terrorist operations conducted by Israel in the late 20th century included the murder of 220 US Marines and 21 other servicemen in a massive bombing in Beirut (to teach the Americans not to interfere in Lebanon), the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing of a Federal building by Jews including Andreas Strassmeir and Daniel Spiegelman which killed 168 (blamed on "white supremacist" patsies in order to discredit US patriots), the 1985 hijacking of the Achille Lauro by "Abu Abbas" who killed a disabled American Jewish tourist and threw his body and his wheelchair overboard (to turn world opinion against Arabs and in favour of Israel), the murder of British policewoman Yvonne Fletcher in 1984 (another false-flag operation that was blamed on "Libya"), and other acts blamed on "Abu Nidal" (a zionist agent) and his "Black September" group. When briefing and remunerating their agents, Mossad katsas would sometimes pose as Sicilian dons. In addition to JFK, targets of Mossad assassination squads included Robert Maxwell, and Gerald Bull (who designed and worked on a "supergun" project for Iraq).

In February and March of 2001, the zionist-controlled Fox TV network broadcast a documentary titled "Conspiracy Theory - Did We Land on the Moon?" on the notion that the Apollo landings were a hoax, with scenes having been filmed in a US desert. The evidence that the Apollo landings were faked is much weaker than the evidence that they were genuine. The motive for the timing of these Fox broadcasts was zionist foreknowledge of a massive Mossad false-flag terrorist operation that was planned for the second half of that very year. The zionists knew that sceptics would be able to prove that the official government account of the forthcoming major event was false, and it would not be possible to refute the sceptics with rational arguments. Hence, it would be necessary to resort to ad hominem attacks in which they would be portrayed as tin-foil-hatted crackpot conspiracy theorists, in the same mould as the Apollo Moon landings sceptics.

On May 4, 2001, Rabbi Dov Zakheim was sworn in as Comptroller at the Pentagon, overseeing its (then) $300 billion budget. On
September 10, 2001 (well aware that it would be a good time to "bury bad news"), Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld declared at a press conference that, according to some estimates, they could not track $2.3 trillion in transactions. After the audit had uncovered a massive black hole in the Pentagon's finances, Zakheim remained at the helm for more than two years until resigning in April 2004. Zakheim, a dual nationality Israeli-American and a rabid Zionist, had co-authored "Rebuilding America's Defenses", a position paper by the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) in 2000, which called for a new "Pearl Harbor" type of incident which would provide a pretext for US military moves to boost its global hegemony. Throughout much of his career he was working for the US government at the Department of Defense (DoD) or as a foreign policy adviser. However, in the run-up to 9/11, from 1997 to 2001, he left to take a post as CEO of System Planning Corporation (SPC). SPC is a manufacturer of highly sophisticated technology which enables remote operators to control up to eight planes simultaneously, from a single position either on the ground or airborne (or, say, in WTC Building 7). The technology also provides operators with the capability to take remote control of aircraft already in flight.

Zionists had tricked the Bush Administration into carrying out a relatively small scale false-flag terrorist operation. An unmanned, remote-controlled plane would be crashed into a section of the Pentagon that was under renovation; hence, casualties would range from zero to very low. The remote control technology for the Pentagon incident would be provided by Raytheon. Since it was necessary to claim that "Arabs" had hijacked a passenger plane and the US government had not signed up to deliberately murder dozens of their own civilians as part of Operation Pentagate, the claimed flight that the "suicide pilots" had taken over would be one that ran fairly regularly, but was unscheduled on the particular day of the operation. The Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) flight records could be falsified after the fact - unless, of course, the planners were to slip up, as they did...

The "dead passengers" were to be individuals linked to government (e.g. Barbara Olson), and the defense contractor Raytheon, who would be paid to fake their own deaths and provided with sanctuary in Israel. As confirmation of the official version of events, it would be claimed that the "passengers" had made cell phone calls to report a hijacking by men of "Arabic" appearance. (Never mind the fact that such cell phone calls were impossible with 2001 technology at cruising height and speed; the fact that it takes at least an hour and 30 kg of coke to cremate a cadaver had not stopped the indoctrination of millions of people with a physically impossible ludicrous conspiracy theory about a secret German plot to gas and cremate 11 million "undesirables".) If required, fictitious names could be concocted. In order to save on names, it would be claimed that the passenger count just happened to be unusually low that day, say, around one-third of capacity.

American Airlines Flight 77 from Washington Dulles to Los Angeles was scheduled on most days, but was not scheduled (and did not fly) on September 11, 2001. The date had been chosen from the US "911" emergency number. Hence, the official Bush-Cheney story would claim this as the plane which hit the Pentagon. The Bush Administration would then have a pretext for invading Islamic oil-rich nations and looting their oil wealth, and for granting itself with authoritarian powers by introducing legislation such as the Patriot Act. More to the point, Rumsfeld and Cheney - along with other corrupt leaders who had been bribed or blackmailed into the scam - would have a pretext for doing the zionist mafia's bidding of supplying the servicemen of the US, UK, Australia, Italy, Spain, etc, as Israel's proxy army to fight its enemy neighbours. I.e., the offering up of national armed forces as a supply of private mercenaries, or cannon fodder, or uranium-ingesting leukemia and cancer cases waiting to happen. These sacrifices were primarily for the personal profit of the avaricious zionist mafia, along with the corrupt mafia-appointed government leaders who lapped up the few scraps and morsels tossed their way by their zionist handlers.

Rumsfeld directed this part of the operation from his Pentagon office, which was well clear of the renovated section where the hit was planned. In order to ensure that the plane would get to the Pentagon without meeting any resistance from the mighty US air defenses, Cheney directed wargames exercises from his bunker, including Vigilant Guardian, Vigilant Warrior, Northern Guardian, Northern Vigilance, and Tripod II. The first three were all to do with hijacked airplanes in NE US airspace. Some of these drills were live-fly exercises with remote-controlled planes, simulating the behaviour of hijacked airliners and coinciding with the alleged start of the "Arab hijacking(s)". In addition, the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), based in Chantilly, Virginia and intrinsically entangled with the CIA and the DoD, had scheduled an exercise starting at 09:00 which involved an aircraft hitting one of its buildings.

As late as the fall of 2003, the BTS website provided accurate flight records of AA Flights 11 and 77, and United Airlines Flights 93 and 175, the four that were allegedly hijacked by incredibly lucky "suicidal Moslems". Flights are regularly cancelled when bookings are low, and if a domestic flight is still shown in computer reservation systems within seven calendar days of the scheduled departure, the law and regulations direct that it must be reported and listed as "cancelled" in the BTS database. Sometimes a dearth of passengers results in cancellation more than seven calendar days prior to the scheduled departure, in which case the non-existent flight does not need to be reported and is not listed in the records for that day.

