Safe Mode: On
Sikh Shooting Suspect's Sometimes Steady Slammered
 Part of channel(s): Shooting at Sikh temple in Wisconsin, USA (current event)

http://www.twincities.com/wisconsin/ci_21259476/wisconsin-ex-girlfriend-sikh-temple-shooter-arrested



: "Police in South Milwaukee say they've arrested the ex-girlfriend of a man who shot and killed six worshippers at a Sikh temple Sunday before police shot and killed him.Police Chief Ann Wellins released a statement Tuesday saying Misty M. Cook has been arrested on a tentative charge of being a felon in possession of a firearm."





more details about him/her here

http://www.jsonline.com/news/crime/gunmans-exgirlfriend-tied-to-whitepower-group-r66djcf-165342766.html


Nice to see the cops going hard on waitresses. Because of what an ex did. Makes sense. I'm sure they are telling her now "give us something good and we'll let ya go, you wanna see your kids again don't ya?". I'm sure this arrest will secure our nation from those armed, prideful Anglos. Really, as if her life probably wasn't hard enough, they're going to use an illegal law and really turn the screws on her and if she has no info to give in order to get charges dropped, they'll sleep fine after they send her off to prison.


Added: Aug-8-2012 Occurred On: Aug-8-2012
By: KutKorners
In:
Regional News
Tags: white, people, time, is, up, the, new, boss, not, same, as, old, boss
Location: United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 2426 | Comments: 21 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 3
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • @kutkorners

    The asshole's ex-girlfriend is a CONVICTED FELON. Convicted felons are NOT allowed to own firearms for a reason. Some people just can't grasp the concept.

    Posted Aug-8-2012 By 

    (6)

    • @Armed24-7 I did say illegal laws will be used against her. There is no allowance within the Constitution to deny felons their right to the Second Amendment.

      Posted Aug-8-2012 By 

      (-4)

    • @KutKorners There's no allowance in the constitution to deny convicts of their right to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness, but we throw them in jail all the time and rightly so you friking dingbat lunatic.

      Posted Aug-8-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @dorbie You should learn about the Eighth Amendment and then deliver a new argument.

      You stated " There's no allowance in the constitution to deny convicts of their right to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness, but we throw them in jail all the time and rightly so you friking dingbat lunatic."

      But you were wrong.

      AMENDMENT VIII
      Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.


      Plus a little extra thing- I think th More..

      Posted Aug-8-2012 By 

      (-2)

    • @KutKorners Nice try but irrelevant to my point. Convictions carry penalties.

      Posted Aug-8-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @dorbie By stating what is allowed, what is not allowed is clearly defined.

      When one states there is no allowance to deny convicts of their right to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and there actually is an Amendment to the Constitution which gives the government that right, then the one making the statement is wrong.

      Posted Aug-8-2012 By 

      (-3)

  • Comment of user 'heynow' has been deleted by author!
  • i agree. all felony charges should be dropped against her if she is the ex-girlfriend of a mass murderer and is also a waitress. i think it is in the constitution somewhere.

    Posted Aug-8-2012 By 

    (2)

    • @kiddkidd Yes it's a coincidence of timing. Cops went to talk to her about something other than what the guy did and just happened to conduct a search which did not result from his shooting up the Sikhs.

      Posted Aug-8-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @KutKorners yes, she is being persecuted! free all felons who have a gun and are ex-girlfriends of a mass murderer and also waitresses!

      Posted Aug-8-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @kiddkidd You may think the Constitution is unimportant, I do not.

      Posted Aug-8-2012 By 

      (-1)

    • @KutKorners unfortunately, it looks like you're hiding behind a really-old document instead of looking at real facts of the case.

      Now I agree with you on second amendment rights. I also would like to point out the fact that what you are hiding behind is an AMENDMENT, and not the original document itself.

      As for this case: She is a junkie felon and I'd rather not have to shoot her with MY gun. Don't let criminals carry guns - then we would be called Australia.

      Posted Aug-8-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @YourOpinionSucks "Don't let criminals carry guns - then we would be called Australia."


      ...Are you serious?

      Posted Aug-18-2012 By 

      (0)

  • It's simple, she had a gun and is a felon. There's no conspiracy here, no injustice and no mystery. If you're a convicted felon you better not be in possession of a firearm.

    Posted Aug-8-2012 By 

    (2)

  • dumbasses don't even know who they were shooting.

    Posted Aug-8-2012 By 

    (1)

  • Nothing shocking...that's how cops try to put pressure so that if she knows somethin..she might disclose, btw these felony charges are not made up.

    Posted Aug-8-2012 By 

    (1)

  • Dear White Nationalists,

    Please give the Norse their runes back. Please give the World its hooked cross back. Thank you.

    Posted Aug-8-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Fantastic alliteration on the title there!

    Posted Aug-8-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Comment of user 'Americanalltheway' has been deleted by author!
  • Comment of user 'dfdspom' has been deleted by moderator!