http://www.liveleak.com/browse?q=murderers Sat, 18 May 2013 07:46:47 -0400 Liveleak http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/ll2/logo.gif http://www.liveleak.com/browse?q=murderers Sat, 18 May 2013 04:11:37 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ccd_1368863899 VenezuelaLeak A night of fun and drinks with friends ended in tragedy for Carlos Pereira Gil (35) and Libardo Galu Castillo, 33, who were killed by multiple gunshots in the parking lot of a nightspot in Costa Azul. According to information from relatives of the victims, Galu and Pereira were attacked by subjects after leaving a nightclub. With sadness and sorrow for what happened, . Apparently one of the alleged murderers threw a glass of liquor. "They were calm with some friends when suddenly someone threw them a drink. He had no problems with anyone, and neither knew these men, "said Carlos disconsolate's fiancee. Gil Pereira, a native of Cumana, Sucre state, was an English teacher at school Monsignor Eduardo Vasquez of The Stones of the Holy Spirit Valley in the municipality Garcia and had several years impeached on the island of Margarita. His remains would be transferred to his homeland for burial, he told Gil Pereira's girlfriend. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ccd_1368863899 VenezuelaLeak Shooting in Sr.Frogs murder, kill, fight, club, aftermath, crazy, norespect Wed, 15 May 2013 12:03:10 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=715_1368633440 th1sf8te Home secretary Theresa May announces proposals for new sentencing for those convicted of murdering a police officer. Speaking at the Police Federation conference on Tuesday, May said such crimes represent an attack on the 'fundamental basis of our society'. She announced that whole-life sentences will be given for such offences in future http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=715_1368633440 th1sf8te Theresa May: <span class="highlight">murderers</span> of police officers to be given whole-life sentences Theresa May: murderers of police officers to be given whole-life sentences Mon, 13 May 2013 20:47:42 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=649_1368492226 dfaugust Finally: 56 Days Later, ABC Ends Blackout and Covers Gosnell 'House of Horrors' Fifty six days after the grisly trial of abortionist Kermit Gosnell began, ABC broke its self-imposed blackout and finally offered coverage. World News anchor Diane Sawyer belatedly told viewers that Gosnell was convicted on three counts of first degree murder against newborn babies, as well as on a slew of other charges. Terry Moran explained, "For two months, jurors heard often shocking, grisly testimony." He described the details as a "house of horrors." A house of horrors that ABC took 56 days to notice. As the Media Research Center has aggressively documented, ABC went from March 18, 2003 (the trial's start) through Monday afternoon with no coverage. Yet, during the same time, the network devoted a staggering 187 minutes (or 70 segments) to other shocking criminal cases, such as Jodi Arias and Amanda Knox. Moran noted that "Opponents of legalized abortion seized on this case." The journalist quoted Jeanneane Maxon, the vice president of Americans United for Life. She asserted, "Well, Gosnell's not an aberration. Abortion clinics are unregulated and every year we see the deaths of women inside these clinics." Nightline's Moran first highlighted the Gosnell case on Twitter, way back on April 12. But he has failed to cover the story until now. DIANE SAWYER: And now we turn to a verdict making headlines tonight, fueling arguments on all sides about abortion in America. Tonight a doctor in Philadelphia is facing the death penalty for what he did. Just hours ago, a jury finding him guilty of three counts of first-degree murder. ABC's Terry Moran tells us what the jury decided today, and what it means. TERRY MORAN: Dr. Kermit Gosnell, led away in handcuffs today after jurors convicted him of murdering three babies, killing them with scissors after they were born during botched abortions he performed on women who were as much as seven months pregnant. His lawyer described Gosnell's reaction. JACK MCMAHON (Gosnell lawyer): He's disappointed and he's upset. MORAN: For two months, jurors heard often shocking grisly testimony, including from members of Gosnell's staff, who claimed they witnessed him killing live babies. The case began in February 2010, when FBI agents raided Gosnell's clinic. They were looking for evidence of prescription drug dealing. Instead, they found a filthy house of horrors. UNIDENTIFIED MAN: Children were born and then killed. MORAN: For decades, Gosnell ran his clinic, the Women's Medical Society in West Philadelphia, a poor, mostly black neighborhood where doctors were scarce and patients were sometimes desperate. Gosnell's lawyer calls this prosecution racist, arguing his client served his community and never killed a live-born baby. But jurors found otherwise. Opponents of legalized abortion seized on this case. JEANNEANE MAXON (VP, Americans United for Life): Well, Gosnell's not an aberration. Abortion clinics are unregulated and every year we see the deaths of women inside these clinics. MORAN: But supporters of abortion-rights argue that Gosnell's shady, dangerous practices are exactly what women will face across the country if abortion is outlawed. Gosnell now face the death penalty. Terry Moran, ABC News, New York. