loved revival and church growth for it fills their churches. They love events, and even prayer events, but they do not organize for justice. They know nothing of consistent planning to overturn the communal sins. They do not organize to speak to the sins of the city fathers. They do not know the city fathers. They do not know their hidden sins. How is it that to them I have given the gifts of discernment - special gifts to see in and beyond the hearts of men? Yet they have not taken them into the streets , the legal dens and the marketplace! The hour glass is near empty. The city will be no more. For these sins, I will destroy it all. It is past my time of warning. This is what the Lord says, Viv Grigg WILLIAM BRANHAM'S PROPHECY FOR LOS ANGELES 1960 Along with this prophecy, William Branham wrote the following: "Thou city, who claims to be the city of angels, who has exalted yourself into heaven and sent all the dirty, filthy things of fashions and things, until even the foreign countries come here to pick up our filth and send it away, with your fine churches and steeples and so forth the way you do, remember one day you will be laying in the bottom of the sea! Your great honeycomb under you right now. The wrath of God is belching right beneath you. How much longer He will hold this sandbar hanging over that, when that ocean out yonder a mile deep will slide in there plumb back to the Salton Sea. It will be worse than the last day of Pompeii. Repent Los Angeles! Repent the rest of you and turn to God! The hour of His wrath is upon the earth. Flee while there is time to flee and come to Christ." "So I pray Thee Lord, in Jesus Name, let the people shake themselves tonight and flee from the wrath that is to come, for Ichabod is written over the doors and over the nation. A black check mark is come across it, the Spirit of God is grieved away from it, and they're weighed in the balance and found wanting. The feast of King Nebuchadnezzar has repeated again with drunken parties and half-dressed women calling themselves Christians." Prophetic Alert: Los Angeles 5 Kiloton nuclear explosion Date Received: 10/20/99, 5:00 A.M. Stephen L. Bening In a dream, I was standing in a room, looking out of a large plate glass window, overlooking a city that had low rise buildings of about 5 stories as an average. I was at a height of about 5 to 10 stories up myself. It was dark outside. All at once, I noticed a group of fighter planes heading my way. Suddenly, they fired a weapon in my direction. The weapon emitted three blue pulses of light. When they hit the area where I was, I had the sense of being exposed to radiation, or so it seemed, because the effect seemed to fade. I now realized that I was having a vision within my dream. I went to gather my wife and my five children. Before I could move much, I saw the flash of a nuclear explosion. A voice accompanied the flash which said, "Los angeles has just been hit by a 5 Kiloton nuclear explosion." I was frantically trying to gather my family to head downstairs. All at once, I found myself in a building that was familiar to me. It was Bening Square, in Carbondale, Illinois. My father remodeled this office building in 1963. He built a bombshelter in the basement. I had been in this bombshelter when I was a child. At any rate, we traversed the stairs, going down into the basement, trying to reach the bombshelter ahead of the arrival of the blast wave. When I reached the place where the bombshelter was supposed to be, there was a little room in its place that was a prayer chapel. I discovered that the prayer chapel was operated by Dr. Zach Fomum of Cameroon and his wife Prisca. Prisca began to pray with my wife Erica. I was concerned that I did not know where my eldest daughter Lorel was. The dream then ended. I looked behind me on the bed and my digital clock was just turning over to 5:00 A.M. and the Lord impressed upon my spirit that the dream had been from him. Contents of this dream were summarized and quickly sent to Apostle Zach Fomum in Cameroon. After prayer, I was given some private interpretation relative to my own personal situation, but I have not been given any more light with respect to the national implications of the prophetic part of the dream. Your servant in Christ Jesus, Stephen L. Bening Destruction of Los Angeles by Fire Dream Feb.2006 Brian Charles I dreamed that I received a prophecy, but didn't receive the words of it. But I sent the prophecy to my sister. I saw the whole, entire city of Los Angeles on FIRE!!! Fierce flames were furiously consuming all of the buildings of that vast city, while I was watching some buildings burning ferociously by big consuming fires in the suburb of Montclair at the same time. Prophetic Word Given through Brian Charles "Depart from the city of My wrath." (meaning Los Angeles) GREAT EARTHQUAKES, SUITCASE NUCLEAR BOMBS, VOLCANOES, VIRUSES, ECONOMIC COLLAPSE, GEOGRAPHIC SHAKING & RESHAPING, FLOODS, ETC. WHEN WILL THIS NATION REPENT?Bob Jones Prophecy When our cities are leveled. I don't like this thought, but I'm not the only one having these visions. We're going to have entire cities leveled. I know of a city that is going to be leveled by a storm. I know of a lot of Midwest cities that are going to get five feet of rain just like that. Do you have any idea what will happen to a city that is used to getting 24-36 inches of rain in a year, if they get five foot of it in two or three days? I was told that Hurricane Danny (which He revealed to us right before it happened exactly how it was going to move) was a parable that He was trying to show to the prophets. That whole hurricane was a warning to the United States, and if they want it, they can have it. I'm telling you, when people of old cried out, "God, we are not able to stand it." Holy people and holy prophets cried out and they stood in the gap, God relented of the judgment. Now there are going to be cities leveled that can't be stopped. But they can be warned; and only those who want to be there can be there. I can't stop the leveling of it, but I can tell you this: God will warn. He will warn those cities. I'VE BEEN TELLING PEOPLE FOR A YEAR TO GET OUT OF LOS ANGELES. They tell me that they're really brave out there. (sigh) I'm not that brave. Because that bravery is against God. IF I LIVED IN LOS ANGELES, I'D GET OUT. I want to tell you something. The EARTHQUAKE is not the only thing you got to worry about in Los Angeles, and I'm not sure it will be first. In a vision, I saw suitcases being smuggled in by terrorists into California. They had NUCLEAR BOMBS in them. Two days after I brought this in Nashville, a Baptist man came and brought the same word, only he didn't bring it as a prophecy; he brought it as a reality. He had been in Russia, and he knew one of Yeltsin's right hand men who told him: "There are 126 SUITCASE ATOMIC BOMBS MISSING from our arsenal. And we know they have been sold to terrorists, and we believe they are trying to get them into the United States and Israel." I don't believe we've got to 2,000. I've been asking the church to begin to intercede that these suitcases be caught; that these terrorists be caught. Because Satan intends to start the THIRD WORLD WAR ahead of time. We are going to have a third world war. It's going to happen. But I'm sure it's not going to happen before the timing that has been set. one of those explode in San Francisco, we'd have bombers immediately on their way with atomic warheads and we'd be in a Third World War. By the way, all of your money would be worthless then. And everything that you live by would be worthless. What would you do for WATER? That would be blown up; you wouldn't have any water. AND THAT'S THE MAIN DANGER IN CALIFORNIA. Those things are going to happen. Do you know what's around Mammoth Lake and some of those places? All the water flumes would break to Los Angeles. There's a dam there called Hoover. When that thing breaks, have you any idea of how many? There's 25 million people it would affect. When that thing breaks, I saw underneath the Salton Sea, and I've spoke that the real trembling and everything would begin around the Salton Sea, and that the next warning would come around the Salton Sea. Well, it did. Joshua Tree and Landers, is where this last one came, which was a warning! I believe the next one is getting ready to happen when this volcano will erupt when the plates can't take the pressure anymore. And I believe the pressure are melting the plates down there to where this has got to be vented, and these earthquakes are just a sign of what is getting ready to happen. It's getting ready to blow! When it does, it will break loose all the way to the Sea of Cortez , right up the Los Angeles river. And that plate in there will separate from the United States, and you can drive a boat up that river. You can go from the Gulf of Cortez to the Pacific Ocean . And Death Valley will be a great inland sea. And we aren't far from that. I really expect though, something Jim Bakker said, even before this happens, OUR ECONOMY GETS DESTROYED WITH A GREAT EARTHQUAKE IN JAPAN. TOKYO. Some of those around; it's already started. And they pull all of our money out, and our stock market plummets (and it's in the Shepherd's Rod). So all these things are ready. They aren't....This isn't something we're trying to scare you with. It's something we're trying to prepare you to SURVIVE. For one of the worst things that is going to happen to many of you at that time is FEARING OF FEAR. It's running around like a chicken with his head cut off. It's time for you to get grounded in your faith. You're going to have to put on Christ to survive. You're going to have to take off the old man and the unregenerated nature, and put on Christ. Dream of Los Angeles NUKED - Revelation 18 Richard Riding Dream on 6/16/85 L. A. NUKED I had a dream , I don't know if I was in the spirit or body. I was at a fire station in Los Angeles, CA, early in the morning hours. Its as if I was transferred there for a temporary stay. I had my uniform and fire gear in my car. I reported to the captain and was trying to find a bed to sleep in for the balance of the night. I went to the dormitory, upstairs, and it was full of beds with men sleeping in them. It was crowded and I found a bed with out a mattress. So I decided to go down stairs, when I got there, there were other firemen milling around out in the front of the station. I could see their faces and I knew some of them from my earlier days as a fireman.(1962-1978). While outside I was talking to three chiefs of different rank. While we were talking , a particular high ranking chief ( I don't know who he was) came running out of the fire house towards his chiefs car in his turnout clothes, in a panic and I mean Panic. He tried to get in his chiefs car and drive away,!but his aid (fireman who drives for him) stopped him from doing so. He kept hollering, "I have to get out of here, I have to get out of here". The next thing I heard was a whaling noise (siren). I looked up and heard a noise and saw, it seemed like thousands of jet aircraft traveling fast with their afterburners blasting. (I was in the airforce for four years.) There were literally thousands of them. It was dark in the early morning and I could see the flames coming out of their engines tail pipes. I made a commit to one of the chiefs, "There is thousands of them".( They were fighter aircraft.) The chief was looking at me with a scared look and I said to him, "Jesus is coming". When I said this there was a bright flash in the sky and the heavens glowed with a bright light. I fell to the ground and heard screaming of the men around me. I could feel the heat of the light around me ( It was an atomic bomb) exploding in the Los Angeles area. I then woke up and had the strangest feeling of emptiness that this is going to happen in Los Angeles, IT WAS SO REAL. Richard D. Riding Sr. San Diego Nuked? Garrett Crawford - 4/15/07 I was standing over a small model city that had a toy train in it. This city was San Diego. The toy train ran all through the city and there was a nuclear bomb on the train. I was so obsessed with this train and the nuclear bomb that was inside it. I would watch the train and see where it went, constantly wondering when and where the bomb inside of it would go off. This train was the focus of my attention and I did nothing but think about it. After a while I began to lose my focus and my obsession for the train and the bomb, and I walked away from the model city. After I walked away, the train stopped and I never got to see if the bomb went off, if it ever even did. http://www.unleavenedbreadministries.org/?page=memphis-mushroomcloud California Nuked Into the Sea? Sultana - 9/17/07 The year before 9/11, I dreamed of 4 explosions. I told my husband that the World Trade Center was blown up and I saw an explosion on the ground, then I saw the Pentagon explode. In the fall of 2003 I began to hear the sound of pinging like that of a submarine. I began to pray and ask God what this was and He gave me this dream: I saw a small black submarine, shaped like a fat cigar off the cost of California. Then I saw it fire a missile and hit the land, breaking off and sinking a big part of California. Then I saw flood waters sweep over a large part of the rest of California and I woke up. (Note from David: I have heard this before for California and Florida. The Russians and Americans were doing research to use nukes to turn the earth beneath large areas fluid to sink them.) http://www.unleavenedbreadministries.org/?page=calnuked Nuclear Warning http://exodus2006.com/nukes.htm I originally saw this warning at a page on at Asia Times Online website but it was retracted a few hours later. You can view the retraction and I have included most of the relevant text below on this page. There is a good article about this story at Earth Changes TV and there is more at the ' Details Here ' website. Although the verdict of the Snopes website is that the statement is a hoax, the evidence that they do have suggests it wasn't written with the intention of being read by an English speaking audience, and they don't know who wrote it originally. It is not possible to be sure if the content of the article is true - but it is all possible. There are supporting articles at: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=25250 http://news.independent.co.uk/world/asia_china/story.jsp?story=102409 http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/7/14/214727.shtml The Interview: Al-Jazeera was granted an interview with one Mohammed al-Usuquf, allegedly al-Qaeda's number three. Al-Usuquf's most startling revelation is that "Atomic bombs won't be launched, they are already there". "Seven nuclear heads have already been positioned on American soil, before September 11, and they are ready to be detonated. Before September 11, American security was a fiasco, and even later, if we needed, we could position the bombs there. They arrived through seaports, as normal cargo. A nuclear head is not bigger than a fridge, so it can easily be camouflaged as one. Thousands of containers arrive at a seaport every day, and even with very efficient security, it's impossible to check and examine each one of them." Al-Usuquf says that the bombs were bought on the black market: five from the former USSR and two from Pakistan. The five Russian heads "are from T-3 missiles, also known as RD-107, and their power is around 100 kilotons each, that is five times the Hiroshima bomb. The Pakistani ones are less powerful, something around 10 kilotons each." Each of the Russian bombs would have cost around $200 million. Al-Qaeda was able to raise the money "because we have many sponsors. Many countries sponsor us, and also some very rich people." And not all of these are Arab countries. "Some European countries as well are also interested in the fall of the US." As to the "rich people", they are "people who are also tired of seeing the US bleeding the rest of the world." And Iraq's Saddam Hussein, says Al-Usuquf, is not one of these people, "but just a collaborator, represented by Abdul TawabHawaish, his vice prime minister and responsible for Iraq's arms program". Al-Usuquf says that the bombs cannot be detected by US authorities. "Even if they are old, they were modernized and are very well hidden. Even if they were located, they have auto-detonation mechanisms in case something or someone gets close. Even an electromagnetic pulse is not capable of deactivating them." The bombs allegedly cannot be detected because "they are enveloped in thick layers of lead". They could be detonated "by various methods - cell phone call, radio frequency, seismic shock or by their regressive clock". Al-Usuquf details the whole plan. "First, one head would be detonated, which would cause the deaths of 800,000 to 1 million people and a chaos never seen before. During this chaos, two or three planes, which are now disassembled inside barns near empty roads in the US countryside, would take off in suicide missions to pulverize another two or three big American cities with chemicals. Once the disease was identified, all seaports and airports would be quarantined. Land borders would also be closed. No plane, boat or car would enter or leave the US. This would be total chaos." The first target would be the city "that would offer the best conditions, for example bright sky and winds of eight or more miles an hour blowing towards the center of the country, so radioactive dust can contaminate the largest possible area". This attack would not knock out the US, recognizes al-Usuquf, "But the process would be initiated. As with the World Trade Center, it would be just a question of time for the whole economic structure to be turned to dust. If the objectives are reached with one bomb and diseases, probably we will save the lives of other people, but it's risky, and probably six more bombs will be detonated, one a week, and more attacks with chemical weapons will be launched." According to estimates made by al-Usuquf "and Ayman al-Zawahiri", al-Qaeda's number 2, about 15 million people would die, victims of the bombs and the radiation. Among those contaminated by diseases, "25 percent will die, a figure around more than 5 million, plus many others due to the chaos and disorder". Al-Usuquf does not fear an American military response. "Even if five or 10 cities are chosen at random to be destroyed, it will still be a small price to pay. The problem is that the economic despair will be so great that even if it saves by not using weapons, American liquidity will be near zero, and the US will make more money selling a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier to Turkey or Italy for $5 billion, because they will urgently need to recapitalize. But it will be too late. Moreover, what will remain of an American soldier's morale to fight knowing that his whole family died and his country ceased to exist? To fight for what?" The world economy would not collapse, says al-Usuquf, although "in the beginning, it will be very difficult. But without the US the world will soon rise in a more just and fraternal manner. Nothing can stop the plan." And whatever America does, "it's too late." When will the attack begin? "I can't tell." Newer Version Sunday, December 7, 2003 Q: "How does Al Qaeda intend to destroy the most powerful nation in history?" A: "It's a question of logistics. Using its own poison, that is, attacking the heart of what they consider the most important thing in the world: money." -Mr. Mohammed Al-Asuquf, Al Qaeda Third-in-command Al-Asuquf: "The beginning will be the detonation of a nuclear device, which will cause the death of between 800 thousand and one million people and create chaos on a scale never seen before. During this chaos, two or three crop sprayers that are now dismantled and stored in granaries close to little-used highways in the countryside will take off on suicide missions to spray two or three large American cities with smallpox. That means that once the smallpox has been identified, all airports and seaports will be closed by quarantine. Land borders will likewise be shut down. Not one airplane, ship or vehicle will enter or leave the United States. This will cause total chaos. White House Press secretary Ari Fleischman will be very busy." HOW, WHY AND WHEN TO DESTROY THE UNITED STATES Is this interview a hoax as the "powers-that-be" want us to believe? When you read it, you will see why it has been suppressed, especially to citizens in the United States... Yes, it is a hoax, to the extent the masses continue to believe in the reality of Al Qaeda, rather than its creators-worldwide intelligence agencies funding the whole show, and in the case of the Mossad, its actual participation at strategic intervals. December 1, 2002 - The following interview was conducted by a reporter for the Al- Jazeera network with the third-in-command of the Al Qaeda organization, Mr. Mohammed Al-Asuquf. Al-Asuquf's background is impressive; a doctorate in physics and masters in international economics. In the interview, he talks of Al Qaeda's plans with total detachment, with deep knowledge and an unshakeable commitment to his cause. This interview was sent to Abel-Bari Atwan, chief editor of Al Quds, an Arabic-language newspaper published in London, but was never printed, due to its highly revealing contents. A copy of the interview came to Foz-do-Iguacu, and was translated into Portuguese by a university professor in the city's Arab community. This is probably the only existing version of this interview not in Arabic. Al-Jazeera: What is the objective of the Al Qaeda network? Al-Asuquf: To destroy the Great Satan, that is, the United States and Israel. Incorrect, the Great Satan is the reptilian/Illuminati cabal manipulating the world's power positions. Al-Jazeera: Why? Al-Asuquf: The USA over the past 60 years has been impregnating the world with its arrogance, greed and malfeasance. It is the incarnation of all that is evil. The people of this planet don't deserve this torture. There is no USA per se; the satanically controlled leadership marches to the drumbeat of the long planned agenda for singular global control, currently in its final stages. The destruction of the US, via the Trojan horse of terrorism, is the created problem, while also serving as a final catalyst for global governance. Al-Jazeera: Isn't this view somewhat one-sided? Of course it is, how else could conflict be elevated unless both sides created reasons to do so. Al-Asuquf: No; one only has to observe recent events. The disrespect of the Kyoto treaty; the case of the Permanent Court of International Justice, their inaction with regards to our Palestinian brothers; the financial greed and absurd speculations in Third World countries; the complete indifference to other oppressed people and countless other situations which all of the world's leaders well know. And on top of all that, the Bush doctrine of "shoot first and ask questions later." This is an unacceptable abuse and will therefore have very grave consequences. Who can argue with those statements? Al-Jazeera: But the isn't the development and influence of America the fruit of its own competence? Al-Asuquf: Competence in extortion, competence in subjugation, competence in lying. After the Second World War, the USA was the only industrialized country with its manufacturing infrastructure intact. Loaning money like a good loan shark, it ended up becoming a very rich and powerful country; however, its greed remained undiminished. Today, Americans live like maharajas , wasting more than any other people, spending more than $80 billion per year just on gambling. They've lost any notion of spirituality and live in constant sin. With each passing day the USA demonstrates that it doesn't know how to live with other peoples; for this, it deserves destruction. Yes, this is true, but the U.S. change of character is simply the movie being played out, regardless of whether Al-Asuquf is a willing pawn or not. Al-Jazeera: Wouldn't it be easier to simply assassinate President George Bush? Al-Asuquf: In the first place, it would do no good, other than turning him into a martyr. When you face a powerful enemy, the best strategy is not to kill him, but to make him lose his leadership due to his incompetence, and let him live to watch this unfold. His removal is immaterial. Al-Jazeera: Does the Al Qaeda network have the military capacity to make war on the United States? Al-Asuquf: If we analyze history, we will see that all great wars, before they were started, were based on previously established concepts . But if we observe well, we will see that these concepts and strategies came to nothing, since a new type of war was ultimately waged. An example is the construction of the Maginot line by the French before the First World War, which, in reality proved to be completely useless against the invading forces. Aircraft carriers, nuclear submarines, and spy satellites will be useless in the next war. Al-Jazeera: American authorities hold more than 1,000 people suspected of terrorism since September 11th. Won't this compromise Al Queda's plans? Al-Asuquf: Of those imprisoned, perhaps 20 to 30 percent belong to Al Queda. Moreover, they are from the second echelon. We have more than 500 members of the first echelon and 800 from the second, inside the United States. Al-Jazeera: What do you mean by first and second echelons? Al-Asuquf: In the first echelon are Al Qaeda members who have been in the United States for more than 10 years, many married with children. They have detailed knowledge of our plans and are just waiting for a phone call. They are also known as "sleepers." Those of the second echelon have arrived in the last five years and have no idea of our plans. Al-Jazeera: Are even those who are married, with children, ready to die with their families? Al-Asuquf: Yes. All of them are ready to die. Long live September 11th. Yes, it was the kickoff to the big party. Al-Jazeera: What was September 11th to Al Qaeda's overall plans? Al-Asuquf: As a general step, it was just the beginning. It was a way of calling the world's attention to what is still to come. Al-Jazeera: How many members does Al Qaeda have? Al-Asuquf: In the first echelon, about 5,000; in the second, about 20,000, all over the world. Al-Jazeera: In the detention camp at Guantanamo, are there any members of the first echelon? Al-Asuquf: No, in fact, many of those there are not even Al Qaeda members. Al-Jazeera: How does Al Qaeda intend to destroy the most powerful nation in history? Al-Asuquf: It's a question of logistics. Using its own poison, that is, attacking the heart of what they consider the most important thing in the world: money. Al-Jazeera: How so? Al-Asuquf: The American economy is an economy of false appearances. There is no real economic ballast to the American economy. The American GDP of is something around $10 trillion, of which just 1 percent represents agriculture, and just 24 percent represents industry. Therefore, 75 percent of the American GDP is service and most of this is financial speculation. For those who understand economics, and it appears that the American Secretary of the Treasury, Paul O'Neil, doesn't or doesn't see it, it's enough to say that the USA acts like a huge "dot-com," and dollars, strictly speaking, are its shares. Al-Jazeera: Can you explain that? Al-Asuquf: The value of a company's shares is directly proportional to the profitability of the enterprise. When a business is just a service provider and doesn't produce any durable goods, the value of its shares depends on its credibility. Which is to say that if the credibility of the USA were shaken, its shares (the dollar) would fall with incredible rapidity and the entire American economy would begin to collapse. Al-Jazeera: How can you be so sure of this? Al-Asuquf: On a smaller scale, it's exactly what large financial groups do to the countries of the third world to reap profits in one month that Swiss banks couldn't get in four or five years. Al-Jazeera: So how will Al Qaeda shock the American economy to this point? Al-Asuquf: By provoking a deficit of between $50 and $70 trillion dollars, the equivalent of the United States' GDP for five to seven years. Al-Jazeera: How will this be done? Al-Asuquf: With the destruction of the seven largest American cities, along with other measures. Al-Jazeera: By what means will this be done? Al-Asuquf: Using atomic bombs. Nothing new here.Sollog has warned for three years now to leave all western cities due to the danger of nuclear attacks, which he says, will destroy major cities and with it the global power of the U.S. as well. Al-Jazeera: With all of the security in the USA, how, hypothetically, will these bombs be smuggled onto American soil? Al-Asuquf: They won't be smuggled in, they're already there. Al-Jazeera: What are you saying? Al-Asuquf: There are already seven nuclear devices on American soil which were put in place before September 11th and are ready to be detonated. Al-Jazeera: How did they get in to the USA? Al-Asuquf: Before September 11, American security was a fiasco, and even after, were it necessary, we could manage to smuggle bombs into the United States. They entered through seaports, as normal cargo. Previously reported during the past few years. Al-Jazeera: How is that possible? Al-Asuquf: A nuclear device is no bigger than a refrigerator; therefore, it can be easily camouflaged as one. Millions of cargo containers arrive in seaports each day, and no matter how efficient security is, it's impossible to check, search through and examine each container. Al-Jazeera: Where did these atomic bombs come from? Al-Asuquf: They were purchased on the black market. Al-Jazeera: From whom? Al-Asuquf: We bought five from the defunct Soviet Union and two more from Pakistan. Previously reported as well. Al-Jazeera: How is it possible to buy an atomic bomb? Isn't there security? Al-Asuquf: Before 1989 it was practically impossible, however after the fall of the Berlin Wall, the Russian army began a process of self destruction, and some high generals began to lose their privileges, and therefore, highly susceptible to corruption. Even General Lebeb, now deceased, and Hans Blix, the head of the arms inspection commission of the United Nations, have stated this, notwithstanding denials by Russian Defense Minister SegueyIvanov. Al-Jazeera: How much does a nuclear bomb cost? Al-Asuquf: Somewhere around $200 million. Al-Jazeera: How did Al Qaeda get this money? Al-Asuquf: We have numerous sponsors. Yes, quite accurate. All Illuminati front organizations. Al-Jazeera: Who are they? Al-Asuquf: There are a number of countries, which support us, and also numerous wealthy individuals. Al-Jazeera: Are all of these countries Arab? Al-Asuquf: No, there are some European countries as well which have an interest in the fall of the USA. Al-Jazeera: Who are these wealthy individuals? Al-Asuquf: People who are also tired of watching the USA suck the wealth out of the rest of the world. Not exactly. First of all they are not exactly people, secondly, they intend to take it all for themselves. Al-Jazeera: Is Saddam Hussein one of them? Al-Asuquf: You could say that he's just one of the collaborators, through Abdul Tawab Mullah Hawaish, his vice-prime minister and the person responsible for Iraq's arms program. Al-Jazeera: Are these atomic bombs powerful ones? Al-Asuquf: The five Russian devices are from the old T-3 missiles, also known as RD-107s, and their potency is something around 100 kilotons each, that is, 5 times as powerful as the Hiroshima bomb. The Pakistani bombs are less powerful, somewhere around 10 kilotons. This is new. My information, passed on three years ago, indicated only lower yield suitcase devices. Al-Jazeera: Can't the bombs be detected and disarmed by American authorities? Al-Asuquf: No, in spite of their age they've undergone modernization and are well hidden. Even if they were found, they have auto detonation provisions should anything get close to them. Even electromagnetic pulses would be incapable of deactivating them. Al-Jazeera: Don't they emit radiation? Can't they be detected? Al-Asuquf: No. They are wrapped in thick leaden cases. Al-Jazeera: A suspected Pakistani ship was recently searched and all that was found were lead bars. Does this have anything to do with the bombs? Al-Asuquf: Yes, however that lead was just an extra layer, and was not essentially necessary. Al-Jazeera: How will the bombs be detonated? Al-Asuquf: There are numerous methods, a cell-phone call, radio frequency, seismic shocks or by timer. Al-Jazeera: Once detonated, how many deaths will be caused by these bombs? Al-Asuquf: It depends, since our plans are very malleable. Al-Jazeera: So what is the entire plan? Al-Asuquf: The beginning will be the detonation of a nuclear device, which will cause the death of between 800 thousand and one million people and create chaos on a scale never seen before. During this chaos, two or three crop sprayers that are now dismantled and stored in granaries close to little-used highways in the countryside will take off on suicide missions to spray two or three large American cities with smallpox. That means that once the smallpox has been identified, all airports and seaports will be closed by quarantine. Land borders will likewise be shut down. Not one airplane, ship or vehicle will enter or leave the United States. This will cause total chaos. White House Press secretary Ari Fleischman will be very busy. Al-Jazeera: But the American government has guaranteed that within five days it could produce enough smallpox vaccine to inoculate the entire population. Al-Asuquf: There will be simultaneous suicide attacks against the vaccine production plants. Al-Jazeera: Which will be the first city? Al-Asuquf: The first city will be that in which optimal conditions present themselves, for example, clear skies, and winds of eight miles-per-hour or less in the direction of the country's center so that radioactive dust can contaminate the maximum possible area. Al-Jazeera: Will this attack annihilate the USA? Al-Asuquf: No. But the process will have begun. Who will buy food products from the United States knowing they may have been contaminated by radiation? Who will travel to the United States knowing the possibility of contracting smallpox? Who will continue to invest in American institutions? Just as with the World Trade Center, it will be simply a question of time before the entire economic structure collapses and turns to dust. If our objectives are reached with one bomb and the smallpox, probably we'll save the lives of others, however that's risky , and it's probable that six more bombs will be detonated, one per week, and other attacks with chemical weapons will be carried out. Al-Jazeera: How many innocent people will die? Al-Asuquf: According to estimates made by me and Ayman Al-Zawahiri, somewhere around 15 million due to the atomic bombs and their radiation. Of those exposed to smallpox, 25 percent will die, approximately five million, and many more due to the ensuing chaos and disorder. Al-Jazeera: What about the American military response? Al-Asuquf: There will practically be none. Even if five or ten cities were chosen at random to be destroyed, that would still be a small price to pay. The problem is the economic despair will be so great that even economizing by not using arms unnecessarily will occur, since the liquidity of American goods will be almost zero and at that point the United States will make more selling its Nimitz-class aircraft carriers, which cost about five billion dollars, to Turkey or Italy for one billion dollars, since the country will so urgently need to recapitalize, though it will be too late. Moreover, how will the morale of American soldiers be knowing that their entire families have died and their country no longer exists. Fight for what? Al-Jazeera: And won't the global economy also be ruined? Al-Asuquf: In the beginning it will be very difficult; a serious economic crisis will ensue. However, without the United States, the world will soon arise in a more just and fraternal manner. Al-Jazeera: And Israel? Al-Asuquf: As they say... it will be dessert. Al-Jazeera: Does bin Laden's spokesman, Sulaiman Abu Gheith, know that you are giving this interview? Al-Asuquf: It was he and bin Laden who suggested I give it. Al-Jazeera: Osama bin Laden is still alive? Al-Asuquf: He is quite healthy, alongside his commanders Mohammed Atef and Khalid Shaik Mohammed and Mullah Omar. Al-Jazeera: Aren't you fearful that Al Qaeda's plans will be discovered? No, just the link to the Illuminati. Al-Asuquf: The plan is already in its countdown, and nothing can stop it. Al-Jazeera: Not even if the United States asks forgiveness and changes its attitudes? Al-Asuquf: That won't happen, and even if it did, it's too late. Al-Jazeera: When will the attack begin? Al-Asuquf: I can't reveal that. Allah Akbar. Suppose terrorists set off a nuclear bomb in a container in the Port of Long Beach? Suppose: "...terrorists conceal a 10-kiloton nuclear bomb in a shipping container and ship it to the Port of Long Beach. Unloaded onto a pier, it explodes shortly thereafter. This is referred to as a "ground-burst" as opposed to an "airburst" explosion." This is the sort of thing they think about at RAND: New RAND study models consequences of a nuke attack on a port. (Charles Meade and Roger Molander, August 2006) I learned about this from the Homeland Security Watch blog The immediate impact is: The infrastructure and ships in the Port of Long Beach and the adjoining Port of Los Angeles are completely destroyed by the blast and fires. Sixty thousand people die or will die soon because of direct blast effects and radiation poisoning. The radioactive fallout of water and sediment from the port exposes 150,000 people to hazardous radiation levels, requiring prompt medical attention. Six million people will try to evacuate the Los Angeles region to avoid the radioactive fallout. Gasoline is in critically short supply because of the effects on refineries in the Long Beach area. Long Beach refines approximately one-third of gasoline west of the Rockies, and there is no pipeline infrastructure to import supplies to the region. Radioactive fallout contaminates a 500-km region, prohibiting residence for 10-20 years. Two to three million residents will require relocation facilities. It may not be simple to redirect incoming shipping to alternative ports - even with advance planning: The principal challenge on this issue involves the conflict between the political desire to mitigate the risks of future attack compared with the business requirements for continued operation of the ports and the global shipping supply chain... Viewed from a national security perspective, there could be an immediate call to close all U.S. ports to incoming traffic. In contrast, parts of the business community might advocate an early opening of the ports. However, financial and real estate interests may require financial risk protection before shipping could resume, and this would be almost impossible to acquire following the Long Beach explosion. At the same time, there could be a large-scale exodus from U.S. port cities by local populations fearing the prospect of a second attack. Taken together, these results suggest there are reasonable prospects for extended closures of all U.S. ports following the Long Beach scenario, or at least for periods of substantially reduced operations. The issue is analogous to the cancellation of airline traffic following the 9/11 attacks, but the problem is much greater given the difficulties of screening 20,000 shipping containers per day originating from ports all over the world. From a business perspective, the problems revolve around the vital economic role of U.S. ports and the global shipping supply chain. Taken together, the Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles are the largest port of entry to America, and the third largest in the world, handling 30 percent of U.S. shipping imports by value in 2003. If all U.S. ports were closed, it would have large economic implications for almost all domestic business operations, and it would lead to severe disruptions in the availability of basic goods and petroleum in the United States. That is, there is a high probability that the Long Beach scenario would have large economic consequences at great distances from the initial nuclear explosion. It would also have important repercussions for global business activity because the value of imports and exports from all U.S. ports represents 7.5 percent of world trade activity. In the wake of these economic effects, it seems reasonable to assume that there would be large declines in world stock markets, in contrast to the relatively limited financial losses that followed the 9/11 attacks. While those attacks were unprecedented, they had only minor consequences for the economic infrastructure of the United States. In February I posted on a relatively more upbeat assessment of an attack on a port: What do you do, when the bomber gets through? (February 26, 2006) August 20, 2006 Permalink TrackBack TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341d9cb353ef00d8342b70e753ef Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Suppose terrorists set off a nuclear bomb in a container in the Port of Long Beach? : >> Rand Study of Nuclear Terrorism from EclectEcon Suppose: "...terrorists conceal a 10-kiloton nuclear bomb in a shipping container and ship it to the Port of Long Beach. Unloaded onto a pier, it explodes shortly thereafter. This is referred to as a "ground-burst" as oppos... Tracked on August 23, 2006 at 07:56 AM What do you do, when the bomber gets through? The terrorist bomber won't always get through, but the odds are good that, despite our best efforts, he'll (or she'll) get through once and a while. The damage will be reduced if we've thought ahead. This goes for port security. Jonathan Haveman is a trade economist. Here's another input into the port security production function, from his publication, In Search of Greater Policy Vision for Port Planning and Security (February 2004): There are big questions regarding port security that are not being asked. Perhaps the most important is: What is the most effective way to reduce the likelihood of an attack on a U.S. port? Here, there is a pair of alternatives: eliminating vulnerabilities, as current policies do, or implementing a good recovery plan, which current policies fail to do. Although these are alternatives, they are not exclusive. The most effective protection will likely involve a combination of the two. This is so, because in reality, it is unlikely that all vulnerable points will be covered. Given that there is always some risk remaining, the most cost-effective means for reducing risk further may be through reducing the attractiveness of the target. By way of example, suppose that the ports on the San Pedro Bay were put out of commission by an explosion for six months. In the absence of a well thought-out recovery plan, much of the trade destined for U.S. shores would sit idly by as flows were haphazardly redirected. With a plan in place for this eventuality, ships far out to sea could easily redirect as soon as the event occurred, reducing the adjustment cost associated with the port closure. As the cost of a port closure is reduced, the appeal of an attack on the port is similarly reduced. Pursuing both sides of the coin would seem the prudent approach to reducing the likelihood and resulting impact of an attack on a U.S. port. In order to most efficiently allocate the limited resources devoted to port security, spending should be focused on effectively reducing the likelihood of an event. This means paying attention to both increasing the difficulty of assaulting a port and mitigating the costs of an event after the fact. Coming to this conclusion requires greater vision than is currently evidenced in current port security planning. I'm not so sure that this would deter an attack on a port. This probably wouldn't affect the emotional impact of a successful attack; I think that impact is the terrorist's main objective. But it would reduce the economic costs of an attack, and contribute to the economy's resiliency in the face of the terrorist threat. I learned about Haveman's work from Daniel Drezner , who recommends: "An excellent primer on port security can be found in Jon D. Haveman, Howard J. Shatz, and Ernesto A. Vilchis (2005) "U.S. Port Security Policy after 9/11: Overview and Evaluation", Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management: Vol. 2: No. 4, Article 1 ." A subscription is required for access to this. Here is a PowerPoint presentation by these authors on this issue: An Overview of Port Security Programs . Revised: title change Feb 27. Osama's nuclear bomb Posted: November 08, 2001 1:00 am Eastern By David Dolan (c) 2011 WorldNetDaily.com Does Osama bin Laden possess the ultimate weapon - a nuclear bomb - in one form or another? Amid the heightened terrorist alert in the United States and elsewhere, examination of this radiating topic reverberates around the halls of Western governments, security services and in the international press. Meanwhile, I continue to be haunted by the words of an FBI agent, spoken to me when I was visiting Washington, D.C., in 1995. He revealed that federal officials had uncovered "substantial evidence" that bin Laden's al-Qaida terrorist network had smuggled several Soviet-built nuclear suitcase bombs into the United States. Although the ultimate proof of this contention would be an explosion that no one but America's worst enemies wants to take place, the circumstantial evidence is apparently compelling enough to keep sending Vice President Dick Cheney to his "undisclosed location." The fact that the Kremlin built such weapons is accepted by most Western spy agencies, even if one of the first persons to publicly reveal it was the controversial Russian General Alexander Lebed. He claimed in 1996 that negligent post-Soviet Russian officials had lost track of an astounding 134 of these deadly mini devices, thought to be capable of completely leveling everything within a couple miles of ground zero - not to mention covering an even wider area with carcinogenic nuclear poisons. Even if just a few of the suitcase nukes are unaccounted for, it would be a few too many. Reports continue to circulate that some of these field nuclear devices ended up in the hands of Chechen Muslim groups, who passed them along (for a substantial price) to bin Laden. While this has not been concretely proved as far as I can tell, it is clear to Western security agencies that Chechen rebels have close connections to al-Qaida and its notorious leader. That bin Laden desperately desires to acquire nuclear bombs is also quite evident, given that he has publicly said so. On top of the strong possibility that the Arabian terrorist leader has gotten his jihad hands on KGB-built portable-luggage bombs, it is clear that he has strong supporters in the Pakistani nuclear scientific community. Pakistan's chief nuclear engineer, Bashiruddin Mahmoud, has not hidden his glowing affection for the turbaned desert warrior. Still, it is thought to be extremely unlikely that he might have been able to arrange a nuclear weapons transfer to al-Qaida operatives. Yet his advice would be invaluable if bin Laden succeeded in getting the material needed to build a nuclear device from elsewhere, as many experts fear he has probably done. The contention that bin Laden would have no moral qualms about using such a hideous weapon on his perceived infidel enemies, even if most were civilians, is self evident. After all, it was not the recently revealed CIA office near the World Trade Center that was his main target on Sept. 11. The Saudi dissident realized that the twin towers would be full on a Tuesday morning with civilian workers going about their daily jobs. If 5,000 infidel lives are good to take, surely 500,000 are much better. Chemical strike on New York Seemingly confirming that mass slaughter is the ultimate goal of some Islamic terrorist militants, I was told by another American security official while visiting the Midwest a few years ago that the original World Trade Center attack in 1993 had a non-conventional chemical component. He further revealed that this fact was concealed from the public on orders of senior officials in the Clinton administration, although he did not impute them with evil motives in doing so. He opined that the administration apparently did not want to "worry" the general public with such frightening details. According to my source, deadly nerve agents were placed amid the explosives that blew up in the parking garage underneath the WTC. The Arab terrorists - whom he thought were probably linked to Saddam Hussein - apparently hoped that the debilitating chemicals would be widely dispersed by the truck bomb explosion, killing thousands of people in nearby portions of lower Manhattan. In the actual event, the heat of the intense fire that followed the powerful blast quickly destroyed all but a few traces of the chemical agents, said my source. There is substantial circumstantial evidence that this same "look the other way" attitude carried the day after the TWA Flight 800 explosion in the skies off of Long Island a few years later. After all, why spoil the "feel good" '90s with the reality that despite the collapse of the dreaded Soviet Union, America still had real enemies out there plotting to reduce her to ashes? Some who see darker motives behind such apparent government complacency might wonder if the secular humanist propensity to totally ignore the Islamic fundamentalist terrorist threat until forced to do otherwise on Sept. 11 does not reveal something far more sinister. Indeed, there is apparent room to wonder if some Western secular-humanist leaders - especially those who openly disdain their fellow humans who choose to look to the heavens for Divine guidance - have not long viewed the growing Islamic terrorist menace as a powerful tool to further their ultimate goal of ushering in a New World Order. Expert warrior Although Osama bin Laden and his mainly Middle East henchmen might appear to come from the Middle Ages to most folks in the West, he is clearly a very clever man. This is demonstrated by his carefully crafted video sermons, designed to pull every possible chain to stir up the Muslim masses in support of his self-declared holy war. This guy knows what he is after, and probably has a long-range game plan of how to get there. It may well include a nuclear explosion at an appropriate moment. If you have been following this potential hair-splitting aspect of the unfolding terrorist story in recent weeks, you might know that many nuclear experts doubt that the alleged missing Soviet devices are still able to perform their intended task. Such scientists assure us that the tritium triggers needed to detonate the portable bombs have undoubtedly decayed by now, rendering the devices useless. However, some note that it is possible to recharge the triggers for someone who knows his way around such technical concerns, which might include the Pakistani scientist Mahmoud. At any rate, it is relatively easy to produce a so-called "dirty bomb" comprised of regular explosives laced with nuclear waste materials. Although the kill ratio would be relatively modest from such a blast, it would still act as a powerful psychological weapon in a terrorist war currently focused on the threat of more anthrax attacks. I have not been able to secure any official comment about recent media reports that alert Israeli security forces intercepted a Palestinian terrorist trying to smuggle such a bomb into the Tel Aviv area a couple weeks ago. It seems that government leaders here think that the public is stressed out enough as it is, which is surely the case. However, such an interception might help explain why Prime Minister Ariel Sharon felt compelled to cancel his important trip to the United States this week for "security reasons." After all, he is no longer too upset with the Bush administration for attempting to force Israeli troops out of Yasser Arafat's towns. Sharon is instead quite pleased that U.S. officials have now officially placed the groups that were the main targets of his recent army incursion - known activists belonging to the Popular Front PLO splinter group, Hamas and the Islamic Jihad group - on the administration's official terrorist list. He would be happier still if U.S. officials formally recognized that members of Arafat's own Palestinian Authority have engaged in terror strikes over the past year, but he knows that would be asking way too much. Why wait? If Osama and gang have anything nuclear hidden up their flowing sleeves, why haven't they revealed this by launching an attack before now? After all, al-Qaida and Taliban forces are being pummeled by American aircraft in Afghanistan day after day, with no dramatic terrorist response so far in the West other than possibly a few anthrax spores in some mailed envelopes. The answer could be that recent U.S. government warnings and stepped up security have thwarted such an attack, at least for now. Or perhaps the terrorists have been deliberately giving out false information to wear down weary American security forces and the general public, waiting for a later day to act when the overall guard has dropped a little bit. My guess is that the wily bin Laden is not suffering all that badly at present, despite the massive American bombing campaign. He knows that support for the counter-terrorism war is already waning in the West, especially in Europe where hand wringing over relatively modest civilian casualties is reaching fever pitch (when will all realize that this is not a game of virtual war?). Meanwhile additional jihad warriors are crossing over porous Afghan borders everyday, some coming from as far away as England and Indonesia. Without wishing to add to the terrorist problem by further alarming any reader who is already having trouble sleeping at night, I suggest that the Arabian "Robin Hood" may be waiting to unleash his nuclear genii until he can achieve the maximum emotional Islamic response to such a dastardly attack. As a longtime friend and observer of many Arabs belonging to the growing worldwide population of Mohammad's faithful followers, I would nominate the holy month of Ramadan as the ideal time to strike. It is always a period of heightened religious fervor in the Muslim world, as I have witnessed many times firsthand. This year, Ramadan begins on Nov. 17. Such an audacious terrorist assault would really get Osama's jihad struggle off the ground - off the ground of the new Ground Zero. Special Offer: Is the world facing all-out war in the Middle East? Get David Dolan's " Israel in Crisis ," Now available in WorldNetDaily's online store! If you'd rather order by phone, call WND's toll-free customer service line at 1-800-4WND-COM (1-800-496-3266). David Dolan is a Jerusalem-based author and journalist who has lived in Israel since 1980. He reported for CBS Radio for over 12 years. Read more: Osama's nuclear bomb http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=25250#ixzz1IO3mvP7W Hidden Bombs; Avian Flu; Translations Nuclear Bomb hidden in old warehouse in Los Angeles MesakeCoalala mesakec@forumsec.org.fj In the early hours of Sunday morning, 10/9/05 I had this dream. (Note: For quite a few weeks now I have been praying to the Lord that he visit all my friends and relatives around the world in dreams, visions and revelations and show them that the tribulation is about to start and that it was time to repent and turn to the Lord.) I dreamt that I was in Los Angeles. I was sitting on a table with an unsaved cousin of mine. He was telling me how the Lord has been showing him dreams of the whereabouts of the enemy's nuclear bombs that have been hidden away in the U.S. He described to me an old, derelict, rundown warehouse where a nuclear warhead was hidden. In the dream I was really happy. God was answering my prayers and my friends and relatives were being warned. About 12.30AM, Monday morning, 10/10/05 I had this intense dream. In the dream I saw people panicking and fleeing towards the East Coast of the United States. I was wondering what the people were fleeing from. Then I heard the words "Avian Flu" or something that sounded similar but I am sure it was Avian Flu. I saw soldiers mercilessly shooting people who were slow to flee. As I looked at the soldiers the word "Nazi" came to my mind. I then saw this Polynesian family who were slow to flee. The parents had decided since they couldn't make it they might as well hide under the the big septic tank beside their home. Little did the family know that a soldier had spotted them. Somehow I knew what soldier was thinking - he was thinking of blowing up the whole septic tank along with the family. As the chaos spread, I started praying and said something like this: "Lord what do you want me to do?" Immediately, my body had this bright, orange glow. I saw a few other people who had the same orange glow on them. Like the others I could clearly hear the voice of the Lord directing me on who to minister to. We were translated from place to place only at the Lord's direction. I remember telling a group of people what was happening and leading them to the Lord. I then was directed to go to someone whose name was Urn...This Urn had shared a prophecy which I was interested in. I then woke up at about 1:00 AM thinking it was for real. http://www.unleavenedbreadministries.org/?page=bombs-flu-translations FEMA Preparing for Mass Destruction Attacks on Cities http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/7/14/214727.shtml John O. Edwards Monday, July 15, 2002 FEMA, the federal agency charged with disaster preparedness, is engaged in a crash effort to prepare for multiple mass destruction attacks on U.S. cities - including the creation of sprawling temporary cities to handle millions of displaced persons, NewsMax has learned. FEMA is readying for nuclear, biological and chemical attacks against U.S. cities, including the possibility of multiple attacks with mass destruction weapons. The agency has already notified vendors, contractors and consultants that it needs to be prepared to handle the logistics of aiding millions of displaced Americans who will flee from urban areas that may be attacked. The agency plans to create emergency, makeshift cities that could house hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of Americans who may have to flee their urban homes if their cities are attacked. Ominously, FEMA has been given a deadline of having the cities ready to go by January 2003 - in about six months. A source familiar with the deadline believes the effort is related to making the U.S. prepared for counterattacks if the U.S. invades Iraq sometime next year. FEMA is currently seeking bids from major real estate management firms, and plans to name three firms in the near future to handle the logistics and planning for these temporary cities. FEMA officials have told these firms they already have tents and trailers ordered. The tents and trailers would provide shelter for displaced populations. The real estate firms are expected to provide engineers and architects to lay the plans for emergency infrastructure needs, such as sewage and electricity. Editor's Note: This story first appeared in NewsMax's Insider Report - emailed to subscribers to NewsMax's news alert service. To sign up for this free service - and receive many stories not published on NewsMax.com - Click Here. Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics: Homeland/Civil Defense U.S. Vulnerable to Catastrophic Attack, Congress Told NewsMax.com Wires Thursday, June 23, 2005 Despite the federal government's expensive efforts to prevent terrorists from smuggling a nuclear weapon into the U.S., the nation remains extremely vulnerable to a catastrophic attack, experts have warned a House committee. Highly enriched uranium, a crucial ingredient in a nuclear device, could be shielded with less than a quarter-inch of lead, making it "very likely to escape detection by passive radiation monitors," Benn Tannenbaum, a physicist and senior program associate at the American Association for the Advancement of Science, testified at the June 21 hearing of the Homeland Security subcommittee. Committee members were told that the monitors, now installed at ports and border stations, can't distinguish between naturally occurring radiation from everyday items like ceramic tile and the dangerous enriched uranium. What's more, less than a quarter of the radiation devices needed to check all goods crossing U.S. borders have been installed, federal officials told the committee. Bethann Rooney, manager of security for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, testified that none of the cargo moving through the largest ship terminal or goods leaving the port by rail or barge are inspected for radiation. She added that the facility receives about 150 false alarms a day from its 22 radiation portal monitors. Rep. Bill Pascrell (D-N.J.) said he was worried that the high number of false alarms has prompted some agents to lower the sensitivity of the detectors, making them less effective in spotting real danger. The radiation detection systems installed across the U.S. are "quite limited in their capabilities and, in general, are insufficient to the task," said physicist Richard L. Wagner Jr., chairman of the Defense Department task force on preventing a clandestine nuclear attack. Said Rep. Pascrell: "I am not too hopeful about this situation." In a related development, a survey of experts predicted that the likelihood of an attack with a weapon of mass destruction somewhere in the world in the next 10 years could be as high as 70 percent. Most of the 85 experts who took part in the survey - commissioned by U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Richard Lugar - believe that one or two new countries will acquire nuclear weapons in the next five years, and as many as five will get them during the next decade. The survey found that the most significant risk of a WWD attack was from a radiological weapon, a so-called "dirty bomb" that combines radioactive material with a conventional explosive device. The next highest risk was an attack with a chemical or biological weapon, with a nuclear attack less likely, according to the experts, who included retired Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf and former CIA Director James Woolsey. The probability of an attack with any form of WMD was estimated at as high as 50 percent over the next five years, increasing to as high as 70 percent in 10 years. Editor's note: New book offers details of bin Laden's nuclear plans - Click Here Now CIA Translation of Secret Chinese Military Manual - Details Here Illegal immigration threatens our security and tears at the fiber of America - Click Here! Former CIA Director: Terrorist Strike Within U.S. Real Threat Kenneth R. Timmerman Tuesday, Aug. 7, 2007 Former CIA Director R. James Woolsey tells NewsMax in an exclusive interview that terrorists could strike the American homeland - possibly with a weapon of mass destruction - this summer or early fall. He also warns that if Iran fails to comply with international efforts to stop its nuclear weapons program, the U.S. will have no other option than to bomb it. "I think the threat of a serious attack in the next few months is very real," Woolsey said. A terrorist strike with a dirty bomb or with biological weapons was "a real possibility." Editor's Note: Special: 6 Days of Hell - The Coming War With Iran. Click here for more . ] Woolsey's comments echo those of FBI Director Robert Mueller, who told NewsMax in May that al-Qaida's paramount goal is clear: to detonate a nuclear device that would kill hundreds of thousands of Americans. Terrorists Plotting Now While Woolsey doubted terrorists would be able to acquire a nuclear explosive device, he warned that terrorists were trying to acquire one, either on the black market from the former Soviet Union, or from Iran or North Korea. The former CIA director said he favored "really tough sanctions" on Iran for another few months, but if that failed to bring Iran's nuclear weapons program to a halt, the United States had no other choice but to bomb Iran's nuclear sites. He also blasted those in the State Department who believe we can convince the Iranians through negotiations to stop their nuclear programs. "I've never thought there's a chance in hell of that," he said. Asked what three things we need to do to make America more safe, Woolsey said that the first and most important was not to tie the president's hands when it came to intelligence collection. Efforts by Democrats to require court orders to intercept international communications amounted to "shooting ourselves in the foot," he added. More Pressure on Iran Next, he said the United States absolutely must step up pressure on Iran, by focusing on Iran's weak economic underbelly and the wellspring of popular discontent with the regime. In the longer term, Woolsey said it was essentially that the U.S. beef up its military forces and to prepare Americans psychologically and politically for a long war with radical Islamic terrorists. "I think this is a long war, and we need to treat it as such, and go on a full war-footing," he said. Woolsey had plenty more to say on the topic of Iran, wrapping up the interview with a list of things needed to keep the United States safe. NewsMax: Everyone now seems to agree that Iran poses a threat to the United States. But opinions differ on what to do about it. Where do you stand in the Iran policy debate in Washington? Woolsey: I'm still in the camp, but probably only for a few more months, of those who want to try really tough sanctions. And I mean, doing everything we did to the Soviets in the Cold War, everything anybody could think of to undermine their economic system. Beginning right now, we need to work with those countries that sell refined oil products to them, such as gasoline and diesel, of which they import about 40 percent, to figure out how to get those stopped. We need broadcasting into Iran in the fashion we used to do on Radio Free Europe during the Cold War into Eastern Europe. I testified about these things last time nearly two years ago to a Senate committee, saying it was getting late. So I don't know if sanctions can work. But I believe there is a chance that really blocking their imports of gasoline and refined diesel would work, by bringing a lot of dissention from minority groups which are nearly half of the country, and from regular citizens, as happened a few weeks ago with Ahmadinejad's gas rationing and increase in gas prices. So I would still like to see us try that not half-heartedly but vigorously, and not be deterred at all by the threats and the other steps that they will take. Remember, the Persians invented chess. They're good at it. Their most valuable piece, their "queen" really, is their nuclear weapons program. Syria rises to the level of a rook, since that's a government. Hamas, Moqtada al-Sadr, Hezbollah, they're all pawns. Whether it was the war with Israel or what, they move their subordinate pieces around in such a way as to protect their queen. Once they have a nuclear weapon, the world changes in some extraordinarily unpleasant ways. So I believe that for a short time - I don't know if its four to five months, or a year, but it's surely not much longer than that - we can still try tough sanctions, and all the other steps - the right kind of broadcasting, and all the rest. And if that doesn't work, then we're in a situation where we have a choice of letting Iran have a nuclear weapon, or using force. And at that point, with great reluctance, just as I think he was reluctant to advocate it but has done so, I agree with John McCain. Force is the worst option except for one. And that is allowing Iran to have a nuclear weapon. NewsMax: The State Department seems to want to negotiate with Iran over Iran's support for Iraqi insurgents. Is this wise? Woolsey: I rarely flat oppose talking to adversaries, but the time you want to do it is when you have an edge over them, not they have an edge over you. I think that in spite of some recent military successes, the situation in Iraq is particularly difficult with the Maliki government, and with Moqtada Sadr on the whole relatively unconstrained, that they are relatively speaking in a stronger position than I would like to see for us to take any initiative in negotiations. It might have been different right after Baghdad fell, when clearly they were very worried. That would have been a good time, if one felt there was advantage to negotiations, to talk to them. But I am not confidant that we're not going to have any positive effect from these negotiations. NewsMax: Should the U.S. have seized what is being touted as an Iranian initiative in April 2003? Woolsey: I don't know how much of an initiative of theirs it was. I've heard stories about it. All I'm saying is that if you're going to negotiate with an adversary, the time to do it is when they are the demandeur, when they are feeling weak and you have just demonstrated strength. And April-May 2003 was such a time. NewsMax: Do you see any signs that the administration is preparing to take military action against Iran? Woolsey: I don't know and I wouldn't necessarily know. If one was going to use air power exclusively, which I think would be likely and appropriate, it would not necessarily be something that would take a huge amount of lead time. Probably two or three weeks, not two or three months. NewsMax: Some Navy people have suggested to me that we would get our carriers out of the Gulf first. Woolsey: That would be a possibility, because it's a constrained sea, and they have lots of small boats that could be used to attack with cruise missiles on them, and they have cruise missiles with a range to potentially be effective against U.S. naval forces in the Gulf, whereas the open ocean - the blue ocean - is our "Briar Patch," as in the Uncle Remus story. That's where we're at home and where we want to be. Certainly our carrier aircraft have the range along with B-52s and B-1s and B-2s to reach targets in Iran even if they're operating from the open ocean as distinct from the Gulf. So I'm leaving it up to the admirals and the secretary of defense where and when to put carriers. But my instinct would be that one would be better off in the open ocean with several carriers rather than have some stay in the Gulf. But there are weapons systems and tactics I may not be aware of. NewsMax: Do you see any signs that the Iranians are preparing to take military action against us? And how seriously should we take their threats? Woolsey: I think you want to listen particularly to what they say to one another. So their threats of destroying Israel, if they can, are as real as "Mein Kampf." Their potential to unleash Hezbollah, which is the world's most professional terrorist organization, much more capable really than al-Qaida or others, could conceivably do a lot of damage in the U.S. as well as various places abroad, including Iraq. I don't think that's something that should deter us if we have to take action to deter them from potentially having a nuclear weapon. NewsMax: The director of national Intelligence, Adm. McConnell, FBI Director Mueller, and the president have all warned that the terrorists want to strike us again here at home. How real is the threat of a WMD attack - possibly a nuclear attack - on the American homeland by terrorists? Woolsey: Well, I think the threat of a serious attack in the next few months is very real. It's what Mike McConnell and Mueller have said, and what Chertoff said about his gut feeling. A lot of people made fun of that, but I think that was a senior government official trying to communicate something without saying here's my evidence, because if he says that, he might have blown the source or method of intelligence. So I think various things that he and McConnell and Mueller and others have been saying all suggest that there's a real possibility - now I don't know which particular terrorist group - of something happening and possibly something very bad, late this summer or this fall. I think that unless al-Qaida or the Iranians have been able to obtain a loose old Soviet nuke, it's unlikely it could be a nuclear detonation. It might be possible they could get hold of other nuclear material, like cesium or strontium, which is much easier to get hold of, and have something like a dirty bomb. And certainly biological material, like anthrax, is much easier to produce and get hold of than fissionable material. And we don't know what the North Koreans might be willing to sell to Iran. They have essentially a joint ballistic missile development program; the Shahab and the Taepo Doing/No Dong are essentially the same missile, certainly with the same ranges. North Korea has several bombs worth of plutonium, but plutonium bombs are harder to construct than simple highly-enriched uranium bombs. We believe that it's possible that North Koreans had a HEU program, and at one point they seemed to admit it. But I don't know of any estimates of what they have or what they had. So if one's trying to think of a source of a bomb that terrorists, whether al-Qaida or Hezbollah, might be trying to get their hands on today, a nuclear weapon might be extremely difficult, unless they've been able to buy or otherwise obtain one of the old Soviet suitcase nuclear weapons. NewsMax: Do you think those are real? Woolsey: Certainly the Soviets had atomic demolition munitions that were relatively small - ours were smaller, I think. But each of us had ADMS that could easily be carried by one man. That was also true of some of the smaller nuclear artillery shells that existed. So it's not impossible that a terrorist group could try to get hold of a former Soviet relatively small nuclear warhead. NewsMax: Why do you think we've not been helping the pro-democracy groups inside Iran? Woolsey: I don't know. It's one of the things that we advocated in the committee on the present danger a couple of years ago, that I advocated to the Senate Homeland Security Committee nearly two years ago. I suppose it's because there are disagreements inside the U.S. government. Some people believe we can talk the Iranians out of their nuclear program. I've never thought there's a chance in hell of that. NewsMax: What are the three things we need to do to make America more safe? Woolsey: Well, the thing that we can do in the short order that is most important is not to cut back on our intelligence capabilities, whether it's through restricting the president's ability to intercept communications or otherwise. We know how to do that reasonably well and don't want to shoot ourselves in the foot by cutting back on it. The second thing are the steps we talked about with Iran, from broadcasting to cutting off their imports of gasoline and diesel and all the other financial and economic steps. Those would be the two in the really short order that would be on top of my list. Further down the line, I think we need a substantial increase in our military forces, in our overall national stance of going on a war-footing. I don't think this is just a law enforcement matter. I think this is a long war, and we need to treat it as such; and go on a full war-footing, from everything to making it easy for John Does to give alerts when they see the flying imams doing their thing, to working closely with allies in the Middle East, I think particularly with Israel. And a wide range of similar steps. Editor's note: Can America avoid a nuclear 'D-Day'? Get the INSIDE story - Click Here Now. Iran's Clerics Plan a Nuclear Showdown with the U.S. - Click Here! Homeland Security alert: You must have emergency radio Make your fortune in Sectors - avoid the S&P! Click Here Now Protect Your Brain from Alzheimer's, Parkinson's Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics: Homeland/Civil Defense Iran Nuclear Push WMD War on Terrorism Al-Qaida Plans Nuclear Attacks on 7 U.S. Cities http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/5/30/222555.shtml NewsMax.com Wires Thursday, May 31, 2007 The newly released book "The Day of Islam: The Annihilation of America and the Western World," (Prometheus Books) paints a frightening picture of al-Qaida's nuclear ambitions - one every American must read. Seasoned investigative reporter and former FBI consultant Paul Williams reveals the alarming potential for nuclear terrorism on U.S. soil and the sinister connections among organized crime, illegal immigrants, and al-Qaida. .] Recently, FBI Director Robert Mueller, in an interview with NewsMax, confirmed Williams' main claim. Mueller said al-Qaida's paramount goal is clear: to detonate a nuclear device that would kill hundreds of thousands of Americans. Mueller told NewsMax that at times, the threat feels so real he lies awake at night thinking about the prospect. Williams maintains that al-Qaida is not content on blowing up one nuclear device or even simply a "dirty" nuke - but wants to explode real nuclear devices in seven U.S. cities simultaneously. Williams says these cities are New York, Washington, D.C., Las Vegas, Miami, Boston, Houston, and Los Angeles. Mueller seems to confirm this claim of multiple attacks, saying both New York and Washington would be likely targets. Already Williams says the U.S. government has Washington webbed by "choke" points to detect nuclear material. For many Americans the threat of al-Qaida's nuclear ambitions begins in the time after the horrific 9/11 attacks. But as Williams shows so clearly, al-Qaida has been devising its nuclear plan since the early 1990s - and the U.S. government and other intelligence services have been well aware of al-Qaida's plan. For example, Williams quotes Michael Scheuer, a senior CIA official who headed the agency's bin Laden unit. Scheuer admitted the CIA "found that and al-Qaida were involved in an extraordinarily sophisticated and professional effort to acquire weapons of mass destruction - in this case, nuclear weapons; so, by the end of 1996, it was clear that this was an organization unlike any other one we had ever seen." Remember, Scheuer is describing the period before 9/11, proving again that bin Laden had been investing enormous time, resources, and money into getting nuclear weapons for more than 10 years. Bin Laden and his adherents believe this nuclear cataclysm will usher in "The Day of Islam," the dream of radical Muslims to see all of humankind fall in submission before the throne of Allah as the "Great Satan," America, is brought to her knees. Williams is not surprised at all that bin Laden has planned to launch such nuclear attacks, suggesting his delay is consistent with his past pattern of activities. For sure, it is a plan that has been long in its hatching. Based on the "forgotten testimony" of the FBI's "Confidential Source One," as well as other sources, Williams first presents evidence of bin Laden's purchase of highly enriched uranium in Sudan and nuclear devices from the Chechens and the Russian Mafia. He then offers further information on the workings of Pakistani scientists and technicians from the A.Q. Khan Research Facility to maintain and upgrade al-Qaida's "bespoke nukes" (with explosive yields in excess of 10 kilotons) for the "American Hiroshima." Williams explosive revelations are even more worrisome because they are not simply backed up by speculation and anonymous sources, they are sourced with government reports and comments made "on the record" by top officials. Among the explosive revelations in "The Day of Islam": In 1996, al-Qaida's "paymaster" and a top lieutenant for bin Laden walked into a U.S. embassy in Africa and spilled the beans on the terror group's activities - including that al-Qaida had purchased nuclear material in the Sudan The incredible story of a Brooklyn, N.Y., mosque that was receiving "stipends" from Uncle Sam for more than $2 million a year up until 1993 - when it was discovered the mosque was the nerve center for the first attack on the World Trade Center The fact that despite the hoopla about the war on terror, only one member of bin Laden's shura - or high command - has been killed The case of a Chicago charity that raised millions for bin Laden and even paid for one of his operatives whose sole job was to acquire nuclear weapons Evidence the Saudi intelligence service claims bin Laden has an arsenal of between 40 and 70 tactical nuclear weapons Russian sources that claim bin Laden bought 12 to 15 fully assembled nuclear weapons Ties between al-Qaida and the Chechen rebels who allegedly acquired nuclear suitcase devices Bin Laden's claim to a Pakistani journalist two months before 9/11 that acquiring nuclear was "not difficult" - claiming they were available from Russia for between $10 million and $20 million Author Tom Clancy's revelations he was "first bemused, then stunned" to find how easy it is for a wealthy person to develop a nuclear device equal to that dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki How atomic blueprints are available from Amazon.com! Evidence bin Laden spent between $60 and $100 million to build nuclear devices with the help of scientists from Pakistan, Russia, and China The damage even a low yield "junk" nuclear device would do to New York - with an estimated 250,000 dead in several days The remarkable story of two British secret agents who penetrated al-Qaida's camps in Afghanistan - and reported to Britain that the terror group was finishing work on radiological weapons The stunning admission of the head of Britain's MI5 who confirmed that "renegade" scientists had provided al-Qaida with the knowledge they needed to build a nuclear device New Jersey: the strange case of a Pakistani who died of radiological poisoning soon after 9/11, a man who had apparently served as a "mule" to transport the deadly material into the U.S. Axis of Evil: the secret alliance between al-Qaida and Iran that brings together two religious groups with one common goal: destroying the U.S. And much, much more Click Here Now .] In "The Day of Islam," Williams takes you on a virtual tour of al-Qaida and its global operations. You will discover their operations not only cross through Pakistan, Iran, Iraq, and other Muslim countries - but through Latin America, Mexico, and even our neighbor Canada! What emerges is a harrowing picture of international terrorist activities, all aimed at the destruction of the United States and the collapse of the Western world. Williams also reveals the man who has been tapped by bin Laden to lead the "Day of Islam" attack in the U.S. - a man who served as the "fixer" of 9/11 and yet has never been caught. He is believed to be here in the United States. This dangerous man has wormed his way into American culture: He speaks perfect English and passes himself off as an Italian American. He is "the most dangerous man in the world." FBI Director Mueller has called this man "the next Mohamed Atta" - but most Americans have never heard of him or seen his image. Williams expresses dismay that the FBI, well aware of this terrorist's threat, has not fully alerted the American public. Indeed, al-Qaida reportedly had 42 operatives as part of its 9/11 attacks, and some 23 remain as "sleepers" in the United States. Williams also reveals that al-Qaida's operations continue here in the United States, supported by supplies and personnel who simply slip through Mexico and across our porous border. Williams names names - including top al-Qaida operatives that have admitted that Mexico remains the main conduit point for al-Qaida penetration into the United States. This includes the smuggling of nuclear materials. "The Day of Islam" also offers a full translation of the "fatwa" - the religious order bin laden received in 2003 which "grants al-Qaida permission to kill 10 million Americans by way of nuclear weapons." For those who think that al-Qaida has been disabled, dismembered, or neutralized, the "Day of Islam" will provide a wake up call like never before. Editor's note: Get Paul William's explosive new book "The Day of Islam" FREE - Click Here Now . Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics: Al-Qaeda A Nuclear 9/11. It Could Happen. http://w3.newsmax.com/a/may10/ Al-Qaida is racing to acquire a nuclear device. They want to detonate it in an American city. A Newsmax report goes inside the effort to stop them. A Hiroshima-sized nuclear device smuggled into the U.S. inside a cargo container detonates in California's Port of Long Beach, killing 60,000 people instantaneously, exposing another 150,000 to deadly radiation, touching off massive fires and forcing the evacuation of 6 million panicked people in the Los Angeles basin. Could it happen? Top experts say it not only could happen, it is "more likely than not" to occur within the next several years. Last month the Obama administration admitted that al-Qaida is frantically trying to acquire a nuclear device. Now Newsmax magazine talks to some of the top experts in the U.S., including interviews with former CIA Director Gen. Michael Hayden and current FBI Director Robert Mueller. In Newsmax magazine's special report, "Nuclear D-Day," we take an in-depth look at the frightening and ever-growing threat of a nuclear attack orchestrated by terrorists or a rogue state like Iran. The report was written by New York Times best-selling author and Newsmax Contributing Editor Kenneth R. Timmerman, who was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2006 for his work exposing Iran's nuclear program. He warns that a nuclear strike against a high-profile American target remains the No. 1 goal of Islamic terrorists. And when they do strike, the experts say, America almost certainly will be grossly unprepared to handle it. You can also check out our FREE offer - the Emergency Radio - a $30 value and something every home must have. Go Here Now . This exclusive Newsmax report explores: The CIA's startling assessment about al-Qaida's nuclear plan Financial markets and more - the grave repercussions of a nuclear blast Bin Laden's "religious duty" to obtain a nuclear weapon Does Iran already have the bomb? Three broad ways terrorists can obtain a nuke Obama's "woeful" preparations for biothreats Iran's ominous ties with Chavez's Venezuela North Korea's growing nuclear capabilities A frightening number: 1,562 "confirmed incidents" of nuclear materials smuggling The "dirty bomb" threat against American cities Former CIA chief Michael Hayden's warning about al-Qaida and WMDs Fugitive Adnan Shukrijumah: "the next Mohamed Atta" Chilling claim: al-Qaida bought three suitcase bombs How Iran could conceal a nuclear test Why Obama's nuclear security summit was misguided Al-Qaida's attempt to bomb France The federal response plan that's called "a joke" Cheney: Interrogations prevented attacks after 9/11 The Nuclear Security Administration's impressive efforts overseas How terrorists could build a bomb in the U.S. "from scratch" Bipartisan commission: WMD attack by terrorists by 2013 Three rules for surviving after a nuclear blast And more Find out how you can get this report FREE - PLUS get an Emergency Radio worth almost $30 with our FREE offer. Go Here Now. China Is a Threat to America http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/3/14/133903.shtml Charles R. Smith Thursday, March 14, 2002 Chinese Weapons Development and Sales Are Directed Against the U.S. China is angry at the United States. The communist Chinese government unsuccessfully pressed the Bush administration to deny permission for Taiwan's defense minister, Tang Yiau-ming, to attend an arms conference in Florida. On Monday, Tang met with U.S. Deputy Undersecretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz while visiting the U.S. defense industry conference. As a result of that meeting, the communist Chinese are furious. "We express our strong dissatisfaction and indignation," stated Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Sun Yuxi. "We believe it will not only foster the arrogance of Taiwan independence forces, it will also damage Chinese-American relations and cross-strait ties," said Sun. Communist spokesman Sun also noted that China was "deeply shocked" by a recently declassified report that named China as one of six possible nations that could face nuclear strikes from America. Sun stated that China was seeking an "official" explanation of the report from Washington. Sun emphasized that China is a peace-loving nation. The U.S.-Chinese 'Bilateral Military Relationship' Many in the U.S. press, academia and political structure characterize China as our "strategic partner," a nation with similar goals and views as the United States. The U.S. policy of appeasement, that China is a peaceful giant, was documented in the official correspondence of Clinton Defense Secretary William Perry. In a 1995 letter to Chinese General Ding Henggao, U.S. Secretary of Defense Perry wrote that "advancing the military relationship between our two nations remains an objective which we agree serves the long-term interests of peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific Region." Perry wrote quite clearly that the Clinton administration wanted close ties to Beijing by "reiterating my support for our bilateral military relationship." Less than six months after Perry's offer for a "bilateral military relationship," the People's Liberation Army launched a simulated nuclear attack against the two largest cities in Taiwan. In 1996, the PLA Second Artillery Corps fired dummy missile warheads only a few miles off the Taiwanese coast. The 1996 missile crisis nearly started World War III. The Clinton administration had to respond to Beijing's threat to start a nuclear war in the Straits of Taiwan. Clinton's reaction was to send in the U.S. Navy and our aircraft carriers. Chinese Plans for Nuclear War With the U.S. The Chinese military took quick notice of the U.S. carriers, and in 1999 the communist army Office of the Central Military Command wrote a report on future nuclear combat with the United States. "China is not only a big country, but also possesses a nuclear arsenal that has long since been incorporated into the state warfare system and played a real role in our national defense," states the Chinese military commission report. "During last crisis across the Taiwan Straits, the U.S. tried to blackmail us with their aircraft carrier(s), but when their spy satellites confirmed that our four nuclear submarines which used to be stationed at Lushun Harbor had disappeared, those politicians addicted to the Taiwan card could not imagine how worried their military commanders were," notes the Chinese army report. "In comparison with the U.S. nuclear arsenal, our disadvantage is mainly numeric, while in real wars the qualitative gap will be reflected only as different requirements of strategic theory. In terms of deterrence, there is not any difference in practical value. So far we have built up the capability for the second and the third nuclear strikes and are fairly confident in fighting a nuclear war. The PCC has decided to pass through formal channels this message to the top leaders of the U.S. This is one of the concrete measures that we will take to prevent the escalation of war in the spirit of being responsible." Chinese General Wants to Nuke L.A. There is little question that China is "responsible" when it comes to nuclear war. Since 1996, the Chinese army has not stopped its acts of atomic-tipped aggression and intimidation. For example, two years after firing missiles at Taiwan, Gen. Xiong, then second in command of the People's Liberation Army, threatened to vaporize Los Angeles. Not once during the entire 40-year Cold War between the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. did any Soviet general threaten to vaporize an American city. It is certain that the Kremlin would have fired any officer who made such a statement, because of the threat to global peace. In contrast, Gen. Xiong remains second in command of the People's Liberation Army, ready to hurl his nuclear forces into battle with America on a moment's notice. According to the CIA, China is expected to continue its rapid deployment of ballistic missiles along the Chinese mainland, within striking distance of Taiwan. China's short-range ballistic missile arsenal could reach "several hundred" by the year 2005, stated Robert Walpole, a national intelligence officer, during a Senate hearing on international security. The CIA intelligence analyst also revealed that Beijing is working on three new intercontinental ballistic missiles, the Dong-Feng 31, a longer-range variant of the Dong-Feng 31, and the submarine-launched JL-2. The DF-31 and JL-2 both have an estimated range of over 7,000 miles and can shower the U.S. West Coast with nuclear warheads. Chinese Nuclear Weapons Proliferation In addition, the leaders in Beijing have taken every opportunity to export missile and nuclear warfare equipment to such nations as Iran, Pakistan and Iraq. The entire Pakistani atomic arsenal was built from scratch with the direct assistance of the Chinese military, including advanced nuclear warhead designs from PLA labs and nuclear-tipped missiles directly out of the Chinese army inventory. The "National Intelligence Estimate," a threat analysis published by the CIA, noted that Beijing has "enabled emerging missile states to accelerate development timelines for their existing programs" and sold "turnkey systems to gain previously non-existent capabilities - in the case of the Chinese sale of the M-11 short-range ballistic missile to Pakistan." In 2001, the U.S. lodged sanctions against the China Metallurgical Equipment Corp. after it continued to ship missile parts to Pakistan, violating Beijing's sixth promise to stop such exports. It should surprise no one that the People's Liberation Army owns China Metallurgical. During the 1990s, the Chinese army also exported an advanced air defense network to Iraq through another front company, in direct violation of the U.N. ban on military sales to Baghdad. The Bush administration openly complained about Chinese military sales to Iraq and eventually bombed several sites occupied by Chinese military engineers working for Saddam Hussein. "We raised earlier in the administration concerns about what might be going on with Iraq," stated Bush national security adviser Condoleezza Rice on Chinese missile proliferation. However, the Chinese army sales to Iraq have not stopped. PLA front companies continue to provide camouflage for Beijing as it attempts to export more advanced weapons to Iraq. For example, the harmless-sounding Shandong Arts and Craft Company is in fact a front for Chinese missile proliferation. In 2001, the firm acted as a cover for a PLA military delegation to Iraq seeking to sell advanced long-range missile technology to Saddam Hussein. China Is a Threat The China apologists in the United States assure us that the communist state is not a threat, that it is a peaceful nation prepared to take its place in the world. Their simplistic view of Chinese history omits the past 40 years of confrontation with America. They refuse to see Beijing's growing inventory of advanced missiles, warships and planes. They ignore years of espionage and covert political influence through contributions to U.S. political campaigns. They continue to seek appeasement despite the overwhelming evidence of missile and nuclear weapon proliferation. In the next 40 years, China will attempt to take its place among the world's superpowers. China's growing arsenal of advanced weapons will enable it to do so in a forceful and violent manner. It is time that we recognized what the People's Liberation Army already knows - that America is its No. 1 target. Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics: China/Taiwan Clinton Scandals Saddam Hussein/Iraq A product that might interest you: Find out the complete details of China's Military Buildup in "Bitter Legacy: NewsMax Reveals the Untold Story of the Clinton-Gore Years" Ex-spy Fears Sneak Russian Attack http://archive.newsmax.com/articles/?a=2000/1/25/70247 NewsMax.com January 25, 2000 By Stephan Archer LOS ANGELES - StanislavLunev, the highest-ranking Soviet spy ever to defect, warned members of Congress Monday a pre-emptive nuclear strike by Russia on American soil is a real possibility. At a House Committee on Government Reform hearing here, the one-time colonel in Soviet and then Russian Federation military intelligence, gave a chilling presentation of his country's Cold War plans to defeat the United States. Under federal witness protection, Lunev was escorted into the hearing room with a black bag covering his head. From behind a screen to shield him from the view of the audience, Lunev testified Soviet generals had designed a special plan for the future war against America and its allies in which special-operation forces commanders would come to the United States and other NATO countries a few days - maybe even a few hours - before actual war. Using weapons systems that had already been hidden at strategic points throughout the United States, he said, the Soviet generals would have demolished the country's political infrastructure by destroying strategic facilities and assassinating top military leaders such as the president and vice president just hours or minutes before a nuclear missile strike. Lunev said one of his espionage assignments had been to scout "drop sites" for weapons caches. He said he believes Russian military weapons are currently hidden in strategic points all across the United States and Europe for just such a purpose. Those hidden stockpiles of weapons would include portable nuclear devices, chemical and biological weapons, conventional weapons and incendiary devices, he said. Lunev told the panel the weapon caches could be used whenever the Russian commanders in charge are given the "go." He added that Russia is using Chechnya as a test battlefield for a future "real" war that may be with the United States and its allies. "Of course, you understand that this is history," Lunev told the congressional panel after describing the Soviet plan. "I need to tell you that history's history, but unfortunately, the current situation is not very good. "These military plans are still consistent with Russian generals, and these military plans in time of possible war would be fulfilled by special-operations forces commanders." Also present at the hearing was Rep. Dan Burton, R-Ind., chairman of the House Committee on Government Reform; Rep. Tom Campbell, R-Calif.; Curt Weldon, R-Pa.; Joe Scarborough, R-Fla.; Dr. William Green, political science professor for the national security studies program at California State University, San Bernardino; and former Central Intelligence Agency officer Peter Pry. Burton said, "Some members of the media are indicating we might be trying to create paranoia and a new Cold War. That's untrue. "I'm distressed that some members of the media think we're trying to scare everyone to death." Asked by reporters why he chose California for this hearing, Burton said, "It's my understanding that there are many potential targets for Russian sabotage in California. "California is the most populous state in the nation. If there are hidden caches of explosives in this state, that's very dangerous. That's why we're here." Campbell, who represents a district in this state, said, "There is a high likelihood of positioning weapons in California." Concerning the possibility of a first strike by Russian forces against the United States, Pry, formerly with the CIA, said the opportunity had presented itself numerous times during the 1980s and 1990s. For example, in 1995, he said, the West and Russia experienced a missile crisis "more dangerous than the 1962 Cuban missile crisis." Pry said that in January 1995, NASA and Norway, in a joint project, launched a meteorological rocket to study the aurora borealis, but the Russian Foreign Ministry never received notice of the launch due to a clerical error by an inexperienced staffer. As a result, Pry said, Russia almost launched its nuclear missiles aimed at the United States. Only then-President Boris Yeltsin, not believing the West would attack, held off the launch and waited to find out if the missile did, in fact, veer off course over the Russian mainland, Pry said. "Despite administration claims that our Russian policy is a success, many of us have watched and worried and warned for years that the Russian policy has careened toward failure," he said. "The administration's Russian policy has been more of a public-relations campaign to persuade the American people all is well rather than a hardheaded, bulleted program to really advance free enterprise and democracy in Russia and to protect U.S. vital national interests." Weldon said the Clinton administration has had a consistent pattern of not wanting anything to surface that might give the perception of a potential or real problem in the relationship between the United States and Russia, including the theft of International Monetary Fund dollars, abuse in insider trading in Russia and arms-control treaty violations. Although many questions regarding U.S. foreign policy with Russia are aimed at the Clinton administration, Weldon said, the hearing was not a "Republican witch-hunt." Burton observed that Rep. Henry Waxman, a Democratic member of the committee who represents a Los Angeles district and is a staunch defender of the Clinton administration, chose not come to the hearing. "I really regret the State Department isn't here today," Burton said. "They just jumped through hoops not to testify." Weldon said that in November of last year he introduced House Resolution 380, expressing concern over the location and removal of weapon caches placed in the United States by the Russian or Soviet governments. Sixteen Republicans and 16 Democrats signed the resolution. Even so, the administration has not asked the Russians for the specific location of the weapon stashes in the United States. Do these stashes pose a threat to Americans domestically? Campbell, speaking for his constituents in California, seems to think so. He said although he doesn't think the United States should back Russia into a corner, he believes the administration should ask Russia the tougher questions concerning the whereabouts of the weapon stashes. "I am a representative," said Campbell. "I am owed an answer." It has not been easy for Campbell to get one. On Dec. 6 of last year, Campbell wrote a letter requesting information about the location of Russian weapon caches in the United States to Clinton's National Security Adviser Sandy Berger, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright and Defense Secretary William Cohen. Only Cohen responded to Campbell's letter, on Dec. 16. In the letter Cohen said, "Thank you for your letter requesting information about the location of Russian weapon caches within the United States. I have asked the undersecretary of defense for policy, Mr. Walt Slocombe, to promptly address this request and he will get back to you as soon as possible." Campbell, upset by the brief response he received from Cohen, told NewsMax.com when push comes to shove a subpoena might be needed, but it was wise to try other means first. A Native Chinese on the China Dictators' World Conquest http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/1/19/90429.shtml Lev Navrozov Friday, Jan. 19, 2007 His name is Zhang Hongbao, and the Chinese dictatorship declared him to be a criminal, but he managed to escape from China to the United States, where he was recently "killed in a car accident." In 2005, "World Chinese Net" posted his essay: "The Chinese Communist Party's Post-Nuclear Super Weapons and Its Strategic Goal." Now, the CIA and other Western intelligence/espionage organizations are assumed to have been penetrating the dictatorship of China and studying this subject, along with Western professors of Sinology. And here I draw attention to a native Chinese. Yes, a native Chinese, without any degree or post, may know what the Western intelligence/espionage and academic sinology do not. When I, a native Russian, emigrated with my family to the United States in the early 1970s, I told The New York Times and the CIA that the Soviet dictatorship had been developing post-nuclear super weapons, which neither The New York Times nor the CIA would believe to be true for the next 20 years until Yeltsin, who needed peace for his reforms, did not exhibit in 1992 for international inspection the pre-1992 Soviet development of such super weapons. How could I know what the CIA and The New York Times refused to know for another 20 years? I was a native Russian, not a foreigner (such as a Western spy) in Russia to be kept off anything connected with Soviet military secrets. My wife was also a native Russian, and she became without any difficulty the editor of the Soviet edition of the international magazine "Nuclear Physics," under the auspices of the most important Soviet nuclear research institute, headed by Skobeltsin, the founder of Soviet nuclear physics, and staffed by internationally known Soviet nuclear physicists. As my wife told me, Skobeltsin had announced at a general meeting of his subordinates that his institute was to discontinue its nuclear research and to launch, instead, laser research, for example. It was obvious to me what was unknown to the CIA and The New York Times until 1992: the Soviet nuclear research had been succeeded by the development of post-nuclear super weapons. There is no need for a native to penetrate his or her country. He or she is part of it. Zhang Hongbao begins his essay with five major military technologies, and ironically, first comes laser technology, which the founder of Soviet nuclear physics mentioned as a field of research to succeed the nuclear weapons research in Soviet Russia. Zhang's next question (Page 3) is to be expected: "Who is really in control of China today?" Not a single leader or an emperor, but a "leaders group," a highly complex combination of power-holders. They threaten each other's power, but the cumulative power of them all is threatened by what Zhang calls a "full scale crisis." Politically, China "has a nascent human rights movement"; the influence of the democratic West and hence democratic demands "are stronger and more forceful than ever"; "religious forces are responding to the overseas religions of influence"; "unemployment is high"; "there is a large and impoverished peasant class"; "official greed and corruption are rampant"; "Taiwan, Xinjiang and Tibet are pushing for independence and they activate the underground forces." Every issue is like a sizzling blasting fuse on top of a mount of dry wood. The English translation of the old Chinese name of China, translated into English as "the Middle Kingdom," is more adequately translated by Zhang as "the Centre of the World." The only way out: back to the Center of the World! "This process is the process of conquering the United States and taking over the world." The job must be done by post-nuclear super weapons that have the following features: 1. One hit destroys the enemy beyond any possibility of enemy resistance 2. Maximum scale and speed of destruction 3. Destruction is traceless. Before the enemy learns about it, the enemy is dead 4. The goal is to wipe out the 2.6 billion inhabitants of the United States and 53 friendly and allied countries Is the above scenario realistic? Yes! As big as the elephant is it can be destroyed by a rat. For example, "if the power supply for the United States and its friendly and allied countries is suspended for one or two months (a power outage), the basic population of the United States and those countries (2.6 billion people) will be eliminated." The 21-page essay in 8-point type is signed: Zhang Hongbao Leisurely wrote in Los Angeles February 16th, 2005 Then follows a list of ranks of foreign top government the officials to whom Zhang Hongbao essay was to be delivered, and a list of the countries to which it was to be delivered. Still, Zhang Hongbao's essay of 2005 has been so far ignored. Finally, the telephone, fax, and e-mail of the sender: Department of National Military Strategic Research, China Shadow Government. * * * You can e-mail me at navlev@cloud9.net. Editor's note: Can America avoid a nuclear 'D-Day'? Get the INSIDE story - Click Here Now. Are We Safe From Nuclear Attack? http://archive.newsmax.com/adv/dec05/ Could terrorists smuggle a nuclear bomb through a U.S. port and explode it on American soil? Now that North Korea has nuclear devices - could they or terrorists they work with attack a major U.S. city? These and other questions are answered in a recent NewsMax Magazine special report "Avoiding Nuclear D-Day." This NewsMax report, authored by best-selling author Kenneth R. Timmerman, finds the threat is real -- and reveals what the U.S. government had done to stop such an attack. The NewsMax report reveals how high-tech gear and vigilance are protecting Americans from terrorist nuclear threats. This NewsMax report takes an in-depth look at how security measures in the U.S. have been completely overhauled since 9/11. You can get this report with our FREE offer and a $35 fleece jacket by Going Here . This blockbuster NewsMax report explores: True story: a chilling intel alert set off a frantic search for a nuclear warhead smuggled into the U.S. The inside facts about al-Qaida's attempts to acquire a "dirty bomb" that would unleash deadly radiation. Why a nuclear detonation in New York City is "everyone's worst nightmare." How the U.S. reacted when an intel report suggested New York was about to be hit with a nuclear device. How a powerful gamma-ray device can scan cargo cartons - without opening them. Why President Bush chose Michael Chertoff as the new Homeland Security Secretary. The "rogues gallery" of potential nuclear players - more than just bin Laden threaten our cities. Terrorists' potential points of entry: 3,700 terminals, 301 ports. The "suitcase nuke" - real or hoax? How 2002's Container Security Initiative is "pushing the borders outward." The new large X-ray screening machine that can "see" through 16 inches of solid steel - we have some of the first pictures of these devices. Why terrorists need a scenario with "zero risk." How a new security chief revamped the Port of Baltimore. Why Ed Koch believes we are in a "war of civilizations." The B-54 - America's one-man, 58-pound nuclear weapon. How the Coast Guard went to sea to head off a suspected nuclear attack on New York. And much, much more. This special edition of NewsMax Magazine features an exclusive interview with Customs and Border Commissioner Robert Bonner, who counters claims that his detection strategy is a "dead end" and says: "We've proven that you can risk-manage the terrorist threat." Find out how you can get this report FREE. Go Here Now . Nuclear Terrorist Linked to JFK Plot http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/6/4/101321.shtml?s=lh Monday, June 4, 2007 10:07 a.m. EDT Last Thursday, NewsMax.com featured an in-depth story on a little-known name in the terrorist underworldwho nevertheless has been called the most wanted man in America because of his efforts to explode nuclear devices. Now Monday's New York Post is reporting in a Page-One cover story that this same man is the suspected "invisible hand" behind the plot to bomb a fuel pipeline feeding New York's JFK airport. This terrorist is Adnan el-Shukrijumah, the so-called "Fixer" behind the 9/11 attacks. He is perhaps the most dangerous man in the world because a stunning new book, "The Day of Islam: The Annihilation of America and the Western World," by a former FBI consultant reveals that this man is leading al-Qaida's scheme to detonate nuclear devices in several U.S. cities. .] The Post calls el-Shukrijumah the "so called nuclear-whiz kid" - a "tantalizing terror figure" with a $5 million bounty on his head. According to the paper, el-Shukrijumah was "the radical big shot investigators hoped to snag in their 18-month JFK-plot probe." The Post also confirmed that he is same man Osama bin Laden has tapped to hatch the terror group's nuclear plan in the U.S. According to law enforcement sources, el-Shukrijumah's name surfaced several times during the FBI's surveillance of the JFK plotters' phone conversations. Three of the JFK plotters were natives of Guyana, as was Adnan. The Guyana connection caused raised eyebrows among U.S. investigators. One law enforcement source told the Post that Adnan was "always in the shadows." The U.S. was allowing the JFK plot to continue in hopes of snatching el-Shukrijumah, but had to make arrests when one of the conspirators planned to fly from Trinidad to Venezuela, where the U.S. has no extradition rights. Thursday's NewsMax story, based on Paul L. Williams' "The Day of Islam: The Annihilation of America and the Western World" book, included this warning from the author: "No one on planet earth is more of a threat to the lives and well-being of every man, woman, and child within the United States than ferret-faced el-Shukrijumah." As the story disclosed, Williams has compiled evidence that bin Laden designated el-Shukrijumah to arrange a simultaneous nuclear attack on seven U.S. cities - New York, Washington, Los Angeles, Houston, Miami, Boston, and Las Vegas. el-Shukrijumah is now believed to be operating within the U.S. .] China/Russia Deploy New Missiles http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/11/8/13331.shtml Charles R. Smith Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2001 Chinese missiles can reach U.S. with nuclear warheads. U.S. defense officials have confirmed that China is preparing to test a new missile capable of delivering nuclear warheads directly to the United States. The Chinese Army Second Artillery Corps is preparing to test its new Dong Feng 31, or "East Wind," ICBM during the next few days. The DF-31 reportedly can carry a single 3-megaton H-bomb or three 90-kiloton nuclear warheads. The missile has an official range of over 4,800 miles. The Dong Feng 31 reportedly is equipped with U.S. missile and warhead technology that was obtained by China through espionage and legal and illegal technology transfers from the Clinton administration. It is expected that the Chinese army will declare the DF-31 operational within the next 12 months. Chinese Navy Missile The new PLA long-range weapon test comes only days after a Chinese navy test of a similar submarine-launched nuclear-tipped missile. The China navy test of a Julang 2, or "Great Wave," missile took place three weeks ago in an area located off the coast of north central China. U.S. intelligence sources recorded a "pop-up" test of the JL-2 from a specially modified Chinese Golf-class diesel submarine. The test simulated the first step in a submarine-launched ballistic missile firing by ejecting the missile from its tube. In an actual launch, the missile's engine would be ignited after clearing the submarine. The Chinese navy plans to deploy the JL-2 missile aboard China's newest ballistic missile submarine, known as the Type 094. The Chinese navy reportedly will take command of the first JL-2-equipped Type 094 submarine in the next 12 months. "From open sources, one cannot assess the real range of the JL-2," noted Richard Fisher, a senior fellow and defense analyst at the Jamestown Foundation. "Most sources note it is the sea-borne counterpart to the DF-31, which is credited with a 8,000 km (4,800 mile) range. However, there is some unconfirmed reporting that the JL-2 may have longer range." U.S. Navy sources expressed concern that a JL-2-armed submarine could sail to within a few hundred miles of the U.S. West Coast. Such a move would place West Coast cities at "point-blank" range, enabling the Chinese submarine to shower Los Angeles or San Francisco with nuclear warheads. The move would also place most - if not all - U.S. cities within range of the H-bomb-equipped missile. "It is likely that the goal for the JL-2 is to be able to reach the western U.S. from the Yellow Sea, an area that the PLA can defend with near-current ship and aircraft resources. But of course, if the Type 094 SSBN is able to reach launch points outside this area, the JL-2's reach will increase," stated Fisher. "India also fears this new SLBM, as it expects that the PLA will produce enough Type 094 SSBNs to pose a credible second strike presence in the Indian Ocean," noted Fisher. New Russian Missile The Chinese missile tests are taking place at the same time Russia is trying to sell a new supersonic land attack missile. Russian missile maker NPO Mashinostroyenia announced in October that it was introducing a new version of the SS-N-26 Yahont cruise missile. The Yahont ramjet-powered missile can reach targets up to 162 nautical miles away at speeds in excess of 1,500 miles an hour. The Yahont was originally designed to be an anti-ship attack missile, but NPO Mash is now offering a new version called the Yahont-M that can strike land targets with "extreme accuracy." The deadly Yahont missile is being offered for sale to Iran, India and China. The missile can be air-launched, sea-launched or even launched from a submerged submarine through a torpedo tube. The Yahont reportedly flies at treetop level at a blistering speed of over 2.6 times the speed of sound. NPO Mash is offering the Yahont-M in combination with the Kondor-E targeting satellite. Russian officials are offering to sell high-resolution satellite data to program the Yahont missile for land targets or even turn over a complete Kondor-E satellite with a radar designation targeting system. The space-based targeting combination is being offered for export "to countries that lack the over-the-horizon targeting capability" required to operate the Yahont. China and Iran in Space U.S. officials are concerned because China reportedly may arm newly-purchased Russian navy vessels with the deadly Yahont missile. While China may not elect to purchase the Kondor-E satellite, it can easily modify a newly-developed SMMS imaging satellite to supply the same space-based targeting information. According to U.S. defense officials, China and Iran are jointly developing the SMMS, or small multi-mission spacecraft. The 1,034-lb. satellite will carry a low-resolution CCD camera and telecommunications systems. Iranian space engineers were in Beijing in September reviewing progress on the joint space satellite program. The SMMS satellite is scheduled for launch in 2004 atop a Chinese booster rocket. China already has a mature medium resolution space imaging satellite program. However, the SMMS will allow the PRC and Iran to improve missile targeting and autonomous military reconnaissance. China has reportedly also offered similar military satellite capabilities to Pakistan. Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics: China/Taiwan Russia Middle East Missile Defense A product that might interest you: Adm. Moorer Warns: China Plans War! Unrestricted Warfare: China's Master Plan to Destroy America Softcover ISBN: 0-9716807-2-8 By Colonels Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui Introduction by Al Santoli As incredible as it may be to believe, four years before the Sept. 11 bombing of the World Trade Center a Chinese military manual titled Unrestricted Warfare touted such an attack - suggesting it would be difficult for the U.S. military to cope with. Here is an excerpt from Unrestricted Warfare: "Whether it be the intrusions of hackers, a major explosion at the World Trade Center, or a bombing attack by bin Laden, all of these greatly exceed the frequency bandwidths understood by the American military..." Surprisingly, Osama bin Laden is mentioned frequently in this book. Now NewsMax.com is making the CIA translation of this shocking book available to all Americans. On Sept. 11, 2001, Americans and the world witnessed one of the most horrific acts ever to take place on American soil. Our media and government were quick to declare the acts of that day as simply terrorism by a nationless group known as al-Qaeda. In reading China's military manual Unrestricted Warfare , you will learn that the events of Sept. 11 were not a random act perpetrated by independent agents. Instead, Chinese military planners believe that terrorism is just one of the many tools at the hands of nations and their terrorist allies to wage total war against the United States. You will be surprised to learn: The two PLA colonels who authored Unrestricted Warfare have been hailed as heroes in China since Sept. 11 The Chinese state-run propaganda machine is cashing in on the terror attacks ... producing books, films and video games glorifying the strikes as a humbling blow against an arrogant nation. Chinese Communist Party officials are saying that President Jiang Zemin has obsessively and gleefully watched and re-watched pictures of the aircraft crashing into the World Trade Center. The CIA's own translation agency reported that this book identifies the U.S. as China's main enemy, and details how a weak nation can destroy America using unorthodox attacks - like the 9-11 attacks. China is preparing itself and encouraging others to engage the U.S. in total war. The book is chock full of plans and strategies, from using computers, to smuggling illegal immigrants, to manipulating the stock markets, to influencing the U.S. media, to using weapons of mass destruction - all to destroy America. Recent press reports indicate that China has assisted and continues to assist militarily and economically the Taliban and al-Qaeda - even after Sept. 11. The doctrine of total war outlined in Unrestricted Warfare clearly demonstrates that the People's Republic of China is preparing to confront the United States and our allies by conducting "asymmetrical" or multidimensional attacks on almost every aspect of our social, economic and political life. The media and Congress are keeping a lid on this book because of the implications of U.S.-China economic and trade relations. But now you can bypass them by getting a copy yourself! Here's what others say about Unrestricted Warfare: "You need to read Unrestricted Warfare because it reveals China's game plan in its coming war with America.. ... China thinks it can destroy America by using these tactics." Adm. Thomas Moorer Former Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff "The 9-11 attacks may just be the beginning. Many terrorist nations and groups will try to imitate this operation ... and China's war book Unrestricted Warfare will be their text." Maj. Gen. John K. Singlaub Former Chief of Staff, US Forces Korea " Unrestricted Warfare is evidence linking China to 9-11. It is also their plan for global operations against America." Wilson C. Lucom Endwar.com To purchase the book, click: NewsMax.com - America's News Page . Unrestricted Warfare REVIEWS from AMAZON Customers 57 of 68 people found the following review helpful: It's all true and the truth does hurt., March 2, 2004 By U2pop "u2pop" (Atlanta) - See all my reviews This is a padded edition with more hype on terrorism and fear than necessary. The original text by Lang and Xiangsui is a fascinating look at the true weaknesses of the American military system. It is with this book that China identifies America as its sole predominate enemy. I fully believe and support our military in any and all of its endeavors. However the book correctly points out, among other things, that the US has an obsession with human casualties. It is because of this that wars are fought from a distance, with technology, in order to minimize casualties. This is something that is very evident to anyone who's looked at the American military's history. From World War 2 to Desert Storm II, the increased use of technology and the public outcry over casualties has increased ten fold. This book, correctly so, advances the theory that in the event of a war between China and America, there will be an unconventional war sorts or rather "the war will be fought an won in a war beyond the battlefield" using terrorism, financial institutions, computer hackers, among many others. The sale of this book is mainly a money making scheme since the CIA translation is available for free all over the internet. On the other hand, this is an excellent book for any foreign policy enthusiast, but more importantly, for those military intelligence analysts who we hope are reading it. This is what China really thinks and the truth really does hurt. Seven prophetic visions seen by William Branham in 1933 In June of 1933 , while preparing for a two-week tent meeting in Jeffersonville Indiana, William Branham experienced a series of 7 prophetic visions. William Branham said: The Lord Jesus spoke to me and said that the coming of the Lord was drawing nigh, but that before He came, seven major events would transpire. I wrote them all down and that morning I gave forth the revelation of the Lord. The following is a summary of the seven visions and links to more detailed analysis of the fulfilment of each of these prophecies: 1) Mussolini would invade Ethiopia, and later come to a shameful demise. 2) Adolph Hitler would start the Second World War, and come to a mysterious end. 3) Facism and Nazism would be swallowed up into Communism, and Russia would emerge from the U.S.S.R. 4) Science would advance to the point where cars would no longer require drivers. 5) American morals would pervert and decline considerably. 6) A beautiful, but cruel, woman would rise to great power in the United States. 7) America would be reduced to debris, craters, and smoke. Destruction of Los Angeles From BelieveTheSign Jump to: navigation , search The Biltmore Hotel, Downtown Los Angeles, where William Branham prophecied that Los Angeles would roll into the sea. William Branham had just finished preaching a series of meetings in Los Angeles in April 1965, when he was asked bythe Full Gospel Business Men who organized the meetings to preach just one more service for them. So, on April 29, William Branham stood behind the podium at the Biltmore Hotel in Los Angeles,and preached a sermon called "Choosing of a Bride". Two notable things occurred during this service: 1. There was a steady stream of people leaving the building during the service who could not handle the severity of the preaching. These included the same people who had attended (and engaged in) William Branham's sermons in LA since April the 24th. 2. During this sermon, William Branham prophecied that the city of Los Angeles would one day slide into the ocean, and a new coastline would form at the Salton Sea. Recent Significant L.A. Earthquakes Date March 16, 2010 January 17, 1994 October 1, 1987 February 9, 1971 March 10, 1933 Epicenter Pico Rivera (10 miles SE) Reseda (20 miles NW) Rosemead (8 miles E) Sylmar (24 miles NW) Long Beach (20 Miles S) Strength 4.4 6.7 5.9 6.6 6.4 The Honeycomb and the Sandbar Signal Hill, May 1, 1923: Oil extraction honeycombing the oilsands Los Angeles is one of the largest cities in the world. It is also one of the only cities in the world with significant active oil extraction within city limits. The sediment in the Los Angeles basin is up to 6 miles (10 km) deep, and includes the following oil fields: Long Beach Oil Field Los Angeles City Oil Field Wilmington Oil Field (3rd largest oil field in the U.S.) Huntington Beach Oil Field Torrance Oil Field Beverly Hills Oil Field Combined with the danger of existing fault lines that Los Angeles sits on, the potential for a devestating natural disaster is scientifically plausible. Time Magazine recorded the partial sinking of Long Beach in the 1950s, blaming the cause on excessive drilling in the area. Since that time, oil producers have been pumping water into the earth to replace the oil they extract. The only problem with this process is that water has different properties than oil, as residents of Daisetta, Texas learned in 2008 when the walls of an underground salt-cave (from which oil brine had been extracted) disolved, creating a sink-hole 900 feet wide by 260 feet deep. Between 1932 and 1960 iodine was harvested from oil brine extracted in the Los Angeles basin - raising the question of whether the water being pumped into the earth is currently disolving structural minerals under Los Angeles. One problem with subsistence (the sinking of land) is that it can create megatsunamis if they occur near water. History records the following megatsunamis created by landslides: 365 AD - 100ft waves hit Alexandria after an earthquake off Crete. 1792 AD - 330ft waves killed 15,000 villagers when parts of Mount Unzen, Japan slid into the sea. 1958 AD - 1,720ft waves destroyed Lituya Bay, Alaska, after an earthquake caused a landslide. And, of course, the Salton Sea is about two hundred feet below sea level, and if that big churning, that earth swallowing in like that, with hundreds of square miles, hundreds and hundreds of square miles sinking into the earth, that'll throw a tidal wave plumb to Arizona. (Sermon:Ashamed of Him, Jeffersonville, Indiana, July 11, 1965) And every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand (Matthew 7:26) America in Ashes From BelieveTheSign Jump to: navigation , search February 2, 2011 Update The U.S. and Russia sign a new START treaty, limiting each countries nuclear warheads and launchers, and allowing each country to visually inspect the other country's weapons. BBC Online In June 1933 , William Branham experienced a series of 7 prophetic visions. In the seventh and final vision there was an explosion, and the nation of America was turned into ashes from coast to coast. Soon after, on September 12, 1933, Le'oSzil'ard conceived of the idea of the nuclear chain reaction while waiting for a red light in Bloomsbury, England. This vision has yet to be fulfilled. The Prophecy The last and seventh vision was wherein I heard a most terrible explosion. As I turned to look I saw nothing but debris, craters, and smoke all over the land of America. 'Laodicean Church Age Book", Chapter 9, William Branham William Branham's suggestions on the Method and Motive of America's Destruction I want to ask you something. They claim that this new hydrogen bomb... And that's the only ones we know of. We don't know what they got back the sleeve. But they can stand in Moscow, Russia, and time a bomb right on this building by the stars, and guide it by radar, and got them placed to every major nation, and every major city in the world. Just pull on a string, and there she goes. Somebody's going to drink too much vodka one day; there it'll be. Sermon: A Greater Than Solomon Is Here, Bloomington, IL, April 12, 1961. When God sends a gift to the people and they'll recognize it, it's always a golden age. But when they refuse it, there's nothing left but a chaos for that generation. Now, listen closely. If God had sent the Holy Spirit in this age for a sign, and we reject It, there's nothing left but a destruction. But if we refuse it, we'll sure to be blowed off the earth. The atomic bombs are hanging ready now, each one afraid to pull the trigger.But someday, they'll have too much vodka and press the trigger. And when that--that bomb passes through that radar, sound... When it goes through there, there'll be others go the other way. And you know what will take place? The world can't stand it. ...Before that can happen, the Church will be gone. Sermon: The Queen of Sheba, Tifton, GA, January 10, 1960. Today's Recipe For Disaster America's Enemies In the process of trying to create peace and stability for herself and other nations, the United States has become a common target of hatred of various movements and governments aroung the world. Newspapers today are filled with articles on the United States and her involvement in foreign wars, and coverage of the negative local response to such involvement. With many countries possessing or developing nuclear technology and advanced delivery systems, it's not hard to imagine the devestation and destruction that might occur if irresponsible agression materialized. Recent Disasters Oklahoma City Bombing 9/11 - New York in Ashes New Orleans & Hurricane Katrina Past Updates Sept. 17, 2009: Obama shelves Europe missile plan. BBC Online

