Safe Mode: On
This is the high educated stuff a Pioneer of global peace studies has to share:

In several racist,bizzare remarks, Norwegian sociologist Johan Galtung,
nicknamed the “father of peace studies,” defends 'The Protocols of the Elders of Zion' and says Jewish influence was one of the factors leading to Auschwitz.

He also hints at link between Norway massacre and Mossad...

Among other claims, Galtung stated that there is a possible link between Anders Behring Breivik, responsible for massacring dozens of children in Norway last summer, and Jewish and Israeli factions. The connection is supposedly based on the fact that the murderer has ties to the “Freemasons” organization, “which has Jewish origins,” according to Galtung. The supposed connection to Israel is through the Mossad – which Galtung believes might have given Breivik his orders.

In the same breath, Galtung mentioned a conspiracy theory, linking last summer’s massacre in Norway with the attack on the King David Hotel, carried out by the Etzel in 1946 – both attacks took place on July 22. He finished with this astonishing claim: “It will be interesting to read the [Norwegian] police report on Israel, during the trial."

In an email exchange with Haaretz on Sunday, Galtung requested to clear up his claims. “When we know nothing about who is behind Breivik, including whether there is anybody at all, any hypothesis is legitimate; that is in the nature of research,” wrote Galtung.

“I consider the Mossad highly unlikely, but it is illegitimate to eliminate it as a hypothesis with no evidence,” continued Galtung.



By Haaretz, 30.04.12

Johan Galtung, Norwegian sociologist nicknamed the “father of peace studies,” made anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli remarks while lecturing at the University of Oslo, in an article published afterward in the Norwegian press and in an interview with Haaretz that followed.

Among other statements, Galtung claimed that a possible connection exists between the terrorist responsible for the massacre of children in Norway last summer, and the Mossad. “The Jews control U.S. media, and divert for the sake of Israel,” wrote Galtung in an article published in Norway.

He pointed out that one of the factors behind the anti-Semitic sentiment that led to Auschwitz was the fact that Jews held influential positions in German society.
Galtung also recommended reading “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” – one of the most popular anti-Semitic texts in the world.

Professor Galtung, 82-years-old, is one of the founders of the discipline called “Peace Studies and Conflict Resolution,” as well as a founder of the international Peace Research Institute in Oslo. He is considered well-respected sociological researcher, has been awarded many prizes, and is the author of over a thousand articles and over a hundred books. Some of his work has also been translated into Hebrew.

Galtung’s repeated anti-Semitic remarks were exposed by the website of the Norwegian periodical, “Humanist.” (http://humanist.no) Some of the comments were made during a lecture at the University of Oslo last summer, and others were written by Galtung in response to an article critical of him that was published in the periodical.

Among other claims, Galtung stated that there is a possible link between Anders Behring Breivik, responsible for massacring dozens of children in Norway last summer, and Jewish and Israeli factions. The connection is supposedly based on the fact that the murderer has ties to the “Freemasons” organization, “which has Jewish origins,” according to Galtung. The supposed connection to Israel is through the Mossad – which Galtung believes might have given Breivik his orders.

In the same breath, Galtung mentioned a conspiracy theory, linking last summer’s massacre in Norway with the attack on the King David Hotel, carried out by the Etzel in 1946 – both attacks took place on July 22. He finished with this astonishing claim: “It will be interesting to read the [Norwegian] police report on Israel, during the trial."

In an email exchange with Haaretz on Sunday, Galtung requested to clear up his claims. “When we know nothing about who is behind Breivik, including whether there is anybody at all, any hypothesis is legitimate; that is in the nature of research,” wrote Galtung.

“I consider the Mossad highly unlikely, but it is illegitimate to eliminate it as a hypothesis with no evidence,” continued Galtung.

When asked what he meant concerning the police report on Israel, Galtung replied: “Exactly what I said. I’m assuming that they are open to any possibility, and not only investigating acts carried out by Breivik, but rather other conjectures as well.”
In the correspondence with Haaretz, Galtung mentioned what he calls the “ambiguity of everything human.” To explain, he raised examples from the Middle Ages and the modern period. According to Galtung, “The terrible programs,” carried out upon the Jews, had another “problematic” side as well. “The Jews played a role in demanding payment from indebted peasants,” wrote Galtung.

According to Galtung, “terrible Auschwitz,” had two sides as well. “[It was] not unproblematic that Jews had key niches in a society humiliated by defeat at Versailles,” wrote Galtung, referencing Germany following World War I. Galtung continued, “In no way, absolutely no way, does this justify the atrocities. But it created anti-Semitism that could have been predicted.”