The latter was the situation for two of the four "hijacked flights" on September 11, 2001 - AA Flight 11 and AA Flight 77. Their non-appearance in the official BTS website is evidence that both flights had been cancelled more than a week prior to 9/11. The BTS records continued to report this for more than two years, until several months after independent 9/11 researchers had discovered the anomaly in the fall of 2003. In 2004 the website's on-time delivery flight records section was shut down. By April 2005, a doctored version of the records had reappeared, with Flights 11 and 77 now included on 9/11/2001.

In the six years up to August 31, 2001, American Airlines Flight 11 cancellations had been running at 4.13%, i.e. an average of about 15 days per annum. It had been unscheduled 14 times, 0.64% of days or 2.333 times per annum. AA Flight 77 had seen 1.99% of its scheduled (a week prior to schedule) flights cancelled, with 43 cancellations in 6 years. It had been unscheduled 27 times, a rate of 1.23% or an annual average of 4.5 days.

Both flights had very recent cancellations. The last time AA 11 was shown as "cancelled", i.e. it was in the database because the cancellation was not at least a week in advance, was the previous Tuesday, September 4, and prior to that it was cancelled for Monday August 27, 2001. AA Flight 77 last cancelled on Wednesday, September 5, 2001, and before that the Saturday August 18, 2001 flight was cancelled.

However, the best proof that the object which hit the Pentagon on the morning of 9/11 was not AA Flight 77 is provided by the fact that no video evidence supporting the official story was ever made public. The FBI immediately confiscated videos from a gas station and a hotel overlooking the Pentagon. In these days of the ubiquitous security camera, it is inconceivable that the defense HQ of the world's greatest military power did not have cameras trained on its west wing on the morning of 9/11. It was not until another six months or so that five frames of a pathetic amateurishly faked video were released by officials, purporting to be of the "Flight 77 impact".

The problem with the five frames of the "Pentagon security camera" record of the Flight 77 impact is that none of them show a Boeing 757 about to strike the Pentagon facade. The authorities admit that the security camera frame rate was 100 frames per second. Let us suppose the frame rate was only 10 frames per second, and that the impact speed of Flight 77 was as high as 780 fps or 530 mph, the figure stated by Civil Engineering Magazine, Feb 2003. In 1/10 second, the plane would travel 78 feet. Thus, there should exist a frame showing the nose of a 757-200 in AA colours within 78 feet of striking the Pentagon facade, i.e. within half a length of a Boeing 757-200. Given that the actual frame rate was likely to be considerably higher, the final pre-impact frame would probably have the nose well within 25 feet of the wall. In addition, the plane was supposed to be approaching at a 45 degree angle, so the gap from nose to wall and the slightly rotated aircraft length are foreshortened by cos[(angle of impact from the perpendicular) - (angle of camera slight inclination from parallel to facade)], a factor somewhat higher than 0.7071, which makes it even easier to fit a good view of Flight 77 in the frame The official story of Flight 77 has been comprehensively debunked before we even start to consider the fact that the alleged hijacker who flew the plane, Hani Hanjour, was a notoriously poor pilot who had been refused permission to hire a Cessna in August 2001 because his flying skills were so poor. Hanjour would not have suddenly developed the skills of a crack fighter pilot after a few weeks' flight simulator training, managing to steer a Boeing 757 a few feet above the Pentagon lawn at over 500 mph after descending 7000 feet in 150 seconds and making a sharp 270 degree turn pulling high Gs on his jet flying debut. There are several inconsistencies with the passenger manifest and the autopsy and their lack of Arabic names. There is the unlikelihood of the hijackers being able to turn off the aircraft transponder and persuade the pilot to hand over control of the plane, the coincidental exercises, and the fact that Mossad agents lived a few houses away from the "Arab hijackers". These problems, and many others, also apply to the other planes featuring in the official Ladenist hoax.

Unfortunately for Cheney, Rumsfeld and Bush, zionists had a much more ambitious scheme underway, to run in parallel with the Pentagon strike. For some thirty years, since its construction, the World Trade Center (WTC) complex had been owned by the Port Authorities of New York and New Jersey, who had full management rights. Then, in July 2001, seven weeks before 9/11, the Port Authorities inexplicably agreed to lease the buildings to Larry Silverstein (Silverstein Properties Inc,). Reports variously place the date of the transfer of management rights as July 24 or 26, 2001. Silverstein, a real estate magnate whose portfolio included the "Runway 69" Queens dance club linked to the heroin trade, money laundering and New York police corruption, was a former president of the United Jewish Appeal in New York. Also involved in the WTC deal was Frank Lowry, an Israeli businessman from Australia, and chairman and founder of Westfield Holdings. The lease was negotiated by Lewis Eisenberg, another prominent Israel supporter.

Silverstein agreed to pay a total of some $3.2 billion in leasing instalments over 99 years to the Port Authorities, who would remain the owners. However, Silverstein - now known as "Lucky Larry" - would take the rental income, and was the sole beneficiary of the buildings insurance policies. At the same time, he increased the insurance cover to $3.6 billion (the policy could pay out up to twice that, but only if it was judged that both Towers had been destroyed following two entirely separate incidents.) The initial payment to the Port Authorities was a tiny fraction of $3.2 billion, to be followed by smaller annual fees. Silverstein, backed by New York investor Lloyd Goldman and former entertainment industry distributor Joseph Cayre, had to put up a mere $125 million in equity for the office portion of the WTC lease in July 2001.

The probability of a transfer of management rights at the WTC and signing of a new lease, whereby the new management is the beneficiary of the insurance (which they increased!), within 7 weeks of the destruction of the WTC complex can be conservatively calculated from the ratio 7 weeks divided by the duration of the previous ownership. Both of the Twin Towers had been completed by 1972, so 7 weeks divided by 29 years equals a 1 in 215 chance.

Another stroke of fortune for "Lucky Larry" was that he had regularly been taking breakfast at the elegant Windows on the World restaurant at the top of the North Tower. On the morning of 9/11 by an amazing coincidence, his wife had reminded him that he had a "doctor's appointment"; consequently, the tycoon eluded the tragic fate of more than 2,000 WTC workers and hundreds of emergency responders.

Suppose a middle-aged lady had been happily married for 29 years, the first husband had died, and husband number two took out a massive insurance policy on her life. Seven weeks later, the lady dies in mysterious circumstances in an accident that would not be fatal unless the laws of physics, chemistry and biology were revised - e.g., a small piece of cardboard falls on her head from a height of one foot. Any detective worth their salt should be suspicious, to say the least. The relevance of the "less than lethal with invariant scientific and natural law" part of this analogy to the 9/11 destruction of the WTC will become apparent when we examine how the plane crashes and fires could not possibly have caused global collapse of a single skyscraper, let alone the three towers 1WTC, 2WTC and 7WTC, and each of them in the manner of a controlled demolition.

A day before the 9/11 attacks - the same day Rumsfeld announced that $2.3 trillion had gone missing at the Pentagon - the Washington Times ran an article on its front page in which the Army's School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS) was quoted describing Israel's intelligence service Mossad as: "Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act".