Dual citizenship has allowed Israeli citizens to run the highest offices of government in the United States of America

givemeadamnname — Fri, 22 Feb 2013 01:17:24 -0500

Dual Citizenship -- Loyal to Whom? by Dan Eden Please also see Omert Humiliates America and Who Controls Hollywood and the Media? .Someone wrote and asked me, "Why are there Israeli- but not Mexican-American Dual Nationals?" Well, here's my take on this. I'd also like your views and opinions. Before I begin I'd like to day something important. There is a new law -- the so-called "Hate Speech" law, that just passed the House and is expected to pass the Senate and become law very soon. It was originally designed to guard against discrimination of oppressed minorities but was soon recognized as a way for Israel to forever end any criticism of the state of Israel and Zionism. When it is law, this page, and many like it will be deleted from the internet as yet another mile marker of the infringement of truth and free speech by certain dual-nationals at the expense of true and patriotic Americans. Enough said. Unless we are Native American Indians, all Americans have their origins in some other country. Both of my parents were from England. They were proud to be "British" but they were most proud of achieving their American citizenship. Sure, we had pictures of the Queen and nick-nacks with the Union Jack on them. My mother even celebrated the traditional 4 o'clock tea time and was good at making Yorkshire Pudding. In the late 60's my older brother served in the US Army and did his tour in Viet Nam. When it came down to "allegiance," we were all patriotic Americans. Period. The word "allegiance" means that we promise loyalty. It also carries with it the expectation that this loyalty will be exclusive and unrestrained. In the case of a declared war or real threat or conflict, for example, our allegiance to America should preclude any other interest, be it another country or political ideology. When they took their oath to become American citizens, my parents had to pledge their "allegiance" exclusively to America and renounce their allegiance to "any and all foreign governments." That included Great Britain, one of our strongest allies. Before Viewzone asked me to research the meaning of "dual citizenship," I had never heard of the term. How could someone be a citizen of two countries at the same time? But I was just ignorant. Dual nationalities and citizenships are quite common. From my internet research, I learned that in 1997, a French Canadian with a U.S. passport ran for mayor of Plattsburgh, N.Y. He argued that the incumbent spoke French too poorly to be running a city so close to Quebec. He lost. Also in 1997, a retired top American official for the U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) ran for president of Lithuania. He was inaugurated in February to a burst of fireworks! In 1996, Dominicans from New York not only could vote in the Dominican Republic's presidential elections for the first time, they could vote for a fellow New Yorker. Multiple nationalities have become so commonplace that some analysts fear the trend is undermining the notion of nationhood, particularly in the place with the most diverse citizenry on Earth: the United States. Debate over the issue intensified in the late 1990s, when Mexico joined the growing list of poor nations that say it's OK for their nationals to be citizens of the countries to which they have migrated. Under the law that took effect in 1998 Mexicans abroad -- most of them in the United States -- will be able to retain Mexican citizenship even if they seek U.S. citizenship. And naturalized Americans of Mexican descent will be able to reclaim their original citizenship. The Mexican government stopped short, for now, of giving expatriates the right to vote. Security Issues Since citizenship carries with it a responsibility to be exclusively loyal to one country, the whole concept of dual citizenship and nationality raises questions about which of the dual citizenships have priority. This is extremely important when the two countries have opposing interests. It can be a deadly problem when a dual citizen is in a high position within our American government. Can one imagine a Japanese citizen serving in the Pentagon during WWII? Or how about a citizen of the Soviet Union holding a cabinet position in the White House during the Cold War? Today's conflicts are centered in the Middle East. America needs to balance foreign policies towards oil producing Arab nations with our goal being peace and stability in the region. This places a burdon on our government to be even-handed in our dealings with the Arab world and Israel. While the Iraq War was waged on lies about Weapons of Mass Destruction and revenge for 911, the real reason has emerged as a well designed global plan to improve the power and leverage of Israel. Added to this policy is yet another potential blow to American interests and security -- the impending War with Iran. This war will be waged for the security of Israel and will be paid for by the blood of American soldiers and the hard-earned money of American citizens whose quality of life is inversely tied to the cost of petrolium. Recently, in their much lauded paper, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy , Harvard professor, Stephen Walt, and University of Chicago professor, John Mearsheimer, focused attention on the strong Israeli lobby which has a powerful influence over American foreign policies (see BBC article ). They detail the influence that this lobby has exerted, forming a series of international policies which can be viewed as in direct opposition to the interests and security of the American people. These acts and policies are more often than not carried out by US government appointees who hold powerful positions and who are dual American-Israeli citizens. Since the policies they support are often exclusively beneficial to Israel, often to the detriment of America, it has been argued that their loyalties are misdirected. A few classic examples can be cited here. Jonathan Jay Pollard was an American-Israeli citizen who worked for the US government. He is well known because he stole more secrets from the U.S. than has any other spy in American history. During his interrogation Pollard said he felt compelled to put the "interests of my state" ahead of his own. Although as a U.S. Navy counter-intelligence specialist he had a top-secret security clearance, by "my state" he meant the state of Israel. Literally tens of thousands of Americans holding U.S. passports admit they feel a primary allegiance to the state of Israel. In many instances, these Americans vote in Israeli elections, wear Israeli uniforms and fight in Israeli wars. Many are actively engaged both in the confiscation of Palestinian lands and in the Israeli political system. Three examples come to mind: One is Rabbi Meir Kahane , who founded the militant Jewish Defense League in the U.S. in the 1960s, then emigrated to Israel where, eventually, he was elected to the Knesset. Until he was shot and killed at one of his U.S. fund-raising rallies in 1990, the Brooklyn-born rabbi shuttled between Tel Aviv and New York, where he recruited militant American Jews for his activities in Israel against Palestinians. He claimed to be a "dual citizen" of America and Israel. Another Jewish American, James Mahon from Alexandria, Virginia, reportedly was on a secret mission to kill PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat when he was shot in 1980 by an unknown assailant. When he was shot, Mahon held an American M-16 in his hand and a U.S. passport in his pocket . Then there was Alan Harry Goodman , an American Jew who left his home in Baltimore, Maryland, flew to Israel and served in the Israeli army. Then, on April 11, 1982, armed with an Uzi submachine gun, he walked, alone, to Al-Aqsa, Jerusalem's most holy Islamic shrine, where he opened fire, killing two Palestinians and wounding others. Both the U.S. and Israeli governments played down the incident, as did the media. Most recently, US Navy Petty Officer, Ariel J. Weinmann , while serving at or near Bahrain, Mexico, and Austria, "with intent or reason to believe it would be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of a foreign nation (Israel), to communicate, deliver or transmit classified CONFIDENTIAL and SECRET information relating to the national defense, to a representative, officer, agent or employee of a foreign government." Weinmann was apprehended on March 26 after being listed as "a deserter by his command," according to the US Navy. The information he gathered was supplied to Israel. Ben-Ami Kadish , a Connecticut-born U.S. dual citizen who worked in New Jersey was arrested and charged with giving top secret nuclear information and details about the US Patriot Missile to an Israeli agent -- the same agent involved with the Jay Pollard case. The espionage charges reportedly stem from acts committed in the 1980s. These activities, like the ones with convicted spy Pollard, were immediately denied by Israel (Pollard pleaded guilty in 1986). It is further reported that Israeli officials instructed Kadish to lie to US investigators. Kadish was scheduled to be arraigned on April 22, 2008 at U.S. District Court in Manhattan. In 2009 it was revealed that the NSA had secretly taped conversations of Congresswomen Jane Harman negotiating with two AIPAC spies accused of giving sensitive information about US military activities to the Israeli government. In the taped conversation she is being asked to dismiss their espionage charges in return for large politiacl contributions and (are you ready) a chairmanship of the US Intelligence Committee! One has to assume that they thought they could actually "arrange" for this to happen. This information was secretly revealed by the NSA to Nancy Polosi prior to the selection of the committee chairman and was a factor (let's hope, anyway) in Harmon's failure to obtain this highly sensitive position. After all was said and done, however, the case against the two Israeli lobbyists was dismissed -- against the insistance of the FBI. No satisfactory reason has been given for this.Unfortunately, such an act of treason remains unchallenged and Jane Harman remains at her congressional job and enjoys being the third wealthiest member of Congress. Only in America! The examples of Kahane, Mahonm, Goodman and Weinmann raise the question of when a U.S. citizen ceases to be, or should cease to be, a U.S. citizen. U.S. Law at one time clearly stated that an American citizen owed first allegiance to the United States. A U.S. citizen should not fight in a foreign army or hold high office in a foreign country without risking expatriation. What the heck happened? The 1940 Nationality Act Section 401 (e) of the 1940 Nationality Act provides that a U.S. citizen, whether by birth or naturalization, "shall lose his nationality by...voting in a political election in a foreign state." This law was tested many times. In 1958, for instance, an American citizen named Perez voted in a Mexican election . The case went to the Supreme Court, where the majority opinion held that Perez must lose his American nationality . The court said Congress could provide for expatriation as a reasonable way of preventing embarrassment to the United States in its foreign relations. But then something very odd happened. In 1967 an American Jew, Beys Afroyim received an exemption that set a precedent exclusively for American Jews. Afroyim, born in Poland in 1895, emigrated to America in 1912, and became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 1926. In 1950, aged 55, he emigrated to Israel and became an Israeli citizen. In 1951 Afroyim voted in an Israeli Knesset election and in five political elections that followed. So, by all standards he lost his American citizenship -- right? Wrong. After living in Israel for a decade, Afroyim wished to return to New York. In 1960, he asked the U.S. Consulate in Haifa for an American passport. The Department of State refused the application, invoking section 401 (e) of the Nationality Act -- the same ruling that had stripped the American citizen named Perez of his U.S. citizenship. Attorneys acting for Afroyim took his case to a Washington, DC District Court, which upheld the law. Then his attorneys appealed to the Court of Appeals. This court also upheld the law. The attorneys for Afroyim then moved the case on to the Supreme Court. Here, with Supreme Court Justice Abe Fortas, Lyndon Johnson's former attorney and one of the most powerful Jewish Americans, casting the swing vote, the court voted five to four in favor of Afroyim. The court held that the U.S. government had no right to "rob" Afroyim of his American citizenship! The court, reversing its previous judgment as regards the Mexican American, ruled that Afroyim had not shown "intent" to lose citizenship by voting in Israeli elections. Huh? While Washington claims it has a "good neighbor" policy with Mexico, the U.S. does not permit Mexicans to hold dual nationality. The US makes them become either U.S. or Mexican -- you can't be both. But the U.S., in its special relationship with Israel, has become very sympathetic to allowing Israeli-Americans to retain two nationalities and allowing U.S. citizens not only to hold public office in Israel, but to hold US government positions as well! No other country holds this special exception to our laws of citizenship. So, you might ask, are there any other dual Israel-American citizens who hold US government positions that could compromise American security? Yes. Consider the following list that I obtained on the web: Michael Mukasey Recently appointed as US Attorney General. Mukasey also was the judge in the litigation between developer Larry Silverstein and several insurance companies arising from the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9/11/2001. Michael Chertoff Former Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division, at the Justice Department; now head of Homeland Security. Richard Perle One of Bush's foreign policy advisors, he is the chairman of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board. A very likely Israeli government agent, Perle was expelled from Senator Henry Jackson's office in the 1970's after the National Security Agency (NSA) caught him passing Highly-Classified (National Security) documents to the Israeli Embassy. He later worked for the Israeli weapons firm, Soltam. Perle came from one the above mentioned pro-Israel thinktanks, the AEI. Perle is one of the leading pro-Israeli fanatics leading this Iraq war mongering within the administration and now in the media. Paul Wolfowitz Former Deputy Defense Secretary, and member of Perle's Defense Policy Board, in the Pentagon. Wolfowitz is a close associate of Perle, and reportedly has close ties to the Israeli military. His sister lives in Israel. Wolfowitz came from the above mentioned Jewish thinktank, JINSA. Wolfowitz was the number two leader within the administration behind this Iraq war mongering. He later was appointed head of the World Bank but resigned under pressure from World Bank members over a scandal involving his misuse of power. Lawrence (Larry) Franklin The former Defense Intelligence Agency analyst with expertise in Iranian policy issues who worked in the office of Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Douglas Feith and reported directly to Feith's deputy, William Luti, was sentenced January 20, 2006, "to more than 12 years in prison for giving classified information to an Israeli diplomat" and members of the pro-Israel lobbying group American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) . Franklin will "remain free while the government continues with the wider case" and his "prison time could be sharply reduced in return for his help in prosecuting" former AIPAC members Steven J. Rosen and Keith Weissman, are scheduled to go on trial in April . Franklin admitted that he met periodically with Rosen and Weissman between 2002 and 2004 and discussed classified information, including information about potential attacks on U.S. troops in Iraq. Rosen and Weissman would later share what they learned with reporters and Israeli officials." (source: sourcewatch.com ). Douglas Feith Under Secretary of Defense and Policy Advisor at the Pentagon. He is a close associate of Perle and served as his Special Counsel. Like Perle and the others, Feith is a pro-Israel extremist, who has advocated anti-Arab policies in the past. He is closely associated with the extremist group, the Zionist Organization of America, which even attacks Jews that don't agree with its extremist views. Feith frequently speaks at ZOA conferences. Feith runs a small law firm, Feith and Zell, which only has one International office, in Israel. The majority of their legal work is representing Israeli interests. His firm's own website stated, prior to his appointment, that Feith "represents Israeli Armaments Manufacturer." Feith basically represents the Israeli War Machine. Feith also came from the Jewish thinktank JINSA. Feith, like Perle and Wolfowitz, are campaigning hard for this Israeli proxy war against Iraq.Feith was investigated by the FBI under suspicion of leaking classified information to Israel, being that he was Larry Franklin's boss when Franklin leaked those documents to Rosen and Weissman of AIPAC. For that he was forced to leave the National Security Council. Feith was also investigated by the Senate Intelligence Committee for sexing up 'intelligence' that was used to justify invading Iraq. Edward Luttwak Member of the National Security Study Group of the Department of Defence at the Pentagon. Luttwak is reportedly an Israeli citizen and has taught in Israel. He frequently writes for Israeli and pro-Israeli newspapers and journals. Luttwak is an Israeli extremist whose main theme in many of his articles is the necessity of the U.S. waging war against Iraq and Iran. Henry Kissinger One of many Pentagon Advisors, Kissinger sits on the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board under Perle. For detailed information about Kissinger's evil past, read Seymour Hersch's book (Price of Power: Kissinger in the Nixon White House). Kissinger likely had a part in the Watergate crimes, Southeast Asia mass murders (Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos), Installing Chilean mass murdering dictator Pinochet, Operation Condor's mass killings in South America, and more recently served as Serbia's Ex-Dictator Slobodan Milosevic's Advisor. He consistently advocated going to war against Iraq. Kissinger is the Ariel Sharon of the U.S. Unfortunately, President Bush nominated Kissinger as chairman of the September 11 investigating commission. It's like picking a bank robber to investigate a fraud scandal. He later declined this job under enormous protests. Dov Zakheim Dov Zakheim is an ordained rabbi and reportedly holds Israeli citizenship. Zakheim attended Jew's College in London and became an ordained Orthodox Jewish Rabbi in 1973. He was adjunct professor at New York's Jewish Yeshiva University. Zakheim is close to the Israeli lobby. Dov Zakheim is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and in 2000 a co-author of the Project for the New American Century's position paper, Rebuilding America's Defenses, advocating the necessity for a Pearl-Harbor-like incident to mobilize the country into war with its enemies, mostly Middle Eastern Muslim nations. He was appointed by Bush as Pentagon Comptroller from May 4, 2001 to March 10, 2004. At that time he was unable to explain the disappearance of $1 trillion dollars. Actually, nearly three years earlier, Donald Rumsfeld announced on September 10, 2001 that an audit discovered $2.3 trillion was also missing from the Pentagon books. That story, as mentioned, was buried under 9-11's rubble. The two sums disappeared on Zakheim's watch. We can only guess where that cash went. Despite these suspicions, on May 6, 2004, Zakheim took a lucrative position at Booz Allen Hamilton, one of the most prestigious strategy consulting firms in the world. One of its clients then was Blessed Relief, a charity said to be a front for Osama bin Laden. Booz, Allen & Hamilton then also worked closely with DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, which is the research arm of the Department of Defense. Judicial Inc's bio of Dov tells us Zakheim is a dual Israeli/American citizen and has been tracking the halls of US government for 25 years, casting defense policy and influence on Presidents Reagan, Clinton, Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. Judicial Inc points out that most of Israel's armaments were gotten thanks to him. Squads of US F-16 and F-15 were classified military surplus and sold to Israel at a fraction of their value. Kenneth Adelman One of many Pentagon Advisors, Adelman also sits on the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board under Perle, and is another extremist pro-Israel advisor, who supported going to war against Iraq. Adelman frequently is a guest on Fox News, and often expresses extremist and often ridiculus anti-Arab and anti-Muslim views. Through his racism or ignorance, he actually called Arabs "anti-Semitic" on Fox News (11/28/2001), when he could have looked it up in the dictionary to find out that Arabs by definition are Semites. I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby Vice President Dick Cheney's ex-Chief of Staff. As chief pro-Israel Jewish advisor to Cheney, it helps explains why Cheney is so gun-ho to invade Iran. Libby is longtime associate of Wolfowitz. Libby was also a lawyer for convicted felon and Israeli spy Marc Rich, whom Clinton pardoned, in his last days as president. Libby was recently found guilty of lying to Federal investigators in the Valerie Plame affair, in which Plame, a covert CIA agent, was exposed for political revenge by the Bush administration following her husband's revelations about the lies leading to the Iraq War. Robert Satloff U.S. National Security Council Advisor, Satloff was the executive director of the Israeli lobby's "think tank," Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Many of the Israeli lobby's "experts" come from this front group, like Martin Indyk. Elliott Abrams National Security Council Advisor. He previously worked at Washington-based "Think Tank" Ethics and Public Policy Center. During the Reagan Adminstration, Abrams was the Assistant Secretary of State, handling, for the most part, Latin American affairs. He played an important role in the Iran-Contra Scandal, which involved illegally selling U.S. weapons to Iran to fight Iraq, and illegally funding the contra rebels fighting to overthrow Nicaragua's Sandinista government. He also actively deceived three congressional committees about his involvement and thereby faced felony charges based on his testimony. Abrams pled guilty in 1991 to two misdemeanors and was sentenced to a year's probation and 100 hours of community service. A year later, former President Bush (Senior) granted Abrams a full pardon. He was one of the more hawkish pro-Israel Jews in the Reagan Administration's State Department. Marc Grossman Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs. He was Director General of the Foreign Service and Director of Human Resources at the Department of State. Grossman is one of many of the pro-Israel Jewish officials from the Clinton Administration that Bush has promoted to higher posts. Richard Haass Director of Policy Planning at the State Department and Ambassador at large. He is also Director of National Security Programs and Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). He was one of the more hawkish pro-Israel Jews in the first Bush (Sr) Administration who sat on the National Security Council, and who consistently advocated going to war against Iraq. Haass is also a member of the Defense Department's National Security Study Group, at the Pentagon. Robert Zoellick U.S. Trade Representative, a cabinet-level position. He is also one of the more hawkish pro-Israel Jews in the Bush (Jr) Administration who advocated invading Iraq and occupying a portion of the country in order to set up a Vichy-style puppet government. He consistently advocates going to war against Iran. Ari Fleischer Ex- White House Spokesman for the Bush (Jr) Administration. Prominent in the Jewish community, some reports state that he holds Israeli citizenship. Fleischer is closely connected to the extremist Jewish group called the Chabad Lubavitch Hasidics, who follow the Qabala, and hold very extremist and insulting views of non-Jews. Fleischer was the co-president of Chabad's Capitol Jewish Forum. He received the Young Leadership Award from the American Friends of Lubavitch in October, 2001. James Schlesinger One of many Pentagon Advisors, Schlesinger also sits on the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board under Perle and is another extremist pro-Israel advisor, who supported going to war against Iraq. Schlesinger is also a commissioner of the Defense Department's National Security Study Group, at the Pentagon. David Frum White House speechwriter behind the "Axis of Evil" label. He lumped together all the lies and accusations against Iraq for Bush to justify the war. Joshua Bolten White House Deputy Chief of Staff, Bolten was previously a banker, former legislative aide, and prominent in the Jewish community. John Bolton Former UN Representative and Under-Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security. Bolton is also a Senior Advisor to President Bush. Prior to this position, Bolton was Senior Vice President of the above mentioned pro-Israel thinktank, AEI. He recently (October 2002) accused Syria of having a nuclear program, so that they can attack Syria after Iraq. He must have forgotten that Israel has 400 nuclear warheads, some of which are thermonuclear weapons (according to a recent U.S. Air Force report). David Wurmser Special Assistant to John Bolton (above), the under-secretary for arms control and international security. Wurmser also worked at the AEI with Perle and Bolton. His wife, Meyrav Wurmser, along with Colonel Yigal Carmon, formerly of Israeli military intelligence, co-founded the Middle East Media Research Institute (Memri),a Washington-based Israeli outfit which distributes articles translated from Arabic newspapers portraying Arabs in a bad light. Eliot Cohen Member of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board under Perle and is another extremist pro-Israel advisor. Like Adelman, he often expresses extremist and often ridiculus anti-Arab and anti-Muslim views. More recently, he wrote an opinion article in the Wall Street Journal openly admitting his rascist hatred of Islam claiming that Islam should be the enemy, not terrorism. Mel Sembler President of the Export-Import Bank of the United States. A Prominent Jewish Republican and Former National Finance Chairman of the Republican National Committee. The Export-Import Bank facilitates trade relationships between U.S. businesses and foreign countries, specifically those with financial problems. Steve Goldsmith Senior Advisor to the President, and Bush's Jewish domestic policy advisor. He also served as liaison in the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives (White House OFBCI) within the Executive Office of the President. He was the former mayor of Indianapolis. He is also friends with Israeli Jerusalem Mayor Ehud Olmert and often visits Israel to coach mayors on privatization initiatives. Adam Goldman White House's Special Liaison to the Jewish Community. Joseph Gildenhorn Bush Campaign's Special Liaison to the Jewish Community. He was the DC finance chairman for the Bush campaign, as well as campaign coordinator, and former ambassador to Switzerland. Christopher Gersten Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Administration for Children and Families at HHS. Gersten was the former Executive Director of the Republican Jewish Coalition, Husband of Labor Secretary. Mark Weinberger Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development for Public Affairs. Samuel Bodman Deputy Secretary of Commerce. He was the Chairman and CEO of Cabot Corporation in Boston, Massachusetts. Bonnie Cohen Under Secretary of State for Management. Ruth Davis Director of Foreign Service Institute, who reports to the Office of Under Secretary for Management. This Office is responsible for training all Department of State staff (including ambassadors). Daniel Kurtzer Ambassador to Israel. Cliff Sobel Ambassador to the Netherlands. Stuart Bernstein Ambassador to Denmark. Nancy Brinker Ambassador to HungaryFrank Lavin Ambassador to Singapore. Ron Weiser Ambassador to Slovakia. Mel Sembler Ambassador to Italy. Martin Silverstein Ambassador to Uruguay. Lincoln Bloomfield Assistant Secretary of State for Political Military Affairs. Jay Lefkowitz Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of the Domestic Policy Council. Ken Melman White House Political Director. Brad Blakeman White House Director of Scheduling. I don't know about you, but dual citizenship is fine with me for an ordinary citizen. But if you hold an official position that demands that you put American interests above all else -- if you should look transparent and fair to the rest of the world regarding your formation of Middle East foreign policies, then this is a dangerous trend. Even if there were no pro-Israeli agenda, the fact that decision makers have a bias or an allegiance to one of the parties involved in the current conflict should have raised red flags long before now. If you think we're being unfair here, ask yourself: How you would react to the Head of Homeland Security if he or she were a dual national with citizenship in Iran, Lebanon or Saudi Arabia? Ask yourself why you don't feel the same about Israeli dual citizenship. Then you will understand how powerful the Israeli lobby has been in "adjusting" your acceptance of their special status. Hey, I could be way off on this. Let's hear from you. FBI arrests US scientist on spying charges In Jerusalem, Israeli government officials had no immediate comment. A scientist credited with helping discover evidence of water on the moon has been arrested on charges of attempting to pass on classified information to an FBI agent posing as an Israeli intelligence officer. The US justice department said Stewart David Nozette, 52, was charged with attempting to communicate, deliver and transmit classified information to an individual he believed to be an Israeli intelligence officer. The criminal complaint against Nozette does not allege that Israel's government or anyone acting on its behalf violated US law. In Jerusalem, where the story broke late at night, Israeli government officials had no immediate comment. Nozette, from Maryland, was arrested yesterday by FBI agents. He is expected to appear in federal court in Washington today. In an affidavit supporting the complaint, Leslie Martell, a FBI agent, said that on 3 September, Nozette received a telephone call from an individual purporting to be an Israeli intelligence officer. The caller was an undercover FBI agent. Nozette agreed to meet with the agent later that day at a hotel in Washington. During the meeting the two discussed Nozette's willingness to work for Israeli intelligence. The scientist allegedly said that he had, in the past, held top security clearances and had access to US satellite information, the affidavit said. Nozette also was alleged to have said he would be willing to answer questions about this information in exchange for money . According to the affidavit, the agent explained that the Israeli intelligence agency, Mossad, would arrange for a communication system so Nozette could pass on information in a post office box. Nozette agreed to provide regular, continuing information and asked for an Israeli passport, the government alleged. The affidavit then alleged the following sequence of events: Sept. 4: Nozette and the agent met again in the same hotel. The scientist allegedly said that while he no longer had legal access to any classified information at a US government facility, he could, nonetheless, recall classified information by memory. He allegedly asked when he could expect to receive his first settlement, saying he preferred cash amounts "under ten thousand" so he didn't have to report it to merchant accounts . (Anti-money laundering laws require that all transactions of $10,000 (^Alb6,000) or more must be reported to the US tax authorities). Nozette allegedly told the agent, "Well, I should tell you my first need is that they should figure out how to pay me ... They don't expect me to do this for free." Like most businessmen he was watching and securing his personal finance . Sept. 10: Undercover FBI agents left a letter in the designated post office box, asking Nozette to answer a list of questions about US satellite information. The agents provided a $2,000 cash payment. Serial numbers of the bills were recorded. Sept. 16: Nozette was captured on videotape leaving a manila envelope in the post office box. The next day, agents retrieved the sealed envelope and found, among other things, a one-page document containing answers to the questions and an encrypted computer thumb drive. One answer contained information, classified as secret, that concerned capabilities of a prototype overhead collection system. Sept. 17: Agents left a second letter in the post office box with another list of questions about US satellite information. The FBI also left a cash payment of $9,000. Nozette allegedly retrieved the questions and the money the same day. Oct. 1: Nozette was videotaped leaving a manila envelope in the post office box. FBI agents retrieved it and found a second set of answers. The responses contained information classified as top secret and secret, involving US satellites, early warning systems, means of defence or retaliation against large-scale attack, communications intelligence information, and major elements of defence strategy. Nozette had worked in varying jobs for the department of energy, the national aeronautics and space, and in the national space council in the president's office in 1989 and 1990. The scientist developed the Clementine bistatic radar experiment that purportedly discovered water on the south pole of the moon. He worked from approximately 1990 to 1999 at the department of energy's Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California, where he designed highly advanced technology. At the department of energy, Nozette held a special security clearance equivalent to the defence department top secret and "critical nuclear weapon design information" clearances. Department of energy clearances apply to access to information specifically relating to atomic or nuclear-related materials. Nozette also held top offices at the Alliance for Competitive Technology, a nonprofit company that he organised in March 1990. Between January 2000 and February 2006, Nozette, through his company, had several agreements to develop advanced technology for the US government. He performed some of the research and development at the US Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, the Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency in Arlington, Virginia, and at Nasa's Goddard Space Flight Centre in Greenbelt, Maryland. March 2010 Four-fifths of the U.S. House and Senate recently declared in correspondence to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that the U.S. must reaffirm its "unbreakable bond" with Israel. What persuaded our Congress to proclaim their loyalty to Israel while our military is waging war in the Middle East based on fabricated intelligence? Any sober assessment of this bond must concede a need to reappraise its cost in blood and treasure. Yet the Congress - our Congress - opposed that reassessment even as our commander-in-chief seeks to end a brutal Israeli occupation of Palestine that has provoked worldwide outrage for more than six decades. The Congress and the president are sworn to the same oath of office. That oath obliges them to protect the U.S. from all threats, both foreign and domestic. The facts confirm a common pro-Israeli source of the phony intelligence that took our military to war in Iraq. All the evidence points to Israel or its surrogates, including those in the Congress. Is that why the Israel lobby pressed the Congress for a pledge of allegiance to Israel?

