By clicking on CONTINUE you confirm that you are 18 years and over.
Note: to turn off these warnings you need to set the 'safe mode' to OFF (on the top right)







The images are the first to show Britain's likely future queen partially nude.
Britain's royal family says it is suing the French magazine that has published topless photos of Prince William's wife Kate.
St James's Palace said Friday that "legal proceedings for breach of privacy have been commenced today in France" by the royal couple.
The French gossip magazine Closer published the blurry images Friday but insisted it had not invaded the couple's privacy.
The palace had earlier called the publication of the images a "grotesque" abuse of privacy. It likened the case to the hounding of William's mother, the late Princess Diana, by paparazzi before her untimely death in 1997.
The couple was "saddened" by the use of the photos, which appear genuine, royal officials said.
Royal officials, who demanded anonymity in line with palace policy, condemned the decision to publish the images.
"Their Royal Highnesses had every expectation of privacy in the remote house. It is unthinkable that anyone should take such photographs, let alone publish them," a St. James's Palace official in London said. "The incident is reminiscent of the worst excesses of the press and paparazzi during the life of Diana, Princess ofWales, and all the more upsetting to the Duke and Duchess for being so."
The palace official said representatives of the couple were consulting with lawyers.
"We feel a line has been crossed with their publication," the official added.
William and Kate, now formally known as the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, were touring the Far East and South Pacific to markQueen Elizabeth II's Diamond Jubilee when the photos were published.
No major British publication carried the photos, including Rupert Murdoch's top-selling U.K. tabloid The Sun, which last month ran photos of a naked Prince Harry cavorting in a Las Vegas hotel room.
Media experts in Britain said concerns that Kate's privacy had been invaded would likely mean the images wouldn't be published by the country's newspapers.
"They won't get published in this country, and if I was still an editor I would not be publishing them," former News of the World executive editor Neil Wallis told BBC radio. "There's absolutely no chance whatsoever that they will be published in this country."
Wallis, who was arrested last year over the phone hacking scandal at Murdoch's infamous — and now defunct — tabloid, said publishing the images would breach British Press Complaints Commission rules on privacy.
The commission — frequently criticized as a toothless guardian of press standards — has told British newspapers it is unacceptable to photograph individuals in private places without their consent.
Wallis said there was no justification to run with the images of the duchess, whereas the publication of photographs of Prince Harry naked in a Las Vegas hotel suite was legitimate as it raised questions both about the security arrangements for the third in line to the British throne and also about his judgment.
The British press has been more cautious than usual in the last year because of the phone hacking scandal, which has uncovered widespread intrusion into the private lives of numerous celebrities, politicians and even crime victims.
A spokeswoman for Prime Minister David Cameron, speaking Friday on condition of anonymity in line with policy, said the royal couple was "entitled to their privacy."
She said Cameron — who had not seen the photographs — was not appealing directly to editors to refrain from printing the images, but reminded the media that a U.K. inquiry is now scrutinizing how newspapers are regulated.
"Clearly editors are there to make their own decisions, but you know that there is a process ongoing in this country which is looking at the media," she said.
A French lawyer who is an expert in media law said the couple would have clear grounds for an invasion of privacy case. Last week, French first lady Valerie Trierweiler won a judgment of €2,000 ($2,580) after the publication of photos of her in a bikini.
"French magistrates take into account the victim's behavior, when the person is flaunting themselves on camera. Kate Middleton will get damages because she's not behaving in this way," said the lawyer, Anne Pigeon-Bormans.
It is common for women in Europe to sunbathe topless, both in private gardens and on public beaches.
Pigeon-Bormans said Diana's relationship with the press was more complicated.
"Diana and Kate are two very different people. Diana had an unhealthy relationship with the press, there was an ambiguity: she would flee them, then court them," she said. "I don't feel that with Kate Middleton, she is more balanced."
By: graziebella
In: Other News
Tags: Kate, Middleton, Topless
Marked as: approved
Views: 76722 | Comments: 146 | Votes: 2 | Favorites: 6 | Shared: 927 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
Direct link:
Direct link without comments:
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
Looks like Kate is gonna be a good bride in taking care of the royal winky!
-
Kate Beckensale - Topless
-
Have You Ever Seen England's Princess Kate In Cowboy Hat And Boots?
-
Prince William and Kate Middleton to open cruel Canadian Calgary Stampede
-
Kate Middleton TOPLESS
-
Kate Moss Topless
-
KATE MOSS TOPLESS DANCING VIDEO
-
Prince William & Kate Middleton Related
-
Kate Moss Topless
-
Outrage at US Republican Magazine
-
Kate Middleton is no commoner!




Royalty...Pffftttt
They all can kiss my Royal ass.
I bow down to no one.
Talk about a dictatorship...royalty...lol
Posted Sep-14-2012 Bydockavorkian (108.28) 
dockavorkian View Channel Send Message
(4)
The whole idea of royalty this day and age is beyond ridiculous.
Posted Sep-14-2012 Bystra (188.40) stra View Channel Send Message
(4)
Thats what happens when you marry a commonor whore instead of a princess.
