Safe Mode: On
Does Anyone else see a problem here?
 Part of channel(s): Yoursay (promoted)

November 3, 2008 A new video has surfaced clearly showing the demolition of WTC Building 7.

In its latest report, the National Institute of Standards and Technology attempted to once and for all put to rest the evidence that the building was taken down via demolition by explaining that fires had caused the collapse. Specifically, NIST claimed thermal expansion had brought about the collapse. As Trish Stevens notes, the NIST report is contrary to all historical, visual, and physical evidence, according to an independent worldwide organization composed of more than 470 engineers and architects. WTC-7 was a 47-story skyscraper located more than a football field away from the North Tower and was not hit by any airplane, yet completely collapsed hours after the Twin Towers fell in a similar manner.

Dr. Steven Jones says there is an abundance of evidence which NIST refuses to look at or even account for that clearly points to controlled demolition as the source that destroyed these buildings.

As the new video clearly reveals, the center supporting columns of the 47-story building were taken out, allowing the building to collapse into its footprint in a symmetrical, straight down fashion. This is controlled demolition, averred demolitions expert Danny Jowenko in 2006. A team of experts did this. This is professional work, without any doubt.

In 2007, a 9/11 first responder went on the record to describe how he heard a demolition-style countdown precede the collapse of WTC 7. Earlier this year, we reported on the testimony of an anonymous EMT named Mike who told Loose Change producer Dylan Avery that hundreds of emergency rescue personnel were told over bullhorns that Building 7, a 47 story skyscraper adjacent the twin towers that was not hit by a plane yet imploded symmetrically later in the afternoon on 9/11, was about to be pulled and that a 20 second radio countdown preceded its collapse, writes Paul Joseph Watson. That account was backed up by another ground zero rescue worker who went on the record with her full name. Volunteer EMT Indira Singh described to a radio show how she learned that WTC 7 was going to be brought down and the context was clear that it was to be deliberately demolished.

The whole time youre hearing boom, boom, boom, boom, boom. I think I know an explosion when I hear it, NYPD officer Craig Bartmer revealed last year. Bartmer stated his incredulity at how fast the Building 7 site was cleaned up compared to the rest of ground zero.

In addition, other ground zero emergency workers have gone on record as stating they were told Building 7 was to be pulled. An anonymous source, identified simply as Mike, told Loose Change producer Dylan Avery that hundreds of emergency rescue personnel were told over bullhorns that Building 7 was to be brought down.

An yet, if we are to believe NIST and FEMA, fires are responsible for the classical demolition of the building. Now that we have a video that clearly and irrefutably shows that Building 7 was indeed brought down by demolition, the response of NIST and FEMA will be interesting.

http://www.infowars.com/?p=5721

Loading the player ...
Embed Code
Plays: 10282 (Embed: 0)

Added: Nov-14-2008 
By: Illuminated1234
In:
Your Say
Tags: wtc7, , north, , tower, , world, , trade, , center, , collapse, , controlled, , demolition, , footage, , view, , angle, , explosions, , 9/11, , 911, , 9-11, , september, , 11, , steven, , jones, , david, , ron, , paul, , 4409, , --, , shocking, , unseen,
Marked as: approved
Views: 12112 | Comments: 85 | Votes: 6 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 1 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 4
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • 9/11 was an outside job.

    Posted Nov-14-2008 By 

    (10)

  • Anyone who's ever seen a demolition knows they cannot possibly hide the fact charges are in the building. There is thousands of feet of wire connecting everything together and they can't hide it in the walls.

    A controlled demolition is a very tricky thing to pull off, the beams have to be cut, charges placed, wire run everywhere and in order to do that most internal walls would have been torn out.

    No matter how good these people are, there is no way they can hide the fact demolition charges we More..

    Posted Nov-14-2008 By 

    (8)

  • Why does metal music make the argument more valid? Always with the metal.

    How about some Frank Sinatra for once.

    Posted Nov-14-2008 By 

    (6)

  • Comment of user 'strudders' has been deleted by moderator!
  • if people studied architecture and thermal properties they would know (1) the first tower collapsed because the plane penetrated into the lift and servive shafts allowing large ammounts of air to be drawn up to the fire causing the central structure to eventually implode the building. (2) the second tower was struck at an angle breaking many windows also the tower exterior was made of material with a lower thermal fail rate than tower 1 , jet fuel plus lots of flammables plus updraft (air) equa More..

    Posted Nov-14-2008 By 

    (5)

    • Comment of user 'kawboi' has been deleted by moderator!
    • You had noticed this was WTC7 hadn't you?
      You know, the one that was not struck by a plane, that one.

      Posted Nov-14-2008 By 

      (-7)

    • Aw maaan!

      That sounds like the madman who shoots his whole family of 25 people and later he says "sorry, i was cleaning my weapon when it suddenly went off"

      You cant tell me that you believe that shit???

      Posted Nov-15-2008 By 

      (1)

    • not to mention concrete provided by the mob, which I'm sure would have failed a slump test

      Posted Nov-15-2008 By 

      (-1)

    • wether the towers came down because of the planes or possible explosives is irrelevant,who really planned and executed this event is the real question.

      Posted Oct-29-2009 By 

      (1)

  • Yawn. More 9/11 conspiracy BS. Wackos in hijacked planes got lucky, once. End of story.

    Posted Nov-14-2008 By 

    (4)

  • Ignorance is bliss.

    Posted Nov-14-2008 By 

    (4)

  • Comment of user 'richy_dong' has been deleted by moderator!
  • That aint new man, at least seven years old;

    Posted Nov-14-2008 By 

    (4)

  • How 911 Happened, 1 guy in a cave told 19 other cave dwellers hey go learn to fly a plane and I will get all of you 1,144 virgins. So they learned how to fly jumbo jets crashed into 2 buildings so hard that 3 fell. and well you all know the rest...

    Posted Nov-14-2008 By 

    (4)

    • Comment of user 'Mastiphal' has been deleted by moderator!
    • Comment of user 'KingLawahaha' has been deleted by moderator!
    • Typical tin foil hat response.

      Don't believe my opinion, then you must be a moron. Some superiority complex you have there.

      Posted Nov-14-2008 By 

      (1)

    • Comment of user 'Mastiphal' has been deleted by moderator!
    • Comment of user 'Mastiphal' has been deleted by moderator!
  • get your tin foil hats 5 dollers a pop buy four and you get a free labotamy get your tin foil hats here

    Posted Nov-14-2008 By 

    (3)

  • Comment of user 'sixguinness' has been deleted by author!
  • Comment of user 'figatova' has been deleted by author!
  • After 2 of the worlds tallest buildings crashed down upon it, the structure was damaged causing it to fail. This was also the plan of the first terrorists who bombed the towers. The terrorist engineers surmised that even the collapse of one building would likely bring the others down..

    There were two attacks since 2001, the first was the planes that brought the tower down. The second attack was a misinformation campaign waged by the enemies of America in an attempt to turn the people against th More..

    Posted Nov-14-2008 By 

    (3)

    • Comment of user 'sixguinness' has been deleted by author!
  • I like the conspiracy theory, it makes me giggle.

    Posted Nov-14-2008 By 

    (3)