ALL ABOUT THE MINOT AFB NUCLEAR WEAPONS MISHANDLING INDICENT

Vegas Street Prophet — Sat, 20 Apr 2013 12:46:42 -0400

ALL ABOUT THE MINOT AFB NUCLEAR WEAPONS MISHANDLING INDICENT https://anonfiles.com/file/22d01053fbc513f4c25ed6055b320630 THE MISSING B-52 2007 A US Air Force B-52 bomber. The US military said on Wednesday it was investigating an alarming security lapse when a B-52 bomber flew the length of the country last week loaded with six nuclear-armed cruise missiles The missiles were mounted on the wings of a B-52 bomber compiled by Dee Finney http://www.military.cz/usa/air/in_service/aircraft/b52/b52.jpg The Boeing B-52 Stratofortress is a long-range, subsonic jet strategic bomber flown by the United States Air Force (USAF) since 1955. The B-52 replaced the Convair B-36 and the Boeing B-47 . Built to carry nuclear weapons for Cold War era deterrence missions, it has dropped only conventional munitions in actual combat. The aircraft has the longest unrefuelled range of any bomber and carries up to 70,000 pounds of weapons. The USAF has had B-52s in active service since 1955 with the Strategic Air Command which was absorbed into the Air Combat Command in 1991. Its superior performance at high subsonic speeds and relatively low operating costs have kept the B-52 in service despite proposals to replace it with the Mach 3 XB-70 Valkyrie , supersonic B-1B Lancer , and stealth B-2 Spirit . In January 2005, it became the second aircraft, after the English Electric Canberra , to mark 50 years of continuous service with its original primary operator. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-52_Stratofortress for more B-52 carried nuclear missiles over US by mistake: military Sep 5, 2007 WASHINGTON (AFP) - The US military said on Wednesday it was investigating an alarming security lapse when a B-52 bomber flew the length of the country last week loaded with six nuclear-armed cruise missiles. The blunder was reported to President George W. Bush after the nuclear warheads were discovered when the aircraft landed at Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana, a military official said on condition of anonymity. An air force official, who also asked to remain unnamed, said the B-52, which originated at Minot Air Base in North Dakota, had six cruise missiles with nuclear warheads loaded on pylons under its wings. The US Air Force has relieved the munition squadron commander at Minot Air Base in North Dakota of his duties, and launched an investigation into the August 30 incident, a Pentagon spokesman said. "At no time was there a threat to public safety," said Lieutenant Colonel Ed Thomas. "It is important to note that munitions were safe, secure and under military control at all times." The Pentagon would not provide details, citing secrecy rules, but an expert said the incident was unprecedented, and pointed to a disturbing lapse in the air force's command and control system. "It seems so fantastic that so many points, checks can dysfunction," he said Hans Kristensen, an expert on US nuclear forces. " We have so many points and checks specifically so we don't have these kinds of incidents," he said. US lawmakers expressed outrage at the incident. "It is absolutely inexcusable that the Air Force lost track of these five nuclear warheads, even for a short period of time," Representative Edward Markey, a Democrat on the House Homeland Security Committee, said in a statement. "Nothing like this has ever been reported before and we have been assured for decades that it was impossible," said Markey. Two Republican lawmakers on committees overseeing military affairs, Jim Saxton and Terry Everett, said in a joint statement they were "deeply concerned" by the incident and said the United States must "ensure our nuclear assets are protected by the highest safeguards." The breach originally was reported by the Military Times newspaper Wednesday and was confirmed by the Pentagon later in the day. US Defense Secretary Robert Gates was notified early Friday of the incident by Air Force chief of staff General Michael "Buzz" Moseley, Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell said. "I can also tell you that it was important enough that President Bush was notified of it," Morrell said. Gates has received daily briefings from Moseley on the incident, and expects a report by the end of next week, he said. "The munitions squadron commander has been relieved of his duties, and final action is pending the outcome of the investigation," he said. " In addition, other airmen were decertified from their duties involving munitions." Kristensen said he knew of no other publicly acknowledged case of live nuclear weapons being flown on bombers since the late 1960s. The nuclear weapons expert said the air force keeps a computerized command and control system that traces any movement of a nuclear weapon so that they have a complete picture of where they are at any given time. He said there would be checks and detailed procedures at various points from the time they are moved out of bunkers until they are loaded onto planes, and flown away. "That's perhaps what is most worrisome about this particular incident -- that apparently an individual who had command authority about moving these weapons around decided to do so," he said. "It's a command and control issue and it's one that calls into question the system, because if one individual can do that who knows what can happen," he said. Nuclear weapons are normally transferred on cargo planes, never on the wings of bombers, Kristensen said. Bomber flights with live nuclear weapons ended in the late 1960s after accidents in Spain in 1966 and in Greenland in 1968. The weapons were among 400 advanced cruise missiles that the Defense Department quietly decided to retire in March over the course of this year. The advanced cruise missile is a stealthy, longer range version of the air launched cruise missile first deployed in the early 1980s. It carries W-80 warheads of up to 150 kilotons, ten times the destructive force of the bomb dropped on Hiroshima at the end of World War Two. Oops! Were those nuclear warheads on my B-52 bomber? By Staff September 5, 2007 (AXcess News) Houston - A U.S. Air Force B-52 bomber took off from Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota on a flight to Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana on August 30, which was not out of the ordinary. But what was extraordinary was that it was carrying five nuclear warheads, which the military says was a mistake, or was it? The B-52 was carrying Advanced Cruise Missiles (ACM) which normally carries a W80-1 nuclear warhead with a yield of 5 to 150 kilotons. The ACMs were supposed to have had the nuclear warheads removed before they were transported to Louisiana. B-52 bombers normally deliver the ACMs when they are equipped with nuclear warheads, but these were a part of 400 missiles which were being decommissioned and the nuclear warheads were not supposed to be attached. Oops! An Air Force investigation is said to have been launched to find out how nuclear warheads could have been attached to the B-52 bombers wings for transport and no one notice them missing for nearly four hours. A former Defense Department specialist who worked on nuclear weapons said no one was ever in danger had the bomber crashed as safeguards are installed that make the nuclear detonation impossible unless specifically triggered to do so. Questions arise over whether B-52 bomber flights are being prepared for long-range flights that might include carrying nuclear warheads after Russia began its own long-range bomber flights after the U.S. said it would not back off the installation of missile sites near the border of Russia, insisting that they were for protection against Iran and other renegade countries in the Middle East. The tit-for-tat military developments have been escalating between Russia and the United States that critics say look more like the start of another Cold War. To the North, Russia has claimed sovereignty over a vast area of the Artic seabed, claiming its part of the continental shelf extending out fro Russia's shoreline and Canada and the U.S. have both increased military presence in the Artic to protect the passage way. Washington, Sept. 5 , 2007 - (Xinhua) -- U.S. Defense Department official confirmed Wednesday that a B-52 bomber had been mistakenly loaded with nuclear weapons and flown over American sky. Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell tried to appease the country by saying "at no time was the public in danger." President George W. Bush and Defense Secretary Robert Gates have been already informed of the incident and ordered a probe into it. Earlier Wednesday, media reports, citing an unidentified Pentagon source, said that a B-52 bomber was mistakenly armed with six nuclear warheads and flown over three hours across several states. The plane, loaded with Advanced Cruise Missiles, took off on Aug. 30 from North Dakota and headed to Louisiana. The incident resulted in a comprehensive procedure review by Air Force and the dismissal of a commander, the reports said. House Armed Services Committee Chairman Rep. Ike Skelton described the weapon mishandling "deeply disturbing" and called for more details to ensure that Defense Department would address it appropriately. "There is no more serious issue than the security and proper handling of nuclear weapons," the Democratic said in a Wednesday's statement. September 7, 2007 Questions Remain Over Nuclear-Armed B-52 Over Midwest by Wayne Madsen http://www.opednews.com The reported "loss" of six nuclear-armed stealthy advance cruise missiles (ACMs) flown on the wing pylons of a B-52 from Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota to Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana on August 30 would represent a complete and unprecedented breakdown in the command and control of nuclear weapons in the United States. For that reason, there is a belief among many seasoned military experts that there is much more to this reported story than meets the eye. The Defense Department is merely describing the nuclear missile flight as an "incident," because it is standard Pentagon policy to not comment on its nuclear weapons. However, the "incident" was serious enough that President Bush and Defense Secretary Robert Gates were both immediately informed of the so-called "mistake" in flying the weapons across several Midwestern states. Missouri Representative Ike Skelton, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, called the incident "deeply disturbing." The incident was first reported by three military officers, who remained anonymous, to Military Times , a newspaper that maintains good contacts within the military services. The ACMs were armed with six W80-Mod 1 nuclear weapons, which pack a punch of between 5 and 150 kilotons each. There is informed speculation that the movement of the nuclear weapons to Barksdale was leaked because the air force base is a staging area for deployment to the Middle East. The Pentagon recently drew up plans to hit 1200 targets inside Iran in a massive bombardment campaign aimed at destroying its military and overthrowing its government. The movement of the nuclear weapons may have been an alert to the public by disgruntled members of the military that such plans would include the pre-emptive use of nuclear weapons. The report that the weapons were transferred to Barksdale for "decommissioning" appears to be a cover story concocted by Pentagon spinmeisters, since any movement of nuclear weapons is treated as highly-classified information. The B-52 sat on a runway at Barksdale for a full 10 hours with the Air Force trying to have the public believe that no one noticed the nuclear missiles on board. The flight from Minot was three and a half hours. The only casualty: the munitions officer at Minot was relieved of his duties pending the outcome of an investigation. There is also speculation that the war hawks in the administration may have flown the nuclear cruise missiles to Louisiana to send a message to Iran. The Defense Department remains a beehive of neocon activity even with Gates in charge. Three other recent incidents indicate the neocons are still employing their perception management campaigns. Cells of so-called "Al Qaeda" terrorists have been arrested in Denmark and Germany. Both countries have neocons embedded in their governments. Those arrested include Danish and German nationals. In addition, the recent weapons of mass destruction "scare" at a United Nations office building in New York, where "phosgene" gas seized in Iraq after Desert Storm was reportedly found in a vial, turns out to have been a hoax. The substance was a non-toxic cleaning solvent. UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon has named a number of neocons to senior staff positions within the UN Secretariat. http://www.waynemadsenreport.com For more, visit Wayne Madsen Report , which its publisher, Wayne Madsen, keeps refreshed with more news than any one reporter has a right to. Wayne Madsen is an investigative journalist, nationally distributed columnist, and author who has covered Washington, DC, politics, national security, and intelligence issues since 1994. He has written for The Village Voice, The Progressive, CAQ, Counterpunch, and the Intelligence Newsletter (based in Paris). Look for his new book, Overthrow a Fascist Regime on $15 a Day: The Internet Irregulars vs. The Powers That Be!, in the fall. US B-52 in nuclear cargo blunder investigation after a B 52 bomber flew across the US last week mistakenly loaded with nuclear-armed missiles. It follows reports in the Army Times that five missiles were unaccounted for during the three-hour flight from North Dakota to Louisiana. The air force said the cruise missiles were safe at all times. Army Times said the missiles were to be decommissioned but were mistakenly mounted on the bomber's wings. The W80-1 warhead has a yield of five to 150 kilotons, the paper said. 'Decertified' The flight took place on 30 August, from the Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota to the Barksdale Air Force Base, near Bossier City, in Louisiana. Air force spokesman Lt Col Ed Thomas said although this was an "isolated incident", Air Combat Command had directed a "command- wide stand down to review process at all of our bases". Col Thomas said a general had been appointed to investigate the incident and would report by 14 September. "At no time was there a threat to public safety. It is important to note that munitions were safe, secure and under military control at all times," Col Thomas said. "The air force takes its mission to safeguard weapons seriously. No effort will be spared to ensure that the matter is thoroughly and completely investigated." Army Times quoted the colonel as saying the loading crew involved had been temporarily "decertified" pending retraining and the investigation. A military official told AFP news agency that President George W Bush had been informed of the mix-up. "There are procedures in place and they kicked in and worked," the official said. The BBC's Adam Brookes in Washington says experts have made it clear that if the plane had crashed there would not have been a nuclear explosion but there could have been a threat from plutonium leakage. Commander disciplined for nuclear mistake By Michael Hoffman, Military Times The Air Force continued handing out disciplinary actions in response to the six nuclear warheads mistakenly flown on a B-52 bomber from Minot Air Force Base, N.D., to Barksdale Air Force Base, La., on Aug. 30. The squadron commander in charge of Minot's munitions crews was relieved of all duties pending the investigation. It was originally reported that five nuclear warheads were transported, but officers who tipped Military Times to the incident who have asked to remain anonymous since they are not authorized to discuss the incident, have since updated that number to six. Air Force and defense officials would not confirm the missiles were armed with nuclear warheads Wednesday, citing longstanding policy, but they did confirm the Air Force was "investigating an error made last Thursday during the transfer of munitions" from Minot to Barksdale. The original plan was to transport non-nuclear Advanced Cruise Missiles, mounted on the wings of a B-52, to Barksdale as part of a Defense Department effort to decommission 400 of the ACMs. It was not discovered that the six missiles had nuclear warheads until the plane landed at Barksdale, leaving the warheads unaccounted for during the approximately 3 and one-half hour flight between the two bases, the officers said. President Bush was immediately alerted to the mistake and the Air Force launched a service-wide investigation headed by Maj. Gen. Douglas Raaberg, director of Air and Space Operations at Air Combat Command Headquarters, said Air Force spokesman Lt. Col. Ed Thomas. FIND MORE STORIES IN: Air Force AIR FORCE BASE Department of Defense Minot B- 52 Ed Thomas Michael Hoffman Secretary of Defense Robert Gates has requested daily briefings from Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Michael Moseley on the progress of the investigation. Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., a member of the Senate Appropriations defense subcommittee, requested a full-classified briefing, not just the preliminary information being provided to lawmakers, to explain how a mistake of this magnitude could have happened. Thomas said the transfer was conducted safely and the American public was never in any danger since the weapons were in Air Force custody and control at all times. But few critics were placated Wednesday by the Air Force's reassurances. "Nothing like this has ever been reported before and we have been assured for decades that it was impossible," said Rep. Edward Markey, D-Mass., co-chair of the House Bi-partisan Task Force. Non-proliferation treaty experts said the Air Force didn't violate any international nuclear treaties by transporting the nuclear warheads on the B-52, but it was the first time since 1968 that it's been known publicly that nuclear warheads were transported on a U.S. bomber. The Defense Department does transport nuclear warheads by air, but instead of bombers it uses C-17 or C-130 cargo aircraft. "These reports are deeply disturbing," said Rep. Ike Skelton, D-Mo., chairman of the House Armed Services Committee. " The American people, our friends, and our potential adversaries must be confident that the highest standards are in place when it comes to our nuclear arsenal." The Defense Department uses a computerized tracking program to keep tabs on each one of its nuclear warheads, said Hans Kristensen, director of the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists. For the six warheads to make it onto the B-52, each one would have had to be signed out of its storage bunker and transported to the bomber. Diligent safety protocols would have to have been ignored to load the warheads onto the plane, he said. "I just can't imagine how all of this happened," said Philip Coyle, a senior adviser on nuclear weapons at the Center for Defense Information. "The procedures are so rigid; this is the last thing that's supposed to happen." At no time was there a risk for a nuclear detonation, even if the B-52 crashed on its way to Barksdale, said Steve Fetter, a former Defense Department official who worked on nuclear weapons policy in 1993-94. A crash would ignite the high explosives associated with the warhead, and possibly cause a leak of plutonium, but the warhead's elaborate safeguards would prevent a nuclear detonation from occurring, he said. "The Air Force takes its mission to safeguard weapons seriously," Thomas said. "No effort will be spared to ensure that the matter is thoroughly and completely investigated." Along with the 5th Munitions Squadron commander, the munitions crews involved in mistakenly loading the nuclear warheads at Minot have been temporarily decertified from performing their duties involving munitions, pending corrective actions or additional training, Thomas said. The error comes after the Air Force announced last March the 5th Bomb Wing won two servicewide safety awards during fiscal year 2006. "This is really shocking," Coyle said. "The Air Force can't tolerate it, and the Pentagon can't tolerate it, either." http://www.usatoday.com/news/military/2007-09-05-b-52_N.htm In Error, B-52 Flew Over U.S. With Nuclear-Armed Missiles By Josh White Washington Post Staff Writer Thursday, September 6, 2007; An Air Force B-52 bomber flew across the central United States last week with six cruise missiles armed with nuclear warheads that were mistakenly attached to the airplane's wing, defense officials said yesterday. The Stratofortress bomber, based at Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota , was transporting a dozen Advanced Cruise Missiles to Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana on Aug. 30. But crews inadvertently loaded half of them with nuclear warheads attached. Air Force officials said the warheads were not activated and at no time posed a threat to the public. But a timeline of the episode supplied by the Air Force yesterday to House and Senate lawmakers indicated that the missiles in question sat on a runway in Louisiana for nearly 10 hours before workers noticed that the nuclear warheads were inside. Military officials also said they were concerned that the warheads were unaccounted for several hours while the missiles were in transit. The missiles never left Air Force control, they said. The cruise missiles -- part of an Air Force fleet of more than 400 of their kind -- are being retired and usually would not carry nuclear warheads while being transported. Defense officials said the B-52's mission last week did not include training runs, so the missiles were never meant to be launched. The cruise missiles have a range of about 2,000 miles and are designed to hit precision targets well behind a potential enemy's lines. Two defense officials said it is unclear how stringent safeguards for the handling of nuclear weapons were skirted, allowing the missiles with the warheads to be loaded onto a pylon that was then attached to the underside of the B-52's wing. Air Force officials said the mistake was a serious breach of rules and that an investigation began immediately. Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl M. Levin (D-Mich.) and Sen. John McCain ( Ariz. ), the panel's ranking Republican, yesterday jointly called the episode "a matter of grave concern" and, in a letter to Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates , requested an investigation of the incident by the Pentagon 's inspector general. The aircraft's pilots and other crew members were unaware that they were carrying nuclear warheads, officials said. "Essentially, this is an issue of a departure from our very exacting standards," said Lt. Col. Edward Thomas, an Air Force spokesman at the Pentagon, who declined to confirm that nuclear warheads were involved. "The Air Force maintains the highest standards of safety and precision, so any deviation from these well-established munitions procedures is very serious, and we are responding swiftly." The incident, first reported by the Military Times, prompted senior leaders to relieve a munitions squadron commander of his duties. Other airmen have been temporarily suspended from duties. "Nothing like this has ever been reported before, and we have been assured for decades that it was impossible," said Rep. Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), co-chairman of the House Bipartisan Task Force on Nonproliferation. "The complete breakdown of the Air Force command and control over enough nuclear weapons to destroy several cities has frightening implications not only for the Air Force, but for the security of our entire nuclear weapons stockpile." The Air Force's Air Combat Command has ordered a stand-down for its bases next week to review procedures and prevent a repeat of the mistake. "All evidence seems to point to this being an isolated mistake," Thomas said. Geoff Morrell, a Pentagon spokesman, told reporters at a news conference yesterday that Gates was informed of the incident early last Friday and has been receiving daily progress reports. Morrell said President Bush was also notified. In a statement yesterday, Rep. Ike Skelton (D-Mo.), chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, said he found the reports "deeply disturbing." Was That Nuclear-Armed B-52 Flight Destined for Iran? Written by Dave Lindorff Monday, 10 September 2007 There's something definitely screwy about the August 30 incident in which a B-52 bomber flew from Minot AFB in North Dakota to Barksdale AFB in Louisiana carrying five fully armed Advanced Cruise Missiles, each equipped with nuclear bombs capable of exploding at anything from 5 kilotons to 150 kilotons. The government has been quick to say that the flight, which violated a number of long-standing orders regarding shipment of nuclear weapons in US airspace, was a "mistake." But was it a mistake? The biggest question is why a B-52 armed with nuclear-tipped cruise missiles would fly to Barksdale AFB. If, as reported, the weapons were being transported to be decommissioned, which supposedly is the destination for 400 of these doomsday weapons, then they should have been destined for Kirtland AFB in New Mexico, near the Pantex plant outside Amarillo, TX, where they would be dismantled. As Michael Salla writes in a disturbing piece in Saturday's edition of OpEdNews , the weapons should also not have been flown at all on a B-52, as there have been standing orders for 40 years against such flights over US soil, following several accidents in which bombs or nuclear-armed rockets were lost because "broken arrow" incidents including inadvertent bomb drops or crashes. A second order, issued in 1991 at the end of the Cold War by George Bush's father, barred the loading of nuclear weapons on any bomber. Any pilot would have known this, as would any ground support people loading the missiles on the B-52. According to Salla, if these five cruise missiles were really being transported by air to Texas for decommissioning, they should have been disarmed and flown in specially designed transport planes that are built to resist nuclear leakage in the event of a crash. They would never be transported under the wings of a B-52. What makes the incident even more suspicious is that Barksdale AFB is a staging area for B-52s being sent to the Middle East for combat duty. As the website GlobalSecurity.org reports: "Barksdale Air Force Base is headquarters for the 2d Bomb Wing, Eighth Air Force and 917th Wing. The 2d Bomb Wing provides global combat capability and trains all B-52 combat crews." The official Barksdale AFB website says: "Barksdale warriors and B-52s have a proud tradition serving both at home and abroad in support of the Global War on Terrorism; they have played vital roles in combat operations supporting Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan and Operation Iraqi Freedom." The original expose of the B-52 flight appeared in the newspaper . Staff writer Michael Hoffman writes that his initial source for the story was three officers "who asked not to be identified because they were not authorized to discuss the incident." So this is a case where some military officers who knew something wrong was happening did the honorable, patriotic thing and went public with a publication they trusted, both to do the right thing, and to protect them. So what is actually going on here? Salla suggests the worst: that this was likely a deliberate action, ordered through a chain of command outside the Pentagon. Salla notes that it has been widely reported that the top brass in the US military (note: with the exception of some wackos in the Air Force), have staunchly opposed any use of nuclear weapons in the event of an air attack on Iran. So an order to send nuclear-armed cruise missiles to the Persian Gulf region, if that's what this flight was, would not likely have come through the normal chain of command from the Secretary of Defense through the Air Combat Command (ACC, successor to SAC). It would, Salla hints darkly, have come through the back channel set up since even before 9-11 by Vice President Dick Cheney, who is known to be pushing for an attack on Iran, and who would like nothing better than to use nuclear weapons to disable Iran's nuclear processing facilities. We're talking about high treason, if Salla is right. And the seriousness of what happened - five nuclear-tipped cruise missiles, in firing position, flown across the width of the continental US in violation of all standing orders to a base that is a staging area for B-52 flights to the Persian Gulf war zone - demands a full public investigation. The Democrats in charge of Congress, and the Republican minority, may not have the stomach to stand up to the Bush administration's obsession to keep the bloodletting going in Iraq, and they may not have the courage even to put a stop to plans to attack Iran, but even the most reprehensible weasels and cowards among them should have the basic decency to know that this bizarre and suspicious flight needs to be investigated to the fullest to get to the bottom of what was going on. Salla suggests that behind the scenes, Gates and the generals, who clearly distrust and dislike the vice president and who don't want an Iran attack, will use this incident to go after the vice president and force him into a "medical" resignation. He says that the exposure of the flight will also put any attack on Iran on hold, because military leaders will be worried that there are other nuclear weapons that have been introduced into the equation secretly, either for use in Iraq or for a "black flag" operation against US forces. Let us hope so they are right, and that this will be Cheney's undoing. I'm not as confident as Salla, however. If it turns out that Cheney was behind this incident, that its goal was as sinister as Salla suspects, and that it was only the brave action of several officers who went public and leaked information about it that led to the undoing of the plan, it may take more than behind-the-scenes pressure from the Defense Department to take down the vice president. Moreover, if Cheney simply resigned, without the incident being exposed publicly, Americans would not ever know how close we came to global disaster, martial law, and the end of America as we know it. It is essential that Congress get to the bottom of this one. Every person remotely connected to this mission needs to be called before Congress and put under oath to explain what happened. An independent prosecutor should also be named to start a criminal investigation. Note: Back in the early 1970s, my wife and I knew an Air Force reservist who told us he was flying secret missions for the government, to Central America and to the Middle East. He never explained what these were, but it was clear that they were connected with secret operations of a military nature. This individual, who had turned belatedly against the Vietnam War, and had begun to question what he was doing in secret, died under mysterious circumstances in his apartment. His mother went to the morgue to pick up the body only to discovered to her horror that it was not her son. Someone had removed his corpse, making any investigation as to cause of death impossible. There are sinister operations carried on by this government, and this looks like one that is as sinister as it can get. The crew of that B-52 and the ground crew that loaded it, should be watching their backs. B-52 Bomber Incident and Insider Trading? Was Someone Trying to Profit from a Nuclear Attack Against Iran Before September 21? by Michael E. Salla, M.A., Ph.D. September 11, 2007 A B-52 bomber loaded with five (increased to six in later reports) nuclear weapons fitted on the pylons under its wings was discovered after sitting for ten hours on a tarmac at Barksdale AFB on 30 August 2007. Three anonymous Air Force officers leaked the news of the incident to the Army Times newspaper which announced the discovery on 5 September 2007. The discovery immediately gained world wide coverage: LINK . The "mainstream" Big Business-owned news media has so far concentrated on the U.S. Air Force version of events that the incident was an "error" and is now subject to an official investigation. Barksdal e AFB is a staging post for Middle East operations and routinely has B-52 flying missions. The B-52 incident has subsequently led to speculation that the nuclear weapons were intended for a covert mission to Iran, and the Office of the Vice President was probably involved in bypassing the normal chain of military command, LINK . The discovery of the B-52 came on top of rapidly increasing speculation that the U.S. Bush administration is about to authorize a massive pre-emptive aerial assault against Iran. According to the Sunday Times, the Pentagon has prepared for air strikes against 1,200 targets in Iran that would in three days destroy Iran's military infrastructure, LINK . What gives reports of a planned attack against Iran involving nuclear weapons greater credibility is a number of mysterious August 2007 purchases of a particular type of stock called 'put options' and 'call options' which are based on a dramatic shift in the U.S. stock market, 1 research.wtc7.net/sept11/stockputs.html"> LINK . The investments were so suspicious that they became subject to an insider trading investigation by U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) but the no one was ever identified or charged. This was despite a determined effort by the SEC to find who was behind the investments. The parallels with "put" and "call option" purchases just before 9/11 has led to speculation that the August billion dollar inves Iran's military infrastructure, or used in a False Flag operation that would have justified a U.S. assault on Iran. Admiral William Fallon, Commander of U.S. Central Command, was to direct conventional bombing operations against Iran's military infrastructure. The covert mission, however, would have had a different chain of command, where the Office of the Vice President was to take a prominent role. The nuclear weapons on the B-52 had adjustable yields between five and 150 kilotons which would have made them suitable in taking out Iran's deep underground nuclear facilities. The effect of tactical nuclear weapons to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities would have been devastating. Radioactive contamination would have dispersed widely affecting the health of millions in the region. At the same time, Iran's military and much of its civilian infrastructure would be destroyed by conventional munitions. This would have restricted Iran's abilities to cope with the health and humanitarian impact of the use of nuclear weapons, and destruction of itss. One question to be asked is who are the hidden investors with insider knowledge that stood to gain billions in short term profits from a possible attack against Iran?? This answer will give an important clue to the long term agenda being played out, and the principal actors involved. In the case of 9/11, similar investors were able to evade detection from an official investigation by the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC launched an unprecedented investigation that deputized "hundreds, if not thousands, of key players in the private sector", LINK . According to former Los Angeles Police Officer, Michael Ruppert, what happens when individuals are deputized is that they are sworn to secrecy on national security grounds. This was a very effective way of keeping secret what was discovered in the SEC investigation. What is the most plausible explanation for the kind of investor that would have the power to subvert an SEC investigation in this manner? The most likely answer is the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). It has been alleged that CIA front companies annually supply funds for a black budget used to fund covert national security projects . The black budget has been estimated to range between 1.1 to 1.7 trillion dollars annually which is funnelled through the CIA to various military-corporate entities fulfilling such projects, LINK . Reportedly, a massive size black budget is needed to fund an alleged "second" Manhattan Project. Such alleged projects would be so deeply compartmentalized and classified, that most members of U.S. Congress would not be informed of their existence. The CIA is uniquely suited to perform this function of secretly raising revenue through the 1949 CIA Act which authorizes the CIA to expend funds "without regard to any provisions of law" (50USC 15:1.403f.a.1.). The CIA therefore does not have to follow any legal requirements for the funds it procures from various sources, and funnels to military-corporate entities directly responsible for the second Manhattan project. The discovery of the nuclear armed B-52 is likely to lead to an indefinite delay in plans for a pre-emptive military attack against Iran. There is nevertheless a need to expose the principle actors and the underlying agendas of those behind the covert plans to use nuclear weapons. It is also important to expose anonymous investors that intended to commercially profit from such an attack before September 21, and had insider knowledge of this. Former U.S. President Eisenhower had warned that an informed public is the best safeguard against unwarranted abuses of executive power. Arguably, a pre-emptive attack against Iran that does not have the support of the American people or U.S. Congress, would qualify for such an abuse. It appears that the period leading up to September 21, 2007 was to witness a pre-emptive attack against Iran, involving nuclear weapons loaded on at least one B-52 bomber. The humanitarian cost in terms of radioactive fallout, and casualties from the destruction of Iran's military and much of its civilian infrastructure would have been catastrophic for the Persian Gulf region (nuclear fallout would also subsequently circle the globe, which would be followed by the proliferation of related diseases and environmental problems adversely effecting all of humanity and other living species on Earth). Furthermore, the U.S. and global economy would have gone into a deep free fall in the event of dramatic increases in oil prices and further instability in the Middle East. Out of this planned tragedy, anonymous investors with possible CIA connections and insider knowledge, had the opportunity to plan for commercial profit. It is further alleged that financial proceeds would have been used to secretly fund an alleged second Manhattan Project that would-piggy back on the military execution of an aggressive neo-conservative agenda against Iran, in the Middle East geo-political milieu. Hopefully, the discovery of the nuclear armed B-52 has averted such a tragedy for the moment. Now is the time to consider the wisdom to consider allegations associated with an apparently aborted pre-emptive strike against Iran, and to make accountable all those who are responsible. About the author: Michael E. Salla, M.A. Ph.D., is a former Assistant Professor in the School of International Service, American University, Washington D.C. He is the author of five books and founder of the Exopolitics Institute, a 501(c)3 non-profit organization based in Kona, Hawaii. (This Institute is about how to make contact with Extraterrestrials) http://www.rense.com/general78/missn.htm Is USAF Stand Down To Find A Missing Nuke? Someone, operating under a special chain of command within the United States Air Force, just stole a nuclear weapon. By Chuck Simpson AboveTopSecret.com 9-12-7 Some History Barksdale Missile Number Six deserves far more public attention than it's received to date. Missile Number Six is potentially the major story of at least this year. Until 1968 under the Airborne Alert Program, informally called Operation Chrome Dome, the Air Force routinely kept about a dozen strategic bombers with nuclear weapons flying at all times. One predictable result was crashes and incidents. In 1968 the Department of Defense published a list of 13 serious nuclear weapons accidents that occurred between 1950 and 1968. In 1980 the list was revised to include 32 incidents through that year. Notably, the Pentagon has not acknowledged any accidents since 1980. This alone highlights the importance the Pentagon is placing on the recent transportation of nuclear weapons from North Dakota to Louisiana. Through 1968, several reported incidents involved plane crashes or malfunctions, beginning with the crash of a B-29 near Fairfield, California in August 1950. The resulting blast was felt 30 miles away. In July 1950 a B-50 crashed near Lebanon, Ohio. The high-explosive trigger for the nuclear weapon detonated on impact. The blast was felt over 25 miles away. In May 1957 a nuclear weapon fell from the bomb bay of a B-36 near Albuquerque, New Mexico. Parachutes malfunctioned and the weapon was destroyed on impact. In October 1957 near Homestead, Florida a B-47 crashed. The nuclear weapon was burned. In March 1958 a B-47 accidentally dropped a nuclear weapon near Florence, South Carolina. The high-explosive trigger detonated on impact. In November 1958 a B-47 crashed near Abilene, Texas. The trigger of the nuclear weapon exploded upon impact. In July 1959 a C-124 crashed near Bossier City, Louisiana. Both plane and nuclear weapon were destroyed. In October 1959 a B-52 with two nuclear weapons was involved in a mid-air collision near Hardinsburg, Kentucky. One weapon partially burned. In January 1961 a B-52 broke apart in mid-air near Goldsboro, North Carolina. Two nuclear weapons were released. The parachute on one weapon malfunctioned, and contamination was spread over a wide area. The uranium core was never recovered. Daniel Ellsberg reported that detonation was a very real risk because five of six safety devices failed. In that month near Monticello, Idaho a B-52 carrying nuclear weapons exploded in mid-air. No information was made available as to the weapons. In March 1961 a B-52 with two nuclear weapons crashed near Yuba City, California. In January 1964 a B-52 carrying two nuclear weapons crashed near Cumberland, Maryland. In January 1966 a B-52 carrying four hydrogen bombs crashed after a mid-air collision near Palomares, Spain. Two weapons exploded on impact, with resulting plutonium contamination. A months-long program was undertaken to locate and extract the other two weapons from the ocean. Major policy changes were taken under consideration. In January 1968 a B-52 carrying four hydrogen weapons crashed and burned near Thule AFB in Greenland. Explosives in one bomb detonated, spreading plutonium contamination. Apparently, the other three weapons have never been accounted for. Following large public protests Denmark, which owns Greenland and prohibits nuclear weapons on or over its territory, filed a strong protest. A few days later the Secretary of Defense ordered the removal of nuclear weapons from planes. After that order was issued, all aircraft armed with nuclear weapons were grounded but kept in a constant state of alert. In 1991 by Presidential order, nuclear weapons were removed from all aircraft. Bomber nuclear ground alerts, during which nuclear weapons are loaded onto bombers during test and training exercises, were halted. After that time, all nuclear weapons to be delivered by plane were permanently maintained in secure storage facilities. August 30, 2007 All of which makes the transport of nuclear weapons in combat position on a combat plane so newsworthy. On August 30, for the first time since 1968, nuclear warheads in combat position were carried by an American bomber. Numerous international treaty provisions were violated in the process. A total of 460 units were manufactured by Raytheon. A total of 394 units are currently maintained by the Air Force. Apparently, 38 are to be modernized and upgraded in Fiscal Year 2008 and the other 356 are to be decommissioned pursuant to the 2002 Moscow treaty. Raytheon has publicly announced the AGM-129 missiles are to be modified to accomplish a "classified cruise missile mission". This has widely been interpreted to mean conversion to bunker-busters, most likely for use in Iran. This widely accepted explanation is being used to explain why armed cruise missiles are being flown in American airspace. Nuclear Warheads The AGM-129 was specifically designed to deliver a W-80 nuclear warhead. The W-80 weapon has a variable yield capability, of 5 to 150 kilotons. For comparison purposes, the bomb used on Hiroshima was 13 to 15 kilotons, or equivalent to 13,000 to 15,000 tons of TNT explosive. News Stories and Flawed Explanations The story of the B-52 flight was first reported by Army Times, owned by Gannett, on Wednesday September 5. Gannett relied on information provided by "anonymous officers". The story was picked up by Yahoo Wednesday morning, published by USA Today and The Washington PosT, and then quickly spread. In response, the Pentagon quickly spread an official explanation. The Air Force admitted to an inadvertent error: The intent was to transport ACMs without weapons. According to military officers, the nuclear warheads should have been removed before the missiles were mounted on the pylons under the wings of the bomber. In the words of the Pentagon: "There was an error which occurred during a regularly scheduled transfer of weapons between two bases. The weapons were safe and remained in Air Force control and custody at all times." For almost the first time in the history of the nation, the military has publicly and promptly admitted it "made a mistake". This in itself is truly astounding. To reinforce the military's claim that a mistake was made, a system-wide stand-down was ordered for September 14. That official explanation was quickly explained away. The mistake was made intentionally, so a "deliberate leak" of a secret operation could occur. The CIA and the Office of Counter-Terrorism in the State Department explained that Barksdale AFB is a "jumping off point" for re-supply of the Middle East. The "deliberate leak" was intended to serve as a veiled warning to Iran. This deliberately misleading explanation is evidently intended to lead the public or Iran or both to logically conclude the missiles are bound for Iran. Bluntly, State and the CIA converted a whistleblower leak by true American patriots into a deliberate leak by official Washington, to scare Iran. By this means Washington has led the public to forget or overlook the real issue. To begin, the multiple official explanations reek to high heaven. They collectively read suspiciously like flimsy cover stories concocted in hasty desperation. And no amount of pretty lipstick will be able to make the official explanations pretty. Transportation Violations More conflicting explanations followed. These missiles are part of a group scheduled to be decommissioned. This would explain why they were shipped out of North Dakota. But the missiles were not transported on their way to decommissioning. Missiles are normally decommissioned at Davis-Monthan AFB at Tucson. Nuclear weapons are decommissioned at the Department of Energy's Pantex facility near Amarillo, Texas, accessed through Kirkland AFB in New Mexico. And military policy requires minimization of the number of flights made with nuclear weapons aboard. So the weapons should not have been mounted on the missiles, flown to Louisiana, un-mounted and flown to New Mexico. The mode of transportation is also a major issue not defused by official explanations. Per standard operating procedures, or SOPs, both missiles and nuclear warheads are transported primarily by air, in specially modified C-130s or C-17s. Under no peacetime circumstances do military SOPs allow transport of nuclear weapons mounted in cruise missiles mounted in combat positions on combat planes. Department of Defense Directive Number 4540.5, issued on February 4, 1998, regulates logistic transportation of nuclear weapons. By delegation of Commanders of Combatant Commands, movement of nuclear weapons must be approved by commanders of major service commands. Commanders of Combat Commands or service component commanders must evaluate, authorize and approve transport modes and movement routes for nuclear weapons in their custody. The Air Force is required to maintain a Prime Nuclear Airlift Force capability to conduct the logistic transport of nuclear weapons. Under SOPs, combat planes with combat-ready nuclear weapons can only be flown on the authority of the Commander in Chief, the Joint Chiefs of Staff or the National Military Command Authority. All of these transportation regulations were flagrantly violated on August 30. Handling Violations Violations of regulations concerning handling of the nuclear weapons in North Dakota are worse. A sophisticated computerized tracking system is used for nuclear weapons. Multiple sign-offs are required to remove the weapons from their storage bunkers. The AGM-129 Advanced Cruise Missile was designed to carry nuclear weapons. No non-nuclear warhead is available for this missile. So the only possible error could have been loading nuclear warheads on the missiles instead of practice dummies. The practice warheads have standard blue and yellow signs declaring "Inert, non-nuclear". The nuclear warheads have at least three distinctive red warning signs. This error is therefore highly improbable, absent tampering with signage. Nuclear weapons are transported from the storage bunker to the aircraft in a caravan that routinely includes vehicles with machine guns front and rear and guards with M-16s. All steps in the process are done under the watchful eyes of armed military police. Rules require that at least two people jointly control every step of the process. If one person loses sight of the other, both are forced to the ground face-down and temporarily "placed under arrest" by observant security forces. All progress stops until inspections are made to assure the weapons weren't tampered with. All nuclear weapons are connected to sophisticated alarm systems to prevent removal or tampering. They could only be removed from the storage bunker by turning the alarm off. And the squad commander clearly would not have authority to turn off the alarm. The Impossible Mistake Bluntly, the mistake of loading nuclear weapons on a combat aircraft in combat-ready position is simply not possible to make. Safeguards are far too stringent and far too many people would be involved. Particularly given that the mounting was in violation of policy that's been in place without exception for almost 40 years. No discipline is expected to be meted out. The New York Times tried to imply the commanding general had been fired. Actually, the squad commander in charge of munitions crews at Minot was "relieved of duty pending an investigation". He has not been removed from his position or disciplined. The crews involved have been "temporarily decertified pending corrective actions or additional training" but have not been disciplined. No mention has been made of the wing commander. Note carefully: These actions amount to nothing at all. The wing and squad commanders are still in place and the crews can easily be re-certified. Successful Confusion Washington's efforts to confuse the public have been successful. Attention has shifted from the crucial issue. This news has already become non-news. The August 14 stand-down will momentarily become news, followed by announcements of more stringent restrictions, improved safeguards and additional training. The public always has been and always will be safe. One of the major issues will be avoided: Someone in an irregular chain of Air Force command authorized loading and transport of nuclear weapons. And that would never have been done without a reason. Given the magnitude of regulatory violations involved, the reason must be extremely important. The paramount issue will be avoided, if necessary with repetition of the reassurance that the Air Force was in control at all times. The weapons were only missing during the 3.5-hour flight. At Barksdale, the missiles were considered to be unarmed items headed for modernization or the scrap heap, and of no particular importance. They were left unguarded for almost ten hours. According to one report, almost ten hours were required for airmen at Minot AFB to convince superiors that the nuclear weapons had disappeared. According to information provided to Congress, this time lapsed before airmen at Barksdale "noticed" the weapons were present. News reports will continue to overlook this fact also. Even here the focus is on time. The number of missiles and warheads issue was overlooked. Early news reports spoke of five nuclear warheads loaded onto the bomber. Apparently, this information was provided from Barksdale. That number was later updated to six weapons missing from Minot, apparently based on anonymous tips provided to Military Times by people at Minot. This information has also been forgotten. Conclusion Six nuclear weapons disappeared from Minot AFB in North Dakota. Five nuclear weapons were discovered at Barksdale AFB in Louisiana. Which leads to my chilling conclusion: Someone, operating under a special chain of command within the United States Air Force, just stole a nuclear weapon. What next? The answer has been provided several times, most recently by CIA Director and General Michael Hayden. On September 7, dressed in full military uniform, Hayden told assembled members of the Council of Foreign Relations: "Our analysts assess with high confidence that al-Qaida's central leadership is planning high-impact plots against the U. S. homeland." "We assess with high confidence that al-Qaida is focusing on targets that would produce mass casualties, dramatic destruction and significant aftershocks." An eye for an eye. Use of nukes will justify use of nukes. A perfect excuse to wage nuclear war against Iran. I suspect Hayden is absolutely correct, except for his mistaken identification of the "central leadership" that is planning detonation of a nuclear weapon on American soil. Air Force secretary being briefed on why B-52 flew nukes over U.S. Created: September 14, 2007 The week after a B-52 mistakenly loaded with nuclear weapons was flown to Barksdale Air Force Base, the secretary of the Air Force was to meet with officials at Minot Air Force Base, N.D., today to review procedures for handling nuclear weapons. Michael Wynne's visit comes amid an ongoing investigation into why the B-52 bomber from Minot was mistakenly armed with six nuclear warheads last month and flown across several states to Bossier City. The B-52 sat on a runway at Barksdale for 10 hours before it was discovered that six of the cruise missiles under its wings had nuclear warheads attached, Pentagon officials told members of Congress. "Secretary Wynne takes the recent breakdown in the munitions system very seriously and is committed to ensuring munitions processes are safe, secure and absolutely reliable," a statement from Minot said. All indications are that it was an "isolated mistake," Pentagon officials said. Air Force officials said the warheads were not activated and never posed a public threat. They also said they were concerned that the warheads were unaccounted for several hours while the bomber flew across the country. The B-52 was transporting a dozen cruise missiles to Barksdale. It happened on Aug. 30. (The Associated Press contributed to this report) Did Military Leak Foil Attempt To Bomb Iran? By Michael E. Salla, MA, PhD 9-16-7 Critically exploring whether or not there was a covert attempt to instigate a catastrophic nuclear war against Iran is illuminated through an introduction using the recent B-52 Incident. On August 30, a B-52 bomber armed with five nuclear-tipped Advanced Cruise missiles travelled from Minot Air Force base, North Dakota, to Barksdale Air Force base, Louisiana, in the United States. Each missile had an adjustable yield between five and 150 kilotons of TNT which is at the lower end of the destructive capacities of U.S. nuclear weapons. For example, the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima had a yield of 13 kilotons, while the Bravo Hydrogen bomb test of 1954 had a yield of 15,000 kilotons. The B-52 story was first covered in the Army Times on 5 September after the nuclear armed aircraft was discovered by Airmen. http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/09/marine_nuclear_B52_070904w/ What made this a very significant event was that it was a violation of U.S. Air Force regulations concerning the transportation of nuclear weapons by air. Nuclear weapons are normally transported by air in specially constructed planes designed to prevent radioactive pollution in case of a crash. Such transport planes are not equipped to launch the nuclear weapons they routinely carry around the U.S. and the world for servicing or positioning. The discovery of the nuclear armed B-52 was, according to Hans Kristensen, a nuclear weapons expert at the Federation of American Scientists, the first time in 40 years that a nuclear armed plane had been allowed to fly in the U.S. http://www.nti.org/d_newswire/issues/2007_9_5.html#149D6ECF Since 1968, after a SAC bomber crashed in Greenland, all nuclear armed aircraft have been grounded but were kept on a constant state of alert. After the end of the Cold War, President George H. Bush ordered in 1991 that nuclear weapons were to be removed from all aircraft and stored in nearby facilities. Recently, the Air Force began decommissioning its stockpile of Advanced Cruise missiles. The five nuclear weapons on the B-52 were to be decommissioned, and were to be taken to another Air Force base. An Air Force press statement issued on 6 September 2007, claimed that there "was an error which occurred during a regularly scheduled transfer of weapons between two bases." Furthermore, the statement declared: "The Air Force maintains the highest standards of safety and precision so any deviation from these well established munitions procedures is considered very serious." The issue concerning how a nuclear armed B-52 bomber was allowed to take off and fly in U.S. air space after an 'error' in a routine transfer process, is now subject to an official Air Force inquiry which is due to be completed by September 14. Three key questions emerge over the B-52 incident. First, did Air Force personnel at Minot AFB not spot the 'error' earlier given the elaborate security procedures in place to prevent such mistakes from occurring? Many military analysts have commented on the stringent security procedures in place to prevent this sort of mistake from occurring. Multiple officers are routinely involved in the transportation and loading of nuclear weapons to prevent the kind of 'error' that allegedly occurred in the B-52 incident. According to the U.S. Air Force statement, the commanding officer in charge of military munitions personnel and additional munitions airmen were relieved of duties pending the completion of the investigation. According to Kristensen, the error could not have come from confusing the Advanced Cruise Missile with a conventional weapons since no conventional form exists. So the munitions Airmen should have been easily able to spot the mistake. Other routine procedures were violated which suggests a rather obvious explanation for the error. The military munitions personnel were acting under direct orders, though not through the regular chain of military command. This takes me to the second question. Who was in Charge of the B-52 Incident? Who ordered the loading of Advanced Cruise missiles on to a B-52 in violation of Air Force regulations? The quick reaction of the Air Force and the issuing of a public statement describing the seriousness of the issue and the launch of an immediate investigation, suggests that whatever occurred, was outside the regular chain of military command. If the regular chain of command was violated, then we have to inquire as to whether the B-52 incident was part of a covert project whose classification level exceeded that held by officers in charge of nuclear weapons at Minot AFB. http://www.rense.com/general78/milleak.htm How Chinese Military Hackers Took Control of a Nuclear Loaded B-52 !!!! This is the case of the "Mistakenly Loaded" 6/5 ? Nuclear Cruise Missiles that caused a complete shutdown of the U.S. Air force on Sept.14 to do a survey of what happened. The answer The U.S. had China make custom made electronic chips for military computers (to save money ?) and the Chinese built in back doors where they could take control of the computers. Now the U.S. military will not know if an order to Nuke a target came from them or China. In case you missed this the first time around - Long But you Must read it. We are Toast ! Command Override How Chinese Military Hackers Took Control of a Nuclear Loaded B-52 !!!! Address: http://www.willthomasonline.net/willthomasonline/Command_Override.html It is the absolute responsibility of everybody in uniform to disobey an order that is either illegal or immoral." -General Peter Pace, Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff addressing the National Press Club, Feb 17/06 COMMAND OVERRIDE How Chinese Military Hackers Took Over A Nuclear-Armed B52 By William Thoma The story sounded like a sequel to "Dr. Strangelove". Leaked by the Pentagon's news service, Military Affairs to quell scuttlebutt racing through the ranks-and perhaps warn the world-a U.S. Air Force B-52 strategic bomber "mistakenly" loaded with six nuclear cruise missiles took off from Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota on August 30, 2007 and flew for more than three hours over at least five states, before landing at Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana. The mistake was so egregious, the National Command Authority comprising President George BU.S.h and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates were quickly informed. The SecDef has since been assured that nuclear weapons "were part of a routine transfer between the two bases... at no time was the public in danger." Both statements are false. In fact, nuclear weapons like these are carefully crated for shipment between bases, and placed inside the bomb bays or cargo compartments of transporting aircraft. In stunning contrast, this reporter has learned from two independent and highly placed sources that the six Advanced Cruise Missiles dangling from the B-52's fatigued and flexible wings were fully armed and ready to fire-except for a single fail/safe switch under the Command Pilot's control. The quickly blacked out episode has prompted an Air Force investigation. Gates, whose official defense computer was hacked last June, necessitating the shutdown of the entire SecDef network, has ordered daily briefings on the Air Force inquiry. The Minot base commander, who might turn out to be the hero in this frightening affair, was relieved of his command. DR. STRANGELOVE VISITS BOURBON STREET As far as anyone knows, no U.S. aircraft has ever been armed with a full wartime loadout of six nuclear weapons. "Nothing like this has ever been reported before and we have been assured for decades that it was impossible," declared Representative Markey, co-chair of the House Task Force on Nonproliferation. Hans Kristensen, an expert on U.S. nuclear forces, says he knows of no other publicly acknowledged case of live nuclear weapons being flown on bombers since the late 1960s. Director Stanley Kubrick's "Dr. Strangelove Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb" was released in 1964 Each of the six ACMs carried a "dialable" 150-kiloton W80-1 warhead--for a combined total of 60-times the destructive power of the bomb that melted the city and inhabitants of Hiroshima--over the unsuspecting residents of five states. Depending on the route flown, a half-dozen armed nuclear weapons wafted for three-and-a-half hours over North Dakota and either South Dakota or Minnesota, Nebraska or Missouri, Oklahoma or Arkansas, and Louisiana. It's no secret that Dick Cheney and his presidential surrogate intend to bomb Iran into the Kingdom to Come. But New Orleans? "What does the government have against Louisiana?" asked a blogger named Lobster Martini. TOUGH LOVE The "mistake" was supposedly discovered when the B-52 landed at Barskdale, where the plane should have been secured by an armed security detail. Instead, it simply parked on the flight line, where ground crew noticed the words "nuclear armed" stenciled on the sides of the missiles. Three officers confirmed the warheads were, in Bush's argot, "nucular." But the mission could have ended in a "broken arrow" nuclear calamity if the bomber had crashed, or inadvertently dropped its ordnance. Munitions, and even entire engines-such as the No. 1 turbine that fell off an American Airlines DC 10 after taking off from Chicago's O'Hare airport in May, 1979, killing two people on the ground and all 271 people onboard-occasionally drop from underwing pylons in flight. A few other examples: -- A B-36 ferrying a nuclear weapon from Biggs Air Force Base, Texas to Kirtland accidentally drops a bomb in the New Mexico desert. -- A fighter pilot accidentally dropped a BDU-33 dummy bomb into a house, narrowly missing a family of three. -- A 500-pound bomb fell from an FA-18 plane during a routine training exercise and exploded on the edge of a U.S. base 100 miles north of Sarajevo. -- A National Guard F-16 fighter jet on a nighttime training mission strafed an elementary school in New Jersey with 25 rounds of depleted uranium ammunition. -- Another U.S. Air Force practice bomb accidentally on the Yorkshire countryside in England. -- Electromagnetic interference from military transmitters may have caused an F-16 jet to accidentally drop a 500 pound bomb on rural West Georgia. A crash, mid-air explosion or structural breakup-not uncommon occurrences with heavily-laden B-52s-could have ignited the high explosives used to implode the warheads. The ultimate dirty bomber's fantasy could have seen plutonium--the deadliest substance ever conjured by humans-raining down over what would become a statewide "national sacrifice zone", off-limits to all life-forms for more than 4 billion years. Barksdale AFB is no stranger to nuclear accidents. On July 6, 1959, a C-124 "Flying Boxcar" crashed on takeoff, completely destroying the aircraft and the nuclear weapon it was carrying. ] PROTOCOLS The Air Combat Command has ordered a command-wide stand down for September 14, 2007 to "review procedures." Though they actually responded flawlessly to apparently authentic orders, the highly trained specialists who carried out the nuclear loadout have been temporarily "decertified" from handling nukes. Representative Ike Skelton, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, called the mishandling of arms capable of destroying cities "deeply disturbing. There is no more serious issue than the security and proper handling of nuclear weapons." The crewdogs who flew their assigned mission without mishap have been ordered not to mention that all pilots are required to perform a "walk around" inspection of their airplanes and calculate elaborate "weight-and-balance" graphs before attempting to aviate. Failure to notice or be informed of the much heavier nuclear casings on the missiles they were carrying would have jeopardized flight safety. According to a well-informed and extremely thorough U.S. military source I call "Hank" (with whom I have broken major stories over the past 15 years), someone "must have adjusted the bomber's balance. It had to have been done." In addition to knowing what is externally attached to their airplane, the amount of paperwork, signatures, and discrete passwords involved in releasing a nuclear weapon from its storage bunker and loading it onto an airframe are more formidable than flak. And there were six of them. PICKUP AND DELIVERY The coded message to upload and launch the B-52 from Minot with six live nuclear weapons carried the signature of the "football" containing the day's nuclear launch codes that is carried close to the president at all times by a specially detailed aide. After checking and counter-checking their coded orders, as few as a dozen people in uniform were actually involved in the subsequent secret nuclear mission. According to Hank, at least three high-ranking officers were escorted into Minot AFB's nuclear arms bunker after passing through multiple doors secured by pass codes, whose complete sequences were supplied each officer, who only knew part of each code. One hiccup, a fumbled code sequence, or "the wrong wrench" would have cancelled the loadout instantly. SAFETY FIRST Because the base had stood down for Labor Day, the timing was ideal for security. In his standing orders for August 30, 2007, 5th Bomb Wing commander Colonel Bruce Emig encouraged his troops to "Enjoy a safe Labor Day weekend. "Warbirds, It's hard to believe that Labor Day weekend is already here!" the colonel wrote. "Though cooler temperatures are right around the corner, the weather forecasters tell me that we should have a warm, summer-like weekend. Since Air Combat Command and Air Force Space Command have declared Friday a Family Day, many of you should be able to enjoy a nice, 4-day break as we transition from summer to fall. I wish all of you a relaxing and enjoyable time off, and urge you all once again to please keep safety in mind in all you do!" Under a bomber's nuclear umbrella in a discrete corner of the sprawling airbase, air, ground and ordnance crews did not converse with each other. Or anyone else. Everyone involved knew better than to ask questions that could abruptly end their careers by inadvertently tipping people who did not need to know. LOADOUT Within hours, an airplane with a wingspan longer than the Wright Brothers' first flight was safely loaded with avgas, sandwiches, and six nuclear weapons. Uploaded to the bomber using an accordion cradle on each missile trolley, each Advanced Cruise Missile was fueled once it was secured to a hard point under the aircraft's wings. Because the ACMs were not inside a bomb bay, where they could be armed in flight, each underslung missile had to be fully armed before takeoff. "Wing walker" is not a B-52 job description. The plates connecting the firing circuits of each warhead to the cockpit were then activated, and the safeties were pulled from each clearly marked "nuclear weapon"-rendering it "live". For the Explosive Ordnance Disposal detail who performed the loadout, there could be no doubt they were activating six nuclear weapons. Alarms on the flight line should have sounded as soon as they sniffed hot ions leaking from the pulled pile rods in six slowly fissioning warheads. But the alarms remain silenced. That order, Hank insisted, could only have come under the properly coded signature of the National Command Authority-Commander-in-Chief G.W. Bush or Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates. The ensuing takeoff was an event branded on the central nervous system of every creature in auditory range as eight jet engines at maximum takeoff thrust levitated six missiles, up to 46,000 gallons of fuel, and an airplane the length of a 150-foot ship into a blue yonder that had just become much wilder. Everyone within miles knew that a B-52 had come into Minot and taken off again. But only God and the devil knew where it was going. And they weren't saying. WHO DUNNIT? In the silence left by this momentous departure, if there were questions, nobody voiced them. Perhaps there were a few quietly delivered high-fives instead. Despite the high stress that runs counter to every human instinct, everyone involved had carried out their assigned duties with complete attention to the details required to launch a half-dozen live nuclear weapons "safely". The professionally conducted operation was carried off in complete secrecy, without a hitch, only after the loadout and launch order had been digitally confirmed as coming from the NCA. There was only one problem regarding the originators of those orders, Hank emailed me: "IT WAS NOT US." FAULTY (COMPUTER) TOWERS Let us quickly review. My earlier exclusive on my former website, willthomas.net, disclosed how in October 2006, North Korea's leaders asked China to take out Japan's shiny new recon satellite before it could be tasked by American officers to monitor Pyongyang's first atomic test. Blowing up someone's satellite is an act of war. But overriding its "Made In China" microchips with a remote command from the ground could never be proven. Even if no solar flares were recorded at the time. This first Chinese demo got the Pentagon's attention. After all, their stated goal of "Full Spectrum Dominance" over Earth's land, seas, airspace and electromagnetic spectrum depends on America's successful weaponization of space. But as the Joint Chiefs are only now discovering, many of the supposedly secure chips in America's civilian infrastructure-as well as all military communications, surveillance and weapons systems-have been "Wal-Marted" by U.S. corporations to low-bid Chinese suppliers-who rigged them for failure or takeover by "command override" in the event of war. "Faulty Microchips Threaten U.S. Attack On Iran" ] SEE DICK RUN The second demonstration of China's newfound capabilities to manipulate microchips came in late February 2007, when Dick Cheney's 757, flying home from Australia where the Vice President had not been well received by the locals, was forced to divert to Singapore. In a story intriguingly tagged, "U.S. Denies Cheney Forced To Land," Agence France-Presse reported that the White House admitted the Vice-President's "specially secured" Boeing 757 had "suffered electrical problems" before landing in Singapore. But Cheney spinner Lea Anne McBride insisted, "This was the preplanned, scheduled refueling stop. We were not diverted. The vice president did not get off the plane during his refueling stop." Wrong again. According to U.S. military personnel present on the tarmac at Paya Lebar Air Base-who according to Hank said were "trying to yak with the locals: 'Can you get us this part? Do you have a Radio Shack?'"-a small Chinese delegation met with Cheney outside his electronically-challenged aircraft. Wandering in and out of the brief conversation, Hank's sources described the brief encounter, which occurred shortly after 1400 hours Singapore time. Disembarking Air Force One, Cheney said something like, "Gosh, we got this kind of interesting problem..." "No, you don't understand sir," a Chinese official interrupted. "This is how we brought you here. And this is why." Cheney's visitors itemized the separately wired galley stoves, reading lights, in-flight video, and power outlets onboard the Vice President's aircraft that had all conked out in flight. They knew this, they said, because the electronic signals that had disabled the microchips controlling these various devices had been directed by their government. In an impressive feat, the Chinese military had located and selectively targeted a stealthy aircraft painted with radar-absorbent materials flying at nearly 500 knots at 35,000 feet without a public itinerary. According to Hank's boots-on-the-tarmac sources, the mostly one-way conversation in Singapore concerned "Gulf of Tonkin possibilities." "They reached out and touched someone," Hank related. "They had a message they wanted to get across: 'You've got ships out there in the Gulf. If this thing cooks off, all bets are off because some of the things that are put out there, we are really now wanting people to talk about.'" The Chinese were referring to their control of most of the microchips on this planet. A very thoughtful Dick Cheney departed two hours later. OPENING THE GATES The next Chinese digital demo came last June. In what came to be called "the most successful cyber attack ever mounted on the U.S. defence department," Chinese military hacked into a Pentagon computer network serving the defense secretary's personal office. Like their American counterparts, the People's Liberation Army (PLA) regularly probes U.S. military networks. But American officials said these latest cyber attack caused grave concern when China demonstrated it "could disrupt U.S. defenses systems at critical times." "The PLA has demonstrated the ability to conduct attacks that disable our system... and the ability in a conflict situation to re-enter and disrupt on a very large scale," revealed a former official, adding that the PLA has also penetrated the networks of U.S. arms corporations and war-launching think-tanks. A Chinese official named Jiang repeated his government's denial that it had penetrated other government and military computer networks. But British and German newspapers cited intelligence and other officials saying that government and military networks in Germany, the United States and Britain had been broken into by Chinese army hackers this summer. According to the Associated Press: "China's military has openly discussed using cyber attacks as a means of harrying or defeating a more powerful conventional military. In a 1999 paper on unconventional strategies titled 'Unlimited Warfare' two top Chinese military figures wrote that a hacker could have more power than a nuclear bomb." In a report this year, security software maker Symantec Corp. listed China as having the second most malicious computer activity in the world-after the United States. Speaking as a soldier, Hank commented, "The June hack showed an enormous hole in our ability to protect and communicate our information. LOST IN SPACE The next hack came almost immediately, when Russian computers controlling the International Space Station's orientation and supplies of oxygen and water inexplicably failed while the station's three crewmembers were hosting seven visiting shuttle astronauts. Among the station's network of six Russian computers, only two remained functioning. A system-wide re-boot usually resolved smaller hitches, But this time, the system was unable to re-boot. "A failure of this type has not occurred before," the BBC reported. "This is serious," stated James Oberg, a retired rocket scientist turned author and consultant. "These computers run their life support, so if they can't be restored, the space station could become uninhabitable." Oberg added, "Statistically, this is not random. There is some new environmental factor that must identified and isolated, and neither step is trivial." Russian flight controllers and onboard engineers traced the problem to "odd readings" in electrical power cables feeding the Russian computers through a corroded junction box labeled BOK 3. The gremlins returned to the Russian machines on February 5, when another ISS computer system crashed in the Zvezda Service Module that routes data between orientation sensors and four positioning gyroscopes. The space station's solar power stopped supplying power, and communications were cut with Earth. Though power and comms were restored three hours later, New Scientist reports, "The cause of the computer crash remains a mystery. NASA has so far not identified the cause of the crash." But Hank was on it. "They had limited oxygen, a limited time frame," he observed. The astronauts onboard the space station didn't know if the next computer malfunction "would open an airlock." But like an airliner in flight, the station should have smoothly shifted over to backup systems. It didn't. "The word 'redundancy' never got into the story," Hank pointed out. Instead, all three backup circuit boards wired into three isolated circuits, "had to blow out in the same way at the exact same time. The fault that occurred in the first board, the second board, and the third board all had to be the same damn thing at the same damn time." "Impossible," he declared. Especially, since each of the simultaneously faulty microchips had been "stress tested to hell and back. Except for internal stressors." Except for "Made In China" microchip mischief. While it is not yet confirmed that the February 5 microchip malfunction was related to the June 14 space station hack, according to Hank's sources, on that earlier date the Chinese pulled the equivalent of Cheney's Singapore diversion--in space. "Nobody got busted for it," he adds. "You always hear about the company at fault." Not this time. AC WE SEE While White House fundamentalists remained mesmerized by the firepower ostensibly under their command, Beijing kept trying to send a very different message. Their next installment came in early September 2007, when U.S. Air Force officers passed through multiple levels of security and entered the inner computer sanctum of America's Air and Space Command deep under Cheyenne Mountain. This digital repository stores regularly updates archives needed to execute "clean reinstalls" in case air force computer systems crash or are otherwise compromised. Entering the quietly humming room, the air force officers were shocked to see monitors aglow with light. The displays were supposed to be off. As they watched in shock and awe, randomly typed letters scrolled across a screen. The words were gibberish. But the message was heart-stoppingly clear: "We Can Play With Your Toys!" The sender "left breadcrumbs," Hank related. The deliberately attached ISP (Internet Service Provider) pointed to China. This was bad enough. But what really freaked out the officers was the realization that none of these "stand alone" machines was online. None of them contained a modem! The only way to access these machines, Hank revealed, is to "use the sneaker net to walk up to it and tap on the keyboard. And yet they were interacting, and they were doing it in real time. They fussed with our stuff. These guys were able to go into what was a stand alone system and take control of it." How did the PLA hack supposedly secure air force computers lacking network modems? Just like as select power companies can now pipe the Internet to home computers through electrical power lines, the Chinese were able to play on SAC's supposedly secure computers through the AC power cables connecting them to the national power... "grid". But how did they break supposedly "unbreakable" military encryption? And how were they able to transmit signals to override specific chips buried under a mountain of granite halfway around the globe? According to Hank, the International Space Station was not in line-of-sight with China when it's onboard computers and back-up systems simultaneously went down. HIT MAN When it comes to dialing up a bomber to drop nuclear weapons on another country, "It's kind of like hiring a hit man," Hank explained. You meet him in the parking lot with the assignment, a weapon, and cash. Later, you confirm that you haven't changed your mind. Then the mission proceeds, and either the target or the hit man is taken out. In the case of the mission out of Minot, the First Phase began with an initiation order authorizing weapons release to arm a B-52 specially flown in for this operation. Proper codes and paperwork provided the Pilot in Command with an initial heading to fly, and initial waypoints or nav points to punch into the plane's GPS. No destination was provided. The pilots were just supposed to get in and drive. They did. Once the B-52 was airborne, it flew into an electronic black hole. No electromagnetic emissions came from the bomber. There were no radio calls to home base asking, "Are you guys sure you really want to do this?" Even more startling, no coded IFF squawks identified the BUFF (Big Ugly Fat F---r) as friendly to prowling post-9/11 fighters. And no transponder beeps identified the airplane and its mission. This is not the normal procedure for transporting weapons, or flying a B-52 through heavily-trafficked air corridors over the Continental United States. Every aircraft flying at high altitudes over CONUS, (or through Controlled Airspace around airports at lower attitudes) must transmit their identity on an assigned transponder frequency. Commercial planes squawk in their own dialect. "When you're talking a government vehicle, like a C-130 , that's another level up," Hank noted. "It's a different kind of squawk. ATC knows how to treat that kind of traffic differently. A B-52 is another level up. Controllers don't see that every day. A C-5 -they really don't see that every day." The transponder code of the B-52 out of Minot would have prioritized it to civilian Air Traffic Control, and they would have cleared a corridor for its exclusive track-much like a presidential motorcade. If this Bad Boy had been transferring six advanced nuclear cruise missiles to Barksdale, as official spin insisted, its transponder would have squawked: "Hey, guess what? We've got nukes onboard! Make sure no one runs into us. And if this signal stops scramble recovery people wearing proper attire." Or code to that effect. But this did not happen. "The Situation Room in the White House was not stood up, but they still have people there,? Hank continued. ?One of their jobs is to track nuclear weapons. Somebody in that head shed should have seen a transponder code matched up with nuclear weapons loaded onto that aircraft. That should have been something that went up on the board. They would have known that a B-52 was getting a full loadout, and that all procedures had been followed. And someone else would have said, ' Mmm , six nukes. We'll keep an eye on it." And given an order for radar operators to push a button to highlight that particular blip. Instead, the blacked-out BUFF flew on. TARGET IRAN High in the stratosphere, where the nitrous oxide exhaust from eight fuel-hungry turbines attacked this planet's shredding ozone layer, boosting global warming another notch toward a catastrophic methane meltdown, wings never designed to carry heavy ordnance flexed up and down like a bird in flight. The crew must have considered the long roster of crashed Stratofortress with ?broken arrows? onboard. Not for a second could they forget that the six live nuclear weapons strapped to their wings were as close to detonation as a gremlin's wet dream. Or the fail-safe switch under the Plane Commander's gloves. An hour or two out of Minot, a bell chimed in the cockpit and a secure printer spat out a coded paper message. Even if they betrayed no emotion, the pilots must have felt a chill. Because the mission's next critical Fail-Safe had been passed. "We've thought about it, and the mission is still a go," the message essentially read. If these new orders had not been received, or had been issued incorrectly, the plane would have immediately turned back to the nearest base capable of handling its special needs. But their orders were in order. Positively authenticated by both pilots as coming from the NCA, the new message received onboard the bomber issued the radio frequencies, call signs and rendezvous coordinates for "hitting" one of three aerial refueling planes constantly orbiting over the Gulf of Mexico. Their new "Go Code" also identified their target region. After topping off their tanks, they were to take up a heading for another Gulf, half a world away. BLIND MAN'S BUFF Wouldn't the base commander, or the other officers involved in sending live nuclear weapons toward Iran have second thoughts about a strike that could trigger an even bigger political-military chain reaction? Not necessarily, Hank explained. Military leaders usually favor intimidation in place of bloodshed. If the Iranians could be dissuaded from acquiring a nuclear deterrent of their own, or decide to stop supplying their Shiite brothers next door with sophisticated shaped-charge rockets capable of penetrating the depleted uranium hides of M-1 Abrams tanks-terrific! Everyone involved in the mission must have hoped that in this high-stakes brinksmanship, when Iranian sensors picked up the radioactive signature of an inbound American nuclear bomber strike, the mullahs in Teheran would burn their Korans and turn to Jesus. On the other hand, how do you say "pissed off" in Persian? The mullahs might panic and start pushing buttons of their own. Especially when the Israeli Air Force was notified of the strike, and launched "supporting" fighter-bombers of their own. In any case, it was out of the hands of the base commander and his immediate superiors. Since any one of these key staff officers could conceivably be kidnapped or impersonated during a nuclear strike, none had the authority to issue a recall order. Even if someone in the chain of command issued an RTB (Return To Base), SAC bomber crews en route to the final IP coordinates to commence their attack are trained to ignore all such entreaties. In fact, a frantic "Come home for lunch," or "Call your wife" command would confirm for the crew that something really was amiss, and they were at war. In this way, a series of rote military assumptions can make an ash out of you and me. WHAT, ME WORRY? Meanwhile, the man under whose digitally coded authority this strike was being carried out, remained completely unaware that six nuclear cruise missiles with his name on them were headed toward Iran. Phase Three would have issued coded authorization to take out their assigned targets. One target confirmed by two highly placed, independent sources was a nuclear power plant hard against the mountains of Iran. "But the bomber would still have five missiles left. And it would not leave the area empty," Hank insisted. "If they go loaded for bear, they're not going to leave with a rabbit." After all, he added, a pre-BDA would have been done before launching the bomber "to determine how many it would take. And they needed six ?" Despite all the Hollywood hype, cruise missiles are notoriously inaccurate. Just ask the folks ducking strays in Kuwait or Iran. Still, a cruise missile striking within 30 miles would have taken out that Iranian power plant. But if the nuclear-tipped ACM had detonated over its pile? "Bad. Bad. Very bad," as Hank would say. Because the resulting electromagnetic pulses from such a synergistic chain reaction would have-- among other things--fried every unhardened Chinese microchip aboard every American ship, plane and vehicle in the Persian Gulf. "You don't have to sink the CAG, just turn it off," Hank said, referring to the formidable--yet completely microchip dependent--Carrier Air Group steaming off the coast of Iran. "Once they realized that these ships were just bobbing around out there," the bad guys would have "launched 10,000 rowboats" from surrounding shorelines to go play pirates. Was this why several Chinese Aegis destroyers were steaming in from the east about 250 nautical miles from the Straits of Hormuz? Was this why two or three Chinese submarines had been deployed to the area of the transiting destroyers the week before? Or were the two Chinese anti-aircraft destroyers part of an elaborate fail-safe in case the demonstration glitched and the bomber could not be recalled? Even if their anti-aircraft missiles could not reach the distant plane (easily tracked through its rigged Chinese chips), specific signals sent from the ship could have turned the plane around. Or its fuel off. What were the Chinese thinking? CHINESE CHECKERS Ever since Katrina, and the subsequent standing wave put up off the south coast of Africa by HAARP to deflect hurricanes from the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf Coasts, Beijing has felt under siege as earthquakes and wild, shipping-interrupting storms continue to be conducted "all the way to China" by the powerful Gakona, Alaskan transmitter. Three times, the Chinese have attempted to override HAARP. And failed. Elaborate demonstrations of their electronic warfare capabilities-- including fizzing circuits in space, and a face-to-face with the U.S. Vice-President in Singapore--had not persuaded American leaders to A: Refrain from hoisting a false flag over a Persian Gulf of Tonkin, and B: Turn HAARP off. Surely, Beijing must have reasoned, ordering a United State Air Force strategic bomber loaded out with six armed nuclear weapons to fly over the United States and then on towards Iran would conclusively demonstrate who was now in charge. "This op would not have 'Made In China' stamped all over it," Hank pointed out. "Instead, American bombs, American bombers and American systems were used." No matter how the mission had proceeded, if Washington had been forced to tell the world, "It wasn't us. We lost control of our bomber carrying six atomic warheads"--how would that have looked to a global audience already angry over America's misuse of its military might? Whatever Beijing's intentions, Hank was not the only person in the U.S. military to have his head rearranged by this latest Chinese demonstration. "They might have wanted to go all the way. Of they might have wanted to put pieces in play and see how far they could go," he surmised. "Maybe the Chinese started, and stopped it." Either way, the unauthorized Minot mission has bluntly shown the White House and the Pentagon: "If you start something, we can stop it. You no longer know how much control you have over your own weapons systems because we can play with them at will. No matter where you are, no matter what you're doing, if you're using our chips you are vulnerable. And you can't know if our Trojan chips are in your systems unless you tear apart every circuits in every surveillance, communications, weapons system, pipelines, telecom and power grid in your entire military and civilian inventory and look. And then dismantle every network they are connected to." "And one more thing," Beijing inferred, "If you take offense and pop off a missile, remember, we might make it do a loop-de-loop and come right back down on its originating silo." Hank and others in America's command hierarchy remain alarmed and puzzled-which makes them even more uneasy. Would China's leadership have precipitated a cloud of radioactive fallout downwind over their own population? Emphatically, yes . The country's generals have long counted an expendable population and land mass as key factors in "winning" a nuclear war. Best case scenario, this recent flight of fancy was a warning for Washington to chill the bomb Iran rhetoric, and dial down HAARP. "Maybe the Chinese got it right and they were just messin' with us," Hank mused. "Or they got it wrong, and something very bad almost happened. But why only one plane? Why stop there? It's a limited use of a system that is now exposed." But what can we do about it? And what a message it sent! "Cyber War"] RECALL Phase Three of the mission would have sent coded target grid coordinates and time(s) of weapon(s) release, as well as updates on weather over the area, enemy defense status and friendly escorts. Those orders never came. Instead, Phase Four was initiated. When the cockpit teleprinter spat out paper tape again, it read, in so many words: "Forget the whole thing. Abort the mission. Turn back." The only people capable of issuing a nuclear strike recall order would be the President, the Secretary of Defense, a specific designate of the SecDef authorized by special code. Or a Chinese military hacker. As Hank notes, "The plane had to be diverted to a base that could handle nuclear weapons." That would be Barksdale. But... "Live hot nukes would have tripped alarms on the tarmac when it touched down. Either they were nonfunctional on both ends , which is scary beyond belief considering what we're talking about." Or the Joint Chiefs or the NCA could have ordered the radiation sensors silenced to keep the mission-and the hijacked mission-under wraps. Or the Chinese could have turned them off. If the system is digital, Beijing probably controls it. Bottom line: if the incoming bomber had crashed approach, no one responding would have known they were dealing with a quiver-full of "broken arrows". BARKSDALE Thought the missiles were never launched, they still remain in play. As Hank worried, "Six nukes are now forward deployed to the air force base that handles Middle East ops." A former counter-terrorism expert with the CIA and the State Department shares his concern. Larry Johnson does not buy the official story that six nuclear weapons were "mistakenly" flown over the USA-not after a retired B-52 pilot reminded him. "The only time you put such weapons on a plane is when they are on alert, or if the crew has been tasked to move the weapons to a specific site." Besides running nuclear war exercises like the Global Guardian drill it ran on the morning of 9/11, Barksdale AFB deploys "heavies" to the Middle East. Like Hank, Johnson wants to know, "Why would we want to preposition nuclear weapons at a base conducting Middle East operations?" His pilot pal believes that an insider leaker tried to send up a bright red flag. Johnson asks, "Did someone at Barksdale try to indirectly warn the American people that the Bush Administration is staging nukes for Iran?" But Hank points out another problem. Cruise missiles-which are essentially autonomous, unpiloted drones-have special needs. Since six cruise missiles showing up at Barksdale were an oddity, can they be adequately stored and maintained there? The Gulf Coast is "a very different environment" than Nebraska, Hank emphasizes. How long is Barksdale going to hold onto them? In the hurricane season? "Are we going to see some of them floating out on the tide?" Hank wants to know. Americans need a big confirm that these weapons have been sent back north to a better home. Verify this story here 2007Audio: http://www.willthomasonline.net/willthomasonline/_RefFiles/B-52_takeoff.mp3 The Story That Never Was: The "Silencing" of the B-52 "Whistleblowers" by Timothy V. Gatto http://www.opednews.com It seems like somebody is throwing misinformation out to the Progressive community either to discredit us or to have us chase phony stories around that in effect, waste our time. I recently received information, and I see that many of us did, about the supposedly "dead" soldiers that helped to "out" the story on that B-52 that carried nuclear weapons from Minot AFB to Barksdale AFB. I heard about it from an e-mail that was sent by a good friend. Since I had just been burned by the "Amero" coin story in which I received information that the Denver mint had begun making "Amero's", I was suspicious and asked my friend to check his sources. Sure enough, my friend wrote that he had been duped again. The worst part of this saga is that he traced the story back to the same source that had released misinformation on the Amero! My source that I believe would rather be left nameless traced the original story that he got to another source. He actually called that source to find out where he got that information and it traced back to Hal Turner. The original article that wrote about the so-called "deaths" was on the Military Times website. Since Michael Hoffman wrote the article I called him today. Mr. Hoffman was very forthcoming and told me that he had two sources that told him about the story, and when he investigated it, he found that the two servicemen that perished, but that they had no connection whatsoever with the bomb-laden B-52. Mr. Hoffman also told me that he had received e-mail from Hal Turner about the article and he had advised Mr. Turner to remove the article from his website on the premise that he was disseminating fraudulent information. Apparently Hal Turner cares nothing for the truth as you can see here: http://www.halturnershow.com/index.html and that the story is still on his website. I have read a few articles, one here at Opednews.com that still maintain that the soldiers that turned the information over to the Military Times have been silenced...permanently. This is pure misinformation and Hal Turner along with all that jumped on this story should have checked their sources more thoroughly. This could have been a counter intelligence program designed to make anyone repeating this story look ridiculous. This isn't an isolated case. People that write articles should be very careful to check their sources, if at least two impeccable sources can't verify a story, that story should remain out of print until a second source has been verified. That's the way I see it. http://liberalpro.blogspot.com Former Chairman of the Liberal Party of America, Tim is a retired Army Sergeant. He currently lives in South Carolina. A regular contributor to OpEdNews, he is the author of Kimchee Kronicles and is currently at work on a new novel. Contact Author B-52 Nuke-Involved Airman Murdered? No Cause Of Death Listed Our Thanks To Ted Twietmeyer For Locating Airman Todd Blue's Obituary 9-17-7 Todd Alexander Blue Todd Alexander Blue, of Wytheville, Va. was born August 13, 1987 in Washington, D.C. to John Briggs and Patricia Blue. He departed this life on September 10, 2007. Todd graduated from George Wythe High School in 2005. After high school, he enlisted into the U.S. Air Force. While serving in the Air Force, Todd received many honors. He was stationed at Minot Air Force Base in Minot, N.D. Todd leaves behind lots of great memories of him. He was a star athlete in track and field and football. He was very outgoing, ambitious, and great with helping others deal with hard situations. He was preceded in death by his grandfather, Mr. Clarence Blue, Sr. He leaves to cherish his memory his mother, Patricia Blue; his father, John Briggs and stepmother, Faith Briggs; one sister, Alvina Blue; two brothers, Bryan Blue and Patrick Bryant; three wonderful grandmothers, Ms. Sarah C. Blue, Mrs. Mildred Patterson, and Mrs. Remonia Haskins; two grandfathers, Mr. Willie Patterson and Mr. Cecil Haskins; ten aunts; four uncles; one niece; two nephews; and many other friends and family. A memorial service will be held at 3 p.m. on Sunday, September 16, 2007 at Bethel A.M.E. Church, 635 E. Main Street, Wytheville, Va. with the Reverend Daryl E. Beamer, Sr. officiating. Interment will take place at Arlington National Cemetery in Washington D.C. Arrangements entrusted to Penn's Funeral Home, Pulaski. Published in the Roanoke Times on 9/14/2007. http://www.legacy.com/roanoke/obituaries.asp?Page=SearchResults http://www.rense.com/general78/death.htm WASHINGTON D.C. - Retired General To Investigate B-52 Nuclear Mistake Sep 21, 2007 08:08 AM PST Defense Secretary Robert Gates has asked a retired general who once commanded the nation's fleet of B-52s to lead an outside inquiry into how one of the bombers was mistakenly armed with nuclear weapons. Gates' press secretary, Geoff Morrell, says the defense chief has asked former Air Force Chief of Staff Larry Welch to lead the investigation. That's in addition to the Air Force's own investigation, which began three weeks ago. The B-52 in question was mistakenly armed with six nuclear-tipped cruise missiles when it flew from Minot Air Force Base, in North Dakota to Barksdale Air Force Base on August 30th. The missiles were mounted onto pylons under the bomber's wings, but the Air Force says there was never any danger to the public. Morrell says Welch will lead a Defense Science Board task force to determine whether the B-52 incident has wider implications for the military. (Copyright 2007 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.) Gates Seeks 2nd Inquiry of Bomber Mishap By ROBERT BURNS - 1 day ago WASHINGTON (AP) - Three weeks after the Air Force began investigating the mistaken arming of a B-52 bomber with nuclear weapons, Defense Secretary Robert Gates has asked for an outside inquiry led by a retired general who once commanded the strategic bomber fleet, an official said Thursday. In the embarrassing incident, a B-52 mistakenly armed with six nuclear-tipped cruise missiles flew from Minot Air Force Base, N.D., to Barksdale Air Force Base, La., on Aug. 30. The missiles were mounted onto pylons under the bomber's wings, but the Air Force said there was never any danger to the public. The mistake, revealed publicly by the Military Times newspapers, was so serious that President Bush and Gates were quickly informed and Gates has received regular updates from the Air Force on progress in its investigation. Gates's press secretary, Geoff Morrell, told reporters that the defense chief asked Larry Welch, a former Air Force chief of staff, to lead an inquiry into the implications of the incident. That is in addition to the existing Air Force probe headed by Maj. Gen. Douglas Raaberg, director of air and space operations at Air Combat Command, which is responsible for all Air Force bombers and fighters. Morrell said Welch will lead a Defense Science Board task force to determine whether the B-52 incident has wider implications for the military. "Does this incident reflect a larger problem with regard to the security and transfer of munitions?" is the question that Welch's group will attempt to answer, Morrell said. The Defense Science Board is a standing committee of outside experts, including retired military officers and former government officials, that advises the secretary of defense on a wide range of national security issues. Asked why Gates felt it necessary to launch another inquiry into the matter, Morrell said it did not reflect any dissatisfaction with the way the Air Force is conducting its investigation. "But I think he believes that in an incident of this nature, it's important to get to the bottom of it," Morrell said. "And he believes an outside set of eyes may be additionally helpful to, sort of, get a better sense of what went wrong and how to avoid similar mistakes in the future." An Air Force spokesman, Lt. Col. Edward Thomas, said his service's probe should be done within several weeks. "Our response has been swift and focused," Thomas said. The weapon involved in the Aug. 30 incident was the Advanced Cruise Missile, a "stealth" weapon developed in the 1980s with the ability to evade detection by Soviet radars. The Air Force said in March that it had decided to retire the Advanced Cruise Missile fleet in the near future. Welch is president and chief executive officer of the Institute for Defense Analysis, which administers three federally funded research centers that do analytical work for the Defense Department. Welch retired from the Air Force in 1990 after serving as its chief of staff. He previously was commander of Strategic Air Command, which operated the bomber fleet and was dissolved when an Air Force reorganization created Air Combat Command to operate all of its combat aircraft. On the Net: Defense Science Board at: http://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/ B-52 bomber at: http://www.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id83 MSNBC.com -Outside inquiry for nuke mishap Former Air Force official to head investigation into B-52 bomber incident The Associated Press Updated: 6:52 p.m. CT Sept 20, 2007 WASHINGTON - Three weeks after the Air Force began investigating the mistaken arming of a B-52 bomber with nuclear weapons, Defense Secretary Robert Gates has asked for an outside inquiry led by a retired general who once commanded the strategic bomber fleet, an official said Thursday. In the embarrassing incident, a B-52 mistakenly armed with six nuclear-tipped cruise missiles flew from Minot Air Force Base, N.D., to Barksdale Air Force Base, La., on Aug. 30. The missiles were mounted onto pylons under the bomber's wings, but the Air Force said there was never any danger to the public. The mistake, revealed publicly by the Military Times newspapers, was so serious that President Bush and Gates were quickly informed and Gates has received regular updates from the Air Force on progress in its investigation. Gates's press secretary, Geoff Morrell, told reporters that the defense chief asked Larry Welch, a former Air Force chief of staff, to undertake a review of the incident. That is in addition to the existing Air Force probe headed by Maj. Gen. Douglas Raaberg, director of air and space operations at Air Combat Command, which is responsible for all Air Force bombers and fighters. Asked why Gates felt it necessary to launch an independent review of the incident, Morrell said it did not reflect any dissatisfaction with the way the Air Force is conducting its investigation. "But I think he believes that in an incident of this nature, it's important to get to the bottom of it," Morrell said. "And he believes an outside set of eyes may be additionally helpful to, sort of, get a better sense of what went wrong and how to avoid similar mistakes in the future." An Air Force spokesman, Lt. Col. Edward Thomas, said his service's probe should be done within several weeks. "Our response has been swift and focused," Thomas said. The weapon involved in the Aug. 30 incident was the Advanced Cruise Missile, a "stealth" weapon developed in the 1980s with the ability to evade detection by Soviet radars. The Air Force said in March that it had decided to retire the Advanced Cruise Missile fleet in the near future. Ex-Air Force official's background Welch is president and chief executive officer of the Institute for Defense Analysis, which administers three federally funded research centers that do analytical work for the Defense Department. He also is a member of the Defense Science Board, which advises the secretary of defense on technical matters. A spokeswoman for Welch, Amy Cohen at the Institute for Defense Analysis, said Welch told her that his review of the B-52 incident was under the auspices of the Defense Science Board, but he did not elaborate on precisely what the board had been asked to do. Welch retired from the Air Force in 1990 after serving as its chief of staff. He previously was commander of Strategic Air Command, which operated the bomber fleet and was dissolved when an Air Force reorganization created Air Combat Command to operate all of its combat aircraft. (c) 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20894747/ Mystery surrounds deaths of Minot airmen Sat, 22 Sep 2007 23:10:30 Six members of the US Air Force who were involved in the Minot AFB incident, have died mysteriously, an anti-Bush activist group says. The incident happened when a B-52 bomber was "mistakenly" loaded with six nuclear warheads and flown for more than three hours across several states, prompting an Air Force investigation and the firing of one commander. The plane was carrying Advanced Cruise Missiles from Minot Air Force Base, N.D, to Barksdale Air Force Base on August 30. The Air Combat Command has ordered a command-wide stand down on September 14 to review procedures, officials said. The missiles, which are being decommissioned, were mounted onto pylons on the bomber's wings and it is unclear why the warheads had not been removed beforehand. In addition to the munitions squadron commander who was relieved of his duties, crews involved in the incident, including ground crew workers had been temporarily decertified for handling munitions. The activist group Citizens for Legitimate Government said the six members of the US Air Force who were directly involved as loaders or as pilots, were killed within 7 days in 'accidents'. The victims include Airman First Class Todd Blue, 20, who died while on leave in Virginia. A statement by the military confirmed his death but did not say how he died. In another accident, a married couple from Barksdale Air Force Base were killed in the 5100 block of Shreveport-Blanchard Highway. The two were riding a 2007 Harley-Davidson motorcycle, with the husband driving and the wife the passenger, police said. "They were traveling behind a northbound Pontiac Aztec driven by Erica Jerry, 35, of Shreveport," the county sheriff said. "Jerry initiated a left turn into a business parking lot at the same time the man driving the motorcycle attempted to pass her van on the left in a no passing zone. They collided." Adam Barrs, a 20-year-old airman from Minot Air Force Base was killed in a crash on the outskirts of the city. First Lt. Weston Kissel, 28, a Minot Air Force Base bomber pilot, was killed in a motorcycle crash in Tennessee, the military officials say. Police found the body of a missing Air Force captain John Frueh near Badger Peak in northeast Skamania County, Washington. The Activist group says the mysterious deaths of the air force members could indicate to a conspiracy to cover up the truth about the Minot Air Base incident. The saga of a 'Bent Spear' 6 nukes fly across U.S.; no one notices for 36 hours - how could it happen? Sept 22, 2007 Just after 9 a.m. on Aug. 29, a group of U.S. airmen entered a sod-covered bunker on North Dakota 's Minot Air Force Base with orders to collect a set of unarmed cruise missiles bound for a weapons graveyard. They quickly pulled out a dozen cylinders, all of which appeared identical from a cursory glance, and hauled them along Bomber Boulevard to a waiting B-52 bomber. The airmen attached the gray missiles to the plane's wings, six on each side. After eyeballing the missiles on the right side, a flight officer signed a manifest that listed a dozen unarmed AGM-129 missiles. The officer did not notice that the six on the left contained nuclear warheads, each with the destructive power of up to 10 Hiroshima bombs. That detail would escape notice for an astounding 36 hours, during which the missiles were flown across the country to a Louisiana air base that had no idea nuclear warheads were coming. It was the first known flight by a nuclear-armed bomber over U.S. airspace, without special high-level authorization, in nearly 40 years. The episode, serious enough to trigger a rare "Bent Spear" nuclear incident report that raced through the chain of command to Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates and President Bush , provoked new questions inside and outside the Pentagon about the adequacy of U.S. nuclear weapons safeguards while the military's attention and resources are devoted to wars in Iraq and Afghanistan . Three weeks after word of the incident leaked to the public, new details obtained by The Washington Post point to security failures at multiple levels in North Dakota and Louisiana, according to interviews with current and former U.S. officials briefed on the initial results of an Air Force investigation of the incident. The warheads were attached to the plane in Minot without special guard for more than 15 hours, and they remained on the plane in Louisiana for nearly nine hours more before being discovered. In total, the warheads slipped from the Air Force's nuclear safety net for more than a day without anyone's knowledge. "I have been in the nuclear business since 1966 and am not aware of any incident more disturbing," retired Air Force Gen. Eugene Habiger, who served as U.S. Strategic Command chief from 1996 to 1998, said in an interview. A simple error in a missile storage room led to missteps at every turn, as ground crews failed to notice the warheads, and as security teams and flight crew members failed to provide adequate oversight and check the cargo thoroughly. An elaborate nuclear safeguard system, nurtured during the Cold War and infused with rigorous accounting and command procedures, was utterly debased, the investigation's early results show. The incident came on the heels of multiple warnings - some of which went to the highest levels of the Bush administration , including the National Security Council - of security problems at Air Force installations where nuclear weapons are kept. The risks are not that warheads might be accidentally detonated, but that sloppy procedures could leave room for theft or damage to a warhead, disseminating its toxic nuclear materials. A former National Security Council staff member with detailed knowledge described the event as something that people in the White House "have been assured never could happen." What occurred on Aug. 29-30, the former official said, was "a breakdown at a number of levels involving flight crew, munitions, storage and tracking procedures - faults that never were to line up on a single day." Missteps in the bunker The air base where the incident took place is one of the most remote and, for much of the year, coldest military posts in the continental United States . Veterans of Minot typically describe their assignments by counting the winters passed in the flat, treeless region where January wind chills sometimes exceed 100 degrees below zero. In airman-speak, a three-year assignment becomes "three winters" at Minot. The daily routine for many of Minot's crews is a cycle of scheduled maintenance for the base's 35 aging B-52H Stratofortress bombers - mammoth, eight-engine workhorses, the newest of which left the assembly line more than 45 years ago. Workers also tend to 150 intercontinental ballistic missiles kept at the ready in silos scattered across neighboring cornfields, as well as hundreds of smaller nuclear bombs, warheads and vehicles stored in sod-covered bunkers called igloos. "We had a continuous workload in maintaining" warheads, said Scott Vest, a former Air Force captain who spent time in Minot's bunkers in the 1990s. "We had a stockpile of more than 400 . . . and some of them were always coming due" for service. Among the many weapons and airframes, the AGM-129 cruise missile was well known at the base as a nuclear warhead delivery system carried by B-52s. With its unique shape and design, it is easily distinguished from the older AGM-86, which can be fitted with either a nuclear or a conventional warhead. Last fall, after 17 years in the U.S. arsenal, the Air Force's more than 400 AGM-129s were ordered into retirement by then- Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld . Minot was told to begin shipping out the unarmed missiles in small groups to Barksdale Air Force Base near Shreveport , La., for storage. By Aug. 29, its crews had already sent more than 200 missiles to Barksdale and knew the drill by heart. The Air Force's account of what happened that day and the next was provided by multiple sources who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the government's investigation is continuing and classified. At 9:12 a.m. local time on Aug. 29, according to the account, ground crews in two trucks entered a gated compound at Minot known as the Weapons Storage Area and drove to an igloo where the cruise missiles were stored. The 21-foot missiles were already mounted on pylons, six apiece in clusters of three, for quick mounting to the wings of a B-52. The AGM-129 is designed to carry silver W-80-1 nuclear warheads, which have a variable yield of between 5 and 150 kilotons. (A kiloton is equal to the explosive force of 1,000 tons of TNT.) The warheads were meant to have been removed from the missiles before shipment. In their place, crews were supposed to insert metal dummies of the same size and weight, but a different color, so the missiles could still be properly attached under the bomber's wings. A munitions custodian officer is supposed to keep track of the nuclear warheads. In the case of cruise missiles, a stamp-size window on the missile's frame allows workers to peer inside to check whether the warheads within are silver. In many cases, a red ribbon or marker attached to the missile serves as an additional warning. Finally, before the missiles are moved, two-man teams are supposed to look at check sheets, bar codes and serial numbers denoting whether the missiles are armed. Why the warheads were not noticed in this case is not publicly known. But once the missiles were certified as unarmed, a requirement for unique security precautions when nuclear warheads are moved - such as the presence of specially armed security police, the approval of a senior base commander and a special tracking system - evaporated. The trucks hauled the missile pylons from the bunker into the bustle of normal air base traffic, onto Bomber Boulevard and M Street, before turning onto a tarmac apron where the missiles were loaded onto the B-52. The loading took eight hours because of unusual trouble attaching the pylon on the right side of the plane - the one with the dummy warheads. By 5:12 p.m., the B-52 was fully loaded. The plane then sat on the tarmac overnight without special guards, protected for 15 hours by only the base's exterior chain-link fence and roving security patrols. Air Force rules required members of the jet's flight crew to examine all of the missiles and warheads before the plane took off. But in this instance, just one person examined only the six unarmed missiles and inexplicably skipped the armed missiles on the left, according to officials familiar with the probe. "If they're not expecting a live warhead it may be a very casual thing - there's no need to set up the security system and play the whole nuclear game," said Vest, the former Minot airman. "As for the air crew, they're bus drivers at this point, as far as they know." The plane, which had flown to Minot for the mission and was not certified to carry nuclear weapons, departed the next morning for Louisiana. When the bomber landed at Barksdale at 11:23 a.m., the air crew signed out and left for lunch, according to the probe. It would be another nine hours - until 8:30 p.m. - before a Barksdale ground crew turned up at the parked aircraft to begin removing the missiles. At 8:45, 15 minutes into the task, a separate missile transport crew arrived in trucks. One of these airmen noticed something unusual about the missiles. Within an hour, a skeptical supervisor had examined them and ordered them secured. By then it was 10 p.m., more than 36 hours after the warheads left their secure bunker in Minot. Once the errant warheads were discovered, Air Force officers in Louisiana were alarmed enough to immediately notify the National Military Command Center, a highly secure area of the Pentagon that serves as the nerve center for U.S. nuclear war planning. Such "Bent Spear" events are ranked second in seriousness only to "Broken Arrow" incidents, which involve the loss, destruction or accidental detonation of a nuclear weapon. The Air Force decided at first to keep the mishap under wraps, in part because of policies that prohibit the confirmation of any details about the storage or movement of nuclear weapons. No public acknowledgement was made until service members leaked the story to the Military Times, which published a brief account Sept. 5. Officials familiar with the Bent Spear report say Air Force officials apparently did not anticipate that the episode would cause public concern. One passage in the report contains these four words: "No press interest anticipated." How could so much break down at once? The news, when it did leak, provoked a reaction within the defense and national security communities that bordered on disbelief: How could so many safeguards, drilled into generations of nuclear weapons officers and crews, break down at once? Military officers, nuclear weapons analysts and lawmakers have expressed concern that it was not just a fluke, but a symptom of deeper problems in the handling of nuclear weapons now that Cold War anxieties have abated. "It is more significant than people first realized, and the more you look at it, the stranger it is," said Joseph Cirincione, director for nuclear policy at the Center for American Progress think tank and the author of a history of nuclear weapons. "These weapons - the equivalent of 60 Hiroshimas - were out of authorized command and control for more than a day." The Air Force has sought to offer assurances that its security system is working. Within days, the service relieved one Minot officer of his command and disciplined several airmen, while assigning a major general to head an investigation that has already been extended for extra weeks. At the same time, Defense Department officials have announced that a Pentagon-appointed scientific advisory board will study the mishap as part of a larger review of procedures for handling nuclear weapons. "Clearly this incident was unacceptable on many levels," said an Air Force spokesman, Lt. Col. Edward Thomas. "Our response has been swift and focused - and it has really just begun. We will spend many months at the air staff and at our commands and bases ensuring that the root causes are addressed." While Air Force officials see the Minot event as serious, they also note that it was harmless, since the six nuclear warheads never left the military's control. Even if the bomber had crashed, or if someone had stolen the warheads, fail-safe devices would have prevented a nuclear detonation. But independent experts warn that whenever nuclear weapons are not properly safeguarded, their fissile materials are at risk of theft and diversion. Moreover, if the plane had crashed and the warheads' casings cracked, these highly toxic materials could have been widely dispersed. "When what were multiple layers of tight nuclear weapon control internal procedures break down, some bad guy may eventually come along and take advantage of them," said a former senior administration official who had responsibility for nuclear security. Some Air Force veterans say the base's officers made an egregious mistake in allowing nuclear-warhead-equipped missiles and unarmed missiles to be stored in the same bunker, a practice that a spokesman last week confirmed is routine. Charles Curtis, a former deputy energy secretary in the Clinton administration , said, "We always relied on segregation of nuclear weapons from conventional ones." Former nuclear weapons officials have noted that the weapons transfer at the heart of the incident coincides with deep cuts in deployed nuclear forces that will bring the total number of warheads to as few as 1,700 by the year 2012 - a reduction of more than 50 percent from 2001 levels. But the downsizing has created new accounting and logistical challenges, since U.S. policy is to keep thousands more warheads in storage, some as a strategic reserve and others awaiting dismantling. A secret 1998 history of the Air Combat Command warned of "diminished attention for even 'the minimum standards' of nuclear weapons' maintenance, support and security" once such arms became less vital, according to a declassified copy obtained by Hans Kristensen, director of the Federation of American Scientists' nuclear information project. The Air Force's inspector general in 2003 found that half of the "nuclear surety" inspections conducted that year resulted in failing grades - the worst performance since inspections of weapons-handling began. Minot's 5th Bomb Wing was among the units that failed, and the Louisiana-based 2nd Bomb Wing at Barksdale garnered an unsatisfactory rating in 2005. Both units passed subsequent nuclear inspections, and Minot was given high marks in a 2006 inspection. The 2003 report on the 5th Bomb Wing attributed its poor performance to the demands of supporting combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. Wartime stresses had "resulted in a lack of time to focus and practice nuclear operations," the report stated. Last year, the Air Force eliminated a separate nuclear-operations directorate known informally as the N Staff, which closely tracked the maintenance and security of nuclear weapons in the United States and other NATO countries. Currently, nuclear and space operations are combined in a single directorate. Air Force officials say the change was part of a service-wide reorganization and did not reflect diminished importance of nuclear operations. 'What the hell happened here?' "Where nuclear weapons have receded into the background is at the senior policy level, where there are other things people have to worry about," said Linton F. Brooks, who resigned in January as director of the National Nuclear Security Administration. Brooks, who oversaw billions of dollars in U.S. spending to help Russia secure its nuclear stockpile, said the mishandling of U.S. warheads indicates that "something went seriously wrong." A similar refrain has been voiced hundreds of times in blogs and chat rooms popular with former and current military members. On a Web site run by the Military Times, a former B-52 crew chief who did not give his name wrote: "What the hell happened here?" A former Air Force senior master sergeant wrote separately that "mistakes were made at the lowest level of supervision and this snowballed into the one of the biggest mistakes in USAF history. I am still scratching my head wondering how this could happened." (c) 2007 The Washington Post Company Subject: B-52 Nukes Were Headed for Iran: Airforce Refused -- SPECIAL REPORT -- Air Force refused to fly weapons to Middle East theater By Wayne Madsen Sept. 24, 2007 Author's website WMR has learned from U.S. and foreign intelligence sources that the B-52 transporting six stealth AGM-129 Advanced Cruise Missiles, each armed with a W-80-1 nuclear warhead, on August 30, were destined for the Middle East via Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana. However, elements of the Air Force, supported by U.S. intelligence agency personnel, successfully revealed the ultimate destination of the nuclear weapons and the mission was aborted due to internal opposition within the Air Force and U.S. Intelligence Community. Yesterday, the /Washington Post/ attempted to explain away the fact that America's nuclear command and control system broke down in an unprecedented manner by reporting that it was the result of "security failures at multiple levels." It is now apparent that the command and control breakdown, reported as a BENT SPEAR incident to the Secretary of Defense and White House, was not the result of a command and control chain-of-command "failures" but the result of a revolt and push back by various echelons within the Air Force and intelligence agencies against a planned U.S. attack on Iran using nuclear and conventional weapons. The /Washington Post/ story on BENT SPEAR may have actually been an effort in damage control by the Bush administration. WMR has been informed by a knowledgeable source that one of the six nuclear-armed cruise missiles was, and may still be, unaccounted for. In that case, the nuclear reporting incident would have gone far beyond BENT SPEAR to a National Command Authority alert known as EMPTY QUIVER, with the special classification of PINNACLE. Just as this report was being prepared, /Newsweek/ reported that Vice President Dick Cheney's recently-departed Middle East adviser, David Wurmser, told a small group of advisers some months ago that Cheney had considered asking Israel to launch a missile attack on the Iranian nuclear site at Natanz. Cheney reasoned that after an Iranian retaliatory strike, the United States would have ample reasons to launch its own massive attack on Iran. However, plans for Israel to attack Iran directly were altered to an Israeli attack on a supposed Syrian-Iranian-North Korean nuclear installation in northern Syria. WMR has learned that a U.S. attack on Iran using nuclear and conventional weapons was scheduled to coincide with Israel's September 6 air attack on a reputed Syrian nuclear facility in Dayr az-Zwar, near the village of Tal Abyad, in northern Syria, near the Turkish border. Israel's attack, code named OPERATION ORCHARD, was to provide a reason for the U.S. to strike Iran. The neo-conservative propaganda onslaught was to cite the cooperation of the George Bush's three remaining "Axis of Evil" states -- Syria, Iran, and North Korea -- to justify a sustained Israeli attack on Syria and a massive U.S. military attack on Iran. WMR has learned from military sources on both sides of the Atlantic that there was a definite connection between Israel's OPERATION ORCHARD and BENT SPEAR involving the B-52 that flew the six nuclear-armed cruise missiles from Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota to Barksdale. There is also a connection between these two events as the Pentagon's highly-classified PROJECT CHECKMATE, a compartmented U.S. Air Force program that has been working on an attack plan for Iran since June 2007, around the same time that Cheney was working on the joint Israeli-U.S. attack scenario on Iran. PROJECT CHECKMATE was leaked in an article by military analyst Eric Margolis in the Rupert Murdoch-owned newspaper, the /Times of London/, is a program that involves over two dozen Air Force officers and is headed by Brig. Gen. Lawrence Stutzriem and his chief civilian adviser, Dr. Lani Kass, a former Israeli military intelligence officer who, astoundingly, is now involved in planning a joint U.S.-Israeli massive military attack on Iran that involves a "decapitating" blow on Iran by hitting between three to four thousand targets in the country. Stutzriem and Kass report directly to the Air Force Chief of Staff, General Michael Moseley, who has also been charged with preparing a report on the B-52/nuclear weapons incident. Kass' area of speciality is cyber-warfare, which includes ensuring "information blockades," such as that imposed by the Israeli government on the Israeli media regarding the Syrian air attack on the alleged Syrian "nuclear installation." British intelligence sources have reported that the Israeli attack on Syria was a "true flag" attack originally designed to foreshadow a U.S. attack on Iran. After the U.S. Air Force push back against transporting the six cruise nuclear-armed AGM-129s to the Middle East, Israel went ahead with its attack on Syria in order to help ratchet up tensions between Washington on one side and Damascus, Tehran, and Pyongyang on the other. The other part of CHECKMATE's brief is to ensure that a media "perception management" is waged against Syria, Iran, and North Korea. This involves articles such as that which appeared with Joby Warrick's and Walter Pincus' bylines in yesterdays /Washington Post/. The article, titled "The Saga of a Bent Spear," quotes a number of seasoned Air Force nuclear weapons experts as saying that such an incident is unprecedented in the history of the Air Force. For example, Retired Air Force General Eugene Habiger, the former chief of the U.S. Strategic Command, said he has been in the "nuclear business" since 1966 and has never been aware of an incident "more disturbing." Command and control breakdowns involving U.S. nuclear weapons are unprecedented, except for that fact that the U.S. military is now waging an internal war against neo-cons who are embedded in the U.S. government and military chain of command who are intent on using nuclear weapons in a pre-emptive war with Iran. CHECKMATE and OPERATION ORCHARD would have provided the cover for a pre-emptive U.S. and Israeli attack on Iran had it not been for BENT SPEAR involving the B-52. In on the plan to launch a pre-emptive attack on Iran involving nuclear weapons were, according to our sources, Cheney, National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley; members of the CHECKMATE team at the Pentagon, who have close connections to Israeli intelligence and pro-Israeli think tanks in Washington, including the Hudson Institute; British Foreign Secretary David Miliband, a political adviser to Tony Blair prior to becoming a Member of Parliament; Israeli political leaders like Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Likud leader Binyamin Netanyahu; and French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner, who did his part last week to ratchet up tensions with Iran by suggesting that war with Iran was a probability. Kouchner retracted his statement after the U.S. plans for Iran were delayed. Although the Air Force tried to keep the B-52 nuclear incident from the media, anonymous Air Force personnel leaked the story to /Military Times/ on September 5, the day before the Israelis attacked the alleged nuclear installation in Syria and the day planned for the simultaneous U.S. attack on Iran. The leaking of classified information on U.S. nuclear weapons disposition or movement to the media, is, itself, unprecedented. Air Force regulations require the sending of classified BEELINE reports to higher Air Force authorities on the disclosure of classified Air Force information to the media. In another highly unusual move, Defense Secretary Robert Gates has asked an outside inquiry board to look into BENT SPEAR, even before the Air Force has completed its own investigation, a virtual vote of no confidence in the official investigation being conducted by Major General Douglas Raaberg, chief of air and space operations at the Air Combat Command. Gates asked former Air Force Chief of Staff, retired General Larry Welch, to lead a Defense Science Board task force that will also look into the BENT SPEAR incident. The official Air Force investigation has reportedly been delayed for unknown reasons. Welch is President and CEO of the Institute for Defense Analysis (IDA), a federally-funded research contractor that operates three research centers, including one for Office of Science and Technology Policy in the Executive Office of the President and another for the National Security Agency. One of the board members of IDA is Dr. Suzanne H. Woolsey of the Paladin Capital Group and wife of former CIA director and arch-neocon James Woolsey. WMR has learned that neither the upper echelons of the State Department nor the British Foreign Office were privy to OPERATION ORCHARD, although Hadley briefed President Bush on Israeli spy satellite intelligence that showed the Syrian installation was a joint nuclear facility built with North Korean and Iranian assistance. However, it is puzzling why Hadley would rely on Israeli imagery intelligence (IMINT) from its OFEK (Horizon) 7 satellite when considering that U.S. IMINT satellites have greater capabilities. The Air Force's "information warfare" campaign against media reports on CHECKMATE and OPERATION ORCHARD also affected international reporting of the recent International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) resolution asking Israel to place its nuclear weapons program under IAEA controls, similar to those that the United States wants imposed on Iran and North Korea. The resolution also called for a nuclear-free zone throughout the Middle East. The IAEA's resolution, titled "Application of IAEA Safeguards in the Middle East," was passed by the 144-member IAEA General Meeting on September 20 by a vote of 53 to 2, with 47 abstentions. The only two countries to vote against were Israel and the United States. However, the story carried from the IAEA meeting in Vienna by Reuters, the Associated Press, and Agence France Press, was that it was Arab and Islamic nations that voted for the resolution. This was yet more perception management carried out by CHECKMATE, the White House, and their allies in Europe and Israel with the connivance of the media. In fact, among the 53 nations that voted for the resolution were China, Russia, India, Ireland, and Japan. The 47 abstentions were described as votes "against" the resolution even though an abstention is neither a vote for nor against a measure. America's close allies, including Britain, France, Australia, Canada, and Georgia, all abstained. Suspiciously, the IAEA carried only a brief item on the resolution concerning Israel's nuclear program and a roll call vote was not available either at the IAEA's web site -- http://www.iaea.org -- or in the media. The perception management campaign by the neocon operational cells in the Bush administration, Israel and Europe was designed to keep a focus on Iran's nuclear program, not on Israel's. Any international examination of Israel's nuclear weapons program would likely bring up Israeli nuclear scientist Mordechai Vanunu, a covert from Judaism to Christianity, who was kidnapped in Rome by a Mossad "honey trap" named Cheryl Bentov (aka, Cindy) and a Mossad team in 1986 and held against his will in Israel ever since. Vanunu's knowledge of the Israeli nuclear weapons program would focus on the country's own role in nuclear proliferation, including its program to share nuclear weapons technology with apartheid South Africa and Taiwan in the late 1970s and 1980s. The role of Ronald Reagan's Director of the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency Ken Adelman in Israeli's nuclear proliferation during the time frame 1983-1987 would also come under scrutiny. Adelman, a member of the Reagan-Bush transition State Department team from November 1980 to January 1981, voiced his understanding for the nuclear weapons programs of Israel, South Africa, and Taiwan in a June 28, 1981 /New York Times/ article titled, "3 Nations Widening Nuclear Contacts." The journalist who wrote the article was Judith Miller. Adelman felt that the three countries wanted nuclear weapons because of their ostracism from the West, the third world, and the hostility from the Communist countries. Of course, today, the same argument can be used by Iran, North Korea, and other "Axis of Evil" nations so designated by the neocons in the Bush administration and other governments. There are also news reports that suggest an intelligence relationship between Israel and North Korea. On July 21, 2004, New Zealand's /Dominion Post/ reported that three Mossad agents were involved in espionage in New Zealand. Two of the Mossad agents, Uriel Kelman and Elisha Cara (aka Kra), were arrested and imprisoned by New Zealand police (an Israeli diplomat in Canberra, Amir Lati, was expelled by Australia and New Zealand intelligence identified a fourth Mossad agent involved in the New Zealand espionage operation in Singapore). The third Mossad agent in New Zealand, Zev William Barkan (aka Lev Bruckenstein), fled New Zealand -- for North Korea. New Zealand Foreign Minister Phil Goff revealed that Barkan, a former Israeli Navy diver, had previously worked at the Israeli embassy in Vienna, which is also the headquarters of the IAEA. He was cited by the /Sydney Morning Herald/ as trafficking in passports stolen from foreign tourists in Thailand, Myanmar, Laos, and Cambodia. New Zealand's One News reported that Barkan was in North Korea to help the nation build a wall to keep its citizens from leaving. The nuclear brinkmanship involving the United States and Israel and the breakdown in America's command and control systems have every major capital around the world wondering about the Bush administration's true intentions. NOTE: WMR understands the risks to informed individuals in reporting the events of August 29/30, to the present time, that concern the discord within the U.S. Air Force, U.S. intelligence agencies, and other military services. Any source with relevant information and who wishes to contact us anonymously may drop off sealed correspondence at or send mail via the Postal Service to: Wayne Madsen, c/o The Front Desk, National Press Club, 13th Floor, 529 14th St., NW, Washington, DC, 20045. story to be continued MILITARY AND WAR PAGES ON THIS SITE IRAN AND WAR PAGES ON THIS SITE DREAMS OF THE GREAT EARTHCHANGES - MAIN INDEX http://www.greatdreams.com/planes/B-52.htm