Dov Zakheim had access to technology for the remote control of aircraft through his tenure at SPC; he had access to Boeings through a lease deal he arranged whilst at the Pentagon. The second plane to hit the WTC - UA Flight 175 which hit the South Tower 2WTC - had to be very close to the genuine article, as the media would then have plenty of cameras in place. Flight 175 was shown in the BTS records, and did actually hit the South Tower. In this case, SPC technology was employed to take control of the Boeing 767 after it had got into cruising mode.

For the plane which hit the North Tower, it was not necessary to take over a plane in flight. One of Zakheim's Boeings, pre-packed with explosives, was used as a dummy. The official story had to claim this as an "Arab-hijacked passenger plane", which required a fairly regular flight that happened to be unscheduled on 9/11. Ideally, this flight would also depart from Boston for LA (as did Flight 175). Hence, AA Flight 11 was selected. It was important that at least one WTC hit was successful out of the three commissioned, and a retro-fitted model complete with all necessary software patches was their best chance. With Flight 175, there was a slight risk that the operators might not have been able to take control, the fireball might have been less spectacular, and the steering could have been less precise. The slight errors apparent in the steering actually helped the effect of the fireball, although gave less credence to the "fire collapse" theory. From their command post in 7WTC, the operators noticed that the South Tower fires were going out first; thus it was necessary to initiate the demolition after only 56 minutes.

The original plan was to have both Twin Towers collapse at around 10:15, allow the operators sufficient time to exit 7WTC, and then have Flight 93 hit 7WTC at around 10:30. The third crash would provide the pretext for the planned 7WTC collapse, which was necessary in order to eliminate evidence of the remote-control transmitters for controlling Flights 11, 175, and 93, and detonating charges in each of the Twin Towers. At 9:36, Flight 93 had filed a new flight plan to arrive in Washington at 10:28. Unfortunately for the zionists, the US air defenses could not be delayed indefinitely. Moreover, UA Flight 93 was part of the zionist cabal's three-plane false-flag insurance scam, rather than Rumsfeld's Pentagate plan. The zionists' third plane, UA93, was shot down over Shanksville at 10:06. They still had to demolish 7WTC, but without a "suicide piloted passenger plane" to hand. Hence, the official story was forced to assert that the global collapse of 7WTC was solely as a result of "fires".

A detailed analysis of the fires in 1WTC proves how the fire collapse theorist must either hope that no one bothers to do the calculations, or must postulate a version of reality which features variable physical and natural law (which is precisely what the Holocaustian must do for Poland in 1944). 1WTC, which was hit by an aircraft, and where fires burned for 102 minutes before global collapse occurred, offers the best hope for the fire collapse theorist who tries to pose as a "scientist".

Throughout the 100-year history of steel framed high-rise buildings and skyscrapers up to September 10, 2001, there had never been even a single incidence of fire-induced collapse in the US. According to Ronald Hamburger in the Stanford Report, Dec 3, 2001, 7WTC was the "first major structure in the U.S. to collapse because of fire". A report on multiple fatality fires, 1994-1996, has no mention of "collapse". And National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Building and Fire Research Laboratory (BFRL), Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster reports, "The WTC Towers and WTC 7 are the only known cases of total structural collapse in high-rise buildings where fires played a significant role." The worldwide statistics for high-rise buildings since 1970 include only 17 cases of fire-induced collapse, two of these being structural steel buildings, and none in the US. Yet on September 11, 2001, three separate skyscrapers collapsed in the US, where building codes are more stringent than in poorer nations.

Being generous to the government-backed fire-collapse theory - just before a random event occurs the rate of occurrence will tend below the mean; after the event it will tend above the mean. Let's suppose 3 collapses in every 100 years is the average fire-induced collapse rate to be expected for steel framed high-rise buildings in the US (and the fact that the rate remained at zero for so long suggests that this is an overestimate). So the rate is one day every 33.333 years = 1 day every 12,175 days. Hence, the probability for one such collapse to occur on any specified day is 1 in 12,175, and the probability for three collapses is 1 in 12,175 cubed = 1 in 1.805 trillion.

For a compartment fire, an allowance must be made for incomplete combustion in places, which will reduce the total heat liberated for a given mass of fuel. In the case of the WTC fires, both sides of the debate included absurdities. Some zionist press articles claimed that "jet fuel fires melted the steel"; some sceptics argued that "oxygen-starved" hydrocarbon fires in buildings could never burn at temperatures higher than about 500 C.

Conditions will range from stoichiometric near the vent side of a flame to fuel rich at the smoke side. Let us suppose a linear distribution of oxygen reactant over the range stoichiometric (equivalence ratio or "phi" = 1) to half that mass of oxygen per unit of fuel (phi = 2), ignoring all cases where the fires are even more oxygen starved. [Please refer to "Mathematics of the WTC Fires" sections of http://www.takeourworldback.com/911/ for full details.] From the integral of the function, we have a mean equivalence ratio close to phi = 1.386 (the natural log of 4). Calculation of the thermochemical equations for wood (a cellulose-lignin mix) and kerosene (dodecane) over this linear range of oxygen reactant, and averaging, provides a figure of 67 to 68% as the mean efficiency of such a fire. The analysis computed a calorific value of some 11.43 kJ/g for wood, down from the stoichiometric value of 16.74 kJ/g from the equation used:

0.8C6H10O5 + 0.2C18H24O11 + 8.5O2 + 31.976N2 ===> 8.4CO2 + 6.4H2O + 31.976N2 + 3563.2 kJ

and 29.7 kJ/g for dodecane, compared to 44.14 kJ/g in complete combustion from:

C12H26 + 18.5O2 + 69.595N2 ===> 12CO2 + 13H2O + 69.595N2 + 7518.26 kJ

These thermochemical equations are both for phi = 1. Apart from setting phi = 2 as the maximum equivalence ratio, another assumption here is that as oxygen is removed from the reactants, CO2 and H2O products decrease in the proportion 59:41. CO is substituted for lost CO2 product, and H2 for lost H2O. The combustion efficiency value (Eff) of around 68% is found to derive from the heat released per unit of oxygen according to:

Eff = 1 - 4.1575 / Hox

where Hox is the maximum heat released per unit of oxygen (kJ/g) consumed for the particular fuel, in complete combustion. A typical value is 13.1 kJ/g. Adjustments to the assumption of a 59:41 split make little difference to the calculated combustion efficiency.

The 11.43 kJ/g for wood compares favourably with the 10.75 kJ/g assumed by Kawagoe and others such as Magnusson and Thelandersson as the net effective heat of combustion of wood in fully developed compartment fires.

Selecting a floor assumed to have the severest fires, we then take a worst case scenario for that particular floor. For the maximum possible energy density, we will suppose that the mass burning rate coincidentally just happened to be such that the entire floor's combustibles including aircraft fittings were consumed over 102 minutes, the fire duration from impact until collapse. We also suppose that this floor received an above average share of jet fuel, which would have been dispersed over several floors. The heat released from the jet fuel is also counted, although the pool fire would have burnt up within a few minutes.

