Members of the Syrian oppositions manipulating the basic facts to blame the bloody attack against Aleppo University on the Syrian state. One of them is Hamadthejournalist his claims and the facts:
LIE OF OPPOSITION: Car bomb attack that was spread by the SAA Media and propagandist is fake.
TRUTH: In fact, car bomb attack is a lie of opposition. Syria has been claiming that it was not a car bomb but "ROCKET ATTACK" check state run agency: "Terrorists Fire Rocket Shells on Aleppo University and Bani Zaid Area, Causing Casualties" source: http://sana.sy/eng/337/2013/01/16/461940.htm
LIE: Everyone knows that such intense and destructive missile are possessed solely by SAA.
TRUTH: An AFP photo showing militants firing a missile capable of huge destruction in Aleppo: Photo source: http://www.windsorstar.com/news/7829273.bin?size=640x420
LIE: you can hear the aviation sound clearly at 00:40
TRUTH: In fact we hear the sound of fire after the blast at 00:40. If this was a raid, then people around the university would have paid attention to the sky& If this was an Air to surface missile probably the pilot would have maneuvered or drawn a circle/circles around the university so
we would have heard its sound but instead. We hear the sound of missile for a few
seconds before the university was hit and the fire caused by blast. In fact, aircraft fired missile towards the target. So if this was a raid, the roar of the aircraft would have been louder and louder for a few seconds after the attack.
LIE: This was a raid of Syrian Air Force (SAF)
TRUTH: A rebel commander told Reuters a different story from the rest of opposition: "Blasts appeared to have been caused by ground-to-ground missiles" (NOT an air-to-ground missile as opposition claimed) Source: http://in.reuters.com/article/2013/01/15/syria-crisis-aleppo-idINDEE90E0HH20130115
LIE: This was a bloody job of Assad,
TRUTH: Some of the FSA commanders in Aleppo told Guardian Correspondent that the real responsible of the attack was probably Al Nusra Front: "That said, there is rising suspicion that these blasts may have been caused by rockets which were fired from the countryside to the west of the city.
Now that’s an area that is partly controlled by opposition groups, including the jihadist group Jabhat al-Nusra, who are yet to comment about government claims that terrorist groups such as themselves may have been responsible" Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/middle-east-live/2013/jan/16/syria-us-denies-assad-regime-has-used-chemical-weapons-live-updates
5- DISINFORMATION: The opposition never mentioned that the university campus was in the full control of the SAA during the attack, so they never answer this question "Why did SAF attack an university which is already in its control? Why!!!
6- EXPERT BLAMES MILITANTS NOT SAA:
An ex-officer of Turkish army evaluates the video and challenges the claims of oppositions. He said the claims of SAA have a consistency but the claims of opposition are not: Read the his opinions:
|Liveleak on Facebook|