Safe Mode: On
Ron Paul is the most dangerous man in the Republican party

In the wake of his second-place showing in the New Hampshire primary on Tuesday night, Texas Rep. Ron Paul
declared: “We are dangerous to the status quo of this country”.He’s right. And that could be a very bad thing for a Republican party hoping to take back the White House this Novem.

A look at exit polling from New Hampshire suggests that Paul
has a significant — and steady — following that exists almost entirely
apart from the Republican party and is, in many ways, based on a disgust
with the GOP.Two numbers from the exit polls jump out.

1)
Almost seven in ten people who voted for Paul on Tuesday in New
Hampshire said they would be “dissatisfied” if former Massachusetts
governor Mitt Romney was the Republican nominee. 2) Fully
78 percent of Paul’s New Hampshire support came from those who are
dissatisfied or angry with the Obama administration — not surprising
given the low regard in which the current president is held by
Republicans. But, consider this: 77 percent of Paul’s Granite State
supporters in 2008 were similarly upset with the Bush administration. In
fact, half of all Paul’s votes four years ago came from voters
downright “angry” with Republican president. Combine those two
data points with the fact that Paul’s vote total more than tripled
between 2008 (18,308 votes) and 2012 (56,000 votes and counting) and
it’s clear that the Texas Republican’s support is not only primed and
ready to follow him wherever he leads but it is also growing.That
double-barreled dose of reality leads naturally to a discussion of a
possible third party bid in 2012 by Paul. He’s been asked any number of
times about it and always demurs, insisting that it’s nothing he’s
planning on doing. (In an interview with Fox News Channel’s Greta van Susteren Monday, Paul said: “That thought doesn’t cross my mind. I’m not thinking in those terms.”)We believe him. But, circumstances change.

Imagine
this scenario: Between now and Super Tuesday — March 6 — Romney wins
enough primaries that he becomes the de facto nominee. Former House
Speaker Newt Gingrich, former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum
and the rest of the field bows to the inevitable and gets out. Paul, on
the other hand, stays in the race — continuing to accrue delegates and
strengthen his negotiating position for a larger voice in the party (if
that’s what he wants).The Republican party will then be faced
with a choice. Do they bow to Paul’s demands — a speaking slot at the
convention or perhaps more? — or do they simply ignore him in hopes he
goes away.If the party takes the latter course, Paul may well
adjust his thinking on a third party bid. (Remember, he has already done
it once: he ran as the Libertarian Party’s presidential nominee in
1988.)And, some of his rhetoric on Tuesday night certainly
suggested that Paul viewed his candidacy as the leading edge of a much
larger movement. “I think the intellectual revolution that’s going on
now to restore liberty in this country is well on its way, and there’s
no way they’re going to stop the momentum that we have started,” he
said.Should Paul decide that his cause is best championed via a
third party bid for president, the impact would be disastrous for
Republicans next fall.How disastrous? Take a look at the Washington Post/ABC News poll conducted in mid-December.
In it, President Obama and Romney are tied at 47 percent in a
traditional two-way race. Add Paul in as a third party candidate and
Obama takes 42 percent, Romney 32 percent and Paul 21 percent. That’s a
pretty stark difference in potential outcomes.There is one
x-factor that may lead Paul to accept a negotiated detente with the GOP
rather than go to all-out war as a third party candidate. And that x
factor’s name is Rand Paul, the Kentucky Republican senator and son of Ron Paul.It’s
no secret that Rand, who was elected to the Senate in 2010, has
national ambitions. (There was even some talk he might run instead of
his dad in this election.) A Ron Paul third party bid in 2012
would almost certainly tank Rand’s chances of being taken seriously as a
candidate for the Republican nomination in 2016 or 2020 (or maybe
ever). The Paul forces know that and it may ultimately be a major reason
why Ron Paul decides that a deal with the establishment is the more
prudent course of action.Make no mistake: What Ron Paul decides
to do over the next few months will be watched with a mixture of
fascination and trepidation by the political world. And that makes him
the most dangerous man in (and to) the Republican party.


Added: Jan-21-2012 Occurred On: Jan-21-2012
By: Doyle1
In:
Other
Tags: Ron, Paul
Views: 4098 | Comments: 1 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.