A typical aircraft contains 3,300 to 8,400 kg of combustibles, according to the FAA. We shall suppose 7,000 kg over two floors, with 3,500 kg on the model's worst-affected floor.

FEMA's report quotes Culver (1977) stating that typical office-type occupancies contain fuel loads (described in terms of the equivalent weight of wood) of 4 to 12 pounds per square foot, with the mean slightly less than 8. However, NIST's reports of June and October 2004 by S. Shyam Sunder state that the typical (WTC) floor contained an average of 4 psf of combustible materials.

The fuel load in the core area was relatively light, with much of this zone taken up by service shafts. The remaining space between shafts would have contained a limited fuel load, with the great majority of combustible material such as desks and workstations being outside the core. Let's suppose there was on average 7 psf or 34.18 kg/m^2 (close to Culver's geometric mean) outside the core, and 2 psf or 9.765 kg/m^2 within it. The core area was 137' x 87' out of 208' x 208', or 1,107 m^2 out of 4,019 m^2, leaving 2,912 m^2 as the non-core area. However, above the floor 78 sky lobby, some 40% of the core space is taken up by elevator shafts, stairwells, etc. (It was about 50% in the middle section and 60% below floor 44; express elevator shafts stopped at each sky lobby.) So the core space on the upper floors of the fire zone was effectively 0.6 * 1,107, i.e. about 664 m^2. Hence, the combustibles per floor, excluding aircraft debris, are 34.18 * 2,912 + 9.765 * 664 = 106,016 kg = 116.9 tons, expressed in terms of the equivalent weight of wood.

Averaging over the whole floor including core and shafts space, this works out around 5.4 psf which is still above NIST's assumed 4 psf average for a typical WTC floor. The NIST figure may well represent the actual weight of combustibles, and so would be less than the equivalent weight of wood, given that some combustibles have a higher calorific value. Other substances such as plastics would exhibit little difference in the heat released per unit of oxygen consumed. Since the combustion inefficiency factor associated with fuel rich fires derives from the calorific value of the oxygen rather than the fuel, our inefficiency factor calculated above at around 0.68 is applicable to a mix of various fuels.

FEMA's report suggests (for WTC 2) 3,000 gallons as a reasonable assumption for the jet fuel initially consumed in fireballs, leaving 7,000 gallons. It assumes about half of this flowed away, either down elevator shafts or out of the building, with approximately 4,000 gallons remaining on the impact floors. It also says, "Barring additional information, it is reasonable to assume that an approximately similar amount of jet fuel was consumed by fireballs as the aircraft struck WTC 1".

We have no quibbles with these assumptions, and will take their figure of 4,000 gallons dispersed on the impact floors, which would have burned as a pool fire. In the model it was supposed that the total area of the pool fire, unevenly distributed over several floors, was 2,067 m^2. Given that the mass burning rate for free burning pool fires is on the order of 50 grams per square metre per second, the minimum burn time assuming an unlimited oxygen supply is given by:

mass of fuel {Kg} / (0.05 * pool fire area {m^2}) = t {secs}

Jet fuel is around 3.1 kg per gallon, and 3.1 x 4,000 = 12,400 kg of fuel. So we have:

12,400 / (0.05 * 2067) = 120 seconds to burn up (which is why 2067 m^2 was selected). As the oxygen is consumed, the mass burning rate is limited to that set by the area and height of the vents. It was found that for the 106,016 kg (116.9 tons) of office combustibles and 3,500 kg of aircraft combustibles to be consumed over 102 minutes (109,516 / 6,120 = 17.9 kg/s mass burning rate), and given the vent area, the effective height of the vent had to be slightly greater than one 10-foot storey (excluding 2-foot floor-ceiling area). I.e., at the impact area some floor space was taken out which raises the height of the two-layer zone. Further away, a single floor is a two-layer zone of cooler air at the bottom and smoke and hot gases at the top.

12,400 kg of aviation fuel burning in 120 seconds is a mass burning rate of 103 kg/s, which is nearly six times greater than the rate for the whole floor's combustibles to burn over 102 minutes. A six-storey fire compartment model could only sustain about half of this rate (air throughput per floor relates to the square root of the effective vent height). So the fuel burning time would be somewhat more than two minutes, but not more than a few minutes. Nevertheless, we shall add the energy released by the kerosene to that of the other combustibles, and include this over the whole 102 minutes which will provide the best prospects for a fire-induced global collapse ensuing at the end of that period.

If the fuel is unevenly distributed over several floors, a distribution might, for example, have consisted of areas of 100, 300, 400, 500,and 767 square metres. We shall take the 767 m^2 for the model's worst affected floor, which gives 12,400 * 767 / 2,067 = 4,601 kg or 1,484 gallons of kerosene. This floor is also assumed to have 106,016 kg of office combustibles, and 3,500 kg of aircraft combustibles, totalling 109,516 kg expressed in terms of the equivalent weight of wood.

Allowing for combustion inefficiencies, the effective calorific value of the kerosene was some 29.7 MJ/kg, with 11.4 MJ/kg for the wood.

1484 * 3.1 kg/gallon * 29.7 MJ/kg = 1.37 * 10^11 J (kerosene)

+ 109516 * 11.4 = 1.25 * 10^12 J (other combustibles, wood equivalent)

This gives a total of 1.39 * 10^12 J for the worst floor, including heat which flowed out of the building. Of the total, some 60% - i.e. 8.34 * 10^11 J - is retained in the building, with the building absorbing the greatest proportion when cold.

For this worst case storey, the kerosene and aircraft combustibles are added to the total floor area excluding shafts. The total floor area comprised the non-core of 31,345 ft^2 and the 60% of 11,919 ft^2 core space - i.e. 7,151 ft^2, to give a total area excluding shafts of 38,496 ft^2 or 3,576 m^2. With the kerosene yielding the equivalent of 12,018 kg of wood, 12018 kg / 3576 m^2 is an extra 3.361 kg/m^2 or 0.688 psf. 3,500 kg of aircraft combustibles adds 0.979 kg/m^2 or 0.2 psf. So we have:

Non-core combustibles = 7 + 0.688 + 0.2 = 7.888 psf = 40.8 MJ/ft^2

Core combustibles = 2 + 0.688 + 0.2 = 2.888 psf = 14.93 MJ/ft^2

These figures were the basis of computations involving summing the radiant heat contributions from each square foot/metre of floor space, as viewed at some specified point on the floor. Specifications of structural steel members was determined from information in the public domain. Each point source contribution computed a radiation view factor and proportion of the heat released from combustibles at that point that would be absorbed by a given member. Working in square metres did not greatly affect the results. With a nearly tenfold difference in computation time for a floor, the final set of results worked in square metres of floor space. The final temperatures at 102 minutes were predicted for each core column and other members for various proportions of fire resistive coating (FRC) remaining or assumed stripped off.