The Nuclear Assassination Of America Exposed - The Nuclear Bible: A False-Flag Nuclear Terror Conspiracy

Vegas Street Prophet — Sat, 20 Apr 2013 12:27:42 -0400

The Nuclear Assassination Of America Exposed Posted: March 4, 2012 in Breaking News , Nuclear Terror The Nuclear Bible: A False-Flag Nuclear Terror Conspiracy Truther.org March 3, 2012 The Nuclear Bible is possibly the most powerful book ever written, for it has the power to take down both the Obama and Bush administrations and the Zionist puppeteers behind them. Unlike Clinton or Bush before him, U.S. President Barack Obama has yet to suffe a major terror attack in almost four years of office. Due to the lack of a major false-flag operations such as the Oklahoma City Bombing or the 9/11 Terror Attacks to terrorize Americans into blindly supporting their Commander and Chief, Obama has had a first-term free of terrorism, but why? Due to the lack of terror, hatred for Obama, his endless wars, and his fascist polices such as the NDAA (which allows for the arrest and indefinite detention of American citizens) has been able to fester, build and gain unprecedented momentum. In reality, it is hard to imagine what could possibly make Obama even more revolted, hated and less popular. Well, imagine no longer. Unbeknownst to most Americans, a thermonuclear weapon was to be detonated on Live TV at Super Bowl XLV in Dallas, Texas on February 6, 2011. The story surrounding the failed nuclear terror plot is revolutionary in and of itself, and it is currently being censored from both mainstream and alternative news sites. Despite the media blockade, it is only a matter of time before members of the Bush and Obama administration are indicted for conspiracy to commit nuclear terrorism. The Nuclear Bible On February 1, 2011, Julian Assange of Wikileaks revealed to the world via leaked classified diplomatic documents that Al-Qaida was on the brink of using a nuclear bomb and that the West was on the verge of a "Nuclear 9/11'' . What the diplomatic documents failed to mention was actual target, date and location of the upcoming nuclear terror attack. Published 4 days prior on January 28, 2011, David Chase Taylor 's free ebook , entitled The Nuclear Bible , specifically named Super Bowl XLV on February 6, 2011, in Dallas, Texas, as the target, date and location of the impending nuclear terror attack. After publishing The Nuclear Bible , Taylor conducted multiple radio interviews and phoned numerous intelligence and law enforcement agencies throughout America to personally ensure that no acts of terror were conducted on the American people. Based on the sudden interest in Taylor by U.S. intelligence services, Taylor, anticipating retaliation and fearing for his life, applied for political asylum in Switzerland on March 8, 2011 . The Evidence As with any legal matter, a full, independent and open investigation must be conducted prior to filing any legal charges. However, after reviewing the evidence regarding Super Bowl XLV , it's hard to believe that it's all just sheer coincidence. Numerous news articles, press releases, mass casualty and terror drills, government exercises, legislation, terror warnings, travel warnings, anomalies, suspicious alibis, mass cancellations, coincidences and events surrounding the game clearly indicate that a nuclear terror plot was indeed subverted at Super Bowl XLV . There have been 44 prior Super Bowls before Super Bowl XLV and nothing remotely similar has ever occurred at any one of them. Every ingredient needed to conduct a large scale false-flag/state-sponsored nuclear terror attack was present either before, during or after Super Bowl XLV . As Emma Bull once said, "Coincidence is the word we use when we can't see the levers and pulleys." In this particular case however, we have a pretty good idea Evidence regarding Super Bowl XLV is organized chronologically into three sub-categories: Pre-Super Bowl XLV Evidence, Super Bowl XLV Evidence, and Post-Super Bowl XLV Evidence. I. Pre-Super Bowl XLV Evidence 1. The 6 Hijacked Nukes Roughly 3 years prior to Super Bowl XLV on August 29, 2007, an unprecedented event occurred which wasn't reported until September 23, 2007 . Under the Bush and Cheney administration, 6 thermo-nuclear 150 kilo-ton nuclear warheads disappeared. What role these 6 nuclear weapons would have played in the Super Bowl XLV nuclear terror plot on is unknown, but Barksdale Air Force Base , where the nukes were last seen is roughly 100 miles from Dallas, Texas. Although the Air Force has since stated that the nuclear weapons were recovered, the deaths of at least (10) U.S. Air Force servicemen surrounding the incident makes it impossible to confirm that the hijacked nuclear weapons are not in the hands of Zionist terrorists. 2. The 2009 Super Bowl Joint Threat Assessment The 2009 Super Bowl XLIII Joint Threat Assessment (JTA) is the only JTA ever issued for a Super Bowl other than the JTA issued for Super Bowl XLV (2011) . The 2009 JTA acts as a literal playbook for what eventually transpired in reality in and around Super Bowl XLV in Dallas, Texas. A. The exact same scenario depicted in the 2009 JTA of terrorists using stolen or counterfeit security credentials to access the game occurred in Dallas, Texas, when 3 NFL laptops and 1 thumb drive with encrypted security information were allegedly stolen in the weeks before the game. B. The exact same scenario depicted in the 2009 JTA of terrorists attacking the game in the form of suicide bombers was also revealed by Family Security Matters 11 days before the game. The suicide bombers were to be located throughout Cowboys Stadium in seating sections strategically located near stadium exits. After the nuclear terror plot was exposed, the seats were abandoned, roped off, guarded by armed security, and off limits to the Super Bowl XLV crowd. In all 1250 seats were abandoned . C. As detailed in the 2009 JTA and The Nuclear Bible , Cowboys Stadium was to be attacked with a vehicle-borne improvised explosive device (VBIED), namely a Pakistani drone (6 drones have been downed in Pakistan since 9/11). The VBIED attack would come only AFTER the suicide bombers inside the stadium had detonated their explosives, subsequently causing a mass panic with every TV station in the world to tuning in to see the nuclear detonation. D. The exact same scenario depicted in the 2009 JTA of domestic terrorists being setup to be scapegoated for a Super Bowl attack was also depicted in The Nuclear Bible . The domestic terrorists were to charged be working with Muslim extremists in the aftermath of the attack. Title: Super Bowl XLIII: Joint Threat Assessment Date: January 16, 2009 Source: DHS, FBI, NCC, NORTHCOM, FFC Abstract : The high-profile nature of the Super Bowl, however, could make it a desirable target for a violent organization or individual seeking to take advantage of the intense media coverage...The presence of many corporate executives, politicians, and VIPs in one location, however, may present a collection opportunity for foreign intelligence services Access to Super Bowl Security breaches facilitated by stolen or counterfeit credentials and insider operatives pose additional threats to stadium security...The large number of contractors, media personnel, stadium employees, and vendors who will attend the Super Bowl could help cover efforts by terrorists to gain access inside the stadium. Stolen or counterfeit law enforcement badges and credentials purchased online-often of high quality and hard to differentiate from legitimate credentials-can facilitate unauthorized entry. Means of Attack The placement of explosive devices in heavily trafficked areas is assessed as the most likely mode of terrorist attack... Terrorists intent on attacking a stadium most likely would use one or more improvised explosive devices (IEDs) or vehicle-borne improvised explosive devices (VBIEDs). Such an attack during a major event would inflict immediate casualties and destruction as well as create fear and panic among survivors....Any such attacks would attract the extensive media attention most terrorists seek. Suicide Bombers A February 2006 posting on a jihadist message board-subsequently reproduced on other websites-provided tactical information for a multiple suicide bomber attack against a sporting event to create a stampede and incite panic. The author of the posting recommended the bombers use handmade explosive belts hidden under their clothing. The posting outlined how a suicide bomber would detonate explosives inside the stadium, after which other operatives would detonate their bombs at the exit gates where they expected panicked spectators to flee. The author believed the combined explosions would create a stampede that would kill more people than the bombings themselves. Domestic Terrorists Domestic terrorists have attacked soft targets in the past, however, and probably view major sporting events in large stadiums...to gain media coverage for their cause or issue. The Super Bowl's stature as a major media event commanding world attention likely increases its attractiveness to domestic terrorists, whether acting alone or as part of a group. A homegrown violent extremist ...may try to attack a Super Bowl event venue (DHS, FBI, NCC, NORTHCOM, FFC, 2009) . 3. Response to a Nuclear Detonation Memo (2009) Roughly 2 years prior to Super Bowl XLV, a 97 page report entitled "Planning Guidance for Response to a Nuclear Detonation" was issued by the numerous agencies within the U.S. government. Aside from stating that there would be no Federal response to a nuclear disaster for 72 hours, the memo uses a 10 kiloton nuclear weapon as size of the nuclear yield. This was the first of three U.S. government memos preparing American military, police, and first responders for the upcoming nuclear terror attack at Super Bowl XLV. Title: Planning Guidance For Response To A Nuclear Detonation Date: January 16, 2009 Source: Nuclear Detonation Response Communications Working Group Abstract : One of the most catastrophic incidents that could befall the United States (US), causing enormous loss of life and property and severely damaging economic viability is a nuclear detonation in a US city. The purpose of this guidance is to provide emergency planners with nuclear detonation-specific response recommendations to maximize the preservation of life in the event of an urban nuclear detonation. This guidance addresses the unique effects and impacts of a nuclear detonation such as scale of destruction, shelter and evacuation strategies, unparalleled medical demands, management of nuclear casualties, and radiation dose management concepts. The guidance is aimed at response activities in an environment with a severely compromised infrastructure for the first few days (e.g., 24-72 hours) when it is likely that many Federal resources will still be en route to the incident (Nuclear Detonation Response Communications Working Group, 2009) . 4. Nuclear, Terror, & Mass Casualty Drills In the 20 months leading up to Super Bowl XLV in Dallas, Texas, unprecedented mass casualty, nuclear, disaster and terror drills occurred all over the state of Texas involving local, state, and federal agencies. These drills were executed in order to prepare authorities and first responders for the nuclear terror attack as well as psychologically prepare both the government officials and the public for a major terror event. Title: National Level Exercise 2009 Date: July 27-31, 2009 Source: FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) Abstract : "NLE 09 will be the first major exercise conducted by the United States government that will focus exclusively on terrorism prevention and protection...NLE 09 is a White House directed, Congressionally- mandated exercise that includes the participation of all appropriate federal department and agency senior officials, their deputies, staff and key operational elements. NLE 09 will focus on intelligence and information sharing among intelligence and law enforcement communities, and between international, federal, regional, state, tribal, local and private sector participants. The NLE 09 scenario will begin in the aftermath of a national terrorist event ..." (FEMA, 2009) . Title: Rapid Response Task Force To Conduct Drill In Beaumont Date: June 8, 2010 Source: Beaumont Enterprise Abstract : "Hundreds of people from several agencies throughout the state of Texas converged on Ford Park to perform a four- hour Rapid Response Task Force Operations Drill...A massive convoy of state and military vehicles, communications equipment and emergency management personnel arrived to prepare for the drill. The Rapid Response Task Force is the mobilization of many state agencies in the event of a disaster. The task force was created for the rapid deployment of State resources and manpower to an area immediately following a disaster" (The Examiner, 2010). See: (Beaumont Enterprise, 2010) . Title: DPS Participates In Live-Action Hurricane Drill Date: June 9, 2010 Source: NBC News Abstract : "The Texas Department of Public Safety and numerous other agencies in the DFW (Dallas-Fort Worth) area are participating in a live-action hurricane drill June 9 through June 11. This exercise is intended to test emergency mobilization, response and preparedness in the event of a real natural disaster" (NBC News, 2010) . Title: Half-Full School Bus, Car, And 18-Wheeler With 'Radioactive Material' Date: June 10, 2010 Source: KLTV News Abstract : "Smith County emergency management geared up for a full-scale disaster Wednesday in Lindale. The emergency drill involved a half-full school bus, a car and an 18-wheeler carrying radioactive material..."We set up a unified command," said Tyler Fire Department Captain Jeff Aiken. "We worked together on this drill...we've taken care of the problems as a collective team and that's what it's all about." To give an idea of the importance of a radioactive waste drill, officials say more than 1,100 shipments of radioactive waste have been shipped through East Texas since 1999..." (KLTV News,2010) . 5. The Era of Nuclear Terrorism Has Arrived On February 6, 2010, exactly 1 year to the day before Super Bowl XLV, British conservative politician Liam Fox , a member of British parliament for North Somerset and then current Secretary of State for Defence, stated that ""The era of nuclear terrorism has arrived". Fox made the comment in regards to Iran despite the fact that Iran has not offensively attacked another nation in over 400 years. Title:Tories Would Back War with Iran Date: February 6, 2010 Source: Telegraph Abstract : Liam Fox described the threat posed by Iran as the "single most important issue facing the West"...He said that under Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's regime, the "export of terrorism and instability" was part of the country's foreign policy and warned "the era of nuclear terrorism has arrived" (Telegraph, 2010) . 6. 2010 Nuclear Security Summit Roughly 10 months prior to Super Bowl XLV, U.S. President Barack Obama spoke at the Nuclear Security Summit in Washington D.C. where he stated that nuclear terrorism was 'The Single Biggest Threat' to the United States. Obama's speech essentially warned the world that nuclear terror was on the horizon and that his administration would have no compunction in using nuclear weapons against the American people. Title: Obama: Nuclear Terrorism Is 'The Single Biggest Threat' To U.S. Date: April 11, 2010 Source: USA Today Abstract : "The single biggest threat to U.S. security, both short-term, medium-term and long-term, would be the possibility of a terrorist organization obtaining a nuclear weapon...We know that organizations like al-Qaeda are in the process of trying to secure nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction, and would have no compunction at using them" (USA Today, 2011) . 7. The 2011 NFL, NBA, & MLB Lockout Just in time for the planned February 6, 2011 nuclear terror attack at Super Bowl XLV, the 3 major sports leagues of the America, the National Football League (NFL), the National Basketball Association (NBA), and Major League Baseball (MLB), all had simultaneous labor lockouts. Whether or not NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell, NBA Commissioner David Stern and MLB Commissioner Bud Selig, had foreknowledge regarding an impending nuclear attack is unknown, but their imposed lockouts make complete from a financial standpoint. Post nuclear attack, fans would likely steer clear of sporting events and stadiums, costing the leagues millions if not billions in lost revenue. The lost revenue would then be compounded by the hundreds of millions of dollars the owners would have to keep paying to their players. In all likelihood, the NBA, NFL, and MLB would have had to file for bankruptcy in the aftermath of a nuclear terror attack on a stadium, unless of course they had inside information and planned their collective bargaining agreements accordingly. Title: The NFL, NBA & MLB Lockouts of 2011 Date: January 28, 2011 Source: The Nuclear Bible A. NFL CBA: Collective Bargaining Agreement expired on March 4, 2011 (ESPN, 2011) . B. NBA CBA: "This Agreement shall be effective from July 29, 2005 and, unless extended or terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Article XXXIX, shall continue in full force and effect through June 30, 2011'' (NBA, 2011) . C. MLB CBA: "The current CBA expires on December 11, 2011: 2007-2011 BASIC AGREEMENT: This Agreement, effective December 20, 2006, is between the 30 Major League Clubs and the Major League Baseball Players Association" (MLB, 2011) . 8. The Canceled Nuclear Attack Test Roughly 8 months prior to Super Bowl XLV, the U.S. military canceled a nuclear attack exercise in Las Vegas, Nevada, when Sin City allegedly pulled out of the exercise citing business concerns. The nuclear attack exercise cancellation gave the U.S. government the well needed plausible deniability and legal cover post nuclear attack in that they attempted to execute military exercises to stop a nuclear terror scenario, but the gaming community refused to comply Title: Military Cancels Nuclear Attack Test Date: April 26, 2010 Source: Washington Times Abstract : The U.S. military has canceled a major field exercise that tests its response to a nuclear attack...The exercise was canceled recently after the planned site for a post-nuclear-attack response - Las Vegas - pulled out in November, fearing a negative impact on its struggling business environment. The NLE, which is supposed to be a series of hands-on exercises to test the system in the event terrorists use a nuclear device, has become instead a "tabletop exercise at best," the official said. The field exercise in Las Vegas was to simulate terrorists detonating an improvised nuclear device assembled with smuggled weapons-grade uranium (Washington Times, 2010) . 9. Response to a Nuclear Detonation Memo (2010) Roughly 8 months prior to Super Bowl XLV, a 135 page report entitled "Planning Guidance for Response to a Nuclear Detonation" was issued by the numerous agencies within the U.S. government. The second edition was in part to "provide planners the opportunity to think beyond the 10 KT nuclear yield, insinuating that the nuclear blast planned for Super XLV would far exceed a dirty bomb. This was the second of three U.S. government memos preparing American military, police, and first responders for the upcoming nuclear terror attack at Super Bowl XLV. Title: Planning Guidance For Response To A Nuclear Detonation Date: June 2010 Source: Nuclear Detonation Response Communications Working Group Abstract : One of the most catastrophic incidents that could befall the United States (US), causing enormous loss of life and property and severely damaging economic viability is a nuclear detonation in a US city. The purpose of this guidance is to provide emergency planners with nuclear detonation-specific response recommendations to maximize the preservation of life in the event of an urban nuclear detonation. This guidance addresses the unique effects and impacts of a nuclear detonation such as scale of destruction, shelter and evacuation strategies, unparalleled medical demands, management of nuclear casualties, and radiation dose management concepts. The guidance is aimed at response activities in an environment with a severely compromised infrastructure for the first few days (e.g., 24-72 hours) when it is likely that many Federal resources will still be en route to the incident (Nuclear Detonation Response Communications Working Group, 2010) . 10. International Nuclear Smuggling Conference Roughly 7 months prior to Super Bowl XLV, individuals from atomic energy, law enforcement and policy experts from almost 30 countries met in Sofia, Bulgaria from June 17-19, 2011, under the auspices of the Nuclear Smuggling International Technical Working Group (ITWG). In all likelihood, this was a meeting to review strategy prior to the nuclear detonation in Dallas, Texas on February 6, 2011. Title: Nuclear Forensics Experts Plan Path Forward Date: February 1, 2011 Source: Telegraph Abstract : Atomic energy, law enforcement and policy experts from nearly 30 countries met in Sofia, Bulgaria June 17-19 under the auspices of the Nuclear Smuggling International Technical Working Group (ITWG) to share experience on nuclear forensics and illicit trafficking issues. The ITWG will conduct an analytic exercise this fall involving nuclear material, agreed on elements of a 3-year plan for further forensic exercises, and is preparing a guideline for crime scene analysis involving nuclear or radiological materials (Telegraph, 2011) . 11. Foreign Troops in Texas On August 6, 2010, exactly 6 months prior to Super Bowl XLV, a mass-casualty drill entitled Operation Lone Star concluded about 400 miles south of Dallas, Texas. Interestingly, the drill included both Czech and Chilean troops whose flags are almost identical to that of Texas. In the aftermath of a nuclear terror attack, pandemonium, chaos and fear would likely make it impossible for the public tell the difference between the flags. Title: Texas Guard, Czech Army Trains For Disaster In Operation Lonestar Date: August 6, 2010 Source: National Guard Abstract : "What we do and what we're training for is a mass casualty," said Texas State Guard Capt. James R. Owens..."This year, these state assets used the annual humanitarian event Operation Lone Star to conduct a complete exercise simulating a mass casualty incident. "At one level, we provide free care," said Dr. Brian R. Smith..."At the same time, it provides a preparedness exercise for those of us in public health and the Texas Military forces to work together and to practice together in a major event". Spanning six counties in Texas, Operation Lone Star functions as an ideal execution of a real-time public health crisis, uniting disparate agencies for a common and worthy goal...Further bridging the spirit of cooperation, even service members from the Czech Republic and Chilean armies supported OLS this year." (National Guard, 2011) . 12. The Nuclear Detonation Preparedness Memo Roughly 5 months prior to Super Bowl XLV, a 46 page report entitled "Nuclear Detonation Preparedness Communicating In The Immediate Aftermath" was issued by the numerous agencies within the U.S. government. This was the third of three U.S. government memos preparing American military, police, and first responders for the upcoming nuclear terror attack at Super Bowl XLV. Title:Nuclear Detonation Preparedness Communicating In The Immediate Aftermath Date: September 2010 Source: Nuclear Detonation Response Communications Working Group Abstract : A nuclear detonation in the United States is one of the most devastatingly catastrophic incidents imaginable. While the United States Government is working with its international partners to ensure this nightmare scenario never becomes reality, failing to plan for managing the consequences would be irresponsible. This document was developed as a resource for emergency responders and federal, state, and local officials communicating with the public and media during the immediate aftermath following a nuclear detonation in the United States. While we hope there is never a need for these messages, we have a responsibility to the American people to be prepared to respond and communicate effectively in the event of any type of national emergency, including a nuclear detonation (Nuclear Detonation Response Communications Working Group, 2010) . 13. Cheney Predicts Nuclear Terror Roughly 4 months prior to Super Bowl XLV, former U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney, a man responsible in part for the 9/11 attacks , emphatically stated that the next terror attack upon the Unites States would either be nuclear or biological. Had a nuclear weapon been detonated in Dallas, Texas, the death toll Cheney predicted would have likely been dwarfed as millions would have perished in the thermo-nuclear terror attack. Title: Cheney Says Next Terror Attack Will Be Biological Or Nuclear Date: September 30, 2011 Source: Bio Prep Watch Abstract : According to former vice president Dick Cheney, the next terrorist attack on the Western world could be nuclear or biological and the death toll could total in the hundreds of thousands. Cheney spoke with the Toronto Sun on Monday to discuss his life in politics, which he recounted in the recently released memoir..."My biggest concern today when I think about a threat is the possibility that there'll be another major attack but next time they will have deadlier weapons, not just airline tickets and box cutters," Cheney said, according to the Toronto Sun. "I worry very much about the possibility of a group of terrorists getting their hands on a biological agent of some kind or a nuclear device and setting one of those off in the middle of one of our cities. That would be devastating, obviously. The death toll would run into the hundreds of thousands" (Bio Prep Watch, 2011) . 14. The Nuclear Terrorism Detection Plan Roughly 6 weeks prior to Super Bowl XLV, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano submitted a nuclear detection plan to the U.S. Congress essentially stating that the Obama administration had done all that it could do to prevent a nuclear terror attack upon the United States. Title: Homeland Security Delivers Nuclear Detection Plan To Capitol Hill Date: January 5, 2011 Source: Nuclear Threat Initiative Abstract : "The Domestic Nuclear Detection Office delivered its long-awaited "strategic plan" for the global nuclear detection architecture to Capitol Hill on Dec. 20, according to DNDO chief Warren Stern. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano signed off on the plan that same day...In addition, the interdepartmental road map outlines the roles of a number of federal branches in preventing terrorists from detonating a nuclear or radiological device inside the United States...Participating entities include the Defense, Energy, Justice and State departments, the U.S. national intelligence director and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission...The detection office was established by presidential directive in 2005 to coordinate federal efforts to protect the United States against nuclear terrorism. It was also designated to be the lead agency in domestic nuclear detection" (NTI, 2011) . 15. The Joint Special Event Threat Assessment Roughly 3 weeks prior to Super Bowl XLV, a Joint Threat Assessment (JTA) was issued by numerous U.S. governmental agencies in an attempt to gain plausible deniability in the aftermath of the nuclear terror attack. This was only the second time that a Super Bowl warranted a JTA, the other being Super Bowl XLIII in 2009 . A. The exact same scenario depicted in the 2009 and the 2011 JTA of terrorists using stolen or counterfeit security credentials to access the game occurred in and around Super Bowl XLV in Dallas, Texas. B. The exact same scenario depicted in the 2009 and the 2011 JTA of terrorists attacking the game in the form of suicide bombers was revealed by Family Security Matters 11 days before the game. The suicide bombers were to be located throughout Cowboys Stadium in seating sections strategically located near stadium exits. After the nuclear terror plot was exposed, the seats were abandoned, roped off, guarded by armed security, and off limits to the Super Bowl XLV crowd. In all 1250 seats were abandoned . C. As detailed in the 2009 JTA, the 2011 JTA and The Nuclear Bible , Cowboys Stadium was to be attacked with a vehicle-borne improvised explosive device (VBIED), namely a Pakistani drone (6 drones have been downed in Pakistan since 9/11). The VBIED attack would come only AFTER the suicide bombers inside the stadium had detonated their explosives, subsequently causing a mass panic with every TV station in the world to tuning in to see the nuclear detonation. D. The exact same scenario depicted in the 2009 and 2011 JTA of domestic terrorists being setup to be scapegoated for a Super Bowl attack was also depicted in The Nuclear Bible . The domestic terrorists were to be charged be working with Muslim extremists in the aftermath of the attack. Title: Super Bowl XLV: Joint Special Event Threat Assessment Date: January 11, 2011 Source: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, FBI , the Dallas Police Department, the Arlington Police Department, the United States Northern Command, the National Counterterrorism Center and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency Abstract : We have no information indicating a specific foreign intelligence threat related to Super Bowl XLV; however, the presence of many corporate executives, politicians, and VIPs in one location presents collection opportunities for foreign intelligence services. Access to Super Bowl Terrorists or criminals might try to gain access to restricted areas by impersonating government or military officials or emergency personnel. Detecting and detaining such individuals would pose a key security challenge prior to and during the Super Bowl. Means of Attack We assess placement of one or more improvised explosive devices (IEDs) or vehicle-borne improvised explosive devices (VBIEDs) in or near the stadium would be the preferred method of attack by terrorists. Such an attack during the game would inflict immediate casualties and destruction and create fear and panic among spectators. Terrorists also could use IEDs or VBIEDs against crowded, unsecured targets nearby, such as local businesses and public parking lots, as diversions or to stage secondary attacks against first responders. Domestic Terrorists Lone offenders pose a threat to any large event like the Super Bowl. They are often difficult to detect because they have no visible links to known terrorist groups or networks, and they conduct their typically limited planning and preoperational activities in isolation. Suicide Bombers Suicide bombing is a widely used terrorist tactic overseas against eventsa nd locations where large numbers of people are present. Such attacks could also target crowded, unsecured targets nearby. (FBI & DHS, 2011) . 16. U.S. Nuclear Detectors Not Properly Tested Roughly 3 weeks prior to Super Bowl XLV, the National Academy of Science released a report stating that nuclear detection devices in the U.S. had failed to work properly and that data gained from these detectors were unreliable. This report essentially gave the Obama administration plausible deniability and relieved them of any legal responsibility in the aftermath of the nuclear terror attack. Title: Report: Port Devices Not Duly Tested Date: January 14, 2011 Source: Washington Post Abstract : "Homeland security officials responsible for defending against radiological and nuclear terror attacks did not properly test high-tech radiation detectors for use at the nation's ports of entry...The Domestic Nuclear Detection Office, or DNDO, at the Department of Homeland Security conducted poorly designed performance tests that undermined officials' ability to draw reliable conclusions...DNDO officials also presented the test results "in ways that are incorrect and potentially misleading" (Washington Post, 2011) . 17. The NFL Laptop & Information Thefts In the weeks leading up to Super Bowl XLV, the exact same scenario depicted in the both the Super Bowl XLIII: Joint Threat Assessment (2009) and the Super Bowl XLV: Joint Threat Assessment (2011), of stolen, fraudulent or counterfeit security credentials being used to access the game began to transpire in reality. In total, 3 NFL laptops, several thumb drives, and an iPod with security credentials and encrypted software were allegedly stolen in the Dallas, Texas, area just prior to Super Bowl XLV. Title: Laptop With Artwork For Super Bowl Credentials Is Stolen Date: January 15, 2011 Source: Star-Telegram Abstract : A laptop computer containing NFL and Super Bowl XLV artwork that was to be used on credentials was stolen (Star-Telegram, 2011) . Title: NFL Laptops With Encryption Software Stolen Date: January 30, 2011 Source: Alertsec Express Abstract : Two more National Football League (NFL) employee's laptops have been stolen at the Dallas Convention Center on Sunday. The stolen laptops belonged to a private investigator and a security consultant based in California...These laptops not only stored sensitive information but also not protected with encryption software...A similar incident happened earlier this month...According to Arlington police, several thumb drives and security credential artwork were also stolen with the laptop (Alertsec Xpress, 2011) . 18. The Global Ambassadors Summit in Washington D.C. Only 6 days prior to Super Bowl XLV, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called an historic first of its kind ambassadors meeting in Washington D.C., which lasted from January 31, 2011, until February 4, 2011. The meeting was so important to matters of state that ambassadors from almost all 260 U.S. embassies, consulates and other posts in more than 180 countries were present. This meeting was likely used by the Obama administration to prep U.S. ambassadors on the policies and procedures they needed to adhere to in the aftermath of the first nuclear terror attack upon the United States. Title: Hillary Clinton Calls Historic Meeting Of Ambassadors Date: January 31, 2011 Source: Politico Abstract : "Ambassadors from almost all 260 U.S. embassies, consulates and other posts in more than 180 countries are expected to convene at the State Department for what's being billed as the first meeting of its kind...One of the officials questioned why every ambassador in the world was required to come back to the States for a group of lectures when this could have been done virtually" (Politico, 2011). 19. 9/11 Deja Vu: Global Terror Workshop in Abu Dhabi Roughly 10 weeks prior to 9/11, a first of its kind summit took place in Abu Dhabi also involving the U.S. Department of State. The secret terror meetings were likely used by the Bush administration to prep various governmental and security organizations on the policies and procedures they needed to adhere to in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks. Title: Anti-Terrorism Meet In Abu Dhabi Date: July 1, 2001 Source: The Gulf News Abstract : "More than 200 people from various strategic organisations are taking part in an eight-day anti-terrorist workshop in the capital. The workshop, which got underway yesterday, is designed to train people in how to recognise and deal with a terrorist attack using nuclear, chemical or biological weapons. It is the first time training of this kind...The workshop has been organised by the General Directorate of Abu Dhabi Police in co-operation with the United States Department of State, Anti-terrorism Assistance Programme (The Gulf News, 2001) . 20. Sleeper Cells, Suicide Bombers & Nuclear Bombs Just 11 days prior to Super Bowl XLV, Family Security Matters, a front for the Zionist Center for Security Policy , broke the story that there were terrorist sleeper cells located within the United States and that there is a "high probability" that suicide bombers will strike in "relatively short time". Coincidentally, the information depicted in the article in respect to suicide bombers reflects the information contained within the both the Super Bowl XLIII: Joint Threat Assessment (2009) and the Super Bowl XLV: Joint Threat Assessment" (2011). Title:Sleeper Cells In The USA Date: January 26, 2011 Source: Family Security Matters Abstract : There is every reason to suspect that will endure suicide missions by Islamist sleeper cells. They are already in place. They are waiting for the right time...An attack and the potential for a suicide bomber using a dirty radiological bomb from these facilities was and is a high probability... Terrorist sleeper cells are located primarily in Virginia, New York, North Carolina, Michigan, Florida, California, and Canada...The "sleepers" are prepared to conduct terrorist attacks within the U.S., and nuclear material is available to them. "Prepared" in this instance indicates they have the necessary tools to carry out their attacks and are prepared to die...Non profit organizations such as CAIR, ISNA, MANA, MSA, and several other Islamic based groups are in actuality simply fronts for Al Qaeda and Hamas. The leadership within these groups receives funds and training from the Saudi government. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) allows these groups to operate freely throughout the U.S. and at American's taxpayer's expense. Essentially the IRS grants the groups immunity and the authority to train, organize, and prepare for attacks against our country... U.S. citizens need to understand there are people trained and prepared to carry our suicide missions in the U.S. and nothing are off limits. Churches, malls, and even the schools our children attend are not off limits to suicide bombers. It is only a relatively short time before the U.S. will begin seeing suicide terrorist missions...Nuclear reactors are located on a large number of major university campuses in the U.S. There locations are not classified and are described on the internet (Family Security Matter, 2011) . 21. The Worldwide Terror Alerts In the week prior to Super Bowl XLV, the U.S. Department of State, the UK, and Russia issued multiple terror warnings in regards to 1) attacks on U.S. citizens, 2) bombings, 3) attacks at high-profile sporting events, 4) nuclear weapons, and 5) Pakistan. The terror warnings were issued to 1) give the Obama administration plausible deniability in the aftermath of the nuclear terror attack, 2) to train the American public to treat all post-nuclear attack terror warnings with the utmost caution, and 3) to develop and international narrative the nuclear terror threat was real. Title: Worldwide Caution Date: January 31, 2011 Source: U.S. Department of State Abstract : "The Department of State remains concerned about the continued threat of terrorist attacks, demonstrations, and other violent actions against U.S...Demonstrations and rioting can occur with little or no warning. Current information suggests that Al-Qaida and affiliated organizations continue to plan terrorist attacks against U.S. interests...These attacks may employ a wide variety of tactics including suicide operations, assassinations, kidnappings, hijackings, and bombings. Extremists may elect to use conventional or non-conventional weapons, and target both official and private interests. Examples of such targets include high-profile sporting events" (U.S. State Department, 2011). Title: US Issues Global Terror Alert Including India And Pakistan Date: February 2, 2011 Source: National Terror Alert (DHS) Abstract : "Threat of terrorist attacks, demonstrations and other violent actions against US citizens" (DHS, 2011 ). Title: UK And US Warn About The Nuclear Threat Date: February 1, 2011 Source: Voice of Russia Abstract : "The growing threat of uncontrollable development of nuclear weapons in Iran and Pakistan...The most recent American intelligence reports concluded that Pakistan had seriously expanded its nuclear arsenal since the beginning of Barack Obama's presidency" (The Voice of Russia, 2011) . 22. The Al Qaeda Nuclear Bomb On February 1, 2011, just 5 days prior to Super Bowl XLV, WikiLeaks broke a story that media around the world began parroting; Al Qaeda now had a nuclear bomb and they intend to inflict a "Nuclear 9/11'' on the West. Interestingly, the entire narrative of Al Qaeda and their nuclear bomb has all but disappeared from the media post Super Bowl XLV. Title: WikiLeaks: 'Al-Qaida On Brink Of Using Nuclear Bomb' Date: February 1, 2011 Source: Fox News Abstract : "Al-Qaida is on the verge of producing radioactive weapons after sourcing nuclear material and recruiting rogue scientists to build "dirty" bombs...A leading atomic regulator has privately warned that the world stands on the brink of a "nuclear 9/11''. Security briefings suggest that jihadi groups are also close to producing "workable and efficient" biological and chemical weapons that could kill thousands if unleashed in attacks on the West (Fox News, 2011) . Title: WikiLeaks: Al-Qaeda 'Is Planning A Dirty Bomb' Date: February 2, 2012 Source: Telegraph Abstract: A leading atomic regulator has privately warned that the world stands on the brink of a "nuclear 9/11''. Security briefings suggest that jihadi groups are also close to producing "workable and efficient" biological and chemical weapons that could kill thousands if unleashed in attacks on the West. Tomihiro Taniguchi, the deputy director-general of the IAEA, has privately warned America that the world faces the threat of a "nuclear 9/11'' if stores of uranium and plutonium were not secured against terrorists (Telegraph, 2011) . Title: World 'On Brink Of Nuclear 9/11' As Al Qaeda Plans Large 'Dirty' Bomb Date: February 2, 2011 Source: Daily Mail Abstract : New diplomatic documents released by WikiLeaks show that U.S. intelligence personnel have been informed of terrorist attempts to acquire dangerous amounts of uranium and plutonium. The cables warn of a large trafficking operation of chemical weapons material and threats of a 'nuclear 9/11' unless the West intervenes swiftly. Tomihiro Taniguchi, the IAEA's deputy director-general, reportedly told U.S. officials the world stands on the brink of a 'nuclear 9/11' unless agency stores of nuclear material were sufficiently protected from terrorists (Daily Mail, 2011) . 23. Al Qaeda, Nuclear Weapons & Sporting Events Just 4 days prior to Super Bowl XLV, John Choon Yoo, a former attorney in the U.S. Department of Justice during the George W. Bush administration who was known for the Torture Memos and advocating the torture of children , wrote the following op-ed in regards to Al Qaeda, nuclear weapons and sporting events. Title:Threat Of Al Qaeda Nuclear Bomb Underscores Importance Of Success In Afghanistan Date: February 2, 2011 Source: Ricochet Abstract : Al-Qaida is on the verge of producing radioactive weapons after sourcing nuclear material and recruiting rogue scientists to build "dirty" bombs, according to leaked diplomatic documents. A leading atomic regulator has privately warned that the world stands on the brink of a "nuclear 9/11''. This report should come as no shock. Information that came into the U.S. government's after 9/11 revealed that al Qaeda had vigorously pursued WMD technology. If al Qaeda really wanted to spread terror in the United States, they would use these primitive WMDs on soft, undefended targets like shopping malls, sporting events , and the crowded downtowns of major cities (Ricochet, 2011) . 24. The Bi-Polar Super Bowl Terror Warnings On February 3, 2011, just 3 days prior to Super Bowl XLV, U.S. intelligence officials emphatically stated that there was no terror threat to Super Bowl XLV . The next day, February 4, 2011, the same U.S. intelligence officials reneged on their previous statement by warning that terrorists may be disguised inside Super Bowl XLV . These bi-polar warnings were issued in an attempt to confuse American citizens as to the true nature of the threat, deflect criticism in the aftermath in the aftermath of the attack, and provide plausible deniability for intelligence agencies. Title: Officials: No Specific Terror Threat To Super Bowl Date: February 3, 2011 Source: ABC News Abstract : U.S. intelligence officials say there is no specific terrorist threat to Sunday's Super Bowl, but they say al-Qaida and other similar groups remain interested in carrying out attacks during such high profile events (ABC News, 2011) . Title: Feds Warn Of Disguised Terrorists At Super Bowl Date: February 4, 2011 Source: CBS News Abstract : Intelligence officials warn that terrorists might also try to get inside events by impersonating government or military officials or emergency personnel...Detecting and detaining such individuals would pose a key security challenge prior to and during the Super Bowl (CBS News, 2011) . 25. How to Survive a Nuclear Disaster Just 3 days prior to Super Bowl XLV, the American news show Inside Edition ran a story entitled "How To Survive A Nuclear Disaster". Despite being on the air since October 9, 1988, Inside Edition had never run a story on nuclear terrorism, but issued a nuclear terror warning 72 hours before Super Bowl XLV. Title:How To Survive A Nuclear Disaster Date: February 3, 2011 Source: Inside Edition Abstract : It's the scenario we dread, terrorists detonate a nuclear bomb in a U.S city. Hollywood depicts how they envision this disaster. But if it really did happen, would you know what to do? It's estimated that if a nuclear device were detonated in Los Angeles, the fallout would cause 280,000 deaths and injuries among people who didn't take shelter. The government recently issued new guidelines on responding to a nuclear attack. The reports stress that sheltering is the best first response even though "sheltering goes against natural instincts to run from danger" (Inside Edition, 2011) . 26. U.S. Department of Homeland Security & NFL Partnership Only 2 days prior to Super Bowl XLV, U.S. Department of Homeland (DHS) Security Secretary Janet Napolitano stated that, "We are simply asking the American people to be vigilant, recognizing that our security is a shared responsibility that all of us must participate in...If a fan at the Super Bowl or any other American at any other place sees something that is potentially dangerous, then say something about it to local law enforcement or someone in authority." This was a calculated moved by DHS to put the responsibility of keeping the Super Bowl terror free onto the American public while giving herself and DHS plausible deniability in the aftermath. Title: Homeland Security Secretary Inspects Super Bowl Site, Says Fans Have 'Shared Responsibility' For Security At Game And Across the Country Date: February 4, 2011 Source: CNS News Abstract : Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano traveled to Dallas earlier this week to personally inspect the massive security operation surrounding the 45th Super Bowl game and to announce the "If You See Something, Say Something" campaign. "We are partnering this year with the NFL on our 'If You See Something, Say Something' campaign and launching that NFL partnership right here at the Super Bowl," Napolitano said during a press conference on Monday at Cowboy Stadium in Arlington, Texas where Sunday's game will be played. "The idea is simple," Napolitano said. "We are simply asking the American people to be vigilant, recognizing that our security is a shared responsibility that all of us must participate in." "If a fan at the Super Bowl or any other American at any other place sees something that is potentially dangerous, then say something about it to local law enforcement or someone in authority," Napolitano said. Napolitano announced that DHS has trained some 1,200 stadium staffers as "first observers" and that cargo going into the venue also will be screened using "non-intrusive inspection equipment" (CNS News, 2011) . II. Super Bowl XLV Evidence 27. Barack Obama's Super Bowl Party During Super Bowl XLV, U.S. President Barack Obama held a Super Bowl party/meeting in Washington D.C. where most of his cabinet and top officials were in attendance. The Washington D.C. Super Bowl party/meeting scenario also occurred during the 2009 and 2010 Super Bowl , despite it never occurring with any other presidential administration. It was an ingenious way for Obama to summons his entire cabinet and agency heads on a Sunday for an immediate response in the aftermath of a nuclear terror attack. The Obama administration would appear unified, composed, and resolute as Obama addressed the nation from the White House while being flaked by a majority of his cabinet and top Congressional members. Unlike the 2009 and 2010 Obama Super Bowl parties, all governmental personal needed in the aftermath of a nuclear attack were present at Obama's Super Bowl XLV party (Shaun Donovan, U.S. Secretary for Housing and Urban Development, Arne Duncan, U.S. Secretary of Education, Eric Holder, U.S. Attorney General, Lisa Jackson, Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Janet Napolitano, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Susan Rice, Ambassador to the United Nations, Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Eric Shinseki, U.S. Secretary of Veterans Affairs and Tom Vilsack, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture). Title: Obama's White House Super Bowl Party: See The Full Guest List Date: April 7, 2010 Source: Huffington Post Abstract : Barack Obama will be holding a White House Super Bowl party, just like last year , when one attendee said the party got " pretty rowdy ." The White House released the guest list for this year's party. Among the attendees are a handful of House members, one senator and almost ten cabinet members. Title: Obama's Super Bowl Party: Jennifer Lopez, Marc Anthony On Guest List Date: February 2, 2011 Source: Huffington Post Abstract : "The guest list for President Barack Obama's White House Super Bowl party includes entertainers Jennifer Lopez and Marc Anthony...A White House spokesman said about 100 people have been invited, including White House staff, family and friends such as Attorney General Eric Holder, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and Sens. Pat Toomey and Robert Casey Jr. of Pennsylvania and congressman Reid Ribble of Wisconsin. (Huffington Post, 2011) . 28. The 485/1250 Empty Seats at Super Bowl XLV For the first time in modern history, there were empty seats at an NFL Super Bowl. Completed on May 27, 2009 , Cowboys Stadium was built to hold a maximum capacity crowd of 110,000, including standing room, but was somehow only able to seat 103,219 on its biggest day of February 6, 2011. Despite being the hottest ticket in town, 485 fans (recently upped to 1250) were allegedly barred from entering the game based on the NFL's excuse that their seats were not completed . A more likely explanation is that the "disguised terrorists" that the U.S. intelligence services warned may be inside Super Bowl XLV were likely slated to sit in the "uncompleted" seats. The 1250 seats were likely unavailable at game time due to a weapons cache that included suicide bomber belts which were stashed in and around the "uncompleted" seats. The 2009 Super Bowl JTA and a Family Security Matters article released roughly 10 days before Super Bowl XLV stated that suicide bomber would attack at sporting events. Coincidentally, the empty seats were strategically placed near exits just as stated in the Super Bowl XLIII: Joint Threat Assessment (2009). Suicide bomber were also mentioned in the Super Bowl XLV: Joint Threat Assessment (2011). Once the nuclear terror plot was exposed, it left those running the nuclear terror operation with a quandary. Since the explosives and weapons had already been planted in the Cowboys stadium, it was impossible to remove it prior to the game, hence the empty seats. The seats in question were then covered with a large black cloth and guarded the entire game by armed security guards . The "uncompleted" seats occurred in at least 4 locations throughout the Cowboy Stadium and on multiple levels. Allegedly, the NFL knew a week before that there may be an issue with the seats but failed to notify ticket holders. As evidenced by the follow-up seating snafu at the BCS NCAA College Football Championship , there is a concerted effort to make "seating issues" the norm and to muddy the waters regarding what really occurred at Super Bowl XLV. Title: Some Super Bowl Seats Not Completed Date: February 7, 2011 Source: ESPN Abstract : "Incomplete installation of temporary seats in a limited number of sections made the seats unusable...Stadium workers were covering the top corner sections of the upper deck behind one end zone two hours prior to kickoff. There were off-limits seats in the same upper-deck rows as seats that were deemed safe. Yellow police tape was used as a dividing line, with uniformed personnel also keeping folks away" (ESPN, 2011) . Title: Blame The Media: Press Gets Fans' Seats At BCS Championship Date: January 10, 2012 Source: ESPN Abstract : There was another ticket mix-up at a championship football game. Dozens of fans arrived at the Superdome for the Allstate BCS Championship Game between No. 1 LSU and No. 2 Alabama to find their seats were taken for auxiliary press seating Monday night. The top two rows of the upper deck were turned into an overflow area for the media, with one of the rows covered by tables. The mix-up is similar to a situation that occurred at last year's Super Bowl in Arlington, Texas, where some temporary seating had not been inspected and couldn't be used. Incidentally, the Super Bowl will be in the Superdome next season and auxiliary media seating will be needed for that game as well (ESPN, 2012) . Title: NFL Aims To Avoid Super Bowl Seating Snafu Date: January 27, 2012 Source: USA Today Abstract : The troublesome temporary seats that left the NFL with a black eye at last year's Super Bowl in North Texas should be a non-issue when the game is played at Lucas Oil Stadium on Feb. 5. That's because there will be only 254 of them. Frank Supovitz, the league's senior vice president for events, says the decision was made in March to dramatically scale back initial plans that included several thousand temporary seats. Last year's Super Bowl at Cowboys Stadium was infamous for a seating snafu that displaced 1,250 ticketholders because railings, seats and risers had not been installed (USA Today, 2012) . 29. Texas Governor Rick Perry's Super Bowl Alibi Despite Texas never hosting a Super Bowl until 2011, Texas governor Rick Perry was at Ronald Reagan's would-be 100th birthday party in California. This was a premeditated move to give Perry an alibi and safe-house outside of Texas, while also giving him a heart wrenching story to parrot while running in the 2012 U.S. Presidential campaign. Coincidentally, other Texas politicians also decided to pass on Super Bowl XLV. Title: Some Texas Politicians Are No-Shows At Super Bowl Date: February 6, 2011 Source: Star-Telegram Abstract : Some Texas politicians made news for NOT showing up at today's Super Bowl. Texas Gov. Rick Perry is in California, celebrating what would have been former President Ronald Reagan's 100th birthday. Apparently Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst and House Speaker Joe Straus had other plans as well. Many state and congressional lawmakers planned to watch the game at home or with family or friends (Star-Telegram, 2011) . 30. George W. Bush & Super Bowl XLV The situation regarding former U.S. President George W. Bush and Super Bowl XLV is highly suspicious. Bush, an NFL fan who previously attended big games in Texas, couldn't seem to make up his mind in regards to the biggest football game Texas had ever seen. Despite Texas never hosting a Super Bowl until 2011, Bush had other plans. A. On January 31, 2011, it is reported that George W. Bush and his wife Laura will attend Super Bowl XLV B. On February 6, 2011, it is reported that George W. Bush has cancelled his previously scheduled trip to Switzerland where he had planned to speak at a Jewish charity fundraiser. Alleged protests against Bush's war crimes were used as an excuse by Bush to cancel his trip to Switzerland. C. On February 6, 2011, attends Super Bowl XLV in Dallas, Texas. Evidentially, once the nuclear terror attack had been called off, Bush felt safe enough to attend Super Bowl XLV. During the game, Bush was repeatedly seen reading a book via an iPad like mechanism instead of watching the game. It is highly possibly that Bush was reading The Nuclear Bible ; after all, it made him change his plans at least twice in one day. Title: Bushes Will Attend Super Bowl, Clinton Not Date: January 31, 2011 Source: UPI Abstract : "It's been exciting being back in Dallas the week before the Super Bowl," Barbara Bush said. "Neither Jenna nor I can stay for the game. I've got to get back to work." While George and Laura Bush plan to attend the game, former President Bill Clinton won't be able to make it. Dallas Cowboys owner and President Jerry Jones invited Clinton to the game, but the former president reportedly asked for a rain check (UPI, 2011) . Title: George W. Bush Cancels Trip To Switzerland Amid Calls For Protests & War Crimes Investigation Date: February 6, 2011 Source: UPI Abstract : Former President George W. Bush was forced to cancel a trip to Switzerland amid concerns of massive protests and calls from human rights groups to investigate his administration for war crimes...The ex-prez learned on Friday his invite to speak at an event in Geneva hosted by the United Israel Appeal, a Jewish charity, had been nixed" (New York Daily News, 2011) . Title: Stars Come Out To Watch The Super Bowl Date: February 7, 2011 Source: The Telegraph Abstract : Celebrities streamed into Cowboys Stadium to watch the Green Bay Packers beat the Pittsburgh Steelers 31 to 25. Hugh Jackman, John Travolta, Adam Sandler, Jennifer Aniston, Catherine Zeta-Jones and Michael Douglas were among the film stars cheering on their teams from the sidelines. Owen Wilson and Jamie Foxx - who both grew up in North Texas - also watched the game. As Lea Michele of "Glee" sang "America the Beautiful," the gigantic screen in the middle of the stadium flashed to former President George W. Bush and former first lady Laura Bush, who made their home in Dallas after he left office (Telegraph, 2011) . 31. 9/11 Deja Vu: Clinton & Gore Leave U.S. Coincidentally, just before the 9/11 Terror Attacks, former U.S. President Bill Clinton was convenientyl left for Australia while former U.S. Vice President Al Gore left for Austria. Title: Clinton's Fight Against Terrorism Date: February 11, 2009 Source: CBS News Abstract : The 42nd president of the United States was in Australia when the Sept. 11 attack occurred. "I remember it vividly," recalls Mr. Clinton, who says his first thought was that "Osama bin Laden did this" (CBS, 2009) . Title: On 911...An Ill Wind Blew Clinton To Australia Date: January 25, 2006 Source: Rense Abstract : Al Gore also was 'out of town' on 9/11. IN AUSTRIA OF ALL PLACES for the Conference for Internet and Technology Austria (Rense, 2006) . 32. Super Bowl XLV Cancellations On Super Bowl XLV and the days leading up to it, at least a dozen cancellations occurred in respect to a number of both public and private events without a lot of public explanation. In many cases, the celebrities and professional athletes actually left town prior to the big game, despite traveling to Dallas, Texas, specifically to watch Super Bowl XLV. Based on the viral nature of The Nuclear Bible , it is highly plausible that information regarding an impending terror attack reached people on the ground in Dallas, Texas, who then decided to skip town. A. Canceled: Super Bowl Concert (Dallas Voice, 2011) B. Canceled: Warren Sapp Superlegends Super Bowl Bash (Z Events, 2011) C. Canceled: The Big Ante Super Bowl Party Charity Event with Patrick Crayton (Super Sunday HQ, 2011) D. Canceled: Michael Vick Super Bowl Party (Huffington Post, 2011) E. Canceled: Everson Griffin Super Bowl Party (ESPN, 2011) F. Canceled: Arlington Community Super Bowl Watch Party (Star-Telegram, 2011) G. Canceled: Prince Concert (Billboard, 2011) H. Canceled: Erykah Badu Concert (Dallas Observer, 2011) I. Canceled: Snoop Dogg Appearance (Fox, 2011) J. Canceled: Michael Sorrentino aka "The Situation" Appearance (Fox, 2011) K. Canceled: Adrian Peterson All-In Celebrity Poker Tournament (AdrianPeterson.com) L. Canceled: Former U.S. President George W. Bush's Trip to Switzerland (NY Daily News, 2011) III. Post Super Bowl XLV Evidence 33. U.S. Invasion of Libya Exactly 1 week after Super Bowl XLV, the U.S. and NATO attacked Libya for no apparent reason. This sudden and unprovoked attack was likely done in an attempt to divert immediate attention from what transpired in Dallas, Texas, and to set up Libya as a future Al Qaeda state to menace the West for years to come. As evidenced by the video below, an Al Qaeda flag is now flying in Benghazi, Libya. Title: 2011 Libyan Civil War Date: February 15, 2011 Source: Wikipedia Abstract : The 2011 Libyan civil war, also known as the Libyan Revolution , is an ongoing armed conflict in the North African state of Libya being fought between forces loyal to Muammar Gaddafi and his regime and those seeking to depose him. The situation began on 15 February 2011 as a series of peaceful protests which were met with military force by the Gaddafi regime (Wikipedia, 2011) . 34. NFL Security Chief Resigns after Super Bowl XLV Roughly 9 weeks after Super Bowl XLV, the head of NFL Security, Milt Ahlerich, suddenly retired. Ahlerich's abrupt retirement clearly indicates that the NFL was party to the Super Bowl XLV nuclear terror plot and subsequently "cleaned house" in the aftermath. Title: NFL Names A New Security Chief Date: April 12, 2011 Source: NBC Sports Abstract : NFL V.P. of security Milt Ahlerich retired last week after 16 years on the job...NFL spokesman Greg Aiello has announced via Twitter that Ahlerich will be succeeded by Jeff Miller . Miller, the former Commissioner of the Pennsylvania State Police, joined the NFL in 2008. Among other things, he implemented the in-stadium fan code of conduct (NBC Sports, 2011) . 35. Osama bin Laden Assassinated Roughly 12 weeks after Super Bowl XLV, the U.S. government killed Osama bin Laden on May 1, 2011 , despite multiple news sources confirming that bin Laden actually died on December 26, 2001 . It is highly probable that the staged death of bin Laden was executed due to the Super Bowl XLV nuclear terror being exposed and the U.S. government felt it necessary to change up their nuclear terror strategy. Coincidentally, Osama bin Laden was killed in Pakistan, the Super Bowl nuclear terror scapegoat. Subsequently, Pakistan will forever be linked to bin Laden as the country where the world's most notorious terrorist was allegedly hiding. Title: Osama Bin Laden Killed In US Raid On Pakistan Hideout Date: May 2, 2011 Source: Guardian Abstract : Osama bin Laden, mastermind of the 11 September 2001 attacks and the world's most wanted man, has been killed in a US operation in north-western Pakistan, Barack Obama has announced. US special forces launched a helicopter-borne assault on a closely guarded compound in Abbottabad, 30 miles north-east of Islamabad, on Sunday night, Obama and US officials said (The Guardian, 2011) . 36. Top Nuclear Scientist "Commits Suicide" Almost 2 month after Super Bowl XLV, nuclear scientist Rodger Lynn Dickey (see article below) died a horrible death which was immediately called a suicide. Dickey's death is suspicious for a number of reasons: A. The death of Dickey came roughly six weeks after Super Bowl XLV. B. The death of Dickey occurred in New Mexico, a neighboring state to Texas where the failed nuclear terror plot took place. C. According to New Mexico undersheriff Ed Romero who investigated Dickey's death, " been working in New Mexico for a while". Romero's statement contradict Dickey's own resume which shows that he had been working in New Mexico for only 5 months. D. Dickey died while falling 650 feet off the Gorge Bridge which raises concerns about foul play and the possibility of assassination. E. Has Dickey committed suicide as alleged, it is unlikely that his rental car would be found parked in the middle of the bridge in the westbound lane. Suicides tend to be more of a thought out process rather than a spur of the moment thing. More than likely, Dickey was flowed, forced to pull over, take out at gunpoint and thrown over the bridge. F. Despite the fact that a suicide/murder investigation can takes weeks, months or even years, the New Mexico authorities state within 24 hours that Dickey committed suicide by jumping off the 650 foot bridge. The authorities also reported that Dickey wrote a suicide note, but that "it does not specifically give his intentions." G. According to Dickey's resume , Dickey worked as a Senior Nuclear Engineer from October 2010 until his death in March of 2011 for both ENREGS, Inc. and EnergX LLC . According to both his resume and the article which reported his death, Dickey worked in Albuquerque, New Mexico for ENREGS, and therefore could not have also worked for EnergX LLC who only has offices in Tennessee, Washington and Colorado. H. Coincidentally, EnergX LLC is a privately held corporation that according to their website has "experienced personnel to support the design, build, and licensing of new commercial nuclear power facilities" and deals specifically in radioactive waste management. Due to the failed Super Bowl nuclear terror plot, there was likely the need for a nuclear scientist to remove the thermonuclear weapon from its location in Cowboys Stadium. I. For roughly 11 years (December of 1999 until October of 2010), Dickey's employment record as a nuclear scientist is mysteriously missing . Who was Dickey working for during this period? Was Dickey part of a secret U.S. government nuclear terror program? While one can only speculate as to where Dickey was employed during his absence, he did work for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission from 1977 until 1978. J. Had Dickey, an expert in nuclear safety programmatic assessment, regulatory compliance, hazard assessment, safety analysis, safety basis documentation, nuclear engineering design and application, nuclear waste management, project management, and risk management actually been involved in the failed Super Bowl XLV nuclear terror plot, it makes sense that he would be liquidated as witnesses in the aftermath. While there is no direct evidence linking Dickey to the Super Bowl nuclear terror plot, it stands to reason that there was a secret government program in the works to plot, plan, implement and execute the numerous locational, logistical, electrical, chronological, environmental and security related factors involved in a nuclear terror plot of that magnitude. In all likelihood, Dickey was the lead nuclear scientist running the program. His mysterious 11 year absence from the field of nuclear science along with his abnormal death all indicate that Dickey was ultimately disposed of along with his 5 Russian colleagues (see below) in the aftermath of the failed Super Bowl nuclear terror plot. Title: Body In Rio Grande Gorge Identified As Scientist Date: March 23, 2011 Source: Taos News Abstract : Taos County Sheriff's Office stated Tuesday (March 22) that they have identified the body found in the R'io Grande Gorge last Friday (March 18) as belonging to a nuclear scientist from Washington state. Undersheriff Ed Romero said that Rodger Lynn Dickey, 56, died after he jumped from the Gorge Bridge. Dickey, a scientist working on contract with Sand'ia Laboratory, was originally from Richland, Wash. "He'd been working in New Mexico for a while," Romero said. "He did leave a note, but it does not specifically give his intentions." Romero said that a vendor setting up at the bridge for the day called the police when Dickey's rental car was found parked in the middle of the bridge in the westbound lane (Taos News, 2011) . 37. The 5 Dead Russian Nuclear Scientists Roughly 5 months after Super Bowl XLV, five Russian nuclear scientists (see article below) died in a mysterious and suspicious plane crash. Their timely deaths are suspicious for a number of reasons: A. The cluster of dead Russian nuclear scientists came roughly five months after Super Bowl XLV. B. The deaths of the Russian nuclear scientists came roughly three months after American nuclear scientist Rodger Lynn Dickey was found dead. Nuclear scientists are rare and don't die very often, especially 5 at a time and 6 in three months. C. The suspicious plane crash in which the Russian nuclear scientists died raises questions and concerns about foul play and the possibility of assassination. D. The post-mortem allegations that the Russian nuclear scientists were helping Iran with their alleged nuclear program at behest of the Russian government never made the mainstream news, despite it being breaking news. E. By insinuating that the Russian nuclear scientists were helping Iran with their nuclear ambitions, it invites the possibility that they may have been assassination victims of the Israeli Mossad, a convenient and obvious way to dismiss the deaths, especially when purposely written into the original story line. F. Had Israel assassinated the Russian nuclear scientists in Russian territory, it would have been a blatant act of war. If the assassinations itself didn't start a war, it would have at least sparked an international fire-storm over Mossad's assassination program. G. Despite the fact that a plane crash investigation generally takes months or even years to complete, the Russian government stated within 72 hours that there was "no official suspicion of foul play" and that human error and technical malfunction was to blame. H. The Russian nuclear scientists that died just happened to be involved in the set-up and development of nuclear plants. The education and training of the nuclear scientists would likely be the type needed in the set-up and development of a nuclear weapon at an off-site location, such as the Super Bowl. I. Had the Russian nuclear scientists actually been involved in the failed Super Bowl XLV nuclear terror plot, it makes sense that they would be liquidated as witnesses in the aftermath. While there is no direct evidence linking the 5 deceased Russian nuclear scientists to the Super Bowl XLV nuclear terror plot, it stands to reason that there was a secret government program in the works to plot, plan, implement and execute the numerous locational, logistical, electrical, chronological, environmental and security related factors involved in a nuclear terror plot of that magnitude, especially one involving a stadium, a football game, and live TV. Coincidentally, an electrician working at the new Dallas Cowboys stadium also died while wiring the stadium for electricity. Title: Scientists Who Helped Iran With Nuke Plant Died in Russian Plane Crash Date: June 23, 2011 Source: Fox News Abstract : Five scientists killed in Monday's Russian plane crash assisted in the development of Iran's nuclear plant...Scientists Andrei Tropinov, Sergei Rizhov, Gennadi Benyok, Nicolai Tronov and Valery Lyalin worked at the Bushehr nuclear power plant and helped to complete construction of it. The five scientists were employed at the Hydropress factory, a member of Russia's state nuclear corporation, according to Haaretz.com. Russian officials say there was no foul play in the plane crash that killed 45 people despite other similar accidents and plane crashes involving Iranian nuclear scientists. "Although Iranian nuclear scientists have in the past been involved in unexplained accidents and plane crashes, there is no official suspicion of foul play," a Russian source told the Associated Press. Russian investigators say that human error and technical malfunction caused the deadly crash (Fox News, 2011) . 38. Ron Paul's 3rd Party Run Although Ron Paul has emphatically stated that he will never run 3rd party in the 2012 U.S. Presidential election, it will happen. The only way Obama will ever win a second term in the White House is if Paul runs 3rd party and takes away the crucial independent votes that Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney needs to win the presidency. Unfortunately, Paul's future flip-flop is a bold and calculated move to guarantee Obama another four years in office in which America will no doubt see the face of nuclear terrorism. 39. Super Bowl L (2016) in Dallas Texas Should U.S. President Barack Obama win the 2012 U.S. Presidential election, he will be in the White House for Super Bowl L in 2016. Coincidentally, it has just been reported that Dallas, Texas will likely host the Super Bowl in 2016. Therefore, the 50th Super Bowl will return to Dallas, Texas, the crime scene where the first planned nuclear terror attack was thwarted. If David Chase Taylor author of The Nuclear Bible is not granted asylum in Switzerland, he will likely be forced out of Switzerland and picked up by U.S. or NATO intelligence services. Once arrested, Taylor will not be able to serve as a nuclear terror witness and will likely be disappeared, tortured and killed. 40. An Indictment of Nuclear Terror Due to the magnitude of nuclear terror and the implications that it brings, any suspects in the Super Bowl XLV nuclear terror plot will likely resort to plausible deniability. This refers to the denial of blame in loose and informal chains of command where upper rungs quarantine the blame to the lower rungs, and the lower rungs are often inaccessible, meaning confirming responsibility for the action is nearly impossible. In the case that the Super Bowl XLV nuclear terror plot becomes public, high-ranking officials in the Obama administration may deny any awareness of such act or any connection to the agents used to carry out such acts. Despite the anticipated denials, indictments must be filed. When it comes to legal question of indictment, there is none better than famed former Los Angeles County District Attorney Vincent Bugliosi , author of " The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder ". Aside from his successful prosecution of Charles Manson in 1970, Bugliosi has successfully prosecuted 105 out of 106 felony jury trials, including 21 murder convictions without a single loss, in his stellar career at the L.A. County District Attorney's Office. According to Bugliosi, there are five basic types of legal questions that must be posed prior to indicting a person or administration with a murder, or in this case, conspiracy to commit nuclear terror: A. Did the defendant(s), or did they not, conspire to commit nuclear terror? B. If so, was there, or was there not, a legal justification, such as self-defense, for the act of nuclear terror? C. Was the intent to kill via nuclear terror premeditated? D. At the time of the act, did the defendant(s) have malice aforethought (intent to kill)? E. Could conspiracy to commit murder be proved beyond a reasonable doubt? It is now up to the American public to forward the information surrounding The Nuclear Bible to District Attorneys throughout America. Once the facts of the case are reviewed, it is likely only a matter of time before politicians, sheriffs, and law enforcement officials subpoena, depose, and indict the following suspects: A. U.S. President Barack Obama B. U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton C. U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano D. NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell E. VP of NFL Security Milt Ahlerich F. NFL Spokesman Greg Aiello, Cowboys G. Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones H. Former U.S. President George W. Bush I. Texas Governor Rick Perry J. All 260 U.S. Ambassadors While the aforementioned names are by no means a complete list of the nuclear terror suspects, it is a great start in what will eventually become the trial of the century. Conclusion The marriage of terror and the Super Bowl was first made in a 1977 film entitled Black Sunday , wherein Arab terrorists hijacked a blimp, loaded it with explosives and tried to attack the Super Bowl. Fourteen years later, Tom Clancy's book entitled The Sum of All Fears depicted a nuclear bomb being detonated inside an NFL stadium. More than likely, the plan to terrorize the Super Bowl and its live TV audience with nuclear terror has been plotted and planned for at least 30 years. The Nuclear Bible exposes this master plan in full and has exposed ALL aspects of the nuclear terror conspiracy. The evidence presented within this article is only a fraction of the information contained within The Nuclear Bible . The free ebook is over 1,000 pages in length and contains over 1,000 sources which ultimately connect the dots of the nuclear terror conspiracy. The combined research of David Chase Taylor took over 1 year to compile, organize, and document, and it is foolish to believe that nuclear terror threat will disappear based on one major setback. More than likely, the nuclear terror plan will be repackaged, rebranded, eventually resurface at the World Cup or another live sporting event. Exposing the Super Bowl XLV nuclear terror conspiracy will do for the World what 9/11 Truth has done for America, namely, open millions of minds to state sponsored terrorism and the decrepit state of government. Therefore, please forward the information contained within The Nuclear Bible to mainstream and alternative news outlets worldwide while we still have the free internet. http://truthernews.wordpress.com/2012/03/04/the-nuclear-assassination-of-america-exposed/

