Safe Mode: On
Veterans seek class action lawsuit for disability payments

The father of a young Canadian soldier wounded in Afghanistan says a
legal challenge seeking fairer compensation for wounded veterans could
soon become a class action lawsuit.
Jim Scott of Surrey, B.C., claims wounded soldiers are losing out on
help when they're paid lump sum settlements, rather than ongoing
benefits.
Scott's son, Dan, was 24 years old and on his second tour of duty in
Afghanistan in 2010 when he was hit by part of a mine during a friendly
fire incident that killed a friend and fellow soldier.'If
it was just for him, I wouldn't be pursuing this, but the issue was a
lot of soldiers came back with injuries which are much more
[debilitating] than my son's.'—Jim Scott, father of wounded soldierHis
son received just over $40,000 for his injuries, but Scott claims some
of them weren't covered after the federal government changed
compensation with the New Veterans Charter in 2006.
"He got nothing for his spleen, nothing for his pancreas and a small settlement for his kidney."


"If it was just for him, I wouldn't be pursuing this, but the issue
was a lot of soldiers came back with injuries which are much more
[debilitating] than my son's. In other words, they're lower-leg
injuries, pins and rods put in their legs, or they're missing parts of
their legs and so on. And they have had very low settlements."
Edmonton veteran Mark Campbell, who lost both his legs in Afghanistan, has also joined the lawsuit. Campbell says while he has adjusted to his injuries, he says he wasn’t prepared for the fight to get his benefits.


He says the changes mean soldiers wounded after 2006 would receive
cuts of around 40 per cent to their lifetime benefits. He fears it would
have the greatest impact on younger soldiers who find themselves
wounded.Society seeks fairer compensationJim Scott says
too many soldiers are not getting enough financial compensation for
their injuries, and that is why he is trying to launch the class action.
"The soldiers were right. They still come up significantly
short-changed, even when you add up all the benefit programs which are
being announced by the government."
After talking to other veterans and studying all the benefits
advertised by Ottawa, Scott founded the Equitas Disabled Soldiers
Funding Society to seek fairer compensation for the veterans.
Vancouver law firm Miller Thomson took up the case on a pro bono basis earlier this year
and plans to have the paperwork filed by the end of the month with the
B.C. Supreme Court, with the intention of having it certified as a class
action, said Scott.Lump sums replaced pensions for lifeFor
many decades, an injured war veteran from Canada received a pension for
life. But since the implementation of the New Veterans Charter six
years ago, the monthly disability payments were replaced with a one-time
payment to a maximum of $276,089.
According to the Veterans Affairs Canada website, the revised charter
“shifts the focus from a lifetime of disability to encouraging
‘wellness.’”
Michael Blais, founder and president of Canadian Veterans Advocacy, says the lump-sum payment can actually harm an injured soldier, who would receive a large amount of money at a time when he or she may not be equipped to deal with it.


A monthly pension gives veterans of all ages long-term financial
security, making it easier for them to get loans, he points out.





http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/story/2012/10/23/bc-veterans-disability-compensation.html

 
Poll

Added: Oct-23-2012 Occurred On: Oct-23-2012
By: Hiarken
In:
Regional News
Tags: Canadian Armed Forces, veterans, disabled, government, pensions
Location: Canada (load item map)
Views: 999 | Comments: 12 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
'
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • "Michael Blais, founder and president of Canadian Veterans Advocacy, says the lump-sum payment can actually harm an injured soldier, who would receive a large amount of money at a time when he or she may not be equipped to deal with it.

    I love how they think for you.

    Posted Oct-23-2012 By 

    (2) | Report

  • Comment of user 'DirtyUncleBerty' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • We have all kinds of crazy charts for US vets
    50% disabled w/spouse and 1 child $931 per month
    100% disabled w/spouse and 1 child $3,037 per month.

    Posted Oct-23-2012 By 

    (1) | Report

    • @klark kent I'd like to know who defines the criteria for these charts,ie: Veterans or some paper pushing pussies whose only contribution is coming up with funky looking pie charts, bitchin' sliding scale algorithms, and wearing BDUs on casual wear Fridays.

      It's obvious they have no fucking idea what they are doing.

      Posted Oct-23-2012 By 

      (1) | Report

    • Comment of user 'Amusing' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @Amusing I know.

      It was a purely rhetorical question.

      Posted Oct-23-2012 By 

      (1) | Report

    • @Hiarken
      Not sure, but if there's no income tax, then that can go a lot farther. Hopefully, the VA continues to cover their medical care, so it is some sort of 'full package'.

      I'm sure suits decide, but, to be fair, if you let the vets decide it would be one million per person.. so it's a hard call either way. :(
      FYI: My uncle got killed in Viet Nam in 1968. My grandmother got $600. sigh.

      Posted Oct-23-2012 By 

      (1) | Report

  • Go for the maximum payout, as it is tax free you do not have to fund it.

    Posted Oct-23-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

  • Scummy of the Canadians to do this. Then again I don't know how this matches up to other nations and what the UK or the USA does.

    Posted Oct-23-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

  • Comment of user 'OTT' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • Comment of user 'Amusing' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!