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/scott-whitlock/2013/05/13/finally-56-days-later-abc-ends-blackout-and-covers-gosnell-house-h-0#ixzz2TDVLCX4t http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=649_1368492226 dfaugust Finally: 56 Days Later, ABC Ends Blackout and Covers Gosnell 'House of Horrors' abortion, liberals, democRATs, leftists, progressives, liars, murderers, baby-killers, obama, planned parenthood Mon, 13 May 2013 18:38:22 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=879_1368484561 dfaugust White House Meets Privately with Press to Discuss Benghazi In the White House's latest efforts at transparency, the administration announced to reporters that it would brief reporters on the latest shocking developments about the Benghazi situation ... behind closed doors. Politico reports that the meeting started at approximately 12:45 PM ET, and that it moved the normal press briefing to 1:45 PM ET. Jay Carney, White House press secretary, did not comment on whether the meeting took place. Politico reports: The off-the-record session was announced to reporters in the wake of an ABC News report showing that White House and State Dept. officials were involved in revising the now-discredited CIA talking points about the attack on Benghazi. The administration routinely exerts pressure on reporters it feels are not kind enough in their coverage. Reporters like Cheryl Attkisson of CBS News have felt the hand of their bosses for "wading dangerously close to advocacy" with regard to Benghazi. No doubt this "off-the-record" meeting was designed to get all the president's horses and all the president's men to put the Benghazi humpty dumpty together again. UPDATE: Reporters not invited to the off-the-record briefing are reportedly incredibly unhappy about it: AprilDRyan: "Big mistake!!!!!!! Reporters are not happy with this off the record briefing before the briefing with a handful of the Press Corps." UPDATE II: Jake Tapper of CNN reports that the regularly scheduled press briefing has been delayed even further: "WH press briefing scheduled for 12:30, then 1:45, now 3:15." UPDATE III: Politico now reports that the meeting has been characterized as "deep background." The existence of the meeting itself is considered "off-the-record." White House spokesman Josh Earnest said, "Deep background means that the info presented by the briefers can be used in reporting but the briefers can't be quoted." So expect a fair number of "White House sources" to appear in reportage for the next few days. UPDATE IV: Jay Carney began his on-the-record press briefing by announcing that 14 news organizations were invited to the closed door briefing, but that it was not a substitute for the on-the- record briefing. He then announced that it was "erroneous" to describe the briefing as "off-the-record," and instead suggested it was "deep background." Ben Shapiro http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013/05/10/White-House-Benghazi- off-the-record http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=879_1368484561 dfaugust obama admin setting up their story to cover their tracks on Bengahzi Bengahzi, obama, hillary clinton, propagandists, liars, murderers, traitors Tue, 14 May 2013 17:27:21 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=396_1368566520 Chemicle The Auschwitz Plaques and the 6 Million Myth Posted on May 11, 2013 by Vincit Omnia Veritas See that photo above? It's a photo of a plaque that used to be at the Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial in Poland. The plans to open a museum and memorial at Auschwitz began almost immediately after the end of World War II. An act creating the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum was passed by the Poles in 1947 and later that year, in support of the creation of Israel, the museum opened with its first exhibit in Auschwitz I. In 1967 the Poles unveiled the International Monument to the Victims of Fascism in Birkenau. It was in front of this monument where one could find 19 plaques, each in different language, telling the visitors that 4 million people were killed at Auschwitz. In English, the plaque read the following: Four Million people suffered and died here at the hands of the Nazi murderers between the years 1940 and 1945. The 4 Million figure was rounded down from 4.1 Million figured featured at the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum. That figure was derived from "confession" by Rudolf H"oss at the Nuremburg Trials and the accounts of the Holocaust Survivors who "survived" Auschwitz. Rudolf H"oss was the commandant of Auschwitz labor camp for two and a half years. His affidavit made on April 5, 1946 read: I commanded Auschwitz until December 1, 1943 and estimate that at least 2.5 Million victims were executed and exterminated there by gassing and burning, and at least another half Million succumbed to starvation and disease, making a total dead of about 3 Million. The figure of 4 Million dead at Auschwitz was an instrumental part of the " 6 Million Jews " myth. From the Nuremburg trials in 1945 and 1946 onwards, people of the world were force fed the "fact" that 4 Million people died at