Safe Mode: On
The Immorality of Obamanomics

How Obama Blew It!
Lying, stealing, and corruption are its fundaments.

The President's economic policies are usually criticized for their practical ineffectiveness. Thinking people know that the result of the President's 1970s retro economic policies has been the worst recovery from a recession since the Great Depression, with persistent high unemployment, declining real wages and incomes, soaring poverty, doubling gas prices, and budding inflation sure to get much worse.

Unthinking people still call national conservative talk radio shows to say the President's economic policies can't be faulted because the economy was doing poorly when he entered office, and so his policies enjoy unlimited time to produce any positive results. They make national fools of themselves in so demonstrating that they know nothing about the historical prosperity of their own country, and why.

But there is a much more fundamental problem. Besides not working, the policies of Obamanomics are just plain immoral.

The 99 Percent vs. The 1 Percent
Since when has it been considered just for the bottom 99 percent to say to the top 1 percent, "We can outvote you to take your money"? That is a politics of piracy and theft, with no roots in American history.

Sure the richest can be validly asked to bear proportionally more of the overall tax burden because they can do so with the least harm. But before President Obama was even elected, official IRS data shows that in 2007 the top 1 percent of income earners paid 40.4 percent of all federal income taxes, almost twice their share of adjusted gross income. The top 5 percent paid 60.6 percent of all federal income taxes, while earning 37.7 percent of adjusted gross income. The top 10 percent paid 71.2 percent of all income taxes, while earning 48 percent of adjusted gross income.

By contrast, the bottom 95 percent of income earners paid 39.4 percent of all federal income taxes. That means the top 1 percent of income earners paid more federal income taxes than the bottom 95 percent combined!

Moreover, in 2007, again before President Obama was even elected, the bottom 40 percent of income earners as a group paid no federal income taxes. Instead, they received net payments from the income tax system equal to 3.8 percent of all federal income taxes. In other words, they paid negative 3.8 percent of federal income taxes. The middle 20 percent of income earners, the actual middle class, paid 4.7 percent of all federal income taxes.

What this adds up to is that even before President Obama was elected America already maintained the most progressive income tax system in the western world, maybe the entire world. Moreover, that was the result of almost 30 years of Reagan Republican supply-side economics that began with Reagan and Jack Kemp in the 1970s and 1980s, continued through Newt Gingrich and his Contract with America, and further played out with the Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003. When President Reagan brought his supply-side economics to Washington in 1981, the share of federal income taxes paid by the top 1 percent was 17.6 percent. After a quarter century of rate cuts, that share had more than doubled by 2007 to 40.4 percent, as noted above. That is because with the lower tax rates, incomes boomed along with the economy, and high income taxpayers had the incentives to pull their money out of tax shelters and invest it in the real economy, fueling the boom while increasing their reported income. But so-called Progressives (we should start calling them throwbacks instead) can't understand these dynamics of modern capitalism.

Yet, we have a President who continually barnstorms the country calling for still more tax increases on the "rich," articulating precisely the policies of the Marxist Occupy Wall Street movement, which reflects precisely his own roots. He says that is necessary for "the rich" to pay their "fair share," when the facts as cited above indisputably show that "the rich" already pay far more than their fair share, and did so even before President Obama was elected. America has featured politicians that lie to the public from its founding. But never have we had a President that bases his whole pitch to the American people on a Big Lie that is so unhinged from reality it is just the opposite of the truth.

Given the factual reality as described above, raising taxes even more on the 1 percent would be immoral theft, not fairness. For rabble rousers and street agitators to threaten to lead the 99 percent to so loot the 1 percent is immoral demagoguery that demeans our democracy. It is the politics of Venezuela and Argentina, not America. For President Obama to continually barnstorm the country presenting a picture of America that is the exact opposite of the truth as discussed above is immoral dishonesty.

Added: May-6-2012 Occurred On: May-6-2012
By: americanpatriot1970
Tags: Obamanomics, commie, waste of taxpayers dollars, class war!
Location: United States (load item map)
Views: 1446 | Comments: 12 | Votes: 1 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • it has been the worst 31/2 years of my adult life.

    Posted May-6-2012 By 

    (5) | Report

  • The problem with gov't economic that the gov't HAS economic policies!!!!!!!!!!! Free Market, Supply and Demand!! That's what the economy needs, not gov't idiots who know didly squat(most who have never run a fucking bussiness) deciding what is best for bussiness's!

    Posted May-6-2012 By 

    (4) | Report

  • Great post, and truthful. Division, jealousy and greed and the hallmarks of this president and his campaign. It's shameful.

    Posted May-6-2012 By 

    (2) | Report

  • Just remember the facts....

    The next president after Obama will inherit the worst economy since the great depression and the largest deficit in American History. The next president will inherit record high gas prices, record high food prices, massive unemployment, a healthcare system that has been turned on its head, a social security system trillions in the red, a Medicare system that is broke, a medicaid system that is broke, and a housing market that is on it's back. They will also inherit a More..

    Posted May-6-2012 By 

    (2) | Report

  • Comment of user 'buoymarker' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • Comment of user 'Eva_Destruction' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,, he's following Bush's economic policies, but since he's black and I'm an imbecile racist, I have to parrot the Republitard talking points.

    My name is americanpatriot1970 and I approve this message.

    Posted May-6-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

  • Nothing more grotesque than listening the poor mouthing propaganda for the rich. You sound mindless, like the brainwashed Chinese under Mao.

    For your information, the rich despise you rednecks and tea party people, even while you carry water for them like trained beasts of burden.

    Posted May-6-2012 By 

    (-1) | Report