Safe Mode: On
2nd Amendment: Boston and D.C. Gun Grabbing Schemes Fizzle

3/26/2008- It’s not working, much to the displeasure of the Boston cops.

“Boston police officials, surprised by intense opposition from residents, have significantly scaled back and delayed the start of a program that would allow officers to go into people’s homes and search for guns without a warrant,” reports the Boston Globe. “The program, dubbed Safe Homes, was supposed to start in December, but has been delayed at least three times because of misgivings in the community. March 1 was the latest missed start date.”

It should be dubbed homes outside the purview of the Fourth Amendment. But thankfully some residents and community groups have a handle on the scheme, designed to get people accustomed to surrendering their liberty. “One community group has been circulating a petition against the plan. Police officials trying to assuage residents’ fears have been drowned out by criticism at some meetings with residents and elected officials.”

“Police would ask parents or legal guardians for permission to search homes where juveniles ages 17 and under are believed to be holding illegal guns,” the Globe continues. “Police would only enter homes into which they have been invited and, once inside, would only search the rooms of the juveniles.”

Bostonians are not buying it, though. It is not so much the flimsy rules about what is to be searched. It is rather the very idea of allowing police to enter without justification coupled with a search warrant issued by a judge.

Meanwhile, in the District of Criminals, the cops are having difficulty with an anti-Fourth Amendment scheme of their own. “D.C. police are going door-to-door Monday in one of the city’s crime-plagued neighborhoods, asking residents for permission to search their homes for guns and other illegal contraband,” reports ABC News 7. “The program, called the Safe Homes Initiative, will offer homeowners and renters limited amnesty for possessing any contraband found by police.”

Notice the identical name with the striking difference that the district scheme will snoop out “other illegal contraband” as well. Of course, this could be almost anything in your home, epsecially considering the fact police departments now strive to hire cops with the IQ average of a dullard, unable to tell rosemary from marijunana and table salt from cocaine.

In an effort to soften people up — in other words, brainwash those least able to resist, the kids — the D.C. police “department initiated its program by distributing literature at police stations and Boys and Girls Clubs to gauge public interest. It plans to begin the searches in two weeks.”

“Police spokeswoman Traci Hughes said the Safe Home program attempts to reach parents or guardians who think or know their children have guns and will offer amnesty for certain gun- and drug-possession charges,” reports the Washington Times.

For “certain gun- and drug-possession charges,” in short for none, as the point will be to show off the program’s smashing success and the number of criminals apprehended.

In response, the ACLU dispatched workers to hand out window signs. “To the Police: NO CONSENT TO SEARCH OUR HOME,” the signs declare.

Of course, this will surely anger the police and the government, under orders to induce compliance and obedience in the masses, beginning with the children at their Boys and Girls Clubs. As Orwell knew, subserviance to the state begins with the little ones.

“D.C. Council member Marion Barry said the plan violates the Fourth Amendment, which bars illegal search and seizure. He also said it infringes on parental responsibility.”

It looks like our rulers will have to go back to the drawing table on this one. Or they may be obliged to engineer another 9/11 or Katrina event to break down the will of the people, most who simply want to be left alone without police intervention and the intrusions of the state.

Loading the player ...
Embed Code
Plays: 8215 (Embed: 0)

Added: Mar-26-2008 
By: Illuminated1234
In:
News
Tags: 2nd Amendment, searches, gun, grabbing, Boston, DC, nwo, resist, unconstitutional, 4th amendmant, unreasonable, search, seizures
Marked as: approved
Views: 9840 | Comments: 23 | Votes: 3 | Favorites: 2 | Shared: 2 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • NO! This is bullshit! I hope Boston still has the same spirit of resistance they showed when they upended the tea into the harbor. A police state, it's not coming it's already here. It's getting worse and worse.