Auschwitz and 6 Million Jews died during World War II. Anyone who challenged any of these numbers was targeted for prosecution. Many lost their jobs, had their names smeared and livelihoods destroyed. Yet there were also some who were imprisoned, assassinated, disappeared without a trace or went into hiding. If you were not a researcher, just an ordinary member of the public who implied that the 4 Million deaths at Auschwitz may have been an over exaggeration, the hoards of indoctrinated, zombified sheep would trample the crap out of you. But despite undying efforts to prohibit and prosecute independent research into Auschwitz, the 4 Million figure continued to be more and more unsustainable. Eventually, in 1990 - after the fall of communism in Eastern Europe which brought with itself the end of the rule by Jewish Bolsheviks, the USSR released captured Death Registry Volumes and the entire Jewish community along with the Americans, British, French and Russians had no other way but to officially, albeit without giving it too much public exposure, revise the number. With that, the original plaques at the Auschwitz Memorial were removed and replaced with new ones which can be found there to this day. The new text reads (in English): For ever let this place be a cry of despair and a warning to humanity, where the Nazis murdered about one and a half Million men, women and children from various countries of Europe. Auschwitz - Birkenau 1940 - 1945 New Plaque at the Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial Contains Revised Number of Victims from Original 4 Million Down by 2.5 Million That's right - a 2.5 Million people mistake!!! Let me say it again - for almost half a century after the end of WWII people were brainwashed to unconditionally accept that 4 Million were killed in Auschwitz. Those who but hinted that the figure may be excessive were thrown in jail and called racists, neo Nazis, anti Semites, enticers of racial hatred, or as was the case with Ernst Z"undel - "...a risk to Canada's national security." Funny thing is - prior to 1990, if you as a member of the general public suggested that the 4 Million figure could be a bit excessive and if you just implied that it could be as low as 2 Million, the indoctrinated, zombified sheeple would trample the shit out of you with name calling and death threats. Yet not only would you be correct, you would still not have gone down enough. Now here's the question for the sheeple - taking into an account this drastic, down by 2.5 Million people revision - would you still attack me and call me names if I said that 1.5 Million killed at Auschwitz is still too high? Go ahead, attack me. Cause I have a surprise for you: As of at least mid 2008, the US Holocaust Memorial Museum website has contained a further revised number. You can read about it on ushmm.org : At least 960,000 Jews were killed in Auschwitz. Other victims included approximately 74,000 Poles, 21,000 Roma (Gypsies), and 15,000 Soviet prisoners of war; and 10,000-15,000 members of other nationalities (Soviet civilians, Czechs, Yugoslavs, French, Germans, and Austrians). Here's a screenshot of the page for archiving purposes in case the number gets revised again: The US Holocaust Memorial Museum Website Contains Latest Revision Which Claimed 1.1 Million Were Killed in Auschwitz In other words, despite the plaques in front of the Auschwitz State Museum not being updated anymore, the latest revised number of total people claimed by the Holocaust storytellers to have died in Auschwitz is less than 1.1 Million. The difference between 4 Million and 1.1 Million is quite significant. We're not talking about a few percentages here and there. We're talking almost 400% inflation from a more realistic number, which considering how it kept being revised over the years, may not be final yet. What does this tell you about the trustworthiness of what "they" teach us about the Holocaust? And that leads me to the ultimate questions of this post - the number of deaths in Auschwitz were part of the 6 Million myth. How come the Auschwitz number was officially dropped by 3 Million yet the 6 Million myth continues being fed to our children in the institutions of indoctrination ? How come our children are not taught that Rudolf H"oss' confession was a result of torture and duress whereas his captors placed all bids on sensationalism at an expense of plausibility? ReminderI consider it important to remind everyone that the purpose of the Holohoax series is not to state that they say this and I say that - they are wrong, I am right. The purpose is to engage your critical thinking so you can draw conclusions for yourself. Never arbitrarily accept other people's version of the "truth". Not mine, not theirs, not anyone's. Verify, double verify and trust no one but your own gut. That's how you'll find the truth. