Child get hit by sniper - Sarajevo 1992
With titles...
Loading the player ...
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
Items
-
Muslim sniper shoots 2 US soldiers (2)
-
Libyan Embassy in Sarajevo Ransacked
-
Life Inside Gitmo: Former Detainee Speaks
-
Sniper Brings Quick End To Hostage Stand Off
-
Unemployment riots in Bosnia
-
French Soldier Killed by Sniper in Sarajevo
-
Croatian film wins Sarajevo film festival: By Maja Zuvela Saturday, August 23, 2008; 6:09 PM
-
two airstrike in bosnia
-
Hillary Clinton Lies About Her Bosnia Trip
-
Serbia Cleared of Genocide claims in Bosnia
-
Bosnia - "School Between the Fronts" (Feb.2009)
Advertisers
Posted Jun-20-2007 Byjobko (15.72) 
jobko View Channel Send Message
(0)
As to your questions.
Last bit of velocity? What the heck does that
mean? Velocity is the speed so your question
makes no sense.
Momentum and retained footpounds of energy are
what would be relevant.
If it was a ricochote it would first mean the
child was no a target thus taking away the videos
assertion the child was an intentional sniper
victim and was hit by a random event which is what
a ricochete is.
In any event the .223 is deadly at long range.
Even at 300 yards it has 655-710 ft. lbs of enery
which would punch through a child's are like a
knife through butter and a NATO 7.62 would have
even greater energy at 300 yards.
As to the "not every bullet acts the
same". Well in a way they do within reason.
This being a suppossed war related shooting they
would be shooting standard NATO ammunition.
The .223 has a muzzle velocity of 3100 FPS and the
.308 has 2900FPS but weighs 3 times as much and
thus has much greater killing power at longer
ranges.
How the bullet "acts" in flight is the
same each and every time, especially a sniper's
rifle.
They can make lethal shoots at 600, 800, 1000,
even up to a mile.
Even had this child been shot INTENTIONALLY at 500
to 600 yards the wound would be lethal and not
like what is pictured.
A child's arm is very soft and the bullet would
have passed through OR if NOT there would only be
one entry wound and not two entry wounds and NO
exit wounds as this picture shows.
Use your common sense.
If the bullet hit the arm first then the chest
where is the exit wound on the arm?? And IF it
had enough kinetic energy to pass through the arm
there would be lots of damage and bleeding and the
wound to the upper thorax underneath the armpit
would be fatal.
Plus you completely disregard all the other points
I brought up."
Maybe the bullet chafed his upper triceps and did the same with his lat?
Even if not, you don't need to boost your ego by stating numerous facts about muzzle velocity and footpounds of energy remaining as you don't know anything about the context of the shooting.Maybe they serve only to feed you ego.
Posted Jun-24-2007 Byavion85 (10.76) avion85 View Channel Send Message
(0)
ive dodged a few of those and seen many who have not crazy how serbs targeted civillian after civillian no age no mercy nothing stopeed them
Posted Jul-10-2007 ByBIHAMEL (10.84) BIHAMEL View Channel Send Message
(0)
As to your questions.
Last bit of velocity? What the heck does that mean? Velocity is the speed so your question makes no sense.
Momentum and retained footpounds of energy are what would be relevant.
If it was a ricochote it would first mean the child was no a target thus taking away the videos assertion the child was an intentional sniper victim and was hit by a random event which is what a ricochete is.
In any event the .223 is deadly at long range. Even at 300 yards it has 655-710 ft. lbs of enery which would punch through a child's are like a knife through butter and a NATO 7.62 would have even greater energy at 300 yards.
As to the "not every bullet acts the same". Well in a way they do within reason.
This being a suppossed war related shooting they would be shooting standard NATO ammunition.
The .223 has a muzzle velocity of 3100 FPS and the .308 has 2900FPS but weighs 3 times as much and thus has much greater killing power at longer ranges.
How the bullet "acts" in flight is the same each and every time, especially a sniper's rifle.
They can make lethal shoots at 600, 800, 1000, even up to a mile.
Even had this child been shot INTENTIONALLY at 500 to 600 yards the wound would be lethal and not like what is pictured.
A child's arm is very soft and the bullet would have passed through OR if NOT there would only be one entry wound and not two entry wounds and NO exit wounds as this picture shows.
Use your common sense.
If the bullet hit the arm first then the chest where is the exit wound on the arm?? And IF it had enough kinetic energy to pass through the arm there would be lots of damage and bleeding and the wound to the upper thorax underneath the armpit would be fatal.
Plus you completely disregard all the other points I brought up."
