Found this article, your thoughts ?....
To help make sense of the Facebook IPO, we caught up with Steve Blank,
a professor at Berkeley and Stanford and serial entrepreneur from
Silicon Valley. This conversation has been edited and condensed.
THOMPSON: What does the Facebook IPO mean for Silicon Valley?
I think it's the beginning of the end of the valley as we know it.
Silicon Valley historically would invest in science, and technology,
and, you know, actual silicon. If you were a good VC you could make $100
million. Now there's a new pattern created by two big ideas. First, for
the first time ever, you have computer devices, mobile and tablet
especially, in the hands of billions of people. Second is that we are
moving all the social needs that we used to do face-to-face, and we're
doing them on a computer. And this trend has just begun. If you
think Facebook is the end, ask MySpace. Art, entertainment, everything
you can imagine in life is moving to computers. Companies like Facebook
for the first time can get total markets approaching the entire
THOMPSON: That all sounds pretty good for Facebook, actually.
BLANK: For Facebook, it's spectacular. But Silicon Valley is screwed as we know it.
If I have a choice of investing in a blockbuster cancer drug that will pay
me nothing for ten years, at best, whereas social media will go big in
two years, what do you think I'm going to pick? If you're a VC firm,
you're tossing out your life science division. All of that stuff is hard
and the returns take forever. Look at social media. It's not hard,
because of the two forces I just described, and the returns are quick. THOMPSON:
Half the tech and innovation world seems to think this is just evidence
that we're in the middle of a dot-com remix. You disagree?BLANK:
In the last bubble, venture capitalists went into a frenzy if anything
had an ear and eye. I don't think this a bubble. I think the valuations
are a bit of a bubble, but social media is real.
THOMPSON: Is Facebook worth $100 billion?
In the last bubble there were no customers. Facebook makes $4 per user.
The users are customers. They produce real revenue. Nobody's debating
whether Facebook can make money. They're debating how much more valuable
Facebook's hundreds of millions of users can be, and how fast can they
can grow that value. That's an execution problem.
THOMPSON: But you think Silicon Valley is screwed, whether Facebook lives up to that valuation or not. Why?
I teach science and engineering. I see my students trying to
commercialize really hard stuff. But the VCs are only going to be
interested in chasing the billions on their smart phones. Thank God we
have small business research grants from the federal government,
otherwise the Chinese would just grab them.
THOMPSON: But there are some people doing interesting, daring things, like Vinod Khosla.
He is. But think about this. The four most interesting projects in the
last five years are Tesla, SpaceX, Google Driving, and Google Goggles.
That is one individual, Elon Musk, and one company, Google, doing all
four things that are truly Silicon Valley-class disruptive.
THOMPSON: Does this represent a large-scale failure among venture capitalists in the Valley?
BLANK: It's not like anybody is doing evil or bad. It's like what Willie Sutton said: Social media is just "where the money is."
THOMPSON: What's the fix?
BLANK: I don't know what the fix is. Thank God for federal government grants, and the NIH, and Musk, and Google.
THOMPSON: So is American innovation simply doomed, or is it more complicated than that?
The headline for me here is that Facebook's success has the unintended
consequence of leading to the demise of Silicon Valley as a place where
investors take big risks on advanced science and tech that helps the
world. The golden age of Silicon valley is over and we're dancing on its
grave. On the other hand, Facebook is a great company. I feel
|Liveleak on Facebook|