The above core density of 14.93 MJ/ft^2 was based on lowering the area from 11,919 to 7,151 ft^2 after allowing for 40% of area being taken up by shafts. Rather than determine which points were taken up by shafts, it was easier to multiply the energy density by 0.6 and plot all points. The model pretends the shafts do not exist to shield the columns, thereby exaggerating absorption. The non-core released 1.279 * 10^12 J, with a corresponding 1.068 * 10^11 J from the core. In metric, the total points plotted were x and y coordinates 0.5 to 62.5 which is 63^2 = 3,969 m^2. There were 1,134 core points and 2,835 office area points. Thus, the core energy density came to 94.2 MJ/m^2, and the non-core was 451 MJ/m^2.

It was assumed that 40% of the energy flowed out of the building. With a mean adiabatic flame temperature of 1,488 C after allowing for 68% combustion efficiency with conditions ranging from stoichiometric to fuel rich, actual flame temperatures averaging 1,000 C after transmitting heat to surroundings, an exiting gases temperature of 669 C, and an average hot gases upper layer temperature of 835 C, the total heat transmitted to the building was 6.84 MJ/kg of wood equivalent, with another 4.56 MJ/kg vented to the exterior. Of the heat transmitted to the building, 4.16 MJ/kg was from the flames and 2.68 MJ/kg from hot gas or smoke upper layer. So the program multiplied the above energy density figures by 0.6, which took account of contributions from the flames and smoke layer.

For the full results for each core column and accompanying description, see http://www.takeourworldback.com/911/911fires4.htm.

The ongoing research at present suggests that the only real vulnerability would have been with the trusses on two floors that were subject to the onslaught of impacting debris. In any case, the central area of one floor, up to the core, was probably taken out by the initial impact. The effect of the fires, if causing local partial floor collapse, would have been small compared to the impact damage. This analysis (confirmed by the NIST study) found that it would be necessary to totally remove four or five floors - depending on core column temperatures - before there would be any possibility of global instability. A partial failure of trusses on two floors and partial local floor collapse would not bring down the building.

The original demand : capacity ratios were around 0.4 to 0.5 for the core columns, and 0.17 to 0.2 for the perimeter columns. Most core columns were aligned with the webs running north-south, so the "Flight 11" debris approaching from the north of 1WTC would have impacted with one side of a flange. The web and other flange would have been essentially in the "shadow" of the exposed flange, hence protected. Core column 704, one of the weakest and with the web running east-west, might have failed on the model's worst case floor, if flying debris had stripped all FRC from a side of its web, and if the fire had raged as per the worst case scenario detailed above. However, the other columns would have remained below 550 C and retained spare capacity even if debris stripped FRC from the debris-exposed side. In order to initiate collapse of even a single floor, failure of a number of additional columns would be required - a failure which would not have occurred.

2WTC collapsed in only 56 minutes; therefore heat absorbed by members would have been 55% of the 1WTC absorption for a given mass burning rate. The 2WTC fires were not observed to be 82% more severe than in 1WTC. As for 7WTC, it was never hit by a plane, and the FRC would have remained intact. The idea that fire could lead to this building collapsing as if in a controlled demolition is as ludicrous as the idea that the face of Elvis Presley would appear in a Danish pastry.

Hence, the probability of 1 in 12,175 against each (of three) high-rise collapses will be found to be valid; a probability of 1 in 1.805 trillion.

Israel's guilt in the WTC demolition was also confirmed by the arrest of the "dancing Israelis" for "puzzling behaviour", the Odigo warning to 7,000 Jews to stay away from work that day, and the sighting of Mohammed Atta on Jack Abramoff's gambling boat.

Five Israelis had been observed photographing or videoing pictures of themselves with the WTC burning in the background. They were jumping for joy in Liberty State Park, celebrating with high fives in a Jersey City parking lot, and celebrating on a roof in Weehawken. Witnesses said that they appeared happy rather than shocked - smiling, laughing, joking, and shouting in what was interpreted as cries of joy and mockery as the Towers burnt and collapsed.

The five - Sivan Kurzberg (the driver), Paul Kurzberg (his brother), Yaron Shmuel, Oded Ellner, and Omer Marmari - had been travelling in a white, signwritten 2000 Chevrolet van with New Jersey plates. One passenger was found to have $4,700 in cash hidden in his sock, another carried two foreign passports, and a box cutter was found in the van. Maps were found with certain places highlighted, and said to link the Israelis to the WTC plot. Dogs reacted as if traces of explosives were in the van, although nothing was found; it had probably already gone up in smoke.

Ostensibly, the Israelis worked for a Weehawken moving company, Urban Moving Systems, with offices on West 18th Street in Weehawken and on West 50th Street in Manhattan, and owned by Dominik Otto Suter, another Israeli. Paul Kurzberg refused to take a lie detector test for ten weeks, and then failed it. It was later confirmed that the FBI had concluded that several or most of the men were Mossad operatives and the moving company a Mossad front.

The five were arrested about 8 hours after the 9/11 attacks, held in Brooklyn for more than two months, and then quietly released and allowed to go back to Israel. Suter fled for Israel a few days after the attacks and arrests, leaving dozens of customers' property lying around in the warehouse and cell phones in the office.

Two hours prior to the WTC attacks, two employees of Odigo, an Israeli instant-messaging service, received text messages at their research, development and international sales office in Herzliya, Israel, warning of an attack on the World Trade Center. The Odigo service included a feature called "People Finder", allowing users to seek and contact others based on interests or demographics. Odigo admitted that the attack warnings could have been broadcast to other users, too. Odigo also had a New York office, four blocks from the WTC. In May 2002, Odigo was acquired by Comverse, which incidentally is the Israeli parent company of Verint Systems, which handled video security for the London Underground at the time of the 7/7 bombings.

Employees of Goldman Sachs, the Jewish investment banking firm with headquarters in Lower Manhattan close to the former WTC site, were probably warned of a terrorist attack even earlier than those on the Odigo buddy list. The Sept 14, 2001 edition of Counterpunch reported "Counterpunch has also learned that an internal memo was sent around Goldman Sachs in Tokyo on September 10 advising all employees of a possible terrorist attack. It recommended all employees to avoid any American Government buildings". It is unlikely that Tokyo employees got a warning on the previous day (when New York local time, at 14 hours behind, was probably within a few hours of midnight September 9th/10th), but New York-based Goldman Sachs workers did not receive advance warning.

Clearly, the above Mossad agents - who were held in solitary confinement for weeks - had been involved in planting explosives or thermite in the WTC, and had sent warning text messages to a list of Jews to make sure they did not turn up for work that day. Apart from WTC workers, the list included a couple of Odigo employees in Israel. For corroboration of this, we can consider the occupancy of the Towers at the time of the attacks.

