Safe Mode: On
"The Law Goes After Joe Arpaio, The Most Abusive Sheriff In America"

You have probably heard of the shamelessly self professed "Toughest Sheriff in America", Maricopa County Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio. For years he has been making a PR spectacle of himself, all the while running an unconstitutionally deplorable jail system, letting inmates die under tortuous conditions, and violating the civil rights and liberties of everybody in sight, especially minorities. Last week, the House Judiciary Committee made public a critical and public step to rein in the Most Abusive Sheriff In America.

*****

From the HJC press release:

"WASHINGTON – House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers, Jr. (D-Mich.), and Immigration Subcommittee Chairwoman Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), Constitution Subcommittee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), and Crime Subcommittee Chairman Bobby Scott (D-Va.) called on Attorney General Eric Holder and Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano to investigate allegations of misconduct by Maricopa County (Arizona) Sheriff Joe Arpaio.

Sheriff Arpaio has repeatedly demonstrated disregard for the rights of Hispanics in the Phoenix metropolitan area. Under the guise of immigration enforcement, his staff has conducted raids in residential neighborhoods in a manner condemned by the community as racial profiling. On February 4, 2009, Arpaio invited the media to view the transfer of immigrant detainees to a segregated area of his "tent city" jail, subjecting the detainees to public display and "ritual humiliation." Persistent actions such as these have resulted in numerous lawsuits; while Arpaio spends time and energy on publicity and his reality television show, "Smile… You’re Under Arrest!", Maricopa County has paid millions of dollars in settlements involving dead or injured inmates.

"Racial profiling and segregation are simply not acceptable." said Conyers. "Media stunts and braggadocio are no substitute for fair and effective law enforcement."

"The basic premise of our justice system is that people are innocent until proven otherwise," said Rep. Zoe Lofgren. "I’m concerned that in Maricopa County that basic premise appears to have been turned upside down and that Latino members of community are considered "undocumented" until proven otherwise. That’s not how our Constitution works and it’s time for the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security to take a closer look."

"We cannot tolerate vigilantes using the police power to violate the fundamental rights of anyone they can get their hands on," said Nadler. "Sheriff Arpaio has consistently abused his office in violation of federal law. It is time for the federal government to step in and uphold the rule of law in this country, even in Maricopa County." "Law enforcement is not a game or a reality show, it is a public trust," said Scott. "There is no excuse for callous indifference to the rights of the residents of Arizona, whether in their neighborhoods or as pretrial detainees.""

*****

It is high time that somebody on the national scene notice, and the Federal government take action on, the egregious and violative conduct of Joe Arpaio.

(http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/126986/finally%2C_the_law_goes_after_joe_arpaio_--_the_most_abusive_sheriff_in_america/)


Click to view image: 'thumbnail'

Added: Feb-17-2009 
By: Smitten_Kitten
In:
News
Tags: toughest sherif in america, maricopa county arizona, sheriff joe arpaio, unconstitutional, violation of human rights, abuse of the law, abusive, sheriff, HJC, house judiciary committee,
Marked as: approved
Views: 9864 | Comments: 91 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 1 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Liberals will always hate him, just as they hate anyone who stands up against criminal degenerates.

    Posted Feb-17-2009 By 

    (18)

    • Criminal degenerates?
      Who are you to say?
      Typical drivel from you pony, this isn't a liberal vs conservative issue, it is about abusing power and the law. This chump has done stuff that will now be looked over because what he did is obviously questionable regarding very simple law. To say liberals don't regard law is really a pathetic statement and has no basis for you to drivel except you're hatred of liberals.

      Posted Feb-17-2009 By 

      (-12)

    • "We cannot tolerate vigilantes using the police power to violate the fundamental rights of anyone they can get their hands on,"

      No ponyboy, this chump sheriff is the criminal degenerate, you're so blinded by your hatred of anything liberal you can't see this is about abuse by law enforcement.

      Posted Feb-17-2009 By 

      (-10)

    • "Who are you to say?"

      I'm a civilized American, entitled to an opinion whether you idiot leftists like it or not. Sorry. The people with the say, more specifically in this case, are the judges and police officers who picked up your cherished oppressed criminal degenerates leeches.

      "this isn't a liberal vs conservative issue"

      Yeah it is. You stand up for these criminals like you stand up for all criminals. Because you just don't know any better.

      Posted Feb-17-2009 By 

      (12)

    • Who are you to say.....was meant to ask you why you call people degenerates. You're just spouting off and not providing anything but drivel.

      I've stood up for these criminals??
      Where exactly can you show any evidence of that delusional garbage??
      You can't. I've never stood up for criminals, I just want to see everyone treated equal like the constitution says, pretty simple really!

      Again, this is about abusive law enforcement, this is America.

      Posted Feb-17-2009 By 

      (-10)

    • Who am I to say? I'm not a socialist tool like yourself. Which means I don't condone and excuse and rationalize criminal behavior, and I'm not motivated by that retarded ideology that encourages you to pretend that people being forced to wear pink to stop them from stealing clothes is cruel and unusual.

      That's what moron lefists in the ACLU are for, to defend the lowest of the low. That's what people like you are for, to whine and cry for oppressed criminals who you think should be allowed to More..

      Posted Feb-17-2009 By 

      (9)

  • I guess he should just join the rest of the spineles yes men in coddling violent criminals and making sure the have their porn and smokes. After all they have rights, correct? I don't think constitutional rights should be upheld for those who have no regard for the law they want to protect them. This is just retarded. Go Joe!

