Safe Mode: On
DNC Convention: 46 Million Americans on Food-Stamps - Obama needs 4 more years to finish the job

Food-Stamp Use Climbs to Record, Reviving Campaign Issue

By Alan Bjerga - Sep 4, 2012 2:24 PM ET

Food-stamp use reached a record 46.7 million people in June, the government said, as Democrats prepare to nominate President Barack Obama for a second term with the economy as a chief issue in the campaign.

Participation was up 0.4 percent from May and 3.3 percent higher than a year earlier and has remained greater than 46 million all year as the unemployment rate stayed higher than 8 percent. New jobless numbers will be released Sept. 7.

“Too many middle-class families who have fallen on hard times are still struggling,” Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said in an e-mailed statement today. “Our goal is to get these families the temporary assistance they need so they are able to get through these tough times and back on their feet as soon as possible.”

Food-stamp spending, which more than doubled in four years to a record $75.7 billion in the fiscal year ended Sept. 30, 2011, is the U.S. Department of Agriulture’s biggest annual expense. Republicans in Congress have criticized the cost of the program, and the House budget plan approved in April sponsored by Representative Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, the party’s vice- presidential nominee, would cut expenses by $33 billion over 10 years.
Cuts Planned

“We need a new direction,” Amanda Henneberg, a spokeswoman for Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney, said in an e-mail. “Democrats are desperately trying to convince voters that they are better off than they were four years ago. But the opposite is true,” as evidenced by the food- stamp numbers, she said.

Reductions to the program have also emerged as a point of contention in debate over a farm bill to replace current law that expires Sept. 30. The U.S. Senate in June passed a plan that would lower expenditures by $4 billion over 10 years, while the House Agriculture Committee the following month backed a $16 billion cut.

During the Republican primary campaign, then-candidate Newt Gingrich labeled Obama as “the best food-stamp president in American history.” When the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People called his statements “inaccurate” and “divisive,” Gingrich dismissed the complaints as a smear from “modern liberals” who are “off the deep end.”

Food-stamp enrollment is rising partly because the USDA is pushing higher participation too aggressively, giving government money to people who may not need or want it, U.S. Senator Jeff Sessions said in a telephone interview.
‘Government Incompetence’

“This administration has been hawking food stamps,” said the Alabama Republican, who has called for lower spending on the program. “Every additional dollar in this program is borrowed money,” he said. “It’s one more example of government incompetence.”

Today’s report shows the two most populous states, California and Texas, had the most recipients. California was tops with 4.012 million, a 0.8 percent gain from the previous month and 7.3 percent more than the previous year. Texas was in second place, while down 0.4 percent from the previous month and 1.4 percent lower than a year earlier.

Louisiana and North Carolina, where Democrats are meeting this week to nominate Obama, had the biggest monthly gains in enrollment, 1.3 percent. Enrollment fell the most in Utah, down 1.4 percent from May, followed by Idaho and Ohio.

Spending on what’s officially called the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program totaled $6.21 billion in June, 0.4 percent higher than the previous month and 2.8 percent more than a year earlier. The record is $6.26 billion spent in September 2011.

About 47 percent of recipients are children, and 8 percent are elderly, according to the USDA. About half of all new recipients leave the program within 10 months.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-04/food-stamp-use-climbed-to-record-46-7-million-in-june-u-s-says.html


Added: Sep-4-2012 Occurred On: Sep-4-2012
By: XyBerFuNK
In:
Politics
Tags: Obama Disaster, DNC Convention, Cloward-Piven, Democrat Tyrants, Economic Suicide
Location: United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 2684 | Comments: 40 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • "We should measure welfare's success by how many people leave welfare, not by how many are added."
    -Ronald Reagan

    Posted Sep-4-2012 By 

    (7)

    • @doood It's a good quote... But, he also said, "The best welfare is a job"...

      Also a good quote.. If only there were jobs... Can't blame that on Obama...

      Posted Sep-4-2012 By 

      (-1)

    • Comment of user 'T0M65' has been deleted by author!
    • @T0M65 I don't think so...

      But, that's my opinion...

      Posted Sep-4-2012 By 

      (-1)

    • @ILovePickles I'm sure none of these actions he has done hurt it what so ever..... Pfft...

      1) Obama’s Overregulation

      During President Obama’s first 26 months in office, his Administration imposed 75 new major regulations, with reported costs to the private sector exceeding $40 billion, as The Heritage Foundation’s James Gattuso and Diane Katz document in ”Red Tape Rising: A 2011 Mid-Year Report.” That’s more than any comparable period on record. The annual cost of regulation–$1. More..

      Posted Sep-4-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @dankmofo

      Yeah, I've read that before... I'm fairly confident that it's one-sided without looking at the "Pro's"... Seriously sir.. You need to get to the facts instead of the opinions...