In Syria, the Rebels Have Begun to Fight Among Themselves

Yowzer — Wed, 27 Mar 2013 01:04:02 -0400

The day started like a regular Sunday for Mohammad al-Daher, better known as Abu Azzam, the commander of the rebel Farouq Brigades in the vast swath of eastern Syria called the Jazira, a region that stretches from the Turkish border to the Iraqi frontier and encompasses the three provinces of Raqqa, Hasaka and Deir ez-Zor. He had a series of meetings in the morning in a number of locations in the bustling town of Tal Abyad on Syria's border with Turkey as well as in the partially destroyed former police station that is the Farouq's headquarters. And he was going to visit his mother. By late afternoon, however, the burly 34-year-old Raqqa native would be lying in a hospital bed - wounded by members of the ultraconservative Islamist group Jabhat al-Nusra (which the U.S considers a terrorist organization with links to al-Qaeda). Abu Azzam's targeting has blown open a sharp rift and long-brewing conflict between the more secular nationwide Farouq brigades and the Jabhat. The two groups are among the most effective, best organized and most well-known of the many military outfits aligned against Syrian President Bashar Assad - and the fight between them is just beginning. ( MORE: Syria's Many Militias: Inside the Chaos of the Anti-Assad Rebellion ) Farouq has the upper hand in Tal Abyad, which lies opposite the Turkish city of Akcakale. It snatched the border crossing from Assad's forces on Sept. 19, much to the chagrin of a number of other rebel groups - both secular units under the loose banner of the Free Syrian Army (FSA), as well as Islamist groups operating independently. It's not the only border post controlled by the Farouq. The gateway to Idlib province, Bab al-Hawa, near the Turkish city of Reyhanli, is also in their hands. The Jabhat, on the other hand, were at the forefront of taking Raqqa city, farther to the south, the first provincial capital to fall to any rebel force. By mid-afternoon, Abu Azzam stopped in to see his mother, Em Mohammad, in her modest first-floor apartment a short walk from the Farouq base. The young man stooped to kiss her right hand, he put his forehead to it before kissing her cheeks and embracing her warmly. "Finally, I see you!" she told him, gently scolding her son as he sat beside her. "You know the last time I saw him he was like this," Em Mohammad said, picking up Abu Azzam's two cell phones, holding one to each ear and pretending to issue orders into them, interspersing the talk of weapons and requests for battle updates with "Hi, mother, how are you, how is your health?" The half a dozen men in the room all laughed. "I'm sorry," Abu Azzam told his mother, "but what can I do?" Turkish coffee was served in delicate, thin-handled china cups. On this day Abu Azzam wasn't in his unit's military uniform. He was dressed in indigo jeans, a dark green crew-neck sweater, a black leather jacket and navy boat shoes. He has a Salafi-style black beard (without a mustache) that he frequently tugs at and a smile so broad and disarming that it seems like it takes up his whole face. ( PHOTOS: Syria's Slow-Motion Civil War ) He reached for his pack of Winston Silver cigarettes before turning to his mother, a feisty, friendly woman in a long black dress and powder blue headscarf whom he bore a striking resemblance to. "Just so you don't hear it elsewhere, they planted an device in my car yesterday," he told her. Em Mohammad put her hand up to her mouth. She had lost Abu Hussein, the second of her three sons, on Feb. 20 in the battles for Raqqa province. He was also a member of the Farouq, a father of two little girls, and now her eldest son was telling her he had been targeted. "May God protect you," she told him. "Nobody dies before his time," Abu Azzam said, repeating a common Arabic phrase. In a chilling premonition of what would happen just a few hours later, he said: "I know that I am going to be killed either by the regime or by the Jabhat. There is no difference, they are both dirty." The device consisted of several sticks of TNT wired to the ignition of a BMW vehicle Abu Azzam often travels in. A neighbor alerted the Farouq leader to the presence of the device. Seated on the floor, Abu Azzam rattled off a laundry list of towns and cities he said the Farouq helped clear of Assad's forces. "What did they liberate?" he said of the Jabhat. "They are just here to try and impose their rules on us." He held up his cigarette: "They threatened to label me a kafir because of this," he said. (Some ultraconservatives consider smoking a sin.) ( MORE: Viewpoint: A Chemical-Weapon Mystery, a Reminder of How Blind We Are in Syria ) Some of the men in the room who had just returned from Raqqa city, relayed details of the Jabhat's smear campaign there against Abu Azzam and the Farouq. "They're calling us Farouq sarouk," one said ( sarouk roughly translated in this context means thief). "Some of them say that we are nonbelievers." It's not the first time Abu Azzam has clashed with conservative Islamists. Before taking Tal Abyad, he was in charge of the Bab al-Hawa crossing hundreds of kilometers away. A Syrian Islamist extremist called Abu Mohamad al-Absi, who led a group of foreign jihadis who at one point controlled one of Bab al-Hawa's two gates, wanted to raise the black banner over the border crossing, something Abu Azzam opposed. Al-Absi was kidnapped and killed in September 2012, most likely by the Farouq, although they haven't admitted it. The jihadis retaliated in early January, killing Abu Azzam's successor, Abu Ali, at Bab al-Hawa. In several meetings with TIME over the past year, Abu Azzam has repeatedly said the Farouq will not allow Islamic extremists to "hijack" the revolution. There was a knock at the door. A cleric with a long gray beard, in a flowing white galabiya (a loose, floor-length robe) and a vest over it, entered the house. Em Mohammad and most of the men in the room were asked to sit in another room while Abu Azzam met the man. "Please wait with the chief of staff," Abu Azzam said, laughing, referring to his mother. Other men in the Farouq jokingly call Em Mohammad "Anissa," after Bashar Assad's mother Anissa, a woman who some say acts as her son's key adviser and is actually the real power behind the regime. That Em Mohammad is respected among the Farouq for her warmth, savviness and strength is without question, and those qualities would soon come to the fore in the hours ahead. The meeting was brief and the sheikh didn't stay for lunch, which was placed on a black plastic sheet on the floor as is customary. Store-bought kebabs, grilled tomatoes and green peppers, as well as minted yogurt were laid out. Flat Arabic bread was passed around. "This is the first thing I've eaten all day," Abu Azzam said. It was almost 4:30 p.m. ( MORE: How Islamist Rebels in Syria Are Ruling a Fallen Provincial Capital ) The three men seated around him, Bandar, Ramadan and Badr, were all old friends from the central city of Homs who studied at the university there. The four men all lived together before the Syrian revolution. When the uprising became armed, Abu Azzam, a fourth-year Arabic-literature student living in the city, joined the Farouq as did most of his friends. The Farouq Brigades emerged from Homs and nearby Rastan just months into the Syrian uprising, now two years old. In the period since, operating under the FSA umbrella, they have formed units across the country, from Daraa in the south near the Jordanian border to the northern region bordering Turkey. The brigades take the name Farouq from Omar bin al-Khatab, a companion of the Prophet Muhammad, political architect of the caliphate and, historically, the second Caliph. The men recalled their university days with laughter. The mood was light. "I've lost so much weight in this revolution," Bandar said, laughing. "Do you remember how we used to cook in Homs?" Abu Azzam's specialty was molokhia , green leaves that are carefully picked and turned into a viscous green soup served with chicken and plain rice. Ramadan recounted an incident that had happened earlier in the day in Raqqa city that TIME also witnessed. He had stopped at a street-side coffee stall in his white pickup truck that has a black flag bearing the Muslim shahada (There is no god but God, and Muhammad is his Prophet) mounted on it. Three teenage girls walked past, two in hijabs, tight jeans and figure-hugging sweaters that extended to their thighs, the third in a black abaya. The third girl looked at the armed men in the truck and brazenly took off her abaya. Under it, she was dressed like her friends. "She must have thought we were Jabhat because of the flag and wanted to make a point!" Ramadan said. "So I turned up the music so she would know that we weren't." He continued proudly: "See, this is Raqqa, and the Jabhat thinks it's going to control it?" ( PHOTOS: From the Front Lines: Syria by Narciso Contreras ) Lunch was cleared and the men said their goodbyes. Abu Mansour, Abu Azzam's deputy who is also his cousin, walked into the room, bid his cousin farewell and told him he was going to check on his family just across the border in the Turkish town of Akcakale. Abu Mansour walked the short distance home. His niece had just served steaming-hot Turkish coffee, but before Abu Mansour could take a sip, one of his two cell phones rang. "What! Where are you? I'm coming now!" he said into the phone before jumping up, shoving his local Alhamraa cigarettes and his phones into his leather jacket and rushing out the door. It was a little before 5 p.m. and Abu Azzam had just been shot. Minutes earlier, on the other side of the border, Abu Azzam had also received a phone call, from one of his men. The Jabhat had set up a random checkpoint at a spot dubbed Liberation Roundabout on the main road in Tal Abyad and were detaining Farouq fighters and trying to disarm them. A few days earlier, 11 Farouq men were picked up by the Jabhat in town. Abu Azzam grabbed a BKC machine gun and ran out the door to intercede on behalf of his men. According to Em Mohammad, he didn't ask any of his men to come with him but two followed him anyway. He had just reached the roundabout and stepped out of his car when a member of the Jabhat reportedly tossed a hand grenade in his direction before others opened fire. The melee was over within minutes, and Abu Azzam, as well as several other wounded men, were being ferried by passersby to the border crossing into Turkey, where Abu Mansour was waiting to rush his bloodied commander in a taxi to the local hospital in Akcakale. ( PHOTOS: The Swallows of Syria ) The hospital foyer was crowded with unarmed Farouq fighters in plainclothes, as well as others. Em Mohammad paced up and down. She was carrying a blue garbage bag containing her son's clothes. She held up his indigo jeans. They were bloodied and there was a tear above the right knee. Abu Azzam was shot in the left side of his abdomen, both his hands were bandaged and he sufferd shrapnel wounds to both legs, as well as above his right eye. One of the Farouq men's phone rang. "Don't do anything until we get men and ammunition," he told the caller. "Calm down! Calm the men down! Here, speak to Em Mohammad and do whatever she says." Em Mohammad took the phone. "Please, you are all my sons. This is not the time for rash decisions. We must be smart. Calm down. We are all angry. This has become personal but we don't want unnecessary loss of life. Please calm the men down, I'm counting on you." Abu Azzam was wheeled into the nearby X-ray room. His mother leaned forward gently through the crowd to cover his naked shoulder with the pale mauve sheet. One of the two Farouq fighters was lying on a gurney in the emergency room. He looked to be about 20 years old and was dressed in military camouflage pants and an aqua t-shirt. He had a shrapnel wound to his left ankle, which was bandaged. Tears welled in his eyes. "They shot Abu Azzam!" he said, before asking one of his colleagues for water, a request denied on doctor's orders. "Then let me go back out there and fight!" he said. "Let me fight them!" he said, crying. A gurney with a pale mauve sheet covering a dead man was wheeled out of the emergency room into the foyer, and toward the elevator to be taken to the morgue. The crowd in the foyer gathered around it as the sheet was lifted to reveal the man's face. he had shoulder-length hair, and also looked to be in his early 20s. Em Mohammad and members of the Farouq didn't recognize him, but a short man with a closely-cropped graying beard did. The dead man was a member of Jabhat al-Nusra, the short man claimed, before offering the dead man's name. Em Mohammad started crying. "He's so young, may God rest his soul," she said, a generous sentiment given that the man had apparently just tried to kill herson. ( MORE: The Destruction of a Nation: Syria's War Revealed in Satellite Imagery ) Soon after, another dead man was also wheeled out, also identified by the short man as a member of Jabhat al-Nusra. "They have eyes and ears everywhere," Em Mohammad said, referring to the short man. There were other characters in the foyer, men who were identified to TIME as Turkish intelligence agents. By 6 p.m., four policemen were guarding the entrance of the hospital and using a hand-held metal detector to check everyone coming through the doors. Abu Azzam was to be transferred to a bigger hospital in Sanliurfa some 53 kilometers away. He let out a cry of pain as he was wheeled into a waiting ambulance. A thin stream of fresh blood escaped from under the large bandage over his right eye. (As of Tuesday, the Farouq commander was still in hospital, under Turkish guard, in a stable condition.) Later on Sunday night, Abu Azzam's sister and other female relatives crossed into Turkey in the dark, along with their children. They were taken to Abu Mansour's home. Two Farouq men sat outside the front door, guarding it although they were both unarmed. One, a man in a black and gray tracksuit, sat on the stairs. With deep sadness, he said that the day's events had made him want to forget about the revolution. "If this is what it has come to - to us fighting each other - then I want to sit at home and support Bashar," he said. His view was not shared by most of the Farouq who were itching for a fight. By Monday, no fewer than five Farouq liwas (or brigades although the term doesn't strictly correlate to a brigade in the modern military sense) were on their way to Tal Abyad from the provinces of Aleppo and Idlib. There have been clashes in Tal Abyad between the two groups although by Monday afternoon the border crossing was reopened. Abu Mansour, Abu Azzam's deputy, said the Jabhat approached him and requested that the matter between the two groups be resolved in a Sharia court. As a goodwill gesture, they released 11 Farouq fighters as well as 22 others they had picked up earlier. They were also forced to retreat out of the various positions they occupied in Tal Abyad to their main base in the town. "The problem is that they have forgotten that we are all fighting Bashar," Abu Mansour said of the Jabhat. "They want an Islamic emirate. They say that they are Islamists and we are apostates, but we will not accept that they have any sway or authority over us or others. May God heal Abu Azzam, that is the main thing, but in every province now, we will fight them." http://world.time.com/2013/03/26/in-syria-the-rebels-have-begun-to-fight-among-themselves/

World Trade Center controlled demolition conspiracy theories

fdal — Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:13:08 -0400

World Trade Center controlled demolition conspiracy theories From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Aerial view of the debris field of the North Tower, 6 WTC, and 7 WTC (upper right) World Trade Center controlled demolition conspiracy theories contend that the collapse of the World Trade Center was not caused by the airliner crash damage that occurred as part of the September 11, 2001 attacks, and the resulting fire damage, but by explosives installed in the buildings in advance. Early advocates such as physicist Steven E. Jones, architect Richard Gage, software engineer Jim Hoffman, and theologian David Ray Griffin, argued that the aircraft impacts and resulting fires could not have weakened the buildings sufficiently to initiate a catastrophic collapse, and that the buildings would not have collapsed completely, nor at the speeds that they did, without additional energy involved to weaken their structures. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the magazine Popular Mechanics examined and rejected these theories. Specialists in structural mechanics and structural engineering accept the model of a fire-induced, gravity-driven collapse of the World Trade Center buildings, an explanation that does not involve the use of explosives. NIST did not test for explosive compound residue in steel samples, stating the potential for inconclusive results, and noting that similar compounds would have been present during construction of the towers. In 2006, Jones suggested that thermite or super-thermite may have been used by government insiders with access to such materials and to the buildings themselves, to demolish the buildings. In April 2009, Jones, Niels H. Harrit and seven other authors published a paper in The Open Chemical Physics Journal, causing the editor, Prof. Marie-Paule Pileni, to resign as she accused the publisher of printing it without her knowledge and that she'd already had suspicions that the "Bentham Scientific" publisher ran pseudo-scientific journals; this article was titled 'Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe', and stated that they had found evidence of nano-thermite in samples of the dust that was produced during the collapse of the World Trade Center towers. NIST responded that there was no "clear chain of custody" to prove that the four samples of dust came from the WTC site. Jones invited NIST to conduct its own studies using its own known "chain of custody" dust, but NIST did not investigate. Contents 1 History 2 Propositions and hypotheses 2.1 Main towers 2.2 7 World Trade Center 2.2.1 NIST Report 3 Reactions 4 See also 5 References 6 External links History Questions related to the technical details of the collapse of the buildings of the World Trade Center have been debated for years, including rebuttals and ridicule. Controlled demolition conspiracy theories were first suggested in October 2001. Eric Hufschmid's book, Painful Questions: An Analysis of the September 11th Attack, in which the controlled demolition theory is explicitly advocated, was published in September 2002. David Ray Griffin and Steven E. Jones are the two most prominent advocates of the theory. Griffin's book The New Pearl Harbor, published in 2004, has become a reference work for the 9/11 Truth movement. In the same year, Griffin published the book The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions, in which he argues that flaws in the commission's report amounts to a cover-up by government officials and says that the Bush administration was complicit in the 9/11 attacks. Griffin theorized in a June 2010 article that those in the alleged false flag operation wanted the buildings to fall straight down. If they had toppled over, they would have destroyed dozens of other buildings and killed tens of thousands of people. Steven E. Jones has been a leading academic voice of the proponents of demolition theories. In 2006, he published the paper "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?". Brigham Young University responded to Jones' "increasingly speculative and accusatory" statements by placing him on paid leave, and thereby stripping him of two classes, in September 2006, pending a review of his statements and research. Six weeks later, Jones retired from the university. The structural engineering faculty at the university issued a statement which said that they "do not support the hypotheses of Professor Jones". David Ray Griffin has questioned the "pancake collapse" theory suggested in the Building Performance Study produced by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). NIST's report on the collapse of the WTC towers rejected the theory in favor of the column failure theory. In its final report, NIST stated that it "found no corroborating evidence for alternative hypotheses suggesting that the WTC towers were brought down by controlled demolition using explosives planted prior to September 11, 2001" and posted a FAQ about related issues on its website in August 2006. The major elements of the theory have been rebutted by mainstream engineering scholarship, where its proponents are considered "outsiders". The magazine Popular Mechanics challenged the theories in the special report "Debunking the 9/11 Myths". Articles, letters and comments by controlled demolition advocates have been published in scientific and engineering journals. In April 2008, a letter titled "Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction," was published by Steven E. Jones, Frank Legge, Kevin Ryan, Anthony Szamboti and James Gourley in The Open Civil Engineering Journal. A few months later, in July 2008, an article titled "Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center: evidence for energetic materials," was published by Ryan, Gourley and Jones in the Environmentalist. Later that same year, in October 2008, the Journal of Engineering Mechanics published a comment by chemical engineer and attorney James R. Gourley, in which he describes what he considered fundamental errors in a 2007 paper on the mechanics of progressive collapse by Bazant and Verdure. In the same issue, Bazant and Le rebutted Gourley's arguments, finding his criticisms scientifically incorrect. They suggested future critics should "become acquainted with the relevant material from an appropriate textbook on structural mechanics" or risk "misleading and wrongly influencing the public with incorrect information." In April 2009, Danish chemist Niels H. Harrit, of the University of Copenhagen, and eight other authors published a paper in The Open Chemical Physics Journal, titled, "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe." The paper concludes that chips consisting of unreacted and partially reacted super-thermite, or nano-thermite, appear to be present in samples of the dust. Internet websites and videos have contributed to the growth of the movement of individuals supporting the theory that planted explosives destroyed the World Trade Center. The website of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth cites the membership of over 1,500 architects and engineers. The controlled demolition theory often includes allegations that U.S. government insiders planned and / or participated in the destruction of the WTC in order to justify the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan. The theory features prominently in popular entertainment type movies, such as Loose Change, as well as more documentary type films, such as 9/11: Blueprint for Truth, by San Francisco-area architect Richard Gage, which are based mainly on presentations of scientific and engineering evidence for the controlled demolition theory. While mainstream press has a significant history of derogatory labels, descriptions and interpretations of demolition theory advocates (i.e., in 2006, the magazine New York reported that a "new generation of conspiracy theorists is at work on a secret history of New York's most terrible day." ), the theory has been supported by a number of popular actors, musicians and politicians, including Charlie Sheen, Willie Nelson, former Governor of Minnesota Jesse Ventura, talkshow host Rosie O'Donnell, and actors Ed Asner and Daniel Sunjata. Propositions and hypotheses Main towers On September 11, the North Tower (1 WTC) was hit by American Airlines Flight 11 and the South Tower (2 WTC) was hit by United Airlines Flight 175, both Boeing 767 aircraft. The South Tower collapsed 56 minutes after the impact, and the North Tower collapsed 102 minutes after. An investigation by NIST concluded that the collapse was caused by a combination of damage to support columns and fire insulation from the aircraft impacts and the weakening of columns and floors by jet fuel ignited fires. NIST also found "no corroborating evidence for alternative hypotheses suggesting that the WTC towers were brought down by controlled demolition using explosives planted prior to September 11, 2001". Physicist Steven E. Jones, among others, points to many descriptions by individuals working on the WTC rubble pile suggesting the presence of molten steel in the pile and a stream of molten metal that poured out of the South Tower before it collapsed as evidence of temperatures beyond those produced by the fire. Jones has argued that the molten metal may have been elemental iron, a product of a thermite reaction. Jones and other researchers analyzed samples of dust from the World Trade Center buildings and reported their findings for evidence of nano-thermite in the dust. Jones informed NIST of his findings and NIST responded that there was no "clear chain of custody" proving that the dust indeed came from the WTC site. Jones invited NIST to conduct its own studies with dust under custody of NIST itself, but NIST has not done so. NIST found that the condition of the steel in the wreckage of the towers does not provide conclusive information on the condition of the building before the collapse and concluded that the material coming from the South Tower was molten aluminum from the plane, which would have melted at lower temperatures than steel. NIST also pointed out that cutting through the vertical columns would require planting an enormous amount of explosives inconspicuously in highly secured buildings, then igniting it remotely while keeping it in contact with the columns. The Energetic Materials Research and Testing Center performed a test with conventional thermite and was unable to cut a vertical column, despite the column being much smaller than those used in the World Trade Center. Jones and others have responded that they do not believe that thermite was used, but rather a form of thermite called nano-thermite, a nanoenergetic material which developed for military use, propellants, explosives, or pyrotechnics. Historically, explosive applications for traditional thermites have been limited by their relatively slow energy release rates. But because nano-thermites are created from reactant particles with proximities approaching the atomic scale, energy release rates are far improved. The NIST report provides an analysis of the structural response of the building only up to the point where collapse begins, and asserts that the enormous kinetic energy transferred by the falling part of the building makes progressive collapse inevitable once an initial collapse occurs. A paper by Zdenek Bazant indicates that once collapse began, the kinetic energy imparted by a falling upper section onto the floor below was an order of magnitude greater than that which the lower section could support. Engineers who have investigated the collapses generally disagree that controlled demolition is required to understand the structural response of the buildings. While the top of one of the towers did tilt significantly, it could not ultimately have fallen into the street, they argue, because any such tilting would place sufficient stress on the lower story (acting as a pivot) that it would collapse long before the top had sufficiently shifted its center of gravity. Indeed, they argue, there is very little difference between progressive collapse with or without explosives in terms of the resistance that the structures could provide after collapse began. Controlled demolition of a building to code requires weeks of preparation, including laying large quantities of explosive and cutting through beams, which would have rendered the building highly dangerous and which would have to be done without attracting the attention of the thousands of people who worked in the building. Controlled demolition is traditionally done from the bottom of buildings rather than the top, although there are exceptions depending on structural design. There is little dispute that the collapse started high up at the point where the aircraft struck. Furthermore any explosives would have to withstand the impact of the airliners. Members of the group Scholars for 9/11 Truth have collected eyewitness accounts of flashes and loud explosions immediately before the fall. Eyewitnesses have repeatedly reported of explosions happening before the collapse of the WTC towers, and the organization "International Center for 9/11 Studies" has published videos obtained from NIST, together with indications about when such explosions could be heard. There are many types of loud sharp noises that are not caused by explosives, and seismographic records of the collapse do not show evidence of explosions. Physicist Steven E. Jones and others have argued that horizontal puffs of smoke seen during the collapse of the towers would indicate that the towers had been brought down by controlled explosions. NIST attributes these puffs to air pressure, created by the decreasing volume of the falling building above, traveling down elevator shafts and exiting from the open elevator shaft doors on lower levels). In September 2011 Iranian President Ahmadinejad, who holds a PhD in Transportation Engineering and Planning, said that it would have been impossible for two jetliners to bring down the towers simply by hitting them and that some kind of planned explosion must have taken place. Al-Qaida sharply criticised Ahmadinejad in their English-language publication, Inspire, calling his assertions "a ridiculous belief that stands in the face of all logic and evidence". 7 World Trade Center The position of 7 WTC in relation to the other WTC buildings. WTC 1, 2, and 7 collapsed on September 11, 2001. Proponents of World Trade Center controlled demolition theories allege that 7 World Trade Center-a 47-story skyscraper that stood across Vesey Street north of the main part of the World Trade Center site-was intentionally destroyed with explosives. Unlike the Twin Towers, 7 World Trade Center was not hit by a plane, although it was hit by debris from the Twin Towers and was damaged by fires which burned for seven hours, until it collapsed completely at about 5:20 p.m. on the evening of September 11 (a new building has been erected on the site of the old and opened in May 2006). Several videos of the collapse event exist in the public domain, thus enabling comparative analysis from different angles of perspective. Proponents typically say the collapse of 7 World Trade Center was not mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report and that the federal body charged with investigating the event, NIST, required seven years to conduct its investigation and issue a report. In November 2010, Fox News reporter Geraldo Rivera hosted members of a television ad campaign called "BuildingWhat?", a series of commercials in which 9/11 family members ask questions about 7 World Trade Center and call for an investigation into its collapse. Rivera called the television ads "not so easy to dismiss as those demonstrators were," and stated that, "If explosives were involved, that would mean the most obnoxious protesters in recent years ... were right." Days later, Rivera appeared on the program Freedom Watch with legal analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano on the Fox Business Network to discuss the BuildingWhat? TV ad campaign. Napolitano stated, "It's hard for me to believe that came down by itself. I was gratified to see Geraldo Rivera investigating it." FOX News was heavily criticized for airing programs questioning the basis for the collapse of 7 World Trade Center by the internet media groups Media Matters and Newsbusters. Some proponents of World Trade Center controlled demolition theories suggest that 7 WTC was demolished because it may have served as an operational center for the demolition of the Twin Towers, while others suggest that government insiders may have wanted to destroy key files held in the building pertaining to corporate fraud. The WTC buildings housed dozens of federal, state and local government agencies. According to a statement reported by the BBC, Loose Change film producer Dylan Avery thinks the destruction of the building was suspicious because it housed some unusual tenants, including a clandestine CIA office on the 25th floor, an outpost of the U.S. Secret Service, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and New York City's emergency command center. The former chief counter-terrorism adviser to the President, Richard Clarke, does not think that 7 WTC is mysterious, and said that anyone could have rented floor space in the building. No steel frame high rise had ever before collapsed because of a fire, although there had been previous cases of collapses or partial collapses of smaller steel buildings due to fire. However, 7 WTC also sustained significant structural damage from 1 WTC debris after its collapse. BBC News reported the collapse of 7 WTC twenty minutes before it actually fell. The BBC has stated that many news sources were reporting the imminent collapse of 7 WTC on the day of the attacks. Jane Standley, the reporter who announced the collapse prematurely, called it a "very small and very honest mistake" caused by her thinking on her feet after being confronted with a report she had no way of checking. In the PBS documentary America Rebuilds, which aired in September 2002, Larry Silverstein, the owner of 7 WTC and leaseholder and insurance policy holder for the remainder of the WTC complex, recalled a discussion with the fire department in which doubts about containing the fires were expressed. Silverstein recalled saying, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it". "They made that decision to pull", he recalled, "and we watched the building collapse." Silverstein issued a statement that it was the firefighting team, not the building, that was to be pulled. NIST Report In 2002, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) began a general investigation into the collapse of the World Trade Center but soon made a decision to focus first on the collapse of the Twin Towers. A draft version of its final report on the collapse of 7 WTC was released in August 2008. The agency has blamed the slowness of this investigation on the complexity of the computer model it used, which simulated the collapse from the moment it begins all the way to the ground; and NIST says the time taken on the investigation into 7 WTC is comparable to the time taken to investigate an aircraft crash. The agency also says another 80 boxes of documents related to 7 WTC were found and had to be analyzed. These delays fueled suspicion the agency was struggling to come up with a plausible conclusion. NIST released its final report on the collapse of 7 World Trade Center on November 20, 2008. Investigators used videos, photographs and building design documents to come to their conclusions. The investigation could not include physical evidence as the materials from the building lacked characteristics allowing them to be positively identified and were therefore disposed of prior to the initiation of the investigation. The report concluded that the building's collapse was due to the effects of the fires which burned for almost seven hours. The fatal blow to the building came when the 13th floor collapsed, weakening a critical steel support column that led to catastrophic failure, and extreme heat caused some steel beams to lose strength, causing further failures throughout the buildings until the entire structure succumbed. Also cited as a factor was the collapse of the nearby towers, which broke the city water main, leaving the sprinkler system in the bottom half of the building without water. NIST considered the possibility that 7 WTC was brought down with explosives and concluded that a blast event did not occur, that the "use of thermite to sever columns in 7 WTC on 9/11/01 was unlikely". The investigation cited as evidence the claim that no blast was audible on recordings of the collapse and that no blast was reported by witnesses, stating that it would have been audible at a level of 130-140 decibels at a distance of half a mile. Demolition proponents say eyewitnesses repeatedly reported explosions happening before the collapse of the towers, and have published videos obtained from NIST, together with indications about when such explosions could be heard in support of the sounds of explosions before collapse. NIST also concluded that it is unlikely that the quantities of thermite needed could have been carried into the building undetected. Demolition advocates have responded that they do not claim that thermite was used, but rather that nano-thermite, far more powerful than thermite, was used. Finally, the theory that fires from the large amount of diesel fuel stored in the building caused the collapse was also investigated and ruled out. Reactions The structural engineering community rejects the controlled-demolition conspiracy theory. Its consensus is that the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings was a fire-induced, gravity-driven collapse, an explanation that does not involve the use of explosives. The American Society of Civil Engineers Structural Engineering Institute issued a statement calling for further discussion of NIST's recommendations, and Britain's Institution of Structural Engineers published a statement in May 2002 welcoming the FEMA report, noting that the report expressed similar views to those held by its group of professionals. Following the publication of Jones' paper "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?" Brigham Young University responded to Jones' "increasingly speculative and accusatory" statements by placing him on paid leave, and thereby stripping him of two classes, in September 2006, pending a review of his statements and research. Six weeks later, Jones retired from the university. The structural engineering faculty at the university issued a statement which said that they "do not support the hypotheses of Professor Jones". On September 22, 2005, Jones gave a seminar on his hypotheses to a group of his colleagues from the Department of Physics and Astronomy at BYU. According to Jones, all but one of his colleagues agreed after the seminar that an investigation was in order and the lone dissenter came to agreement with Jones' suggestions the next day. Northwestern University Professor of Civil Engineering Zdenek Bazant, who was the first to offer a published peer-reviewed theory of the collapses, wrote "a few outsiders claiming a conspiracy with planted explosives" as an exception. Bazant and Verdure trace such "strange ideas" to a "mistaken impression" that safety margins in design would make the collapses impossible. One of the effects of a more detailed modeling of the progressive collapse, they say, could be to "dispel the myth of planted explosives". Indeed, Bazant and Verdure have proposed examining data from controlled demolitions in order to better model the progressive collapse of the towers, suggesting that progressive collapse and controlled demolition are not two separate modes of failure (as the controlled-demolition conspiracy theory assumes). Thomas Eagar, a professor of materials science and engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, also dismissed the controlled-demolition conspiracy theory. Eagar remarked, "These people (in the 9/11 truth movement) use the 'reverse scientific method.' They determine what happened, throw out all the data that doesn't fit their conclusion, and then hail their findings as the only possible conclusion." Regarding Jones' theory that nanothermite was used to bring down the towers, and the assertion that thermite and nanothermite composites were found in the dust and debris were found following the collapse of the three buildings, which was concluded to be proof that explosives brought down the buildings, Brent Blanchard, author of "A History of Explosive Demolition in America", states that questions about the viability of Jones' theories remain unanswered, such as the fact that no demolition personnel noticed any telltale signs of thermite during the eight months of debris removal following the towers' collapse. Blanchard also stated that a verifiable chain of possession needs to be established for the tested beams, which did not occur with the beams Jones tested, raising questions of whether the metal pieces tested could have been cut away from the debris pile with acetylene torches, shears, or other potentially contaminated equipment while on site, or exposed to trace amounts of thermite or other compounds while being handled, while in storage, or while being transferred from Ground Zero to memorial sites. Dave Thomas of Skeptical Inquirer magazine, noting that the residue in question was claimed to be thermitic because of its iron oxide and aluminum composition, pointed out that these substances are found in many items common to the towers. Thomas stated that in order to cut through a vertical steel beam, special high-temperature containment must be added to prevent the molten iron from dropping down, and that the thermite reaction is too slow for it to be practically used in building demolition. Thomas pointed out that when Jesse Ventura hired New Mexico Tech to conduct a demonstration showing nanothermite slicing through a large steel beam, the nanothermite produced copious flame and smoke but no damage to the beam, even though it was in a horizontal, and therefore optimal position. Preparing a building for a controlled demolition takes considerable time and effort. The tower walls would have had to be opened on dozens of floors. Thousands of pounds of explosives, fuses and ignition mechanisms would need to be sneaked past security and placed in the towers without the tens of thousands of people working in the World Trade Center noticing. Referring to a conversation with Stuart Vyse, a professor of psychology, an article in the Hartford Advocate asks, "How many hundreds of people would you need to acquire the explosives, plant them in the buildings, arrange for the airplanes to crash and, perhaps most implausibly of all, never breathe a single word of this conspiracy?" World Trade Center developer Larry Silverstein said, "Hopefully this thorough report puts to rest the various 9/11 conspiracy theories, which dishonor the men and women who lost their lives on that terrible day." Upon presentation of the NIST's detailed report on the failure of Bldg. 7, Richard Gage, leader of the group Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth said, "How much longer do we have to endure the coverup of how Building 7 was destroyed?" in which Dr. S. Shyam Sunder, the lead NIST investigator said he could not explain why the skepticism would not die. "I am really not a psychologist," he said. "Our job was to come up with the best science." James Quintiere, professor of fire protection engineering at the University of Maryland, who does not believe explosives brought down the towers, questioned how the agency came to its conclusions, remarking, "They don't have the expertise on explosives," though he adds that NIST wasted time employing outside experts to consider it. See also 9/11 conspiracy theories References 1.^ a b c d e Clarke, Steve. "Conspiracy Theories and the Internet: Controlled Demolition and Arrested Development". Episteme, Volume 4, Issue 2, 2007, pp. 167-180. 2.^ a b c d e f Bazant, Zdenek P.; Mathieu Verdure (March 2007). "Mechanics of Progressive Collapse: Learning from World Trade Center and Building Demolitions". J Engrg Mech 133 (3): 308-319. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:3(308). Archived from the original on 2007-08-09. Retrieved 2007-08-22. "As generally accepted by the community of specialists in structural mechanics and structural engineering (though not by a few outsiders claiming a conspiracy with planted explosives), the failure scenario was as follows " 3.^ a b c d e Gravois, John (June 23, 2006). "Professors of Paranoia? Academics give a scholarly stamp to 9/11 conspiracy theories". The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved 2007-01-24. "Thomas W. Eagar is one scientist who has paid some attention to the demolition hypothesis - albeit grudgingly. A materials engineer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Mr. Eagar wrote one of the early papers on the buildings' collapses, which later became the basis for a documentary on PBS. That marked him for scrutiny and attack from conspiracy theorists. For a time, he says, he was receiving one or two angry e-mail messages each week, many accusing him of being a government shill. When Mr. Jones's paper came out, the nasty messages increased to one or two per day." 4.^ Asquith, Christina (2006-09-07). "Conspiracies continue to abound surrounding 9/11: on the eve of the fifth anniversary, a group of professors say the attacks were an "inside job."". Diverse Issues in Higher Education: 12. Retrieved 2008-10-09. 5.^ "NIST's Investigation of the Sept. 11 World Trade Center Disaster". NIST. August, 2006. Archived from the original on 2010-05-22. Retrieved June 13, 2010. 6.^ a b c d e f g h i Jim Dwyer (September 2, 2006). "2 U.S. Reports Seek to Counter Conspiracy Theories About 9/11". New York Times. Retrieved April 30, 2009. 7.^ a b Dean, Suzanne (April 10, 2006). "Physicist says heat substance felled WTC". Deseret Morning News. Retrieved May 7, 2009. 8.^ a b Barber, Peter (June 7, 2008). "The truth is out there". Financial Times. Retrieved May 23, 2009. 9.^ "Great Day Talks To Architect Richard Gage About 9/11". KMPH Fox 26. Retrieved May 28, 2009. 10.^ Hoffmann, Thomas (April 28, 2009). "Chefredaktor skrider efter kontroversiel artikel om 9/11". Videnskab. Retrieved November 15, 2009. "Mailen far hende til med det samme at smaekke med doren til tidsskriftet." 11.^ Oder, Norman. "Hoax Article Accepted by "Peer-Reviewed" OA Bentham Journal". Retrieved 2011-01-01. 12.^ a b c d e Harrit, Niels H.; Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen (2009-04-03). "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe". The Open Chemical Physics Journal 2 (1). doi:10.2174/1874412500902010007. Archived from the original on October 26, 2010. Retrieved October 11, 2010. 13.^ a b Levin, Jay; McKenzie, Tom (September 17, 2009). "The Elements of a Great Scientific and Technical Dispute". Santa Barbara Independent. Retrieved September 19, 2009. 14.^ Harper, Jennifer (February 22, 2010). "Explosive News". Washington Times. Retrieved February 23, 2010. 15.^ Reid, Sue (February 9, 2007). "An explosion of disbelief - fresh doubts over 9/11". Daily Mail. Retrieved May 14, 2009. 16.^ a b Powell, Michael (September 8, 2006). "The Disbelievers". The Washington Post. Retrieved June 1, 2009. "The loose agglomeration known as the '9/11 Truth Movement'" 17.^ Barber, Peter (June 7, 2008). "The truth is out there". Retrieved May 23, 2009. 18.^ "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions". Book TV on C-SPAN2. Top Nonfiction Authors Every Weekend. July 3, 2005. Retrieved May 15, 2009. 19.^ Did 9/11 Justify The War In Afghanistan? David Ray Griffen for countercurrents.org June 26, 2010 20.^ Rudin, Mike (July 4, 2008). "The evolution of a conspiracy theory". BBC. Retrieved May 23, 2009. 21.^ a b Walch, Tad (September 8, 2006). "BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave". Deseret Morning News. Retrieved 2009-01-04. Sullivan, Will (September 11, 2006). "BYU takes on a 9/11 conspiracy professor". U.S. News & World Report (www.usnews.com). Retrieved April 26, 2009. "BYU Professor Who Believes WTC Brought Down by Explosives Resigns". Fox News. October 21, 2006. Retrieved May 15, 2009. Walch, Tad (October 22, 2006). "BYU professor in dispute over 9/11 will retire". Deseret Morning News. Retrieved May 15, 2009. "Steven E. Jones. Retired Professor". Brigham Young University. Archived from the original on 2010-07-05. Retrieved May 6, 2009. 22.^ a b c McIlvain, Ryan (2005-12-05). "Censor rumors quelled". BYU NewsNet. Retrieved 2009-08-25. 23.^ Griffin, David Ray (September 10, 2006). "David Ray Griffin interview". CBC News. Retrieved May 4, 2009. 24.^ a b c d NIST (2006-08). "Answers to Frequently Asked Questions". Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster. Archived from the original on 2010-05-22. Retrieved 2006-01-12. 25.^ Sunder, Shyam (2005). "Consideration of Public Comments". NIST Response to the World Trade Center Disaster. National Institute of Standards and Technology. 26.^ Bazant, Z. K. P.; Le, J. L.; Greening, F. R.; Benson, D. B. (2008). "What Did and Did Not Cause Collapse of World Trade Center Twin Towers in New York?". Journal of Engineering Mechanics (American Society of Civil Engineers) 134 (10): 892. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2008)134:10(892). 27.^ Potocki, P. "Popular Mechanics Debunking the 9-11 Myths: Special report, 2008". Retrieved Feb 22, 2012. 28.^ Steven E. Jones, Frank M. Legge, Kevin R. Ryan, Anthony F. Szamboti, James R. Gourley (2008). "Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction". Bentham Science Publishers. 29.^ Kevin R. Ryan, James R. Gourley, Steven E. Jones (2008). "Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center: evidence for energetic materials". Springer Netherlands, The Environmentalist, Online First. 30.^ Gourley, J. R. (2008). "Discussion of "Mechanics of Progressive Collapse: Learning from World Trade Center and Building Demolitions" by Zdenek P. Bazant and Mathieu Verdure". Journal of Engineering Mechanics (American Society of Civil Engineers) 134 (10): 915-916. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2008)134:10(915). 31.^ Bazant, Z. K. P.; Verdure, M. (2007). "Mechanics of Progressive Collapse: Learning from World Trade Center and Building Demolitions". Journal of Engineering Mechanics (American Society of Civil Engineers) 133 (3): 308-319. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:3(308). 32.^ Bazant, Z. K. P.; Le, J. L. (2008). "Closure to "Mechanics of Progressive Collapse: Learning from World Trade Center and Building Demolitions" by Zdenek P. Bazant and Mathieu Verdure". Journal of Engineering Mechanics (American Society of Civil Engineers) 134 (10): 917-921. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2008)134:10(917). "The interdisciplinary interests of Gourley, a chemical engineer with a doctorate in jurisprudence, are appreciated. Although none of the discusser's criticisms is scientifically correct, his discussion provides a welcome opportunity to dispel doubts recently voiced by some in the community outside structural mechanics and engineering." 33.^ Bazant, Z. K. P.; Le, J. L. (2008). "Closure to "Mechanics of Progressive Collapse: Learning from World Trade Center and Building Demolitions" by Zdenek P. Bazant and Mathieu Verdure". Journal of Engineering Mechanics (American Society of Civil Engineers) 134 (10): 917-921. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2008)134:10(917). "Although everyone is certainly entitled to express his or her opinion on any issue of concern, interested critics should realize that, to help discern the truth about an engineering problem such as the WTC collapse, it is necessary to become acquainted with the relevant material from an appropriate textbook on structural mechanics. Otherwise critics run the risk of misleading and wrongly influencing the public with incorrect information." 34.^ Politiken: Konspirationsteorier om 9/11 far nyt liv, Jyllands Posten: Forskere: Spraengstof i stovet fra WTC, Ekstra Bladet: Mystik om WTC: Nano-termit i tarne, Kristeligt Dagblad: Dansker genopliver konspirationsteori om 11. september, Videnskab: Dansk forsker: Eksplosivt nanomateriale fundet i stovet fra World Trade Center. The journal Videnskab is sponsored by the Danish Ministry for Science and Technology. Archived July 19, 2011 at the Wayback Machine 35.^ "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth". Retrieved July 30, 2011. 36.^ a b Eric Lipton (August 22, 2008). "Fire, Not Explosives, Felled 3rd Tower on 9/11, Report Says". New York Times. 37.^ Pilkington, Ed (January 26, 2007). "'They're all forced to listen to us'". The Guardian (London). Retrieved May 6, 2009. 38.^ Moskowitz, Eric (November 29, 2007). "Airing of 9/11 film ignites debate". The Boston Globe. Retrieved May 23, 2009. 39.^ Mark Jacobson (March 2006). "The Ground Zero Grassy Knoll". New York Magazine. 40.^ "CNN.com - Transcripts". Transcripts.cnn.com. Retrieved 2008-10-30. 41.^ "Charlie Sheen doesn't buy 9/11 spin". The Boston Herald. 2006-03-23. 42.^ Fox News 43.^ Ventura Regrets Not Being More Skeptical Over 9/11. Retrieved on April 8, 2008. 44.^ Dwyer, Jim (May 30, 2007). "A Notion From 9/11 Is Kept Alive". New York Times. Retrieved May 17, 2009. 45.^ "NIST NCSTAR 1-6: Structural Fire Response and Probable Collapse Sequence of the World Trade Center Towers". NIST. September 2005. pp. liv. Retrieved 2009-04-28. 46.^ "NIST NCSTAR 1: Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster: Final Report of the National Construction Safety Team on the Collapses of the World Trade Center Tower". NIST. September 2005. pp. xxxviii. Retrieved 2009-05-03. 47.^ "9/11: Science and Conspiracy". National Geographic. Retrieved 2009-09-16. 48.^ "Effect of Al particle size on the thermal degradation of Al/teflon mixtures". Informaworld.com. 2007-08-08. Retrieved 2010-03-03. 49.^ "NOVA Building on Ground Zero PBS". Pbs.org. Archived from the original on May 15, 2011. Retrieved 2008-10-30. 50.^ a b Wilkinson, Tim (2006-01-14). "World Trade Center - Some Engineering Aspects". University of Sydney School of Civil Engineering. Retrieved 2008-09-07. 51.^ Hunt, H.E. (November 19, 2008). "The 30 greatest conspiracy theories - part 1". The Daily Telegraph (London). Retrieved May 30, 2009. "Many witnesses - including firemen, policemen and people who were inside the towers at the time - say they heard explosions below the aircraft impacts (including in basement levels) and before both the collapses and the attacks themselves." 52.^ Asquith, Christina (September 5, 2006). "Who really blew up the twin towers?". The Guardian (London). Retrieved May 6, 2009. 53.^ a b "Neue Videos vom 11. September aufgetaucht". Bild. September 10, 2010. Archived from the original on 2010-09-11. Retrieved September 18, 2010. "Mehr als ein Dutzend der neuen Videos ist auf der Youtube-Seite des Zentrums zu finden. Unter den Videos stehen zum Teil Hinweise, wo solche Explosionen zu sehen oder h"oren sind. Augenzeugen hatten immer wieder von Explosionen berichtet, bevor die beiden T"urme zusammenbrachen." 54.^ Blanchard, Brent (2006). "A Critical Analysis of the Collapse of WTC Towers 1, 2 & 7 from an Explosives and Conventional Demolition Industry Viewpoint". implosionworld.com. Retrieved 2008-09-28. 55.^ "Seismic Spikes". Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report. Popular Mechanics. March 2005. Retrieved 2008-09-28. 56.^ Narain, Jaya (September 6, 2006). "Fury as academics claim 9/11 was 'inside job'". Daily Mail. Retrieved December 8, 2009. 57.^ Grossman, Lev (September 3, 2006). "Why the 9/11 Conspiracy Theories Won't Go Away". Time. o the 9/11 Truth Movement, as many conspiracy believers refer to their passion 58.^ Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report - Puffs Of Dust. Popular Mechanics. March 2005. 59.^ Gross, John L.; McAllister, Therese P. (September 2005). "NIST NCSTAR 1-6: Structural Fire Response and Probable Collapse Sequence of the World Trade Center Towers". NIST. p. 320. Retrieved 2009-03-21. 60.^ Diplomats depart as Ahmadinejad speaks Associated Press Published by Newsday September 22, 2011 61.^ Al-Qaida calls on Ahmadinejad to end 9/11 conspiracy theories. The Guardian (UK) 28 September 2011 62.^ "Videos Show Building 7's Vertical Collapse". wtc7.net. Retrieved 2011-07-30. 63.^ "7 Facts about Building 7". rememberbuilding7.org. Retrieved 2011-07-25. 64.^ Webster, Stephen C. (November 14, 2010). "Geraldo 'much more open minded' about 9/11 thanks to NYC television ads". The Raw Story. Retrieved 2011-07-27. 65.^ CNN Political Unit (December 1, 2010). "Fox takes heat from left and right over analysts". politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com. Retrieved 2011-07-27. 66.^ CNN Political Unit (December 1, 2010). "Fox takes heat from left and right over analysts". politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com. Retrieved 2011-07-27. 67.^ a b SALAZAR, CRISTIAN (July 30, 2011). "Mystery surrounds loss of records, art on 9/11". Associated Press. Retrieved 2011-07-30. 68.^ a b "Q&A: The Collapse of Tower 7". BBC. July 4, 2008. Retrieved 2008-07-05. 69.^ FEMA. World Trade Center Building Performance Study, p. 4. 70.^ "BBC Sept. 11, 2001 4:54 pm - 5:36 pm (September 11, 2001)". Archive.org. 2001-09-11. Retrieved November 9, 2010. 71.^ Porter, Richard. "Part of the conspiracy? (2)" March 2, 2007. The Editors, BBC. Archived 2 March 2007 at WebCite 72.^ The Weekend's TV: The Conspiracy Files: 9/11 - The Third Tower The Independent July 6, 2008. 73.^ "Identifying Misinformation: 9/11 Revealed?". usinfo.state.gov (as recorded by http://www.archive.org). 2005-09-16. Archived from the original on 2008-02-14. Retrieved 2009-04-30. 74.^ a b Barber, Peter (2008-06-07). "The Truth Is Out There - Part III". Financial Times. p. 14. Retrieved 2008-08-22. 75.^ a b c d e "Questions and Answers about the NIST 7 WTC Investigation". NIST. 2008-08-21. Archived from the original on 2010-11-18. Retrieved 2008-08-21. 76.^ "NIST NCSTAR 1A: Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7". NIST. November 2008. Retrieved 2009-04-25. 77.^ "NIST NCSTAR 1A: Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7". NIST. November 2008. p. 15. Retrieved 2010-04-26. 78.^ 9/11 Commission Report 79.^ "Testimony of Dr.James Harris, PhD, P.E.". American Society of Civil Engineers. October 26, 2005. Retrieved 2010-07-16. 80.^ "Welcome - The Institution of Structural Engineers". Istructe.org. Retrieved 2012-12-02. 81.^ Professors of Paranoia? - Faculty - The Chronicle of Higher Education 82.^ Walch, Tad (2006). "Controversy dogs Y.'s Jones". Utah news. Deseret News Publishing Company. Retrieved 2006-09-09. 83.^ Brent Blanchard (February 2002). "A History of Explosive Demolition in America". Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Explosives and Blasting Technique. International Society of Explosives Engineers. pp. 27-44. ISSN 0732-619X. 84.^ Blanchard, Brent. "A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE COLLAPSE OF WTC TOWERS 1, 2 & 7 FROM AN EXPLOSIVES AND CONVENTIONAL DEMOLITION INDUSTRY VIEWPOINT". implosionworld.com. August 8, 2006 85.^ Thomas, Dave. "The 9/11 Truth Movement: The Top Conspiracy Theory, a Decade Later". Skeptical Inquirer. July/August 2011. Pages 34-40 86.^ a b Mol, Phil. "eSkeptic >> Monday, September 11th, 2006". Skeptic. Retrieved 2009-09-19. 87.^ a b Knight, Peter (2008). "Outrageous Conspiracy Theories: Popular and Official Responses to 9/11 in Germany and the United States". New German Critique 35 (1). Retrieved September 19, 2009. 88.^ "American Thinker: A Conspiracy of Ignorance". Retrieved 2009-09-19. 89.^ "The Top September 11 Conspiracy Theories". america.gov. 2009-05-05. Retrieved 2009-09-22. 90.^ Abel, Jennifer (Jan. 29, 2008). "Theories of 9/11". Hartford Advocate. Archived from the original on April 30, 2008. Retrieved November 5, 2010. 91.^ Newspapers, McClatchy (August 22, 2008). "World Trade Centre building seven not destroyed by explosives, says US study". The Guardian (London). Retrieved 2009-04-24. External links