According to NIST, 15,400 escaped and 2,159 were killed in the WTC, which is a total occupancy of 17,559 at the time of the attacks. Let us suppose as many as half arrive after 8:46, which is rather high considering these workers in what were some of the world's most prestigious offices were high-fliers rather than the type who would amble in in mid-morning. The normal daily occupancy of both Towers was more than 50,000. So we have:

(more than 25,000) - 17,559 = more than 7,441

...which is certainly consistent with internet reports of 4,000 Jews being warned not to turn up for work that day. The number who were either on the Odigo buddy list or received verbal warnings from those who were, when we include offices such as Goldman Sachs, was probably well over 4,000.

Less than a week before the 9/11 attacks, Mohammed Atta and several others allegedly from his Muslim terrorist group visited a gambling boat run by Jack Abramoff, a Jewish Washington lobbyist who pleaded guilty to charges of conspiracy, fraud and tax evasion in January 2006. Konstantinos "Gus" Boulis, a Greek immigrant, launched the SunCruz Casinos business offering gambling "cruises to nowhere", taking its clients to international waters to escape gambling laws. In February 2001, Boulis was shot to death, five months after selling his SunCruz fleet of gambling boats to Jack Abramoff and partners. Boulis had maintained that the $23 million payment was never made. SunCruz employees said they recognised some of the men suspected of being in the 9/11 attack as customers on a ship that sailed from Madeira Beach on Florida's west coast. One name on a passenger list from a September 5 cruise matched that of one on the FBI's terrorist list, with a cash advance taken out on his credit card. Another man on a Port Canaveral ship was also recognised as one of the listed terrorists. Photos, documents and videos were turned over to the FBI.

Although half of the suicide 9/11 terrorists were found alive and well within weeks of the atrocities, these may have been victims of identity theft. It was necessary for the zionist mafia to kill the other patsies after they had outlived their usefulness. Abramoff may have a history of arranging assassinations, so a connection to the "hijackers" would be valuable. If Atta and Co had been 'groomed' by being encouraged to go on regular gambling cruises, they could have been lured on a private gambling trip around September 11 - "You're going to win big-time" - and dumped miles out to sea in the Gulf of Mexico.

After 9/11, the zionist mafia and Bush Administration had a phony pretext for the attacking and looting of nations that were deemed worthwhile prey. The CIA was anxious to invade Afghanistan in order to get back into the opium trade, which had been lucrative for them until the Taliban curtailed it. The Bushes and partners hoped to profit from Iraq's oil wealth, from looting its Oil-for-Food fund, and from reconstruction contracts. Israel wanted to see its Arab neighbours neutered, and maybe even turned into satellite colonies such as the US, UK and Germany. Their immediate interest was Iraq, not Afghanistan. The Mossad's identity theft operations had provided about nine names as suspected hijackers with another nine being groomed on Abramoff's gambling boats. The Bush family had business links with the bin Ladens, and Osama was selected as the arch-villain since he had ailing kidneys and was not expected to survive long. But it was easier to link Osama with Afghanistan than Iraq.

For the criminals, wars were great, since they provided a form of wealth transfer from the many to the few. The US taxpayer might stump up hundreds of billions of dollars to prosecute a war, and yet the rewards would not amount to much more than $9 billion or so from an Oil-for-Food fund and a few treasures from museums. Overall, it is a negative-sum game. But those making the profits are not those who bear the losses. The financial expenditure is from public funds seized from the taxpayer, and the blood price is borne by innocent servicemen who have been told they are serving their nation. The profits go straight into the private accounts of the war criminals. They have not needed to lay out a cent of their own money, which equates to an infinite rate of return; neither have they or any of their children had to pay any blood price.

The Bush Administration and other poodles of Israel were faced with problems in supplying a suitable pretext for invading Iraq. They tried to morph Osama into Osama-Saddam, but this was not too successful. The absurd "WMD" claims were going to take some time. This approach required the forging of documents about purchase of yellowcake from Niger, dodgy dossiers including excerpts cut-and-pasted from a student's obsolete thesis on the internet and passed off as current intelligence information, and claims that weather balloon inflators were really "mobile biological weapons laboratories".

Israel decided to put pressure on the US to speed up its Iraq attack; the kingpins were not prepared to wait for four or five years. American Airlines Flight 587 crashed shortly after take-off in Belle Harbor, New York on November 12, 2001. Witnesses reported two explosions, and after the second, larger explosion, the vertical stabiliser cleanly broke away at the connection to the fuselage as an unmarked, complete unit. Then the engines were severed. The official story claimed "wake turbulence" as the cause. After all, fires had suddenly gained the power to bring down skyscrapers of structural steel treated with Cafco Blaze-Shield or Monokote fire resistive coating, where the perimeter columns had a demand : capacity ratio of 0.17 to 0.2 with a corresponding 0.4 to 0.5 for the core columns. Maybe in this brave new reality, winds might conceivably have attained the power to blow aircraft apart!

In the following months, the US and UK governments worked overtime trying to concoct an excuse to invade Iraq. After the invasion, when the WMDs were nowhere to be found, there were suggestions that Saddam had "hidden them to avoid getting into really deep trouble", or had sent them off to Syria. As the WMD claims fell apart, the warmongers had to claim that the invasion - i.e. the killing and maiming of tens of thousands of Iraqis, thousands of the invaders' troops, the destruction of Iraq's infrastructure, and the dumping of radioactive waste on its land to be dispersed to a lesser extent around the globe - was carried out in order to "liberate", and "bring democracy to", the Iraqi people. The only 'crime' they could even hope to pin on Saddam was his signing of death warrants for 148 people linked to an assassination attempt on him in 1982. George W Bush personally signed more than 150 death warrants during his tenure as Governor of Texas, so by the previous logic, the US should invade itself to remove Bush (one case where the zionist version of events leads to a far from totally undesirable conclusion) The UK's 'leader', Tony Blair, had always been a gung-ho supporter of the US-led invasion of Iraq. The 4 million pounds he received (laundered by purchase of a London house and two Bristol flats) and blackmail involving pictures of Cherie Blair "having her toxins cleaned out" by Carole Caplin, and possibly of Tony in a compromising position with Peter Mandelson, saw to that. But the zionists wanted to make sure that Australia would toe the line, too...

The Mossad's planting and detonation of a micro nuke in Bali on October 12, 2002, killing 202 and injuring 209, provided yet another opportunity for them to practise their skills. Two small bombs were exploded at the same time, in order to cultivate the myth of the deadly professional "al Qaeda Muslim terrorists" whose trademark was synchronised attacks of great ferocity. The highly lethal micro nuke was targeted at the Sari Club, frequented by Australians, of whom some 89 were killed. There were no Israeli victims.

