Safe Mode: On
Wow!… O’Donnell Nails Coons: “I Would Argue That More People Would Support My Catholic Faith Than His Marxist Beliefs”

Oops… Christine O’Donnell just let the commie out of the bag.
Christine O’Donnell nailed self-professed Marxist Chris Coons tonight saying,

“I would argue that more people would support my Catholic beliefs than his Marxist beliefs.”

No wonder the state-run media hates her. She keeps bringing up the facts that they do not want disclosed.
Coons then lied about his “Bearded Marxist” essay. He said it was satire when clearly it was not.
A feisty, aggressive Ms. O’Donnell called Mr. Coons a Marxist whose beliefs came from a socialist professor and said he would “rubber stamp” the policies of the Democrats in Washington. Mr. Coons raised questions about whether Ms. O’Donnell’s faith would drive her positions on social issues like abortion, prayer and evolution.

The state-run media was clearly in the tank for the Marxist in tonight’s show trial debate.

The liberals just love to take facts and distort them,put their nasty spin on them,lie about them so they can make fun of her, try to degrade her etc...BUT! when she counter attacks with the TRUTH,shock and awe.. the Marxist media hypocrites regret they opened that door. TRUTH is such a beautiful thing LMAO

Loading the player ...
Embed Code
Plays: 5122 (Embed: 0)

Added: Oct-14-2010 Occurred On: Oct-14-2010
By: star53
In:
News
Tags: Marxist, Chris Coons, Marxist Beliefs, Christine O’Donnell, Catholic Faith, hypocrites, Marxist media
Marked as: approved
Views: 6365 | Comments: 93 | Votes: 4 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Did he really say "right-wing media"???? LOL.

    Posted Oct-14-2010 By 

    (9)

  • The Dems absolutely cannot debate policy right now. The public is opposing them on almost every issue. MSNBC is tanking and sweaty Schultz is turning in to an angry characature of a journalist desperately trying to get attention. CNN is firing their loons becoming more centrist. Dem campaign ads don't even mention that they're Democrats because the polls tell them they should conceal that fact if they don't want to lose votes.

    Even if the media manages to submarine Odonnel like they did Palin, More..

    Posted Oct-14-2010 By 

    (7)

  • Cool, and I'd RATHER boil you in shit than vote for Coons.

    Posted Oct-14-2010 By 

    (5)

  • Coons IS a MARXIST. He is just another Lying POS Leftist that will say anything and everything to get elected.

    Wolf Blitzer is a freaking leftist TOOL!!!

    Posted Oct-14-2010 By 

    (5)

    • Define Marxist.

      Posted Oct-14-2010 By 

      (-6)

    • Well in the academic sense it is very different to politics/economics.

      I.e. marxist professors, normally believe that social/economic factors are the root cause of all change
      As opposed to individuals, circumstance, religion etc etc.

      Very different to the 'communist' type Marxist.

      Posted Oct-14-2010 By 

      (2)

    • Are you testing me? You think I am spouting?

      Marxist - is a follower of Marxism

      Marxism - The system of thought developed by Karl Marx, his co-worker Friedrich Engels, and their followers. See also SOCIALISM, COMMUNISM, DIALECTICAL, MATERIALISM

      Karl Marx - 1818-1883

      Do you need me to continue or are you a big boy and can find definitions in a book?

      Now I will leave you with a few quotes that I hope will jog your socialistic tendencies loose.

      "A major source of objection t More..

      Posted Oct-14-2010 By 

      (3)

    • Thanks my friend, you hit the proverbial nail on the head with that.

      I will be looking forward to the rebuttal that is offered up for your excellent post. (if it ever comes,that is)

      Posted Oct-14-2010 By 

      (-1)

    • Marxists:
      Groucho,
      Chico,
      Harpo
      and Zeppo.
      ;)

      Posted Oct-14-2010 By 

      (2)

  • I think she might be a little smarter than Palin....but she's still gonna lose big.

    Posted Oct-14-2010 By 

    (3)

  • Chris Coons: The making of a bearded marxist.

    Read it for yourself, make up your own mind.
    For the record, the link below is the first I found to the article in its original form.

    http://s3.mediamatters.org/static/images/item/20100920-coonsamherst.pdf

    Posted Oct-14-2010 By 

    (2)

  • Apparently she understands as much about Marxism as she does about evolution.

    For those of you who are slow, that means she doesn't understand s--t.

    Posted Oct-14-2010 By 

    (2)

  • Christine seems more legit than coons...period...

    Posted Oct-15-2010 By 

    (2)

  • youre getting crazy...

    Posted Oct-14-2010 By 

    (2)

  • Comment of user 'AxiomDeusVult' has been deleted by moderator!
  • Its amazing how many wanna bes politician and regular politicians love to stab each other in the back just so that they can have the job. Actually I wouldn't believe any one of them.

    Posted Oct-14-2010 By 

    (1)

  • Jesus, American interviewers are weak! Blitzer ask her again and again, Do you believe Evolution is a Myth!?

    Posted Oct-14-2010 By 

    (1)

  • She is feisty!

    Posted Oct-14-2010 By 

    (0)

  • is this before or after she said the earth was 6000 years old?

    Posted Oct-14-2010 By 

    (0)

    • And you think life exploded out of thin air for no reason? Retard!

      Posted Oct-14-2010 By 

      (-1)

    • typical uneducated tea party remark.

      deny science whenever it disagrees with your religion.

      shouldn't you be out searching for noah's ark?

      Posted Oct-14-2010 By 

      (2)

    • Science nor philosophy have answered the question of God or the origin of life and IMHO, and probably never will. Logic to me dictates an agnostic view on such things. Do you claim to know more? If so please enlighten. Don't bother to bring in religion, stick with what is empirical. Being your tone was so snooty about uneducated tea party folks, I figured you liked to bring us up to speed on such matters.

      Posted Oct-14-2010 By 

      (1)

    • ok, science has dispriven the earth is 6000 yearsold, that they are no such thing as a talking snake, that there was nota global flood 4000 years ago, that it is impossible for a man to walk on water, that it is impossible for evil spirits to be cast out of a man and into a herd of pigs, etc.

      i can go on and on.

      science has proven religion to be mythology.

      Posted Oct-14-2010 By 

      (2)

    • Noah's Ark:
      http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=Ararat, Turkey&sll=-37.284301,142.928227&sspn=0.38188,0.289764&ie=UTF8&t=k&om=1&hq=&hnear=Mt Ararat, 76000 I%C4%9Fd%C4%B1r, Turkey&ll=39.44138,44.234004&spn=0.004408,0.013937&z=17

      More info:
      http://www.squidoo.com/noahsarkfound#

      Posted Oct-14-2010 By 

      (0)

  • She never did answer the question did she?
    Because she DOES think evolution is a myth.
    She thinks science is a bunch of hocus pocus liberal magic.

    Posted Oct-14-2010 By 

    (0)