I have previously stated in various comments that I am a Liberal and support gay marriage, and that I oppose any government official interfering with a business based on their expressed religious beliefs or social philosophies. The Constitution, specifically the 1st Amendment, prohibits it. What some people fail to grasp is that the 1st Amendment applies TO GOVERNMENT ACTIVITIES ONLY. It tells us what the government can and cannot do, must and must not allow. It does not tell me, or you, what speech or religious activity we must allow or tolerate or engage in, or not. With all of this in mind I found the following excerpt from a Huffington Post article interesting. And before the rants about the Huff being a liberal rag start, I will concede that it is...even the Huff admits it. But this does NOT change the truth of what this says:
-----------------------
If I hear one more person say that he or she is supporting Chick-fil-A because "This is a First Amendment issue," I'm going to jump out of one of the Huffington Post's fifth-floor windows and swan dive into oncoming traffic.
It seems I can't open Twitter or look at Facebook or read a website without hearing that refrain. It was the chant of many of the Chick-fil-A fans who were in attendance yesterday at "Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day," which was dreamt up by former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee to support "freedom of speech" and President and COO Dan Cathy's right to believe that gay people do not deserve to get married (or -- if you want to dress it up -- "shouldn't be able to redefine traditional marriage"). But make no mistake -- this is not about the First Amendment.
I fully support Cathy's right to say whatever he wants (and, in fact, so does the ACLU). But just because someone can say something doesn't mean they should -- or that we should celebrate him or her for doing so, especially when what they're saying is, at its core, promoting a culture of hate against a group of people.
I have a hard time believing that there would be lines around the block at Burger King if its CEO gave an interview where he or she stated, "I think we are inviting God's judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at Him and say, 'We know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage... black and white people should not be allowed to get married,'" and had also donated millions of dollars to white supremacist organizations.
Similarly, if the head of Taco Bell came out and said, "I pray God's mercy on our generation that has such a prideful, arrogant attitude to think that we have the audacity to try to redefine what marriage is about -- women should be the property of their husbands and anything otherwise is against traditional marriage," I don't think we'd see food courts packed with folks rabidly demanding 10-packs of tacos.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/noah-michelson/chick-fil-a-first-amendment_b_1733305.html
By: gregsto
In: Other News
Tags: chik fil a, first amendment, gay, marriage
Location: United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 3584 | Comments: 123 | Votes: 2 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 3
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
Some Perspective for Chick Fil A Supporters
-
The US Courts Established a Policy Excluding Any Papers Pertaining to Judicial Corruption from the First Amendment Right to File Petitions.
-
Iowa judges' removal emboldens gay marriage foes
-
Chik-Fil-A Appreciation Day
-
Perez Hilton Admits Miss California's Answer on Gay Marriage Cost Her the Crown
-
Chick-Fil-A Appreciation Day
-
ACLU Watches as KingCast and Revere's Clifford Pisano Deliver a First Amendment Smackdown to a Snooty Suffolk County Court Clerk.
-
Geert Wilders to Glenn Beck- Europe needs a First Amendment
-
'Mexico City backs gay marriage in Latin American first'
-
First Legal Gay Marriage in New York State
-
Hateful Liberal Harasses Polite Chick-fil-A Employee




"If I hear one more person say that he or she is supporting Chick-fil-A because "This is a First Amendment issue," I'm going to jump out of one of the Huffington Post's fifth-floor windows and swan dive into oncoming traffic."
This is clearly a 1st amendment issue. The article doesn't even refute that. It's a blind liberal opinion, from somebody who doesn't think people should be legally allowed to think or believe differently than they do.
Posted Aug-2-2012 ByST0N3PONY (5067.72) 
ST0N3PONY View Channel Send Message
(4)
@ST0N3PONY cam up?
Posted Aug-2-2012 Bybuoymarker (573.60) 
buoymarker View Channel Send Message
(0)
@ST0N3PONY
And liberals are freaking the f out. their claims of racism and homophobia don't work anymore
Posted Aug-2-2012 Byaranger45 (2989.48) 
aranger45 View Channel Send Message
(2)
@ST0N3PONY You missed the WHOLE point. Would the crowds at Chik Fil A have been the same if Cathy had said he thinks blacks and whites should not be allowed to marry?
Since supporters are claiming they do so based on free speech concerns, not because of any anti gay issue, would these same supporters have been there if it was a black/white marriage issue? If NOT then this clearly is NOT a 1st amendment issue for them.
Posted Aug-3-2012 Bygregsto (2454.98) 
gregsto View Channel Send Message
(-1)
@gregsto This is America, and a person has the 1st amendment right to be racist if they want to. The crowd wouldn't be as big no, because people would choose to condemn them for their racism (more free expression). You think the Chick Fil A person should go to prison for thinking different from you?
If you don't like it, move to Europe where your masters will toss you in a cell for saying the wrong thing.
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByST0N3PONY (5067.72) 
ST0N3PONY View Channel Send Message
(0)
@gregsto No gregsto you missed the whole point. When government officials retaliate against a CEO expressing his religious beliefs, I strongly object on first amendment grounds, even if I don't agree with the CEO.
Posted Aug-3-2012 Byhdadd (266.10) 
hdadd View Channel Send Message
(0)
@SacredVow
He's just regurgitating what he's told
Posted Aug-2-2012 Byaranger45 (2989.48) 
aranger45 View Channel Send Message
(-2)
@SacredVow You missed the WHOLE point. Would the crowds at Chik Fil A have been the same if Cathy had said he thinks blacks and whites should not be allowed to marry?
Since supporters are claiming they do so based on free speech concerns, not because of any anti gay issue, would these same supporters have been there if it was a black/white marriage issue? If NOT then this clearly is NOT a 1st amendment issue for them.
Note that I started by acknowledging that the mayors were 100% wrong. But i More..
Posted Aug-3-2012 Bygregsto (2454.98) 
gregsto View Channel Send Message
(-1)
@SacredVow Not if you dust off your cerebrum.
Posted Aug-8-2012 Bygregsto (2454.98) 
gregsto View Channel Send Message
(-1)
@gregsto
homosexual bigots are not born homosexual negroes are no matter how many times you spew the scripted propaganda out of Kirk and Madsen's Homosexual Agenda instruct homosexual lying bigots like you to equate homosexual behavior with being negroid.
Posted Aug-25-2012 ByRealityChecker (307.10)

RealityChecker View Channel Send Message
(0)
first, mr. cathy who is 91 years old and was talking to a baptist magazine did state that he believed in the biblical marriage, he did not down gays, he just stated his own beliefs and he has always ran his restaurants with his principles, they are all closed on sundays so his employees can go to church even though he loses alot of revenue.
it seems to be that the gay community looks for any reason to jump on someone just because they have different beliefs. they havent hurt chick fil a busine More..
Posted Aug-3-2012 By-shauna- (49.30) -shauna- View Channel Send Message
(4)
@-shauna- YOUR RIGHT ON!!!!!!!!!!!! Be queer all u want,just stop bullying me with it!!!
Posted Aug-3-2012 Byrbvr1 (375.54) 
rbvr1 View Channel Send Message
(1)
@rbvr1 you're*
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByKutKorners (545.20)

KutKorners View Channel Send Message
(0)
@-shauna- You have no clue what you are talking about. Cathy is not 91, you are thinking of his father perhaps. He appears to be in his 50's.
He most certainly did 'down' gays:
Appearing on “The Ken Coleman Show,” Cathy spoke of his company’s pride in its socially conservative character, but then offered an assessment of same-sex marriage that might lose the popular fast food chain a few customers.
“I think we are inviting God’s judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at him a More..
Posted Aug-3-2012 Bygregsto (2454.98) 
gregsto View Channel Send Message
(-2)
@-shauna-
That's because homosexual bigots are narrow minded, intolerant, venomous, mean spirited, wrong headed, heterophobic, Christian bashing, xenophobic libtard, hate mongering homosexist ignorant bigot.
Posted Aug-5-2012 ByRealityChecker (307.10)

RealityChecker View Channel Send Message
(0)
@gregsto
You're a narrow minded, intolerant, venomous, mean spirited, wrong headed, heterophobic, Christian bashing, xenophobic libtard, hate mongering homosexist ignorant bigots.
Posted Aug-5-2012 ByRealityChecker (307.10)

