Vanity Fair The Magazine
Editor’s Letter
Man Up, America!
By Graydon Carter
December 2010
W ell, anger certainly continues to be all the rage in the corridors of American politics. Not to mention American corridors in general. Polls taken prior to the November midterm election indicated that a surprising number of Obama voters said they were going to vote Republican this time and an equally surprising number of McCain supporters said they would be backing Democratic candidates. What that is about, God knows. The general anti-Obama rage out there is palpable. But it’s no more virulent than the anti-Bush sentiment that has pervaded the country for much of the past decade—although this being America, there’s an attendant hatred for Obama that has more to do with race than anything else. What makes today’s fury more worrying is the fact that angry right-wing extremists tend to carry guns in disproportionate numbers to their liberal counterparts.
A distinguished colleague of mine likens the wiggy mood of the nation to that of a hormonal teenager. What do you call an electorate that seems prone to acting out irrationally, is full of inchoate rage, and is constantly throwing fits and tantrums? You call it teenaged. Is voting for a deranged Tea Party candidate such as Christine O’Donnell, who has no demonstrable talent for lawmaking, or much else, so different from shouting “Whatever!” and slamming the bedroom door? Is moaning that Obama doesn’t emote enough or get sufficiently angry so different from screaming, “You don’t understand!!!”
What headline writers a generation or two ago called the Silent Majority has become the Angry Majority. And we should have seen this coming. Both Bush and Obama, believing that their elections gave them mandates for seismic change, yanked the nation away from the center, which Bill Clinton, despite the morass of his personal life, knew was the place to be. Thanks to these dramatic political lurches—and aided by the exponential magnification of the Internet and the seething blogosphere, and with the martinets at the command center at Fox News marshaling forces—the fringe has achieved considerable purchase on the middle ground. Indeed, the fringe has almost become mainstream.
This anger-fest is in no way confined to America. Indeed, in Europe it is becoming even uglier, what with anti-immigrant sentiment on the rise, especially against Muslims and Gypsies. In Britain, a growing anti-Islam group, the English Defence League, holds demonstrations almost monthly, usually in areas where there are high concentrations of Muslim immigrants. These protests are almost always accompanied by violence. In Germany, where 30 percent of the electorate believes the country is “overrun by foreigners,” Chancellor Angela Merkel gave a speech recently in which she declared that the country’s attempt to build a multicultural society has failed utterly. (And the Germans are usually so good at this.) French president Nicolas Sarkozy and Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi have both ordered the expulsion of Romanian Gypsies. In Sweden, a small number of Jews, having suffered at the hands of the local Muslim population, have just given up and immigrated to Israel. Even in sleepy little Holland, Geert Wilders, the far-right politician who heads the third-largest party in the country—and who holds the balance of power in the Dutch parliament—is on trial for inciting hatred against Muslims by, among other things, comparing the Koran to Mein Kampf.
It is not surprising that during these times we yearn for tales of another era, when the stakes were high and the choices more clear-cut. A spate of superb World War II books have come out this season, including Juliet Gardiner’s The Blitz: The British Under Attack (published in September, in the U.K.). When Americans refer to 9/11 as the day the world changed, they should be mindful of what London went through in the early days of the Second World War. On September 7, 1940, 348 Luftwaffe bombers crossed the English Channel. They were over London by late afternoon and for the next two hours ignited the city with incendiary bombs. That same evening, the Germans were back, raining 625 tons of high explosives on East London. The Blitz (from the German Blitzkrieg, for “lightning war”) went on for 57 consecutive nights and then spread to other cities in the U.K. It was estimated that by May of the next year more than 43,000 people had died in the strategic air raids. The English, being the English, just got on with it. A survey taken during this period found that weather had a greater impact than air raids on the day-to-day worries of many Londoners. As Gardiner observes, “egg rationing produced more emotion than the blitz.”
Americans were not without their own tales of epic struggle during the war. One such saga is told in Unbroken: A World War II Story of Survival, Resilience, and Redemption, by Laura Hillenbrand. Her last book, Seabiscuit, published nine years ago, was a masterpiece of nonfiction narrative, and made for a pretty terrific movie too. Unbroken is a more than worthy follow-up. In it, Hillenbrand tells the story of Louie Zamperini, a former Olympic track star for the U.S. who at 23 came close to breaking the four-minute mile. He made a heroic but losing effort in the 5,000 meters at the Berlin Games, in 1936, and would have been a gold-medal contender at the planned 1940 Tokyo Olympics had they not been canceled because of the war. Louie entered the service a few months before Pearl Harbor. Serving as a bombardier in the Pacific, he and the rest of his B-24 crew set out from Hawaii on May 27, 1943, on an emergency search-and-rescue mission. Louie wouldn’t set foot on American soil again for almost two and a half years. His wartime saga began, as does our excerpt, with a plane crash, followed by an almost unbelievably harrowing experience adrift on a life raft in the middle of the Pacific. He and two fellow airmen battled starvation, eating only the occasional raw albatross or fish. Zamperini’s story is certainly one of the most remarkable survival tales ever recorded. What happened after that is equally remarkable. Do yourself and the publishing industry a favor and buy the book after you read our excerpt, “Adrift but Unbroken.”
When you consider what this one man endured, or the entire city of London, whatever annoyances are bothering you, whatever problems you have in your own life, will seem minor by comparison. America, you have it pretty damned good. Smile.