    Posted Mar-26-2008 By 

    (6)

  • "We gotta get guns off the street"

    I would like to pose the question. When you exchange money or goods for a gun buyback program, how many of those guns do you figure would eventually become misused? These programs are as futile as the war on drugs. Real criminals don't trade in their weapon for sneakers.

    Posted Mar-26-2008 By 

    (4)

    • Most guns turned in are junk. I know many that turn in guns that they know are worth less than they will get from the stupid buy back people and get more $$ than if they sold gun legally.You can make big $$ off them! Gun buybacks are a farse.

      Posted Oct-24-2008 By 

      (0)

  • A hypothetical followed by a question:

    Lets say there are 10 houses on a block. Of those 10 houses 9 of them allow the police to enter and search their homes, and remove all guns. The 10th house legally refuses. NOW...It just so happens that the 10th house is owned by a criminal who has a shat load of weapons.

    Now the question is...When the police leave, who is in control of that block??

    Follow the Constitution you twits, and stop thinking you have a better solution to the issue.

    Posted Mar-26-2008 By 

    (3)

  • You stance on this issue is as it usually is: excellent.

    Why do so many want to voluntarily disempower themselves? That is a true enigma to me. My only far reaching explanation is that this is the leader follower complex. 98% of all people being genetically predisposed to follow leadership rather than to lead. Perhaps they don't trust themselves with power. It is a liberal concept to forcibly spread wealth (one I disagree with) yet these same people do not want to spread POWER. That the More..

    Posted Mar-26-2008 By 

    (3)

  • driedjello: "NO! This is bullshit! I hope Boston still has the same spirit of resistance they showed when they upended the tea into the harbor. A police state, it's not coming it's already here. It's getting worse and worse.
    "
    What the hell is the lady in maroon saying. All I can hear from her is Bahhh Baaahh Baahhh, fuken sheep. Get guns off the streets, right!! LMFAO That is the best joke of the day! Get real people, seriously! I love it when this dumb bitch says it has nothing More..

    Posted Mar-26-2008 By 

    (3)

  • Matthew Rosengart absolutely nailed it here and Jeanine Pirro is about as dumb as they come if she cannot see the infringement to the 4th amendment. Sorry Pirro, a law Professor 'trumps' a former DA.

    It's interesting that she is a republican that ran for senate against Clinton and was quoted as saying "I campaigned ... the west end of New York, bordering on Ohio" - you would think someone born in New York would know the adjacent states ... LMAO.

    Posted Mar-26-2008 By 

    (3)

  • you wont see them go to the ghetto and ask to search houses.

    Posted Mar-26-2008 By 

    (2)

  • What exactly is a "buyback" program considering they didn't own them in the first place?

    Posted Mar-26-2008 By 

    (2)

  • if they find a body on the gun they find in your house your ass is going to jail.fisrt they take your dna without consent then they tell you they want to search your house for guns.

    Posted Mar-26-2008 By 

    (2)

  • sirgrim: "you wont see them go to the ghetto and ask to search houses."
    Once they see it's all good, green light on stepping on the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, they won't ask anything!! Know what I mean!!

    Posted Mar-26-2008 By 

    (2)

  • TheRyz: "What exactly is a "buyback" program considering they didn't own them in the first place?"
    lol, no shit

    Posted Mar-26-2008 By 

    (2)

  • the NWO is here...they are testing society to see what we'll allow. Turn off your televisions people we are being conditioned and TV is the means.

    Posted Mar-26-2008 By 

    (1)

  • POLICE STATE.

    Posted Mar-26-2008 By 

    (1)

  • This is way too scary. A little bit at a time, a little piece at a time, we are losing our freedoms, our rights.

    Even if this does not go through, it's scary to think and to see that this way of thinking is becoming more and more prominent.

    Posted Mar-27-2008 By 

    (1)

  • This isn't about guns! It's about letting cops search your place without any reason. This is going way to far. Resist Boston, I can send tea if you need...

    Posted Mar-26-2008 By 

    (1)