Another claim, made by Galtung in a Norwegian periodical, is that Jews control the American media. “Six Jewish companies control 96% of the media,” wrote Galtung. He included the names of journalists, publishers, TV networks, and movie studios, that he claims are controlled by Jews. Media mogul Rupert Murdoch was also included on the list. “He’s not Jewish, but many of the people under him are,” wrote Galtung, in reference to Murdoch. “Many of them are fanatically pro-Israel,” he pointed out. Immediately following these claims, Galtung wrote that “seventy percent of the professors at the 20 most important American universities are Jewish.”

Galtung bases his doctrine on an article written by William Luther Pierce, founder of the “National Alliance,” a white supremacist organization. The same article inspired Timothy McVeigh to carry out the Oklahoma City bombings that killed 168 people in 1995.




When asked by Haaretz to describe the effects of the “Jewish control” of the media, he answered that it could be a good thing, in terms of intellectual quality, but that it could also “limit the discourse about anything where Israel is involved."

As an example, he raised American media coverage of Iran. According to Galtung, “U.S. mainstream media only discusses Iran in terms of nuclear arms,” and does not discuss American involvement in internal Iranian affairs. Galtung wrote of “The trauma of 1953 – the CIA-MI6 strike against a legally elected prime minister.” Another example, according to Galtung, is “The Arab Spring, discussed only in terms of dictatorship-democracy, not also in terms of the role of U.S.-Israel behind those dictatorships."

Galtung also held an open forum discussion concerning the contents of the book “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” one of the most quoted anti-Semitic works around the world. “I wonder how many people with such strong opinions on the book have even read it,” he wrote. “It is impossible to do so today without thinking of Goldman Sachs,” he added. Goldman Sachs is an international investment Bank founded and run by Jews, attacked in the media from time to time as a “capitalist pig."

“The Protocols,” are a forgery, created by the Russian secret police during the days of the Czar, which supposedly illustrates the Jewish plot created at a secret conference called the “Elders of Zion” to take over the world. Galtung, however, has another opinion. “It is hard to believe that the Russian secret police was able to be so specific,” wrote Galtung. While corresponding with Haaretz, he was less decisive, writing “I don’t know exactly who wrote the protocols."

Gad Yair, a sociology professor at Hebrew University, was the first to expose Galtung’s anti-Semitic remarks in Israel. Yair wrote about Galtung in his blog. (http://coolcite.com).

“Professor Galtung was a valued and deserving member of any public or academic discussion, until now. If a trustworthy peace-broker was ever needed anywhere in the world, that was Norwegian professor Johan Galtung. This background gives meaning to the astonishment of Norwegian academia in the face of his comments. It is the same as the astonishment created by the murderer Breivikin." Norwegian academia is wondering, added Yair, how "this merchant of peace was basing his ideas on neo-Nazi publications, and including them in interviews, lectures and articles? Does he also, like Breivik, cry peace with a Nazi salute?"







http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/pioneer-of-global-peace-studies-hints-at-link-between-norway-massacre-and-mossad-1.427385


Added: May-1-2012 Occurred On: May-1-2012
By: aydeo
In:
Other News, Other Middle East
Tags: Norwegian sociologist, Johan Galtung, father of peace studies, Protocols of the Elders of Zion, Auschwitz, Norway massacre
Marked as: approved
Views: 3014 | Comments: 50 | Votes: 1 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 1 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • so the norway attack was because of the jooooos too. this is like 1939 all over again. what utter nonsense

    Posted May-1-2012 By 

    (6)

  • Antisemitic scumbag.

    Posted May-1-2012 By 

    (3)

  • leftist slug

    Posted May-1-2012 By 

    (2)

  • The guy has crazy theories, but what he said was "when there is no evidence, you have to keep all your options open" And that is intelligent, he is right, but their is no support to his claims... I like how the article is what labels him as anti-semetic, he is just a conspiracy theorist for nnow

    Posted May-1-2012 By 

    (1)

    • @chrisTHEfish its not intelligent to even mention a catholic monk's anti-semitic rant, written on behalf of the catholic church 200 years ago which was plagiarized by some russian idiots who wanted to pin Russian failures on a scape-goat. That's just plain assinine. You looked to deep into a fixed template; the man is just a jack-ass and is viewed as such by many Norwegians, including the rag that outed him.

      Posted May-1-2012 By 

      (0)

  • Wow; I just read the comments here and you see the tiny handful of insignificant haters debating such an assinine heap of words from a freakazoid...anything that will feed the trolls and haters. Pathetic.

    Posted May-1-2012 By 

    (1)

  • Seems that several around here had just found themselves a new hero... LOL

    If this is what the Scandinavian/Eroupean 'Liberal-Left' has to offer then their situation is really really bad, and I say it as a liberal from the left.

    Posted May-1-2012 By 

    (0)

    • @aydeo Crazy Eroupeans.

      commenting on your own videos again.. kind of sad. Why don't you just edit the article to suit your viewpoint next time?

