Safe Mode: On
Insider trading one day before 9/11/01 

•Huge
financial transactions have been reported to have taken place at
computers at the World Trade Center minutes before the attacks.
•Selling short (borrowing a stock and selling it, then returning it later through purchasing).
•Markets outside the United States.
•Disappearances of gold and securities from the World Trade Center.
•The
specific financial firms directly hit by planes, and the financial
investigations sabotaged by the WTC or Pentagon attacks.
•Insurance payoffs, particularly to the owner of destroyed buildings, particularly to Larry Silverstein.
•Large increases in the M1 money supply in the United States have been
reported for July and August 2001 and explanations have been sought.

Loading the player ...
Embed CodeSwitch Player
Plays: 817 (Embed: 0)

Added: Sep-13-2012 
By: JohnMcLane2008
In:
Conspiracy
Tags: finacial transactions, trading, 911, insider trading, stock markets, wall street
Views: 1760 | Comments: 40 | Votes: 7 | Favorites: 5 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • In January 2001, Silverstein, via Silverstein Properties and Westfield America, made a $3.2 billion bid for the lease to the World Trade Center. Silverstein was outbid by $50 million by Vornado Realty, with Boston Properties and Brookfield Properties also competing for the lease. However, Vornado withdrew and Silverstein's bid for the lease to the World Trade Center was accepted on July 24, 2001. This was the first time in the building's 31-year history that the complex had changed management. T More..

    Posted Sep-13-2012 By 

    (5) | Report

    • @Dear Leader thank you for posting this

      Posted Sep-13-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @Dear Leader
      If Silverstein got that much cash, why is the new tower being built with tax revenue?

      Posted Sep-13-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @saul693 best get the goyim to pay, schmuks.

      Posted Sep-13-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @saul693 They aren't.

      The WTC is made up of a number of different projects, and the financial situation is different for each.

      One World Trade Center, the tallest tower, is being paid for partly by a portion of Silverstein Properties insurance settlement that under the 2005 Master Agreement, he had to hand over to the Port Authority, which owns the site. One WTC is also being financed by the issuance of Liberty Bonds, which were created for the purpose of rebuilding downtown. Investors buy the More..

      Posted Sep-13-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @Dear Leader
      But I saw it in Liveleak, it must be true!!

      Posted Sep-13-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

  • good post. voted. if you buy the official account, you're lying to yourself.

    Posted Sep-13-2012 By 

    (2) | Report

  • thats why I only trust my Dog

    Posted Sep-13-2012 By 

    (2) | Report

  • Yup fishy as hell.....now who would have that kind of money and also some how potentionaly have inside knowledge....that list would be short I bet......err nothing to see here move along sheeple,we will sweep it under the carpet and NEVER mention it again!!

    Posted Sep-13-2012 By 

    (1) | Report

  • hmmmmmmmm wonder why we never heard of this again... or the outcome of the investigation.

    Posted Sep-13-2012 By 

    (1) | Report

    • Comment of user 'RugOutFromUnderYou' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • Comment of user 'Stab_City' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • Hmmm, interesting. I for one do not blindly believe in all the conspiracy theories. But one had to admit... that all seems rather too convenient to be coincidence!

    Posted Sep-13-2012 By 

    (1) | Report

    • @bmused55
      Many people hold the view that nothing this big could be kept a secret ....but when you think about it it never has been,all they have done is convince the public that non of this information is true.....its all just a "conspiracy theory"

      Posted Sep-13-2012 By 

      (2) | Report

    • @MR tommygun hidden in plain sight

      Posted Sep-13-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @MR tommygun I will admit, I am a BIG plane buff. I for one dispute the pentagon attack. A 757 could never have hit that building at that speed, angle and height, it is physically impossible. That alone is enough to make me ponder all the other inconsistencies for the event. I will not commit to saying it was an inside job, but I cannot dismiss the possibility either. So many things just don't add up.

      Posted Sep-13-2012 By 

      (3) | Report

    • @bmused55 It is quite laughable that the NTSB released data of the apparant plane hitting the pentagon... and the data showed that the plane was doing more than 100 knots over it's maximum limit.

      If the NTSB was right in what they said the wings would have torn off the plane and it would have disintegrated from that speed... well before it even got close to the Pentagon.

      Posted Sep-13-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • Comment of user 'RugOutFromUnderYou' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • Seems a lot of people knew about it, apart from the poor souls who where in the trade centre.

    Posted Sep-13-2012 By 

    (1) | Report

  • Terrorists did this? Ha! I don't believe it.

    Posted Sep-13-2012 By 

    (1) | Report

  • I'm not able to understand everything, but what i understood is simply horrible. Someone knews bevore.. Maybe.

    Posted Sep-13-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

  • bullshit

    Posted Sep-13-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

  • I see brain cells getting traded on LL.

    Posted Sep-13-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

  • I don't believe in a conspiracy theory but this is the biggest coincidence I have ever heard of. And no outcome of these unique transactions have ever been published and nobody knows who exactly made those profit? Very strange to say the least...

    Posted Sep-13-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

    • @Bullitt Yup. Almost as strange as 80+ cameras at the Pentagon.. and yet not a single second of footage was ever released showing a plane hitting the building.

      Posted Sep-13-2012 By 

      (1) | Report

    • Comment of user 'RugOutFromUnderYou' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @RugOutFromUnderYou - Either what you say or ABC has the worst journalist in America.

      Posted Sep-13-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • Comment of user 'RugOutFromUnderYou' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @RugOutFromUnderYou

      You make sense, I believe you. Thanks mate.

      Posted Sep-13-2012 By 

      (1) | Report

  • Comment of user 'anymoose' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • are people overlooking that bin Laden's family has/had lots of money and was able to buy stock? After all, he DID know about the attacks. Why is it so far fetched to think that al-Queda were the ones buying the "hooks"?

    Posted Sep-13-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

    • @jgaller29 and yet.. no evidence at all (admitted by the FBI) that Bin Laden was ever involved in 9/11. The only evidence we do have is that Larry Silverstein miraculously insured his building against a terrorist attack only weeks before the attacks.

      Posted Sep-13-2012 By 

      (3) | Report

    • @Total_package fine, remove bin Laden, say Al-Queda instead. No doubting that they were behind it (sorry "truthers") and had the money to invest. If they knew they were about to do something that would detroy our economy, why not make money off of it?

      Posted Sep-13-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @jgaller29 Look up the name Larry Silverstein.

      Posted Sep-13-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

  • Comment of user 'RugOutFromUnderYou' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • This happens all the time!!!!

    Posted Sep-13-2012 By 

    (0) | Report