9/11 Explosive evidence - Experts Speak Out

fdal — Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:10:48 -0400

9/11 Explosive evidence - Experts Speak Out 9/11 Truth movement From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Supporters of the 9/11 Truth movement at an anti-war demonstration in Los Angeles, October 2007 Adherents of the 9/11 Truth movement dispute the accepted explanation of the September 11 attacks of 2001, that al-Qaeda terrorists hijacked four airliners and intentionally crashed two into the World Trade Center buildings and one into the Pentagon, with another unintentionally crashing in a field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania. They suggest this explanation contains significant inconsistencies which suggest, at the least, a cover-up, and at most, complicity by insiders. They analyze evidence from the attacks, discuss different theories about how the attacks happened and call for a new investigation into the attacks. Some of the organizations assert that there is evidence that individuals within the United States government may have been either responsible for or knowingly complicit in the September 11 attacks. Motives suggested by the movement include the use of the attacks as a pretext to start wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and to create opportunities to curtail civil liberties. Contents 1 Characteristics 1.1 Name 1.2 Adherents 1.3 Views 1.4 Communication 2 History 2.1 9/11 Commission Report reaction 2.2 NIST Report reaction 2.3 Opponents 3 Organizations 3.1 Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth 3.2 9/11 Truth 3.3 Scholars for 9/11 Truth 3.4 Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice 3.5 9/11 Citizens Watch 3.6 9/11 Commission Campaign 3.7 Hispanic Victims Group 3.8 Conferences 4 Internal critiques 5 Media 5.1 Books 5.2 Films 5.2.1 Details 6 See also 7 References 8 External links 8.1 Media coverage 9 Book Characteristics Name Truth movement sticker "9/11 Truth movement" is the collective name of loosely affiliated organizations and individuals that question whether the United States government, agencies of the United States or individuals within such agencies were either responsible for or purposefully complicit in the September 11 attacks. The term is also being used by the adherents of the movement. Adherents also call themselves "9/11 Truthers", "9/11 skeptics" or "truth activists", while generally rejecting the term "conspiracy theorists". Adherents This section may contain original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research may be removed. (June 2012) Adherents of the 9/11 Truth movement come from diverse social backgrounds. The movement draws adherents from people of diverse political beliefs including liberals, conservatives, and libertarians. Lev Grossman of Time magazine has stated that support for the 9/11 Truth movement is not a "fringe phenomenon", but "a mainstream political reality." However, others, such as Ben Smith of Politico and the Minneapolis Star Tribune have stated that the movement has been "relegated to the fringe". The Washington Post editorial staff went further describing the movement as "lunatic fringe." Mark Fenster, a University of Florida law professor and author of the book Conspiracy Theories: Secrecy and Power in American Culture, says that "the amount of organisation" of the movement is significantly stronger than the organization of the movement related to doubts about the official account of the assassination of former United States President John F. Kennedy, though this is likely the result of new media technologies, such as online social networks, blogs, etc. The 9/11 Truth movement is active in the United States as well as in other countries. In 2004, John Buchanan ran for president on a 9/11 Truth platform. Jeff Boss ran in the 2012 US presidential election on a 9/11 Truth platform. A 2010 study by Scott Summers examined the political affiliations of Facebook users involved with one 9/11 Truth group known as "We Are Change" and found that most members of this particular group are males in their late 20s. He also found most WAC members were involved in right-wing politics, which Summers suggests is an indication that left-wing adherence to 9/11 conspiracy theories has declined due to the election of Barack Obama. In a 2011 article in Skeptical Inquirer, Bartlett and Miller do an overview and analyze the members of the 9/11 Truth movement community. The authors find that the people involved in this movement, which seemingly is a disparate group with very diversified backgrounds, could be classified into three groups. They join the movement for different reasons, loosely self-assemble to fill different roles and are united by their shared mistrust in experts and the establishment (government and reputable sources of knowledge), and conspiratorial stance. Through their engagement, they each find their own fulfillment and satisfaction. Together, they contribute to the persistence, resilience and exaggerated claims of acceptance (in general public) of the movement. These three groups are: Hardcore: The organizers and active members of the various 9/11 truth movement organizations. They produce the information, spot the anomalies and technical inconsistencies, provide the technical base and form the theories. While they claim to be only interested in facts and to use scientific method, they commit the logical fallacy of confirmation bias by pre-determining the outcome, then searching for corroborating evidence while ignoring the vast body of peer-reviewed, independent, consensual research which contradict their theories. They supply the physical structure of the movement by organizing events, seminars, discussions, marches and distributing flyers and pamphlets. Their numbers are relatively small but they are tight-knit and highly connected. Their worldview favors "super-conspiracy", a master plan that is behind conspiracies which they believe they are uncovering. Critically turned: They are the young students and political activists whose affiliation with the 9/11 truth movement often is rooted from their dissatisfaction and anger at the established political and social order. Their sense of justice and idealism propels them to activism against perceived oppression and social injustice. Their penchant to use the Internet, especially social media and tech savvy make them the propaganda machine for the movement. They produce YouTube video and films with cool, countercultural content, make good use of pop culture parody and eye-catching graphics. The countercultural street credibility of their productions buy them broad appeal and exposure to millions of people. Illiterati: They are the movement's mass membership backbone, a large, diffuse group which give the movement exaggerated claims of popularity and influence. Participation in the 9/11 truth movement, to this group of people, is as much a social and recreational pursuit as the quest for truth. Their partaking is mostly through web 2.0 social networking and hits on the YouTube video. Their commentaries often are emotional and they make no pretense to be accurate, balanced or to show genuine intent to find truth. Involvement with the movement that fit their worldview gives them a sense of identity and belonging, which they find more appealing than the facts and evidences of the 9/11 terrorist attack itself. Views Main article: 9/11 conspiracy theories Many adherents of the 9/11 Truth movement suspect that United States government insiders played a part in the attacks, or may have known the attacks were imminent, and did nothing to alert others or stop them. Some within the movement who argue that insiders within the United States government were directly responsible for the September 11 attacks often allege that the attacks were planned and executed in order to provide the U.S. with a pretext for going to war in the Middle East, and, by extension, as a means of consolidating and extending the power of the Bush Administration. According to these allegations, this would have given the Bush administration the justification for more widespread abuses of civil liberties and to invade Afghanistan and Iraq to ensure future supplies of oil. In some cases, even in the mainstream media, hawks in the White House, especially former Vice President Dick Cheney, and members of the Project for the New American Century, a neoconservative think tank, have been accused of involvement in or awareness of the alleged plot. Many adherents of the 9/11 Truth movement allege that the buildings of the World Trade Center were destroyed by controlled demolition, a theory of major importance for the 9/11 Truth movement. Communication The Internet plays a large role both in the communication between adherents and between local groups of the 9/11 Truth movement and in the dissemination of the views of the movement to the public at large. Colorado Public Television has aired several films produced by the movement such as "9/11 Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out," a documentary produced by Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth, which was temporarily one of the "most shared" and "most watched" programs on the national PBS site. The station's airing of such films has been a source of controversy for the affiliate and PBS. History In the years after the September 11 attacks, different interpretations of the events that questioned the account given by the U.S. government were published. Among others, Michael Ruppert and Canadian journalist Barrie Zwicker, published criticisms or pointed out purported anomalies of the accepted account of the attacks. French author Jean-Charles Brisard and German authors Mathias Br"ockers and Andreas von B"ulow published books critical of media reporting and advancing the controlled demolition thesis of the destruction of the World Trade Center towers. A 9/11 Truth movement protest sign, October 2009 In September 2002, the first "Bush Did It!" rallies and marches were held in San Francisco and Oakland, California organized by The All People's Coalition. In October 2004, the organization 9/11 Truth released a statement, signed by nearly 200 people, including many relatives of people who perished on September 11, 2001, that calls for an investigation into the attacks. It also asserted that unanswered questions would suggest that people within the administration of President George W. Bush may have deliberately allowed the attacks to happen. Actor Edward Asner, former presidential candidate Ralph Nader, former congresswoman Cynthia McKinney, former assistant secretary of housing Catherine Austin Fitts, author Richard Heinberg, Enver Masud, founder of The Wisdom Fund, professors Richard Falk of the University of California, Mark Crispin Miller of New York University, Douglas Sturm of Bucknell University, Burns H. Weston of the University of Iowa College of Law and others signed the statement. In 2009, Van Jones, a former advisor to President Obama, said he hadn't fully reviewed the statement before he signed and that the petition did not reflect his views "now or ever." In 2006, Steven E. Jones, who became a leading academic voice of the demolition theory, published the paper "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?". He was placed on paid leave by Brigham Young University following what they described as Jones's "increasingly speculative and accusatory" statements in September, 2006, pending a review of his statements and research. Six weeks later, Jones retired from the university. In the same year, 61 legislators in the U.S. State of Wisconsin signed a petition calling for the dismissal of a University of Wisconsin lecturer Kevin Barrett, after he joined the group Scholars for 9/11 Truth. Citing academic freedom, the university provost declined to take action against Barrett. Several organizations of family members of people who have died in the attacks are calling for an independent investigation into the attacks. In 2009, a group of people, including 9/11 Truth movement activist Lorie Van Auken and others who have lost friends or relatives in the attack, appealed to the City of New York to investigate the disaster. The organization New York City Coalition for Accountability Now collected signatures to require the New York City Council to place the creation of an investigating commission on the November 2009 election ballot. The group collected more than enough signatures to put the proposal before the voters, but Supreme Court Justice Edward Lehner ruled that the petition overstepped what is allowable by city law, and ruled that, despite wording in the petition to allow for elements ruled invalid to be stricken, it would not be allowed to appear on the ballot. 9/11 Commission Report reaction To the consternation of the families and adherents of the 9/11 Truth movement, many of the questions that the 9/11 Family Steering Committee put to the 9/11 Commission, chaired by former New Jersey Governor Thomas Kean, were not asked in either the hearings nor in the Commission Report. Lorie Van Auken, one of the Jersey Girls, estimates that only 30% of their questions were answered in the final 9/11 Commission Report, published July 22, 2004. The 9/11 Family Steering Committee produced a website summarizing the questions they had raised to the Commission, indicating which they believe had been answered satisfactorily, which they believe had been addressed but not answered satisfactorily, and which they believe had been generally ignored in or omitted from the Report. In addition, the 339-page book The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions by David Ray Griffin, claimed that the report had either omitted information or distorted the truth, providing 115 alleged examples. He has characterized the 9/11 Commission Report as "a 571-page lie". On May 26, 2008 adjunct religious studies professor Blair Gadsby began a protest and a hunger strike outside the offices of Senator and Republican Party nominee for President John McCain's office requesting McCain meet with the principal scientists and leaders of the 9/11 Truth movement, specifically Richard Gage, Steven Jones, and David Ray Griffin. McCain had written the foreword to the book Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand Up to the Facts, published by the magazine Popular Mechanics. Arizona Republican State Senator Karen Johnson joined the protest in support. On June 10 Johnson with Gadsby as her guest and other 9/11 Truth movement members in the audience spoke before the Arizona State Senate espousing the controlled demolition theory and supporting a reopening of the 9/11 investigation. In response to a question, McCain said he did not meet Gadsby, adding: "Because I don't take well to threats." NIST Report reaction An iron-rich sphere, found in the dust of the World Trade Center, as documented by the United States Geological Survey and RJ LeeGroup, Inc. RJ Lee's report states the spheres are indicative of molten iron. Members of the 9/11 Truth movement claim the spheres indicate the presence of temperatures much hotter than office fires, or the presence of thermitic reactions. However, such spheres have been found to form when iron particles are affected by normal fuel fires. Following the initial government investigation, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Report (May 2002) NIST Report, numerous responses were written by members of the 9/11 Truth movement. Many of these responses claimed that it ignored key evidence suggesting an explosive demolition, "distorted reality" by using deceptive language and diagrams, and attacked straw man arguments, such as the 2005 article by Jim Hoffman entitled, Building a better mirage: NIST's 3-year $20,000,000 Cover Up of the Crime of the Century. In the fall of 2005, Steven Jones, then a professor at Brigham Young University, announced a paper criticizing the NIST Report and describing his hypothesis that the WTC towers had been intentionally demolished by explosives. This paper garnered some mainstream media attention, including an appearance by Jones on MSNBC. This was the first such programming on a major cable news station. Jones was criticized by his university for making his claims public before vetting them through the approved peer review process. He was placed on paid leave and has since retired. He continues to remain a focus of public interest for his 9/11 research. Accordingly, in April 2007, some 9/11 victims' family members and some members of the new Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice submitted an additional request for correction to NIST, containing their own views on the defects in the report. NIST responded to this request in September 2007 supporting their original conclusions; the originators of the request wrote back to them in October 2007, asking them to reconsider their response. Opponents Matt Taibbi of Rolling Stone assessed that the movement "gives supporters of Bush an excuse to dismiss critics of this administration" and expressed concerns about the number of people who believe in 9/11 conspiracy theories. Massachusetts Institute of Technology engineering professor Thomas W. Eagar was at first unwilling to acknowledge the concerns of the movement, saying "if (the argument) gets too mainstream, I'll engage in the debate." In response to Steven E. Jones publishing a hypothesis that the World Trade Center was destroyed by controlled demolition, Eagar said that adherents of the 9/11 Truth movement would use the reverse scientific method to arrive at their conclusions, as they "determine what happened, throw out all the data that doesn't fit their conclusion, and then hail their findings as the only possible conclusion. Calling conspiracy theorists "the truthers", Bill Moyers has quoted journalist Robert Parry "...threw out all the evidence of al-Qaeda's involvement, from contemporaneous calls from hijack victims on the planes to confessions from al-Qaeda leaders both in and out of captivity that they had indeed done it. Then, recycling some of the right's sophistry techniques, such as using long lists of supposed evidence to overcome the lack of any real evidence, the "truthers" cherry-picked a few supposed "anomalies" to build an "inside-job" story line". Al Qaeda has sharply criticized Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, over his suggestions that the U.S. government was behind the Sept. 11 attacks, dismissing his comments as "ridiculous." Organizations Since the publication of the official reports, a number of interconnected 9/11 Truth movement organizations have been formed. Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth Two people holding a banner of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth See also: Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth is an organization of architectural and engineering professionals who support the World Trade Center controlled demolition conspiracy theory and are calling for a new investigation into the destruction of the Twin Towers and WTC 7. The group is collecting signatures for a petition to the United States Congress that demands "a truly independent investigation with subpoena power" of the September 11 attacks, which, according to the organization, should include an inquiry into the possible use of explosives in the destruction of the World Trade Center buildings. Richard Gage, a San Francisco Bay area based architect, founded Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth in 2006. Investigations by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) have concluded that the buildings collapsed as a result of the impacts of the planes and of the fires that resulted from them. Gage criticized the government agency NIST for not having investigated the complete sequence of the collapse of the World Trade Center towers and claims that "the official explanation of the total destruction of the World Trade Center skyscrapers has explicitly failed to address the massive evidence for explosive demolition." To support its position, the group Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth points to the "free fall" pace of the collapse of the buildings, the "lateral ejection of steel", and to the "mid-air pulverization of concrete", among other things. 9/11 Truth 9/11 Truth was launched in June 2004 and has become a central portal for many 9/11 Truth movement organizations. It is run by Janice Matthews (Executive Director), David Kubiak (International Campaign Advisor) and Mike Berger (Media Coordinator), among others, and its advisory board includes Steven E. Jones, Barrie Zwicker and Faiz Khan. The organization co-sponsored opinion polls conducted by the U.S. market research and opinion polling firm Zogby International that have shown substantial numbers of people believing the government did not tell the full truth about the September 11 attacks. Of the people surveyed, those in lower education and income brackets were more likely to express disbelief in government accounts, rather than those in higher income/education brackets. Scholars for 9/11 Truth The original Scholars for 9/11 Truth, founded by James H. Fetzer and Steven Jones on December 15, 2005, was a group of individuals of varying backgrounds and expertise who rejected the mainstream media and government account of the September 11 attacks. Initially the group invited many ideas and hypotheses to be considered, however, leading members soon came to feel that the inclusion of some theories advocated by Fetzer-such as the use of directed energy weapons or small nuclear bombs to destroy the Twin Towers-were insufficiently supported by evidence and were exposing the group to ridicule. By December 2006, Jones and several others set up a new scholars group titled Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice, whose focus was in the use of the scientific method in analysis. The original members took a vote on which group to join and the majority voted to move to the new group. By 2007, James Fetzer had been openly rejected by the 9/11 Truth movement, banned from and criticized on popular forums and no longer invited to public 9/11 events. Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice (STJ) formed in January 2007 and is a self-described "group of scholars and supporters endeavoring to address the unanswered questions of the September 11, 2001 attack through scientific research and public education". The group is composed of more than 900 members, including Richard Gage, Steven E. Jones, Jim Hoffman, David Ray Griffin, Peter Phillips, former Congressman Daniel Hamburg, and Kevin Ryan. Most members support the conspiracy theory that the World Trade Center Towers and the third skyscraper, WTC 7, were destroyed through explosive demolition. In 2008 and 2009, several Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice members published essays in science and engineering journals. In April 2008, a letter by members Steven E. Jones, Frank Legge, Kevin Ryan, Anthony Szamboti and James Gourley, was published in The Open Civil Engineering Journal In July 2008, an article by Ryan, Gourley and Jones was published in the Environmentalist. In October 2008, a comment by STJ member James R. Gourley describing what he considers fundamental errors in a Bazant and Verdure paper was included in an issue of the Journal of Engineering Mechanics. And in April 2009, Danish chemist and STJ member Niels H. Harrit, of the University of Copenhagen, and eight other authors, some also STJ members, published a paper in The Open Chemical Physics Journal, titled, 'Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe'. The paper-which caused the editor and only peer-reviewer, Professor Pileni, to resign, stating that this was published without her knowledge, thus adding to the numerous times that this dubiously "peer-reviewed" journal was accused of not peer-reviewing its publications. -concludes that chips consisting of unreacted and partially reacted nano-thermite ('super-thermite') appear to be present in samples of the dust. 9/11 Citizens Watch Main article: 9/11 Citizens Watch The group was formed in 2002 by John Judge and Kyle Hence and, along with the Family Steering Committee, played an active role in calling for the establishment of the 9/11 Commission, and monitoring the commission closely. William Rodriguez at American Scholars Symposium: 9/11 and the NeoCon Agenda in Los Angeles, California, June 24-25, 2006 9/11 Commission Campaign Founded in 2011 by Senator Mike Gravel, the 9/11 Commission Campaign's objective is to enact subpoena-capable, state-level commissions through state ballot initiatives, namely in Oregon, Alaska and California. These commissions are envisioned as citizen-driven, independent organizations that would form a semi-unified grassroots national presence by exercising joint powers authority. Hispanic Victims Group The Hispanic Victims Group is a group created after the 9/11 attacks, founded by William Rodriguez, an adherent of the 9/11 Truth movement. The group was one of the key forces behind the creation of the 9/11 Commission. William Rodriguez, as founder of the group, was a member of the Families Advisory Council for the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation. Conferences Members of the 9/11 truth organizations, such as 911truth.org and Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice, regularly hold meetings and conferences to discuss ongoing research about 9/11 and to strategize about how best to achieve their goals. Many of these conferences are organized by 911truth.org, and some have been covered by the international media. Internal critiques Within the movement, there are alternative theories about what may have happened. There have been a number of articles and responses written by members critiquing the methods and theories of other members in the Journal of 9/11 Studies. Sites such as 911 Research and 911 Review typically include essays or pages analyzing claims in the movement which are erroneous, have little basis in evidence, or which appear to misinform readers. While Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice states that they advocate the use of the scientific method and civil research activities over public debate, Jim Fetzer's group, Scholars for 9/11 Truth, "has emphasized that science can only proceed by considering a full range of alternative hypotheses", and held a conference which invited the public to "review the most hotly debated 9/11 theories and evidence". The range of hypotheses considered at the conference held by Fetzer's group was described in a Madison Times article, which stated: "Saturday focused on many of the more popular theories, beginning with inconsistencies at the site of the Pentagon crash and moving on to a controlled demolition of the towers. By Sunday the conference had covered weather control, weapons from space, and the idea that the planes that struck the towers never existed at all." Media Books A prominent author of the 9/11 Truth movement literature is theologian David Ray Griffin. His two books, The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11 (March 2004), which claimed to outline a methodical, deductive framework for researching 9/11, and The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions (October 2004), became best-sellers. His Debunking 9/11 Debunking (May 2007) looks at the way magazines such as Popular Mechanics have sought to debunk the alternative 9/11 theories. His 2008 book, The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the cover-up, and the expos'e, was written to update his original book, The New Pearl Harbor, reflecting information and insights from five major developments that have occurred since his original publication, while The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Final Official Report About 9/11 Is Unscientific and False, published in 2009, examines the credibility of the official investigations into and hypotheses about the destruction of the third skyscraper, WTC 7, focusing on the final official report published in November 2008. In September 2004, the interactive "Complete 9/11 Timeline" website by Paul Thompson, which is a collection of mainstream media reports presented chronologically, was made into the book The Terror Timeline. Films Films made by people associated with the 9/11 Truth movement include: The Great Conspiracy: The 9/11 News Special You Never Saw (2004) by Barrie Zwicker Martial Law 9/11: Rise of the Police State (2005) by Alex Jones 9/11: Press for Truth (2006) 911 Mysteries: Demolitions (2006) 9/11: Blueprint for Truth (2007) and updated 2008 Edition by Richard Gage Loose Change: An American Coup (2009) by Dylan Avery New World Order (2009) by Luke Meyer and Andrew Neel Details These documentaries present a range of alternative theories about how the attacks might have been carried out. 9/11 Press for Truth (2006) documents the struggle by the Jersey Widows to open a full investigation of the events, and their frustration while monitoring the 9/11 Commission as part of the Family Steering Committee. Alex Jones, 9/11 and New World Order conspiracy theorists are the subject of the documentary film New World Order directed by Luke Meyer and Andrew Neel that debuted on the Independent Film Channel on May 26, 2009. The documentary, while not endorsing the movement, is described as giving the movement "more sympathetic, or less critical, airing than they've yet had (except among the converted)".

Atlanta Nuclear Destruction Prophecies

Nuclear Fire — Tue, 05 Mar 2013 15:51:54 -0500

Atlanta Nuclear Destruction Prophecies Babylon will suddenly fall and be broken. Wail over her! Get balm for her pain; perhaps she can be healed. "We would have healed Babylon, but she cannot be healed; let us leave her and each go to our own land, for her judgment reaches to the skies, it rises as high as the heavens. The Lord has vindicated us; come, let us tell in Zion what the Lord our God has done." Jeremiah 51:8-10 The Sword Is Coming to Atlanta http://www.ubm1.org/?page=SwordComingToAtlanta (Please see Catastrophe Delayed Momentarily in 2005 ) (Note from Dave: I have received two dreams from people; one lived South of Atlanta and one northeast, in which they were receiving refugees into their home. We certainly will have to be ready wherever we live to help out and be a witness.) April Fields' Dream Ron and I lived in a very large house but still there was a limited number of bedrooms. We had invited a number of friends and family to come spend the weekend with us. The bedrooms filled up quickly but then a late arrival - a couple who brought 16 more people with them - made it necessary for me to rearrange to accommodate them all. I recall that the people were families with different ages of children and none of them spoke English. And as I was sorting out where people would sleep I realized I would have to feed these people, too. I awoke while making a shopping list for food. Ron and April live outside of Atlanta. The Dream by Sam Cathey A month ago, Dale Cathey's oldest son Sam told him that he had a dream. Immediately prior to him telling this, Jeanne Beech quoted Gen. 41:32 -- that the doubling of a dream meant it is fixed, and that it will come to pass shortly. Sam said that in his dream he and his dad were coming up out of a subway and when they came up everything in Atlanta had been destroyed -- not a building remained. Dale and Sam didn't know about the above article . Jeanne lives 150 miles from Atlanta and has been shown she will have refugees in her home. Tony and Vicky Hinton We live in Georgia about 40 miles below Atlanta. My husband had a dream about 2 years ago about bombs hitting Atlanta. There is a brother in downtown Atlanta that ministers on the streets and also takes food and supplies mostly to poor mothers with children who have no income. But they feed whoever they can. As he has been ministering on the streets, about a year ago he felt in the spirit a strong darkness come over the city. Now Atlanta has always been in darkness, but this was a darkness like none he had ever felt. He and some of the brothers had noticed that some of the homeless people were disappearing. They have no home and no money, so they wondered why so many of them were gone all of a sudden and no one on the street knew what happened to them. This began to increase greatly. About 6 months ago, maybe a little longer, he and the brothers took food to some poor families in a trailer park. There were a lot of poor families living in the park. As they continued to take food to them every week, they noticed that there were a lot of foreign men moving into the park. Every week they increased. They were Middle Eastern men who were posing as Mexicans. Most of them just would not speak at all, but the ones who did were speaking to the brothers in Spanish and said they were Mexican. Since there has been a great influx of Mexicans in the area some of the brothers had learned some Spanish over the years. One brother who could speak Spanish well said that his Spanish was better than their Spanish. It is obvious that they are not Mexican, but middle eastern. The brothers went to the authorities but nothing has been done. They said there was nothing they could do ???? Well, several months ago, one of the brothers started feeling in his spirit to move out of the Atlanta area. He felt that his work was about over there. He felt to search for a place in the Tennessee area. He and his wife even went there, and had decided to move. Then his wife started changing her mind and started backing out of moving. So this brother became concerned because he felt he was hearing this from the Lord. So last week he began to fast and seek the Lord on this issue. Three days into the fast, early in the morning around 4 am, he was awakened. He looked up and there was a light in the room next to the wall at the other end of his room. Then suddenly an angel stepped out of the light, like he just stepped through the wall. As he stepped from the light into the room, he called the brother by name as he was pulling a sword from its sheath. The brother said he could hear the metal scraping as he pulled it from the sheath. He raised the sword. He then said, calling him by name, that "The Lord God" had put it into his heart to move from this place, and he was to take his family and move, because "The Lord God" was bringing the sword to this city. He also said that he "must leave soon." He repeated these instructions twice. Then he stepped backed into the light and disappeared. This brother has never had a visitation like this before. He told his wife. She said that God would have to show her. Please pray for this family and all of us who are in the area. I believe this might go with the word coming forth about multiple areas being hit before the year is out. (Note from Jeanne Beech: I do not recall where this came from, but this week I read that this man has been instructed to leave by July.) (Note from Dave: The invasion over the borders is preparing America for the fall. The Minutemen are trying to close the door after the fox is in the coupe. I hope the brother will obey whether his wife will or not. He should remember Lot and his wife.) Update from Tony and Vicky 6-4-05 Another brother in the Atlanta area has had an angel visit. The angel instructed him to leave the Atlanta area . After the visit he prayed and fasted for further instructions. As he was praying, he heard the Lord in an audible voice say that he was to leave Atlanta and he was to be gone by July. He gave no other details. Whether something is happening in July was not confirmed, only that he had to be gone by then. He was not told why either. So he is moving in blind faith and obedience. We live 40 miles below Atlanta and as of yet have had no instructions. We are waiting on the Lord, but have no fear nor sense no danger to us personally. This must be something that will affect downtown Atlanta, as all these brothers living in the heart of Atlanta. My son who has gone away from the Lord as he has left home lives right in the heart of Atlanta, also. Please agree with us for his protection as he has a calling that he has turned away from at the present. The Lord be merciful to his own. Attack on Atlanta? James Jones I woke up from a very disturbing dream at 6:40 am on 9-10-05. I felt prompted to put it down on paper. I live in Atlanta, Georgia, but I am not sure that this dream is only for Atlanta. In the dream, after bringing everything into the garage at night, I went into my house and shut the two garage doors. (Our current house only has only one garage door.) I then went to bed. In the middle of the night I heard a disaster alarm siren going off outside in the distance so I got up to look outside through a bedroom window. I looked for a while but at first I did not see anything. Then all of a sudden I sensed that all the air in my room was being sucked outward away from me. I immediately knew something was wrong and called out to my family that they needed to evacuate to the basement of our house immediately. They were all asleep but heard my warning when I yelled out with urgency. I first heard my mother call out, "How long before we have to get into the basement, do we have two hours time?" My reply was stern: "You better be down in the basement in two minutes ." (Based on my understanding that one day equals one thousand years in God's time, then two minutes could equal 83 days which would land on approximately Dec. 2, 2005; but I'm not sure and don't have any divine revelation on how long two minutes God time equivocates to our time.) When running down into the basement I passed by the door to the garage and I saw my brother who was standing in the doorway. He asked me if I should put the doors to the garage down. I knew something was wrong because the doors were suppose to be down, so I went out to the garage to look. When I got into the garage both doors were somehow up. At this time I was able to see outside into the distance much better but I noticed the disaster alarms had stopped ringing. When I stood outside my garage I saw about 5-10 miles off in the distance a large black twirling cloud. At first I thought it was a cloud from a nuclear explosion but I looked at it carefully and it had the look of a nuclear explosion as well as the look of an F4 or F5 tornado tearing up everything. It seemed like it was both. The dream then ended. I knew the doors being up had a specific meaning and believe we have but a little time to evacuate before the storm comes upon us. I have known that the judgment storms will be coming upon our nation and I have always planned on emergency preparations to try to ride it out. It might be wise to rethink this mindset and get out while we still have a small window of time. The mathematical configuration I could determine was using the one day God time = 1000 years earth time. (Note from David: A brother calculated if "a thousand years is as one day," two minutes would be 511 days, or approx. 17 months. That could be approx. 17 months after 9-10-05, which would be about mid-March of 2007. Being in the basement before two minutes could indicate abiding in the secret place of Jesus before judgment falls.) Amos Skaggs said: G-d said He would postpone the destruction on America one more time to show His mercy to the believer because they prayed for this country. BUT HE WILL NOT DO IT AGAIN. I saw this Aug. 3, 2005 and recorded it also. Catastrophe Delayed Momentarily (See also Nuke Found in Arizona ) Robin Schenck - 11-30-05 6:57 AM (David's notes in red) In a dream I found myself, my two older brothers and many, many other people at a large concert hall. We were seated in a row not far from the front of the auditorium, maybe about 10 rows back from the stage. My eldest brother S--- was seated between my next oldest brother D---- and I. I was seated on the end of the row at the outside aisle or maybe there was one seat more to my left. The concert was about to begin. The concert began. There was also a man who I'd gone to high school with. He was in my oldest brother's class, so he was two years older than I. I had a major crush on this guy in high school. Now we were all grown up and at this concert together. As we sat there talking and preparing to see this concert my father who was outside the concert hall, unseen , sent in a message to my oldest brother to come out there - he wanted to talk to him. S--- (oldest brother) went out and came back with the message that father had said that he was not going to start the judgment just yet, the bad thing that he was about to do to the world, and that he did not want us to memorize or say/pray something just yet, lest we hinder something he wanted to do or prevent. Since Jesus was the first born of many brethren He is our oldest Brother who brings the message of the "Father." Everything is already orchestrated and our parts are completely planned out like a concert but the time is delayed. This same thing happened to me three months before the end of 1998. God told me the judgment of America in 2000 would be delayed. But He said I was not to tell anyone, except our local congregation after a bit, so that the message of repentance and fear of the Lord would get out. Then three months before 2000 He said to tell them. Notice this dream was on 11-30 (or 11:30) just 30 minutes before midnight, which has been known as a time of judgment as with the Clock of atomic scientists. 6:57 is only 3 minutes before 7:00. 7 represents spiritual completeness. The concert began and my brothers were both up on stage and also sitting next to me - strange. I was also supposed to be one of the musicians, but my cousin Y----- was up on stage with my brothers and playing a very bad cello solo segment of the piece of music they were performing. I kind of laughed at the sour notes she was playing and looked around at others, but I was proud of her anyway . (The Lord is proud of the young who as disciples offer their immature service to him.) My brother S--- and I switched seats when he came back with the message, so I did not have to get up again to let him sit in the middle, and he sat down and relayed the message to the other two of us. Father said he was going to wait a little while on the catastrophe he had just about begun, because of some intervention by prayers or requests of some kind. I asked my brother if father wanted us to leave the hall or what. My brother seemed to indicate that we were just to wait there for another signal, don't leave just yet, just wait. He sat down again with us. (We are just to stand down and wait for the resumption.) I was greatly agitated and knew that though the delay was spoken by father as the result of the intervention of believers' prayers and such, that the delay would be extremely short , that Father was not stopping the catastrophic event. Later in this dream, I found myself at some other place where my physical fitness was being tested. I was on an exercise mat on the floor and I was doing sit-ups. I had to do at least 30 or 50 to prove good fitness. I began to do the sit-ups and was doing rather well. No one was holding my feet at all and I was just easily performing those sit-ups. I felt like I could go quite a long time and that 50 of them would not be a problem at all. I also noted that I was working to maintain just the right angle to maximize the effect on the abdominal muscles, so as not to cheat - I wanted to FEEL the muscles working properly. We are to spiritually exercise ourselves unto Godliness to get prepared for this judgment while waiting. ********************************** The dream/prophecy below has been on our site for months here before the Greek named storms of 2005. It says that after these storms there would be a delay after which the explosions would happen. No one thought we would ever see Greek named storms but we just passed Epsilon, a new world record that one day will be broken. Chaos and Woe Messianic Pastor Caleb Kinley Shabbat Shalom! May YHWH truly bless you this Shabbat and may He wrap His arms of love around you and embrace each of you into His glory. I have included a dream I had several times about a week or so ago. I'm not a prophet, and this is only a dream, but usually, at least parts (if not all) of some of my dreams do come true. For example, two weeks before Sept. 11th I did dream of the exact events, verified by my mother and my wife. About three days before the December 26 tsunami, I dreamed the tsunami would happen, and it came true, verified by my mother, my wife, and my congregational members as I shared the tsunami dream with my congregation. Again, I am not a prophet and I pray this does not alter anyone's opinion of me... :-) I'm too afraid to not share this dream and can only hope and pray this one does not transpire...anyway... These were terrifying to me, to say the least. The dream began with a loud voice saying, "Thus saith Elohim, the wicked has witnessed 'chaos' and still they refuse to repent. 'Chaos times Chaos times Chaos.' They ignore my call and refuse to gather under my wings. 'Chaos time Chaos times Chaos.' They are busy bodies with idle hands, putty for evil, and they send a rancid stench to my nostrils. O miserable wretches they have become. They worship the sun and everything that is under the sun, but Me. They worship man, but not Me. They worship lust, but not Me. They worship envy and covetousness, but not Me. They worship power, money and fame, but not Me. They worship science and nature, but not Me. They bow down to pleasure for a season, and I will cut them off from among my people. Therefore, 'Chaos times Chaos times Chaos' will be their just reward. "Watch and see O servant, watch and see the meaning of 'Chaos times chaos times chaos.' O servant, take and eat of this parchment, and your tears will be for visions and your tongue shall prophesy forth My words. Few will hear you speak of My words, and fewer will come forth and share the mantle of My blessings. Many will not believe and will continue in their sin, and make great hate of you and the rest of My servants. The infidels will despise my people and bear false witness to try and remove the virtue from My bride. But the light of your menorah will not burn out. Thus saith Elohim YHWH." (There was more that I just cannot remember right yet). I was then lifted up above the high mountains by a breeze of wind and the wind was like an invisible floor so that I was able to stand in the sky and see the earth through the wind like it had a glass floor. There were great movements of water in the oceans/seas (hurricanes?) bearing Greek names that caused more flooding and wreaked more devastation. The came a pause , and I'm not sure if the days of the pause represent days, months or years. But once the quiet pause was completed, there was four or five great lights coming from the ground that turned the mountains into dust and rubble. Some like Chuck Youngbrandt have said that the Lord has, through concerted prayer, knocked this 4 or 5 explosions down to 1 or 2 in the U.S. But that does not mean that there will not be more in Iran or even Israel. This is what I suspect. The flesh of people from miles away dissolved and all that was left from those who perished were their skeletons, clean down to the bones. They had no eyes and their eye sockets were clean as if someone used bleach to clean out a white plate. Many who survived were maimed, amputees, and as they wept, bright green tears mixed with blood melted away the parts of their face made wet by their tears with a fizzing sound like Alka-seltzer. They had no eyelids as their eyelids dissolved because of their tears, and their eyes swelled up until they looked bug-eyed. It was then that the skeletons of the dead came alive and hunted the living and killed whoever they caught (i.e. pandemic-disease?). And then the earth opened in many places, swallowing up many of those who survived the bright lights, and the oceans and seas grew large, sending waves and storms, too many to count. The dead of many floated on the water and included women, children, babies, animals, men, and cities once hidden from water were now covered in water. And the rivers and the oceans and the seas cried because they were polluted by rotten flesh and blood. I could hear the cries of thousands of people and the cries made my ears have sharp pains so that I had to put my fingers in my ears. And many of the living blasphemed YHWH and searched for His people to place blame on us. They said "let us find the bride and eat their flesh, for it will taste sweet like honey." Then I saw great famine, such as has never been. Rich nations were now begging for bread and were happy to pay much money for rotten bread covered with worms. And many began drinking unclean water from rivers and oceans and seas that were still full of dead human flesh. And some would drain the blood of their children and roast their child over an open fire, and then feast upon their children, drinking their blood while eating their flesh, and being merry. And disease stood tall, and caused many more to perish. ************************************** Amos Skaggs said: G-d said He would postpone the destruction on America one more time to show His mercy to the believer because they prayed for this country. BUT HE WILL NOT DO IT AGAIN. I saw this Aug. 3, 2005 and recorded it also. Will the next great judgment on the U.S. be delayed? Will the Next Great Judgment on the U.S. Be Delayed? "PROPHETIC MESSAGE to the USA CHURCH" By Sadhu Sundar Selvaraj (prophet from India). Delivered to the church in St. Louis, June 2002. Don't you believe any of the false prophets who preached to you after 9/11 saying it was not a judgment of God.... Two days before 9/11 happened a dear friend of mine, a very saintly prophet of God, was taken up in the spirit to Heaven. And while he stood before the presence of the Almighty God, the Lord Jesus Christ called forth for a mighty, powerful angel. He came and stood before the Lord Jesus Christ. And a fiery torch was given to this angel. As soon as the angel held the torch, he became enflamed (engulfed) with fire from the crown of his head to the sole of his feet. And then the command was given to the angel, GO FORTH! And cast this fire down upon the nations of the world. And the angel and this prophet came down, and they stood in the mid-heavens. And the angel told him, now see what happens. And the angel took the fiery torch in his hand and cast down fires in several parts of the earth. And when the fires were thrown, the angel told him, "From now onward, there will be bombings, fires and destructions in many, many nations around the world." That (vision) was (given to this prophet) on the seventh of September (of 2001). On the eighth of September, when he was conducting a fasting and prayer meeting in his church, the same angel came and stood by his side again, and repeated into his ear, audibly, word for word, every event that he saw the previous day. And the angel commanded him, "Now, declare to your church everything that you saw and heard." And with great fear and trembling, he shared what he saw and what he heard. And they all prayed. Several days later came the judgment upon America. It was not an ordinary terrorist attack. If you read in the Old Testament, the five books of Moses, every time Israel would go away, go astray from the commandments and laws of God, the Bible says very clearly, God will turn her enemies against her. The hornets and the wild beasts will be let loose to come and create havoc in the land of Israel among the Israelites. If God can do that to the chosen nation, the chosen people, how much more YOU? God removed his protective cover, removed his protective hand, because you constantly turned your back against the Almighty God. I was supposed to speak with you about the crucified life, as I mentioned last night. But today, as I was here during the worship service, an angel of the Lord came and stood before me, and he told me to do something else. That is what is happening right now. Exodus 34:5 onwards..."And the Lord passed by before Him and proclaimed, The Lord, the Lord God, merciful and gracious, longsuffering and abundant in goodness and truth. Keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin. And that will by no means clear the guilty, visiting the iniquities of the fathers upon the children, and upon the children's children, to the third and to the fourth generation." Please observe the last part in verse seven, "visiting the iniquities of the fathers upon the children and upon the children's children unto the third and fourth generation. I came well prepared to continue preaching on the crucified life. But as we were deeply worshiping the Lord, I saw the chief prince angel over the nation of the United States of America. He came and stood before me. I first began seeing chief prince angels of nations when I went to South Africa. That was the first time that I ever saw a chief prince angel that is in charge of overlooking the affairs of an entire nation. And he gave me a word concerning the nation, concerning the will of God, and what God's purpose is for the nation. From then onwards, for the many, many nations that I would go to, the respective angels of those nations would come to me and give me a word for the nation: what is God's word, what does God think about the nation, what has been happening in the nation, in the churches, and what is going to come to pass. So when the angel of the United States of America came and stood before me, I tremble and quake every time I see an angel of a nation, I always tremble and quake in my heart, because of the awesome anointing and authority they have. When he came and stood before me, he told me, "An awesome judgment is going to come upon America very soon. An awesome judgment." When he spoke, I felt a fear, a Godly fear running through my bones and my spirit. This is not a judgment that would destroy the entire nation, but something quite similar to what happened with the twin towers. But, it can all be prevented, IF RIVERS OF INTERCESSION flow in the nation. This is the word that he told me to speak. And I saw that if you will take this seriously and pray a huge river will flow throughout the center of your country. As the angel was speaking I saw this huge white river flowing from the east to the west. If it flows as a river of tears and intercession; only that would prevent this judgment that could come. And then I saw this angel where he was positioned and where he was standing guard over the United States of America. He was standing very near to where the Statue of Liberty is. A huge, gigantic angel! In Revelation chapter ten, it is written that John saw an angel so huge and mighty that one of his legs was on the earth, the other leg was on the sea and he stretched out his hand and he reached to the sun. Can you imagine what a gigantic figure he must have been? Probably as tall as the Sears tower or the former World Trade Center. Such a huge, gigantic angel standing guard over the United States of America! My dearly beloved brothers and sisters, as he was speaking these words, he said "this is the word that you should preach tonight." And then I saw the heavens open, and from the throne of God, this word came to me: "Visiting the iniquities of the fathers upon the children, and upon the children's children unto the third and to the fourth generation." The judgments of God. Don't you believe any of the false prophets who preach to you after 9/11 saying that it was not a judgment of God. I tell you as a non-American and as a holy prophet of God, what happened was a judgment from God.... You know, when I first came to America, in 1991, on the fourth of July, your Independence Day, I was in a conference scheduled to speak. As I was worshiping the Lord, I saw the heavens open before me, and the Lord Jesus Christ stood there, and He told me, "Now I am going to give you a word for this nation." Among the three things that He showed me, they all have come to pass, but I will tell you one thing that concerns you right now: I saw the flag of America. You know, I have never seen a people like the Americans, who love their nation so much, and who are so patriotic about their great nation. That is good. When I traveled in your country, I used to see these huge, gigantic flags that fly so majestically in some parts of the country. I feel very proud, as if I myself was an American. The same American flag, I saw in the heavens. But instead of flying in the right direction, it was flying in the reverse direction. And the Lord Jesus Christ was standing at the flag and knocking on the flag. And as He was knocking, I saw the words, LAST CALL flashing. Last Call was flashing and flashing. Then the word of the Lord came unto me, "This nation-the flag that you see flying in the reverse direction is the heart of this nation that has turned away from righteousness, and is walking toward unrighteousness. She has turned her back towards Me. Yet, I am still calling her. Last call, last call, last call. And for the three months that I was in the U.S. during that period, every church and every conference that I went to, I was commanded to share this vision. And ask the American people to pray for your country. But you know, I was very aghast to notice that the Americans, especially American Christians, take very lightly such words, because you think that the non-Christian Americans deserve God's judgment. You really don't love your country. You think you love your country, but deep down in your heart, you don't really love your country. You have such a self-righteous attitude, thinking that the non-Christians deserve the judgment of God, and you deserve Heaven. Don't you think that when the twin towers came down, many Christians also perished? When the economy of New York City came to a standstill, how many Christians also suffered economic losses, job layoffs. Thirty-thousand Indians working in New York City were sent back home. Overnight, 30,000 Indians lost their jobs. They came back home, among them, many Christians. They wrote to me for prayer. When the judgment of God comes, remember: even the righteous may have to suffer. When God's judgments came upon Israel, and she was taken captive to Babylon, righteous Daniel was among them! He was a captive. When Israel was under the captivity of another foreign nation, righteous Jeremiah was there! Righteous Nehemiah was there. The righteous saints also go into the captivity! Don't you forget that. Don't forget that. You have been duped by all the false teachers and false prophets in your country, deluding you and deceiving you into thinking that no matter what happens, you will always be protected. As a result, you are suffering from spiritual lethargy, hearing only that which you want to hear and switching off when you don't want to hear. You know, of you it is written in the Bible, "those who have itching ears, only wanting to hear pleasant words." My dear brothers and sisters, the judgments of God are real. The countdown has begun. You know, India and Pakistan came this close to an all-out nuclear war. If the war took place, the whole of Pakistan would have been wiped out. Four northern states in India would have been wiped out. And the defense analysts predicted that Pakistan would have been uninhabitable for thirty years because of the nuclear dust that would be hanging over the country. The whole of north India would have been wiped out. Nepal would be wiped out. Tibet would be affected. They came this close to an all-out nuclear war. Somehow, God spared us. My dear brothers and sisters, if you read the Holy Bible, forget about church doctrines, forget about vain traditions and teachings of men who only want to bilk you out of your money. I am declaring to you the oracles of God right now. From Genesis to Revelation, if you read the Holy Bible, it shows very clearly two things: redemptive judgment. God judges! Because He is a good God. From the garden of Eden all the way up to the book of Revelation, you will see these two themes: love and judgment. Not just love and love, and bless me and bless me. This is how your prophets and teachers are teaching you today. And they have not only corrupted the American church, they are corrupting the Indian church. They are corrupting the Eastern church, they're corrupting the African church and they're corrupting the European church. It (unbalanced teaching) has been exported!... Many people teach, If you are once saved, you are forever saved. That is a teaching from the pit of hell. Once saved is not forever saved. (Technically, I do believe that, but not practically.) Not from the viewpoint of God, because it is written in Matthew 24:13, "He that endures until the end, only HE shall be saved." Enduring until the end! Lot's wife did not endure until the end. As she was on the road to redemption, she left behind her heart in Sodom and Gomorrah. Her heart pulled her back. And she turned and she saw, SAVED but then suddenly DESTROYED! Don't be deceived! I tell you one more time with great love and all humility, don't be deceived that once saved is always saved. Don't be deceived that just because you are a tongue-talking Christian that you will be saved and caught up in the rapture. Don't be deceived. He that endures until the end, only he shall be saved. Look at the story of Nineveh. Jonah went there, preaching. It took three days to walk around the whole city. For three days, he was crying out, "REPENT! If not, then in forty days you will be destroyed!" From the king to the animals, they all fasted for forty days. They repented in sackcloth. God's heart was moved with compassion. Judgment was delayed, but Nineveh was eventually destroyed because she only repented for a season, like you (America). After 9/11, the whole nation appeared holy and repentant for a season. Now you are back to normal. You are back to your filth. You are back to your corruption, you are back to your sins. You have forgotten the repentance you did after 9/11. The vows you have made unto the living God after 9/11, you have forgotten! The altars that you had repaired after 9/11, you have forgotten! And they are back in ruins again! The Scriptures say, "My Spirit shall not strive with man forever." My spirit shall not strive with man forever. Now come with me to the New Testament, in Luke, chapter nineteen. The Lord Jesus Christ looks at the city of Jerusalem, His beloved city, His own city, He has no other city except Jerusalem. He looked at the city, and He beat His face and He cried, and cried and cried. No one had ever seen the Lord Jesus crying like that before. This was even before He cried at Lazarus's tomb. He was beating His face, beating his breast and crying bitterly. Why? Because the very people for whom He came, as the very personification of redemption, they were going to reject the Messiah. And what would result from that rejection? Judgment. The Lord Jesus predicted, "Oh Jerusalem, you are going to be destroyed! They are going to siege you around! You are going to be utterly destroyed! Your city will be burned, you will become ashes!" He cried, like a mother crying for her baby. Thirty-three and a half years after the Lord Jesus Christ was crucified, Jerusalem was burned to ashes. Not one time, but three times, the city was burned to ashes. My dear brothers and sisters, did she repent? America is good. A good nation, a giving nation, a helpful nation. And at the same time, a prideful, arrogant nation. She thinks that she has become great by the power and strength of her own might. She has forgotten that it is the Lord God that has lifted you up, blessed you, made you strong and mighty, but you have forgotten your creator. Look at the Book of Revelation, chapter two and three, the seven messages to the seven churches that were existing at the time. None of them, except the church in Smyrna, received a (good) word from the Lord Jesus Christ. The rest of the six churches were receiving conditional judgment. If they repented, it would be well and good. If not, the Lord said (to one particular church), "I will remove your candlestick and you will be destroyed." I was once preaching in a charismatic church in Singapore. The pastor invited me to his house for Christmas Day dinner. Together with me were his two church elders. After dinner, before I left, he said, please bless our family before you leave. I stood to pray for his family. And the Lord Jesus Christ came and stood beside me and said, "For three years, I have been coming to his church and looking for fruits, and none are bearing. Right now, I am going to cut this tree." Then I fell on my knees, and I interceded for the church. For twenty-five minutes, I cried to the Lord. "No Lord, please don't. Please don't. Spare them Lord for one more year. The Lord Jesus heard my prayer and He said, "Because you asked, I will spare them for one more year." After the prayer, I called the pastor privately and I told him this word (from the Lord). And I totally forgot about this entire event. But, 365 days later, exactly to the day, the Lord Jesus Christ appeared to me and He said, "The one year is up." I totally forgot about it. He came and reminded me. "The one year is up. And during that one year, she did not bear any fruit. NOW, the reapers will go and will cut the tree." From the moment the Lord Jesus spoke that word, I saw the tree of this church withering day by day, by day. Today, it does not exist. Even the pastor is no more the pastor of the church. The church totally closed up. This is just one example that I have told you. I could tell you examples of many other churches where the Lord came and removed the candlestick from the other churches. (Another) church with whom I had a very close affiliation, it's like I was a mother giving birth to the church (I gave birth to the church). But the very mother who gave birth to the church, -the very mother-, had to use a dagger to stab her, like Abraham did. One day when I was in their church, the Lord Jesus appeared to me and He said, "I am going to remove their candlestick." When I told this to the pastor, he laughed at me. He said, "Brother, we are in the New Testament. We are under grace. How would God ever do like (what you have just said)?" I looked at him and I said, "If I am a true prophet of God, and if that word truly came from God, it will come to pass." And I shook off the dust off my feet that day, and I never went back to that church again. But one year later, the candlestick was removed from the church. And that church is no more in existence. My dear brothers and sisters, don't take your salvation for granted. Don't take your freedom for granted. Don't take the mercy of God for granted. Don't take the redemptive grace of God for granted. Several years ago, I was preaching at a conference in Sydney, Australia. You know the city of Sydney is exactly like the city of San Francisco. The very sins in San Francisco are the very sins in Sydney. The very sins that you see in New York City are the very sins in Perth. Two identical cities, on the east and west coast in your nation are the same (in these spiritual respects) cities in Australia, east and west coast. They are always gateway cities. While I was there, one evening an awesome angel came and stood before me. I am usually never fearful in the midst of angels, except when I started seeing the chief princes of nations. But that particular angel, when he stood before me, I trembled and quaked like a leaf. And he had like a bowl in his hand. And he looked at me with a fierce look in his eyes, and he said, "I am one of the two angels that was sent out to spy Sodom and Gomorrah. And I have been sent here to spy out the city and pour this vial of judgment upon the city." Only then I understood why I was trembling. With fear, I fell on my face before God. I prayed and prayed for the city of Sydney. I said, "Lord, not now. There is still three more days for the conference, Lord. I will gather all the Christians to repent for Sydney, to pray for this nation." For a long time I was lying on my face. Finally, the countenance on the angel's face changed. He became calmer, and he said, "I am leaving now for a season." And he left. That night I went to the conference. Seven hundred people had come, and I shared with them what I saw. All the 700 people fell down on their faces before God. For forty-five minutes-there was no message that evening-for forty-five minutes, they were all crying, beating their faces, beating their breasts, and beating the floors. The whole auditorium was reverberating and echoing with their tears and with their cries. Everyone from the oldest to the youngest were on their faces before God. My dear brothers and sisters, I tell you one more truth today. As the chief prince angel of the United States of America stood before me, he said, Like the angels that went out to spy out Sodom and Gomorrah, a host of angels are walking the length and breadth of your country, spying out the land in a similar manner to how the two angels did (at Sodom)." I tell you, when the white missionaries go to the East and to Africa to preach, we hear the gospel. We turn away from our millions of gods of wood and stone, and we turn back to worship the true and living God. But the gods we give up, you are now embracing, and you are bowing down and worshiping them. So who is the greater heathen, tell me? The nations in the East? No way! Because we are turning back to the righteous God. And the supposedly Christian nation is becoming a heathen nation where you have all kinds of abomination. You know, none of the Muslim nations in the Middle East will allow (except for Bahrain, Kuwait and United Arab Emirates, except for these three countries) -- the rest of the countries would never allow a Christian church in their nation. The largest Muslim mosque outside the Middle East is in the United Kingdom. In fact, the headquarters for their European operation and American operation is in the United Kingdom, a supposedly Christian nation. And the churches in the U.K. open their doors to allow the Muslims to come in and use their very premises for the propagation of Islam. Would they (Muslim countries) do that? They will not even allow you (to practice openly in their country). They consider Christians infidels. They will not even allow us into their churches. They will not allow us to build churches in their nations. Whereas, we, in the name of the First Amendment, -- you know, your very freedom has become your curse. The very First Amendment that you use to promote 'freedom of speech' has become your very curse. That's what the gays are now using. The First Amendment. We (the gays, in this case) have the right to speak what we want, and you (the church) cannot disagree with us. Your freedom, your liberty, has become your curse. My dear brothers and sisters, unless you weep for your nation, great judgment is going to come. Unless rivers of intercession flow in your nation, unless tears of repentance flow from your eyes, flow from your churches and water this nation, judgments have been pronounced. You know, there is a certain group of angelic beings called the Watchers. We only read about them in one book of the Bible. The book of Daniel, chapter four, verses 13 and 23. This specific group of angelic beings are in charge of executing and overseeing the plans of God and judgments of God over each nation. At their command, they can execute judgment. I was in the nation of Indonesia in 1998, just after the fall of a dictator that ruled that nation for thirty-two years. On the first day that I was in that nation, the chief prince angel over Indonesia entered into my room, and he said, "Whatever has happened in this nation has been decreed and ordered by the watchers in Heaven. They decreed and they said, let there be a change." And overnight, the dictator of thirty-two years was overthrown. Overnight-it did not happen over a long period of time. Overnight, he was overthrown-decreed by the Watchers. The same decree has been passed. However, -- you know, when a person is sentenced to death, he can have one last final appeal to the president. Do you have this in your country? We have this (law) there. It is called the "President's pardon". If the President chooses to pardon, the person sentenced to die can (have their sentence reduced) to life in prison. You (America) are in that stage (or situation) right now, and your only appeal is to the Heavenly Father. The final pardon is in His hands. If not (if the church in America does not give enough intercession and weeping), 9/11 was just a sample. It will be repeated and repeated. My dear brothers and sisters, God loves you. If he did not love you, an angel would not have come to give that word. Let me tell you today how God works. If He wants to execute a judgment, He will just carry it out without informing His prophets. He would do that. Why does He tell His prophets? Amos 3:7-8- "God will not do anything before He tells His prophets." Why? So that they will pray. God wanted to destroy Sodom and Gomorrah, but why tell Abraham beforehand? So that he would intercede and pray for the salvation of Lot. He (Lot) was under the same curse. He (God) could have just destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah. Why inform Abraham first? Even today, God follows this same principle. Why is God informing you? So that you can be saved. So that you will repent. So that you will cry out to God. So that His entire pronouncement can be overturned, and mercy can come upon your nation. You know, it is not so much God's wrath, but the hardness of your hearts, the hardness and sins in your hearts that must be changed, and the nation will turn back from unrighteousness to righteousness. You have an awesome call upon your nation. You know, the symbol of your nation, a flying eagle, was not chosen by your forefathers by accident. An eagle is a Heavenly bird. It's supposed to be up there in the heavenlies with God, not down on the ground like a vulture, eating flesh. But you, the mighty eagle, have now become an ugly, flesh-eating vulture. The church is no better. The standards of the world have crept into the church. Are you pure? What is the difference between you and the world? You are called to be separate. You are called to be peculiar. What is so peculiar about you if your lifestyle is exactly the same as the world? What is so peculiar? Why then should non-believing Americans get saved? Why? When the church is stinking, why should they get saved? That is the reason why many are embracing Islam. They are embracing Buddhism. Did you know, let me tell you truth, Buddhism is the fastest growing religion in North America. Not Christianity, which is decreasing in size. The church in Europe is decreasing in size. Islam is the fastest growing religion in Europe. What's happening to you? The church is growing in the East. The church is growing in Africa. But you are shrinking. Why? Because (your lack of loyalty or fidelity to the teachings of Christ) stinks. Tell me now in all honesty. Do you think that you deserve the grace of God? You don't. Do you honestly believe, as you see your own condition better than I do, do you honestly think that you deserve the mercy of God? No. Yet, God is good God. His mercy endures forever. (The passage in Scripture states), "The Lord, God is good, merciful, forgiving, merciful to a thousand generations." In the many names of God that are mentioned in Scripture, three times it talks about His goodness. Only one time it says that He will judge, which means His goodness is three times greater than His judgment. My dearly beloved American brothers and sisters, the Lord Jesus Christ loves you very much. But He cannot accept a corrupted church. He loves you. If not, this meeting would not have been held. He loves you very much. But He cannot accept a compromising church. He loves you, but He cannot accept deceiving teachers, and lying prophets. But the wheat and tares have been allowed to grow at the same time. He has allowed it, patiently waiting, hoping against all hope that you will repent. Every little judgment that He sends to you, hoping against all hope that you will repent. But you are not. You know, I fear that your fate will be as exactly what happened to Jerusalem. The Lord Jesus said, "Prophets after prophets were sent to you, Jerusalem. Instead of embracing them, you stoned them to death. And (as) the final prophet, I am coming. You have not known the hour of your visitation, oh Jerusalem. And now, therefore, the hour is coming when you will be sieged all around, and you will be desolate." What would you like to choose? Let's all bow our head for a word of prayer. What will you choose? Will you cause a river of intercession to flow in your nation? Will you cause a river of intercession to flow in your nation? Or are you going to just sit here and let this word run down your back like water on a duck's back? Can God count on you? Can all the hosts of Heaven count on you that you will intercede? That you will weep like Jeremiah? Can He count on you? If you are willing, get up from your seats right now, and fall down on your face before God. And lift up your heart and cry for your nation now! Lift up your hearts and cry for your nation now! Lift up your heart and cry for your nation. Oh, America, oh beautiful America, won't you repent? Tear you heart! Tear your heart! And cry for your country! I am not asking you to cry for India! Cry for your own nation! Tear your heart. Cry out to Him for His mercy! Tell Him, "We have sinned Lord! We have sinned, Lord. We have turned our backs against you, God!" Cry out to Him. Cry out to Him now! Let the rivers of intercession flow now Oh you daughters of America, let your tears flow now, let your tears flow. Cast away your good-for-nothing pride! Cast away your pride. Your military might is nothing before God. Cast away your arrogance. Cast away your sexual sin! Cry, cry, takes (America's) sins onto your shoulders, and cry now. Let your tears flow like rivers now. Let your tears flow like rivers. The children in the East are repenting and turning back to righteousness. Oh My children in America, will you be destroyed? Will you perish, while they who are sitting in darkness are turning back to righteousness and light? Oh ye, that were of light and sitting in the light, why have you embraced darkness? Why have you allowed your understanding to be darkened? Why have your beauties turned into corruption? Cry out to Him. Cry out to Him now. The Spirit of Christ is telling me now; the only way that righteousness can spring up in this nation is if the church will turn back to righteousness. And she will weep and sow righteousness into the land. Oh you daughters of America, don't just mechanically pray. Don't just pray because I asked you to pray. Tear your heart! Tear you inner heart! And turn back to God with weeping, with fasting, with repentance. Turn back to God! (Spirit of grace and spirit of supplication, come and abide in us!) : The angel over the United States of America is still standing here. And he showed me that all your intercession (just offered) is just a drop in the bucket that he has in his hand. And the word of the Lord that has just come to me is this, "If My people who are called by My name will humble themselves, seek My face and pray, and turn back from their wicked ways, I will hear their prayers, I will forgive their sins and I will heal their land." Lift up your hands to God, America.

