Safe Mode: On
Biometrics in Argentina: Mass Surveillance as a State Policy

Two years ago, the UK dismantled
their national ID scheme and shredded their National Identity Registry
in response to great public outcry over the privacy-invasive program.
Unfortunately privacy protections have been less rosy elsewhere. In
Argentina, the national ID fight was lost some time ago. A law enacted
during the military dictatorship forced all individuals to obtain a government-mandated ID.
Now, they are in the process of enhancing its mandatory National
Registry of Persons (RENAPER) with biometric data such as fingerprints
and digitized faces. The government plans to repurpose this database in
order to facilitate “easy access
to law enforcement by merging this data into a new, security-focused
integrated system. This raises the specter of mass surveillance, as
Argentinean law enforcement will have access to mass repositories of
citizen information and be able to leverage existing facial recognition
and fingerprint matching technologies in order to identify any citizen
anywhere.
In the waning days of 2011, Argentinean President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner issued an executive decree ordering the creation of the Federal System of Biometric Identification (SIBIOS), a new centralized, nation-wide biometric ID service that will allow law enforcement to cross-reference
information with biometric and other data initially collected for the
purpose of operating a general national ID registry. Historically,
police fingerprint databases were limited to those suspected or
convicted of criminal offences. Recently, however, the Argentinean
Federal Police (Policía Federal Argentina – PFA) was given a large
database holding digital fingerprints collected from random Argentineans
as part of the national ID and passport application process. Since
March 2011, this database has been fed by data collected through the
RENAPER national ID application process. The PFA has managed to amass a
database of about 8 million fingerprints,
yet this process appears to have been too slow for the Argentinean
government. Further to the new decree, the SIBIOS initiative will give PFA access to RENAPER’s database (and vice versa), doubling PFA’s reach to approximately 14 million digitized fingerprints. Starting with the first New Year’s baby of 2012, Argentina has even begun registering newborn biometric information with the SIBIOS. Argentina
projects that, as national IDs and passports expire and are renewed
(and new babies are born), the SIBIOS database will grow to over 40
million within the next two years.
But the SIBIOS initiative will do far more than expand the number of digitized fingerprints the FPA will have ready access to. According to President Fernández de Kirchner, the SIBIOS will be fully
“integrated” with existing ID card databases, which, aside from
biometric identifiers, include an individuals’ digital image, civil
status, blood type, and key background information collected since her
birth and across the various life stages. Further, it is not just the
FPA that will have access to this new information sharing system. SIBIOS
is designated for use by other federal security forces, including the
National Directorate of Immigration, the Airport Security Police, and
the National Gendarmerie, and is even available to Provincial
enforcement entities, upon agreement with the National State.
However, there has been no public discussion about the conditions under
which public officials will have access to the data. Supporters of the
SIBIOS program tout that it would give law enforcement easy, real-time
access to individuals’ data, but whether any of the safeguards typically
used to put checks on state surveillance will limit access remains an
open question.
Perhaps the most troubling part of this new
SIBIOS initiative is the technologies Argentinean law enforcement
intends to leverage in order to exploit these databases. The FPA, for
example, will be able to use its new facial recognition capacities
to search the immense RENAPER digital image repository in order to
identify people in photos, and maybe even on surveillance cameras!
Argentinean police are also equipping themselves with mobile fingerprinting devices that will allow them to check the fingerprints of any passing Argentinean against the database itself.
The Dangers of Surveillance Society



National IDs and similar methods of data centralization increase state capacity for intrusive surveillance. Coupled with the simultaneous collection of biometric identifiers,
such as digitized faces, it creates an additional layer of tracking
that is even more pervasive and dangerous. As is the case in Argentina,
biometrics are inherently individuating and interfaces easily with
database technology, making widespread privacy violations easier and
more harmful.
To our alarm, President Fernández de Kirchner has gone so far as to embrace
the potential to link unidentified faces obtained through surveillance
cameras with identified images through the SIBIOS system. Due to the
technology’s relative affordability, street cameras and
video-surveillance are now everywhere. Therefore this functionality is
especially dangerous with the potential to lead to mass political
surveillance. (This visualization shows how there are over 1,000 cameras installed in the Argentinian capital of Buenos Aires alone.)
Given the prevalence of street cameras and how easy it has become to identify one unnamed face amidst thousands,
individuals who care about their privacy and anonymity will have a very
difficult time protecting their identity from biometrics databases in
the imminent future. There are extreme unforeseen risks in a world where
an individual’s photo, taken from a street camera or a social network,
can be linked to their national ID card. Additionally, matching
technologies will only improve with time. (Check here and here to learn more about facial recognition). EFF has long argued that perfect tracking is inimical to a free and democratic society.
Citizens have a reasonable expectation of privacy and anonymity,
particularly with regard to profiling. A combination of government-run biometric
ID systems and facial recognition violates core elements of freedom by
making it easy to locate and track people, and dangerously centralizing
this data makes it ripe for state exploitation.
As Beatriz Busaniche of Fundacion Via Libre notes, this type of mass surveillance can have serious repercussions for those who are willing to voice political dissent:



“In the name of public security,
Argentina has pushed for mass surveillance policies, including the
heightened monitoring of public spaces. Privacy is particularly crucial
for our country since throughout our long history of social and
political movements, calls for action have often taken to the streets.
It is of higher importance for activists to remain anonymous in their
demonstrations, especially when they are at odds with the government
itself. In this way, SIBIOS not only challenges their privacy and data
protection rights, but also poses serious threats to their civil and
political rights.”

Mora Arqueta, Director of RENAPER, noted in an interview
that the current purpose of the national ID scheme is to retain the
“maximum amount of personal data, and treat the citizen as an individual
who interacts with the State in many places.” Her comments admit to a
direct perversion of the existing national identification system, from
one that has simply assigned an ID number to an individual, to one that
outright violates personal data minimization principles through massive
and unnecessary collection of sensitive personal information. The
problem with allowing the government to retain so much sensitive data
is that it gives it too much unchecked concentrated power. One wonders,
for example, whether those who enacted the decree considered what would
have occurred if Argentina's military dictatorship had access to such an
expansive database. The public debate in Argentina should therefore be
about power and the possible limits of actors in society to know. A
healthy amount of distrust is necessary to sustain an open, democratic
society.

Fernández de Kirchner’s arguments that SIBIOS provides “a
major qualitative leap in security, in the fight against crime” are
troubling and represent a further deviation from the purpose for which
the RENAPER databases were first created. This argument is misleading,
and fails to analyze SIBIOS’ risks and limitations as well as its impact on civil liberties and data protection. Time and again, we have heard the dubious rhetorical argument that biometrics are needed to fight against crime and increase security. In fact, these massive
biometrics databases are a honeypot of sensitive data that remains
extremely vulnerable for exploitation by criminals and identity thieves
themselves.

The rights to privacy and data protection are enshrined in international law and the Argentinean Constitution.
Given the long list of privacy concerns surrounding biometrics, and the
plausibility of future security breaches, it is irrationally excessive
to collect biometric data in a nation-wide ID scheme. The
Argentinean government needs to limit the unnecessary collection,
processing, retention, and sharing of this very sensitive data. EFF and Fundacion Via Libre in Argentina will work together to fight against these intrusive measures.
Source: EFF - Electronic Frontier Foundation

 
Poll

Added: Oct-24-2013 Occurred On: Jan-10-2012
By: XaYdEk
In:
Science and Technology
Tags: Surveillance, Argentina, biometrics, old news,
Location: Argentina (load item map)
Views: 933 | Comments: 13 | Votes: 1 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE