Safe Mode: On
The Media Lies About Bush, Iraq and the WMD's Exposed

This is a clip of Jeff Kuhner from talk570.com and The Washington Times talking about how the Russians helped move the WMD's to Syria for Saddam. Jeff is only one of the very few that are brave enough to say this on any public forum.

http://theconservativemonster.com

Loading the player ...
Embed Code
Plays: 5753 (Embed: 0)

Added: Mar-9-2010 Occurred On: Mar-9-2010
By: DeleteFrance
In:
News
Tags: Media Bias, News, Editorial, Iraq, Russia, 9-11, Communism, Censorship, NWO, Jeff Kuhner, the conservative monster, steve cooper, democrats, kgb, wmds, saddam
Marked as: approved
Views: 7125 | Comments: 63 | Votes: 2 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • It really doesn't matter what Bush's reasons were for going into Iraq. He never should have been given the authority to make that decision in the first place. According to the Constituion of the United States the only body that is legally allowed to make decisions regarding peace and war is the COngress, not the executive branch.

    Posted Mar-9-2010 By 

    (7)

  • everyone's a genius in hindsight

    Posted Mar-9-2010 By 

    (4)

  • The biggest weapon of mass destruction in Iraq is "Islam".

    Posted Mar-9-2010 By 

    (2)

  • It's true that saying it was all about WMD is a lie. It's pure revisionism. Tony Blair gave a similar speech in the house of commons. He said SPECIFICALLY that even if there were no WMDs that we should still take out Saddam. This was BEFORE the war. Also discussed was Saddam's support for terrorists (specifically Plaestinian terrorist's and their families) his continued defiance of U.N. resolutions and his latent potential to resume his weapons program at any time if he did not have them now, an More..

    Posted Mar-9-2010 By 

    (2)

    • BTW Who is Jeffrey Archer? I never heard of him.

      Its pompous for you to assume you know where I get my information from.

      Posted Mar-10-2010 By 

      (0)

    • Thatcher era U.K. politician, pulp novelist and convicted perjurer. I thought he did a Clancy style novel about the Iraqi supergun, but I may have confabulated his "Honor among Thieves" with something else.

      Posted Mar-11-2010 By 

      (0)

  • What a bunch of pathetic bullsh*t. If there had been the slightest trace of WMD found, or if they had any proof at all that it had been moved out of the country, they would have been shouting it from every rooftop ever since.

    Posted Mar-9-2010 By 

    (2)

    • Bro, they did!

      Ask Scott Ritter, oh - you can't because he is too busy trading CHILD PORN on the internet!!! What a great guy to lead the inspections!!

      But our left wing media hated Bush so much that they lied to make him look bad!

      A Syrian military officer said he helped fly some WMD's into Syria, but nobody is listening.

      Posted Mar-9-2010 By 

      (0)

  • Who cares now! I don't! Saddam is dead, his sons are dead and 65% of the people voted yesterday! Our soliders did a great job!! They soon will be coming home to victory!!

    Obama came in the most adored and he will leave more hated then George W. Bush!

    History will show that America did the right thing.

    Now that being said, Iraq start paying back America for getting you out from under the devil!! Start paying us back!!!! Iraq divided a country, now its time for them to step up and show the wor More..

    Posted Mar-9-2010 By 

    (2)

    • and if the dont pay us back on "our" decision to go in we'll go in to get payed back!!! YYYYYAAAAAHHHoooooooo bring it on, and we'll show you what happens to your 1 dollar goat with a Half million dollar cruise missle, pin pointed by a half million dollar predator... better think twice because the "tab" will triple (jus kidden)

      Posted Mar-9-2010 By 

      (0)

  • That would explain the 50 truck convoy that left Iraq 2 days before the war and was seen heading into syria.

    Posted Mar-9-2010 By 

    (1)

    • Most of these items were moved by rail. No different than Iraq flying their Jets to Iran and surrendering them to the Iranians.

      Posted Mar-9-2010 By 

      (0)

    • Convoys to and from Syria were not uncommon. It doesn't mean anything.

      Let's remember the role of politically motivated convicted kiddie sex pervert Scott Ritter in covering all this up. This prick went into high gear trying to discredit Bush in support of a Democrat smear operation. Both he and Joe Wilson who did the same have a lot to answer for.

      Posted Mar-9-2010 By 

      (0)

    • I agree.

      Posted Mar-9-2010 By 

      (0)

  • "There were a lot of people, both Republicans and Democrats, who felt there were weapons of mass destruction. Many of the leaders in the Congress spoke strongly about the fact that Saddam Hussein had weapons prior to my arrival in Washington, DC. And we're all looking at the same intelligence. So I strongly reject that this administration hasn't been straight with the American people. The minute we found out they didn't have weapons of mass destruction, I was the first to say so."

    G More..

    Posted Mar-9-2010 By 

    (1)

  • lol pure historical revisionism.

    if it were true the neocons of the time woulda jumped at the chance to invade syria aswell. amirite?

    read the duelfer report and stop clinging to the revisionist rantings of talk show hacks

    Posted Mar-9-2010 By 

    (1)

  • Just want the real story to come out. Of course liberals will just say hogwash! They don't want the real story.

    When every major super power in the world said they had them and every Dem of importance said they had them, something was going on over there.

    Posted Mar-9-2010 By 

    (0)

  • Interesting. Although it makes no sense that the media would first push the WMD angle, only to cover it up later. It would be a good story, everybody would read it. Money in the bank.
    But let's assuem it is true. Iraq has WMDs, then what? Is it the business of the Us? No. And no it's not "the world's busniess", it's Iraq's business whether they have the bomb or not. Everybody else that is somebody in the world has it. It's an arms race, deal with it! So if they got them from the russ More..

    Posted Mar-9-2010 By 

    (0)

    • if weapons are made, intended to destroy me then hell yeah, ya bet its my business

      Posted Mar-9-2010 By 

      (4)

    • (Is it the business of the Us? No. And no it's not "the world's business", it's Iraq's business whether they have the bomb or not.) This is such a stupid statement!!

      If that's the case, lets give Somalia a nuke!!!

      (Does it really help to go in and kill everybody?)

      Really, everybody? Another pathetic statement! More exaggerations!

      (Iraq was going over to the Euro, then you invaded and made the oil companies deal in Dollars. No big deal? Oh, yes it is.)

      Dude, you are the most ignor More..

      Posted Mar-9-2010 By 

      (0)

  • who gives a shit

    Posted Mar-9-2010 By 

    (0)

  • lmao

    Posted Mar-9-2010 By 

    (0)

  • WAAAAAAaaaaaaahhhhhhh, If, If the right wing media would of been doing there job and reporting dull boring news instead of promoting "opinions" then maybe what they claim wasnt covered could be covered.
    I have heard of the russians working with sadamm to move these weapons out, I also knew the sale of wmds, biological (its in the congressional records), I also knew of saddam threatening to drop the dollar as iraqs reserve currency in favor of the euro!, after the war there is reports More..

    Posted Mar-9-2010 By 

    (0)

  • you fucken idiot

    Posted May-17-2010 By 

    (0)