Miami Nuclear Destruction Prophecies

True Prophet — Mon, 04 Mar 2013 19:09:26 -0500

Miami Nuclear Destruction Prophecies Prophetic Words of Judgment Against Miami and Florida Given through Brian Charles "Flee this place, city of My wrath!" --Miami "You MUST flee this place, city of sin." "You MUST go!" --Miami "It will all be blasted apart by My hand!" --Miami-Dade County "Flee this place, city of sin." "Blasted apart in an instant! It MUST go." --downtown Miami "Monuments of pride-blasted away!" --downtown Miami "It'll be blasted away in a day." "Blasted to pieces!" --Miami "It'll all be blasted away." --Miami, Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach "All this will be gone in a flash!" --Fort Lauderdale "All this will be blasted away by the fire of My wrath!" downtown Fort Lauderdale "It'll all be gone!" "It'll be sheer terror!" "It's the End Times!" "The bombs are already in place." "All this will be history." "It'll be pure terror!" "It'll be nuclear destruction!" "All this must be history. It will happen suddenly." "It all must go! " "It's the end of the Age!" "Someday these'll be gone." --downtown hotels "They'll be reduced." --the amount of wealthy people in Miami "Your enemies are plotting an attack against you. From the sea." "There is NOTHING hidden from Me!" "Let Me nuke 'em! I can't use them. They are a pain to Me." --the Jewish people in Miami "You see these towers? They'll all come down in an instant!" --Miami Beach "All this will be gone in an instant!" --South Beach "City of sin." --South Beach, Miami "Drowned in water." "They are (evil). That's why I'M going to sink it under the ocean. They are (evil). That's why I'M going to sink it under the ocean." "I'M going to destroy them." --the evil people of FL This'll all be a thing of the past." --restaurants, nightlife "It'll all be swept away." "It'll all be swept away by a mighty tidal wave." --Miami Beach, South Beach "I want to nuke it with the fire of My wrath!" "I want to blast it with the fire of My wrath!" "You'll see it gone." "All these buildings will be blasted away." -Miami-Dade County "You see these buildings? They'll be rubble!" "It will all be destroyed in an instant!" --South Beach "I want to blast it with the fire of My wrath!" "It's sin has come before Me." --South Beach, Miami "I will save who I will save." "These piers will be gone, submerged under the sea." "All submerged under the sea." --North Palm Beach "Get out of here-it'll be gone in a second!" "You shall go." --West Palm Beach "I want to destroy this town. That's what I'll do. It'll be gone in a nuclear flash!" --Miami-Dade County "All this will be burned by fire of My hand." --Miami, Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Dade County "I want to blast this place suddenly. Few will survive." --Miami "All this will be submerged under the sea. All its pomp will be gone. Only a handful will survive." "All this will be submerged under the sea." --Miami, Coral Gables "It'll all be submerged underwater." --Miami "Someday it'll be submerged underwater." --the Everglades "Peninsular Florida will be gone, submerged by My wrath!" "Peninsular Florida will be gone!-by My wrath!" "Peninsular Florida will disappear." "It will all be submerged by My hand!" "Peninsular Florida will be submerged under the ocean." "Someday it'll be underwater." "It will all be submerged by My hand." --Florida "Submerged underwater-the whole of Florida." "The islands will be covered by water." "It's all going down." Southern Florida "Leave it all behind. They won't serve Me." "I shall judge this place." "I'M gonna destroy it all!" "Great shall be the destruction of this town. They won't serve Me." --Gainesville "I'M going to destroy this place." --Gainesville "All this will be blasted away!" --Hollywood, Florida "Sunk by My hand." --Manatee Memorial Hospital "All this will be submerged under the sea." --Bradenton "You know I'M gonna plunge this under the sea? My people won't serve Me." --Bradenton "You know all this will be submerged under the sea? My people won't serve Me." --Sarasota "I'M gonna destroy it!" Florida State Capitol "They shall be judged." --Florida State Government officials, leaders "Leave! I hate this place. A nest of fools. They shall be punished, for failing to uphold right. They shall be destroyed. You shall see-a mighty destruction upon the capitol." "They refuse to obey Me." "I'll destroy this place with sudden force. They won't serve Me." --Tallahassee City gov't, FL State gov't "I'M gonna destroy it!" --the phallic-shaped tower in downtown Tampa "I'M gonna destroy 'em all!" --downtown Tampa towers "I want to destroy this place. That's what I'M gonna do-with a nuclear blast suddenly. Great shall be her destruction. Because My people refuse to serve Me." --Tampa "You see, all this will be blasted away!" --downtown Tampa "Gone by thermonuclear blast!" "City of My anger." --Tampa "I've been merciful long enough." "They won't repent." "I must destroy." "...of destruction. You will see My hand. You will see." --word of God's judgment against Tampa "I want to submerge this place!" --St. Petersburg, Florida "Someday this will all be submerged by My hand!" --St. Petersburg "Soon those buildings will be submerged." --downtown St. Petersburg, all of Florida "Some of those cities will be blown up by nuclear explosions." --Florida cities "Do not glory in nuclear destruction." "I'M gonna suddenly destroy this Empire!" "I wanna destroy it. That's what I'll do." "It'll be nuked off the Earth!" --Jacksonville "I want to destroy this place." "I've been merciful long enough." "All buildings of downtown...blasted by nuclear fire!" --Jacksonville "I'M gonna destroy this place. You shall see." --Tallahassee "Blasted away by nuclear fire!" --AT&T Tower, downtown Jacksonville "I'm gonna dry up the state." "It'll be desert." --Florida "All this will be dried up. Drought will envelop the land. My people refuse to serve Me." --Florida "I'll dry up the farmland. Farms will be a thing of the past." "It'll dry up." --Florida farmland "I'll dry it up, and all of Florida!" --Lake Okeechobee "I shall drain it dry." --Lake Okeechobee "I'll judge for that!" --the Brazilian partying lifestyle "It'll be sunk under the sea!" --coastal Brazil "I'M gonna destroy 'em all!" --towers of the world "These'll be a rarity." --flowers "It's a place of Satan. They don't serve Me." --Hillel Jewish Center "I'll tear it down!" --the Sunshine Skyway Bridge, I-275 "They'll be gone too!" "Gone in an instant!" --yachts, cruise liners "Someday it'll be a thing of the past." --The U.S. Navy "It's all going under." --the U.S. economy "I will destroy them all!" -- God's people- the Christians and the Jews "They serve Baal, not Me!" --God's people, the Christians and the Jewish people "They'll be destroyed, by false spirits." --Christians who reject the Holy Ghost-filled life "I'll definitely judge for that!" --the Bride of Christ, abandoning the Lord for the world, turning Herself into the Whore of Babylon "I'll surely judge for that!" --Christians who stay behind to accumulate finances, never fulfilling God's will to go out West "I'M going to judge My people because of that!" --refusing to obey God "I'll judge for that! "I'll definitely judge for that!" --God's people chasing after the almighty dollar "I'll judge for that!" --God's people being after money and worldly stuff "I'll judge for that!" --Christians who won't give it all up to follow Christ "I'll judge for that." --Christians loving the world "I'M afraid that's true." --God's people want their "fire insurance" covered, yet still stay in the world "A lot of ministry is not of Me." "I give you children." --young, immature pastors "Weep for the misery." "That's gonna happen to this country." --years of famine "I'M gonna suddenly destroy this country!" "I'm going to destroy your Empire." "I'll judge for that." --peoples' excuses "I'll judge for that." --people rejecting Truth for learning "I'll judge for that!" --the vanity of womens' hairstyles "I'll judge for that!" --women who get careers, not husbands "I'll judge for that!" --the world working on Sundays "I'll judge for that!" --the world being a very busy place "I'll judge for that." --no affordable housing "I'll judge for that." "I'll surely judge for that!" --doctors overcharging patients for medical care "I'll judge for that." "I'll definitely judge for that!" --cities full of money-hungry people all racing around "I'll definitely judge for that!" --women who wait to marry the "highest bidder" "I made 'em that way." --the insolence of young girls "I will definitely judge for that! You can count on it!" --people who refuse to take a stand for what is right because of what it will cost them "I'll definitely punish for that!" --the people of the world not being interested in the Gospel "I can do anything for you." "I can take you anywhere." "I will keep you safe from the Father's wrath." "I'll be as hard on you as you are on others." "I'll be with you!" --when the rules of society changes overnight "I'll be with you as the world ends." --says Jesus "You MUST publish that!" "You MUST tell." "You MUST warn people!" You MUST warn!" "Warn My people of their nuclear destruction." --says Jesus VISION: Nuclear Destruction of Miami Stephen L. Bening July 24, 1992 On the afternoon, at about 2 P.M. on July 24, 1992, I was walking out of the front door of the home where I was staying on Golden Beach, in North Miami, Florida. As I walked out the front door, and walked west, toward me car, I was startled by a flash in the Southern sky. I turned to look South. From where I was standing, I had a relatively unobstructed look at the Southern Sky. As I watched, I saw a Hydrogen Bomb mushroom cloud rise to the South. I began to panic. I thought about the light I saw and the cloud and estimated it's distance at about 40 miles. That meant to me that Homestead Air Force base had just been nuked. I was thinking that if it had been hit by a Russian SS18 missile, which has a blast radius of 100 miles, that the shock wave must be going to reach me in 30 or 40 seconds. At any rate, that was my estimate. I began to look around the yard, seeing if there was any culvert or drainage ditch that I could jump into to get underground. I found nothing. I resolved to just stand there and praise my God until the blast hit. Just as I began to thank the Lord, the mushroom cloud dematerialized in the sky as I was looking at it: it just faded away. It was at this time that I realized that I had not seen a real atomic blast, but I had seen a vision. On month later, on August 24, 1992, Homestead was hit with a direct hit by Hurricane Andrew and the destruction was compared to that which would be caused by an Atomic Blast. Sometime later though, the Lord spoke to me and told me that I was to expect another, later fulfillment of my vision. It is to be fulfilled as I saw it transpire in my vision. Stephen L. Bening Prophetic Warning: Miami Nuclear Attack Given through Tiffany DeVillier I have felt led all week to share some dreams and a Word the Lord gave me nearly 20 years ago. I would like to share them now. I have never felt released to release these dreams/visions and this Word until now. I sense strongly that what you are about to read is soon coming to pass. Mississippi, 1988: During this time I was living in Bay St. Louis, MS. There is a bridge that crosses the Bay of St. Louis. The Bay drains out into the Gulf of Mexico. In this particular dream I was driving across this bridge. People were in the streets partying. I heard the words, "As in the days of Noah, so shall the coming of the Son of man be." Then I was standing in the middle of this bridge looking out over the Gulf of Mexico in the direction of Florida. I was watching the sky with a sense of expectancy. The sky grew dark. A thick cloud had covered the region and darkness had overtaken the earth. Suddenly I saw an orange-red mushroom cloud rise from the direction of Florida and this cloud began to spread outward. People began to panic. Chaos was all around. Those who had once been partying, were now fleeing for their lives, some becoming suicidal driving their cars into the waters. Those without cars were jumping off the bridge though they were not in immediate danger. Boca Raton, FL, 1989: During this time I was actually living in Del Ray Beach, Florida. In a dream I heard an announcement as over a loudspeaker. We were under a nuclear watch. Shortly afterwards sirens began to sound. An announcement came again. This time we were under a nuclear warning. I immediately dropped everything I had and began to run to the bank, along with everyone else. Just as I got to the bank, I noticed a mushroom cloud was rising from the other side of the building and the top of the cloud began to spread out across the sky. I immediately turned to run in the opposite direction when suddenly I dropped to the ground. My lungs felt like they were on fire and it was so real. My lungs were literally on fire as if I was actually there. Next, I was driving through the streets. People were strewn all over the place, some even dead. It had the look of a war zone. Flee Miami Bro. Kirk Willow, Alaska Greetings, in Jesus' name. The last time I wrote to God's people on Sept. 12, 2004 my wife Martha was six (6) months pregnant. Today, almost a year later, Sept. 5, 2005, she is now in her eighteenth (18th) month of pregnancy. It is a miracle. It is a sign. The Lord spoke to me in the fall of 2003 and said, "The child is a sign of destruction, before the child is born there shall be destruction in America." This has been fulfilled as New Orleans, Mississippi, and Florida testify. We shall all perish, except we repent. God has resigned himself to destroy this nation, He has turned his back to forsake it. Only destruction and misery lie ahead. Back in the fall of 2004 God spoke to me that he was giving me three (3) signs. The first sign was the child; the sign would be destruction before the birth. The second sign was that Florida would be ravished by the end of September 2004. The third sign was that Miami, Florida would be struck by a brutal blow from the hand of God. It would be overwhelming. Chaos, sorrow, devastation, death, destruction. He had me prophesy against the city. The first two signs have been fulfilled. Florida was ravished by hurricanes by the end of Sept. 2004. My wife is still with child today and destruction in America has happened in the form of Hurricane Katrina. New Orleans is gone. Mississippi destroyed. Soon Miami, Florida will be devastated. God has commanded me to warn all his people, Leave Miami, Florida! Flee out of Miami! New Orleans is your example that God will make waste an entire city. Oh people of God, hear the word of the Lord. Oh, Miami, Miami, Hear the word of the Lord. I will cut off old and young. I will cut off man and woman. Your streets shall be full Of chaos and destruction. Your pomp shall cease, Your haughtiness shall be brought low. And I the Lord Shall be exalted in judgment. And ye shall know that I the Lord God, have brought this Judgment against thee. A servant of the Lord Bro. Kirk Willow, Alaska Note from Dave: I received the above revelation on 9-22-05 from a sister who questioned the 18-month pregnancy. I was able to confirm it because just five days before in our online Unleavened Bread Bible Study, Leisa Miller shared her testimony of a trying 18-month pregnancy: 18-Month Pregnancy: A Prophetic Sign? Leisa Miller Before I begin telling this testimony of faith and of waiting upon the Lord, I would like to thank every one who prayed for me and this baby in Jesus' name. Back about a year or so now, I had asked for prayer for this baby from all my brothers and sisters in the Unleavened Bread study group. My brothers and sisters there and here have been so faithful to stand in the gap on my behalf while the Lord was teaching me to trust Him. May this glorify the Lord in us all in the days to come. Exercising Faith (Lk.1:45) "And blessed she that believed; for there shall be a fulfillment of the things which have been spoken to her from the Lord." On January 8, 2004, I was awakened by the Spirit of the LORD and was made to know that I was going to have a baby. I had wanted one, I had been longing for one for some time, but I did not go to the LORD about it, sadly. Instead, I hoped that it would happen. Impatiently I waited. I had talked to my husband but he had said that it was not a good time, that we did not have enough money. But by then I was 31 and I felt like it was now or never. I had no idea what the LORD was about to do in my life. So I awoke, I was excited and scared. My first thought was, how am I going to tell Pete. (that's my husband). I was sure the LORD had told me. I had no doubt. Two weeks went by. I had not told my husband yet, thinking that he would not believe me anyway, but I was excited. Soon came the time for my cycle to begin. The time came and went. Years ago, me and my sister-in-law had dreamed that we would be pregnant at the same time. One day while we were sitting together during fellowship, she asked me if there was any chance that I was pregnant. I was surprised. I thought, "How'd she know?" But then she told me that she was sure that she was pregnant. Her and my brother had decided to have faith in the LORD about a better job for him so that they could have more children and she could be a wife at home. She believed that right after they agreed that, that night they became pregnant. (Mt.18:19) "Again I say unto you, that if two of you shall agree on earth as touching anything that they shall ask, it shall be done for them of my Father who is in heaven." I told her that, as a matter of fact, the LORD had woke me to tell me that I was with child two weeks before. She was excited and so we compared dates and discovered that we got pregnant on the same day. We were in awe. Another week went by and no cycle, then another, then another. Not that I expected it, but the thought of being pregnant was still fairly new and the habit of checking for the cycle was not. One day I was at Meijers and I thought I should get a test. Then I thought, "But the LORD told me I was; what do I need a test for?" Then I thought to talk to the LORD. I said, "LORD I don't want to go to man or man's ways and act as though I don't believe You, so I need You to give me a sign, a sign that helps me stand on what You already told me. So I pray that You let my license, as I flip it down the aisle, land face up, letting me know that I am as You said I was-with baby." Now, I was fully prepared to trust the LORD in this, no matter what it said. So I flipped it-and it landed heads up. I was thrilled! I finished my shopping, all the while thinking about the baby and the LORD and what He was doing. But when I got home, some time between the flip and the arrival home, I found doubt of some sort crept into me, and I said to the LORD, "LORD, please forgive me. I don't want to ask You again but I am struggling. Please give me one more sign that confirms what You have now told me twice." (Ex. 4:8) "And it shall come to pass, if they will not believe thee, neither hearken to the voice of the first sign, that they will believe the voice of the latter sign." So I stood in the hallway of my home and flipped some coins and asked, that if it is still the same as it had appeared to me till then, let the coins flip heads up. (Pr.18:18) "The lot causeth contentions to cease, And parteth between the mighty." They all flipped heads up. (Isa.46:11) "I have spoken, I will also bring it to pass; I have purposed, I will also do it." From that point on I was convinced, though my trial had only begun! The Beginning Of The Trial Of Faith Soon my sister-in-law was looking for a midwife and she found one who believed in Christ and had been catching babies for years; it was great.. I told my husband and he was excited. Well, into my second month I again was plagued, but not by doubt about being pregnant. Now I was plagued with fears that something was wrong with the baby because of my sin of not going to the LORD for this pregnancy but relying on myself and my ways of having a new little one. (Mk.4:40) "And he said unto them, Why are ye fearful? have ye not yet faith?" I felt like I had been dishonest to Pete, like I wanted a baby more than I wanted to listen to what he had decided. (Pr.16:9) "A man's heart deviseth his way; But Jehovah directeth his steps." Although this was not me or who I was any more, it was how I was acting at the time and my conscience was convicted and in utter fear. Finally, one day just after the turning of my second month, I was pressed down with guilt and fear. (Mk.4:40) "And he said unto them, Why are ye fearful? have ye not yet faith?" I asked the LORD if something was wrong with the baby. He said, "Yes." I asked Him if it was because of the sin on me. He said, "Yes." I asked Him if I had to confess this. He said, "Yes." I asked Him if I could confess it to my mom. He said, "No." I knew He was going to say no. I wanted to ask Him if I could confess it to my sister-in-law, but I knew that He would say no to that to because I knew I needed to confess it to Pete. So I asked Him, "Must I confess this sin to Pete?" Of course, He said, "Yes." In James 5:16 the Lord says, "Confess therefore your sins one to another, and pray one for another, that ye may be healed." I was even more scared now; to say to my husband that I had not cared what he wanted was frightening to me. I was 55 minutes away from home and needed to tell him as soon as I arrived. The drive home was hard and got harder the closer I got to home, but I arrived and did not wait to begin. I knew it would take me some time to actually get it out of my mouth. By the time I got home, I felt like I could cry, but I made myself not, telling myself that I was not going to cry because it might make my husband have compassion for me because I had not been truthful and now am facing the consequences. So I said to him, "Pete, I need to tell you something." I tried for what seemed like forever to say it but I kept looking for ways to break it to him easy, but there were no easy ways to be found. So, finally, I said it. To my surprise, to my complete surprise, my husband bent over me and kissed me on the head and said, "What's done is done." Strangely, I was frustrated, quietly uneasy; I felt like I needed to suffer more for how I had been, for what I had done. The LORD was merciful through my husband that day. So after a few days, because I was new to faith and the ways of GOD, I felt like I should ask my husband to lay his hands on my belly and bless the baby because he had forgiven me. My faith I felt was not sufficient to believe that all was well, but my husband would not. He had a hard time with faith, too. So I mustered up the courage to go to the LORD and asked Him to honor my prayer prayed according to His word. (Mk.11:24) "Therefore I say unto you, All things whatsoever ye pray and ask for, believe that ye receive them, and ye shall have them." So I placed my hands on my tummy and prayed that Spirit of life and health come into this little one. (Rom.4:17) "God, who giveth life to the dead, and calleth the things that are not, as though they were." Afterward I asked the LORD to give me a sign from the Bible to stand on, that my faith would be strengthened, and I opened my Bible and this is what I put my finger on: (John 16:21) "A woman when she is in travail hath sorrow, because her hour is come: but when she is delivered of the child, she remembereth no more the anguish, for joy that a man is born into the world." (Lk.1:45) "And blessed she that believed; for there shall be a fulfillment of the things which have been spoken to her from the Lord." I was astounded and thankful and joyous and renewed. I believed again. (Heb. 11:1) "Now faith is assurance of hoped for, a conviction of things not seen." Over the next nine months, my sister-in-law and I grew in all ways the same, each with our baby inside. I enjoyed all the new and strange sensations happening in my body, and it was awesome to call up my sister and to hear how she was having them all, too. It was like we were in our own little baby world. But at the same time I went in and out of faith. Although the baby moved and I grew and my belly stretched and I gained weight, the struggle in my flesh was intense. Oftentimes, just to try somehow to escape the things in my mind, the fears, the thoughts, all the "what ifs," I would ask the Lord questions by lot. One night things were so hard, I don't remember how it started, all I know is that I couldn't fight it. I ended up asking the Lord questions I already knew the answers to, but in doubt from fear and the enemy, I could not resist. God taught me much; this night was a hard lesson. I don't quite remember well everything thought or asked, but basically this is what I do remember. I was past the laying on of my hands on my belly, I was trying to stand on the sign given to me in John 16:21, but being still very young in the Word in and in the Faith, I was just learning how to fight. I didn't yet know how to need His mercy so often. I didn't yet know how to constantly believe Him. As I began asking questions, He would answer quite faithfully, reminding me in my weakness what He had already said was done. In my doubt I asked MANY "what ifs," only to discover that He began answering me according to what I was believing. I didn't see that that is what it was-yet. Afraid and lacking faith and confused, I called my sister in the Lord, crying. Many times the Lord has helped me though those who are trusting Him when I am struggling, too. She reminded me what He had said to me before, and told me that He longs for us to believe Him, no matter what it feels like, looks like, or sounds like. She reminded me of the Scriptures that tell of a man of God who was told (1 Kings 13:9) " or so was it charged me by the word of Jehovah, saying, Thou shalt eat no bread, nor drink water, neither return by the way that thou camest." But he went back with a prophet that said (1 Kings 13:18 " n angel spake unto me by the word of Jehovah, saying, Bring him back with thee into thy house, that he may eat bread and drink water. he lied unto him." (19) So he went back with him and did eat bread in his house, and drank water." So because of his disobedience or unbelief of the Lord, he perished. A fear of our Father came over me and I repented for asking Him these questions in disbelief of Him, and He renewed my faith in His word. The Next Trial of Faith Begins At the end of my third month I began going to visit the midwife that my sister-in-law had found. So I was getting prenatals and advice from her about the baby and the pregnancy. One night, we went to the midwife's house for a Bible study, and she asked me and my sister to give our testimony about how we had been delivered from witchcraft and as the night when on I found myself giving my testimony about the little one growing within me. My flesh resisted for fear of looking silly but it had no chance against the Spirit of the LORD, who strengthened and encouraged me to tell this to the group. For this group it was a strange thing to hear and it was reflected on their faces. But I was filled with faith. (Heb.12:1) "Therefore let us also, seeing we are compassed about with so great a cloud of witnesses, lay aside every weight, and the sin which doth so easily beset us, and let us run with patience the race that is set before us." Interestingly, my midwife shared with me and Jenni a story about a woman who was living, I think, in China, and was in hiding because she was pregnant with a baby girl. She was a Christian and she asked the Lord to keep her pregnant till she could get to some place safe. Not sure where she made it to, but Chantel told us that she remained pregnant for 13 months and delivered a health baby. She said this was a miracle because after a month of being overdue, it is said that the baby will not get enough oxygen because the placenta will begin to fail. And this testimony came even before any of us could have known what the Lord was going to do. During my first prenatal, my midwife found the heartbeat of the baby briefly. But by this time I could tell that my testimony was working some doubt in her, and it was hard for both her and I to bear it, now. My sister and I left, and I went home feeling like I didn't want to go back. I just wanted to believe the LORD and not listen to the disbelief of others. In my fourth month, I went again to a prenatal, and this time she could not find the baby's heartbeat. And for a month, the way I felt when I was near her was heavy on me and working nothing good in me. (1 Pet.1:7) " hat the proof of your faith, more precious than gold that perisheth though it is proved by fire, may be found unto praise and glory and honor at the revelation of Jesus Christ." On the way home from the fourth-month visit, I talked to my sister, and she shared with me what she saw the LORD doing and I could see it. I became excited for my midwife, who was also having her faith tested and tried. I could see what was happening once again for a short time. I began talking to my midwife on the phone as friends. She shared with me how the LORD had showed her in a dream three or five years before that she was going to have three more babies, and that since that time, her and her husband had been trying without any success. I confided in her that if she would go to the LORD and believe that He would do what she asked Him to do, what, in fact, He said was already done in her dream, that He would do it. She said to me that she was afraid of going to the LORD for fear of what He would say to her, 'cause she really wanted a baby. I could tell that she wanted to believe my testimony, but also struggled. Her and her husband had been going to a fertility clinic to see if they could increase their chances of conceiving. For years, she took a medication that was supposed to make her get pregnant, but it did not. I reminded her that all good things come down from heaven and no matter how much we want something, we can't get it from nowhere but from GOD. She agreed, sounding sadly like she thought that GOD had forgotten her. Then some time passed. Another prenatal came, and this time she could not hear the heartbeat again. She was discouraged because I was convinced that the Lord would bring what He said was done. (Isa.66:9) "Shall I bring to the birth, and not cause to bring forth? saith Jehovah: shall I that cause to bring forth shut ? saith thy God." Again I went home, my flesh not wanting to return, it forgetting that GOD was in control and had good reason for all that was happening. I was blinded by it too often. I was slowly going into depression. During my fourth month, I began feeling the little one move within me so strong that often I believed that it alone was keeping me from doubting altogether that I was pregnant. I was faithful in the fear of the Lord at my prenatals. (Ps.111:10) "The fear of Jehovah is the beginning of wisdom." My midwife would use her baby heart finder and I was determined to only speak and agree with the LORD, knowing that I stand before Him and not before man. (Jer.17:5) "Thus saith Jehovah: Cursed is the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from Jehovah." Believing the Unseen Over the Seen (2 Cor.4:18) " hile we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen: for the things which are seen are temporal; but the things which are not seen are eternal." So, at my fifth prenatal, things were uneasy. It came and went with almost no words but a lot of tension. As she was again looking and looking for the baby's heartbeat, the baby was kicking up a storm in there. I could feel more than could be seen, but oftentimes you could see my belly bump up and down in different places. Once, during the checking for the heartbeat, in all her frustration with me not agreeing with her equipment that there was no heartbeat to be found, the baby kicked the Doppler. Not only could you hear the sound of the kick, you could see the Doppler bump up. She looked down at my belly, confused. There it was, the sign for her. She appeared to quickly brush it off, but to my brother and sister-in-law who were there with me, the look on her face was clear acknowledgement of something not understood by her. I was excited. I thought maybe now she can believe. The end of the fifth month had been less challenging. The baby was moving; the midwife saw and heard him move. I was thankful for the rest that my mind had for those brief days, but I had no idea what was to come. (Heb.12:1) "Therefore let us also, seeing we are compassed about with so great a cloud of witnesses, lay aside every weight, and the sin which doth so easily beset us, and let us run with patience the race that is set before us." During my sixth-month prenatal visit, the Doppler told the same old story. On top of that, she also could not find the top of what is called the fundus, the top of my womb. It seems that the LORD did hide things from her. But just days before, my two sisters-in-law had had me lay on the floor to feel the baby and they located my fundus right away, right where it was supposed to be. My midwife must have been so frustrated because I believed GOD and would not accept what was apparent to her. After she had finished checking me out she sat down and said to me, "Do you think that GOD could have lied to you so that you would stop protecting yourself from getting pregnant so that He could then get you pregnant?" I heard what she said but didn't comprehend what she had said right away. My sister-in-law laughed. She was immediately aware of what the midwife had suggested. Then it hit me and I said to her, "Did you just ask me if the LORD lied to me?" (2 Cor.4:13) "But having the same spirit of faith, according to that which is written, I believed, and therefore did I speak; we also believe, and therefore also we speak." I said to her the Bible says that He cannot lie: (Ps.119:89) "For ever, O Jehovah, Thy word is settled in heaven." (Ps.89:34) "My covenant will I not break, Nor alter the thing that is gone out of my lips." (Heb.6:18) " t is impossible for God to lie." And that I walk by faith and not by sight. If the LORD said it, then He meant it, no matter what we can see. (2 Cor.5:7) " or we walk by faith, not by sight." She said, "Ooookay," with a sigh, then soon after, we left. We knew that this was trying her faith, as well as mine and everyone else who knew. (Jas. 1:3) " nowing that the proving of your faith worketh patience. (4) And let patience have perfect work, that ye may be perfect and entire, lacking in nothing." The confession I had given her seemed to quicken me. (Mt.10:32) "Every one therefore who shall confess me (speak the same as me) before men, him will I also confess (speak the same) before my Father who is in heaven. (33) But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father who is in heaven." (Heb. 10:23) " et us hold fast the confession of our hope that it waver not; for he is faithful that promised." (Rom. 1:17) "But the righteous shall live by faith." (Rom.10:10) " or with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation." I was clearly thinking and aware that it was not I that lived but that Christ lived in me and I was not my own. (Gal. 2:20) "I have been crucified with Christ; and it is no longer I that live, but Christ liveth in me: and that which I now live in the flesh I live in faith, which is in the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself up for me." I had struggled with double-mindedness-(Jas.4:7) "Be subject therefore unto God; but resist the devil, and he will flee from you. (8) Draw nigh to God, and he will draw nigh to you. Cleanse your hands, ye sinners; and purify your hearts, ye doubleminded. (9) Be afflicted, and mourn, and weep: let your laughter be turned to mourning, and your joy to heaviness. (10) Humble yourselves in the sight of the Lord, and he shall exalt you."-tempted often to believe man to make it easier on me, but I loved Him and I did believe Him, even when things from all directions would come to try to convince me otherwise. (Lk. 7:47) "Wherefore I say unto thee, Her sins, which are many, are forgiven; for she loved much: but to whom little is forgiven, loveth little." Days later, I was going about my day when the thought passed me that Chantel (my midwife) was going to call and tell me that she could not be my midwife any more. Right after the thought, the phone rang. I came rushing out of the bedroom, saying, "It's my midwife; I got it." I answered and there she was, saying exactly what I had heard. The brief heads-up from the LORD was just enough for me to be prepared in Him to talk to her. So I said to her, "Okay, but can I call you when I go into labor? She laughed out loud, and sounding baffled, said, "Yes." So now I was without a midwife. I hoped it would go over well with my husband. When I told him, it was a relief to him at least that she said that we could call her. He was kind of upset with her because he felt like she must not be a very good midwife if she could not tell that I was with baby at six months. I knew that she was good at what she did, but the LORD wanted her and I both to become good at trusting in Him. The next three months were busy and exciting. I shared this with my bother Phillip and my sister Niki before Niki left to go to Dakota to visit her family. I could tell that although my faith in these moments was stronger than it had been, I could feel doubt coming from them. Not intentional, for they both were trying to believe that I was pregnant, even though my midwife was kept from being able to prove it with man's ways. More my brother, than my sister, at this time because my sister had felt the little one kick before she left. Then we went camping in August and prepared for the little one to be here. I thought of baby names. My husband wanted a common name and we did not know if it was going to a boy or a girl. I found name after name; he did not like any of them. Then one day he said to me, I have a name for a boy but I don't want to tell you what it is. So weeks went by and one day he told me. Joshua David was what my husband had chosen, knowing others by this name. I was surprised that he chose it and the neatest thing to me was that He didn't even know what this name meant or that it was our Lord's name translated into our language. One day we found online at a midwifery site a testimony of Chantel's. It went like this. "The LORD told me that I was going to have more children. My husband and I have been trying for years. We began to go to fertility treatments with no success. One day we went and the doctor suggested removing my eggs and fertilizing them and then selecting the one that we wanted and discarding the rest. My husband took me aside and said, 'How far are we going to take this? Do you want a baby so bad that you would kill some of your children to have one?' She said she cried and said to him, 'Whatever you decide, that I will abide in no matter what it is.' He said to her, 'I think the LORD will do it the old fashioned way.' That night they went home and got pregnant-hallelujah! I was so happy for her. And by the faith of her husband did their son Israel David come to be among us. (Heb. 11:1) "Now faith is assurance of hoped for, a conviction of things not seen." Pete and I were growing in anticipation. It was October now and the little one would soon be here, and my sister-in-law's, as well. Soon the news came. Jeni had had her baby, Zayne Zipporiah Daniel Burns. I was so excited. For weeks I had been having false labor. I knew my time was right around the corner. Within a week my contractions came; I went to my mom's and they kept coming. Then they stopped. Days later they began again, very strong. On this day my sister-in-law and brother took me to Chantel's to see if she could check and see if I had begun to dilate. She agreed to see me. As we arrived, I fought the thoughts in my head and went in. (2 Cor.10:4) "( or the weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh, but mighty before God to the casting down of strongholds), (5) casting down imaginations, and every high thing that is exalted against the knowledge of God, and bringing every thought into captivity to the obedience of Christ." She checked me. This time she found my fundus. She was surprised and when she checked me found that I was dilated to two. Again she looked confused. I thanked her and left. But the contractions stopped again. This time they stopped and it seemed like they stopped for good. (Lk. 12:48) "And to whomsoever much is given, of him shall much be required." I left my mom's house and went home. At home my thoughts were burdening and I found that I could not fight them. (1 Chr.28:9) " or Jehovah searcheth all hearts, and understandeth all the imaginations of the thoughts. If thou seek him, he will be found of thee." The storm of intrusive thoughts was unrelenting. Thoughts such as, "See, you're not pregnant; there's just something wrong with you," or, "Your baby's dead, that's why your labor has stopped," etc. As weeks went by, I was loosing hope. The baby moved within but it almost never seemed to be enough to hush the thoughts of, "What will people think?" I often heard, "People will think you are a liar." (Rom.3:4) "God forbid: yea, let God be found true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified (accounted righteous) in thy words, And mightest prevail when thou comest into judgment." I knew how to fight these words. I knew the promises to stand on. I knew that the world calls faith a lie. I knew-but I was weak. (2 Cor. 12:9) " power is made perfect in weakness." I could not fellowship. I could not see others with out crying. I could not talk. I was in a darkness and I felt like the LORD had forgotten me. I could not ask for prayer. I was so far away that at times I did not think anything or anyone could help. My brethren just thought that I was not fellowshipping 'cause I was miserably pregnant. I grew sick. I began coughing and wheezing. For weeks I was in bed, just sleeping. It was the only way to escape the thoughts and voices that plagued me, I thought. I tried to tell my husband. He was so very patient, but telling him did not help me feel better, or so it seemed to me. Two-and-a-half months went by and I did not fellowship. (1 Cor.1:27) " ut God chose the foolish things of the world, that he might put to shame them that are wise; and God chose the weak things of the world, that he might put to shame the things that are strong; (28) and the base things of the world, and the things that are despised, did God choose, and the things that are not, that he might bring to nought the things that are: (29) that no flesh should glory before God. Then my sisters began to come to my house, right into my room, and sat on my bed and fellowshipped with me. I told them honestly that I did not want them there. They said they knew but it did not matter; what I need and what I want are two different things. They came three times, and as the third month came for me to be what I thought was over due, I was very sick. So one day my husband said to me, "Leisa, have you noticed that since you stopped fellowshipping that you have been sick, and that every time you use being sick as an excuse to not fellowship, you get more sick?" I knew, as in times before, that the LORD had come and spoke to me though my husband the very words that would convict my conscience of what was right, and I did not like it. I was being comfortable-my sickness and depression was more comfortable then facing any of the possibilities that the intrusive thoughts had suggested. I really needed help. But I love the LORD, so I in my conscience went to my mom's house to fellowship. Then in the car on the way there, the LORD spoke to me as I was singing to HIM. He spoke to me in my thoughts. He said, "Be it done unto you according to your faith; this is what has been happening with you and your brother." And .I was filled with faith and strengthened. (Phl.4:13) "I can do all things in him that strengtheneth me." (Mt. 17:20) "And he saith unto them, Because of your little faith: for verily I say unto you, If ye have faith as a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this mountain, Remove hence to yonder place; and it shall remove; and nothing shall be impossible unto you." (Mt. 8:13) "And Jesus said unto the centurion, Go thy way; as thou hast believed, be it done unto thee." (Mt. 9:22) "But Jesus turning and seeing her said, Daughter, be of good cheer; thy faith hath made thee whole." (Mt. 9:29) "Then touched he their eyes, saying, According to your faith be it done unto you." During my twelfth month I had a dream that was like one that I had in my third month. In my third month I dreamed that I was having the baby. I was at the end of my bed on the floor and my midwife was there to catch. My husband was in the bed but he left the room. I had the baby. It was a girl. While my midwife sat on the bed with the girl, on the floor was a baby boy. But it was an egg, and my midwife said to me, "Let's put this one back for later." Then, later in my twelfth month, I dreamed again that I was at the end of my bed having the baby, only this time my husband was catching and I had a boy. When I spoke to my sister on the phone, the Lord gave to us a revelation of what the dreams meant. Since the bearing of a child represents bearing fruit, the bearing of a boy child represents the Man child or the fruit of Christ. Through the knowledge the Lord has given us to see on these dreams, He showed us that if I were to of had the child in the natural time, I would have not bore the fruit of Christ: the patience and longsuffering, the faith, and death of my old man. He truly is amazing and faithful to His children to provide the perfect opportunities for bearing good fruit! My brother Dan was also dealing with faith and trusting in the LORD for answered prayer that was not yet seen. All of sudden I could see it-faith is faith-whatever you're believing, that is what will be done unto you. Suddenly the 12 months became clear to me. I had been double-minded, unwittingly. I believed the LORD but sometimes acted as if I didn't, out of fear mostly. (Mk.4:40) "And he said unto them, Why are ye fearful? have ye not yet faith?" I was getting a lesson in faith, not only how to have it but how to walk it. I often felt foolish but determined, scared but excited. To the world I sometimes looked crazy but to the LORD in those times I looked righteous because I believed Him. (Gal. 3:6) "Even as Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned unto him for righteousness." To the LORD I sometimes looked like a frightened child that wanted to trust Him completely but was just learning how. I was overwhelmed that day driving down the road, and suddenly I realized that I was healed! I was no longer sick. When I got to my mom's, I told them about what the LORD had said to me and they were excited. (Lk.22:31) "Simon, Simon, behold, Satan asked to have you, that he might sift you as wheat: (32) but I made supplication for thee, that thy faith fail not; and do thou, when once thou hast turned again, establish thy brethren." Phone calls started poring in at the homes of those believing with me, not many called me though. After the expected due date, I appeared to stop gaining weight. The baby moved about the same as before, as happy as could be within me. I was content in the LORD finally. Sometimes some fears would rise up in me, but not as before. These fears came as a, "What will I say to those who cannot understand faith?" I had no idea, so I gave it to the LORD and He always either gave them ears to hear or peace about the whole thing. It was amazing watching Him work everywhere. Truly blessings abounded, even in unbelievers. Day by day I walked with the LORD. Sometimes He would tell me things that would make things more clear. As time went by He was always there as I trusted Him to prepare me before the storms. One day, as I was cleaning the house, He said to me, "No one knows the day or the hour." It caused me to think about how many people were waiting and wondering, waiting for this baby to be born or wondering if it ever would be, much like the coming of Christ. People waiting for Him to come and others wondering if He really will. It was an awesome thing. My sister Niki returned from Dakota around my twelfth or thirteenth month, I forget, but when she returned she was shocked that I did not have the baby yet. I could hear the doubt in her voice as I talked with my brother on the phone. I swallowed my frustration and gave her and my brother my love then went to visit them. When I got there, I was surprised. Between the phone call and the moment I arrived to their home, they had been filled with faith. My brother Phil said to me things like, "Who's to say how long a person can be pregnant?" Phil often would hear the people at work talking about how I must not really have been pregnant way back then, or that I just must have been really wrong about the date we thought it was supposed to be. Phil quite faithfully stood in the gap and said to them, "All things are possible in Christ," and showed himself to be content and faithful to believe the Lord as well, despite how crazy it made him look to others.. It seemed to me that His faith helped his wife's faith about it, too, and when they saw me I could feel not only the awe for the Lord and His work, but their faith in the miracle inside me. This is the interesting twist. Niki got pregnant while I was pregnant. I was thought to be due in October on the 8th of 2004 and she was thought to be due in March 2005. I was pregnant before she was and pregnant still after she had her baby. And still Niki's faith remained strong. Also, my sister Jenni, who became pregnant on the same day as me, was said to be due October 8th as well. She gave birth to her daughter in October 2004 and then became pregnant again six weeks later and is now just ten weeks after my baby was born. She is overdue to have her new one. God is awesome. Here in my thirteenth or fourteenth month, my Roy was really worrying. He wanted me to go to the doctor and, with tears in his eyes, he said to me that he did not want to lose me. I looked up to him and said, "Roy, I am not my own. I was bought with a price, and this baby is of the LORD and it's not for me to say what should or should not be done. I believe GOD, and GOD said to me, (Jn. 16:21) "A woman when she is in travail hath sorrow, because her hour is come: but when she is delivered of the child, she remembereth no more the anguish, for the joy that a man is born into the world." (Lk. 1:45) "And blessed she that believed; for there shall be a fulfillment of the things which have been spoken to her from the Lord." I said to him, "God said that this baby would be born, and that I was not of this world but of heaven, and the natural laws of this world do not apply to those who believe the Creator and abide in Him." He hugged me and then we all watched the faith of GOD grow in him; it was awesome. One day we were going to have a family barbecue. My sisters that I had not seen since before I thought that I was due in October were going to be there. I talked to Pete (my husband) and told him that I was having a problem. I wanted to see my sisters and I wanted to go to the barbecue, but I did not know what I was going to say to them. My husband said to me, "Well, you know that you could not have been pregnant this whole time." I said to him, "I know that we don't talk about this kind of stuff offended and it is not my will that you should believe what I believe. But I know what the LORD told me and I have to and I want to stand before Him and not man." (Jer.17:5) "Thus saith Jehovah: Cursed is the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from Jehovah." When I am face-to-face with Him, I don't want the shame of having not believed Him when He has always been faithful to me. So then my husband said to me, "Well, then just tell that we are saving for college by not having to buy diapers." We both laughed and ever since then he would always joke about how he was going to name the baby Slow Poke for making us wait so long to meet him. Again we ALL watched the faith of GOD grow in this man, as well. Hallelujah! So I went to the barbecue in faith, and when I arrived every one who had not seen me had peace upon them. They asked me how overdue I was. I told what it seemed like and they had no reservations other than I must be miserable. Everyone took turns feeling the baby move and watching my belly move with the playful one inside. It was a great day. Sometimes I see how silly I am after I see what the LORD can do. In my sixteenth month I had been for months praying that the Lord would send chastening to me for some sin that I had gotten into. I had been struggling with a sin that I myself had been trying to defeat until the Lord reminded me that I could not myself stop the sin that was in my flesh, and that I could do nothing without Him but could do all things in Him. So I stopped trying to stand up against this sin myself and asked the Lord to bring judgment on my flesh and to teach me by example how to take dominion over this land. Finally the correction came. At first I did not know that that is what it was. I had developed shingles, and I was miserable. It was all down the left half of my face and it spread into my eye. My face looked like it had been severely burned. Now in the past, I had had a problem with looking things up on the computer and getting information that I really did not need in the Lord, with all kinds of things pertaining to my pregnancy because of my fears. Apparently, I had not learned my lesson. My face itched and burned. The Lord had informed me that this was an answer to my prayer. Truly I was thankful and excited, but after some time had passed, the misery of it became what I thought was unbearable. I began to look up on the computer my symptoms to see what it was that I had. I found it, then I read about it. I began to reason that I had suffered and now I was ready to have some relief. This is what I found out. Shingles is like herpes. It is incurable. It is spread from person to person. Yet I knew no one and had no contact with any one who had it. It takes three to seven weeks to clear up IF you go to the doctor for meds. If it gets into your eye, it has a 98% chance of causing you to go blind. If you get it in the latter part of your pregnancy and the sores are open when you deliver, you won't have built up antibodies for the little one to have and the baby has a high chance of being born with serious health problems or even death. Now here comes a side trial. I was trying not to be worried. I did not want to tell my husband all the things that I found because I thought he might make me go to the doctor. I figured that if I was not going to have faith, I may need to go, but I wanted to have faith and I was miserable at the same time. I was not sleeping at all; the pain and itching was too intense. The sin I was in this mess of was certainly turned away from me but now because I found out that there is no cure, I felt like the Lord would not mind if I relieved myself some in order to sleep constantly. I was looking on line for something to help me. You're not going to believe what I found, too; here goes. I found that vitamin C helped something and some other something like it helped something else. I reasoned vitamin C comes from oranges, I eat oranges. And the other thing comes from green veggies. I eat those, too; just not enough to get out of them all that I would need to have the relief I want from this. So I got some and I took some. Somehow the swallowing of these pills did not seem to wake me up since it has been around five years since I have taken any kind of pill. But I did. I kept thinking if I have open sores on my body when this baby is born, something bad could happen, as if the Lord was not in control. I tell ya, my mind was in some kind of place. Anyway, one night after suffering for around six days, I was on the computer and the Lord brought to my remembrance all of a sudden "Pharmakia." I WAS SCARED. I used to be a witch; I knew what that was and now I was in it. If I had thought before that this disease that I had had was some how going to hurt this baby, disregarding what the pills I was taking was going to do and forgetting that the Lord knew I would do all of this, now my conscience was in full swing and aware of what I had been doing, stripped of all the reasoning and justification. I went right to my knees talking to the Lord, crying out to Him like I needed to be doing all along. So I prayed. I said to Him that I was sorry that I did not come to Him, that I had sought my own works to save myself from discomfort, forgetting that He was the God of all comfort. I prayed to Him telling Him that corrective infirmity was so difficult to bear and remembered at the same time that it was what I prayed for and was thankful for. It helped me to see that I would have to turn to Him when I was week. So in my now increased weakness and tears I asked Him to heal me, forgiving me for my sin. I believed. I knew that in confessing my sin and repenting of it, He was faithful to forgive me and to heal me. So I said to Him, "Father, I pray that You confirm Your promise in and show me in Your word that I am healed; that I may, no matter what I see, stand on what You have done. I opened my Bible and this is what my finger fell upon. (Jer. 30:14) "All thy lovers have forgotten thee; they seek thee not: for I have wounded thee with the wound of an enemy, with the chastisement of a cruel one, for the greatness of thine iniquity; because thy sins were increased. (15) Why criest thou for thy hurt? thy pain is incurable: for the greatness of thine iniquity, because thy sins were increased, I have done these things unto thee. (16) Therefore all they that devour thee shall be devoured; and all thine adversaries, every one of them, shall go into captivity; and they that despoil thee shall be a spoil, and all that prey upon thee will I give for a prey. (17) For I will restore health unto thee, and I will heal thee of thy wounds, saith Jehovah." Needless to say, I was healed. The next day I woke up and it was much better, the redness in my face was abated and not itching or burning. It had only been one week not three or seven and no doctors. Although I took pills, there was no cure for what I had and only the Lord could have removed it just as fast as He had given it because He uses all things together for our good. By the seventeenth month I had begun to grow impatient again. Every day I dreamed about holding my little one, about the day he would be born, about labor and delivery. I became discouraged and still with child. Then conviction about not waiting upon the LORD came- (Lam.3:25) "Jehovah is good unto them that wait for him, to the soul that seeketh him. (26) It is good that a man should hope and quietly wait for the salvation of Jehovah." -and I knew that I had to confess my impatience. In James 5:16 the Lord says, "Confess therefore your sins one to another, and pray one for another, that ye may be healed." Once I did, I saw and remembered that no one knows the day or hour. I guess I had forgotten that GOD was in control. Then a day came. In my eighteenth month, on Sunday the 10th of July, contractions came. My husband checked me and I was dilated to 5 and the plug of my womb had come out. My sisters and my mothers came. For six or so hours I was in labor. The labor was hard and steady. As the hours went by, one of my sisters began to read to me a book called Hinds' Feet on High Places . As she read, my contractions slowed AGAIN to nothing, then they were gone. I had felt the baby move down very low and lodge in my pelvis, but everyone went home except for my mother-in-law, who stayed till the next Friday and then had to go home. It was a very long week. Then my mom came to stay with me. The next day, my sister-in-law came over and her and my mom and I went to Meijer. On the way back home, my water broke in her car. I was in disbelief. It was happening! I was scared and somehow felt like I was not ready, but the time had come just like the Lord had promised. Labor began and what I thought was hard before was nothing. The pangs came harder and harder, lasting longer and longer and coming faster and faster. My pain was so intense that I could not talk, I could not think. I could do nothing but hope to get though each one as it came. (Isa.26:17) "Like as a woman with child, that draweth near the time of her delivery, is in pain and crieth out in her pangs; so have we been before thee, O Jehovah. (18) We have been with child, we have been in pain, we have as it were brought forth wind; we have not wrought any deliverance in the earth; neither have the inhabitants of the world fallen." My brethren there with me would ask me questions, but I couldn't reply; it was like I was not really there. In the beginning the pangs were hard but nothing compared to how it would get. .I kept thinking, "Who can endure?" (Mt. 24:13) "But he that endureth to the end, the same shall be saved." (2 Tim. 2:10) "Therefore I endure all things for the elect's sake, that they also may obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus with eternal glory." Who will be able to remain unto the end when the tribulation of the saints, that is likened to the travail of a woman, comes? (1 Thes. 5:3) "When they are saying, Peace and safety, then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall in no wise escape." I saw in my travail a vision of some saints going into darkness, forgetting to cry out to the LORD, not knowing how to trust him, just wanting the pain to end, being tempted by man and thoughts to seek relief outside of the LORD. The pain was all there was, nothing else could be seen. I saw this before my pain got bad. (John 16:21) "A woman when she is in travail hath sorrow, because her hour is come: but when she is delivered of the child, she remembereth no more the anguish, for joy that a man is born into the world." At moments I thought I would die; I thought it would not end. I had no sense of anything or anyone: only pain, only suffering, only agony. All my brethren stood around me. Some were excited though and longed to deliver me. All were in prayer, some were scared, some were worried. They all comforted each other in faith. None could comfort me. Sometime after ten, I began to push. After pushing for about 3-1/2 hours, Pete checked to see if he could feel the baby down low. To his surprise, he could feel my cervix again and told me. I suddenly was frightened. In the moments between my contraction, I cried out for Jenni, my sister, to come to talk to me. I said to her, "Say something to me, say something...he felt my cervix...say something." I couldn't say much more through four contractions. I got that much out, but she understood. She said to me, "Leisa, it's okay, the LORD is in control. Don't walk by sight, walk by faith. He can overcome anything. Don't worry about what things seem to be; just do what you need to do and the LORD will take care of the rest." The LORD had comforted me through her perfectly. At the hearing of the good news, I was encouraged to keep pushing without fear. At 4:45, I had been in the tub for hours. I felt like the baby was not coming. I had been pushing for over six hours and was exhausted, too exhausted to go on. I cried out to my Father in heaven. I said to Him in my mind, "The baby is not turned; I can feel that he is not coming down. LORD, I need You to turn him so he can come. I can't go on. I need You to strengthen me...help me...I'm dying...." (Ps.34:17) " cried, and Jehovah heard, And delivered them out of all their troubles. (18) Jehovah is nigh unto them that are of a broken heart, and saveth such as are of a contrite spirit. (19) Many are the afflictions of the righteous; but Jehovah delivereth him out of them all." After I prayed, I got out of the tub and had needed to sit, still pushing. Something began to happen. I felt a burning...a deep burning...torturous yet welcome, burning. I knew, though I had never felt anything like it before, that the baby was coming down. Every contraction that came, I fought. I don't want to push...it's too painful-I want to push, the baby is coming. I would struggle each time and overcome and push, and found that each time I overcame, strength came into me and I was giving thanks, every minute I was thankful. (Phl.4:4) "Rejoice in the Lord always: again I will say, Rejoice." (Epe.5:20) " iving thanks always for all things in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ to God, even the Father." I felt the LORD with me. Then, suddenly, I felt the baby's head crown. My mother called my husband and he came quick into the bathroom, opened the shower door, and said to me, "Leisa, push!" I did, and the baby was delivered into the arms of his dad. As Joshua's dad held him, at first he did not breathe, but there was no fear in my husband. With confidence and love, he held him and patiently helped him to breathe. Moments passed and my mom called my sister. My sister said to tell the baby to breathe in the name of Jesus. My mom told my mother-in-law and she commanded the baby to breathe in Jesus' name. He breathed. (Jn.14:12) "Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater than these shall he do; because I go unto the Father. (13) And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son." Then I took my son into my arms, and him and I took a bath, and rested. (Heb.4:3) "For we who have believed do enter into that rest." (Jn.11:40) "Jesus saith unto her, Said I not unto thee, that, if thou believedst, thou shouldest see the glory of God?" (Lk.1:45) "And blessed she that believed; for there shall be a fulfillment of the things which have been spoken to her from the Lord." Three days later, as I was resting in bed, the Lord laid on my mind these things, signs of a perfect deliverance of the LORD, that we can rest in HIM, and I'm sure is a shadow of things to come. (Gen.8:4) "And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat." Not sure yet what the meaning is, but it is only two times that the seventeenth day is mentioned and the only time that the seventh month and seventeenth day is mentioned at the same time. Joshua was born in the 7th month on the 17th day in 2005...2+5 =7. He was the 7th person in the house that night. He was born at 5:20...5+2 = 7 and he weighed 6 lbs. 8 oz...6+8 = 14...2/14 = 7 and measured 21 inches long...3/21 = 7 My water broke at 3:15...first 7 hours begins I began pushing at 10:15...second 7 hours begins He was born at 5:20 am...second 7 hours ends 14 hours of travail...2/14 = 7 76 weeks & 3 days with child...7+6+3 = 16...1+6 = 7 His whole name is Joshua David Miller = 17 letters His name transliterated is Joshua David Miller =706 `o`u`a~a`aa'e~a^i'e`i`io , 7/706=100.6=7 777 = "Church of God" (1 Tim.3:15). "Tabernacle of God" (Rev.21:3). January 8, 2004...to...July 17, 2005 365 31 28 31 30 31 30 9 = 5 5 5 days with child 5 is the number of Grace 5, 5s is the number of Grace multiplied by Grace. 555 is the gematria for God. (Rom.1:17) "The righteous shall live by faith," for we have nothing that we did not receive from Him. (1 Cor.4:7) "For who maketh thee to differ? and what hast thou that thou didst not receive? but if thou didst receive it, why dost thou glory as if thou hadst not received it?" I thank the Lord for all that He has taught us. Leisa Miller (Note from David: Some have questioned an 18-month pregnancy but just a few days after Leisa gave this testimony on our broadcast, God sent this testimony of another 18-month pregnancy from someone we didn't know.) Kirk Willow Greetings, in Jesus' name. The last time I wrote to God's people on Sept. 12, 2004 my wife Martha was six (6) months' pregnant. Today, almost a year later, Sept. 5, 2005, she is now in her eighteenth (18th) month of pregnancy. It is a miracle. It is a sign. The Lord spoke to me in the Fall of 2003 and said, "The child is a sign of destruction, before the child is born there shall be destruction in America." This has been fulfilled as New Orleans, Mississippi, and Florida testify. We shall all perish, except we repent. God has resigned Himself to destroy this nation, He has turned his back to forsake it. Only destruction and misery lie ahead. Back in the Fall of 2004, God spoke to me that He was giving me three (3) signs. The first sign was the child, the sign of destruction before the birth. The second sign was that Florida would be ravished by the end of September 2004. The third sign was that Miami, Florida would be struck by a brutal blow from the hand of God. It would be overwhelming. Chaos, sorrow, devastation, death, destruction. He had me prophesy against the city. The first two signs have been fulfilled. Florida was ravished by hurricanes by the end of Sept. 2004. My wife is still with child today and destruction in America has happened in the form of Hurricane Katrina. New Orleans is gone. Mississippi destroyed. Soon Miami, Florida will be devastated. God has commanded me to warn all His people, "Leave Miami, Florida! Flee out of Miami! New Orleans is your example that God will make waste an entire city. Oh, people of God, hear the word of the Lord." Oh, Miami, Miami, Hear the word of the Lord. I will cut off old and young. I will cut off man and woman. Your streets shall be full Of chaos and destruction. Your pomp shall cease, Your haughtiness shall be brought low. And I the Lord Shall be exalted in judgment. And ye shall know that I, the Lord God, have brought this Judgment against thee. ------------------------------------------------------- Leisa Miller After I read this, I called my mom and my sister Jenni and shared it with them. Later, my sister Jenni called me back and asked me if I had talked to my mom. I replied, "No." Jenni then told me that the Lord had given her to go and read Luke 13:4-5 and 11-12. Here's what they say: (Lk.13:4) "Or those eighteen, upon whom the tower in Siloam fell, and killed them, think ye that they were offenders above all the men that dwelt in Jerusalem? (5) I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish." (Lk.13:11) "And behold, a woman that had a spirit of infirmity eighteen years; and she was bowed together, and could in no wise lift herself up. (12) And when Jesus saw her, he called her, and said to her, Woman, thou art loosed from thine infirmity." Infirmity: 1) want of strength, weakness, infirmity (a) of the body (b) its native weakness and frailty (c) feebleness of health or sickness (Blue Letter Bible) Jenni asked if she knew what they meant but my mom only could figure that it had something to do with the number 18 since the number was present in both. Then the Lord showed Jenni what it meant. In Luke13:4, it shows that there will be destruction on those who do not repent. If you noticed in the letter, the last part of Luke 13:5 is quoted. Except we repent, we will likewise perish. In Lk.13:11, it shows that there will be a deliverance in the Church, not of sickness of body but from the curse and burden. Both of these in Luke and both of the 18-month pregnancies show this exactly: the child of destruction; the child of deliverance. Glory be to our God (Note from David: Since this man-child was named Joshua David, who were both types of the man-child, the 18-month pregnancy could show a slight delay in the birth of the man-child until a time of judgment and deliverance. This also could fit with the delay in a couple of judgments we have seen recently. Also this child is a Miller, which is one who prepares seed to be digested by men. Seed is the Word, according to Jesus. The man-child is going to be the greatest sower of seed in the hearts of men since Jesus spoke the parable of the sower.) Destruction upon the South, USA LaTonya N. Malinconico Destruction in the City LaTonya N Malinconico Late 2004 LaTonya N Malinconico a.k.a. Kaoticgal tha prophetess http://www.visionsofthelastdays.com http://www.secta7.com admin@visionsofthelastdays.com Dream One: I was in the middle of tall downtown buildings and a huge flood was coming so a group of people and I decided to hold on to the buildings inside of this tall see-through building. We were a little high up in the business building. The wind was huge and swept away almost anyone who was not holding on to something. And if you were holding on to something, you had to pray and hold as tight as you could because the wind came, then a big wave of water came. Then when people thought they were safe and were starting to get off the buildings, another wave came. I remember I was in the street and I looked to my left side and saw the buildings shaking and slowly water started to come. I started to run back to the building but the dream was in slow motion. I barely made it before the water hit. I think I was in New York because the buildings were so huge. Somehow we got on a train ride and were leaving and I remember green grass but there was no conductor and everyone on the train looked tired. Then I woke up. I had forgot about this dream until I started to research and write about my dream concerning the destruction of the south. So that is why it is posted along the destruction of the south dream. This dream along with many other people's dreams about New York could mean that God is not playing when he shows us the things that will happen. If we don't warn the people, God's judgment will be on us for being bad watchmen. It also serves as a reminder that if we don't have Jesus Christ as our foundation, we will get swept away by the wind and water like a house built on sand. So let's be prepared. Destruction upon the South, USA LaTonya N Malinconico Visions & Dreams March 2005 Dream Two: My husband and I were together at my Aunt's House and I was telling them that something was happening outside. It was dark all of a sudden and loud thunders where everywhere suddenly. Then we went through one of the doors in the house and I was outside by myself and there were remnants of water everywhere. There was lightening. Huge lightening and I could tell where they would hit. Very loud!!!! Everything was flooded and desolate. I was looking around and I could see people scattered and homeless people. A few trees still stood tall. I went under one tree because I didn't want to be hit by lightening but a woman came and told me not to stand under the tree because there was a huge puddle of water there and the lightening was coming straight for it. In slow motion she grabbed me and the lightening struck and I felt it a little but it hit her instead. There were people in trenches and they were all scattered everywhere. I woke up and went to the bathroom. There I was just starting to think about the interpretation when God gave me an open vision. It was a map of the United States and zoomed in to the south and there appeared what seemed to be a fault line that spread across the tip of California to the East coast of Florida & Georgia. Under the line everything was flooded, destroyed or devastated. Then He said that the South will be destroyed because she used to be the Bible Belt and now she is a whore! Immoral in sex-sins and letting everyone run over her. I walked away and tried to go back to sleep but I couldn't and I felt sad for the South so I prayed to God that he would forgive the Sins of the South and prolong her judgment. (Isaiah 1:18-21) Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool. (19) If ye be willing and obedient, ye shall eat the good of the land: (20) But if ye refuse and rebel, ye shall be devoured with the sword: for the mouth of the LORD hath spoken it . (21) How is the faithful city become an harlot! it was full of judgment; righteousness lodged in it; but now murderers. The Bible belt from Secular Sources A bible belt is an area of fundamentalist Protestantism, where reliance on teachings from the holy books of Christianity is at its most pervasive, and often its most literal. In particular, the Bible Belt (with capitals) covers a number of southern and Midwestern states of the U.S. The "belt" terminology is common in the U.S. to describe regions with a roughly east-west orientation that share a feature: e.g., the Rust Belt (declining industrial areas) and the Sun Belt (hot-weather states in the south and west). "We all know the phrase, but where exactly is The Bible Belt? It is a geographical region in the South and midsection of the United States. To be a true Bible Belt Christian, you must have a clear understanding of the things you don't do, like smoking, dancing, going to the pool hall, drinking, or making a public appearance without a Bible in hand. You must believe that your actions are controlled by the Holy Spirit and that doing God's will is the most important part of your life -- no matter what scoffers might think. Some say that certain people in the Bible Belt go overboard in both their religious and political (usually conservative) practices. But Bible Belters believe that their lives are totally controlled by God and they could no more change their ways than fly. Furthermore, they don't apologize for their seemingly irrational behavior. Like a favorite bumper sticker declares, "Christians aren't perfect, just forgiven." The Great Awakening was the beginning of the movement. If there was a "Bible Belt" in America before then, it was located in the North with such groups as the Massachusetts Puritans and the Pennsylvania Quakers. But, about 1790, something happened. It was as if a great wave suddenly flooded the land. The second Pentecost had begun." Today in music, the south has impacted the lives of many through sex, drugs, cars and more sex. In videos today, especially in hip hop and pop, they are wearing no clothes. The rich go to strip bars. The girls get breast implants to be in MTV's Spring Break. Pornography is made in the south. All of these factors along with the fact that there are so many gay couples in Atlanta and so much fornication in the sunny Miami Beach. Even here in Houston, if you stand up for the bible, they take it out of the court and tell you to go talk to the Supreme Court. Gay marriages, abortion clinics, it is all enough to God. The South needs to repeat. I remember last year when a friend of mine told me that she had just come from a conference of preachers (nationally know) and that they were all staying at this top hotel. My friend loves to travel and have sex with famous people. She wants to be a groupie, so she is always going around to events. I asked her why was she at a preacher's conference. And she told me that they needed girls. Most of these well-known preachers where from the south and over big churches but they are addicted to porn and sex. Many, she said were well over there 50's and still sinning. God does not like that. Things like that make me wonder why the secular world is not interested in the gospel sometimes. They can tell when people are fake more than Christians sometimes. As Christians we are to stand up against the injustice of this nation, the sins of the pastors and teachers. God told us to preach the gospel. If the Bible Belt is going to be judged by God for the things she has not done and taking care of, where does that leave me and you? Simply, we are to pray and ask God to forgive the sins of this nation and the South. We are to help those pastors who do have sins to stop and repent before the Lord. We are to make it hard for them to play sex on regular TV. We are God's people and he wants a church with no blemish or spot. I pray for the South and hope that God will prolong his judgment a little while longer. I have included a map of my dream along with references to Nita Johnson's dream and Dumitru Duduman's dream about America being destroyed to show the similarities of our dreams so that America can wake up. This is real, it is not a game to play with the Lord. In Christ, LaTonya Malinconico This was the map in my dream- LaTonya Malinconico The following article was from Mrs. R. B. Braswell (Hattie Irene French) taken from http://www.pebblesofhope.org and http://www.aarons-advocates.org . This is the Map of gulf of Mexico and the Rio Grande river flooding of Texas as Hattie saw it for the duration (two years) of the Visions and warnings given to her. For many months only the Rio Grande River flooding was involved; then later for only a month or so, the Gulf Coast tipped into the Gulf of Mexico and was flooded (covered) with water. No city names were mentioned and no absolute details as to where the cut off lines are to be were given. She was explicit about the southern lines being perfectly straight and helped me produce this map insofar as her poor eyesight could relate. She always refereed to the straight southern border map as "Ugly Texas" Very close to the end of her life she heard the Words: "I Shall Restore!" and saw the form, (map) of Texas restored back to it's original shape; her comment was. "Oh Texas is beautiful again!" This is the flooding map of the United States as Seen by my mother, Hattie; Dumitru Duduman, Dell, and Ephraim. America will burn areas are shown in Yellow, ALL of New York State will burn, not only New York City! California, Florida, ALL of New York state is destroyed, and the city of Las Vegas are shown in yellow overlay and were seen by Dumitru Duduman as being "Sodom and Gomorra" and to be destroyed. The blue wavy portions of Texas are as seen by mother. The Mississippi River Valley Basin is outlined exactly as Dell saw it by the names of numerous cities that he was given. Mother and Ephraim saw that area to be larger toward the top as the Mississippi drainage area widens to include the whole of the Great lakes and some of the lakes of Canada as well. Essentially the entire Mississippi River Valley is to be flooded by the Great Lakes draining through it. Mother saw two mushroom clouds at the very top of the space and Duduman was told that a place of Russian penetration would be in the state of Minnesota. The whole area is a well know geologic fault zone with the Madrid Fault underling the whole region. There are countless articles on the Madrid Fault disaster of 1811 on the net. All of these visions and warnings to mother focus around Isaiah 18 with some references to Revelation 18. Duduman was given all of Revelation 18 and told "This is the United States!" The messages are about how repent unto salvation and how to live a clean life and not about fear. The Vision Nita Johnson Excerpt from "Prepare For The Winds Of Change II." On January 27, 1989, I had been in a spirit of prayer all night and was finally just starting to dose off to sleep. Suddenly, I was fully awakened by a vision of a map of the United States. It was not a vision in my head but was what some call an open vision out in front of me. The map was in a silvery light and was completely sectioned off into states. just as suddenly as it had appeared, I heard a voice, as robust as the sound of many waters yet with great intensity, begin to give directions. Starting with the West Coast, the voice would speak and that same silvery light would shoot down from the direction of heaven like a laser beam onto the map. The light would follow the path directed by the voice and then effects would follow as I will explain. First, the voice cried out: 'The West Coast, California, Oregon and Washington, starting from the southern most tip all the way up to Seattle, will suffer natural disasters, such as earthquakes, floods and fire, and enemy attack. "The line shot up the map taking most of California and leaving only a small section that bordered on Arizona and Nevada. It went up through Oregon taking about half of that state and then on up through Washington, taking about one-third of that state, then moving out toward the ocean through Seattle. The minute the line touched Seattle, everything west of the line disappeared, The voice then cried out, "Michigan, Indiana, Ohio, and Illinois will suffer natural disasters, such as floods, earthquakes and tornadoes, and enemy attack. immediately, this line started at about where Lansing, Michigan, is and fanned down in what became two lines going south first. Then one line swung back up easterly through Ohio, going out over the Great Lake Erie through Cleveland. The other line swung down through Indiana and then headed back up northwesterly and went out into the Great Lake Michigan up by the way of the northeast corner of Illinois and out through Chicago. When it was done, it looked like two "u"s side byside. This affected areas all through the region, for instance, as far east as Detroit and easterly in Michigan to the Great Lake itself on the west. The whole southern part of the glove experienced cataclysmic results. Next, the voice called out, "Most of Louisiana and all of Texas will suffer natural disasters, floods, hurricanes, tornadoes, and enemy attack. " The line shot up through New Orleans east of Baton Rouge, up through Shreveport in a kind of wiggly way then cut off all of Texas. Texas disappeared. Louisiana experienced devastation but didn't disappear. I was ready for this to end, yet the Lord continued.- New York down through Pennsylvania, the Virginias, the eastern Part of Tennessee, Georgia, and Florida will suffer natural disasters of every kind, hurricanes, flooding, earthquakes, etc. and enemy attack. "Then everything that was east of the line disappeared. The Lord continued, "The Grand Canyon will suffer natural disasters. " The line seemed to start at the bottom of the Grand Canyon heading northerly straight up to Montana through Yellowstone. This was also accompanied by cataclysmic disasters like floods, earthquakes, volcanoes, and fires. This affected a substantial area, including Arizona, Utah, western parts of Wyoming, the eastern tip of Idaho and southwestern part of Montana, The regions did not disappear, but experienced utter catastrophe. Then Missouri, Mississippi, Arkansas, Alabama, West Tennessee, Kentucky, and on it went. There were severe heat waves, hailstorms, energy blackouts, severe snow and ice storms as well as extreme arctic cold spells to the loss of many lives. I saw it so often occur in some the least likely areas, famines, pestilence, plagues, and more. Nevada and Utah were all but destroyed through natural disasters of every kind and ultimately enemy attack. They did, however, remain on the map (Please note that I am not declaring that the states that disappeared fell off into the sea. I don't know why they disappeared, only that they did. Consequently, I am merely relating what I saw, not trying to interpret.) I was so dumbstruck that I felt numb, even bruised. It was hard for me to pull it all together in my mind. I just sat there in shock. Finally, I realized if I didn't write it down, I'd lose a lot of it as there was so much detail. So I wrote what I could remember Some states, such as New Mexico, were lost from my memory. I couldn't remember what happened to them, so I didn't record it. I distinctly remember, however, that the only part of the US. that was not devastated was the Central United States, a region basically west of the Missouri River, as I have indicated on the map. I also realized that many of the things that would begin happening immediately would be of an unusual nature, such as natural disasters that would seem improbable or even impossible, at least for that particular geographical area, I was instructed that this sequence of events would start immediately, picking up momentum with time until eventually the succession would be happening with gunshot rapidity, until all was fulfilled. It's important to understand that the natural disasters did not specifically follow "the lines", but the lines seemed to indicate the borders of the severely affected areas. The only one exception was the line that went up through the Grand Canyon north to Montana. In that case, the line seemed to symbolize the central core of action with a radiating aftermath both to the east and west. I saw natural disasters in Alaska and the Hawaiian Islands followed by warheads. Finally, I saw a severe diminishing of our nation's military. Officers, and enlisted men, as well as the closing of many critical bases were part of the scenario. Our ability to defend ourselves was critically reduced, to a point of near ineffectiveness. (The Military cut down was not incorporated in this vision, but was seen many years ago.) These disasters have already begun, just as He said they would. Since that vision, there have been two earthquakes in California, terrible fires, a hurricane on the East Coast that did what all the meteorologists said could never happen. The storm entered inland through Charleston, South Carolina, went north and headed back into the ocean through New York. Flooding for the first time in history was recorded in a community in northern Ohio resulting in unusual deaths. Most recently, there was an earthquake near the southern border of Missouri, and floods in the plains, and terrible disaster in Florida from tornadoes. Those are just a few instances, but hopefully, they're enough to drive the point home. These things are neither freak accidents, as some would have you believe, nor are they just satanic humor on mankind. Church, please realize that the Lord commanded everything that I saw hit the map. He also told me it was part of the sequential calamities which are warnings ultimately leading to full judgment assigned to this country. They are like blinking red lights along the path of judgment. Go back! Stop! Repent! The end is at hand! Will you hear? Will you pray? How in His great mercy would He gladly stop or minimize catastrophe for His praying church! As I said earlier, the church will be here through much of it, but not the worst of it. At that, some will utter a sigh of deep relief, but I can't. I don't want people I love left behind to experience that. I saw the devastation. Never again will the people be able to sing, "Oh, beautiful for spacious skies, with amber waves of grain, for purple mountain majesty above the fruited plain. America, America, God shed His grace on thee, and crown thy good with brotherhood, from sea to shining sea." It will no longer be true. One better to quote will be Jeremiah: Oh, that my head were waters, and my eyes a reservoir of tears, that I might weep day and night for the slain of the daughter of my people! (Jer. 9:1 Amp.) The Lord does not delight in the announcements He has made. He has waited this long time that we, as a people, might repent. Some foolishly say, "God is love. He wouldn't do that." My friends, God is also holy and for that reason He must let this nation who is so steeped in the love of sin and idolatry drink the whole cup of wrath that it has been storing up for two hundred years. If God judged Israel even one time for the sin of the nation, then He must unleash that same righteous judgment against America. Last, but not least, it doesn't really matter if we believe all, part, or any of what has been written in these pages. If our response is continued apathy, it will all come to pass, most of it before our eyes, as the Lord will fulfill His purpose. The motivating factor, which will cause Him to purge the land by fire, is the sin that has and will continue to rise up before His throne day and night. Canada will experience as much devastation through various forms of natural disaster, as America. As I shared in an earlier chapter, it will be for the same reasons. Both will experience the purging fire of judgment. The Lord weeps over the souls of men who have and will suffer through these calamities. He weeps, for His heart breaks over our pain. Fear and unbelief blinds our eyes. Jesus longs to give His light and faith, and bring the sinner to repentance. The things that have moved Him to withhold His judgments up to this point are His intense love for His church and His now over extended mercy for the unrepentant.