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=396_1368566520 Chemicle 6 Million Jew's eh? Holocaust Sat, 11 May 2013 13:11:20 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ae6_1368290881 Marcux By David Barret I never met Malcolm Shabazz, the outspoken activist whose grandfather, Malcolm X, was the most influential African-American of the 20th century. Now I will never meet him. According to reports, Malcolm Shabazz was recently murdered in Mexico. I had been hoping to get to know Malcolm Shabazz at last February's Hollywoodism Conference in Tehran. But the US National Security State had other ideas. While trying to catch his flight to Tehran, Malcolm was arrested by the FBI. No explanation for the arrest was ever provided. Why did US authorities prevent Malcolm from traveling to Iran? The arrest was almost certainly politically-motivated. Malcolm Shabazz's presence at the Hollywoodism Conference would have brought the event invaluable publicity - especially in the black community and among Muslims, anti-Zionists, and anti-imperialists worldwide. And that publicity would have fueled Malcolm's impending rise to superstar-dissident status. Make no mistake: Malcolm Shabazz, like his grandfather, posed a serious, "actionable" long-term threat to the powers-that-be. Malcolm had converted to Shi'a Islam and become a spokesman for the "axis of resistance" - not just anti-Zionist forces in the Middle East, but anti-empire forces around the world. Like his grandfather, he had had some brushes with the law when he was young. And like his grandfather, he was on the road to putting his past behind him and becoming a charismatic spokesman for the world's dispossessed. I do not know whether the usual suspects - the "asteroids" who assassinate the enemies of empire on behalf of the CIA, the World Bank, and related entities, according to author John Perkins - killed Malcolm Shabazz. But I am 100% certain that they were thinking about it. How can I be so sure? I have been studying these assassinations for many years. My conclusion is that the empire's assassins profile their potential enemies, and decide which ones present an "actionable threat." Charismatic leaders with access to the media are among the most actionable threats. President John F. Kennedy was murdered because he was so charismatic and media-savvy that he was capable of pushing through policies that the guardians of empire deemed unacceptable: Nuclear disarmament, rapprochement with Cuba, d'etente with Russia, withdrawal from Vietnam, a new deal for the Third World. This story has been beautifully told by James Douglass, one of America's leading peace activists, in his book JFK and the Unspeakable. JFK's brother Robert Kennedy also presented an actionable threat to the powers-that-be. RFK would have been elected president in 1968 had he not been gunned down by CIA assassins. Robert wanted to be president, so he could prosecute his brother's murderers and continue his brother's policies. But the "asteroids" - and their bankster masters - had other ideas. Martin Luther King was also an "actionable threat." MLK had turned against the Vietnam War and the whole military-industrial complex, even as the FBI was trying to drive him crazy and make him commit suicide. Far from committing suicide, MLK was planning to lead a half-million people to occupy Washington DC and stay there until the war and poverty were both ended. So - as a jury verdict legally established in 1999 - the US Army, FBI, and CIA worked together to murder Dr. King. The full story is in William Pepper's book Act of State. Other "actionable threats" in recent history include JFK Jr., who was murdered in 1999 for pursuing the killers of his father and uncle; Senator Paul Wellstone, murdered in 2003 for planning to investigate 9/11 and prevent the US from invading Iraq; and Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, killed with a cancer weapon for the crime of having enough charisma to almost single-handedly lead Latin America out from under the US empire. Malcolm Shabazz's grandfather, Malcolm X, was also an "actionable threat" when the CIA orchestrated his assassination in 1965. Malcolm X was forging an anti-empire alliance consisting of Muslims and other non-Western victims of imperialism, along with poor and middle-class American whites and blacks...the same alliance Dr. King was assembling when he was killed three years later. And now, Malcolm Shabazz - who was forging an updated version of the same anti-empire alliance - is murdered in Mexico. Coincidence? Maybe. But look at it from the point of view of his likely murderers. From their perspective, Malcolm Shabazz seemed to be following in his grandfather's footsteps. If they waited much longer to kill him, and let him establish his growing reputation as a respected activist, it would be a lot harder to stage an assassination and then spread the media propaganda line, based on the ancient history of his alleged teenage misdeeds, that he was "just a thug." If they waited until his book was finished and published, killing him would look suspicious...and sell his book. And if they waited until he got as famous and influential as his grandfather, they might have wound up with a major problem on their hands. So, apparently, they decided to take pre-emptive action. Kill him while he's only a decade or so past his "troubled" phase. Do it in a way that reinforces the "troubled young man with a criminal history" Operation Mockingbird mantra. Spread that mantra through all of the controlled-media outlets. Whatever happened to Malcolm Shabazz, it is abundantly obvious that the intelligence agency assets infiltrating US mainstream media are conducting a scripted posthumous character-assassination designed to obscure Malcolm's role as an up-and-coming