RealityChecker View Channel Send Message
(-1)
Rahm Emmanuel and Boston Mayor Thomas Menino are government officials. They are not allowed to retaliate against a private citizen for exercising his right of free speech to express his religious belief.
So, yeah, you're absolutely wrong. Please jump out the window. Thanks.
And please stop equating homosexual marriage with mixed-race marriage. The last time I checked, a mixed-race couple could procreate. Some people still think marriage and reproduction are related. Quaint, huh?
Posted Aug-3-2012 Byhdadd (266.10) 
hdadd View Channel Send Message
(4)
It is a First Amendment issue...now jump.
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByJarhead 2234 (122.60) 
Jarhead 2234 View Channel Send Message
(3)
The more commentary I hear on this issue the more I see people do not really understand the real issue.
Oh well, carry on.
Posted Aug-3-2012 By-stile- (697.20) 
-stile- View Channel Send Message
(2)
To the poster: Anybody that has a problem with anybody's support for traditional marriage is a hater! BECAUSE I SAID SO ASSWIPE!!!
Posted Aug-4-2012 ByJohn Coleman (192.70) 
John Coleman View Channel Send Message
(2)
So just because he stated that opposses the stupid gays from marrying that means that he should be censored?
Idiot liberals.
Posted Aug-3-2012 Byconservative hispanic (951.10) 
conservative hispanic View Channel Send Message
(2)
@conservative hispanic
Homophobic, brainwashed bigot...
Posted Aug-3-2012 BySilentscoper (114.76) 
Silentscoper View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Silentscoper
Like the idiots homosexual activists that make threats? IF that's the case, then I take your comment as a complement.
Posted Aug-3-2012 Byconservative hispanic (951.10) 
conservative hispanic View Channel Send Message
(0)
@conservative hispanic
It wasn't a compliment, mearly a reflection of the fact that you're a hateful twat, that thinks himself superior, when you are simply a deluded, bigoted Cunt.
Posted Aug-3-2012 BySilentscoper (114.76) 
Silentscoper View Channel Send Message
(2)
@conservative hispanic You really need a spell check system for your postings.
I bet you use IE, don't ya?
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByKutKorners (545.20)

KutKorners View Channel Send Message
(0)
@conservative hispanic WHO said he should be censored? WTF are you talking about???
Posted Aug-3-2012 Bygregsto (2454.98) 
gregsto View Channel Send Message
(0)
we didnt build 'chic-fila' the govt. did....and they'll crush it.....
Posted Aug-2-2012 Bybuoymarker (573.60) 
buoymarker View Channel Send Message
(2)
Think like a Lib, act like a Lib, be like a Lib or you will pay in every conceivable way. These people have come unhinged because a company supports traditional marriage, which is somehow reprehensible to gays, who only came to be human because someone's parents did the bone dance. Get over yourselves and get a life.
Posted Aug-2-2012 Byyorba (1021.48) yorba View Channel Send Message
(2)
@yorba
Define traditional marriage for us please,because from what I see today,the traditional marriage consists of 2 fucking idiots making vows to God to be life partners and stay together through good or bad,eventually getting a divorce by year 3 and clogging up the courts because the gonads,not logic or common sense,got them hitched in the first place.
Posted Aug-2-2012 ByMuscledoctor (236.38) 
Muscledoctor View Channel Send Message
(-2)
@Muscledoctor Between a male and a female. Whether they are shallow, stupid, or ignorant is not part of the definition or equation. Gays divorce, but it's usually settled over anal beads and butt plugs so it's not such a big thing.
Posted Aug-2-2012 Byyorba (1021.48) yorba View Channel Send Message
(2)
@Muscledoctor Traditional marriage is short for Holy matrimony. Which is only a reference or term from the bible, this is where it came from. In which they believed was only between a man and a woman and only to procreate. Regardless of the tossers that are clueless in our society of even maintaining a functioning family. Hence the term Civil union for gays, for you would have to redefine the word Marriage or Holy matrimony . This is why people dislike most liberals, they attempt to redefine eve More..
Posted Aug-2-2012 Bydankmofo (481.54) 
dankmofo View Channel Send Message
(2)
@Americanalltheway
Makes too much sense for the stupid liberals.
Posted Aug-3-2012 Byconservative hispanic (951.10) 
conservative hispanic View Channel Send Message
(1)
I don't understand OPs argument. This IS a first amendment issue. The dude should be able to say whatever the fuck he wants and vocalize his own political opinions regardless of what position he holds in financial standing. I fully support gay marriage and gay rights and all that but I also fully support free expression of political ideology no matter how flawed it is.
Posted Aug-2-2012 Bylucidx1 (959.00) 
lucidx1 View Channel Send Message
(2)
@lucidx1 You missed the WHOLE point. Would the crowds at Chik Fil A have been the same if Cathy had said he thinks blacks and whites should not be allowed to marry?
Since supporters are claiming they do so based on free speech concerns, not because of any anti gay issue, would these same supporters have been there if it was a black/white marriage issue? If NOT then this clearly is NOT a 1st amendment issue for them.
THAT is the point. YES it IS a 1st amendment issue at its core...but those cl More..
Posted Aug-3-2012 Bygregsto (2454.98) 
gregsto View Channel Send Message
(-2)
@gregsto
No, even if he said he didn't support interracial marriage I would still support and defend him because he should be allowed to express his ideology.
Posted Aug-3-2012 Bylucidx1 (959.00) 
lucidx1 View Channel Send Message
(0)
@lucidx1 From your own couch maybe....but I bet you would not run down to the Chik Fil A for a 'support CFA day'. I would absolutely defend his right to say what he wants, and to be free from government interference no matter what....as I have said over and over....but you cannot, with a straight face, claim this same amount of in person support would be seen. The gay issue is the draw...the 1st amendment claims are 'free speech when it comes to anti gay messages'...NOT free speech per se. Or ar More..
Posted Aug-8-2012 Bygregsto (2454.98) 
gregsto View Channel Send Message
(-1)
@gregsto
Those who choose homosexuality are not the same as those who are born negro, hence the motive for homos claiming they were born that way as scripted by Homosexual agenda psy-ops manifesto creators Kirk and Madsen, so we see you're following the propaganda script. Nice try you hate mongering psychotic heterophobic bigot.
Posted Aug-25-2012 ByRealityChecker (307.10)

RealityChecker View Channel Send Message
(0)
"It is a first amendment issue" now jump retard
Posted Aug-3-2012 Bydietcokesucks (887.80) 
dietcokesucks View Channel Send Message
(2)
Ah, but this has become a First Amendment issue because we've had public officials in cities like Boston and Chicago state that Chik-Fil-A was no longer welcome to do business in their cities. This is government attempting to discriminate against a company based on the free speech of the company's CEO.
If gay rights supporters want to rally against Chik-Fil-A, more power to them. It's their right to free speech. If the Chik-Fil-A CEO wants to rally against gay marriage, it's his right to fre More..
Posted Aug-3-2012 Bybuzzardist (362.74) 
buzzardist View Channel Send Message
(1)
1st admendment rocks! FUCK LIBTARDS AND THE BUTTHURT QUEERS!
Posted Aug-2-2012 Byelmerfudd13 (2100.50)

elmerfudd13 Send Message
(1)
@elmerfudd13 You are consistently moronic in your comments.
Posted Aug-3-2012 Bygregsto (2454.98) 
gregsto View Channel Send Message
(-1)
@gregsto
You're consistently moronic in your hate speech and you're a heterophobic, hate mongering, intolerant, narrow mined, mean spirited, wrong headed, Christian bashing, fascist homosexist bigot.
Posted Aug-25-2012 ByRealityChecker (307.10)

RealityChecker View Channel Send Message
(0)
Another excerpt from the Homosexual Agenda the bigoted homosexual jihadist hate movement is deploying:
“….by conversion [toward public acceptance of homosexuality] we mean something far more profoundly threatening to the American Way of Life, without which no truly sweeping social change can occur. We mean conversion of the average American’s emotions, mind, and will, through a planned psychological attack, in the form of propaganda fed to the nation via the media.” - Kirk & Madsen More..
Posted Aug-5-2012 ByRealityChecker (307.10)

RealityChecker View Channel Send Message
(1)