Safe Mode: On
Falkland Islands Oil Could Triple U.K. Reserves

Falkland Islands Oil Could Triple U.K. Reserves


By
Brian Swint
-

Jan 19, 2012 10:07 AM GMT


Thirty years after Margaret Thatcher
fought a 74-day war with Argentina over the Falkland Islands,
the prospect of an oil boom is reviving tensions.
Oil explorers are targeting 8.3 billion barrels in the
waters around the islands this year, three times the U.K.’s
reserves. Borders & Southern Petroleum Plc (BOR) will drill the
Stebbing prospect next month, one of three Falkland wells that
Morgan Stanley ranks among the world’s top 15 offshore prospects
this year. Meanwhile, Rockhopper Exploration Plc (RKH) is seeking $2
billion from a larger oil company to develop the Sea Lion field,
the islands’ first economically viable oil find.

“The area is underexplored and highly prospective,” said
New York-based Morgan Stanley analyst Evan Calio. “These could
be like the high-impact wells in Ghana and Brazil a few years
ago that opened up a whole host of basins.”
A major drilling success will further raise the political
temperature as Argentina maintains its claim over the U.K’s
South Atlantic territory, 300 miles (483 kilometers) from the
Latin American coast. President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner
said Britain is taking her country’s resources, while Thatcher’s
successor David Cameron yesterday accused Argentina of a
“colonialist” attitude that didn’t account for islanders’ rights.
Cameron has approved contingency plans to bolster U.K.
troops on the islands, and Prince William, a search and rescue
pilot and the second in line to the British throne, may spend
six weeks there this year, the Times of London reported today.
Not Negotiable
“We want to have a full and productive relationship with
Argentina,” said Foreign Office spokeswoman Sophie Benger in an
e-mailed response to questions. “Whilst the sovereignty of the
Falklands is not up for negotiation, there is still much we can
do together.”
The world’s largest oil companies like Exxon Mobil Corp.
and Royal Dutch Shell Plc face a dilemma: whether the potential
of a virgin basin outweighs the risk of a worsening
international dispute. While producers with interests in
Argentina, such as BP Plc, may be put off, others will want to
participate, said Tim Bushell, chief executive officer of
Falkland Oil & Gas Ltd. (FOGL), who’s looking for drilling partners.
“Big oil companies are used to dealing with political
risks, and bigger ones than some saber rattling by Argentina,”
Bushell said in a telephone interview, declining to name the
companies he’s talking to. “For every BP, there are other major
companies that don’t have an interest in Argentina.”
The Falkland Island government, which manages the
territory’s mineral rights for the 2,955 islanders, says the big
producers are interested and talking to the companies already
active in the region. Of the five U.K.-based explorers that have
drilled or plan wells, the largest, Rockhopper, has a market
value of 899 million pounds ($1.4 billion).
Patagonian Squid
“The Falklands is at a stage where a big company can take
a large share in what could be a big oil province,” said
Stephen Luxton, the Falkland Islands’ director of mineral
resources. “There is an active program of marketing by the
companies here. There are discussions going on, though we can’t
name names.”
Falkland Oil & Gas plans to drill the Loligo prospect later
this year, a well targeting 4.7 billion barrels of oil. Named
after a Patagonian squid, it’s the second-most prospective well
planned worldwide this year after one in Namibia, according to
Morgan Stanley. The company’s Darwin prospect will follow and
ranks sixth on the U.S. bank’s list.
Borders & Southern will start drilling the Darwin prospect
by the end of January, which seismic surveys suggest may hold as
much as 760 million barrels of oil and 3 trillion cubic feet of
gas. Stebbing, the target of the company’s second well, may hold
as much as 1.2 billion barrels.
New Province
Together, the four wells planned for the Falklands this
year are searching for about 8.3 billion barrels of oil. The
Jubilee field, which was discovered in 2007, propelled Ghana
into one of the world’s top 50 oil states. Brazil’s Lula field,
drilled in 2006, holds an estimated 6.5 billion barrels of oil
equivalent.
“There could be significant volumes down there and it
would open up a new hydrocarbon province,” Borders & Southern
CEO Howard Obee said in an interview. If the first two wells
are successful, “we’d like to do a big drilling program, not
only to appraise what we’d find but also drill up additional
prospects. To do that, we’d need quite a bit of money.”
While the company will probably be able to sell more shares
to determine the size of a discovery in this campaign, it may
have to sell stakes in prospects to develop them, said Tracy Mackenzie, an analyst at broker Brewin Dolphin in Edinburgh.
Borders & Southern holds a 100 percent interest in its fields.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-19/britain-s-oil-grab-in-falkland-islands-seen-tripling-u-k-reserves-energy.html


Added: Jan-19-2012 
By: ElegantDecline
In:
Other News
Tags: Oil, Britain, Argies
Location: Falkland Islands (Malvinas) (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 4800 | Comments: 163 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 5 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Every country in the world is drilling their own fucking oil...except the USA. bent over and taking it in the ass from the left wing enviro nazis democrats.