    Posted Feb-17-2009 By 

    (17)

  • Yeah, because criminals getting cable tv, and plasma tv's in their cell makes more sense. They are being punished, they should have to live in those kinds of conditions that he provides. They need more people like him.

    Posted Feb-17-2009 By 

    (7)

    • Who is they?

      Posted Feb-17-2009 By 

      (-6)

    • Didn't you see that last article that people like Willy were up in arms about? He made them walk!!! That's unconstitutional!

      Are you some kind of cruel sadist? They were forced to wear pink, and they had to walk! WALK!!! It took like 15 whole minutes for them to get from one site to another! That is a fate worse than death! I wouldn't wish that on my worst enemy!

      A pleasant fresh-air stroll that took about 15 minutes?! My God... It's the trail of tears all over again. When will the ACLU swoop More..

      Posted Feb-17-2009 By 

      (7)

    • Yes, it is unconstitutional for a sheriff to do that.
      He can't just parade people around, he doesn't make the rules about punishment the courts do.
      Obviously you know next to nothing about law. Every post you make that becomes more evident.

      Posted Feb-17-2009 By 

      (-7)

    • Waaaaaa! Waaaaaaa! Waaaaaaa! Waaaaaaaa! Waaaaaaaa!

      Posted Feb-17-2009 By 

      (4)

    • Like I said, you know nothing about equality and justice. Very basic things in the law.
      Your juvenile answer speaks volumes about your ignorance.

      Posted Feb-17-2009 By 

      (-4)

  • How the fuck do you get in trouble for profiling Hispanics when you are raiding to find illegal Mexicans? How does that shit work ?

    Posted Feb-17-2009 By 

    (6)

    • because you can't just raid a house because theres a bunch of mexicans living there....just because they are mexican, and theres a bunch of them in one house, doesn't mean they are illegal and you can just kick in the door anytime you want. This is America. We are supposed to be "secure in our papers and property from unlawful search and seizure"
      Does that only apply to certain skin colors???

      Posted Feb-17-2009 By 

      (1)

  • It would certainly be wrong if the sheriff was conducting illegal searches. But I haven't heard anything about that. It doesn't make much sense to me because it would be easy enough for him to get a search warrant. I'm sure there are plenty of judges who would cooperate with him. And from what I understand, it's not as if he's been falsely arresting lots of Hispanics who are in the country legally. The vast majority of the people he has arrested in these sweeps are illegal immigrants and ma More..

    Posted Feb-17-2009 By 

    (5)

  • Go Joe

    Posted Feb-17-2009 By 

    (5)

  • I have not heard about any specific acts by this sheriff which I found troubling. Yes, he likes to grandstand. But so what? The fact is that the citizens love him. And ultimately, his job is to deal with criminals. I'm not saying that it would okay to torture them or violate their civil rights. But frankly, I don't give a f*ck if they're uncomfortable or embarassed by pink uniforms or any other minor complaint. So they don't get to watch TV all day. Boo hoo. They are CRIMINALS.

    Posted Feb-17-2009 By 

    (5)

  • Funny that all those demoNcrats are going after a Republican!
    Who would have thought.....

    Posted Feb-18-2009 By 

    (4)

  • Stop trying to have an intelligent conversation with a liberal it is impossible. Liberalism is a disease the lack of use of the brain. They do not have the capacity to understand what they are doing or talking about. We need government to step in and save them LMFAO LMFAO. The mind is a terrible thing to waste.

    Posted Feb-17-2009 By 

    (4)

  • seems the dems can't get him voted out, so now they try their hammers...
    bunch of whiners trying to remove a sheriff, many of whom are likely criminals themselves and afraid they might end up at the sheriffs hotel....

    Posted Feb-17-2009 By 

    (4)

  • If you don't want to do the time. DON'T DO THE CRIME!

    Posted Feb-17-2009 By 

    (3)

    • You don't get it either do you?
      Fine with me to do the time, but a sheriff has no right to come up with the punishment. That is the job of the courts.

      Posted Feb-17-2009 By 

      (-1)

    • Oh, I see. I'll do my time, but only if it's at a plush Country Club. With a Golf course and a 4 star restaurant!
      Jail time is PUNUSHMENT!

      Posted Feb-17-2009 By 

      (3)

    • Who said anything about plush??
      You!!
      It is about equal justice not all these canards you ans stoned pony are driveling about.

      Posted Feb-17-2009 By 

      (-2)

  • I support Joe 110%

    Posted Feb-17-2009 By 

    (3)

  • Power tripping.

    Posted Feb-17-2009 By 

    (2)

  • "...John Conyers, Jr. (D-Mich.), and Immigration Subcommittee Chairwoman Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), Constitution Subcommittee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), and Crime Subcommittee Chairman Bobby Scott (D-Va.)..."

    Four of the biggest moonbats in Congress....

    Posted Feb-17-2009 By 

    (2)

    • And not one of them from Arizona....

      Since when is making criminals pay for their crimes a bad thing? You libturds just hate to see anyone be held accountable. If someone stands up against illegal immigration they are labled racist. It is sad that the criminals, illegals and terrorists have more rights than the good law abiding citizens of this country thanks to the libturds. Laws need to be enforced and criminals held accountable.

      We need more Sherrif Joes in this country.

      Posted Feb-17-2009 By 

      (3)

    • Hear, hear, very good comment, the world would be a better place if we had more Joe's around doing the job they are paid to do, as he says this is not the Ritz Hotel, if you don't like it,,,,,, Don't come back!.

      Posted Feb-18-2009 By 

      (1)

  • Comment of user 'DaveEngland' has been deleted by moderator!