Safe Mode: On
12-09-16 Preliminary Review of the electronic records of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom is a unique example, since it was established only in recent years, following a constitutional reform. It started its work in 2009, well after system security, server certification, and electronic signature standards in electronic records had already been established in the computing field. Yet, the server of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom is uncertified and the records are unsigned and uncertified. A sample of one Judgment shows a discrepancy of almost a month between the date inscribed on the record itself and the date it was in fact created. The United Kingdom, is no doubt, one of the pillars of the legal/banking fraud pandemic, starting with positioning of the major banks in the City of London, a Free City since the Middle Ages, outside the sovereignty of the Queen... The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom followed the footsteps of the courts of the United States, which established fraudulent electronic record systems a decade or two earlier.


A
brand new Supreme Court, with all newly sworn Lord Justices,
established a fraudulent electronic record system from the get go.

View the complete PDF: http://www.scribd.com/doc/106077048/


Added: Sep-16-2012 Occurred On: Sep-16-2012
By: HumanRightsAlert
In:
Conspiracy, Propaganda
Tags: Supreme Court, United Kingdom, Fraud
Location: Barcelona, Cataluna, Spain (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 570 | Comments: 4 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • of for fuck ske you again...are you not fuckin dead yet.....

    Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

    (0)

    • @harv
      Fucking yes. Dead - not... :)
      Nothing to say on the matter?
      Or are you too dim to check the facts for yourself???

      Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @HumanRightsAlert
      I also felt that the People of the United Kingdom, as the lacky of the United States in Iraq, Afghanistan, and more, would be happy to be informed that their courts are as corrupt as the courts of the United States... :)

      Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @harv
      Since you appear to be a bit slow, let me explain it to you at 8th grade level.
      What the Lord Justices of the Supreme Court are doing, is as part of a deal, they issue you a check that is:
      * Dated a month ahead.
      * Is not signed, and
      * Does not say what bank and what account it was drawn out of.

      Is that clear enough?

      Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

      (0)


Advertisement below
Liveleak on Facebook
LIKE Liveleak.com

Items

Advertisers