Evidence that this was a micro nuke is best observed from the damage done to concrete reinforcing bars (rebars) over 50 feet (15 metres) from Ground Zero. A rebar of the old US grade 40 has a minimum yield strength of 40,000 pounds per square inch (psi), or grade 60 is 60,000 psi minimum. The concrete itself is of course weaker than the composite structure, and typical compressive strengths for concrete range from 3,000 to 5,000 psi. A TNT detonation is capable of producing some 4,000 psi of overpressure in very close proximity; however, this greatly attenuates with distance. At a range of one metre, for instance, the peak overpressure from 1 kg of TNT equivalent is around 100 psi, and the dynamic pressure much less.

In order to get the same blast effect at a greater distance, it is necessary to raise the mass of TNT equivalent by a factor equal to the cube of the ratio of the distances. So to achieve even a "mere" 100 psi at a 15 metre range, the bomber would require 15 cubed = 3,375 kg of TNT equivalent. Typical relative effectiveness factors range from 0.5 to 2, and the densities of explosives are less than 2,000 kg/m^3. Even at the most optimistic estimate, a solid cubic metre of explosives would produce little more than 100 psi at 15 metres.

Conventional explosives do not reduce concrete to dust and sand at a range of 50 feet and more. There are also photographs of a mushroom cloud and reports of a "blinding white flash" at Bali. After these attacks of 2002, Australia's John Howard had an additional pretext to support the "war on terror" and the vaguely-linked war on Iraq.

After the Iraq war was in progress (and even claimed to be almost over), there were a number of other Mossad hits, with the relevant satellite state government attempting to claim bombings as the work of an appropriate scapegoat deemed acceptable to both parties. The favourite choice was "al Qaeda" or "Muslim suicide bombers".

The Madrid train bombings of March 11, 2004 ("3/11"), was another Israeli black op. With ten coordinated bombs on four trains, at least 191 were killed and up to 2,050 wounded. The authorities tried to concoct a hoax about "bombs in rucksacks"; evidence from the blast damage showed that this was a typical Mossad multiple train bombs operation (to be repeated in London around sixteen months later).

Debris from the floor of the carriages was embedded in the ceilings. The military-grade high-order explosives - in greater quantity than could be carried in rucksacks by ten bearded Muslim gentlemen - were fitted to the bottom of the carriages the previous night, as the trains were in the overnight rail yards. A major intelligence service - with decades of experience in deception, computer hacking skills, and access to diplomatic privileges - could have gained access to these yards, and also obtained detailed information on rolling stock movements from the computer network. A group of angry Muslims or home-grown separatists could not have obtained the necessary security clearance, or smuggled the explosives in without detection.

Officially, the bombers were originally supposed to be "ETA", and then "al Qaeda". In March 2006 it was officially admitted that there was no evidence whatsoever of an al Qaeda link. Given that Israel's Mossad and al Qaeda are one and the same thing, that is not literally true, but at least the deceivers were forced to admit that their fake al Qaeda story had fallen apart.

The key to this is in the timing. At first sight, Israel did not appear to have a motive to target Spain. PM Jose Maria Aznar had carried out the zionist mafia's orders, after a secret deal had been struck at the Azores summit of March 2003. Ostensibly, the summit was a last-minute attempt to agree a new UN resolution in order to avert war over the crisis of Iraq's "WMDs"; in actuality it was about how much would be paid into whose secret accounts and how much of their military would be offered up as Israel's proxy army. Spain had contributed some 1300 soldiers for the invasion of Iraq.

March 11, 2004 was exactly 30 months after the 9/11 attacks. Moreover, it was 912 days after 9/11; i.e., there were 911 intervening days between the two dates. With the US elections due later that year, Israel had decided to conduct an experiment in order to test the effect of terror attacks on an incumbent's popularity. Just three days after 3/11, Spain was due to hold elections. If Aznar had been re-elected, then the US would have seen another attack in the fall in an attempt to boost Bush's poll ratings. Aznar deserved to be thrown out of office for his betrayal of the Spanish people in signing up to Israel's war on Iraq, but the Madrid bombings were not his fault. In the event, Aznar lost the election, and so the US was spared another attack for the time being.

Zionists have a fixation with numerology; 3/11 and its 911 intervening days was the obvious choice for the timing of the experiment. The location of 3/11 was determined by the timing of Spain's election. The Bali 2002 micro nuke operation was exactly one year, one month and one day after 9/11. Subsequent zionist attacks included Jordan (November 9, 2005 which is 9/11 in Israeli and European calendars), and Sharm al-Sheikh (July 23, 2005 which is 1,411 days after 9/11). The second half of 2006 includes the five-year anniversary of 9/11 and December 5 which will be 1,911 days after 9/11 (or December 6 for 1,911 intervening days). So if any countries are planning elections within a few days of these dates, they would be well advised to postpone them.

Zionists wanted to see Bush re-elected in the 2004 US presidential election.

Of course, the idea that a dry drunk with an inane fascination for watching small animals explode, and lacking either a reasonable intellect or even the basic motor skills to swallow a pretzel or ride a tricycle or bicycle, is actually the architect of US foreign policy is akin to supposing that data manipulation within a computer is carried out not by the CPU, but by a tiny nut within the assembly. Israel gives its orders to Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice and Co via the neocon intermediaries.

There were parallels between the US election and the UK general election of May 2005. Both had suitable zionist puppets to play the role of a "leader", in reality nothing more than a front for Israel. The opposition candidates were both Jews who had changed their name - John Kerry (Kohn) and Michael Howard (Hecht). Both of these opposition candidates were desperately trying their level best to lose. Another little scam for the US elections was to concoct a video purporting to be of Osama bin Laden - who had died at least two years ago - in the hope that this might frighten some into voting for Bush as the man who would "protect" them.

In the UK election the zionists' plan worked, and Blair was re-elected. But Dubya was so unpopular and so incompetent that Kerry's kid gloves strategy and the Osama hoax would not have prevented Kerry from winning. Hence, it was necessary to fiddle the results by a few additional percentage points. The various chicanery included electronic voting machines, such as the Diebold optical scanner machines, with results sent to a central tabulator that was just a Windows-based PC. Walden O'Dell, Chief Executive of Diebold, had written to 100 wealthy Republican supporters in a fund-raising exercise: "I am committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year". Either the voting machines had secretly been programmed to bias the results by several points in favour of Bush, or hackers manipulated data in the central tabulators.

There were significant discrepancies between exit polls, which predicted a win for Kerry, and the official results. Where a paper trail existed, the divergence between exit polls and results was within the expected statistical margin of error. In contrast, results from the voting machines had consistently swung towards Bush. The National Election Data Archive demonstrated that the odds of these discrepancies occurring due to chance ranged from 1 in 17,800 down to 1 in 867,205,500. Dr Stephen Freeman of the University of Pennsylvania calculated the odds at 250 million to one against for just three of the major swing states - Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania - to swing as far as they did from their exit polls. Other tricks included the barring of foreign observers, phony letters telling people they could not vote, and obstruction of minority groups from voting. Bizarre consequences included instances where there were more votes cast than voters. Historically, the incumbent had never managed a last-minute surge.

