Safe Mode: On
satellite views of the 3 reservoirs on Crowfoot Rd.





Google Maps shows 3 large reservoirs on the Crowfoot Rd. property in question.



So the rain barrel images associated with this article are highly deceptive. This guy has a huge catchment of water. At least let's be honest about what is being debated here.


Added: Jul-30-2012 Occurred On: Jul-30-2012
By: dorbie
In:
Other
Tags: rain water, catchment, reservoir, water rights, Crowfoot Rd, Eagle Point, Oregon
Location: Eagle Point, Oregon, United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 1779 | Comments: 51 | Votes: 2 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • if hes in trouble how come they can sell bottled water where does that come from not collecting rainwater on their own property but drilling under their land and extracting and depleting our groundwater supplies and lakes

    Posted Jul-30-2012 By 

    (4)

    • @Slim Daddee theres a guy in texas that does just that , hes a billionair

      Posted Jul-30-2012 By 

      (1)

    • Comment of user 'bostonbakedbean' has been deleted by author!
    • @Slim Daddee

      It's called having or leasing water rights. Those that sell bottled water have that.

      Posted Jul-30-2012 By 

      (2)

    • t. rowe price I beLIEve

      Posted Jul-31-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @-stile- that's not right who has the authority to lease rights of the water that belongs to everyone so they can profit off of it I know I'm gonna just keep my faucet running into a giant pit I dug out back so I dont run outta water when they lease it all away to some billionaire

      Posted Jul-31-2012 By 

      (0)

  • I found three other articles on it that had photographs attached to them. One had a hand with water dripping onto it, such as what you'd expect to see from a house rain gutter. Another had three or four barrels collecting run-off from what also appeared to be rain gutters and the other was what was posted with the story here on LL earlier. It's really enlightening to actually look into the stories that the news puts out there. Where we'd hope to get all the facts, we get just what the editor or More..

    Posted Jul-30-2012 By 

    (3)

    • @weada " "Where we'd hope to get all the facts, we get just what the editor or reporters want to show depending upon their stance on the subject."
      How great is the internet eh?

      Posted Jul-30-2012 By 

      (4)

    • @marc1921 Not just the internet. I read my local paper somewhat regularly and the same thing is done. Lets not even get started on the TV networks. lol

      Posted Jul-30-2012 By 

      (4)

    • @weada They no longer control the debate! Too many outlets. I also think that people are starting to wake up to the fact that the news they offer isn't really the news.

      Posted Jul-30-2012 By 

      (5)

    • @marc1921
      Yep and they want to keep that power!

      Posted Jul-30-2012 By 

      (3)

  • but really who owns rain ??

    Posted Jul-30-2012 By 

    (3)

    • @kiska
      according to the Gvt, the gvt!.

      Posted Jul-30-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @aranger45

      No, according to the gvt, the people. The gvt just loves the power of control.

      Posted Jul-30-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @kiska no one, but when it falls on my property and becomes runoff its mine.

      Posted Jul-30-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @kiska They are more concerned about that rain being absorbed into the ground and going into the water table. Things like these will mess up people who are on well water which as remote as that looks they probably are. If the water doesnt fill up the water tables underground water cant be collected into wells or move towards the streams so they are saying him saving that water is harming others because he is keeping it from naturally working its way to the river. Dumb as shit but thats the gover More..

      Posted Jul-30-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @aranger45 and I heard we were giving our cleanest water to china to repay our debt converting an old episode of conspiracy theory right now that shows what I'm talking about

      Posted Jul-31-2012 By 

      (0)

  • Exactly, the ignorant and uninformed want to make this a tyrannical government story.

    Posted Jul-30-2012 By 

    (3)

  • You might want to link to an article describing what you are speaking about, as 99% of us have No Idea...

    Posted Jul-30-2012 By 

    (2)

  • Thank you for taking the time to find this. This image totally changes the case.

    If he's interfering with the flow of ground water, the authorities have every right to act.

    Posted Jul-30-2012 By 

    (1)

  • Good post. All of the others are misleading. Divert a stream or river and you're in a heap of trouble.

    Posted Jul-30-2012 By 

    (1)

    • @robd216 I didn't see any stream or river in that google shot. I thought it was rain water.

      Posted Jul-30-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @marc1921 I was looking for a river where they claimed he deverted the water but... wheres the river? I dont see any water diversion? looks to be deverting his own property rainwater if anything. And if diverting your own property rainwater is a crime...this truely is The End...

      Posted Jul-30-2012 By 

      (2)

    • Comment of user 'akaangus' has been deleted by author!
  • Are you speaking of the guy getting charged with hoarding rain water because he didnt have permits for the reservoirs? He did at one time, but some shit happened.

    Posted Jul-30-2012 By 

    (1)

    • Comment of user 'IIVXTII' has been deleted by author!
    • @IIVXTII lol they probably didnt realize the size of resoviors. I was thinking at most 1,000 gallons but those are man made lakes lol. Look at the sized of them compared to the houses

      Posted Jul-30-2012 By 

      (1)

  • Hippies suck.

    Posted Jul-31-2012 By 

    (0)

  • "At least let's be honest about what is being debated here." What the hell has honesty got to do with it when you are trying to grind an axe? I would be willing to bet that the vast majority of the "political" postings on LiveLeak are not honest representations of what is really going on.

    Posted Jul-31-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Skeeters that big a problem?

    Posted Jul-30-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Didn't this guy have like 175 acres? None of those look very deep, any estimates on how many gallons he was supposed to have dirverted? I haven't seen any numbers.

    Posted Jul-30-2012 By 

    (0)

  • is it causing problems for the enviornment or the people who live near by,, if so byby, off to jail

    Posted Jul-30-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Indeed.

    Posted Jul-30-2012 By 

    (0)

  • i have a good friend that lives in CO an it is illegal for anyone to have a rain barrels. they will fine and jail you there so the first story still has merit. However this is a good find and does make you wonder if there is more to the story. Or the ponds are not part of the equasion

    Posted Jul-30-2012 By 

    (0)

    • @aranger45 CO have some ridiculous laws LOL illegal to have rain water ahahaha pure insanity

      Posted Jul-30-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @j44k3 almost as hilarious as the law that you're not allowed to hang out wet clothes to dry on a washing line.

      Posted Jul-30-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @aranger45

      That's fine but that's not the case here.

      I might add he was not jailed for collecting rain water. That's what he claims but couldn't prove.

      He was charged with damming a tributary within a watershed.

      Very Big Difference.

      Posted Jul-30-2012 By 

      (3)