![]()
Click to view image: ' Graydon Carter'
By: gmccuiston
In: Other
Tags: Graydon Carter, Editor's Letter
Marked as: approved
Views: 7892 | Comments: 21 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
Governor Brewer responds to Senator Schumer's letter
-
Irish React Angrily to Pope's Letter
-
Childish superstition: Einstein's letter makes view of religion relatively clear
-
JFK's Letter To Israeli PM Eshkol July 5, 1963
-
Afghanistan's Letter Writers
-
Rush Announces eBay Charity Auction of Harry Reid's Letter
-
A Soldier's Letter
-
City Hall Bullets Get Presidential Attention - AG's Letter to Obama
-
Prophet Muhammad's Letter to The Emperor of Rome
-
Politician's Letter to a Drug Dealer - My first post
-
Schwarzenegger`s letter to a democratic party member spells "Fuck you"





Attempting to explain the anti-Obama sentiment as a racial issue is the most worn-out, overused nonsense in the entire political arena today. It's on par with the most whacked-out conspiracy theories. Do you libs honestly think that conservatives would have reacted any less if, say, Al Gore was elected president? Of course not. It's not his race, it's what he stands for, it's far-left progressive liberalism, it's Marxist wealth redistributionism with a friendly face. THAT is what the right is up More..
Posted Nov-7-2010 Byleadfoot88 (266.92) leadfoot88 View Channel Send Message
(12)
"A distinguished colleague of mine likens the wiggy mood of the nation to that of a hormonal teenager. What do you call an electorate that seems prone to acting out irrationally, is full of inchoate rage, and is constantly throwing fits and tantrums? You call it teenaged."
Teenaged. That sums up the left to a T. Most liberals are perpetual teenagers.
Posted Nov-7-2010 Byleadfoot88 (266.92) leadfoot88 View Channel Send Message
(10)
That sums up most ALL voters and partisan fanatacists to a T. Very few people understand this divided system, and that's exactly why they are trying to rip it apart. Both sides need to WTFU!
Posted Nov-7-2010 Bydaleastor (892.76) daleastor View Channel Send Message
(5)
WTFU and do what? What do you think needs to be done
differently? How would you fix it?
Posted Nov-7-2010 Bygmccuiston (687.28) gmccuiston View Channel Send Message
(-3)
People would rip the system apart the instant they truly understood it.
Posted Nov-7-2010 Byleadfoot88 (266.92) leadfoot88 View Channel Send Message
(3)
You miss my point. I don't think it needs to be fixed at all. I think it's a machine that runs perfectly well, and is ever progressing. The US has gone through far more difficult times than these. I am a true patriot, and I do my part. However, I do get the feeling now and then that most everyone needs to "wake the fuck up". Including myself. You jumping my ass? I don't understand.
Posted Nov-7-2010 Bydaleastor (892.76) daleastor View Channel Send Message
(2)
I think you might be right with that! :)
Posted Nov-7-2010 Bydaleastor (892.76) daleastor View Channel Send Message
(1)
This was one of the worst articles I have ever read. It's wordy, and bounces back and forth between fact and fiction. The entire piece is a grammatical nightmare, and very poorly put together. I would expect more from the Editor of Vanity Fair magazine.
Posted Nov-7-2010 Byradiofreak (315.06) 
radiofreak View Channel Send Message
(3)
I don't, this is exactly what they are about. Childish name calling.
Posted Nov-7-2010 Bycrapper (59.82) 
crapper View Channel Send Message
(1)
This guys is complaining about Europes drift to the right? Exactly what have progressive liberals done for Europe thats worth saving? Its because of liberal policies that Europe is in the current mess to begin with.
Posted Nov-7-2010 Bysun-warrior (132.16) sun-warrior View Channel Send Message
(2)
WTF wrote that mess a school-girl?
Yeah the system works, barely, and only until someone decides they don't want to obey the rule of law.
Much like the Chump in Chief.
America needs to impeach Obama, yesterday.
Posted Nov-7-2010 ByDave556 (2006.46) 
Dave556 View Channel Send Message
(2)
Monkeys learn new word. Word iz Liberals.
Posted Nov-7-2010 ByGlobocyde (108.36) Globocyde Send Message
(1)
Big brother is a very serious threat. Why people think that governments care about them or that the solution to everything involves government is beyond me.
Posted Nov-7-2010 Byou81aswell (37.66) ou81aswell View Channel Send Message
(1)
Based on his hairstyle, he should be immediately dismissed.
Hey Graydon, Thomas Jefferson called and he wants his hairdo back.
Posted Nov-7-2010 Bycat-scratch-fever (521.84) cat-scratch-fever View Channel Send Message
(0)
His rant about the public, and "our" low foreheads as compared to his progressiveness. Only goes to show how little the man has for the public having the right to vote. Only "intellectuals" as esteemed as himself and his rightful thought progressives should have the right to vote.
If liberals as far left as this dufus, and other intellectuals of the elite progressive liberals had their way. There wouldn't be elections. Only SAT tests to prove you are worthy of civil offic More..
Posted Nov-7-2010 ByLess1leg (352.06) Less1leg View Channel Send Message
(0)
Remember, his first name is Graydon. That's all that matters here.
Posted Nov-7-2010 ByRoll1981 (221.04) 
Roll1981 View Channel Send Message
(-1)
Silence, you wiggy inchoates!
Posted Nov-7-2010 ByIntellectual (772.04) Intellectual View Channel Send Message
(-2)
Fuckin L O L !
Posted Nov-7-2010 Bydaleastor (892.76) daleastor View Channel Send Message
(0)