      :)

      Posted Sep-4-2012 By 

      (-1)

  • "Democrats are desperately trying to convince voters that they are better off than they were four years ago."
    If we WERE better off then four years ago, nobody would be "trying DESPERATELY" to convince voters that they ARE better off then four years ago.
    obama=failure.

    Posted Sep-4-2012 By 

    (5)

    • @dontknowzed
      Shit is far from perfect, but anyone who thinks we were better off 4 years ago than we are now has fucking brain damage. The entire economy was on the verge of collapse in the summer of 2008.

      Posted Sep-4-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @picklethepug
      "On the verge" is the operative phrase here. We are no longer on the so-called verge anymore. The verge is hell and gone from where we started with this amazing administration.

      Posted Sep-5-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @dontknowzed

      It's a disingenuous question to anyone with a shred of common sense.

      If your house were on fire and the firefighters raced to the scene, they'd set up their hoses and start spraying water on the blaze as quickly as possible. After the fire was put out, the courageous news reporter on the scene would ask the chief firefighter, "is the house in better shape than when you got here?"

      Understanding this simple concept requires rational thought, so don't worry about it.

      Posted Sep-5-2012 By 

      (0)

  • He isn't finished destroying America yet.

    Posted Sep-4-2012 By 

    (4)

  • What is the difference between a Romney supporter and an Obama supporter?
    A Romney supporter signs his check on the front

    Posted Sep-4-2012 By 

    (4)

  • 46 million on food-stamps?

    What is the GOP alternative, do NOT give them food-stamps and let the poor bastards die?

    Sounds like a truly Christian plan...

    Posted Sep-5-2012 By 

    (3)

    • @Tuuri56
      You should spend some time actually reading the Bible. Christian theology does not abide largesse and sloth.

      You might recall the story about feeding a man a fish versus teaching him how to fish. Well, given the second option, once in a while, the man does have to get up off his ass and go fishing.

      Posted Sep-5-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @copperdog3
      "Christian theology does not abide largesse and sloth."
      That sounds very nice.

      Meanwhile in the real world, those people who need foodstamps should just get up off their asses and get a job.

      From the millions of jobs available in the US. Got it.

      Posted Sep-5-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @Tuuri56
      Yeah. The poor in America have a lifestyle unparalleled in the world. That said, they could at least mow the grass and sweep the sidewalks in exchange for their free EBT (food stamps) cards. The lib dems would have them comfy and fully air conditioned. Conservatives would have them doing some damn thing in exchange for their freebies. Polishing golf balls at the local public course for example. Bottom line: welfare recipients should do SOMETHING for their benefits.

      Posted Sep-5-2012 By 

      (0)

  • What was left out is that Food Stamps doubled under President Bush... From $18 to $40 Billion...

    Huh...

    Okay....

    Signs of the times people... People still need to eat, even when they can't work... (BTW, the last analysis reported that 48% of Food Stamp recipients call themselves Republicans...)

    Posted Sep-4-2012 By 

    (1)

    • Comment of user 'T0M65' has been deleted by author!
    • Comment of user 'T0M65' has been deleted by author!
    • Comment of user 'T0M65' has been deleted by author!
    • @T0M65

      Nooo... Tom listen... I always thumb up intelligent answers... I may not agree with them, but if it was intelligent, I'll give it a thumbs up...

      You're good... *have a Corona*

      Posted Sep-4-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @ILovePickles I love pickles too

      :-)

      Posted Sep-4-2012 By 

      (0)

  • Hope and Change. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Posted Sep-4-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Obama Money?

    Posted Sep-4-2012 By 

    (0)

  • But 11 years of trickle down economics isn't long enough. The rich need 15 years of even lower tax rates before it will "kick in", eh?

    Posted Sep-4-2012 By 

    (-1)

    • @picklethepug
      I'll bet you just cannot wait to vote for a higher minimum wage... right?

      Posted Sep-5-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @copperdog3
      I personally make about 8 times minimum wage so it won't really effect me, but if giving the millions of minimum wage workers in the US a $2/hour raise so they can better afford their rent and food I'm all for it. I suppose you would prefer they stay on food stamps?

      Posted Sep-5-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @picklethepug
      And what effect do you think such an arbitrary raise would have on the economy?* Let alone your own spending power? Care to pay $19 for a cheeseburger because you are such a feeling, sympathetic liberal?

      I assure you, 99% of the people around you will not abide such inflation. Therein lies the big O philosophy.

      *by effect on the economy, I mean the depression of everyone's spending. The net effect will be even more people on the dole. You Kensyian liberals just never get More..

      Posted Sep-5-2012 By 

      (0)

  • The biggest congregation of libtards in the US all in one place.

    Posted Sep-4-2012 By 

    (-2)