activist and long-term threat to the Empire. If you search the CIA-Mossad-linked Google for "Malcolm Shabazz," the first result is a story published by the CIA propaganda front, the Huffington Post. The story is a smear designed to drag Malcolm's name through the mud. Huffington Post: "In his youth, he set a fire that caused the death of his grandmother." Reality: Malcolm Shabazz denied having set that fire as a child; he was forced to plead guilty in the same way that virtually all defendants, especially African-American ones, are forced to plead guilty in plea bargains to avoid facing long prison terms for crimes they may or may not have committed. Huffington Post: "Shabazz continued to have trouble with the law throughout his life." Reality: His last conviction was in 2002, more than a decade ago; the only "trouble" the character-assassins could find since then was an arrest, with no conviction, meaning he was and remains legally innocent. In other words, he was legally deemed innocent of allegedly "punching a hole in a store window" in 2006 (seven years ago!) In the USA, where Obama's presidency has not decriminalized "Driving While Black," practically all young black men have "trouble with the law." Actually, it isn't that they have trouble with the law. It's that the law has trouble with them. Being young, black, and male means being guilty until proven innocent. The imperial propagandists at the New York Times, Huffington Post, and similar outlets are working overtime smearing Malcolm Shabazz. This apparently pre-orchestrated smear smells like an intelligence operation. It is strong circumstantial evidence that Malcolm Shabazz was yet another political assassination victim. Malcolm Shabazz's real "crime," like that of his famous grandfather, was joining the axis of resistance, standing up to Zionism and the US empire, and speaking the truth. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ae6_1368290881 Marcux Did CIA kill Malcolm X's grandson? Did CIA kill Malcolm X's grandson? Sat, 11 May 2013 10:19:18 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=aed_1368281820 omniradar Did CIA kill Malcolm X's grandson? 13 By Dr. Kevin BarrettMalcolm Shabazz had converted to Shi'a Islam and become a spokesman for the "axis of resistance" - not just anti-Zionist forces in the Middle East, but anti-empire forces around the world. I never met Malcolm Shabazz, the outspoken activist whose grandfather, Malcolm X, was the most influential African-American of the 20th century. Now I will never meet him. According to reports, Malcolm Shabazz was recently murdered in Mexico. I had been hoping to get to know Malcolm Shabazz at last February's Hollywoodism Conference in Tehran. But the US National Security State had other ideas. While trying to catch his flight to Tehran, Malcolm was arrested by the FBI. No explanation for the arrest was ever provided. Why did US authorities prevent Malcolm from traveling to Iran? The arrest was almost certainly politically-motivated. Malcolm Shabazz's presence at the Hollywoodism Conference would have brought the event invaluable publicity - especially in the black community and among Muslims, anti-Zionists, and anti-imperialists worldwide. And that publicity would have fueled Malcolm's impending rise to superstar-dissident status. Make no mistake: Malcolm Shabazz, like his grandfather, posed a serious, "actionable" long-term threat to the powers-that-be. Malcolm had converted to Shi'a Islam and become a spokesman for the "axis of resistance" - not just anti-Zionist forces in the Middle East, but anti-empire forces around the world. Like his grandfather, he had had some brushes with the law when he was young. And like his grandfather, he was on the road to putting his past behind him and becoming a charismatic spokesman for the world's dispossessed. I do not know whether the usual suspects - the "asteroids" who assassinate the enemies of empire on behalf of the CIA, the World Bank, and related entities, according to author John Perkins - killed Malcolm Shabazz. But I am 100% certain that they were thinking about it. How can I be so sure? I have been studying these assassinations for many years. My conclusion is that the empire's assassins profile their potential enemies, and decide which ones present an "actionable threat." Charismatic leaders with access to the media are among the most actionable threats. President John F. Kennedy was murdered because he was so charismatic and media-savvy that he was capable of pushing through policies that the guardians of empire deemed unacceptable: Nuclear disarmament, rapprochement with Cuba, d'etente with Russia, withdrawal from Vietnam, a new deal for the Third World. This story has been beautifully told by James Douglass, one of America's leading peace activists, in his book JFK and the Unspeakable. JFK's brother Robert Kennedy also presented an actionable threat to the powers-that-be. RFK would have been elected president in 1968 had he not been gunned down by CIA assassins. Robert wanted to be president, so he could prosecute his brother's murderers and continue his brother's policies. But the "asteroids" - and their bankster masters - had other ideas. Martin Luther King was also an "actionable threat." MLK had turned against the Vietnam War and the whole military-industrial