      Posted May-1-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @kingofthebox

      This is not a video, it's an article, and I'm not commenting on my own vidoe (I didn't 'made' it), I'm expressing my own personal opinion regarding his remarks.
      Quite many around here does it in their posts, no one is bothered with that.

      I didn't say 'crazy Eroupeans',unlike some others here I don't tend to make generalizations about others, I was just reffering to the specific bunch who likes to spread their hate against certain places or people,usually using all kind of bizzar More..

      Posted May-1-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @aydeo How do you know this guy is a liberal?

      Posted May-1-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @kingofthebox
      because he stinks

      Posted May-1-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @kingofthebox

      He is not, thats the whole dam point I was making, he just pretend to be some sort of European Liberal and intelectual.

      And in person I hold great amount of respect to REALL Intelectualism and Liberalism.

      Posted May-1-2012 By 

      (0)

  • What is it of what he said was not true?

    Genuinely tell me, I can't be arsed reading the whole thing.

    p.s He doesn't "defend" the protocols of Zion... He says its impossible not to think of goldman sachs when you read them.

    But hey I'm sure i'll crucified by -1s for saying that

    Posted May-1-2012 By 

    (0)

    • Comment of user 'MB-UK' has been deleted by author!
    • @kingofthebox I read the whole thing. He really didn't take solid positions but just raised questions and suggested one or two hypotheses. That's enough to condemn him in some circles.

      It's also hard to think of Goldman Sachs without wondering where you can buy one of those clubs that are used on baby seals. +1

      Posted May-1-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @TMoray1 Luckily the Norweigans are a bit more calm and collected, I'm sure they'll judge him on the merits of his argument

      Posted May-1-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @kingofthebox I wish, the nature of pc here is as two-faced as anywhere. Half the time sering gov't ministers are saying boycott Israel and the other half anything criticising Israel is anti-semitic.

      Prof Galtung hasn't even done that. You'd have to be really thin-skinned and seeing Nazis behind every second bush to defer an anti-semitic sentiment from his articles. But that is the nature of the jewish argument.

      Posted May-1-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @Ladage1845
      FINALLY, well said

      Posted May-1-2012 By 

      (-2)

  • At the time this comment is being written there have been 0 views and 1 comment (not this one yet)according to the log above.

    Posted May-1-2012 By 

    (0)

  • It's not the Jews. I recommend listening to the broadcasts of William Cooper.

    Posted May-1-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Any reference to Jews in the Protocols of The Elders of Zion should be replaced with Illuminati.

    Posted May-1-2012 By 

    (0)

  • The 'Protocols" were ripped off by the Russian's from a French catholic monk who penned the original versiona for the 'church'. The French public dismissed it as a pathetic anti-semitic rant and it went nowhere. It was dug up by the russian thugs who re-wrote it virtually word for word in a pathetic attempt to pin Russia's failures on a scape-goat. Pathetic european moron's, lock-stock-n-barrel: always hating someone, always pushing countries into staunch nationalism or wars; control and More..

    Posted May-1-2012 By 

    (0)

    • @Gene Lythgow

      Thanks for the first part, very interesting to know.

      As for your second part (regarding the Eruopeans), well, this is your opinion and you are entitle to hold it but I wont share it myself.. :)

      Posted May-1-2012 By 

      (1)

    • Comment of user 'Gene Lythgow' has been deleted by author!
  • Stay classy Norway.

    Posted May-2-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Galtung is a scientist, not a politician. Being 'politically correct' when researching sociological matters is counter productive. Obviously, a world renowned 'conflict resolution and peace -researcher' is not racist. Look him up and you will soon realize this. He is a very intelligible and brave man who believes that peace requires respect for the arguments on both sides of the conflict. He also points out that any claims being made needs to be researched in order to be scientifically rebutted More..

    Posted May-21-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Comment of user 'MB-UK' has been deleted by author!
    • @MB-UK

      You are entitle to call them 'silly', but at list my comments are not spreading ugly hate against others, like yours.

      Posted May-1-2012 By 

      (3)

    • Comment of user 'MB-UK' has been deleted by author!
    • @MB-UK

      Lol- You mean this?
      " If this is what the Scandinavian/Eroupean 'Liberal-Left' has to offer then their situation is really really bad"

      Where do you see here a general remark regarding Eroupeans....?

      It is a remark regarding a specific political/intelectual group which spread hate and conspiracy theories in name of 'liberalism'.


      Can you compare this with those examples:

      " Considering both idiots are semites they most likely already have blood ties "

      "M More..

      Posted May-1-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @aydeo
      No, just trivializing the murder of Palestinians at the hands of Israelis by calling it a 'mistake' or 'accident' or 'mishap'

      No, hate is much better than mocking the dead

      Posted May-1-2012 By 

      (-2)

    • @FUCK_S0PA
      palestinians are shit

      Posted May-1-2012 By 

      (0)