    Posted Jan-19-2012 By 

    (6)

    • Comment of user 'NaggerHater' has been deleted by moderator!
    • @NaggerHater Keeping it for later? There is a large environmental movement which is very influential in a certain political party. Believe me, energy companies would tap it if they were allowed. Hell, Bush wanted to drill off the coast of Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and the 9th Circuit has ruled against it time after time. Actually they've been trying to drill there since the 80s. Exxon Valdez kind of messed it all up.

      Posted Jan-19-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @VikingRapeSquad Its been your Govt's policy for decades to use Saudi/Gulf oil...the Saudi's have manipulated your by selling it cheap

      But its your own Energy sector that have lobbied, arm-twisted your Govts to keep US dependent on foreign oil

      Nothing to do with Nazi's or socialists pal

      Posted Jan-19-2012 By 

      (-1)

    • @migs1955 BP's screw up can't have helped

      Posted Jan-19-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @ElegantDecline For sure. Now the latest pipeline project is scrapped. Folks are screaming for energy independence and we just keep shooting ourselves in the foot. Oh well, I'm sure the Canadians would be happy to sell to the Chinese. Probably get a better price too. They deserve it.

      Posted Jan-19-2012 By 

      (1)

  • The Falklands belong to the U.K.. If the world just starts letting Argentina take places, they won't stop, until the world stops them.

    Posted Jan-19-2012 By 

    (5)

  • This is great to hear. I had thought that the falklands were dud for oil, until now.

    Posted Jan-19-2012 By 

    (2)

  • hey britain how bout loaning us a few billion barrels,it seems we dont want to drill our own,idiots running the show over here

    Posted Jan-19-2012 By 

    (2)

  • Funny how history, especially war, repeats itself.

    Liveleak sure could use some new naval footage, Argentina....

    Posted Jan-19-2012 By 

    (1)

  • And the prices at the pump will STILL go up every fucking week!!!

    Posted Jan-19-2012 By 

    (1)

  • 74 days, LOL @ Argentina, bring it !

    Posted Jan-19-2012 By 

    (1)

  • good luck with that Argentina...... lol

    Posted Jan-19-2012 By 

    (1)

  • Good for the British...and to all my southamerican Brother defending the Argentinians...

    Here in Chile we dont forget they took all Patagonia from us when we were fighting Peru and Bolivia on 1979 ...then not happy with them those snakes send they navy to invade us on CHRISTMAS NIGHT only to be stopped by a storm and then very next day the mediation of the Pope...

    while still holding their best troop on our south frontier the ARGENTINIANS MILITARY MURDEROUS BASTARDS though they could easily ta More..

    Posted Jan-20-2012 By 

    (1)

  • This is better than the Michael Owen goal in the 1998 World Cup!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFcTVlLj8Q4

    Posted Jan-19-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Comment of user 'FearTheReaper' has been deleted by author!
    • @FearTheReaper

      If the Argentinians are stupid enough, after all our new submarines have not been used in anger. The Falklands have never been part of Argentina, what next they lay claim to Chile? or maybe Brazil
      I do not wish Argentina any malice, but they seem to think we will let them? This time we will know the second they try to move.

      Posted Jan-19-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @skerne Obama has laid the groundwork for conflict by calling them the Malvinas and calling for bilateral talks on sovereignty when sovreignty is already settled in Britain's favor, clearly signalling that he looks favorably Argentina's claims. If their is a war the blood will be on his hands and his pandering to the enemies of his allies.

      Posted Jan-19-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @dorbie Maybe he see his allies in Africa,and south America now,just a thought.

      Posted Jan-19-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @dorbie

      Dorb, i think its usual politics pretend to please one side (sealing a deal for industry) then carry on as normal.
      If argentina as stupid enough to try and take on Typhoons with obsolete aircraft or Vanguard and astute submarines with bathtubs then they will not stand a chance. We know the minute they start a military build up now.

      Posted Jan-19-2012 By 

      (0)

  • Yawn.Cannot see Argentina fighting us again and getting their asses whipped...again. :)

    Bring on the black gold!

    Posted Jan-19-2012 By 

    (0)

  • No matter how much oil Britain has, the price of oil at the pumps will continue to rise.
    I don't think Britain has the strength of arms or will to win another war over there.

    Posted Jan-19-2012 By 

    (0)

    • @markwheatley38

      Doesn't realy mater. Argentine can't afford to win. British subs alone would make the whole affair just too expensive to them. And all that without nukes.

      Posted Jan-19-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @markwheatley38 Yes it will... a cursory glance at British history shows it always has the will to defend its interests

      Posted Jan-19-2012 By 

      (-1)

    • @Sjumppanen heheh nuks.how old are you

      Posted Jan-19-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @ElegantDecline

      "defend its interests"..... more like going to a full war and kill thousands of people over a tiny island, and then having the nerve to call others warmongers for defending their own land from real border hostilities.

      Posted Jan-19-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @aydeo Dimwit, the falklands are within UK territory and it was invaded by a hostile force. No brainer.

      Until that status changes, and I can tell you now the British people en-mass wouldn't let its status change, that is the way it is.

      Posted Jan-19-2012 By 

      (-1)

  • i hope when we leave the falklands all that is left behind for the argies will be sheep

    Posted Jan-19-2012 By 

    (0)

  • This conflict is no different than China trying to 'take back' Taiwan..

    I wonder if Argentina would back off if the oil was shared?

    Posted Jan-19-2012 By 

    (0)