Phoenix Arizona Nuclear Destruction Prophecies

Eternal Agony — Mon, 04 Mar 2013 19:02:54 -0500

Phoenix Arizona Nuclear Destruction Prophecies 8 Babylon has suddenly fallen and been destroyed. Wail for her! Take balm for her pain; perhaps she may be healed. We would have healed Babylon, but she is not healed. Forsake her, and let us go everyone to his own country; for her judgment reaches to heaven and is lifted up to the skies. The LORD has revealed our righteousness. Come and let us declare in Zion the work of the LORD our God. Holy Bible, Jeremiah 51:8-10 Nuclear Attack on Phoenix http://www.unleavenedbreadministries.org/?page=phoenix Tom Heward, Richard Keltner, and Mike Roell have been ministering in New York City for about 2 years now and they are seeking the Lord regarding additional outreaches to get this warning message out. The following dreams about Phoenix Arizona being destroyed were given to them and they went to that city May 22-29, 02 handing out warnings and preaching wherever the Lord opened doors. They believe repentance by the church or a major outreach to the city could delay or avert the event. However since neither is currently going on they believe the curtain is closing for these options and we could see this event come to pass very soon. WORLD TRADE CENTER Dream given to Richard Keltner. February 19th, 2001 (fulfilled) I was standing at the top of the South Tower of The World Trade Center Building and I was facing west. I was able to see everything below me and everything looked normal. Suddenly, what felt to be an earthquake coming from below, triggered explosions and rumblings. I tried to keep standing by balancing myself; it felt like being on a surfboard. I heard screaming...screaming like I have never heard before in my life. The North Tower slowly bent itself to a position where it was leaning in front of me and something stopped it. I had not fallen but it looked as if I was about to. I could see people screaming through the windows...saying, "Help me...please, please...Help me!!!" (the screaming was something I cannot explain in this message...it was terrible) The earth had stopped shaking but both buildings were swaying and unstable. I got on my knees and prayed, "Father God, In Jesus Name, please help me out of this My God!! I do not want to die like this Dear God!! Oh Father, save me from this terrible death of falling to the ground!! My house is a mess at home! Don't let me die leaving such a mess! Amen!" As soon as I got done praying an old woman dressed in white approached a window on my left. She was walking on a platform that somehow was raised all the way to the top of the building. The screaming of many people kept roaring in the background. It sounded like thousands. Some screamed, "Oh My God, help us please...help me please!!!" The old woman walked up to some safety window that snapped open and said, "Come!" The people screaming could see me leaving the other unstable tower and screamed even louder now. I said to her, "What about all these screaming for their lives?" She said, "They do not know The Father God and will die today just like you see...they will fall to the ground and nothing can save them." CATASTROPHIC EVENT Dream given to Richard Keltner. March 24th, 2002 (pending) I was on the phone with my old boss from a company I worked for about 6 years ago in the Security Industry. As I talked to him on the phone I mentioned that he should Get Right With God because there was not much time left before the End of The World. As I explained this I mentioned how I had had a dream on February 19th of 2001 about the World Trade Center falling down and how it came to pass on September 11th of 2001. Then I added that I also had a dream that showed The United States looking like it had fallen into 3rd World Country Status. All of a sudden he said to me "Wait a minute, my daughter had a similar dream!" At this point in the dream I was no longer on the phone with him but in his house looking at his little girl who appeared to be about 6 or 7 years old (his daughter in real life is now about 16 years old). As I talked with him, in his house, he explained to me that "He was not a Christian and his daughter wasn't either, and he concluded that the dream she had might not be true." I told him that it says in the Word of God that The Lord would pour out His Spirit in the form of dreams and visions on "ALL FLESH" in the End Times. As I explained this he said, "His daughter's dream was showing that a Catastrophic Event would be taking place soon that will drag the United States down into 3rd World Country Status." I felt ( within the dream ) that as he told me this it meant an entire city would be disappearing (I could not tell if this meant that there would be a "Nuclear" or "Chemical" Attack or Something Else). All that was clear is that a city will be attacked and that most of the people in this city will be GONE. This event will bring the United States into total devastation. At the end of the dream I heard PHOENIX , ARIZONA . Shortly after having this dream me and my friends prayed for confirmation about the Location and the type of Attack. One of my Christian friends has a daughter who lives in the Phoenix Area and the same day I got the dream his daughter received an e-mail from a man she had only met once on campus with the screen name "FuturePhxFire." He was a local fireman trainee and college student whose heroes happen to be the 100's of firemen who recently died in the WTC incident. Then, that same evening I went to a prayer meeting and shared it with a Pastor leading prayer who said God told him 2 weeks ago that some type of Nuclear Attack will take place in Arizona, and that he didn't want to say anything, but when I shared the dream he said he had to talk about it. So you can see why this needs to be tested by other Christians as soon as possible. MIKE WALLACE NEWS CAST Dream given to Richard Keltner April 10th, 2002 (pending) I was watching the news on T.V. and Mike Wallace was the newscaster. It seems that Mike Wallace had left CBS NEWS and started his own show. He was announcing "INSIDE INFORMATION" he had received regarding a " TERRORIST PLOT " to launch a " TACTICAL NUKE " against PHOENIX , ARIZONA . He was using several colored magic markers to indicate on a map of the world, with the United States as the central focus, the various nations that were involved "behind the scenes" in this complex scheme to assist the Islamic Terrorists in carrying out their desires against the United States. PHOENIX UPDATE Dream given to Mike Roell June 5th, 2002 In this dream I was in Upstate New York and I was speaking to a young man who was a Muslim. He was asking me, "Am I going to be O.K. with all these troublous times coming". He wanted to know if he was right with God. I said, "No, you're not going to make it, you're not right with God, you're not right with Jesus Christ." As I was speaking to this man a whole bunch of young people gathered around me and they wanted to hear what I had to say. Then I started telling them about America's Destruction and about being in the Last Days and all the Calamities about to come upon Us. Then an older woman came over to me and asked, "Are you the same guy that was talking about destruction and naming all the cities like New York City?" And I said, "Yes, New York City, California, Las Vegas and Florida." Then I said, "I have an UPDATE for you and here is the latest one, PHOENIX , ARIZONA." I said, "PHOENIX IS GONNA GET NUKED!!" PHOENIX OVERTHROWN, Dream given to Tom Heward April 7th, 2002 (pending) Last night I had a brief dream while sitting in front of my computer screen and nodding off to sleep for a couple of minutes. In the dream I saw the word " PHOENIX " only the word was TURNED UPSIDE DOWN. Upon waking the Holy Spirit immediately "quickened" the following Old Testament Verse to me to help me understand the meaning of the dream. 2 Kings 21:13 ( Good News Bible Translation ) I will punish Jerusalem ( Phoenix, Arizona ) as I did Samaria ( The World Trade Center ), as I did King Ahab of Israel and his descendants. I will wipe Jerusalem (Phoenix, Arizona) clean of its people, as clean as a plate that has been wiped and TURNED UPSIDE DOWN! Prior to having this dream I had gone to a home bible fellowship and during that time God spoke to me out of the Book of Jonah reminding me of my calling to warn the American People of God's Coming Judgments on This Nation, if we as a Nation and the Christians in particular, do not repent (2 Chronicles 7:14 ). The Spirit of Weeping and Mourning was all over me as I pleaded with God to be merciful to Phoenix, Arizona and not allow this city to be wiped off the face of the earth in a terrorist attack. PHOENIX , ARIZONA IS ABOUT TO EXPERIENCE "THE SUM OF ALL FEARS" NUCLEAR TERRORISM. We are basing this warning on the accuracy of dreams given by The Holy Spirit to several individuals with the calling of "Watchmen to America" as defined in Ezekiel 33. Make no mistake about it God has declared to This Nation of America over and over that there would be a " PAY DAY " for the abominations committed in Her Midst (divorce, infidelity, abortion, homosexuality, pornography, greed, lying, hypocrisy, witchcraft, sorcery and perversion). The weather has become bizarre, the rain no longer sustains the farmers' crops, wild beasts attack the people, the economy is a bubble of false hope, and God is knocking at America's Door with even Greater Threats of Judgment (Nuclear, Chemical and Biological Terrorism) as He said He would to a FALSE HEARTED PEOPLE who no longer serve Jesus Christ but their own appetites. For nearly 30 years II CHRONICLES 7:14 has been spoken from the Pulpits of America as "God's Stated Remedy for the Moral, Spiritual, Social and Economic Dilemmas" facing Our Nation. But the People of America only want to hear "Good Things" and the "Pastors and Prophets" in the Pulpits of America are only willing to tell them that which they long to hear. That God only desires to " BLESS HIS PEOPLE ". But as God's Prophets Ezekiel, Jeremiah, and Isaiah knew... God reserves "THE MOST HORRIBLE OF JUDGMENTS", not for the pagans or the heathen, but for "HIS OWN PEOPLE" who no longer love Him sincerely but only with " LIP SERVICE " like the " ADULTEREOUS WIFE ". And so God in turning over all Judgment to His Son... JESUS CHRIST ... is preparing Additional Calamities against This Nation and the only thing that will change God's Mind regarding The Destruction of Phoenix at the hands of Evil Men (as God clearly stated He would do in DEUTERONOMY 28:49-57 ) is a change in heart, mind and action by the People of God living in Phoenix... serious enough to give God a reason to "Change His Mind Regarding His Ordained Calamity" (as God clearly stated in JEREMIAH 18:1-12 ). Otherwise Phoenix, Arizona is Doomed...Your Children Have No Future...because Destruction is Coming and Nothing can Stop It. At most it could be delayed or diminished through heartfelt intercession but nothing short of a City Wide Repentance among His People can stop this Judgment of The Lord. TERRORIST ATTACK on PHOENIX ARIZONA DREAM 1/03/03 I am walking down a road, heading toward a high school. There are a lot of young people gathering, filling both sides of the road. As I come to the center of the crowd I see some people with a table set up for prophecy and readings. I come to the leader (a woman) and say "what do you see for AMERICA?" IF you really can tell the future? She said " we would win the WAR ON TERROR, and the economy would rebound. I said with great boldness " THERE WILL BE A TERRORIST ATTACK, PHOENIX ARIZONA WILL BE NUKED! THE STOCK MARKET WILL CRASH. THIS IS THE LORDS JUDGMENT. I started yelling to the crowd that these people were DEMONIC and they were leading AMERICA to destruction. The woman leader then started calling curses and demonic attack's against me. I was not shaken and came back at her and said these same curses will come back on you seven fold and you will receive a sexually transmitted disease as judgment. I then entered a church and sat down. There was a man sitting down next to me, taking notes. Someone was speaking from the pulpit, it seemed like he was going on forever, a lot of nothing. No anointing, or revelation, dead word. I then spoke softly to the man sitting taking notes, "PHOENIX ARIZONA WILL GET NUKED. 3 TIMES I SAID IT TO THE MAN. May the LORD JESUS prepare us all for these events. http://www.nextcrusade.com Nuclear Attack on Phoenix (2) http://www.unleavenedbreadministries.org/?page=phoenix2 Think about this as you read the following prophetic warnings. In the past when our government took a stand with the Palestinians to divide Israel for political and economic reasons we have always been quickly judged. In the past week (July 2, 2002) our government has backed off from pushing the "Palestinian State" issue and clearly sided with Israel. They are putting Arafat in his place and defending right instead of oil and their coalition against Saddam. Many have E-mailed telling me they are praying for mercy. These things give me a feeling that God will have mercy and that the judgment prophesied below will be delayed. On July 2, 2002 God impressed me that for these reasons He would delay this judgment for the summer of 2002 but previous to this He gave me two confirmations that the warning was truly a word from Him. I do not believe this judgment is deleted, only delayed. Tom Heward, whose dreams are in these two articles, contacted me on July 3, to tell me that God had told him that this judgment would not come to pass on July 4th. Prophecies, Dreams & Visions: For today? Date setting and delays? How to judge the false. Your servant, Dave ATTACK (Editor's note: Terrorists do not appear to have the technology to make a missile strike on the U.S. but the Chinese have been furnishing them with their own technology and equipment. The dreams below may be indicating that the Chinese may be supplying them with missiles. The Mike Wallace News Cast dream on the previous page points out that the terrorists have help from other nations and that missiles will be used.) MISSILE ATTACK FROM MUSLIMS Sandra Wernicke's dream - May 26, 2002 I find myself flying high over a city that has been completely flattened by what appears to be an explosion. There is nothing left, everything for miles is completely destroyed and disintegrated. Then I'm taken down to the ground and it's right before the explosion takes place. I'm standing in the entrance way of a mall, there are shops to my left and a public washroom to my right. People are going about their business, shopping. No one pays any attention to me, it's like they can't see me. Then all of sudden there is an explosion and the blast comes right towards me but I'm still standing. Everything and everyone in front of me is destroyed. It's like everything just burns up and disintegrates into nothing, but after I'm still standing through the whole thing. I move over to the area that used to be a bathroom and I find this string of beads and the dreams ends with me filled with hope that there is still somebody alive. Then 2 days ago, I had a vision while I was sleeping, I have had these visions happen before, this is about the 5th one so far. When it happens I get a vibrational feeling, my body starts to tingle and then it feels like its vibrating really fast back and forth, like my molecules are speeding up and going a million miles an hour, it reaches a climax then it's like a curtain is pulled away from my eyes and I see pictures. This is what I saw this time, I saw a place in the middle east , not sure but think it was Jerusalem, you could tell by the buildings and the trees and I saw something that looked like a mosque , I saw banners on buildings of leaders, like the ones you see on T.V. in Iran or Afghanistan. Then I saw men on a beach handling missiles . As I looked across the water on the other side you could see a nation or a city with skyscrapers and tall buildings and I could see some missiles already being shot off, I believe there were two , then I had the vibration feeling again and when it stopped I woke up, but it was like waking up from the deepest sleep ever. CHINESE SECRETLY INVOLVED IN ATTACK Laura Willobee's Dream I am in a classroom teaching; most of my students are young adults. We are having a great time and much learning is taking place. While I am teaching, an alarm sounds and the students tell me that we have to leave and go to another building for shelter from the attack. While we are moving to the other building, the students began to sing and chant the following: "America, America is under attack, America, America is under attack. You had no idea the attack would come from the d--- Chinese." I remember telling the students not to speak badly about any group of people. They continued to sing until we reached the building where we were supposed to find shelter. I awake from the dream. Out of the Ashes the Phoenix Will Rise Eva Brast - 6/03/08 This morning, before I woke up, I heard a voice say, "Out of the ashes the Phoenix will rise," and I saw 9/11. I saw all those buildings coming down. I saw all those ashes coming up. The ashes were billowing and the Phoenix bird (a red-looking bird) with its wings spread out was rising out of the ashes. The previous night I had listened to Did America Quake China with HAARP? I think it is a confirmation that another type of attack or another disaster is coming on America and is going to be utilized to implement the beast kingdom, to further it along. (David: We have been expecting an attack from China or her ally Russia because of the earthquake many believe came from the U.S. HAARP.) ATTACK NEAR ROCKY MOUNTAINS (PHOENIX) Priscilla Van Sutphin A friend Judy also got from the Lord, that the next attack would be somewhere near the Rockies...well Phoenix is at the basin of the southern boundaries of the Rocky Mountains. Also the Lord had said to me on 11/14... "ground zero" which is the name for the location of a nuclear incident. Then again a couple months ago in a personal word, He told me that what He does next will remove all complacency...I hoped that this would be an outpouring of His spirit... Either way...we really need to not let up on our prayer for the safety of our nation. VISION OF PHOENIX NUKED Given to Gaylene Wolmack This vision was around mid 2000. I was reading about the coming bombing of the U.S. and as I sat down in my rocker to look out my big picture window to reflect about this with the Lord, all of a sudden a laughter came forth from way down inside. I asked the Lord what was so funny about the U.S. being bombed. He then showed me a quick vision of Phoenix being bombed (I perceived it didn't matter what city) and in the midst of that there were people walking around just fine. I then saw the enemy watching via satellite and was horrified to see people walking around in the midst of what I perceived to be a nuclear bombing. Vision ended. The Lord is our high tower and our refuge and our fortress! At this time, I'm awaiting for God's direction in moving out of Phoenix. Seems I am to be in the mountains somewhere. (Editor's note: Would to God that all of the called understood and believed God's promise of protection. (Hos.4:6) My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge. God's Protection from Weapons of Mass Destruction) WHY PHOENIX? David Eells From God's perspective there is a parable here. The Greeks said the Phoenix lived for 500 years and then burned itself on a funeral pyre. (The world is known to go through 500 year cycles of peace, prosperity, pride, corruption, and then burning themselves up with war, sickness, and death.) Another Phoenix then arose from the ashes with renewed youth, strength and beauty to begin the cycle all over. (The beginning of the next cycle after the death and destruction is rebirth.) The young Phoenix then carried the remains of its father to the altar of the sun god in the Egyptian city of Heliopolis (City of the Sun). (When the new man comes to life he is strong enough to sacrifice the old man on the altar of the Son of God. He then lives in the City of the Son, the New Jerusalem. Heb.12:22 but ye are come unto mount Zion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to innumerable hosts of angels, {23} to the general assembly and church of the firstborn who are enrolled in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect.) We have come to the end of a 500 year cycle. History will repeat one more time. The pictures of the Phoenix are almost exactly like the eagle on the back of the dollar bill. Death is coming to America in order for there to be rebirth. If Phoenix or any other city in America is nuked there will be much rebirth in an awesome revival. Do not take this to mean that either God or myself will be happy with the destruction but we will be happy with the aftermath. (UPDATE: On July 2, 2002 God impressed me that for the reason at the top of this article He would delay this judgment but previous to this He gave me the following two confirmations that the warning was truly a word from Him.) I asked the Lord for a confirmation if this nuclear attack warning was a true prophecy and He gave me what I asked, 6 heads in a row. I believe it will happen. I asked for and got another confirmation from the Lord. {Isa.13:4}. . Jehovah of hosts is mustering the host for the battle. {5} They come from a far country , from the uttermost part of heaven, even Jehovah, and the weapons of his indignation, to destroy the whole land. {6} Wail ye ; for the day of Jehovah is at hand; as destruction from the Almighty shall it come. {7} Therefore shall all hands be feeble , and every heart of man shall melt : {8} and they shall be dismayed; pangs and sorrows shall take hold ; they shall be in pain as a woman in travail: they shall look in amazement one at another; their faces faces of flame . {9} Behold, the day of Jehovah cometh, cruel, with wrath and fierce anger; to make the land a desolation, and to destroy the sinners thereof out of it. The day of the Lord clearly follows the tribulation. (Note April 2005: This judgment is probably delayed until the day of the Lord as this last confirmation says.) Yesterday, 6-29-02, I was asking the Lord if He would have the terrorists caught in their plan, which would still put the needed fear of the Lord in many. He lead me to open the Word randomly and put my finger down blindly. Here is where my finger was. (2 Kings 23:11). . . he burned the chariots of the sun with fire . {12} And the altars that were on the roof of the upper chamber of Ahaz. Astounding! Here is a quote from my article above on the Phoenix. "The young Phoenix then carried the remains of its father to the altar of the sun god in the Egyptian city of Heliopolis (City of the Sun)." Doesn't sound good for Phoenix. The chariots were part of the worship of the course of the sun. The sun god, Horus, was idolized as a bird looking very much like the Phoenix, the Greek equivalent. The people of God had fallen into the worship of this replacement for the true Son God very much like today. In Isaiah's oracle against Egypt in 19:18 he spoke of the City of Destruction. Destruction here, in the original language, spelled with one "h" meant Destruction and another "h," Sun. A pun may be intended here. The City of the Sun would become The City of Destruction. Phoenix is definitely our City of the Sun. Sun City is a retirement community in Phoenix for the well to do. {Isa.26:8} Yea, in the way of thy judgments , O Jehovah, have we waited for thee ; to thy name , even to thy memorial , is the desire of our soul . {9} With my soul have I desired thee in the night; yea, with my spirit within me will I seek thee earnestly : for when thy judgments are in the earth, the inhabitants of the world learn righteousness . {10} Let favor be showed to the wicked, yet will he not learn righteousness; in the land of uprightness will he deal wrongfully, and will not behold the majesty of Jehovah. {16} Jehovah, in trouble have they visited thee ; they poured out a prayer thy chastening was upon them . These strikes against America will not cease until ultimate desolation occurs in the form of nuclear and biological attack from Russia, China, and many others. Those who have born fruit through this tribulation process will find the Lord's complete salvation in that day. {20} Come, my people, enter thou into thy chambers , and shut thy doors about thee: hide thyself for a little moment, until the indignation be overpast. {21} For, behold, Jehovah cometh forth out of his place to punish the inhabitants of the earth for their iniquity: the earth also shall disclose her blood, and shall no more cover her slain . This is "the" day of the Lord at the end of the tribulation, which is also the time when God reaps His harvest. TO THE LORD'S WATCHMAN Prophecy through Barney Fuller, 5/18/02, West Monroe, La. O Watchman what of the night, prepare ye, prepare ye, for the Day of My Indignation draweth nigh. Gather My sheep into the secret place of My Word and into a daily fellowship of prayer with Me. For, they must learn and learn quickly to abide and draw life beneath the Shadow of the Almighty. The day is upon this nation when the arm of flesh will not provide, thus My sheep must hear and obey the Voice of My Spirit. Seven times will I shake America and then her power will be broken. Then the trust that many have placed in her will vanish and their hearts will suffer great pain, fear and bewilderment. Yet, many in their great sorrow will turn to cry out unto Me. Be ready My Servants for each shaking will cause doors to open . Doors through which, you can walk and give a Word of My Spirit, in due season. Once, already have I shaken this nation and six yet remain. Prepare your hearts My Servants that you do not become distracted in these great manifestations of My Judgments. Remain close to Me and be about the work of preparing spiritual shelters for all who will come. For these shelters will be Arks of Safety, both of the spirit and of the natural. For many will come seeking Me. Be ready and prepared to receive and be a blessing unto them. Before the fall of this nation there will be heard through My Servants a Warning unlike any ever heard before. For My Servants of this hour will deliver the very Warning, which My Servant John was given to see by My Spirit on the Isle of Patmos, an Angel flying through the midst of heaven with the final everlasting message declaring in a loud voice "fear God and give glory unto Him for the Hour of Judgment has come: return and worship the One Creator of Heaven and Earth." For indeed the earth is being smitten by a most deceptive curse and the fruits of that deadly curse shall devour untold millions who refuse My outstretched Arm. Let My Servants in mighty boldness warn this nation, as well as, their families and friends. My Angels will be at your sides and will prepare the ears that are to hear. The calling of My Servants is to warn of these great and final judgments, which are poised and ready to strike this land, but not to concern yourselves over who will hear and those who will not hear. For that concern is left to the Angels that go before you. My people must quickly separate themselves from the spirit of this world and shake off the dust of its abominations and turn their whole heart and soul unto Me. Then will I receive, cleanse, strengthen and prepare them to overcome the great temptations and deceptions, which will follow on the heels of each judgment. Warn My people to flee from Babylon and drink no longer from her cup of pleasure, for indeed it is a cup of death. Time is nearing the midnight hour and My Servants must draw near unto Me that I may consecrate each one with the Boldness of My Power to sound the alarm throughout all the land. For indeed this is the day when My Presence shall be known and seen among My Elect of this hour. And this nation, as well as, the whole world will witness a final demonstration of the reality and authority of My Word. For indeed, I will thresh all nations by the Word of My Power before the end shall come. Editors Note: Friends, this prophecy from the Lord through Barney Fuller warns that God will severely chasten America "seven times" until the warnings of Revelation have been spoken to this land and then it will fall. These seven judgments are more than what we have been getting use to, like the floods, draughts, tornadoes, forest fires, anthrax attacks, planes and ships sabotaged, etc. We have had more than seven of these type judgments since this prophecy. God is speaking here of major judgments the least of which is the W.T.C. judgment. Seven times may be more than what we think too. God warned Israel (and America is very much an Israel of the Gentiles) that if they did not hearken unto His Word He would chastise them " seven times more for their sins" (Lev.26:14,18) and then if they didn't hearken He would "bring seven times more plagues upon you according to your sins" (21) and after this if they would not be reformed He would smite them "seven times for your sins" (24) and then if they still would not hearken but walked contrary to Him, "I also will chastise you seven times for your sins" (28) until He brought "the land into desolation" (32) "And you will I scatter among the nations, and I will draw out the sword after you: and your land shall be a desolation, and your cities shall be a waste" (33). Between each of these "sevens" He lists the judgments which are too numerous to repeat. Between each "seven" He gave opportunity to repent before the next "seven". God has sent to date "seven" major beasts against His people to turn them from sin; Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece, Rome, and now our revived Rome, the U.N. Since Israel entered the land in 1948 they have been in six wars and about to be "seven". God will do whatever it takes to get His elect to repent. Make it easy on yourself. Also be ready to give a scriptural answer to those who are looking for God's way of escape from judgment, repentance and faith in the promises. ISLAM EXPERT WARNS OF NUKE TERROR Claims Pakistanis smuggled 'dirty bomb' into U.S. from Canada Posted: March 20, 2002 1:00 a.m. Eastern (c)2002 WorldNetDaily.com He predicted the Sept. 11 attacks, and now Islam expert Dr. Robert Morey warns there are three small nuclear devices within the U.S. on standby for more terror, according to Assist News Service (ANS). "I have Middle Eastern friends throughout the U.S. who continually feed me information as to what the terrorists are up to," Dr. Morey told ANS. "I, in turn, feed that information to the FBI and Naval Intelligence." According to ANS, Dr. Morey first began researching Islam when he was a pastor at New Life Bible Church in central Pennsylvania during the 1980s. His research earned him a doctorate. He has authored over 40 books dealing with false religions, cults and philosophies, and founded the California Institute of Apologetics. His work has garnered him "numerous death threats" and one "clear assassination attempt last November the FBI successfully foiled." One of the Pakistani volunteers in his ministry was discovered to be a secret agent for the Pakistani Secret Service. "Hamas has me on a death list of people to assassinate in the U.S.," Morey told ANS. Morey claims a good track record with his gathered intelligence, telling ANS "I've been right so many times the FBI showed up at my house, suspicious as to whether or not I was somehow involved - because I knew too much. I simply pointed out to them they don't have their ear to the ground in the Middle Eastern community." "I told them several years ago that Muslim Pakistanis brought into the U.S. a small nuclear device called a 'dirty bomb' through Niagara Falls out of Canada," Morey says. "They are driving this nuclear device in the back of a van or a car waiting for Bin Laden to tell them when it's time to set it off." Morey received the information through Pakistani Christian sources, according to ANS. "My contacts now within the intelligence community have leaked to me it is feared there are three such devices in the U.S.," Morey added. CNN reports the Bush administration received information last October outlining a plot to smuggle a stolen Russian nuclear weapon into the United States, most likely New York City. The intelligence was deemed "not to be credible" after a polygraph test determined the informant was "bogus," one official told CNN. The perceived threat was one reason the president activated a shadow government, assigning about 100 senior officials to "bunker duty" to keep the government running in the event of a catastrophic attack. Heightened concern over al-Qaeda's progress toward obtaining a nuclear or radiological weapon, reports the Washington Post, prompted the Bush administration to deploy "hundreds of sophisticated sensors since November to U.S. borders, overseas facilities and choke points around Washington." And the Delta Force, the nation's elite commando unit, has been placed on alert to "seize control of nuclear materials that the sensors may detect." Dr. Morey points out to ANS, "One would think that if this was not a real threat, the U.S. government wouldn't rush to spend millions of dollars for equipment to protect Washington D.C." Phoenix, Arizona - The Next 911 Tom Heward Greetings in the Name of Jesus, Our ministry has been led by the Lord to send you the enclosed nineteen page document recording the dreams, visions and prophetic experiences God has granted the three (3) us over the past six (6) months. We felt that your organization has a greater capacity to reach the Christian People of America with this warning and perhaps you might be able, in some way, to assist us in our efforts to bring America back to Her Godly Roots before we see another 911. We sincerely believe we are in the Last of the Last Days as described by Jesus Christ in the Gospel of Matthew Chapters 24 and 25. For that reason we believe God is granting warning dreams and visions to all who are open and desirous of seeking the Truth that is found only in The Person of Jesus Christ. The dreams, visions and prophetic experiences we are presenting regarding the destruction of a metropolitan city in America may soon become HEADLINE NEWS. One does not have to be a prophet or have dreams and visions to come to this conclusion. Read the daily newspapers or listen to the news on radio or TV. President Bush, Donald Rumsfield or John Ashcroft will inform you of the intelligence gathering they are receiving from the CIA and the FBI. That 'Radical Islamic Terrorists' and other Enemies of This Nation are seeking to acquire (or have already acquired) WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION either chemical, nuclear or biological to use against the cities of America. Our government leaders have informed us that it is not a matter of IF but WHEN and WHERE the next terrorist attack will be launched against This Nation. We love this Nation and pray repeatedly for the Leaders of Our Nation both governmental and spiritual to be granted wisdom by Almighty God. Life in these last days has become very complex and leading has never been an easy task and is not getting any easier. We submit this information to you and only ask that you test it and ask the Lord regarding the Things we believe He has shown us. If the Spirit of Truth (The Holy Spirit) speaks to your 'inner man' that what we are hearing could be THE TRUTH REGARDING THE NEXT 911 then we ask that you do everything in your power to help us prevent such an event from taking place. If you are a governmental leader perhaps you could influence the PRESENT STATE OF READINESS in the State of Arizona and especially as it concerns the Mexican Border. If you are a spiritual leader perhaps you could share these dreams and visions with a core of intercessors who might fast and pray or if you feel the Conviction of God's Spirit you might share these things with a wider audience, as we have, that many people could get involved in Crying Out to God on behalf of America that He might 'Spare the City of Phoenix, Arizona' (or any other American City for that matter) from such a catastrophe. Thank you for your time. Sincerely in Christ, Mike Roell, Tom Heward and Richard Keltner Enclosure - 19 Page Document Entitled Phoenix, Arizona - The Next 911 PHOENIX, ARIZONA - THE NEXT 911 Greetings in the Name of Jesus, Our ministry has been led by the Lord to send you the enclosed nineteen page document recording the dreams, visions and prophetic experiences God has granted the three (3) us over the past six (6) months. We felt that your organization has a greater capacity to reach the Christian People of America with this warning and perhaps you might be able, in some way, to assist us in our efforts to bring America back to Her Godly Roots before we see another 911. We sincerely believe we are in the Last of the Last Days as described by Jesus Christ in the Gospel of Matthew Chapters 24 and 25. For that reason we believe God is granting warning dreams and visions to all who are open and desirous of seeking the Truth that is found only in The Person of Jesus Christ. The dreams, visions and prophetic experiences we are presenting regarding the destruction of a metropolitan city in America may soon become HEADLINE NEWS. One does not have to be a prophet or have dreams and visions to come to this conclusion. Read the daily newspapers or listen to the news on radio or TV. President Bush, Donald Rumsfield or John Ashcroft will inform you of the intelligence gathering they are receiving from the CIA and the FBI. That 'Radical Islamic Terrorists' and other Enemies of This Nation are seeking to acquire (or have already acquired) WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION either chemical, nuclear or biological to use against the cities of America. Our government leaders have informed us that it is not a matter of IF but WHEN and WHERE the next terrorist attack will be launched against This Nation. We love this Nation and pray repeatedly for the Leaders of Our Nation both governmental and spiritual to be granted wisdom by Almighty God. Life in these last days has become very complex and leading has never been an easy task and is not getting any easier. We submit this information to you and only ask that you test it and ask the Lord regarding the Things we believe He has shown us. If the Spirit of Truth (The Holy Spirit) speaks to your 'inner man' that what we are hearing could be THE TRUTH REGARDING THE NEXT 911 then we ask that you do everything in your power to help us prevent such an event from taking place. If you are a governmental leader perhaps you could influence the PRESENT STATE OF READINESS in the State of Arizona and especially as it concerns the Mexican Border. If you are a spiritual leader perhaps you could share these dreams and visions with a core of intercessors who might fast and pray or if you feel the Conviction of God's Spirit you might share these things with a wider audience, as we have, that many people could get involved in Crying Out to God on behalf of America that He might 'Spare the City of Phoenix, Arizona' (or any other American City for that matter) from such a catastrophe. Thank you for your time. Sincerely in Christ, Mike Roell, Tom Heward and Richard Keltner Enclosure - 19 Page Document Entitled Phoenix, Arizona - The Next 911 PHOENIX ARIZONA - THE NEXT 911 THIS MINISTRY: WHO WE ARE This ministry consists of the three (3) men (Mike Roell, Tom Heward and Rich Keltner) at varying stages of maturity in their Walk with Christ and their ability to follow the Leading of His Spirit. Tom is the most mature, he is known as 'The Intellectual One'. He was born-again at the age of 24, while attending architectural school, currently works as an architect and has been saved for thirty-two (32) years. Mike Roell is next in line of maturity. Mike works full time as an auto mechanic. Mike was born-again as a teenager and has been saved for approximately twenty (20) years. Mike is known as 'Mikeniah' or 'Iron Mike' probably because of his calling to the prophetic. Rich is the youngest in the Lord, having been born-again about three (3) years ago. Rich works full time in sales for a security alarm dealer. Rich is the 'spark' or 'doer' of the group. Rich gets a lot of dreams from the Lord and we have nicknamed him 'Jacob'. In April of 2002 we published four (4) prophetic warning dreams about the coming destruction of Phoenix, Arizona. We are basing the credibility of these dreams on a similar dream received by Rich Keltner on February 19th, 2001. In that dream Rich saw the destruction of the WORLD TRADE CENTER which took place seven (7) months later. Please read the WORLD TRADE CENTER dream and dreams 1 through 4 first, as a foundation for the additional revelation we received since they were published It is now the beginning of October 2002 and The Spirit of God has continued to speak to us for the past five (5) months about the calamity that is coming to Phoenix, Arizona. God's Spirit speaks to us through God's Word, in dreams and visions and in prophetic experiences. Since April 2002 we have received twenty (20) additional dreams, two (2) visions and numerous prophetic experiences, two (2) of which we have published in this document. We have conducted two (2) warning outreaches to the city in the past five (5) months. On our first outreach, three (3) of us flew from the East Coast to Phoenix, spending the week of May 22nd - 29th, 2002 getting the warning message to the churches and people of the city (dreams 5 -12 & prophetic experience 1 came during this outreach). On our second outreach July 1st - 22nd, 2002, 1000's of warning flyers were distributed across the Nation driving West along Route 40 from North Carolina to Phoenix and returning via Route 10 from Phoenix to New York City (dreams 17-19, vision 1 & prophetic experience 2 came during this outreach). We have conducted many 'internet chat rooms' to discuss and pray over what God has shown us. We have used e-mail to get this message to churches and ministries in America while focusing on the State of Arizona and the City of Phoenix, in particular. We are in the process of doing an electronic mailing campaign to Millions of Americans and have been led to send this document via 'Registered Mail' to some of the Larger Christian Ministries in America. Our hope is, that in getting this Warning Message before a larger audience The Spirit of God will move upon believing hearts causing people to Humble Themselves, Turn from those things that displease their Heavenly Father, Pray, Fast and Seek God on behalf of Our Nation and the City of Phoenix. Perhaps this Warning regarding THE NEXT 911 will open some spiritual eyes and ears across this land regarding the seriousness of the times we are living in and what God is saying to Our Nation about Turning Back to Him before We 'Cross the Line of No Return' and suffer irreparable damage. dream - WORLD TRADE CENTER (February 19th, 2001 - Rich Keltner) I was standing at the top of the South Tower of The World Trade Center Building and I was facing West. I was able to see everything below me and everything looked normal. Suddenly, what felt to be an earthquake coming from below, triggered explosions and rumblings. I tried to keep standing by balancing myself, it felt like being on a surfboard. I heard screaming...screaming like I have never heard before in my life. The North Tower slowly bent itself to a position where it was leaning in front of me and something stopped it. I had not fallen but it looked as if I was about to. I could see people screaming through the windows...saying, 'Help me...please, please...Help me!!!' (the screaming was something I cannot explain this message...it was terrible) The earth had stopped shaking but both buildings were swaying and unstable. I got on my knees and prayed, 'Father God, In Jesus Name, please help me out of this My God!! I do not want to die like this Dear God!! Oh Father, save me from this terrible death of falling to the ground!! My house is a mess at home! Don't let me die leaving such a mess! Amen!' As soon as I got done praying an old woman dressed in white approached a window on my left. She was walking on a platform that somehow was raised all the way to the top of the building. The screaming of many people kept roaring in the background. It sounded like thousands. Some screamed, 'Oh My God help us please...help me please!!!' The old woman walked up to some safety window that snapped open and said, 'Come!' The people screaming could see me leaving the other unstable tower and screamed even louder now. I said to her, 'What about all these screaming for their lives?' She said, 'They do not know The Father God and will die today just like you see...they will fall to the ground and nothing can save them. ' IN THE YEAR '2002' A MISSILE WILL BE USED AGAINST AMERICA dream 1 - '2002' YEAR OF THE MISSILE (December 23rd, 2001 - Tom Heward) I was working in an architectural office. Everything in this office was white. I was working on the design of a MISSILE LAUNCHING FACILITY. Someone in the office said they could get me a model of a missile on a launching pad to help me visualize the project. It was at this point in the dream that I said to myself, 'I need to tell Rich Keltner about the project I have been assigned to work on this year.' dream interpretation: About one (1) year before this dream I was assigned to work on several architectural projects in Babylon, New York: 'A Pain Clinic', 'An Addition to a Fire House' and 'A Center for Disease Control (CDC) Isolation Ward'. I believe, at that time, God was speaking to me prophetically through these projects, that 2001 was going to be a 'YEAR OF PAIN FOR AMERICA'. I shared these insights with Rich Keltner. Nine (9) months later The Twin Towers Fell, The Pentagon Was Attacked and Anthrax Was Released. 2001 became a year of pain for America. In that same sense I believe God was showing me, through this dream, that my architectural assignment (this time in a dream) to work on a Missile Launching Facility was a picture of the calamity God was fashioning as judgment against America in 2002. THE CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA AND ITS POPULATION WILL BE ANNIHILATED CAUSING AMERICA TO FALL INTO THIRD (3RD) WORLD ECONOMIC STATUS. dream 2 - CATASTROPHIC EVENT - (March 24th, 2002 - Rich Keltner) I was on the phone with my old boss from a company I worked for about six (6) years ago in the Security Industry. As I talked to him on the phone I mentioned that he should 'Get Right With God' because there was not much time left before the End of The World. As I explained this I mentioned how I had had a dream on February 19th of 2001 about the World Trade Center Falling Down and how it came to pass on September 11th of 2001. Then I added that I also had a dream that showed The United States looking like It Had Fallen into Third (3rd) World Country Status. All of a sudden he said to me 'Wait a minute, my daughter had a similar dream!' At this point in the dream I was no longer on the phone with him but in his house looking at his little girl who appeared to be about 6 or 7 years old (his daughter in real life is now about 16 years old). As I talked with him, in his house, he explained to me that 'He was not a Christian and his daughter wasn't either.' He concluded that, 'The dream she had might not be true.' I told him that it says in the Word of God, 'The Lord would pour out His Spirit in the form of dreams and visions on ALL FLESH in the End Times.'. As I explained this he said, 'My daughter's dream was showing that a CATASTROPHIC EVENT would be TAKING PLACE SOON that will drag The United States Into Third (3rd) World Country Status." I felt (in the dream) as he told me this it meant AN ENTIRE CITY WOULD BE DISAPPEARING (I could not tell if this meant there would be a 'Nuclear' or 'Chemical' Attack or Something Else). All that was clear was that A CITY WILL BE ATTACKED and that MOST OF THE PEOPLE IN THAT CITY WILL BE GONE. This event will bring the United States into total devastation.. At the end of the dream I heard, 'PHOENIX, ARIZONA'. THIS DESTRUCTION WILL BE THE OUTPOURING OF GOD'S WRATH ON THE CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA DUE TO THE WICKEDNESS OF ITS INHABITANTS dream 3 - PHOENIX OVERTHROWN (April 7th, 2002 - Tom Heward) Last night I had a brief dream while sitting in front of my computer screen and nodding off to sleep for a couple of minutes. In the dream I saw the word "PHOENIX" only the word was TURNED UPSIDE DOWN. dream interpretation: . Upon waking the Holy Spirit immediately brought to my remembrance the following Bible Verse: 2 Kings 21:13 which reads as follows: 'I will punish Jerusalem as I did Samaria as I did King Ahab of Israel and His Descendants. I will wipe Jerusalem, clean of its people, as clean as a plate that has been wiped and TURNED UPSIDE DOWN! In place of the City of Jerusalem God was showing me to substitute the City PHOENIX (the next 911), and in place of Samaria to substitute THE WORLD TRADE CENTER (the recent 911). Prior to having this dream I had gone to a home bible fellowship and during that time God spoke to me out of the Book of Jonah reminding me of my calling to Warn the American People of God's Coming Judgments. God has clearly told me that if Our Nation and the born-again Christian Church and Leaders, in particular, do not Humble Themselves and Repent, turning back to God according to 2 Chronicles 7:14 that He fully intends to Destroy America rather than Bless Her. The Spirit of God came upon me in Weeping and Mourning for our Nation, my family (who live in Phoenix) and PHOENIX, ARIZONA as I plead with God to show mercy even in HIS WRATH, asking Him not to allow the entire city and its inhabitants to be Wiped Off The Face of the Earth in a Nuclear or Chemical Attack. ISLAMIC TERRORISTS WILL BE ASSISTED BY 'COVERT NATIONS' TO OBTAIN, AND LAUNCH A TACTICAL NUCLEAR MISSILE AGAINST THE CITY OF PHOENIX dream 4 - MIKE WALLACE NEWS CAST (April 10th, 2002 - Rich Keltner) I was watching the news on TV and Mike Wallace was the newscaster. It seems that he had left CBS News and started his own show. He was announcing "INSIDE INFORMATION" he had received regarding a 'TERRORIST PLOT' to launch a 'TACTICAL NUKE' against PHOENIX, ARIZONA. He was using several colored magic markers to indicate on a map of the world, with the United States as the central focus, the various nations that were involved 'behind the scenes' in a complex scheme to assist the terrorists in carrying out their desires against the United States. dream 5 - DELIVER THE MESSAGE - (April 27th, 2002 - Mike Roell - This dream became a source of inspiration for the three of us to prepare for the next step of faith - fly to Phoenix, Arizona with this warning message) Three of us were seated on the lowered tailgate of my Nuke Truck (this is an older Dodge Ram 4x4 painted camouflage with large white stenciled letters on the side of the truck that read NUCLEAR WAR - which I have used several times to travel across the USA announcing this warning message of coming judgment). We were making preparations to travel across the country from the East Coast to the West Coast one last time before the judgment falls. Tom was seated between me and my brother reading Vincent Aquifer's Book of Prophecies, Dreams and Visions (this is a collection of Words from The Lord that this Christian Man has received since the early 90's describing in detail the reasons and ways that God The Father is going to Judge America with Severity i.e. Nuclear War while at the same time pleading with His People and The Unsaved through His Ministers to REPENT AND TURN BACK TO GOD to escape the ordained calamities) dream 6 - FOOLING AROUND (May 21st, 2002 - Mike Roell the day before my flight to Phoenix) I heard the Voice of The Lord say, "Take up your cross daily and follow Me or depart from My Kingdom!" Then I saw a number of Christians playing with a 'Milton-Bradley' Game, which had all kinds of bells and whistles and loop-de-loops, and I said to myself, "What a waste of time." Then I looked off in the distance and saw The Four Horsemen of The Apocalypse coming out of the ground in an almost 'Holographic' type of image. dream interpretation: We are living in serious times, which is in marked contrast to the very 'unserious' attitudes of many Christians claiming to be "Followers of Christ". The road to life is narrow and hard, especially as we approach the End of This Age. God is requiring those who claim to be His Followers to "live it or leave it" i.e. the road to discipleship. Many in His Kingdom are just playing games (as indicated by the 'Milton-Bradley' Game) while serious judgments are about to be released upon the Earth. The Nuclear Annihilation of Phoenix, Arizona would be one such Apocalyptic Event and a Christian who is fooling around, while claiming to be a "Follower of Christ' will position themselves for destruction rather than salvation as the clock ticks down in the closing hours of This World. dream 7 - WATER A PRECIOUS COMMODITY (May 22nd, 2002 - Tom Heward while napping on my flight from the East Coast to Phoenix) I saw 'stacked' five (5) gallon bottles of drinking water and I believe I was being shown two things: A 'fast' by a considerable number of God's People would be required to 'delay' this destruction, however, should God's People chose not to 'fast' then destruction would come and water will become a precious commodity. dream 8 - PHOENIX, ARIZONA - THE NEXT 911 (May 23rd, 2002 - Tom Heward on the 2nd day of our outreach warning to the churches and people in Phoenix, Arizona about coming judgment) I saw a poster board sign with the following stenciled lettering 'PHOENIX, ARIZONA - THE NEXT 911'. God was confirming the wording for the signs we were fabricating as well as the nature of the coming judgment. dream 9 - POLICE PRESENCE (May 24th, 2002 - Mike Roell on the 3rd day of our warning outreach to Phoenix) I saw several police cars in a 'huddle' and officers were standing outside their squad cars discussing the 'people' who were distributing leaflets regarding a Terrorist Plot to Destroy the City of Phoenix. They were quite disturbed and determined to catch whoever was responsible for distributing this literature. I had several dreams along this line for 2 or 3 nights in a row when we first arrived in the city . dream 10 - TELL THEM, TELL THEM, TELL THEM! (May 24th, 2002 - Mike Roell in Phoenix) The Lord was telling me, "Tell everyone, tell anyone who will listen. Tell them during the day, tell them while they are working, tell them at night. Tell them during the week and on the weekend. Tell them through the media; tell them, on the Internet. Use every means and every way possible to get out the message regarding the coming nuclear terrorist attack on Phoenix, Arizona!" dream 11 - PHOENIX, ARIZONA IS GONE! (May 25th, 2002 - Mike Roell 4th day of our warning outreach) The destruction of Phoenix, Arizona had already taken place and we were being questioned about the incident because we had published information prior to it happening. prophetic experience 1 - BLIND MAN, SPORTS COLISEUM, DAVE ROEVER & SEEING EYE DOGS (May 26th, 2002 - Mike Roell & Tom Heward on the 5th day of our warning outreach) Friday and Saturday we saturated the malls, movie theatres and shopping centers with warning flyers. Late Sunday Morning we came across a large fundamentalist teaching church in the heart of Phoenix just letting out from the early morning service. There were hundreds of families and singles moving from building to building and church auditorium to parking lot. We took action, greeting as many people as possible, while handing out flyers and putting them on cars. Considering the radical and targeted content of the flyers and these peoples willingness to read them, we were really quite stunned with the people's reaction. They seemed to pay no attention to our efforts to warn while treating the flyers like you would A WORTHLESS COUPON FOR A .25-CENT REDUCTION ON A CASE OF COKE. We were disappointed but as we drove down the boulevard leaving the church behind; walking past the church in plain view was a BLIND MAN. God was telling us like he told the prophets of old - Isaiah, Jeremiah and Ezekiel, 'None is so blind as My Own People,' says the Lord. Next, with no prior knowledge of the event, we ran into thousands of Phoenix sports fans flocking to their new SPORTS COLISEUM to watch the Diamondbacks. Our flyers used the title of the upcoming Hollywood release 'Sum Of All Fears' to warn of the things God had shown us in dreams that were coming to Phoenix. How coordinated of God that He would have us giving these warning pamphlets to folks about to attend a Sports Stadium while at the time we were unaware that the script of the upcoming movie featured a sports coliseum as the primary target for a nuclear terrorist attack. Finally we went to one of the largest Charismatic Churches in the Valley. We arrived there late in the afternoon and no one was around but a 'HUMAN BEAN' as the youthful disciples of this congregation are called. He informed us that DAVE ROEVER (http://www.interplaza.com/roever/SCARRED.htm) had been the guest speaker in the morning service and would be returning in the evening. This was a large congregation of believers (perhaps 10,000) who were familiar with the Gifts of The Holy Spirit to include dreams, visions and prophetic utterance so we were excited about the opportunity to inform them of what God was showing us about Phoenix. That evening on the way to the service, while we were praying about whether or not we should share this message with the leadership, I felt the Holy Spirit told me NO. I believe The Spirit was saying we would be misunderstood and then shut down through the influence of the leaderships' ties with local officials and because we were not a nationally known ministry. We decided instead to blanket the parking lot under cover of night and allow the members of the congregation to decide for themselves if this message was from the Lord or not. I believe the greatest confirmation regarding this warning message was uniquely embodied in the person of DAVE ROEVER the guest speaker and his timely appearance during our outreach. Dave was horribly burned over 90% of his body, when his own phosphorus grenade exploded in his hand while serving in the Vietnam Conflict. For almost 40 years he has suffered the trauma that comes with continual skin grafts not to mention the difficulty of dealing with the physical deformities that attend this type of burn case. His faith in Christ has allowed him to triumph. But God was using DAVE ROEVER as confirmation of the horrible judgments that He has been showing us that are stored up for God's disobedient sons and daughters and the unsaved currently living in Phoenix, Arizona. God is both kind and severe (Romans Chapter 11) and our Nation has experienced the kindness of God in abundance but His people have taken advantage of His grace and turned it into lasciviousness exemplified by the lifestyles of large number of the Christians currently living in Phoenix, Arizona. I listened to Dave joke around with the leadership and the congregation talking about the healing message and prosperity and new hope for marriages and backslidden teens but deep inside the weeping and groaning of the Spirit as to the Blindness of God's People were further confirmed as we left the building and saw another blind person in the middle of the church foyer with a SEEING EYE DOG. Again God was saying, 'They are unwilling to see their Wretched State before Me, and because of this they REFUSE TO REPENT,' leaving God with no choice but the severity of judgment. Please pray for Phoenix, my children and closest relatives are among those I am talking about and I love them dearly regardless of their current feelings toward me or their relationship with God. dream 12 - SEXUAL IMPS (May 27th, 2002 - Tom Heward and Mike Roell on the sixth (6) day of our warning outreach to Phoenix) From the time we arrived in Phoenix till the day we left the City one thing stood out to all three (3) of us. This was a city filled with men and women obsessed with beauty, pleasure and the opposite sex. From teenagers to grandmas everyone was 'On The Make.' As they say in the movies 'Sodom and Gomorrah' has just had an UPGRADE. On my third night in the city God gave me a warning dream in which I saw sexual devils possessing young girls and women in such a way as to break down the strongest of moral resolutions in any man single, married or neutral. About two days later Mike had a similar warning dream in which he saw himself being tempted and placed in compromising situations by unprincipled women much like Joseph who was continually tempted by Potipher's Wife in the Biblical Account of Genesis. We knew for certain that this was one of the main reasons God was demanding the people of this City either TURN OR BURN!!! dream 13 - WORSE THAN HIROSHIMA OR NAGASAKI! (June 4th, 2002 - Tom Heward one week after our warning outreach to Phoenix) I became aware in this dream that what was coming to Phoenix, Arizona was beyond anything that had happened in history, regarding a nuclear detonation in a heavily populated area. (The current population of Phoenix, Arizona including all suburban neighborhoods within a 30 mile radius of city, center is 2,932,843) This dream seemed to convey the horror of millions of people killed or injured. Not thousands or even hundreds of thousands but a devastation encompassing an initial blast area of 25 to 30 miles in diameter. In the dream I was SCREAMING, literally SCREAMING for people to "GET OUT OF THE CITY!" because I knew it was coming. I then found myself in a high school and I was SCREAMING at the students, "GET OUT OF THE CITY AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE!" In the final portion of this dream I was aware that THE DEVASTATION had already taken place and the horror of it all was beyond anyone's imagination. Upon awaking I knew this incident would have repercussions throughout The Nation that no one could understand or comprehend. dream 14 - PHOENIX "UPDATE" (June 5th, 2002 - Mike Roell one week after the Phoenix Outreach) I was in Upstate New York and I was speaking to a young man who was a Muslim. He was asking me, "Am I going to be O.K. with all these troublous times coming?" He wanted to know if he was right with God. I said, "No, you're not going to make it, you're not right with God, you're not right with Jesus Christ." As I was speaking to this man a whole bunch of young people gathered around me and they wanted to hear what I had to say. Then I started telling them about America's Destruction and about being in the Last Days and all the Calamities about to come upon Us. Then an older woman came over to me and asked, "Are you the same guy that was talking about destruction and naming all the cities like New York?" And I said, "Yes, New York, California, Las Vegas and Florida." Then I said, "I have an UPDATE for you and here is the latest one, PHOENIX, ARIZONA." I said, "PHOENIX IS GONNA GET NUKED!" dream 15 - DISPATCH TO MESA (June 12th, 2002 - Tom Heward) The title of this short dream is the entire dream. I was sitting in my chair at home while reading The Word of God and fell asleep for a short period of time and heard and/or saw the words 'DISPATCH TO MESA'. dream interpretation: DISPATCH is a word associated with the sending out of freight, particularly via truck transport. A dispatcher is one whose job is to direct and schedule the transporting of specific goods in order that those goods arrive at a specific time and in a specific place as planned. We stayed at a motel in Mesa, Arizona, a suburb of Phoenix, on our first warning outreach to the city. On my last day at the motel I saw a medium sized rental truck in the parking lot and on the side of the truck were the words ACCURATE DELIVERY SERVICE. At the time, I sensed in my spirit, that perhaps this was another sign from the Lord that the terrorists will DISPATCH a nuclear weapon to Mesa via truck transport. This dream regarding a DISPATCH TO MESA is probably an indication that 'not only will a tactical nuke be used against Phoenix (as the majority of dreams have indicated) but a transported nuclear device as well.' This would not be unlike the 'modus operandi' of Al Qaeda who used multiple strikes against the same or similar targets on a single day, as happened on September 11th, 2001. dream 16 - SUDDENLY, IN ONE DAY! LOSS OF CHILDREN AND WIDOWHOOD! (June 12th, 2002 - Rich Keltner two weeks after the first warning outreach to Phoenix) scene 1 The three of us (Tom, Mike and I) were in a Taxi Cab in Bay shore, New York. Tom was driving the cab. I was sitting to the right and Mike was in the back seat. Tom had a clipboard and was going over the standard cab routine checklist. Tom asked me, "What's the number of this cab?" I answered, "This is cab number 11." Tom replied, "You've got to be kidding!" scene 2 All three of us were in a desert area and it appeared to be a place where there had been great destruction. A single two-story house remained standing and Tom had gone to the front door to investigate. As he opened the door there was a deathly silence that permeated the atmosphere and the only sound that could be heard was the low rumble of a fan. Tom saw two older teenagers, a boy and a girl, lying on their backs on the floor in one corner of the room. Both appeared to be holding some type of denim cloth over their faces in an effort to filter the air they were breathing. Tom's brother Jeff (who is currently residing with his son in Gilbert, a suburb of Phoenix) was lying face down on a bed in the same room. All the hair on Jeff's head was gone and he was also covering his face with a cloth. There was the lingering sense of death in the room, the source of which appeared to be the 'foreign substance' that hung in the atmosphere of the room. At first Jeff did not recognize his brother Tom but when he did he immediately broke down with great sobs and crying. Mike and I had entered the room at this point and were observing. Tom asked both of us to leave the room so he could speak privately with his brother, who was totally devastated by what had happened. scene 3 I was on 'Fire Island', off the Coast of Long Island and was walking up a steep hill. Ben was in front of me and Ben's sister-in-law was walking in front of him. Ben was pleading, "THE BLOOD OF JESUS OVER WINTER!" in order to protect his sister-in-law who had recently become a WIDOW, due to the death of her husband who had left her a sizeable inheritance. There was a 'Marilyn Manson Head Banger' walking with them and mocking the Gospel of Jesus Christ. I said to him, "I used to be just like you but God saved me despite my mockery of Him." Dark storm clouds were forming over 'Fire Island' and I was becoming anxious about whether or not I would be able to get to my boat and launch it from the beach or a slip to cross the channel to safety. dream interpretation: scene 1 At the particular time of this dream I was temporarily employed with David's Cab Company in Bay shore, Long Island and all the cabs are white. The white cab stands for the ministry the three of us are called to and God's requirement that we conduct our lives to be Holy even as He is Holy. David's Cab identifies us with the Ministry of David Wilkerson, located in Times Square, which has been raised up by the Lord to Warn America of God's Impending Judgments and the need for repentance in accordance with 2 Chronicles 7:14. The cab being number 11 stands for the Judgment that came upon the Twin Towers on 9-11 and sets the stage for this prophetic dream. God is preparing another judgment for America or the NEXT 911. Tom was driving the cab because God's Holy Spirit is driving him to head up this warning message to Phoenix, Arizona. scene 2 The desert area is Phoenix, Arizona and the great destruction is the coming Nuclear Terrorist Attack on that City. The two older teens, a boy and a girl, are Tom's children who currently attend Scottsdale Community College in Phoenix. All three (Tom's brother Jeff and Tom's two children) were dying from radioactive particles released after the attack. Jeff did not recognize his brother Tom, because Jeff, like Tom's two children refuses to believe this event is going to happen. Only after it has happened does Jeff recognize his brother (recognize his brother's prophetic calling to warn of impending judgment) and breaks down crying for the sorrow he is experiencing for not believing. scene 3 'Fire Island' is the Entertainment Seashore of Long Island and has the reputation for being a center for radical homosexual indulgences, and the abandonment to sensual pleasures of every kind. Phoenix, Arizona with its surrounding suburbs is a desert city separated from other 'metropolitan' cities and suburbs in America which will become an "ISLAND OF FIRE" (this is a play-on-words as is often found in spiritual dreams and their interpretation) when this destruction comes because of the wickedness of its inhabitants. Phoenix will become a place where multitudes will be maimed and destroyed. Ben is a street preacher from New York and he is pleading "THE BLOOD OF JESUS OVER WINTER!" because in the aftermath of this attack a "LIMITED NUCLEAR WINTER" will ensue dispersing clouds of deathly radioactive dust particles further sickening and annihilating the inhabitants of Phoenix. Ben's sister-in-law, who's husband recently died, is now a WIDOW and the 'Marilyn Manson Head Banger' stands for the CHILDREN OF OUR NATION having become Mockers of The Gospel of Jesus Christ. The Spirit of God 'quickened' Isaiah 47:9 to me when I awoke from this dream showing me that the Judgment that is coming to Phoenix, Arizona will be a partial fulfillment or a PRELUDE to the Judgments God is bringing on Our Nation. All of Chapter 47 of Isaiah is a 'dual prophecy' applying to Babylon of Old and Mystery Babylon (America of today) of Chapter 18 of the Book of Revelation. Verse 9 of Isaiah Chapter 47 states, "BUT THESE TWO THINGS SHALL COME UPON YOU SUDDENLY IN ONE DAY: LOSS OF CHILDREN AND WIDOWHOOD. THEY SHALL COME ON YOU IN FULL MEASURE IN SPITE OF YOUR MANY SORCERIES, IN SPITE OF THE GREAT POWER OF YOUR SPELLS." The dark storm clouds forming over 'Fire Island' and Rich's desire to find a boat to depart to safety by 'getting across to the other side' illustrate THE HORROR THAT PHOENIX, ARIZONA WILL BECOME due to the after-math of this attack. Multitudes of burn victims and those contaminated with radioactive particles will not be allowed to leave the areas of contamination, whereas those desiring to aid the victims will 'voluntarily' distance themselves for fear of the hideous sicknesses and genetic mutations (passed on to future generations as exemplified by the Chernobyl Incident) associated with radioactive contamination. Phoenix, Arizona and its outlying suburbs will become a burned-out radioactively contaminated wasteland vision 1 - BRIGHT ORANGE FIREBALL (July 8th, 2002 - Mike Roell I had this vision of nuclear destruction while I was in New York praying with Rich and Ben about Phoenix, Arizona) The first thing I saw was a BRIGHT ORANGE FIREBALL that literally engulfed the city. Then I saw a thunderous wave of destruction moving outward in a circular motion from the initial fireball that destroyed everything in its path. It continued to roll outward in a circular pattern leaving a path of devastation as far as the eye could see. The proportions of the initial fireball and blast that followed left nothing standing for miles. The next day, I phoned Tom, who had just arrived in Phoenix on his 2nd outreach to warn the city. Little did I know, that at the exact time I phoned Tom and told him of the vision God had given me regarding the magnitude of the coming nuclear attack, that Tom would be driving through the midst of Phoenix with the following question on his mind, "Lord this is a vast city and suburban area, just how large will this nuclear attack be?" Then, less than a half hour after I told Tom my vision, the City of Phoenix was struck with a Giant Dust Storm. The headlines in 'The Arizona Republic' on the following day best describe what Tom was experiencing first hand as he drove through the city, 'A giant dust storm emerged from the East Tuesday, kicking up wind gusts of 60 mph as it tore through the Valley, knocking down power poles, uprooting trees and creating havoc for drivers and pilots for whom visibility was reduced to almost zero.' God had provided Tom with an immediate answer to the question on his mind about the magnitude of the coming nuclear attack in the form of 'The Vision' I had shared with him on the phone and the 'Giant Dust Storm' which he was experiencing 'first hand' as he cautiously pulled into A McDonalds due to reduced visibility. Keep in mind, it had been less than a week since the largest fires in the History of Arizona were burning out-of-control just 100 miles Northeast of Phoenix displacing 10's of 1000's of residents. And this 'FIRESTORM' on the outskirts of Phoenix (affording the people a glimpse of the kind of FIRESTORMS associated in a nuclear explosion) came only a month after we had conducted our 1st Warning Outreach to the City. God is speaking and God is warning this City through the dreams and visions which He has directed us to publish and proclaim. He is backing our 'faith to warn' by causing unusually harsh weather conditions coupled with the foolish acts of men thereby loosing unprecedented havoc on the surrounding area. God Almighty is working together with this ministry in pleading with the Citizens of Phoenix to REPENT OF THEIR GODLESS BEHAVIOR in order that GOD CAN REPENT OF HIS PLANS TO BRING CALAMITY ON PHOENIX. God is warning, but as David Wilkerson often says, 'WHO IS LISTENING?' dream 17 - NOT IN HIS RIGHT MIND (July 11th, 2002 - Mike Roell I had this dream while in New York and immediately called Tom the following morning. Tom had just arrived in Phoenix with full intentions of finding an architectural job, looking for an apartment and then taking a more permanent ministry stance and warning outreach to the City of Phoenix. He intended to do this until such time as God clearly told him to pack his bags and leave.) I was seated at one end of a long banquet table. Seated across from me was a man who was NOT IN HIS RIGHT MIND, this man was mentally unstable, like someone you might visit at a State Psyche Ward. The Presence of The Lord was standing over both of us (myself and this mental patient) and the Lord was telling me that He wanted me to learn a lesson from observing this man and his behavior, that lesson being How To Avoid Getting Oneself Into Trouble. The Lord proceeded to tell me, 'This man has decided on a course of action which is going to jeopardize his life.' Then I noticed that Tom was at the extreme opposite end of this long banquet table and I called to him and invited him to join me, this mental patient and the Lord as it seemed that the Lord wanted Tom to benefit from this lesson as well. Tom then shouted back to me, 'Hey, I don't need to hear anything like that, I'm just fine where I am!' dream interpretation: Of course, the man who is NOT IN HIS RIGHT MIND is Tom. He is NOT IN HIS RIGHT MIND because God had not clearly directed Tom to go to Phoenix, Arizona a 2nd time much less go to there, secure an architectural job, rent an apartment and begin an outreach ministry. A multitude of unusually difficult obstacles had confronted Tom from the time he left the East Coast to travel to Phoenix but his determination and pride to be GOD'S WATCHMAN, STANDING IN THE GAP FOR PHOENIX kept him moving in what he believed to be God's Will for his life. Had it not been for this dream and Tom's sensitivity to this form of guidance by the Holy Spirit he would probably have remained in Phoenix to this day. It took a major rebuke, in the form of a dream, from the lips of a fellow minister to warn him and turn him back from a course of action that would jeopardize his life. As I was telling Tom this dream he was sitting in his van gazing out at Route 101 which bisects the city of Phoenix running North and South, when two tractor trailers passed in front of him and each had the word PRIDE emblazoned on the side of their trailers. He then realized that God was speaking to him through this dream and confirming that it was PRIDE and not the wisdom of God that had motivated him to move to Phoenix a 2nd time. He thanked me for the dream and believed it was God's Will for him to return immediately to the East Coast and said that he expected God would give additional confirmation to this major change in plans. prophetic experience 2 - TWO MISSILES & GET OUT (July 13th, 2002 - Tom Heward} The following morning, having slept in my Van in the parking lot of a Country Kitchen Truck Stop just outside Phoenix Proper. I went into the store to pick up a few personal items. There was a sample movie playing on one of the VCR/TV combo's for sale and the unit was located just above the items I was wanting to purchase. The sample video caught my attention - as a man and woman who were in a computer room were punching buttons with a fury. Seems there were two (2) incoming tactical nukes launched from the ocean headed for their city and they were trying to alter the path of the missiles. As in most Hollywood flicks they accomplished their goal but I was 'Getting The Picture'. Next I drove to Dunkin Donuts to get some coffee and a bagel. As I stood behind a woman waiting to order, one of the customers in front of me casually tossed a paper on the counter directly in my line of sight. The headlines of the paper read 'GET OUT' and then I saw on the same paper right below that heading 'ARIZONA'. I did a 'double take' and picked up three copies to remind myself how the Spirit was speaking to me. O.K., O.K., I get the picture, You (God) want me 'ATTA HERE!'. Later when I recovered my wits and looked more closely at the paper I realized it was local advertising encouraging the People of Phoenix, ARIZONA to GET OUT and party featuring all the hottest dance clubs, where the booze runs free and sexual desires are served up on a silver platter. dream 18 - GRINDING THEIR TEETH (July 14th, 2002 - Mike Roell I had this dream while in New York. I called Tom as he was preparing to leave Phoenix after he had preached on the streets and passed out 1000's of additional warning leaflets) Tom was standing before a large gathering of people in Phoenix and he was weeping as he told them of the horrible judgments God was about to release upon their city because they were unwilling to repent. The people listened for a while and then their anger with Tom began to grow until they were GRINDING THEIR TEETH against him with a hatred and anger that could be both seen and felt. dream 19 - IN MEMORIAM (July 21st, 2002 - Tom Heward two days after having returned to the East Coast following my 2nd trip to Phoenix, Arizona) I was looking down at a 'Bird's Eye View' of the entire City of Phoenix, Arizona along with its surrounding suburbs. Every house, every building, all vegetation, trees and life had been leveled to NOTHINGNESS. I saw the partial remains of a single office building jutting up in the barren landscape as well as the foundations of some residential structures. The area that depicted Phoenix Proper along with the Suburbs of Phoenix, i.e. Mesa, Tempe, Scottsdale, Glendale, Sun City etc. had various colors superimposed on their individual boundaries much like you would see on a 'color coded zoning map' making it quite clear that the destruction had been utter and complete. Then, almost instantly the entire scene shrunk and condensed itself into an image of the devastated city and surrounding suburbs engraved on a Pewter Plaque with the plaque mounted on a stone pedestal and the following wording engraved on the pedestal - "IN MEMORIAM OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA DESTROYED OCTOBER 2002" Next I found myself viewing a scaled down replica of the devastated city and surrounding suburbs obviously built as a tourist attraction. The strange thing about this 'replica city' is that it was in the shape of a pizza and the entrance to this tourist attraction was by driving under a single elevated slice of pizza. dream interpretation: In case you have not noticed by this time, I have a lot at stake in this warning message to Phoenix, Arizona. The vast majority of my family has lived and continues to live in Phoenix, Arizona and its surrounding suburbs. Both my mother and father retired and then 'passed away' in the late 80's while living in Del Web's Retirement Community of Sun City, Arizona. My brother, Jeff (age 53) and his son Brett (age 19), both unsaved, currently live in Glendale, Arizona. My daughter, Danielle (age 20), who came to know Christ at a young age and is currently living a 'nominal Christian life', resides and works in Scottsdale, Arizona while attending a community college. My son Nicholas (age 19), who also came to know Christ at a young age, currently stands on 'a shaky foundation', attends college, parks cars at a 'speak-easy' and plays guitar while residing in Scottsdale. My wife Colleen who was saved at the age of 30 from a life of drugs and alcohol (then discipled at one of David Wilkerson's 'Teen Challenge Programs' while living in Hawaii) has a calling to full time ministry as an evangelist and prophetess. My understanding is that she recently moved to Phoenix, Arizona in spite of my warnings and heartfelt requests that she have my children move Out of Phoenix and return to living with her in California. My family has relegated me to a 'nut case' and has rejected any and all things I speak or warn them about regarding the things of God. My wife's daughter from a former marriage (before Colleen was saved and then married me) and who is a Christian and married to a Christian lawyer, financially secure with four (4) young children and currently lives in Scottsdale whose husband has threatened to have me restrained, sued and jailed if I continue to communicate these dreams and warnings to my immediate family. If and when this event comes to pass in the way we have seen it in dreams and visions then MY FAMILY COULD BE VAPORIZED IN LESS THAN A MONTH. It was a 'color coded map' we used on our first warning outreach to Phoenix, Arizona for the week of May 22nd -29th, 2002. The churches and citizens of Phoenix rejected this warning with mockery, hatred and scorn. Had these warning dreams come to us as a result of CONSUMING TOO MUCH PIZZA than this is all a big joke and we can sit back and have a chuckle. But it is our sincere conviction that these dreams came to us from The Holy Spirit and with this revelation comes an even greater responsibility to communicate the message with a compelling sense of urgency. For it is not me or Mike or Rich who are being mocked when we share these revelations, sincerely desiring people to give heed. Rather it is the God of The Heavens and The Earth Whom people are mocking when these messages are received with utter scorn and contempt. Even as we mapped out our efforts to effectively distribute the warning leaflets to a broad majority of the Churches and Citizens of Phoenix and the surrounding suburbs with the message being scorned, ignored, rejected and mocked. So God, as this dream portrays, has targeted the total annihilation of Phoenix Proper along with the surrounding 'color-coded' suburban areas. God used us to target them for warning unto salvation but because they rejected His message now He is using this dream to reveal those same areas have been targeted for total annihilation. The plaque was 'Set In Stone' and God is saying through this illustration that the Destruction is Unalterable, Permanent i.e. SET IN STONE. Prayer could diminish it, fasting could delay it, but it will take REPENTANCE to change the Mind of God regarding the destruction He has Ordained for Phoenix. Based on the outreaches, the messages, the internet sessions and responses we have received so far, I would have to honestly say that no one is taking this threat AS BEING FROM GOD and only a handful of people, beyond the three of us ARE TAKING THESE DREAMS AND VISIONS SERIOUSLY. That being the case, and the protection of our cities being wholly dependent upon God watching over them (Psalms 127:1b), what is to prevent the Islamic Terrorists from carrying out their threats of destroying any city in this Nation using weapons of mass destruction? Our Nation has abandoned God, as evidenced by the fruit it is bearing, so God is abandoning Our Nation until such time as We the People of this Nation Turn Back to Him and reinstate our submission to Him which will be evidenced by the fruit we bear. Until that happens we will see what is going to happen in Phoenix, Arizona repeated throughout our Nation over and over until the lessons are learned. The Pizza Memorial at the end of the dream seems to be a bit of sarcasm on God's part in to disarm the mockers and their mockery aimed at our attempts to deliver this message with seriousness and sincerity. We continually hear things like 'YOU GUYS NEED TO LAY OFF THE LATE NIGHT PIZZA!', to keep from having so many foolish dreams of Doom and Gloom. How appropriate that there is currently a pizza on the market that fits the Arizona Design Motif and uses both a DESERT SCENE AND CACTUS as trademark. Namely, 'TOMBSTONE PIZZA.' Perhaps God is saying to the mockers and unbelievers who refuse to take this ministry or our dreams seriously 'JUST WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE ON YOUR TOMBSTONE?' dream 20 - "DRIVE-BY" STARRING MICHAEL DOUGLAS (August 5th, 2002 - Rich Keltner) I was on the phone with Tom and I was telling him about a new movie that had just been released. It was called DRIVE-BY starring Michael Douglas and it was a movie about A NUCLEAR ATTACK ON PHOENIX. Tom replied, "Are you serious?" Then I saw a car with a window rolled down DRIVING-BY Phoenix and the CITY WAS DEVASTATED. dream interpretation: Tom and I have often made the comment that "Hollywood seems more prophetic than the Church." There are several movies that have been released by Hollywood recently that seem to give this statement credibility. Remember the movie "Wag the Dog". It was released at about the same time Clinton was having trouble with the Lewinsky Scandal and he was trying to focus The American People's attention on our responsibilities to deal with a potential war crisis. That movie dealt with a similar scenario and was released in such a timely manner as to believe that there must be Prophets in Hollywood. Then there was the movie "Collateral Damage" about a terrorist attack in an American City and a fireman's loss of his family and desire to get revenge. That movie was due for release just after the Twin Towers were attacked and it was rescheduled for release at a later time because of the sensitivity of the subject matter. Once again, Hollywood's Prophets seemed to be more clued into America's Future than the Church. Most recently "The Sum of All Fears" was released on the 31st of May 2002 scripting a nuclear terrorist attack on a Sports Stadium in Boston, Mass. just two days after the three of us had completed a one-week outreach to Phoenix, Arizona (May 22-29th, 2002) passing out 1000's of warning leaflets to the churches and citizens and especially the crowds attending the Diamondbacks New Sports Stadium in Phoenix. In that outreach we were telling people that Phoenix, Arizona would be the NEXT 911 and it would be NUCLEAR. So, what am I saying? I believe God is saying through this dream, that although there may never be a movie come out of Hollywood called DRIVE-BY starring Michael Douglas that this dream is setting forth a scenario that has been true in at least two nationally significant events - The Lewinsky Scandal and The Twin Towers and God is saying through this dream "Get Ready People - Phoenix, Arizona is about to experience 'THE SUM OF ALL FEARS' - A Nuclear Terrorist Attack." Michael Douglas being the star in this movie is a clue as to WHY Phoenix, Arizona will experience the outpouring of God's Wrath. Michael Douglas has starred in numerous recent Hollywood releases, many of which glorify the sins of America, i.e. 'Traffic' - about drugs, drug dealers and their victims, 'Fatal Attraction' - about adultery and sexual unfaithfulness in marriage, 'Wall Street' - about personal greed, and selfish ambition, 'Basic Instinct' - about sexual looseness and obsession with the opposite sex. Phoenix, Arizona is rampant with the sins of America as portrayed by Michael Douglas. The vast majority of God's People in Phoenix turn a 'Blind Eye' to the sins in their midst in order to pursue Their American Dream. God is calling the churches in Phoenix (as well as the entire nation) to Accountability, to Humility, To Sackcloth and Ashes, to Repentance and Out of Complacency - and if they will not listen then neither will God intervene to prevent these terrorists from carrying out their threats of using weapons of mass destruction against the cities of America. Finally a DRIVE-BY is the current slang term for a shooting or killing performed between rival gangs in the cities of our nation where several gang members DRIVE-BY in their car with the window rolled down and gun down a rival gang member often taking the life of an innocent child or adult in the process. Likewise, America is not involved in an all-out-war where the enemy is easily identified and eliminated but is rather dealing with terrorist organizations that can acquire weapons of mass destruction, either nuclear, chemical or biological. The enemy can literally DRIVE-BY Phoenix, Arizona (almost as easily as a rival gang would DRIVE-BY a human target) and launch a CRUISE MISSILE (or its land-based equivalent) and initiate A NUCLEAR ATTACK ON PHOENIX not only killing the Michael Douglas's of Phoenix but innocent children as well. dream 21 - FLATTERIES (August 9th, 2002 - Rich Keltner) I was explaining to Tom a scripture verse from the King James Version of The Bible that God had given me concerning his daughter Danielle. I knew it was important for me to tell Tom that this verse was specifically from THE KING JAMES VERSION OF THE BIBLE even though I knew he does not believe 'that particular version of the Bible' to be any more valid than other equally good translations. This verse was from the Book of Daniel, Chapter 11, Verse 34 and reads as follows: "Now when they shall fall, they shall be holpen with a little help: but many shall cleave to them with flatteries. God was telling me and I was telling Tom that his daughter Danielle was not heeding the warnings he had given her about Leaving Phoenix because others, whom Danielle believed to be 'More Spiritually Mature Than Her Father' were comforting her with counsel contrary to her dad's warnings to leave Phoenix. God told me that others were telling his daughter 'FLATTERIES', and saying that SHE HAD NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT: PHOENIX, ARIZONA WAS NOT GOING TO BE DESTROYED IN A NUCLEAR TERRORIST ATTACK AND THAT SHE SHOULD CONTINUE PURSUING HER COLLEGE STUDIES, HER WORK AND HER CAREER SINCE THEY, NOR ANYONE THEY KNEW OF, WAS RECEIVING ANYTHING FROM GOD ALONG THESE LINES REGARDING A TERRORIST ATTACK ON PHOENIX, ARIZONA. dream interpretation: Danielle (age 20) is Tom's daughter and her name is based on the feminine derivative of the male name 'Daniel' which is the Book of the Bible this dream refers to. The Book of Daniel has many dreams concerning The End Times. The Book of Daniel has much to say about the value and importance of dreams. The author of this Book, Daniel, received the gift of dreams and interpretation from God. Tom's daughter 'Danielle' also received the gift of dreams and interpretation when she was a young child. Danielle was the only person in Tom's immediate family who had a dream about him coming to Phoenix just two weeks before he and his ministry team, arrived unannounced, to bring this warning message to the city. The emphasis on THE KING JAMES BIBLE in this dream is referring to Tom's pastor/worship-leader/Assembly-Of-God brother-in-law whose first name is JAMES and who is the person responsible for DOLING OUT FLATTERIES to Tom's daughter Danielle and causing her to believe the lie, that 'Everything will be Just Fine in Phoenix. dream 22 - COVENANT (August 10th, 2002 - Tom Heward) I was in a room with a man who had once been a good Christian friend of mine when I lived in Tulsa, Oklahoma. His name was Gordon. Gordon took me to a room, which appeared to be in the basement of a church complex, and pulled back the curtain to another room. In this room I saw my wife Colleen (we have been legally separated since 1992) and she was sitting at a student desk, the kind with a small writing surface on one side. She appeared composed yet listening to whatever matters were being presented. There was nothing unusual regarding her appearance or what she was doing. In the next part of the dream I was being instructed (by the Lord) to take all the dreams, visions and prophetic experiences regarding A NUCLEAR TERRORIST ATTACK ON PHOENIX, ARIZONA and write them down in a way that would cause them to become a legally binding contract. I was being told to write these dreams and visions on a piece of paper, have them recorded, validated, stamped and notarized in order that they might convey the weight of a Title Deed to A Parcel of Land or function in a U.S. Court of Law as a legally binding contract or covenant. dream interpretation: The key to understanding this dream is in understanding the word COVENANT. Funk & Wagnall's defines the word covenant: an agreement, a formal compact. Roget's Thesaurus gives the following words as synonyms for the word covenant: solemn agreement, pledge, vow, promise, oath, bond, pact, treaty, contract, bargain. My friend Gordon made a living selling real estate, brokering stocks and bonds and working on deals between clients and the banks and investment companies he represented. Gordon knew the value and authority of a legally binding document, a covenant between two parties. Gordon was also a sincere Christian man who valued his walk with the Lord and spent a lot of time on his knees in prayer. Gordon was not only my friend but a good friend of my wife Colleen when we were living together as husband and wife in Tulsa, Oklahoma. It was Gordon in the dream who 'pulled back the curtain to reveal my wife Colleen'. Colleen was relaxed, composed, possessing all her faculties. But Colleen's composure and her relaxed state is exactly what was wrong with this picture. Colleen is my wife, and for 10 years I have been pleading with her to join me and be at my side in the ministry and calling on our lives as preacher and prophet to America. I have repeatedly and sincerely asked her to forgive me for the hurts she suffered as a result of my foolish behavior in the past. Sadly, unlike the apostle Peter, who was told by the Lord that he must forgive his brother from the heart, not 7 times but 70 times 7 Colleen has hardened her heart and is unconcerned regarding her obligations toward the marriage COVENANT. She refuses to communicate, keeps her whereabouts a secret, and makes no effort to inquire of the Lord regarding this issue. But the Lord is not unconcerned about this marriage COVENANT or any other covenant He becomes a party to. The Lord, like my friend Gordon, knows the legally binding and contractual aspects of a COVENANT. He knows that when either party to a covenant, breaks that covenant or ignores the obligations of that covenant, there will be a day when the standards of the COVENANT will be enforced. So, in the first part of the dream we see a woman (in this case my wife) who we know to be a Christian, who has a calling on her life, who entered into a marriage covenant with a Christian man (in this case me) who also has a calling on his life and yet she is unconcerned with her relationship to this man or the legal and spiritually binding aspects of the covenant she entered into with this man in the past. She feels, safe, secure and contented - but how she feels and how she is presently behaving gives no indication as to what the future holds for this COVENANT breaker, this COVENANT ignorer. Likewise, the Citizens of Phoenix, Arizona and this Nation, especially those who are in COVENANT with God through a born-again experience, are paying little or no heed to the multiple warnings we (this ministry and other ministries and ministers similar to our own) have been proclaiming. We have been on the internet, sponsored mass mailings, held multiple Christian chat rooms, conducted physical outreaches across the Nation repeatedly while visiting the City of Phoenix, Arizona twice (2) in less than four (4) months distributing thousands (1000's) of warning leaflets addressing the false prophets of health, wealth and giggling, fantasy revivals with lying signs and gold dust wonders while proclaiming the dreams, visions, prophetic utterances and experiences God has multiplied to us and through us to Warn the Church in America that God will no longer tolerate the foolishness of His Church. God is about to demonstrate His Wrath against this Nation in the worst calamity this world has experienced since the Flood of Noah's Age. The total destruction and annihilation of Phoenix, Arizona in a Nuclear Terrorist Attack - THE NEXT 911 - which will remove all doubt as to the degree of protection God is providing this Nation which is currently overflowing with false prophets, twisted scriptural teachings and religious hypocrisy that rivals the Reign of the Pharisees. God is saying to me, to you and to this Nation through this dream about COVENANT - 'Write down these dreams, visions and prophetic experiences I have given the three (3) of you over the past six (6) months concerning the calamity about to be visited upon the city of Phoenix, Arizona. Put it together as a legally binding document, because I am making a COVENANT with this Nation to bring this calamity to pass because they refuse to repent. And even as your wife has ignored you, her marriage covenant with you and every warning dream you have given her, which was from Me. Even so has this Nation ignored Me and Its COVENANT with Me. I have grown weary of pleading and begging with them to return to Me, even as you have been wearied through pleading and begging with your wife to return to her COVENANT relationship with you. Therefore, I shall pour out My wrath on them because they refuse to return to their COVENANT with Me. They are comfortable, content, satisfied in their ignorance. But as I stated through the wisdom granted Solomon, 'The tranquility of the simple will kill them, and the complacency of dullards will destroy them, but he who listens to me will dwell in safety, untroubled by the terror of misfortune.' (Proverbs 1:32,33) vision 2 - JESUS WEEPING (August 17th, 2002 - Mike Roell) I was praying together with Ben and Rich about Phoenix, Arizona when I had the following vision. I saw Dark Storm Clouds over the City of Phoenix. Then I saw JESUS WEEPING over the City of Phoenix, Arizona. dream 23 - PHOENIX PILLOW (August 22nd, 2002 - Rich Keltner) I saw a pillow. This pillow was different because it had the word PHOENIX printed all over it in a definite pattern like you might see indicating a specific brand of designer pillow. dream interpretation: It didn't take me long to figure this one out. God was telling me I was SLEEPING ON THE MESSAGE and He wanted me to crank up the engine and continue the warnings. WAKE UP AND WARN THEM before it was too late and the opportunity PASSES US BY and Phoenix is GONE. I might add that 'PILLOW PROPHETS' is a term people give to Prophets of God who are hearing hard things from the Spirit, however, because they are more interested in pleasing the people they only tell the good things they hear from the Spirit and ignore or exclude the warnings. dream 24 - GAUGE (September 14th, 2002 - Rich Keltner) I was on the phone with a prophetess (who currently lives in Phoenix, Arizona). I was telling her about some personal problems I was having with a woman I have been talking too and considering for marriage. She began to counsel me saying 'Everything will be just fine, everything will work out.' Suddenly, abruptly, the conversation stopped. At this point I could only hear quiet, yet labored breathing on the other end of the line as though something unusual had taken place and she was affected by the event. I then began to hear prolonged screaming in the background and the screams were coming from a tape recorder. The screams were shrill, terrible and eerie. It sounded like a woman was screaming in excruciating pain. dream interpretation: Tom Heward This prophetess, who currently lives in Phoenix, Arizona and who was talking to Rich in this dream, was eager to contact us several months ago when she read the dreams we posted, in April of 2002, on Bill Somer's Website, regarding The Destruction of Phoenix. God had spoken many things to her about the Judgment He is sending to Phoenix because of the Wicked State of God's Chosen People and the resultant corruption of the local population (Matt 5:13 Jesus stated that His Disciples were to be The Salt of the Earth, but if They became Tasteless then They were Worthless and No Longer Good for Anything, and They should be Cast Out and Trodden Under the Feet of Men). Near the End of July 2002 we were able to locate and speak with this prophetess via conference call regarding my dream 'MEMORIAL' along with other thoughts I was having about the timing of this destruction. In this conference call we learned that her 'apartment lease and business contracts' were scheduled to terminate near the end of OCTOBER 2002 leaving her free to depart from Phoenix. It had always been in the mind of this prophetess, that when the proper time came, the Spirit would warn her and she would leave the city. Hence, the actions of this prophetess and her communications with us became a potential 'GAUGE' as to when this destruction would take place. By the End of August 2002 we had heard nothing 'one way or the other' regarding this prophetess's guidance to 'remain in' or 'depart from' the city of Phoenix. We needed some input so Rich phoned her and asked what she was up to and what she was hearing from the Spirit regarding the Judgment coming to Phoenix. She told Rich that God had given her no confirmation about a nuclear terrorist attack coming in the month of OCTOBER 2002. She went on to tell Rich that God was prospering her financially in her business and she was making three (3) times more than she had made in the past. She was looking forward to using the finances to make additional preparations for the hard times that were coming to America. When Rich conveyed this information to me I breathed a sigh of relief. I began believing that perhaps our prayers on behalf of the city, the outreaches, the chat rooms, the warning leaflets were beginning to have an influence on Heaven's Timetable for Phoenix. Perhaps God was going to relent of the threatened calamity and give the City more time to repent. It was in the midst of two (2) weeks of pondering Rich's conversation with my 'prophetic GAUGE in Phoenix' that he had this dream. This prophetess from Phoenix is telling Rich, in the dream, exactly what he wanted to hear regarding his relationship with a potential mate, 'Everything will work out fine.' Then, in direct contrast to the counsel she is giving, suddenly 'Nothing is Fine.' The conversation takes an abrupt turn from 'Hearing what he wants to Hear' to 'Hearing what no one wants to Hear.' The prophetess has survived, because He can still hear her breathing on the other end of the line. Unfortunately, the person on tape, in the background is screaming in prolonged agonizing screams of pain. The prophetess's voice has been silenced, in the dream, because the Spirit is saying her 'sense of timing' regarding the Judgment coming to Phoenix is incorrect and she cannot be used as a 'GAUGE.' This person's screams being 'ON TAPE' are typically how '911 CALLS' are handled. PHOENIX, ARIZONA - THE NEXT 911 is exactly what God has been speaking to us through dreams, visions and prophetic experiences. This was the purpose behind everything I have been doing since I first heard from God along these lines. The message of this dream was clear. I was not to view this prophetess's discernment, regarding the TIMING OF THIS JUDGMENT coming to Phoenix, Arizona as being a reliable 'GAUGE'. DISCLAIMER PROPHETIC DATE SETTING: MIKE ROELL AND RICH KELTNER have received no confirmation through dreams, visions or prophetic experiences that the destruction of Phoenix, Arizona will take place in OCTOBER OF 2002 and the sole responsibility for publishing the dream 'MEMORIAL' and the interpretion and titling of the dream 'GAUGE' rests with TOM HEWARD. As you have read through these dreams you will notice that two (2) dreams: 'MEMORIAL' and 'GAUGE' deal directly (MEMORIAL) or indirectly (GAUGE) with a specific time frame for this destruction. Tom Heward had the dream 'MEMORIAL' in which he saw OCTOBER 2002 as the date of this calamity on a stone memorial. Rich Keltner had dream number 24, but it was Tom Heward who titled the dream 'GAUGE' and gave his interpretation of the dream. In deciding to include these two dreams in this document we went through much soul searching in an effort to determine if they should be published. We decided to publish these two dreams only on the premise that TOM HEWARD would take full responsibility for the date and allow us to publish a DISCLAIMER regarding our position on the date of the coming destruction of Phoenix, Arizona. Tom is of the understanding that PROPHETIC DATES, be they given in dreams or through the mouth of a prophet are subject to change. He sights three (3) examples in scripture: The prophet Jonah was told to tell the People of Nineveh that in 40 days their city was to be destroyed. This destruction never took place within 40 days because the Inhabitants of Nineveh repented and God relented of the threatened calamity. The prophet Isaiah told king Hezekiah to get his house in order because he was going to die. Upon hearing this declaration of the prophet the king immediately 'turned his face to the wall and wept profusely' in repentance. God saw the king's repentant heart and spoke again to the prophet Isaiah telling him to return to king Hezekiah to inform him that God would extend his life fifteen (15) years. The most familiar example of God being Willing to Change His mind regarding an Ordained Calamity deals with the Destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah. In this example the wickedness of the city had come before the Lord and He had sent His Angels to Destroy the City. In their errand to destroy these cities they first stopped by to talk with Abraham. During their conversation with Abraham they revealed to him the destruction they were sent to carry out on the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah. Abraham had relatives living in those wicked cities (namely Lot and his family) and this may have been one motivational factor in his attempt to bargain with the God for the lives of the inhabitants of these cities (Abraham was also a prophet). Abraham disputed with God or the Angels of God until God promised not to destroy those wicked cities if there were ten (10) righteous people living there. The outcome here was not favorable. God could not find ten (10) righteous in the city and it was entirely destroyed with Lot and his two (2) daughters being the only ones spared from the destruction. CONTACT INFORMATION: You can visit us on the web at phoenix.nextcrusade.com where we have constructed a website dealing specifically with the calamity coming to Phoenix, Arizona.. You can e-mail Tom Heward at day13mysbabylon@aol.com or phone him and leave a message at 1-877-412-7972 You can e-mail Rich Keltner at hatesonion@ureach.com You can e-mail Mike Roell at companyof@aol.com You will most likely be able to find us on the Streets of New York preaching the gospel or on the internet spreading the message of warning through chat rooms, instant messaging or e-mail. The Vision of the Future of Phoenix, Ariz. July 2004 Brian Charles After fasting for almost 3 days, I received this vision from God, when I was a resident of Phoenix, Arizona It was as if I was suspended about 200 to 300 feet above this urban area of Phoenix, looking down at this part of the city, which consisted of densely packed commercial and residential buildings. There were no roofs to be seen on any of these buildings, and all that they consisted of were charred, blackened masonry walls on concrete foundations, for a great fire had destroyed the whole entire city. There were no people to be seen anywhere in Phoenix , for the entire city was abandoned, without even a single inhabitant. The city closely resembled the ancient Anasazi Indian ruins to the north, or the archaeological site of Masada in Israel. Arizona Cities Nuclear Mushroom Clouds Dream Tuesday Dec. 22, 2009 Brian Charles I was standing outside at this rest area along I-10 in the area of the state between Phoenix and Tucson, around Eloy or Marana, Arizona. There were friendly people around me enjoying hot dogs and snacks at this caf'e there. I looked to the west, and I saw this huge, white mushroom cloud above where Phoenix was, and more flashes of light at its base in the far distance. It looked similar to a huge summer thunderhead cloud. Then I looked east towards Tucson, and saw this other tall, narrow mushroom cloud ascending, but it seemed to be like a big chemical or tire yard fire from all of this black smoke. I said to someone near me, "Look at this black cloud!" And then, from where Tucson was, another mushroom cloud shot up next to it and quickly ascended right before our eyes. There was this chemical plant near us along the Interstate, and then at the same time the tanks of this tank farm there started bursting and shooting up in the air, with the dark-greenish chemicals inside them were then spurting all over the place. I looked across the Interstate at this big truck stop-gas station-rest area building, and was wondering if its gas tanks would also explode, but they didn't. When these nuclear explosions were going off I was worried about being blinded or vaporized by their flashes of white light, but it didn't happen.