complex, even as the FBI was trying to drive him crazy and make him commit suicide. Far from committing suicide, MLK was planning to lead a half-million people to occupy Washington DC and stay there until the war and poverty were both ended. So - as a jury verdict legally established in 1999 - the US Army, FBI, and CIA worked together to murder Dr. King. The full story is in William Pepper's book Act of State. Other "actionable threats" in recent history include JFK Jr., who was murdered in 1999 for pursuing the killers of his father and uncle; Senator Paul Wellstone, murdered in 2003 for planning to investigate 9/11 and prevent the US from invading Iraq; and Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, killed with a cancer weapon for the crime of having enough charisma to almost single-handedly lead Latin America out from under the US empire. Malcolm Shabazz's grandfather, Malcolm X, was also an "actionable threat" when the CIA orchestrated his assassination in 1965. Malcolm X was forging an anti-empire alliance consisting of Muslims and other non-Western victims of imperialism, along with poor and middle-class American whites and blacks...the same alliance Dr. King was assembling when he was killed three years later. And now, Malcolm Shabazz - who was forging an updated version of the same anti-empire alliance - is murdered in Mexico. Coincidence? Maybe. But look at it from the point of view of his likely murderers. From their perspective, Malcolm Shabazz seemed to be following in his grandfather's footsteps. If they waited much longer to kill him, and let him establish his growing reputation as a respected activist, it would be a lot harder to stage an assassination and then spread the media propaganda line, based on the ancient history of his alleged teenage misdeeds, that he was "just a thug." If they waited until his book was finished and published, killing him would look suspicious...and sell his book. And if they waited until he got as famous and influential as his grandfather, they might have wound up with a major problem on their hands. So, apparently, they decided to take pre-emptive action. Kill him while he's only a decade or so past his "troubled" phase. Do it in a way that reinforces the "troubled young man with a criminal history" Operation Mockingbird mantra. Spread that mantra through all of the controlled-media outlets. Whatever happened to Malcolm Shabazz, it is abundantly obvious that the intelligence agency assets infiltrating US mainstream media are conducting a scripted posthumous character-assassination designed to obscure Malcolm's role as an up-and-coming activist and long-term threat to the Empire. If you search the CIA-Mossad-linked Google for "Malcolm Shabazz," the first result is a story published by the CIA propaganda front, the Huffington Post. The story is a smear designed to drag Malcolm's name through the mud. Huffington Post: "In his youth, he set a fire that caused the death of his grandmother." Reality: Malcolm Shabazz denied having set that fire as a child; he was forced to plead guilty in the same way that virtually all defendants, especially African-American ones, are forced to plead guilty in plea bargains to avoid facing long prison terms for crimes they may or may not have committed. Huffington Post: "Shabazz continued to have trouble with the law throughout his life." Reality: His last conviction was in 2002, more than a decade ago; the only "trouble" the character-assassins could find since then was an arrest, with no conviction, meaning he was and remains legally innocent. In other words, he was legally deemed innocent of allegedly "punching a hole in a store window" in 2006 (seven years ago!) In the USA, where Obama's presidency has not decriminalized "Driving While Black," practically all young black men have "trouble with the law." Actually, it isn't that they have trouble with the law. It's that the law has trouble with them. Being young, black, and male means being guilty until proven innocent. The imperial propagandists at the New York Times, Huffington Post, and similar outlets are working overtime smearing Malcolm Shabazz. This apparently pre-orchestrated smear smells like an intelligence operation. It is strong circumstantial evidence that Malcolm Shabazz was yet another political assassination victim. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=aed_1368281820 omniradar Did CIA kill Malcolm X's grandson? C.I.A Tue, 07 May 2013 00:58:53 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=098_1367902406 dcmfox Televangelist Pat Robertson on Monday defended an Ecuadorian preacher's homophobic comments and said that LGBT people could change their "orientation," just like God could change murderers and rapists. The Huffington Post reported earlier this year that evangelical preacher Nelson Zavala had his political rights revoked after he said that homosexuality was "immoral" while he was campaigning for president. "For somebody to say that a homosexual can change is somehow a hate crime -- it is a hate crime to say that somebody can change their sexual preference, that that's a hate crime?" Robertson opined on Monday. "That's what's going to happen, ladies and gentlemen. Mark that down and fight for freedom because that man's freedom of speech is being taken away." "And the idea that