Safe Mode: On
9/11 Flight 93 Shanksville, No Plane! No Crash!



The crater at the Alleged Crash Site proved to be there before 9/11!

The evidence shows that Flight 93 did indeed crash near Shanksville, and suggests that the passengers did struggle to gain control of the plane. However, the cause of the crash was apparently trauma to the aircraft -- such as a missile strike -- rather than the actions of whoever was in the cockpit. Evidence of such trauma preceding the jetliner's nose-dive includes the widely scattered debris field, numerous ear- and eyewitness accounts, and evidence that NORAD and the 9/11 Commission changed the time-line to hide the plane's true fate.
http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/analysis/flight93/index.html

Die Beweise zeigen, dass Flug 93 in der Tat haben Absturz bei Shanksville, und schlägt vor, dass die Passagiere Kampf um die Kontrolle über das Flugzeug zu gewinnen war. Allerdings war die Ursache des Absturzes offenbar Trauma, das Flugzeug - wie ein Raketenangriff - anstatt die Handlungen wer war im Cockpit. Beweise für ein solches Trauma vor dem Jetliner's Sturzflug umfasst die weit verstreuten Trümmerfeld, zahlreiche Ohr-und Augenzeugen und Beweise dafür, dass NORAD und die 9 / 11 Kommission der Zeit-Linie auf der Ebene wahr Schicksal verstecken geändert.
_________________________________________
The Light of the World,Movie(Full Length)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWO_peGaGvg


Added: Sep-11-2011 
By: amy2x
In:
WTF
Tags: conspiracy, building what, BuildingWhat, wtc, amy2x, demolition, explosives, thermite, nanothermite, larry silverstein, 9/11 truth, conspiracy theoriesfree fall, freefall, nyc, can, richard gage, david chandler, steven jones, niels harrit, Solomon brothers, jowenko
Marked as: approved
Views: 3897 | Comments: 47 | Votes: 6 | Favorites: 2 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • WARNING! Stupidity level in this video is hazardous to anyone with an IQ over 20. To help understand it. Persons watching it need to gulp down one full bottle of EverClear. Drink a six pack of Keystone light and then slam your head in to a brick wall from a running start at least 6 times.
    It is only after taking the preparation above will you understand what the special needs people who made this video are trying to say.
    You have been warned.

    Posted Sep-11-2011 By 

    (6)

  • Again WOW, I had never seen that particular angle of the crash site in PA, but now that you have brought it to my attention, I have to say, it looks EXACTLY like a plane went straight into the ground. It likely exceeded it's G, or speed threshold at some point which could have ripped debris from the plane prior to the crash, resulting in a minor debris field.

    Also this is not the first plane to ever disappear into the ground so completely, but I am certain you don't care about that.

    Posted Sep-11-2011 By 

    (5)

    • @starskyandhutch69 the flight voice recorders that are in the tail section were recovered 50ft in the ground. It hit at over 500mph

      Posted Sep-11-2011 By 

      (1)

  • Now, in my own opinion,yes, this is one I havent signed off on as of yet.
    As soon as you hear about "discrepincies" in times and stories, you have to atleast ask questions.

    Posted Sep-11-2011 By 

    (3)

  • The titanium engines are virtually indestructible! Where are the luggage , bodies, wings, tail section?

    Posted Sep-11-2011 By 

    (3)

    • Comment of user 'bullcanada' has been deleted by author!
    • @nomadlife
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZjhxuhTmGk

      Where are the wings, engines or tail section of that aircraft? And that was only at 500 mph!!!!!!

      Posted Sep-11-2011 By 

      (1)

    • @bullcanada

      You are still asleep.

      Posted Sep-11-2011 By 

      (1)

    • @Simnut

      Really? That is a smaller plane than a 757, the video doesn't show the aftermath, and concreate does not give like earth. So I ask again. Really?

      Posted Sep-11-2011 By 

      (0)

  • Good find. I found this pre 9/11 scare on the net just after 9/11. Then it went missing. I'm glad someone saved it.

    Some of this video was taken about 20 minutes after impact. The only conclusion as to why there are no fuel fires is that it burned up before impact which puts a hole through the official version of events.

    Posted Sep-11-2011 By 

    (2)

  • It's possible that U93 was shot down but there would have been remains in any case.

