Safe Mode: On
the new middle east
 Part of channel(s): Iraq (current event), Afghanistan (current event)

“Hegemony is as old as Mankind…” -Zbigniew Brzezinski, former U.S. National Security Advisor

Ladies and Gentlemen I'd like to introduce you to the NEW middle east that the U.S is planning on. This new middle east will create new nations, reduce the size of others. The new middle east threatens the delicate balance that exists between a variety of groups, races, and religions. It will probably take many years for this to be completed but as some of you may know thats what they also said about the 'war on terror'.

The term “New Middle East” was introduced to the world in June 2006 in Tel Aviv by U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice (who was credited by the Western media for coining the term) in replacement of the older and more imposing term, the “Greater Middle East.” Prime Minister Olmert and Secretary Rice had informed the international media that a project for a “New Middle East” was being launched from Lebanon .

This announcement was a confirmation of an Anglo-American-Israeli “military roadmap” in the Middle East . This project, which has been in the planning stages for several years, consists in creating an arc of instability, chaos, and violence extending from Lebanon , Palestine , and Syria to Iraq , the Persian Gulf, Iran , and the borders of NATO-garrisoned Afghanistan.

The “New Middle East” project was introduced publicly by Washington and Tel Aviv with the expectation that Lebanon would be the pressure point for realigning the whole Middle East and thereby unleashing the forces of “constructive chaos.” This “constructive chaos” --which generates conditions of violence and warfare throughout the region-- would in turn be used so that the United States , Britain , and Israel could redraw the map of the Middle East in accordance with their geo-strategic needs and objectives.

Secretary Condoleezza Rice stated during a press conference that “[w]hat we’re seeing here [in regards to the destruction of Lebanon and the Israeli attacks on Lebanon], in a sense, is the growing—the ‘birth pangs’—of a ‘New Middle East’ and whatever we do we [meaning the United States] have to be certain that we’re pushing forward to the New Middle East [and] not going back to the old one.”1 Secretary Rice was immediately criticized for her statements both within Lebanon and internationally for expressing indifference to the suffering of an entire nation, which was being bombed indiscriminately by the Israeli Air Force.

U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice’s speech on the "New Middle East" had set the stage. The Israeli attacks on Lebanon --which had been fully endorsed by Washington and London-- have further compromised and validated the existence of the geo-strategic objectives of the United States , Britain , and Israel . According to Professor Mark Levine the “neo-liberal globalizers and neo-conservatives, and ultimately the Bush Administration, would latch on to creative destruction as a way of describing the process by which they hoped to create their new world orders,” and that “creative destruction [in] the United States was, in the words of neo-conservative philosopher and Bush adviser Michael Ledeen, ‘an awesome revolutionary force’ for (…) creative destruction…”

The whole thing is relatively simple, divide and conquer. It seems clear that the 3rd world war, will not be like past 2 major world wars. Instead it would be a slow war, that will take many years, in order to achieve a common goal between Israel, U.S and Britain. The creation of a "Kurdistan" for instance would be heavily opposed by first and foremost Turkey, a NATO ally of the united states and basically the only Muslim nation that has relatively good ties with Israel. Not only that but Iraq, along with Iran, which also would lose territory according to the map would oppose a "Kurdistan". This is simply a small percentage of the entire project which will attempt to change the middle east not just in its geography but also structurally.

The already strong anti-American dissent in the middle east and in fact all around the world is strong. the more people find out about the destructive 'new middle east' project the more the dissents will become. When the world screams for peace, our leaders do the exact opposite. An estimated 600,000 (conservatively) iraqis have lost their lives in the latest iraq war and they continue to do so. From the eyes that look at it all from a distant can clearly see that what ever happens, happens to the weak and the poor, after all, it is not Bush, or a congressman that sends their sons to war. the whole situation is so messed up it would take too long to cover it all. simply put, do you research, dont rely on fox news or any other mainstream news source, put the pieces together and you will see a picture forming.

peace.


Click to view image: '92513-condi.jpg'

Click to view image: '92513-hamas.jpg'

Click to view image: '92513-the_new_middle_east.jpeg'

Click to view image: '92513-democratizing_the_middle_east.jpg'

Click to view image: '92513-turkish_middle_east_project.jpg'

Added: Sep-9-2007 
By: ibzmate
In:
Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, News
Tags: middle, east, nwo, 9/11, israel, war, U.S, britain, new, middle, east, great, middle, east, project, islam, arab, kurd, turkish, turkey, kurdistan, iran, nuclear,
Views: 27908 | Comments: 51 | Votes: 1 | Favorites: 3 | Shared: 6 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 4
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE