Safe Mode: On
Michael Savage - Liberals That Opposed Missile Defense are Now Silent that We need it

John Kerry, Ted Kennedy and the rest of the traitors in the Senate were relentless with their attacks against Ronald Reagan when he wanted to build the star wars missile defense system, but now they are silent that we need it.

The Russians were and still are against missile defense, because they see it as a threat to their ability to strike the USA at will. The progressive loons wanted us defenseless, but thank God Reagan did not let these communist saboteurs get their way.

theconservativemonster.com

Loading the player ...
Embed CodeSwitch Player
Plays: 7051 (Embed: 0)

Added: Jun-22-2009 Occurred On: Jun-19-2009
By: DeleteFrance
In:
News
Tags: michael savage, missile defense, north korea, hawaii, obama, democrats, liberals, john kerry, missile defense, ronald reagan
Views: 8776 | Comments: 26 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
'
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Pacifists work hand in hand with evil on the false and presumed promise that the pacifists will be slaughtered last.

    Posted Jun-22-2009 By 

    (3) | Report

  • seems like they are always on the wrong end of history

    Posted Jun-22-2009 By 

    (2) | Report

  • Missile defense has never, ever been a more important investment...BUT, the Dems always gut defense in the name of social spending.

    Posted Jun-22-2009 By 

    (1) | Report

  • What always gets me about liberals is not that they are so consistently wrong on so many common-sense issues like missile defense, but how they pay almost no political price when they are proven so obviously, ridiculously wrong. Then they just sort of blend into the viewpoint they opposed in the first place with hardly a comment.

    Posted Jun-22-2009 By 

    (1) | Report

  • "a suicidal insanity"
    Yes... At least BO backed off his moronic plan to dismantle our nuclear arsenal.

    Posted Jun-22-2009 By 

    (0) | Report

  • Liberals have been trying to dismantle any and all attempts at building up a missile defense system for the past 30 years. They have always said it was too costly (they needed more handout money for their peasants). I guess losing Hawaii or Alaska isn't going to cost us that much.

    Posted Jun-22-2009 By 

    (0) | Report

    • NK missiles could "theoretically" reach Alaska or Hawaii in the last administration and they didn't do much about it.
      As for Star Wars - no amount of money was going to make that program a reality for more than a decade and Russia was the only threat according to that administration. We simply didn't have the technology to intercept an ICBM in the 80's -or the 90's for that matter. To be honest - in the early part of this decade - we could only get a 1 in 10 intercept ratio... Even n More..

      Posted Jun-22-2009 By 

      (0) | Report

  • Michael Weiner referring to anyone as having a "mental disorder" is a hoot.

    Go back a few weeks and review his hysterical, ignorant raving about the nature of the Swine
    Flu, and the idea that it was a terrorist attack.

    We have interceptors in California and Alaska. We have mobile interception systems on our warships.

    No missile defense can protect us from a full scale attack from Russia, but we are more than capeable of dealing with the extremely unlikely event that North Ko More..

    Posted Jun-23-2009 By 

    (0) | Report

  • Where are all the pussified liberals here on LL? The usual suspects will only dismiss Savage as a kook and misguided, typical responses we have come to know.

    Posted Jun-22-2009 By 

    (-1) | Report

    • Savage is a psychotic, essentially. He is worshipped by undereducated republican cattle, also refferred to as "fuks news zombies".

      :-)

      P.S. Educated people know that North Korea is not a threath

      Posted Jun-22-2009 By 

      (-3) | Report

    • lol, he has been conspiculously absent since the protests in Iran started.

      funny how many of the "joooo haters" and hamas/hizbollacks supporters have either disappeared or have gone absolutely nuts lately.

      is it their hypocrisy or the obvious irony?...

      Posted Jun-22-2009 By 

      (-1) | Report

    • I guess that makes you uneducated, since Russia has essentially came out and said North Korea is indeed a threat.

      You're such a weekend warrior in a foreign policy fantasy. North Korea is popping nukes off like 4th of July firecrackers behind the tool shed and they aren't a threat. This country's apathy is a sickening and hideous disease of the first order.

      Wake UP.

      Posted Jun-22-2009 By 

      (0) | Report

    • You wake up ... the yield of North Korean bomb is insignificant. Obama administration knowns that and will not start another front of the republican insanity called "war against terrorism". 911 was caused by lack of diligence and competence from CIA and FBI, that allowed a bunch on weird muslim monkeys to take pilot lessons and fly jet into WTC.

      Republican responses to 911 was to plunge the USA into bogus wars and bankrupcy, instead of taking care of economic issues.

      Posted Jun-22-2009 By 

      (0) | Report

    • Oh, I'm sorry. The yield of a North Korean nuke is exactly what then? This must make it all better then. Just a small little BOOM in Honolulu instead of just erasing the island from the map?

      Wake up and flush out your ear holes.

      Posted Jun-22-2009 By 

      (0) | Report

  • test

    Posted Jun-22-2009 By 

    (-3) | Report

  • Too bad conservative cattle is not edible :-(.

    Posted Jun-22-2009 By 

    (-3) | Report