Safe Mode: On
Breaking: Deadly Bombings Rock Baghdad, Just the Beginning. Nice Job Obama
 Part of channel(s): Iraq (current event)

This is only the beginning, this is the policy of appeasement at work, the policy of election time tables.
Series of blasts rip through Baghdad Thursday, killing at least 57, and while no group has claimed responsibility, the coordinated nature of the attack suggests a planning capability only available to Al Qaeda in Iraq.
A wave of violence ripped across Baghdad on Thursday morning, killing at least 57 people and injuring nearly 200 in a coordinated attack designed to wreak havoc in the Iraqi capital just days after American forces left the country.

The blasts were the worst violence since a political crisis between Iraq's Sunni and Shiite factions erupted this weekend. The political spat, which pits Iraq's Shiite prime minister against the highest-ranking Sunni political leader, has raised fears that Iraq's sectarian wounds will be reopened during a fragile time when Iraq is finally navigating its own political future without U.S. military support.


Iraqi officials said at least 12 blasts went off early Thursday morning in nine neighborhoods around the city. The explosions ranged from blasts from sticky bombs attached to cars to roadside bombs and vehicles packed with explosives.

Most of the attacks appeared to hit Shiite neighborhoods although some Sunni areas were also targeted.

The spokesman for the Iraqi health ministry put the death toll at 49 people and said at least 167 people were also injured. He did not have a breakdown of where the dead and injured were killed.

Earlier reports indicated that the worst of the violence occurred in al-Amal neighborhood where seven people were killed in a blast that appeared to target rescuers and officials who came to the scene after a previous explosion. At least four people were killed in one western Baghdad neighborhood when two roadside bombs exploded.

All the information came from police and hospital officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media.

In the southwestern neighborhood of Karrada, where one of the victims was killed, sirens could be heard as ambulances rushed to the scene and a large plume of smoke rose over the explosion site.

"My baby was sleeping in her bed. Shards of glass have fallen on our heads. Her father hugged her and carried her. She is now scared in the next room," said one woman in western Baghdad who identified herself as Um Hanin. "All countries are stable. Why don't we have security and stability?"

While Baghdad and Iraq have gotten much safer over the years, explosions like Thursday's are still commonplace. They come at a precarious time in Iraq's political history, just days after American troops pulled out of Iraq.

The government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has accused the Sunni Vice President Tariq al-Hashemi of running a hit squad that targeted government officials. Al-Maliki is also pushing for a vote of no-confidence against another Sunni politician, the deputy prime minister Saleh al-Mutlaq.

Many Sunnis fear that this is part of a wider campaign to go after Sunni political figures in general and shore up Shiite control across the country at a critical time when all American troops have left Iraq.

There was no immediate claim of responsibility for the morning's violence. But the coordinated nature of the assault and the fact that the attacks took place in numerous neighborhoods suggested a planning capability only available to Al Qaeda in Iraq.

Many of the neighborhoods were also Shiite areas which are a favorite target of Al Qaeda. The Sunni extremist group often targets Shiites who they believe are not true Muslims.

Al Qaeda in Iraq is severely debilitated from its previous strength in the early years of the war, but is still able to launch coordinated and deadly assaults from time to time.

U.S. military officials have said they're worried about a resurgence of Al Qaeda after the American military leaves the country. If that happens, it could lead Shiite militants to fight back and attack Sunni targets, thus sending Iraq back to the sectarian violence it experienced just a few years ago.




Added: Dec-22-2011 
By: singlelife
In:
Iraq
Tags: obama, retreat, appreasment, 2012 election, al qaeda, per se
Marked as: approved
Views: 3669 | Comments: 76 | Votes: 1 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Title fail! This would of never happened if our troops were there right?
    lol idiot!

    Posted Dec-22-2011 By 

    (5)

  • Yeah, blame Obama...not Bush and Co. that lied their sorry asses off and who should be facing charges right now. Yeah, we fucked up...but what, are we supposed to keep forces there forever now to keep the country from imploding? Keep protecting Irans puppet Malaki? Again blaming Obama for this...you people are pathetic.

    Posted Dec-22-2011 By 

    (3)

  • horray! now the koranimals r doing what they do best they r owning themselves

    Posted Dec-22-2011 By 

    (3)

  • Comment of user 'dippydoeshouston' has been deleted by author!
  • There is no future for islam

    Posted Dec-22-2011 By 

    (2)

  • Nice Job obama?? OBAMA???? SERIOUS?? Nice job bush...

    Posted Dec-22-2011 By 

    (2)

  • Comment of user 'updougdown' has been deleted by author!
  • I cant believe there's actually people out there that still supported this war. You were happy with thousands of your own citizens dying all to "liberate" the Iraqi people? "AKA help make Halliburton billions richer".

    Tools.



    RIP all the soldiers that signed up for the Afghan war but instead were sent to Iraq.

    I have no sympathy for those that volunteered specifically for Iraq.

    Posted Dec-22-2011 By 

    (2)

  • what a moronic subtitle. you think we should just stay there forever to keep these things from happening? or just not tell them when we are going to leave and pack up in the middle of the night. that will make them so confused that they will not set off bombs. we shouldn't have been there in the first place. saddam was just really good at keeping two completely irrational groups of people from fighting with one another. its just business as usual.

    Posted Dec-22-2011 By 

    (2)

  • You wanted us out.

    All yours.

    Posted Dec-22-2011 By 

    (2)

  • Obama has plenty to be blamed for but incident is not one of them. The Iraqis wanted the United States to get out ASAP because pressure was mounting to put some US soldiers on trial in Iraqi court. Obviously the US wasn't going to allow troops to be tried in Iraqi court so the Iraqi government told the US to get out. Obama didn't even want US soldiers out this soon but he realized there could be political consequences.

    Regardless, the United States cannot be in there forever. I hope the bes More..

    Posted Dec-22-2011 By 

    (2)

  • We were not going to stay there forever. This was bound to happen, these people need to sort out their own affairs and there was nothing Obama or Ron Paul or Newt Gingrich or anybody else can do to stop it.

    Posted Dec-22-2011 By 

    (1)

  • This war is never going to end.

    Posted Dec-22-2011 By 

    (1)

  • LMBO, yeah, blame Obama that Iraqi's dont have any balls to stand up to these insane terrorist. They will go right back to their Civil war much as it was 3 years ago. If we didnt have ours here centuries ago, history would have changed completly. Let their road to freedome begine.

    Posted Dec-22-2011 By 

    (1)

  • Unfortunately only the way Saddam ran that country is the only way to have any kind of normalcy in a place like that. Peace by threat of death, makes sense, eh?

    Posted Dec-22-2011 By 

    (1)