If this fact is believed to be true, then reason would dictate the same error on the current Obama BC, that is referring to Kenya as "Kenya" pre 1964 would also be incorrect and raise concerns. For the record I think the "Kenyan Obama BC" is a fraud, too convenient, and Media Matters does make a compelling case that Kenya was not referred to as Kenya prior to 1964, hence why the "Kenyan" BC is fraudulent.

WND believes the same despite the fact they also ran with the document. see link

Who knows, all i'm pointing out is that Media Matters won't take the time to point out this inaccuracy on the current document despite the fact they took the time to point it out when it suited their agenda in 2009. I don't know for a fact either way whether Kenya was referred to as such on BC's in Kenya or here prior to 1964, but if the Media Matters argument is to be accepted then they need to be called on the fact they are not raising concerns about the new Obama BC which also refers to Kenya pre 1964.

Hypocrisy on such a giant scale, right up there with a war in Libya, an oil rich country, started by an American President who rode to power on the very notion, that there can't be anything inherently noble about going to war if the country has oil and the President's last name is Bush.

I digress

____________________________________________________
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=106135WND story

http://mediamatters.org/blog/200908030001

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KenyaMedia Matters linknull