    Without remains you can't say what was the cause of the crash. What's sure is that radar operators know all the story and there lies the truth.

    Posted Sep-11-2011 By 

    (2)

  • So many vaporising jet turbine cores and vanishing or never released black boxes.

    Posted Sep-11-2011 By 

    (2)

  • Comment of user 'k-doe' has been deleted by author!
  • The one who took down WTC7 is responsible for 9/11 not the muslems.
    You idiots, it is an INSIDE JOB.

    Posted Sep-11-2011 By 

    (1)

  • Dont bother posting folks. Dont feed the "parasites.

    Posted Sep-11-2011 By 

    (1)

  • So where is that plane and all those people ??.....They did find parts of that plane there....there was a crash in florida years ago that was just like this, the angle of crash was steep enough to go straight into the ground...but I ain't no scientist, but I am smart enough to figure that out !!!

    Posted Sep-11-2011 By 

    (0)

    • @442kid

      Are you talking about Valuejet 592? That plane nosedived into a deep water swamp. that is far different than a field in Shanksville, PA.

      I'm not stupid nor a scientist, I'm just saying.

      Posted Sep-11-2011 By 

      (-2)

    • @Jukamatuka

      Hey there truther, why did you leave out the important information? Here is the entire explanation;

      "the location of the crash itself (Valujet flight 592) was a deep-water swamp with a bedrock base. The DC-9 shattered on impact with the bedrock, leaving very few large portions of the plane intact"

      Also, if you forgot your high school physics, hitting even water at a high speed is akin to hitting concrete. That's why people who jump from bridges get all broken up.

      Thank More..

      Posted Sep-11-2011 By 

      (2)

    • @442kid Evidence please

      Posted Sep-11-2011 By 

      (0)

    • @starskyandhutch69

      Uh the comment I replied to said a florida plane went straight into the ground. Value jet went into a deep water swamp. Do you not see the difference? And you say I spread misinformation.
      This is a ground impact, Value jet sunk into water. That was my point.

      It's hard to believe what you don't want to believe even if the mayor says it.

      Posted Sep-11-2011 By 

      (2)

    • @Jukamatuka

      Oh well if the mayor said it, it must be true.

      My point is that it doesn't matter if it was ground or water or concrete, the result was the same.

      Posted Sep-11-2011 By 

      (-2)

  • That part seems plausible, but there had to be some recovered bodies and luggage for the funerals and families. How could a scattered wreckage not be noticed by a lot of people? I mean we're not talking out in the Sahara desert or something. I mean this was a fairly well populated area with a lot of potential witnesses.

    Posted Sep-11-2011 By 

    (0)

    • @mendew

      The coroner walked away from this crash and spoke on camera. He said I could not find one spot of blood to analyse. How could that be?

      Posted Sep-11-2011 By 

      (2)

    • @24038462 My point exactly. Were there any DNA verified bodies recovered for the funerals? And if the plane broke up due to a missile strike, wouldn't local folks have found or seen the scattered parts? This story should address those questions

      Posted Sep-11-2011 By 

      (2)

  • FYI- Planes are relatively fragile when flown beyond their scientifically-derived load limitations.

    They WILL suffer catastrophic structural failure when flown well beyond those limits.

    There's a reason for the little red mark on the airspeed indicator.
    It indicates Vne, The 'never exceed' speed. Once a pilot flies beyond that speed, he becomes a test pilot.

    It's so dangerous to exceed those limits that most commercial aircraft will emit a verbal over-speed warning and activate the stick-sha More..

    Posted Sep-11-2011 By 

    (0)

  • First we let idiots vote, then we give them the internet to brandish their idiocy publicly. Someone ... stop the insanity!! Save us, Al Gore!!

    Posted Sep-11-2011 By 

    (0)

  • Another bullshit post... hey I have a challenge for you truthers show me wreckage from an airliner traveling 600mph in a straight dive... Oh and as usual you truthers always leave out photos and info showing debris... airplane debris from this site. You people are sick and deplorable at this point. You heard your king Alex Jones say this was all inside job and fake and took it as gospel. Thats ok the weak minded need an idol too... just show me video of other planes wreckage in a similar situat More..

    Posted Sep-11-2011 By 

    (0)