Posted Jul-10-2007 ByHajdarevic (14.94) Hajdarevic View Channel Send Message
(0)
Posted Jul-14-2007 ByBigSerb (13.64) BigSerb View Channel Send Message
(0)
As to your questions.
Last bit of velocity? What the heck does that
mean? Velocity is the speed so your question
makes no sense.
Momentum and retained footpounds of energy are
what would be relevant.
If it was a ricochote it would first mean the
child was no a target thus taking away the videos
assertion the child was an intentional sniper
victim and was hit by a random event which is what
a ricochete is.
In any event the .223 is deadly at long range.
Even at 300 yards it has 655-710 ft. lbs of enery
which would punch through a child's are like a
knife through butter and a NATO 7.62 would have
even greater energy at 300 yards.
As to the "not every bullet acts the
same". Well in a way they do within reason.
This being a suppossed war related shooting they
would be shooting standard NATO ammunition.
The .223 has a muzzle velocity of 3100 FPS and the
.308 has 2900FPS but weighs 3 times as much and
thus has much greater killing power at longer
ranges.
How the bullet "acts" in flight is the
same each and every time, especially a sniper's
rifle.
They can make lethal shoots at 600, 800, 1000,
even up to a mile.
Even had this child been shot INTENTIONALLY at 500
to 600 yards the wound would be lethal and not
like what is pictured.
A child's arm is very soft and the bullet would
have passed through OR if NOT there would only be
one entry wound and not two entry wounds and NO
exit wounds as this picture shows.
Use your common sense.
If the bullet hit the arm first then the chest
where is the exit wound on the arm?? And IF it
had enough kinetic energy to pass through the arm
there would be lots of damage and bleeding and the
wound to the upper thorax underneath the armpit
would be fatal.
Plus you completely disregard all the other points
I brought up."
Maybe the bullet chafed his upper triceps and did the same with his lat?
Even if not, you don't need to boost your ego by stating numerous facts about muzzle velocity and footpounds of energy remaining as you don't know anything about the context of the shooting.Maybe they serve only to feed you ego.
"
Posted Jul-14-2007 ByBigSerb (13.64) BigSerb View Channel Send Message
(0)
This is days after the wound. No cry. They use morphine in wars even in children and with a lung trauma (rock an roll). Look at his pupils...kiddin.
Passed by (not through) the deltoid and took some pieces of pleura surface. The wounds are surgicaly cleaned thats why are circled and uncovered for TV.Maybe made haemothorax, the boy has a tube in the wound and in the lower pleuric-ribbon space...This could be by a far distanced sniper, not like in Washington.By the way pneumothorax: we prefer it t More..
Posted Aug-12-2007 ByZeus1967 (24.24) Zeus1967 View Channel Send Message
(0)
Of course no lung trauma here.Meaning breathing problems (english not my native sorry).
Posted Aug-12-2007 ByZeus1967 (24.24) Zeus1967 View Channel Send Message
(0)
And for god's sake Dragan is a serb or croatian name. Somebody knows which side made this video?
Posted Aug-12-2007 ByZeus1967 (24.24) Zeus1967 View Channel Send Message
(0)
PROPAGANDAAAAA
Posted Sep-5-2007 ByWarkan (3349.64) 
Warkan View Channel Send Message
(0)
take aim at children."
But they did."
Posted Sep-20-2007 Byuntamwlf (19.64) untamwlf View Channel Send Message
(0)
Poor child. Serbs used Sarajevo as target practice, and turned one of the most beautiful cities in europe into a pile of dust. Most of the people there were atheists and progressive europeans before serbs decided to try and steal their tv-s and vcr-s, fucking peasants. The only fundamentalists in former yugoslavia are the serbs, but luckily the US and the rest of Europe helped the bosniaks, because they realised that serbs are uncivilized monsters.
People in Bosnia were not that religious befor More..
Posted Oct-20-2007 Bycolliedude (10.28) colliedude View Channel Send Message
(0)
propaganda bullshit. burn that child's house down to make him pay for war crimes against serbian nation!
Posted Dec-14-2007 Bybruges (10.20) bruges View Channel Send Message
(0)
/hug
Posted Dec-18-2008 Byzorglubb99 (99.60) zorglubb99 View Channel Send Message
(0)
majku im bolestnu, gdje ces djecu ubijati, majku vam bolestnu, bilo ko ga opuco, majku i sve mu jebem...whoever shot this kid, i hope you will burn in hell
Posted Aug-22-2009 BySabanecki (119.14) 
Sabanecki View Channel Send Message
(0)