anybody who has ministered to thousands of people -- as undoubtedly he has and others have in that church in Ecuador -- know very well that the power of God can change people's orientation. A murderer can change, a rapist can change, a thief can change. That's what the gospel is all about. It's not a hate crime." (h/t: Right Wing Watch ) http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/ http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=098_1367902406 dcmfox Robertson: God Can Change <span class="highlight">Murderers</span>, Rapists... and Homosexuals Ecuador, Ex-gay movement, Homophobia, Homosexuality, LGBT rights, Nelson Zavala, Pat Robertson Sun, 28 Apr 2013 20:20:03 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=7a5_1367194278 Ham_Sandwich27 ....or at the very least, does not consider an accusation of all veterans being murders to be offensive or in volation of the following terms of use: http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2013/04/27/pol-veterans-affairs-to-expand-program-for-hiring-injured-veterans.html Keep Your Content relevant to the topic and avoid repetitive posting. Be respectful and courteous, as if you were having a face-to-face discussion. If you are writing about legal issues, remember that people are innocent until proven guilty (that may mean using words such as "allegedly"). Feel free to link internally within the CBC.ca/Radio-Canada.ca site as many times as you would like. As for external web addresses, we allow no more than three links per post. CBC/Radio-Canada does not endorse the content of external web sites and has no liability as to their content in any event. CBC/Radio-Canada reserves its right to take-down any external link. Radio-Canada: Use French for all of your exchanges and comments. Other languages cannot be used except for an occasional word. CBC: Use English or French for all of your exchanges and comment. Other languages cannot be used except for an occasional word. We want to hear your own opinion. Your Content must be created and owned by you, including any music and artwork. Breaking copyright rules is not permitted (that includes copying and pasting excerpts from other sites without permission and attribution). If the majority of Your Content was written or created by someone else, even with a proper credit, it won't be accepted. Any of Your Content that is offensive and likely to expose an individual or a group of individuals to hatred or contempt on the basis of race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, sexual orientation, age or mental or physical disability is prohibited. The following kind of Your Content is also prohibited: Pornography, vulgarity, obscenity or sexually explicit content Anything illegal Hate speech Threats, harassment Personal attacks, insults and defamatory statements Threats or suggesting committing a criminal act Attempts to mobilise people for any purpose outside of a CBC event Respect other people's privacy by not including personal information in Your Content (such as phone numbers and email addresses) or private dialogue. Be sensitive in 'Your Content' regarding the death or injury of private individual, especially children. Any words or your full message in bold, underlined, italics or all CAPS will not be allowed (this makes it difficult to read and in online speak is considered yelling unless it is an acronym in which case using CAPS is permitted). Make it personal, not commercial by leaving out press releases and commercial promotions. All attemts to report this message were denied by the CBC, as well, the CBC has blocked all rebuttal responses to this comment, and are apparently actively protecting it. Jusde for yourself what their motivation may be to protect this statement. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=7a5_1367194278 Ham_Sandwich27 Canadian Broadcasting Corporation considers all veterans to be &quot;<span class="highlight">murderers</span>&quot;.&quot; liberal media, bias, traitors, communists, socialists, leftists Fri, 03 May 2013 15:28:07 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=189_1367605695 Changethecurrent 17 UNANSWERED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE BOSTON MARATHON BOMBING THE MEDIA IS AFRAID TO ASK http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=189_1367605695 Changethecurrent 17 UNANSWERED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE BOSTON MARATHON BOMBING THE MEDIA IS AFRAID TO ASK evil, killers, liers, cheaters, theives, murderers, cheats, death, decive Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:05:59 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=593_1366920162 Shami2012 Security agencies report a growing number of European Islamists joining the Syrian rebel effort. Germany is among the countries worried that the volunteers could remain dangerous when they return home. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=593_1366920162 Shami2012 Alarm over European fighters in Syria | Journal syria, jihad, terrorists, europe, islamists, salafis, murderers Sun, 21 Apr 2013 17:07:17 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b0a_1366578310 jonnycash Think about it. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b0a_1366578310 jonnycash Only 1 Terrorist terrorists, usa, killers, murderers, bomb, slaughter