Posted Sep-14-2012 ByDavdman (25.00) 
Davdman View Channel Send Message
(3)
She's a slapper supported by the British Taxpayer so show here pictures to the world
Posted Sep-15-2012 ByTam36 (0.50) 
Tam36 View Channel Send Message
(3)
@Tam36 ooooooooh talk about vitriolic!!! Maybe you should learn to spell?
Posted Sep-17-2012 Bypinksox3 (0.00) 
pinksox3 View Channel Send Message
(-1)
A million religious muslims are jerking off to these photos right now... only because their goats are tired
Posted Sep-14-2012 Bykillingforgod (736.50) killingforgod View Channel Send Message
(2)
Well, I used to think she was hot...
Posted Sep-14-2012 ByRickPerry2012 (78.40) 
RickPerry2012 View Channel Send Message
(2)
What?
They're suing because she has unbelievably ugly tits?
Fuck them.
Posted Sep-14-2012 ByHiarken (574.04) 
Hiarken View Channel Send Message
(2)
Was only a matter of time.
Posted Sep-14-2012 Bypara001 (779.00) 
para001 View Channel Send Message
(2)
@para001
To be fair, most American guys want to see Pippa.Now THAT would be nice.
Just sayin---
Posted Sep-14-2012 ByFire37Rescue (12235.80) 
Fire37Rescue View Channel Send Message
(3)
@Fire37Rescue I'll get my camera ready incase she pops um out. I tinkle you as soon as.
Posted Sep-14-2012 Bypara001 (779.00) 
para001 View Channel Send Message
(2)
@para001
Thanks. Yeah,Kate is cute and all, no doubts about that.But her sister can start an engine with a dead battery. She's quite the little package.
That ass.
Posted Sep-14-2012 ByFire37Rescue (12235.80) 
Fire37Rescue View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Fire37Rescue LOL
Posted Sep-14-2012 Bypara001 (779.00) 
para001 View Channel Send Message
(1)
So Kate MIDDLETON is in reality a woman with 2 titties ?
I'm shocked !
Posted Sep-14-2012 ByPOLUX (310.60) 
POLUX View Channel Send Message
(2)
im just astounded that there are still kings and queens and princesses and princes still around in the middle east and the uk.
Posted Sep-14-2012 Byuschairforcesgt (552.60) 
uschairforcesgt View Channel Send Message
(2)
@uschairforcesgt It is really an antiquated idea. Royalty sitting in power, living off the people, because God says so...
It doesn't make these paparazzi any less scuzzy though.
Posted Sep-14-2012 ByST0N3PONY (5225.42) 
ST0N3PONY View Channel Send Message
(2)
@ST0N3PONY i agree. i looked at the pictures because i happen to like titties. but what piece of shit hides in the bushes and takes pictures of girls that think they are alone. in my town they would go to jail. over there they get paid big bucks.
Posted Sep-14-2012 Byuschairforcesgt (552.60) 
uschairforcesgt View Channel Send Message
(0)
@uschairforcesgt They got Prince Harry or whatever his name is too. Taking a leak. Zoomed right in on his junk while he was going. So sleazy.
Posted Sep-14-2012 ByST0N3PONY (5225.42) 
ST0N3PONY View Channel Send Message
(1)
@ST0N3PONY power? no no no..
Posted Sep-16-2012 Byaltai8008 (236.20) 
altai8008 View Channel Send Message
(0)
@altai8008 Even as figureheads, they still wield influence. I'm not sure if the fact that they take money from the people, while doing absolutely nothing, is supposed to make the situation better or worse.
Posted Sep-16-2012 ByST0N3PONY (5225.42) 
ST0N3PONY View Channel Send Message
(0)
Fuck them, their bullshit wedding was beamed to hundreds of millions at a cost of hundreds of thousands while the country has the biggest unemployment rate in decades. Now they want privacy! It's a testimony to how stupid your population is by privileging the richest of the rich while you all suffer. Get rid of these free loaders now.
Posted Sep-15-2012 Byeire32 (100.10) eire32 View Channel Send Message
(2)
@eire32 Yet more vitriol...so sad.
Posted Sep-17-2012 Bypinksox3 (0.00) 
pinksox3 View Channel Send Message
(-2)
@pinksox3 he's right. who are them to be treated like kings when they behave like fastfood restaurant owners? most of Europe ditched monarchy because the ius sanguinis was unfair. And, at least those royals that we ditched behaved as such! you can't be called a princess if you flash your breast to the 4 winds can you?
Posted Sep-24-2012 Bybathory72 (531.40) 
bathory72 View Channel Send Message
(0)
i find it hard to masturbate to this
Posted Sep-14-2012 Bywuschii (126.92) wuschii View Channel Send Message
(1)
Who the hell cares?
Posted Sep-14-2012 Bymlivsey (1122.76) 
mlivsey View Channel Send Message
(1)
@mlivsey
you did the very moment you decided to click this link and see some royalty tits.
Posted Sep-14-2012 Bygraziebella (55.10) 
graziebella View Channel Send Message
(0)
I thought the days of wanking over a grainy VCR image were long gone.
It does bring back memories but I'd prefer HD thanks.
Posted Sep-14-2012 BySpudmonkey (1226.00) 
Spudmonkey View Channel Send Message
(1)
@Spudmonkey
LMFAO.
Posted Sep-14-2012 Bystoneeye (59.10) 
stoneeye View Channel Send Message
(0)