Safe Mode: On
Who Could Oppose a Jobs Bill for Veterans?

By LAWRENCE DOWNES
Senator Patty Murray on September 5, 2012. Congressional
Republicans, resolute in their commitment to deny the Democrats
anything that looks like an accomplishment in an election year, have
spent the week obstructing passage of the Veterans Job Corps Act of
2012. It’s a perfectly inoffensive bill from Senator Patty Murray, the
Washington Democrat, meant to increase hiring and job training for
veterans, especially those who served in Iraq and Afghanistan.Who
could oppose hiring more veterans as cops, firefighters and
national-parks workers? Who could be against helping veterans apply
their military training to earn civilian occupational licenses? The
unemployment rate for new veterans hit nearly 11 percent in August,
compared with 8.1 percent nationwide. Veterans and active-duty soldiers
are committing suicide at alarming rates. The men and women who defend
America in uniform are 1 percent of the population. Why shouldn’t the 99
percent give them a hand?

I’ll let the Republicans explain.Senator
Tom Coburn of Oklahoma says it is dishonorable and cowardly to help
veterans find jobs when there are more important things (what?) to do.
Perhaps forgetting where he worked, he denounced the legislation on
Wednesday as a “political exercise” and a waste of time, since the House
wasn’t going to pass it anyway. (If that’s going to be the standard,
the Senate might as well shut off the utilities.)“Where is
our honor? Where is our valor? Where is our sacrifice?” thundered Mr.
Coburn, immediately after suggesting that the bill cost too much.Rand
Paul of Kentucky went further, saying he would block the bill until
Pakistan freed Shakil Afridi, the doctor who helped the United States
find Osama bin Laden. He also wants to halt all American aid to Pakistan
until Dr. Afridi is released. If that halts American aid to veterans,
too bad.“I care deeply about the veterans . I care deeply about
housing and helping the veterans who have fought for their country. But
this is about whether we as a country and the American taxpayers will be
asked to send good money after bad to allies that are not acting like
allies.”It’s only “about” that because of Mr. Paul. This ought to be about jobs for veterans.

Ms.
Murray has not managed to open the Pakistani prison cell, but she has
tried to make her bill as bipartisan as possible, by incorporating
wholesale additions from Richard Burr, a North Carolina Republican. The
Senate could have rallied behind this bill, shown its dedication to the
troops, and been done with it by now. But Democrats will have to pass
this bill the hard, slow way, with repeated large votes overcoming
Republican procedural objections. At this rate, it might pass on
Wednesday. Or it might be killed by Republicans committed to making a
bigger point about honor, valor, sacrifice and obstruction.


Added: Sep-19-2012 Occurred On: Sep-19-2012
By: dcmfox
In:
Politics
Tags: gop, opposes, job, bill, veterans
Marked as: approved
Views: 2064 | Comments: 42 | Votes: 3 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • The House should not pass a single bill, of any kind, until the Senate passes a budget.

    Posted Sep-19-2012 By 

    (4)

  • "Supporters needed 60 votes and got only 58 to overcome an objection by Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., that the $1 billion in costs, although paid for through budgetary gimmicks, would have pushed VA over the spending limits set by last year’s Budget Control Act.

    The vote brought an early end to a measure that was already likely to fail. While the bill was a top priority of President Obama and many veterans’ organizations, the House of Representatives had no plans to take it up for consid More..

    Posted Sep-19-2012 By 

    (4)

  • The GOP rejected the bill because it's a new spending bill, which are supposed to originate in the House. The democrats who run the Senate know this. They introduced this bill because they knew it would be voted down. Then they'd go on TV where he suck-ass MSM would repeat democrat bullshit about "Republicans don't want veterans to get jobs." when they know all along that they, the democrats, were procedurally out of order. Also, the democrats have refused to pass a budget for over More..

    Posted Sep-19-2012 By 

    (4)

  • Has anyone besides me bothered to read the bill?
    http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s3457/text
    Do you know how much this costs? At least billion a year, with anual Cost of Living increases. Where is that coming from?

    Also, can anyone tell me what the IRS has to do with this bill?
    I mean, why exactly do we want to expand the rights of the IRS to revoke anyone’s passport as a part of this bill?

    And what does this bill have More..

    Posted Sep-19-2012 By 

    (3)

    • @wharris
      For one, pull out of the wars.
      It can easily come from all the money that goes to the US "allies".
      What is that amount equal to now? $50,000.000 a minute, in the meantime we are borrowing from China.

      Posted Sep-19-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @Rhemis
      unfortunately, the bill does not call for any of that.
      so, its just a spending biill.

      A spending bill that expands the rights of the IRS.

      Posted Sep-19-2012 By 

      (3)

    • @wharris Yep. I was just there reading the bill. Too bad others don't think it's important to know what is hidden inside legislation.

      Posted Sep-19-2012 By 

      (4)

  • Vets should get a chance at good jobs when they return, too bad these idiots use it to bitch and whine at each other

    Posted Sep-19-2012 By 

    (3)

  • what else is in the bill? get back with us on that.

    Posted Sep-19-2012 By 

    (3)

  • "It’s a perfectly inoffensive bill"

    Bullshit.

    Plain and Simple.

    Posted Sep-19-2012 By 

    (2)

  • New Democrat party tactic

    Posted Sep-19-2012 By 

    (2)

  • Holy shit, this bill is going to give the State Department the ability to revoke one's passport if government doesn't get its cut of your money. Typical slimeball libtards, using veterans to advance their tyrranical agenda.

    Posted Sep-20-2012 By 

    (2)

    • @WolfBite120 Idiot.
      Child support already does this.
      And if you owe 50 grand in back taxes you shouldn't be able to leave the country till you pay it back.
      Period.

      Posted Sep-20-2012 By 

      (-1)

    • @Tongueboy

      Big difference between providing money for your child and having greedy bureaucrats siphoning off earnings to pay their fat salaries and porkulus pet projects, dumbfuck.

      And if its such a great law, why sneak it in a completely unrelated bill? Shame on the moonbats.

      Posted Sep-20-2012 By 

      (1)

  • read that out of context

    Posted Sep-19-2012 By 

    (0)

  • The fucking corrupt government doesn't "create" anything....it just wastes and uses.

    Posted Sep-20-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Shameful...Hurry up November!

    Posted Sep-19-2012 By 

    (0)

    • @echo4250 I agree. Hard to believe Democrats would do that, especially since they knew it wouldn't pass because it violates the Budget Control Act they passed last year.

      Obama needs to go, and so do a bunch of "dead wood" in the Senate. Hurry up November.

      Posted Sep-19-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @safetychuck2 Yeah I think ill take obama over Romney any year of the decade.

      Posted Sep-19-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @Adirondack13 It's still a free country, for now. I for one would rather see him go...I can't stand any more lies from someone who is supposed to be our "leader", dividing the country with his racial, social and economic agenda.

      Posted Sep-19-2012 By 

      (2)

  • There's a lot of NO coming from the home states of the majority of soldiers.

    http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/112/senate/2/193

    http://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/112-2012/s192

    Posted Sep-20-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Comment of user 'Americanalltheway' has been deleted by author!
  • Comment of user 'DirtyUncleBerty' has been deleted by author!