The machine-induced swing in Ohio was sufficient for Bush to steal the election. As if all was normal, the US then had the audacity to continue lecturing other countries about holding free and fair elections, and of the importance of "democracy" (one of the pretexts for the invasion of Iraq).

With Bush and Blair both safely re-elected and working to hasten the move to a global dictatorship, the second half of 2005 featured an above average number of Israeli false-flag terror operations. The zionist cabal's protection racket continued to operate in similar vein to that of previous decades, albeit now flushed with success over its nuclear-armed subs, accomplishment of Silverstein and the Mossad's billion-dollar WTC demolition insurance fraud, Zakheim's trillion-dollar Pentagon embezzlement, and the neocons' recruiting of puppet states' armed forces as Israel's proxy army for the war on Iraq. This super-mafia was baying at the scent of the imminent despotism.

In general, terror attacks - to be blamed on some suitable scapegoat that would provide a pretext for stripping the people of their human rights and hard-won freedoms - were conducive to the zionist mafia's programme for world dictatorship. Specifically, when a nation did something to displease its government's mafia masters, it would be punished with a terror attack. The nation's political leadership would be racked with guilt, feeling partly responsible for the casualties, but would be forced to cover up the mafia's crimes by going along with the cover story - e.g. of "Muslim suicide bombers", or "ETA", or "Chechen insurgents", etc.

July, 7 2005 (the "7/7 attacks") was the date of the UK's worst terrorist atrocity since Pan Am 103 exploded in the skies over Lockerbie, Scotland, in December 1988. A bomb in each of three London Underground trains and another on a London bus left 56 dead and about 700 injured.

British Gas had recently discovered significant offshore gas fields in Palestinian Authority areas off the Gaza coast. Israel did not express any interest in this gas, even though gas from Egypt was more expensive. Ariel Sharon preferred to deal with Egypt for political reasons, fearing that a $150+ million annual cash flow to the Palestinians would be used to bankroll "terrorism" - i.e. resistance to the occupation - against Israel.

On June 30, Israeli and Egyptian officials signed a $2.5 billion deal for the sale of Egyptian natural gas to Israel over the next 15 years, with options for a further 5 years. Israel then found out that Egypt and British Gas had struck a secret deal behind her back, whereby Palestinian gas would be sold to Egypt. Effectively, Israel would be purchasing from Palestine after all, and having to pay a premium price into the bargain. Hence, the zionist mafia decided to whack Britain and Egypt. A series of bombings in Sharm al-Sheikh killed 88 and wounded over 150 - Egypt's deadliest terror attack in history. Most casualties were Egyptians. 11 Britons died, and an Israeli Arab. There were no Jewish casualties.

The initial news reports on 7/7, London's worst bomb attack since World War Two, stated that Israel's (then) Finance Minister and former PM Binyamin "Bibi" Netanyahu was warned in advance of the explosions. Netanyahu, scheduled to speak at the 4th annual Tel Aviv Stock Exchange (TASE) Investors Conference in the Great Eastern Hotel, arrived in London on Wednesday night and was staying at a Mayfair hotel. Original reports stated that warnings before the attacks prompted him to remain in his hotel room, and revised accounts held that he was "on his way to the hotel" when he was warned "after the first explosion".

It was necessary to explain why Netanyahu did not show up at the TASE conference. The original plan (of Israel and the mainstream media) was to report that Scotland Yard warned the security officer at the Israeli Embassy who in turn warned Netanyahu, a few minutes in advance of multiple simultaneous explosions on the London Underground, which were followed by a bus bombing. The simultaneity of the Tube train bombings would "prove" that the attack had "all the hallmarks of al Qaeda". When Scotland Yard refused to play along, Israel could not admit foreknowledge, leaving the original "warned by Scotland Yard before the attacks" claim dead in the water.

Following negotiations, the UK authorities did agree to a minor rewriting of the script. A version where the three Tube explosions were spread over a period of 26 minutes, from 08:51 to 09:17, allowed the Netanyahu warning story to be revised to "after the first explosion". With several detonations occurring after the warning, the decision to avoid the conference would have been vindicated. It was hoped that the warning story would be forgotten two days later, by which time the simultaneous Tube explosions account would be resurrected.

Unfortunately, the new improved script still incriminated Israel. Until the bus bombing, almost an hour after the attack began, the British police believed that the incidents were related to "power surges" rather than bombs. In fact, the explosions caused power surges after rails were shorted out by metal debris.

A former head of the Mossad, Efraim Halevi, wrote a piece about the London "multiple simultaneous" bombings in the July 7 online edition of the Jerusalem Post. But if the official story is correct, Israel is innocent, and Israeli-UK negotiations on the warning story did not take place as above, then Halevi could not have known that the explosions were simultaneous, two days before the London police knew. Clearly, most of the article was pre-written, and Halevi forgot to revise the paragraph about simultaneity on the day.

There was also a report in the German newspaper, Bild am Sonntag, that the Mossad office in London received advance notice of the attacks, but only six minutes before the first blast. In fact, they would have known days earlier. But if their story were true, it would be an extraordinary coincidence that they learned of the attacks just in time to warn Netanyahu, but too late to warn anyone else.

The oil deal double-cross motive for whacking the UK and Egypt with their biggest terror attacks for at least 17 years, the Netanyahu warning fiasco, Halevi's prior knowledge that the explosions were simultaneous, and the admission of the Mossad London cell's prior knowledge are all events that are correlated with the truth-value of Israel's guilt.

Another interesting test is the nationality of the company that was selected by Metronet Rail to provide a "networked video solution" for installation in the entire London Underground. The company is Verint Systems, previously known as Comverse Infosys (before February 1, 2002), and is a subsidiary of Israel's Comverse Technology. The Israeli security company's control of the software and computers involved in Verint Systems' "networked video solution" enabled multiple 'malfunctions' to occur at the very times and places that a Mossad operation was in progress. Hence, they had a camera-free window of opportunity to install the 7/7 bombs. The zionist mafia's massive spy network, and puppet "leaders" of government and police etc who are either bribed, blackmailed, or brainwashed Masons, provided them with the means and the opportunity.

Information that surfaced at the end of August 2005 dealt another fatal blow to the official 7/7 attacks theory. Police claimed that four "Muslim suicide bombers" were filmed at Luton station at 7:22 and took the 7:40 Thameslink train to King's Cross, where they were filmed at 8:26. However, the relevant trains did not run to schedule on July 7, due to problems with the overhead lines in the Mill Hill area of North London, between Luton and King's Cross. Thameslink's 7:40, 7:46 and 7:56 trains were cancelled, and others were delayed (arrival at King's Cross but not departure from Luton) by up to 35 minutes.

The 7:24 departed Luton at 7:25. Independent trials have shown that it takes over three minutes to walk up the steps to the ticket office and down to the platform. In the image of Hasib Hussain on the stairs, he is not running. For the official theory to hav